Uniview Racist Uyghur Recognition Revealed

By Charles Rollet, Published Nov 16, 2020, 09:13am EST

Uniview, the PRC's third-largest video surveillance manufacturer and a major supplier of China police projects, has racist software used for tracking Uyghurs, IPVM has found. Uniview responded to IPVM but avoided explaining their Uyghur tracking software.

China's three largest security camera manufacturers have all been caught offering racist software. Earlier this month, Dahua was caught using Uyghur analytics and last year Hikvision promoted a Uyghur-detecting AI camera.

This shows how PRC video surveillance manufacturers profit from the systematic oppression of Uyghurs.

It also risks Uniview attracting human rights scrutiny, an unwelcome development for the firm given that it has so far avoided the US government sanctions that Hikvision and Dahua received for helping oppress Uyghurs.

Uniview SDK Includes Uyghur Detection

The publicly-available SDK on Uniview's Downloads page [UPDATE - Uniview has now deleted it] (ARCHIVED - the SDK's NetDEVSDK.h file) includes Uyghur detection, IPVM has found and confirmed, as shown below:

IPVM Image

"Ethic" is a typo for the word "ethnic"; Uyghurs are one of China's 56 officially recognized ethnic groups. However, only Uyghurs were listed under this ethnic code tracking.

Uyghur Analytics Extremely Widespread

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

The goal of Uyghur analytics is for PRC police to be automatically notified every time a Uyghur-looking face is detected by a security camera. These analytics are explicitly racist, singling out members of an ethnic group that is currently being rounded up and sent to camps by the PRC government.

These analytics are very common all over China (not just Xinjiang). IPVM previously found over a dozen PRC police departments using Uyghur analytics and China's top law enforcement agency even included them in national facial recognition guidelines.

Uniview Touts PRC Police Projects

Uniview has long touted itself as a major China police video surveillance provider. On Chinese social media, Uniview says that to date, it has won 249 "Sharp Eyes" and 741 "Safe City" projects:

IPVM Image

As IPVM has covered, both these programs involve wide-ranging police video surveillance networks.

Uniview Background

Uniview made about $750 million in revenue in 2019 and describes itself as China's third-largest video surveillance manufacturer, behind Hikvision (which made about $8.8 billion in sales last year) and Dahua (which made about $3.73 billion.) About two thirds of Uniview's revenues come from China.

Huawei Ties Obscured

Uniview began as the surveillance division of H3C, a joint venture between Huawei and 3Com. In 2011, H3C was spun off and renamed to Uniview by US private equity firm Bain Capital. In 2017, Bain sold Uniview to Chinese smart transport firm TransInfo.

In recent years, Uniview has scrubbed mentions of Huawei from its website. Compare Uniview's "About" page in 2018, which highlights Huawei:

IPVM Image

Uniview's current "About" page removes Huawei, replacing it with HP (HP bought 3Com in 2010):

IPVM Image

Uniview's move to distance themselves from Huawei is not surprising given that the US government has heavily sanctioned Huawei.

Uniview Backed By Alibaba

Last year, Alibaba made a $500 million investment in Transinfo, buying about 15% of the company's stock, effectively backing Uniview. The investment was viewed as a major integration opportunity for Uniview due to Alibaba Cloud's intelligent traffic management solution known as City Brain.

A year ago, top Alibaba Cloud security expert Wu Hanqing praised Uniview, stating "Alibaba stands behind Uniview" and "Alibaba Cloud values ​​maximize the role of the cloud, while Univision truly understands the edge of the cloud".

IPVM Image

Uniview Response Touts "Ethic Panel"

While IPVM asked Uniview about this Uyghur tracking, Uniview avoided that claiming Uniview "genuinely believe Tech for Social Good":

Uniview genuinely believe Tech for Social Good and sincerely practice our ethic code not only internally with Ethic Panel (just like Google and other reputable high tech companies) but also externally with all the products and service provided. There is no difference in the commitment of aforementioned products and service.

IPVM responded by asking how Uyghur tracking could be considered ethical. We will update if they respond.

Uyghur Analytics Presents Sanctions Risk

Unlike Hikvision and Dahua, there are no US government sanctions against Uniview. This has benefited Uniview, as it has become the most common China alternative to Dahua and Hikvision in an IPVM study.

However, that may change if there is scrutiny on Uniview's police deals and Uyghur analytics. The US government has sanctioned many Chinese video surveillance companies over Uyghur oppression, not only Hikvision and Dahua but also Megvii, Yitu, SenseTime, and NetPosa.

Uyghur Analytics Serious Concerns

Uyghur analytics are a reality in the PRC. PRC companies are profiting heavily from this racist practice, raising significant ethical concerns for video surveillance manufacturers and for companies doing business which such manufacturers.

2 reports cite this report:

Patenting Uyghur Tracking - Huawei, Megvii, More on Jan 12, 2021
A patent application authored by Huawei and the PRC government includes...
Huawei / Megvii Uyghur Alarms on Dec 08, 2020
Huawei and Megvii worked together to test and validate Uyghur alarms,...

Comments (11)

Only IPVM Members may comment. Login or Join.

How long after Joe Biden gets into office will the bans on HIKVision and Dahua be lifted? After giving Hunter Biden $1.5 billion for his private equity firm, the Chinese government will expect some quid pro quo.

Doesn't matter how long, as long as he gets in, the USA got tremendously better.

It is interesting that you don't want anybody know who you are. Joe Biden claimed he was a moderate and accused Donald Trump of being a racist. China gave his son Hunter $1.5 billion while Joe was VP. They will expect some significant return for their investment. So how does supporting a communist country that uses technology to enforce its racist policies and enslave a population make the USA tremendously better?

You people are so dumb. Didn't trump tell white supremacists to stand down and stand by when he could have unequivocally denounced them? Did you conveniently "unhear" that like the rest of his sheep?

USA got immediately better when trump gets fired. Period. Anyone replacing him brings hope for more unity instead of divide. Period.

No debating Trump here since Uniview's Uyghur Tracking is not related to Trump. Thanks.

I am always interested to engage somebody to understand their point of view. You mean like the "unity" the democrats displayed over the last 4 years? BTW BLM and ANTIFA did $40 billion in damage before the election. I never did hear Biden denounce them. What are you thoughts on that little factoid?

UPDATE - Uniview has now deleted the version. We anticipated it and archived it - the 9/15/2020 SDK's NetDEVSDK.h file)

This could be a real problem for UNV in the US however Uniview is cutting all products containing HiSilicon chipsets to be NDAA compliant.

sidebar: It is hilarious to me that their code typo for ethnic is ethic.

Uniview has no choice but to accept and embed the racist analytic in their tech.

Uniview genuinely believe Tech for Social Good and sincerely practice our ethic code not only internally with Ethic Panel (just like Google and other reputable high tech companies)

The two parts of this sentence are oppositional and yet they wrote it as if the two parts are complimentary.

Tech for Social Good is a PRC euphemism for brutally cracking down on minority 'terrorists'.

Pretty sure that Google has no such practice embedded in their internal ethical code.

This is really disappointing news, I had seen Uniview as a solid low cost alternative to Hikua. Even if they aren't banned, I can't support something like this.

I encourage IPVM to please consider reviewing brands they might have ignored in the past, to fill the void made by the Chinese companies. I'm not an integrator so unfortunately I don't know what brands or models to suggest.

Disappointing for sure. Maybe I'm naive for giving them the benefit of the doubt that they wouldn't do the same as the others. Living in Canada the NDAA ban doesn't effect us as much but the ethical implications is why we switched from Hikvision. Now they are no different.

Loading Related Reports