Competing Against Siemens

By: Brian Karas, Published on Oct 16, 2017

Siemens entered the integration business with 15,000+ customers, through their acquisition of Security Technologies Group in 2001 [link no longer available]. Since that time, they have added more acquisitions, of both integrators and products (ex: MAC SystemsNovotec, VistaScape [link no longer available]) to expand their offerings in the security industry. Their combined service and product offering make them particularly competitive in certain scenarios, according to IPVM integrators.

This report is the final installment in our series on competing against large national integrators, having previously covered competing against ADTConvergintG4SSchneiderStanley, and  Tyco IS / JCI.

We analyze 150 integrator responses on competing against Siemens, highlighting how integrators view them, when Siemens is competitive in bids, and when they are not.

******* ******* *** *********** business **** **,***+ *********, through ***** *********** ** ******** Technologies ***** ** **** [link ** ****** *********]. Since **** ****, **** have ***** **** ************, of **** *********** *** products (**: *** **************, ********** [**** ** ****** available]) to ****** ***** ********* in *** ******** ********. Their ******** ******* *** product ******** **** **** ************ competitive ** ******* *********, according ** **** ***********.

**** ****** ** *** final *********** ** *** series ** ********* ******* large ******** ***********, ****** previously ******* ********* ******* ********************************, ***  **** ** / ***.

** ******* *** ********** responses ** ********* ******* Siemens, ************ *** *********** view ****, **** ******* is *********** ** ****, and **** **** *** not.

[***************]

Executive *******

*********** *** *** ***** compete **** ******* ** security ****, *** *** see **** **** ********** in **** ********** ** building ********** ********. 

Not *********** ** ********

*********** ***** ****** ************ that ******* *** *** competitive **** ** **** to ******** ********. **** lack ** ***** ** security ***** ********* ****** their *************** **** ******* IPVM ***********.

  • "* *** ***** * year. **** *********, **** don't **** ** ****** prioritize ********. ** ***** to ** **** **** of ** ************ ** Siemens ******."
  • "** **** ***** **** several, ******* ******* *********. We **** **** ***** in *** ******** ******** where ** **** ****** with **** **** *** not **** ** ******* a ******** *** ***** to ******** *** ****. I ***'* **** ** it's ******* **** *** too *** ** **** but ******* ***** ** have *** **** *** taken **** ********* *** had *******."
  • "** ***** ******* ******* Siemens. ***** ******* ** high *** ***** ********** in ******** ** *** very ****."
  • "** ****** *** ****** Siemens, **** *** *** a ****** ******** ********** in *** *** ***********. They *** * **** competitor, **** ***'* ***** dirty."
  • "******. * ***** **** shut **** ***** ******** effort ****** **."

Fire ********** ******** ******

******* *** **** ***** seen ** ***** * competitor ********* **** ** came ** **** ***** systems. **** ** ****** due ** *** ******* manufacturing***** *** **** ******/********** equipment, ****** **** ** advantage ** **** ******, and ****** ** *** worth ******** ******* *** the *******.

  • "** ** *** ** fire ***** *** **** is *** ** ******* don't *** ****."
  • "******* ***** ** ****** quite * *** ** Fire ***** **** **** in *** ****. ** don't ******* ** *** Fire ****** ** **** are *** ** ******* to **."
  • "**** **** **** **** on ***** ********** **** alarm ****. ******** ** that **** *** ****-****** and ******** *********** ******* to ****** ********."
  • "** **** ****** **** them ** ********, **** seem **** **** **** fire *** **** **** well. * *** ******** experiences **** ****."
  • "**** *********, **** ** the **** *****, **'** more ** ******/*****, **** are * ****, **** turnover, ********** *****'* ****, sales ***** ** ** the ********* *****"
  • "***** **** ********** ****** and * *** **** . ***** *** ***** is ** ***** *** have ***** *** ** deal **** **** ******** , *** ********* ********"

Building **********

******** ********** *** ******* systems **** ******* **** where ******* *** ***** to ** * **** likely **********.

  • "************ ** ******** *********. Similar ** ******* ********. Strong ******** ******** *** weak ** ******* ** security. ********* **** ********* prices."
  • "**** ** ******. **** tend ** ******* ** large ***** ********* ********** where ******** ********** ** a ******. *******, **** had * ***** ** of ** ** *** security **** ** *** territory * *** ***** back *** *** ***** recreating ********** *******."
  • "** * ******* ***** but **** ** * building ********** **** - not ******** ****. **** company ** ******* ** JCI **** ****** ************ of ******* ******* ****** them **** ****** ** be ***********."
  • "** **** *** ******** against ******* *******, **** really **** ***** ** the ******** ********** **** and ***'* *** **** into ******** ****. * have ***** **** ****** from ********* ** *** building ****, *** *****'* heard **** ** *** they ** ** *** security ****."
  • "******. **** ******* ** security ***** *** *********** on *** ******** ******** and **** ***** ********"

Large ****

**** **** ******** ***********, Siemens ** **** ****** to ** ******** **** on ****** ****, ***** customers *** **** ****** to ******* *** ********* Siemens *** *******, *** where **** *** **** likely ** ** ********** for * ****** ************.

  • "************. **** **** ** focus ** ***** ********** jobs ** *** ******."
  • "******. **** ***** *** environments ** ***** *********. Performance ** ********* ****, but ***** ********** **** their ******** ******** ******** gets **** ********."
  • "******* ******** ** *** very ***** ******** ** Toronto (*.*. *********) *** we ***'*. * ***** run **** **** *** do * **** ******** good ** *** ** say."

Generally ******** **** ** *******

*******, *********** *** * positive *********** ** *******. While *** *** ********* indicated ****** ** ******* for *******, *** **** that **** *** ******* positive ******** **** *********** was ********** *** * national **********.

  • "*****, ********* ********* ********** of *** *******."
  • "**** ** **** **** company, *** ****** **** the ******* ****."
  • "** * *******. *****. Good *******, **** ****** reps ** *** *****."
  • "***** ******* ******* ****, but ** ******* ** their ******** **** **** to **** **** ***** products *** ** * good *** **** *** installation."
  • "*****. **** ** **** they **"

Comments (3)

I did not get a good impression of their security people when we needed to work with them for a common client in Florida. They installed the access control system and we needed to connect a network I/O device to it to initiate a lockdown of all the doors that came from a 3rd party system. Too long and complex a story to get into, but the short of it was all we needed for them to do was connect the wires from the I/O device we had mounted on the wall  to one of their panels in an IDF and program a rule in the system to lock or unlock doors based on the input. They didn't even need a ladder as the panel and I/O were both wall mounted person height.

1. They said because we were requesting it, they were going to charge a higher rate to the client rather than the client's "discounted" contract rate. Which made no sense as we were doing this on the request of the client and simply doing the technical coordination so the client didn't have to be the go-between.

2. Their "discounted rate" was the same as many of the standard rates around the area.

3. Two guys showed up and all one of them did was stand around and watch. They were there maybe two hours but tried to charge almost a full day for both people. I had to argue with them to be fair to the client and get the hours reduced, but not by much.

It just gave me the impression they were used to milking large contracts with impunity where overcharges like that were rarely noticed.

When YOU hold all the ace's to the deck , there is no competition. 

I work with , compete against, do business with Siemens all the time 

and think they as a whole are a great company 

Very competent, very professional, Very Expensive 

If i were to rank them , I would put them up there with the top 1% of most expensive 

I work on , integrate to , and troubleshoot their systems all the time. 

When I price out against them it is very easy to figure. 

My cost, Burden, overhead + 100% = a competitive bid . 

While most of the time they get work due to size, client , negotiation of job, at least from what i can see.

Im in the low end of the food chain.

When a 1500.00 price tag is competitive to a 5 k price tag 

how can you loose.  

it is being sure to keep the proprietary format in place that works 

we still get to see the outrageous price index. 

this is due to overhead

Proprietary is the Key

Certified people who can work on their product line is the other key. 

most of the large projects we don't even see. 

5-10 million projects that's where they can bury the figures and come out smelling like a rose. 

and that is where Siemens subs out a lot of work 

 

When ever our customers require 3 quotes, we frequently give them Siemens number as they will always provide a larger estimate and help ensure we get the job.

Login to read this IPVM report.

Related Reports

Cisco Acquiring Fluidmesh on Apr 09, 2020
Cisco announced it is acquiring niche wireless manufacturer...
IDIS Presents 12MP IR Panoramic Fisheye on May 26, 2020
IDIS presented its 12MP IR panoramic fisheye camera at the April 2020 IPVM...
Euklis Presents AI Analytics on May 05, 2020
Euklis presented its AI facial recognition, LPR, and object recognition...
ISS Presents Face As A Credential and UVSS on Apr 30, 2020
ISS presented its security platform, including access control integration,...
WatchNET Presents Long Range Wireless Automation Sensors on May 05, 2020
WatchNet IoT presented its commercial, long-range automation sensor...
Milestone Launches Multiple Cloud Solutions on Feb 18, 2020
Milestone is going to the cloud, becoming one of the last prominent VMSes to...
Genetec Presents Security Center for Airports on Apr 28, 2020
Genetec presented its Security Center for Airports at the April 2020 IPVM New...
Avigilon Open Analytics Tested on Apr 16, 2020
After years of effectively closed analytics, Avigilon decided in late 2018 to...
Favorite VSaaS Providers 2020 on Apr 17, 2020
VSaaS is starting to become mainstream but who are integrator's...
NetApp Presents Hybrid Cloud Video Archive on May 11, 2020
NetApp presented its hybrid S3 cloud video archive at the April 2020 IPVM New...
Milestone Presents XProtect On AWS on May 04, 2020
Milestone presented its XProtect on AWS offering at the April 2020 IPVM New...
SenseB4 Presents Cloud Network Device Monitoring on Jun 09, 2020
SenseB4 presented its cybersecurity and network health monitoring products at...
GeoVision Presents AI and Facial Recognition on May 22, 2020
GeoVision presented its AI analytics and facial recognition at the April 2020...
Motorola Solutions Speaks on Avigilon / Video Strategy on Feb 04, 2020
2 years ago Motorola Solutions acquired Avigilon for a billion dollars but...
Hanwha Presents AI Analytics and First 8K Camera on May 11, 2020
Hanwha presented their AI Analytics and the "Industry's First 8K" camera at...

Recent Reports

Genetec CEO Declares "We Don't Negotiate Payment With Patent Trolls" on Aug 11, 2020
Are patent trolls like terrorists? Genetec's CEO is coming out strongly...
Hanwha AI Analytics Camera Tested on Aug 11, 2020
Hanwha has released their Wisenet P AI camera, adding person and vehicle...
Alabama Schools Million Dollar Hikvision Fever Camera Deal on Aug 11, 2020
The Baldwin County, Alabama public schools purchased a $1 million, 144-camera...
Dahua Taunts Australian Government, Continues To Sell Illegal Fever Cameras on Aug 10, 2020
Dahua is effectively taunting the Australian government by continuing to sell...
HID Releases VertX Replacement Aero on Aug 10, 2020
HID is replacing two established and broadly supported types of access...
NDAA Compliant Video Surveillance Whitelist on Aug 10, 2020
This report aggregates video surveillance products that manufacturers have...
Telpo China Temperature Tablets Tested on Aug 10, 2020
The provider for overseas companies ranging from Canon Singapore to US'...
Dangerous Hikvision Fever Camera Showcased by Chilean City on Aug 07, 2020
Deploying a fever camera outdoors, in the rain, with no black body, is...
"Grand Slam" For Pelco's PE Firm, A Risk For Motorola on Aug 07, 2020
The word "Pelco" and "grand slam" have not been said together for many years....
FLIR Stock Falls, Admits 'Decelerating' Demand For Temperature Screening on Aug 07, 2020
Is the boom going to bust for temperature screening? FLIR disappointed...
VSaaS Will Hurt Integrators on Aug 06, 2020
VSaaS will hurt integrators, there is no question about that. How much...
Dogs For Coronavirus Screening Examined on Aug 06, 2020
While thermal temperature screening is the surveillance industry's most...
ADT Slides Back, Disappointing Results, Poor Commercial Performance on Aug 06, 2020
While ADT had an incredible start to the week, driven by the Google...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all...
SIA Coaches Sellers on NDAA 889B Blacklist Workarounds on Aug 05, 2020
Last month SIA demanded that NDAA 899B "must be delayed". Now that they have...