STP vs UTP for Video Surveillance Tutorial

By Brian Rhodes, Published on Dec 20, 2017

For many video system designers, deciding which ethernet cabling to use is a quick decision: go with the cheapest. However, this overlooks the possibility cable, and the video it carries, needs extra protection against common electromagnetic interference.

STP vs UTP for Video Surveillance

Is the difference between cable types that significant? In this note, we examine shielded cable, look at how it can prevent video problems, and compare it to nonshielded alternatives.

Inside this note, we explain:

  • How Electrical Interference Affects Video Quality
  • What Shielded Cable Looks Like Compared To UTP
  • Physical Differences Between Cable Types
  • Other Names For STP
  • Typical STP vs UTP Costs
  • Use STP Against Common Sources of Interference
  • Practical Use Is Limited, But Axis Disagrees

One Of Many Cable Tutorial Series

This tutorial is one of a number IPVM has addressing the topic of cabling. Others include: Cat 5e vs. Cat 6 for IP Cameras, Cabling Best Practices Guide, Network Cable Testing Guide, Grounding and Bonding for Video Surveillance, and more.

Electrical ************ ******* ***** *******

** *** ***** ************ world, *** ******** ** often ** ******* *** NVRs, *** ****** ********* to *** ******* ** between. **** ***** ******* problems *****, ** *** be * *********** ******** to **** ****** *** tweak ********, **** ** discover ******** *** ***** present.

*******, ****** * **** look ** ******* *** resolve ********* ******. **** the ******* ** *** image *****:

********** ************ ** *** cabling ****** ***** **** type ** *******. *** only **** *** ***** transmit ******** **** *******, but ** **** *** attract *** ******** ********* 'noise'. * ******** ***** can ***** ** ** 'ad-hoc *******' ***** ********* why ***** ********* ** sometimes ********.

'STP' ** ********** ***** *********

* ***** ******** ********** between *********** *** *** STP, ** '******** ******* pair' ******* ******* *** primary ***********. *** ***** below ***** *** ********** metallic **** ********* *********** wire ***** ** ***:

'*********' ****** *** ** confused **** '***** *********' where * ****** ***** or ******** **** ** mesh ****** *** ****** bundle ** *****. ***** the ******** ** ************ wrap ***** ****** ***** wrap *** ****** ****** shares **** ** *** same ********, **** *** not ********** ** *** other *** ****** ** different ***********.

Other ***** *** ***

*** ****** ************ *** shielded ******* **** *****, 'STP', ** ********* ****** 'U/FTP' *** '**********/****-******** ******* pair' ** '*/***' *** 'Shielded/Foil-screened ******* ****' *******. Especially *** ********** ******* specifications, **** *** *** these ********* ************* ** describe ******** *******. *******, in ******* ***, *** 'STP' ************ ** **** widely ****.

Physical *********** ******* ***** *****

*** ********* **** ********** the ******** *********** ******* UTP *** ***.

  • ******** **** ******:* **** ***** ** foil, ******** ********, ********* wire *****. **** ***** is ***** ****** *** 'drain', *** **** ** properly **********. ******* ** adequately ****** *** ***** can ******* *** ******** that *** ******** ** mitigate.
  • ******* ******:*** ***** ****** ** foil ******** *** ****** add ******** ** *** cable ******. ** * result, * ******* ******* insulating ****** ** ******, which **** ********. *******, STP ** ******* *** thicker ******** ** ***, and *** ** **** difficult ** ******* ** a ******.
  • *****, **** ******, *** Groundwires:********* ** *** ***** manufacturer *** ***** ** STP, ***** ******** *** be ******* *** ******** found ** *** *******. This ******** ******* ******* 'core' ******, ******* ** aid ********* *** ******, and ********** ********** ********* wires. ***** ** ** outdoor ***** ***** **** a ****** **** **** separates *** ***** **** quadrants ****** *** ******.

STP ** *** ********** ***********

***** ********** ******** ******** provide *** **** ********** that *** **** *** possess.

  • *** **********:*** ******* ********* ** shielding ** ********** **** environmental*************** ************, ** ***. ******* each **** ** ************ wrapped, *** ******* *** ambient ************ ** ******** and ***** **** *** cable ** ************* ********* or **********.
  • ******** **** *****: ************ *** ** a '***-*** ******' ** that ********** ******* ** a ****** ****** ** interference. ** **** ************, like ********* ******* ******* or *************, ****** ******** cabling *** ** * uncontrolled ******* *** ************ that ****** ***** *********** off. *****, *** ******** of **** ********* ********* or ********** **** *******.

Cost **********

***** *** **** ******* $20 ** $** *** camera ******** ** *** cabling, ******** ***** **** of *** ****, ***** on *** ***** ***** ~40% **** **** *** and ********* ** *** much ********** ***** ** larger ******* ** ****** for *** ******, ******* and **** ***** ***.

Use *** ******* ****** ******* ** ************

******, *** ****** ** used ***** ************ ***** be * *******. ** firm ** ***** ***** places ******** *** *****, here *** **** ****** where ************ ***** ****** video *******:

******** ** **** ******* Wiring

***** ****** *** ********* with **** ************ **** run ******** ** ** too **** **** *****. Even ****** *** * compliant ******** ***** ****** a ******** ******* *** be * ****** ** video ************.

***** ** **** ************* exists *** **** ** use *** ** **** situation *** *****, **** practices ** **** ********** design ****** **** *** data ******* ******* *** same *******, ********** ** how ** ** ********* in*** ** *******, **** ** *** using *** *****.

**** ********* *******

**** ******* *** **** common ***************** ******** **** electric ******, ***** ************, magnetic *****, ** ********* can ********* *********** ***. Especially *** ********** **********, where ***** ******* *** common, ********* ***** **** is ** ********* **********.

***** ******* *** ************* by ***** '*********' **********, ** ***** reliance ** ******** ****** for *********. ***** ********* to ******* **** **** equipment, *********** ****, **** maglocks, ********** **********, *** industrial ********* *** ******** enough ************ ** ******* video *******.

*** *******/****** *******

****** *** ******* ************* radios ******* **** ************. While * ***** ******* may *** ** *********** enough ** ** * problem, ******** **** **** near **** ******* ********* or ************ ****** ** run ***** *** ** eliminate ********.

**************** ********

*** ** *** ******* sources ** *** *** common ***** ********. ***** the ****** ********** ** ethernet ****** ******* ******** of ***** ********, ** cabling ****** ** *** in ****** ***** ***** on*******, ** ****** ** run ***** *** *****.

**** *****, ***** *** many ********* ***** ******** 'installed ** ******' ** to ** **** *** video. ** **** *****, cabling ********** ********* ** the ****** ** ***** quality ******** **** ****** unfixed ***** *** ***** network ** *********.

Practical *** ** *******

** *** **********, *** vast ******** ** *** surveillance ******** ******* *** been *** ***** ***, and ** **** ** significant ****** ** ******. Since ********** ******** **** the *********** ****** ** imperatively ************ ** ********** and ********** ****** "**** practices [**** ** ****** available]", ** ** ********* suitable *** ***** ******* design.

Axis: ********* *** *** ********

******** ***** **** ************** declared *** ** *** mandatory *** ******* ******* per *** ********* ********** [link ** ****** *********]:

"*** ************** ** ** deploy ** *** ******* cable ** ********* ********** environments. ******** ** ********* indoor ************ *** ***** the ******* ***** ** located ** ******** **** electrical ***** ****** ****** or ***** ***** ********* loads **** ** ****** or ********** *** ** close ******** ** *** camera ** *** *****.It ** **** ********* to use an STP cable where the camera is used outdoors or where the network cable is routed outdoors."

**** ** * **** statement ***** ****~**% ** *** ******* are ********* *******. ********* ****' ************** may ***** * *********** increase ** ******* ******* cost *** ** ****** overkill ******** ** ****** problems *****.

******, *** ********** ********* with *** *********** *********** of ***. *** ******** use ** *** ** where ******** ** *** in *** '**** ****' areas ********** *****.

Test **** *********

***** ****** **** * * questions ****

[****: **** ******** *** originally ********* ** **** and ************* ******* ** 2017]

Comments (23)

Cabling infrastructure properly designed and installed can eliminate a lot of the issues seen in the field with IPVS.  BICSI is the global organization that drives standards and best practices in the structured cabling industry.  If your not familiar with them, they are worth checking out.

Unfortunately a lot of bad habits surfaced when the industry transitioned from analog systems to IP systems.  Installations best practices that worked for RG-6, will not work for UTP/STP systems.  Performance verification is not always required for many IPVS installs, compared to traditional data installs.  Improper pathways, mismatching components, poor field terminations, all contribute to poor IPVS installations.

While I understand the benefits of an STP cabling system, I don't believe it's necessary for all outdoor cameras.  STP components are far more costly, and more labor intensive to install.  It's not just the cable, but the patch panels, jacks, and patch cords as well.  This will add additional expense when compared to a properly designed UTP installation.

IP data is IP data.  Video requires reliable and timely delivery.  On the network we can apply QoS settings and other advanced networking features to ensure timely delivery of multiple traffic types, but if the packets don't transport reliability across the infrastructure it's a moot point at best.

It's not just the cable, but the patch panels, jacks, and patch cords as well. This will add additional expense when compared to a properly designed UTP installation.

 

Exactly, all of that is important because the cable must be properly grounded or the shielding can work as an antenna - improper grounding of STP can cause worse conditions than just running the cheaper, easier UTP.

...the cable must be properly grounded or the shielding can work as an antenna - improper grounding of STP can cause worse conditions...

But just on the switch side of the cable, right?

Yes, as I understand it (and I am no cable expert) grounding at the switch, or patch panel side is all that is required.  Grounding both sides can cause ground loops but these tend to be on power-cycle frequencies which don't interfere much with Ethernet communications.  Having said that it is better to avoid ground loops altogether so why go through the extra work of grounding the jack end?

Grounding is done on one end only, although the specific end "field device vs switch" often varies according to manufacturer.

For example, many (access) reader manufacturers specify grounding at the reader, not the controller, or switch.  Some camera manufacturers, especially PTZs, include ground taps in the enclosure.

In general, the ground is more reliable if done at the switch rack, via TSB or some other central maintained earth ground.

As an FYI, we are prepping a test that looks at STP vs UTP shield effectiveness.  We will subject UTP and STP connected cameras to some nasty EMI to see what differences can be seen.  Look for that next month!

Thanks for the comment.  We refer to those BICSI guidelines and recommendations in our BICSI For IP Video Surveillance Guide and IP Networking course, and the 'best practices' aspect is useful. 

Installers should buy or find a copy of the TDMM even if the local AHJ has no idea what it is.

 Installers should buy or find a copy of the TDMM...

Just don’t take Ethan’s copy:

 

Thanks Brian.  I've been a BICSI RCDD for over 15 years... great training... great organization.  Agreed... every installer should have a copy of the TDMM as a reference manual if nothing else.  Merry Christmas!

RCDD = "really cool data dude"

Basic BICI knowledge will tell you that most signal current is carried by the outer surface of each copper conductor.  Not down the center so it makes it difficult to keep it from being interfered with.  Biggest give away is running cable in parallele with other type of cable.  Including inside conduit.

Problem we have is on large jobs the electrical contractor runs their own low voltage then hire a security integrator to finish the hand and bang portion.  In some cases the low voltage guy is only making 12% profit.  So if their is a mistake he can eat it big time.  So they will go the less expensive route.  Less expensive in Labor time and call backs.

I have seen security contractors use the local big cable house to run all the low voltage infrastructure then they can price their portion cheaper than the contractor/integrator that has all the work done in-house.

Back home in Europe we always called cable by type, like utp or ftp, etc. By default, it means you talking about cat 5e cable. If you need cat6, 6a, 7 for some reason, you just specify category as well.

when I moved to Canada, I figured, that most of the installers never heard about data cable types (utp is the only one) and they believe that cat5e is a cable for 100mbps and cat6 is for gigabit

 Other Names For STP

Yes, one may be best off using the full specifier instead of ‘STP’ considering the many different uses:

There is an recomendation about analog cameras?

If I'm using a TP cable with baluns, have I use an STP cable to outdoor cameras?

Welcome, thanks for the question.

Because 'shielding' protects digital signals (EMI) differently than analog (signal loss), the importance is not for video quality as much as it is for cable run length.

As a point of illustration, coax cable is shielded by design, and the effectiveness of the shield corresponds to signal loss.  Thicker/more dense shielding (ie: RG6) versus thinner (ie: RG59) results in less loss over the length of cable runs.

In the case of twisted-pair/baluns like you describe, shielding would reduce signal loss, although the fact the wire is twisted to begin with also helps. 

Because 'shielding' protects digital signals (EMI) differently than analog (signal loss), the importance is not for video quality as much as it is for cable run length.

At least from a theoretical perspective, I would think the opposite, as far as video quality is concerned.

With analog, any noise that makes its way into the cable, and is not filtered out by common-mode-rejection will be present in the picture as artifact.

With digital, even the noise that makes it past CMR will usually be corrected/discarded by the reciever as it turns varying voltage levels into 1’s and 0’s.  It’s only the extreme noise that manifests in a digital signal.

IMHO.

*Edit: To clarify, I’m saying that the effect of STP on the analog signal quality is as important as that of run length.  Not that STP doesnt improve digital quality as well.

 

I am saying that an aspect of analog transmission - signal loss - comes into play sooner and is more important to address first rather than video quality.

Signal is lost no matter the external video quality EMI impacts.  Shielding helps mitgate this loss.

 

Shielding helps prevent EMI (electrical magnetic interference).  Signal loss is caused by attenuation (loss as the signal strength travels the length of the transmission cable).  When it comes to coax or STP cable, both of these properties come into play.

STP cable will by default provide greater EMI protection over UTP cable, regardless of where installed (indoors or outdoors).  Cable twist reduces pair-to-pair cross-talk, which is signal jumping between the pairs within the cable jacket.  Attenuation can be reduced by using a thicker gauge wire.  Example, 24 gauge wire will have less attenuation that 26 gauge wire because of it's electrical properties.  With high end UTP cable, some products use 24 ga and some use 26 ga.  This is generally found in Category 6 rated cable and higher only.

Coax is a great medium for analog signals because of its robust shield and the physical size of it's conductor.  The challenge always was the cost of the material, cable path fill, bend radius, and home run design requirements.  UTP with baluns can help solve many of these short comings, and provide a future infrastructure upgrade path to IP camera connectivity.

I'm not disagreeing with Brian, just diving deeper into the weeds.

UTP with baluns can help solve many of these short comings, and provide a future infrastructure upgrade path to IP camera connectivity.

 

I read somewhere years ago that UTP is recommended over STP when using baluns. I don't remember if it was a creditable source or the reasoning behind it. We have done it both ways without a problem in the past. 

Shields need to be grounded.  If the shields are not grounded properly, they effectively become antennas for EMI with no where to go.  This might be the idea behind the recommendation you cite.  Just a guess.

It was something to that nature. But more along the lines of causing some type of self interference, not from an outside source. 

Either way, the few times we used STP and baluns, the shield never got grounded. 

Before I knew anything about codes, best practices, and what shielded or unshielded cable even meant, I worked for a company doing a lot of old work wiring. We would run wire breaking every rule in the book, twice, on the same 500' run. Looking back at it, it is surprising that we never really had problems other than the horrible connections we crimped using some primitive tools provided to us. 

And even now the only major problem I can think of concerning interference is the little AC/DC transformer wall worts. 

John you should start a pole to find out where others have found specific examples. I'm not much of a book person. 

Axis reasoning for STP outdoors is more than likely trying to protect their equipment. Not so much preventing interference.  Netonix provides some good hands on advise with outdoor cabling in this respect. It's specific to communication towers, but still relevant for outdoor camera runs. And backed by actual field experience.

 

Surges from Static, ESD, or ground potential shifts will take the shortest less resistive path like your Ethernet cable unless you provide a dedicated ground path that is of less resistance and shorter run to ground than your Ethernet cable - THINK SERVICE LOOPS

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,592 reports, 889 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Drain Wire For Access Control Reader Tutorial on Sep 23, 2020
An easy-to-miss cabling specification plays a key role in access control, yet...
The Future of H.266 For Video Surveillance Examined on Aug 17, 2020
First H.264, now H.265, is H.266 next? H.266 was recently announced amid...
Remote Network Access for Video Surveillance Guide on Jul 27, 2020
Remotely accessing surveillance systems is key in 2020, with more and more...
Access Control and Video Integration Statistics 2020 on Oct 08, 2020
Video Surveillance and Access Control are two of the most common security...
OnTech Smart Services Partners With Google and Amazon To Compete With Integrators on Sep 25, 2020
A pain point for many homeowners to use consumer security and surveillance is...
Network Cable Usage Statistics 2020 (Cat 5e vs Cat 6 vs Cat 6a) on Sep 02, 2020
Integrators are split between using Cat 5e, 6, and 6a but 2 of them have...
Avigilon ACC Cloud Tested on Jul 08, 2020
Avigilon merged Blue and ACC, adding VSaaS features to its on-premise VMS,...
Access Control Levels and Schedules Tutorial on Sep 29, 2020
Configuring access levels and setting up schedules is central to maintaining...
Top Video Surveillance Service Call Problems 2020 on Oct 23, 2020
3 primary and 4 secondary issues stood out as causing the most problems when...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all...
Dedicated Vs Converged IP Video Networks Statistics 2020 on Sep 10, 2020
Running one's video system on a converged network with other devices can save...
Ubiquiti Access Control Tested on Oct 21, 2020
Ubiquiti has become one of the most widely used wireless and switch providers...
Verkada Access Control Tested on Sep 09, 2020
Verkada raised $80 million earlier in 2020, expanding from video into access...
China's SMIC Hit By US Trade Restrictions, Impact On Video Surveillance on Oct 13, 2020
US trade restrictions have hit Semiconductor Manufacturing International...
Free Online NFPA, IBC, and ADA Codes and Standards 2020 on Sep 03, 2020
Finding applicable codes for security work can be a costly task, with printed...

Recent Reports

ISC Brasil Digital Experience 2020 Report on Oct 23, 2020
ISC Brasil 2020 rebranded itself to ISC Digital Experience and, like its...
Top Video Surveillance Service Call Problems 2020 on Oct 23, 2020
3 primary and 4 secondary issues stood out as causing the most problems when...
GDPR Impact On Temperature / Fever Screening Explained on Oct 22, 2020
What impact does GDPR have on temperature screening? Do you risk a GDPR fine...
Security And Safety Things (S&ST) Tested on Oct 22, 2020
S&ST, a Bosch spinout, is spending tens of millions of dollars aiming to...
Nokia Fever Screening Claims To "Advance Fight Against COVID-19" on Oct 22, 2020
First IBM, then briefly Clorox, and now Nokia becomes the latest Fortune 500...
Deceptive Meridian Temperature Tablets Endanger Public Safety on Oct 21, 2020
IPVM's testing of and investigation into Meridian Kiosk's temperature...
Honeywell 30 Series and Vivotek NVRs Tested on Oct 21, 2020
The NDAA ban has driven many users to look for low-cost NVRs not made by...
Ubiquiti Access Control Tested on Oct 21, 2020
Ubiquiti has become one of the most widely used wireless and switch providers...
Avigilon Aggressive Trade-In Program Takes Aim At Competitors on Oct 20, 2020
Avigilon has launched one of the most aggressive trade-in programs the video...
Mexico Video Surveillance Market Overview 2020 on Oct 20, 2020
Despite being neighbors, there are key differences between the U.S. and...
Dahua Revenue Grows But Profits Down, Cause Unclear on Oct 20, 2020
While Dahua's overall revenue was up more than 12% in Q3 2020, a significant...
Illegal Hikvision Fever Screening Touted In Australia, Government Investigating, Temperature References Deleted on Oct 20, 2020
The Australian government told IPVM that they are investigating a Hikvision...
Panasonic Presents i-PRO Cameras and Video Analytics on Oct 19, 2020
Panasonic i-PRO presented its X-Series cameras and AI video analytics at the...
Augmented Reality (AR) Cameras From Hikvision and Dahua Examined on Oct 19, 2020
Hikvision, Dahua, and other China companies are marketing augmented reality...
18 TB Video Surveillance Drives (WD and Seagate) on Oct 19, 2020
Both Seagate and Western Digital recently announced 18TB hard drives...