Competing Against Siemens

By: Brian Karas, Published on Oct 16, 2017

Siemens entered the integration business with 15,000+ customers, through their acquisition of Security Technologies Group in 2001 [link no longer available]. Since that time, they have added more acquisitions, of both integrators and products (ex: MAC SystemsNovotec, VistaScape [link no longer available]) to expand their offerings in the security industry. Their combined service and product offering make them particularly competitive in certain scenarios, according to IPVM integrators.

This report is the final installment in our series on competing against large national integrators, having previously covered competing against ADTConvergintG4SSchneiderStanley, and  Tyco IS / JCI.

We analyze 150 integrator responses on competing against Siemens, highlighting how integrators view them, when Siemens is competitive in bids, and when they are not.

******* ******* *** *********** business **** **,***+ *********, through ***** *********** ** ******** Technologies ***** ** **** [link ** ****** *********]. Since **** ****, **** have ***** **** ************, of **** *********** *** products (**: *** **************, ********** [**** ** ****** available]) to ****** ***** ********* in *** ******** ********. Their ******** ******* *** product ******** **** **** ************ competitive ** ******* *********, according ** **** ***********.

**** ****** ** *** final *********** ** *** series ** ********* ******* large ******** ***********, ****** previously ******* ********* ******* ********************************, ***  **** ** / ***.

** ******* *** ********** responses ** ********* ******* Siemens, ************ *** *********** view ****, **** ******* is *********** ** ****, and **** **** *** not.

[***************]

Executive *******

*********** *** *** ***** compete **** ******* ** security ****, *** *** see **** **** ********** in **** ********** ** building ********** ********. 

Not *********** ** ********

*********** ***** ****** ************ that ******* *** *** competitive **** ** **** to ******** ********. **** lack ** ***** ** security ***** ********* ****** their *************** **** ******* IPVM ***********.

  • "* *** ***** * year. **** *********, **** don't **** ** ****** prioritize ********. ** ***** to ** **** **** of ** ************ ** Siemens ******."
  • "** **** ***** **** several, ******* ******* *********. We **** **** ***** in *** ******** ******** where ** **** ****** with **** **** *** not **** ** ******* a ******** *** ***** to ******** *** ****. I ***'* **** ** it's ******* **** *** too *** ** **** but ******* ***** ** have *** **** *** taken **** ********* *** had *******."
  • "** ***** ******* ******* Siemens. ***** ******* ** high *** ***** ********** in ******** ** *** very ****."
  • "** ****** *** ****** Siemens, **** *** *** a ****** ******** ********** in *** *** ***********. They *** * **** competitor, **** ***'* ***** dirty."
  • "******. * ***** **** shut **** ***** ******** effort ****** **."

Fire ********** ******** ******

******* *** **** ***** seen ** ***** * competitor ********* **** ** came ** **** ***** systems. **** ** ****** due ** *** ******* manufacturing***** *** **** ******/********** equipment, ****** **** ** advantage ** **** ******, and ****** ** *** worth ******** ******* *** the *******.

  • "** ** *** ** fire ***** *** **** is *** ** ******* don't *** ****."
  • "******* ***** ** ****** quite * *** ** Fire ***** **** **** in *** ****. ** don't ******* ** *** Fire ****** ** **** are *** ** ******* to **."
  • "**** **** **** **** on ***** ********** **** alarm ****. ******** ** that **** *** ****-****** and ******** *********** ******* to ****** ********."
  • "** **** ****** **** them ** ********, **** seem **** **** **** fire *** **** **** well. * *** ******** experiences **** ****."
  • "**** *********, **** ** the **** *****, **'** more ** ******/*****, **** are * ****, **** turnover, ********** *****'* ****, sales ***** ** ** the ********* *****"
  • "***** **** ********** ****** and * *** **** . ***** *** ***** is ** ***** *** have ***** *** ** deal **** **** ******** , *** ********* ********"

Building **********

******** ********** *** ******* systems **** ******* **** where ******* *** ***** to ** * **** likely **********.

  • "************ ** ******** *********. Similar ** ******* ********. Strong ******** ******** *** weak ** ******* ** security. ********* **** ********* prices."
  • "**** ** ******. **** tend ** ******* ** large ***** ********* ********** where ******** ********** ** a ******. *******, **** had * ***** ** of ** ** *** security **** ** *** territory * *** ***** back *** *** ***** recreating ********** *******."
  • "** * ******* ***** but **** ** * building ********** **** - not ******** ****. **** company ** ******* ** JCI **** ****** ************ of ******* ******* ****** them **** ****** ** be ***********."
  • "** **** *** ******** against ******* *******, **** really **** ***** ** the ******** ********** **** and ***'* *** **** into ******** ****. * have ***** **** ****** from ********* ** *** building ****, *** *****'* heard **** ** *** they ** ** *** security ****."
  • "******. **** ******* ** security ***** *** *********** on *** ******** ******** and **** ***** ********"

Large ****

**** **** ******** ***********, Siemens ** **** ****** to ** ******** **** on ****** ****, ***** customers *** **** ****** to ******* *** ********* Siemens *** *******, *** where **** *** **** likely ** ** ********** for * ****** ************.

  • "************. **** **** ** focus ** ***** ********** jobs ** *** ******."
  • "******. **** ***** *** environments ** ***** *********. Performance ** ********* ****, but ***** ********** **** their ******** ******** ******** gets **** ********."
  • "******* ******** ** *** very ***** ******** ** Toronto (*.*. *********) *** we ***'*. * ***** run **** **** *** do * **** ******** good ** *** ** say."

Generally ******** **** ** *******

*******, *********** *** * positive *********** ** *******. While *** *** ********* indicated ****** ** ******* for *******, *** **** that **** *** ******* positive ******** **** *********** was ********** *** * national **********.

  • "*****, ********* ********* ********** of *** *******."
  • "**** ** **** **** company, *** ****** **** the ******* ****."
  • "** * *******. *****. Good *******, **** ****** reps ** *** *****."
  • "***** ******* ******* ****, but ** ******* ** their ******** **** **** to **** **** ***** products *** ** * good *** **** *** installation."
  • "*****. **** ** **** they **"

Comments (3)

I did not get a good impression of their security people when we needed to work with them for a common client in Florida. They installed the access control system and we needed to connect a network I/O device to it to initiate a lockdown of all the doors that came from a 3rd party system. Too long and complex a story to get into, but the short of it was all we needed for them to do was connect the wires from the I/O device we had mounted on the wall  to one of their panels in an IDF and program a rule in the system to lock or unlock doors based on the input. They didn't even need a ladder as the panel and I/O were both wall mounted person height.

1. They said because we were requesting it, they were going to charge a higher rate to the client rather than the client's "discounted" contract rate. Which made no sense as we were doing this on the request of the client and simply doing the technical coordination so the client didn't have to be the go-between.

2. Their "discounted rate" was the same as many of the standard rates around the area.

3. Two guys showed up and all one of them did was stand around and watch. They were there maybe two hours but tried to charge almost a full day for both people. I had to argue with them to be fair to the client and get the hours reduced, but not by much.

It just gave me the impression they were used to milking large contracts with impunity where overcharges like that were rarely noticed.

When YOU hold all the ace's to the deck , there is no competition. 

I work with , compete against, do business with Siemens all the time 

and think they as a whole are a great company 

Very competent, very professional, Very Expensive 

If i were to rank them , I would put them up there with the top 1% of most expensive 

I work on , integrate to , and troubleshoot their systems all the time. 

When I price out against them it is very easy to figure. 

My cost, Burden, overhead + 100% = a competitive bid . 

While most of the time they get work due to size, client , negotiation of job, at least from what i can see.

Im in the low end of the food chain.

When a 1500.00 price tag is competitive to a 5 k price tag 

how can you loose.  

it is being sure to keep the proprietary format in place that works 

we still get to see the outrageous price index. 

this is due to overhead

Proprietary is the Key

Certified people who can work on their product line is the other key. 

most of the large projects we don't even see. 

5-10 million projects that's where they can bury the figures and come out smelling like a rose. 

and that is where Siemens subs out a lot of work 

 

When ever our customers require 3 quotes, we frequently give them Siemens number as they will always provide a larger estimate and help ensure we get the job.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Altronix Claims Tango 'Eliminates Electricians' on Oct 15, 2019
Power supply provider Altronix claims its new Tango power supply 'eliminates the need for an electrician, dedicated conduit and wire runs'. In...
Top Ways Security Integrators Improve Their Careers on Sep 03, 2019
With DIY products expanding and the future of integration debated, how do integrators stay sharp so they are not left behind? 180+ integrators...
Security Integrators Outlook On Remaining Integrators In 2025 on Aug 22, 2019
The industry has changed substantially in the last decade, with the rise of IP cameras and the race to the bottom. Indeed, more changes may be...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Aug 13, 2019
Biometrics are commonly used in phones, but how frequently are they used for access? 150+ integrators told us how often they use biometrics,...
US Government Ban of Dahua, Hikvision, Huawei Takes Effect Now on Aug 13, 2019
The 'prohibition on use or procurement' of Dahua, Hikvision and Huawei products and 'essential components' take effect today, August 13, 2019, one...
Proactive CCTV "Only Affordable Video Archiving Solution" Profile on Aug 12, 2019
Proactive CCTV is claiming to offer "the only affordable video archiving solution on the market", reducing the storage typically required for H.265...
Responsibility Split Selecting Locks - Statistics on Jul 22, 2019
A heated access debate surrounds who should pick and install the locks. While responsible for selecting the control systems, integrators often...
Mobile Access Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 18, 2019
The ability to use mobile phones as access credentials is one of the biggest trends in a market that historically has been slow in adopting new...
Poor OSDP Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 09, 2019
OSDP certainly offers advantages over decades-old Wiegand (see our OSDP Access Control Guide) but new IPVM statistics show that usage of OSDP, even...
Maglocks Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 01, 2019
Maglocks divide access control specifiers perhaps more than any other component. Many are concerned about life safety codes, but others cite...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Alarm Veteran "Demands A Criminal Investigation" Of UL on Oct 18, 2019
The Interceptor's Project pressure against UL continues to rise. Following Keith Jentoft's allegation that "UL Has Blood On Their Hands", Jentoft...
Camect "Worlds Smartest Camera Hub" Tested on Oct 18, 2019
Camect is a Silicon Valley startup that claims the "Smartest AI Object Detection On The Market", detecting not only people and vehicles, but...
Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Oct 17, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...
Camera Calculator V3.1 Release Improves User Experience on Oct 17, 2019
IPVM has released a new version of our Camera Calculator, V3.1, with significant user experience improvements, a new development plan, and an...
Securing Access Control Installations Tutorial on Oct 17, 2019
The physical security of access control components is critical to ensuring that a facility is truly secure. Otherwise, the entire system can be...
Access Control Course Fall 2019 - Last Chance on Oct 17, 2019
Register Now - Fall 2019 Access Control Course. Thursday, October 17th is the last day to register. IPVM offers the most comprehensive access...
US DoD Comments on Huawei, Hikvision, Dahua Cyber Security Concerns on Oct 16, 2019
A senior DoD official said the US is "concerned" with the cybersecurity of Hikvision, Dahua, and Huawei due to "CCP" (China Communist Party)...
Pelco Sarix Pro3 Camera Tested on Oct 16, 2019
Pelco has released their Sarix Professional Series 3 cameras, claiming "more security detail in challenging scenes with excellent low light and...
IPVM Camera Calculator User Manual / Guide on Oct 16, 2019
Learn how to use the IPVM Camera Calculator. The guide below includes instructions, images, gifs, and videos demonstrating and explaining the...
Altronix Claims Tango 'Eliminates Electricians' on Oct 15, 2019
Power supply provider Altronix claims its new Tango power supply 'eliminates the need for an electrician, dedicated conduit and wire runs'. In...