STP vs UTP for Video Surveillance Tutorial

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Dec 20, 2017

For many video system designers, deciding which ethernet cabling to use is a quick decision: go with the cheapest. However, this overlooks the possibility cable, and the video it carries, needs extra protection against common electromagnetic interference.

STP vs UTP for Video Surveillance

Is the difference between cable types that significant? In this note, we examine shielded cable, look at how it can prevent video problems, and compare it to nonshielded alternatives.

Inside this note, we explain:

  • How Electrical Interference Affects Video Quality
  • What Shielded Cable Looks Like Compared To UTP
  • Physical Differences Between Cable Types
  • Other Names For STP
  • Typical STP vs UTP Costs
  • Use STP Against Common Sources of Interference
  • Practical Use Is Limited, But Axis Disagrees

One Of Many Cable Tutorial Series

This tutorial is one of a number IPVM has addressing the topic of cabling. Others include: Cat 5e vs. Cat 6 for IP Cameras, Cabling Best Practices Guide, Network Cable Testing Guide, Grounding and Bonding for Video Surveillance, and more.

*** **** ***** ****** designers, ******** ***** ******** cabling ** *** ** a ***** ********:** **** *** ********. *******, **** ********* the *********** *****, *** the ***** ** *******, needs ***** ********** ******* common *************** ************.

STP vs UTP for Video Surveillance

** *** ********** ******* cable ***** **** ***********? In **** ****, ** examine ******** *****, **** at *** ** *** prevent ***** ********, *** compare ** ** *********** alternatives.

****** **** ****, ** explain:

  • *** ********** ************ ******* Video *******
  • **** ******** ***** ***** Like ******** ** ***
  • ******** *********** ******* ***** Types
  • ***** ***** *** ***
  • ******* *** ** *** Costs
  • *** *** ******* ****** Sources ** ************
  • ********* *** ** *******, But **** *********

One ** **** ***** ******** ******

**** ******** ** *** of * ****** **** has ********** *** ***** of *******. ****** *******:*** ** **. *** 6 *** ** *******,******* **** ********* *****,******* ***** ******* *****,********* *** ******* *** Video ************, *** ****.

[***************]

Electrical ************ ******* ***** *******

** *** ***** ************ world, *** ******** ** often ** ******* *** NVRs, *** ****** ********* to *** ******* ** between. **** ***** ******* problems *****, ** *** be * *********** ******** to **** ****** *** tweak ********, **** ** discover ******** *** ***** present.

*******, ****** * **** look ** ******* *** resolve ********* ******. **** the ******* ** *** image *****:

********** ************ ** *** cabling ****** ***** **** type ** *******. *** only **** *** ***** transmit ******** **** *******, but ** **** *** attract *** ******** ********* 'noise'. * ******** ***** can ***** ** ** 'ad-hoc *******' ***** ********* why ***** ********* ** sometimes ********.

'STP' ** ********** ***** *********

* ***** ******** ********** between *********** *** *** STP, ** '******** ******* pair' ******* ******* *** primary ***********. *** ***** below ***** *** ********** metallic **** ********* *********** wire ***** ** ***:

'*********' ****** *** ** confused **** '***** *********' where * ****** ***** or ******** **** ** mesh ****** *** ****** bundle ** *****. ***** the ******** ** ************ wrap ***** ****** ***** wrap *** ****** ****** shares **** ** *** same ********, **** *** not ********** ** *** other *** ****** ** different ***********.

Other ***** *** ***

*** ****** ************ *** shielded ******* **** *****, 'STP', ** ********* ****** 'U/FTP' *** '**********/****-******** ******* pair' ** '*/***' *** 'Shielded/Foil-screened ******* ****' *******. Especially *** ********** ******* specifications, **** *** *** these ********* ************* ** describe ******** *******. *******, in ******* ***, *** 'STP' ************ ** **** widely ****.

Physical *********** ******* ***** *****

*** ********* **** ********** the ******** *********** ******* UTP *** ***.

  • ******** **** ******:* **** ***** ** foil, ******** ********, ********* wire *****. **** ***** is ***** ****** *** 'drain', *** **** ** properly **********. ******* ** adequately ****** *** ***** can ******* *** ******** that *** ******** ** mitigate.
  • ******* ******:*** ***** ****** ** foil ******** *** ****** add ******** ** *** cable ******. ** * result, * ******* ******* insulating ****** ** ******, which **** ********. *******, STP ** ******* *** thicker ******** ** ***, and *** ** **** difficult ** ******* ** a ******.
  • *****, **** ******, *** Groundwires:********* ** *** ***** manufacturer *** ***** ** STP, ***** ******** *** be ******* *** ******** found ** *** *******. This ******** ******* ******* 'core' ******, ******* ** aid ********* *** ******, and ********** ********** ********* wires. ***** ** ** outdoor ***** ***** **** a ****** **** **** separates *** ***** **** quadrants ****** *** ******.

STP ** *** ********** ***********

***** ********** ******** ******** provide *** **** ********** that *** **** *** possess.

  • *** **********:*** ******* ********* ** shielding ** ********** **** environmental*************** ************, ** ***. ******* each **** ** ************ wrapped, *** ******* *** ambient ************ ** ******** and ***** **** *** cable ** ************* ********* or **********.
  • ******** **** *****: ************ *** ** a '***-*** ******' ** that ********** ******* ** a ****** ****** ** interference. ** **** ************, like ********* ******* ******* or *************, ****** ******** cabling *** ** * uncontrolled ******* *** ************ that ****** ***** *********** off. *****, *** ******** of **** ********* ********* or ********** **** *******.

Cost **********

***** *** **** ******* $20 ** $** *** camera ******** ** *** cabling, ******** ***** **** of *** ****, ***** on *** ***** ***** ~40% **** **** *** and ********* ** *** much ********** ***** ** larger ******* ** ****** for *** ******, ******* and **** ***** ***.

Use *** ******* ****** ******* ** ************

******, *** ****** ** used ***** ************ ***** be * *******. ** firm ** ***** ***** places ******** *** *****, here *** **** ****** where ************ ***** ****** video *******:

******** ** **** ******* Wiring

***** ****** *** ********* with **** ************ **** run ******** ** ** too **** **** *****. Even ****** *** * compliant ******** ***** ****** a ******** ******* *** be * ****** ** video ************.

***** ** **** ************* exists *** **** ** use *** ** **** situation *** *****, **** practices ** **** ********** design ****** **** *** data ******* ******* *** same *******, ********** ** how ** ** ********* in*** ** *******, **** ** *** using *** *****.

**** ********* *******

**** ******* *** **** common ***************** ******** **** electric ******, ***** ************, magnetic *****, ** ********* can ********* *********** ***. Especially *** ********** **********, where ***** ******* *** common, ********* ***** **** is ** ********* **********.

***** ******* *** ************* by ***** '*********' **********, ** ***** reliance ** ******** ****** for *********. ***** ********* to ******* **** **** equipment, *********** ****, **** maglocks, ********** **********, *** industrial ********* *** ******** enough ************ ** ******* video *******.

*** *******/****** *******

****** *** ******* ************* radios ******* **** ************. While * ***** ******* may *** ** *********** enough ** ** * problem, ******** **** **** near **** ******* ********* or ************ ****** ** run ***** *** ** eliminate ********.

**************** ********

*** ** *** ******* sources ** *** *** common ***** ********. ***** the ****** ********** ** ethernet ****** ******* ******** of ***** ********, ** cabling ****** ** *** in ****** ***** ***** on*******, ** ****** ** run ***** *** *****.

**** *****, ***** *** many ********* ***** ******** 'installed ** ******' ** to ** **** *** video. ** **** *****, cabling ********** ********* ** the ****** ** ***** quality ******** **** ****** unfixed ***** *** ***** network ** *********.

Practical *** ** *******

** *** **********, *** vast ******** ** *** surveillance ******** ******* *** been *** ***** ***, and ** **** ** significant ****** ** ******. Since ********** ******** **** the *********** ****** ** imperatively ************ ** ********** and ********** ****** "**** practices [**** ** ****** available]", ** ** ********* suitable *** ***** ******* design.

Axis: ********* *** *** ********

******** ***** **** ************** declared *** ** *** mandatory *** ******* ******* per *** ********* ********** [link ** ****** *********]:

"*** ************** ** ** deploy ** *** ******* cable ** ********* ********** environments. ******** ** ********* indoor ************ *** ***** the ******* ***** ** located ** ******** **** electrical ***** ****** ****** or ***** ***** ********* loads **** ** ****** or ********** *** ** close ******** ** *** camera ** *** *****.It ** **** ********* to use an STP cable where the camera is used outdoors or where the network cable is routed outdoors."

**** ** * **** statement ***** ****~**% ** *** ******* are ********* *******. ********* ****' ************** may ***** * *********** increase ** ******* ******* cost *** ** ****** overkill ******** ** ****** problems *****.

******, *** ********** ********* with *** *********** *********** of ***. *** ******** use ** *** ** where ******** ** *** in *** '**** ****' areas ********** *****.

Test **** *********

***** ****** **** * * questions ****

[****: **** ******** *** originally ********* ** **** and ************* ******* ** 2017]

Comments (23)

Cabling infrastructure properly designed and installed can eliminate a lot of the issues seen in the field with IPVS.  BICSI is the global organization that drives standards and best practices in the structured cabling industry.  If your not familiar with them, they are worth checking out.

Unfortunately a lot of bad habits surfaced when the industry transitioned from analog systems to IP systems.  Installations best practices that worked for RG-6, will not work for UTP/STP systems.  Performance verification is not always required for many IPVS installs, compared to traditional data installs.  Improper pathways, mismatching components, poor field terminations, all contribute to poor IPVS installations.

While I understand the benefits of an STP cabling system, I don't believe it's necessary for all outdoor cameras.  STP components are far more costly, and more labor intensive to install.  It's not just the cable, but the patch panels, jacks, and patch cords as well.  This will add additional expense when compared to a properly designed UTP installation.

IP data is IP data.  Video requires reliable and timely delivery.  On the network we can apply QoS settings and other advanced networking features to ensure timely delivery of multiple traffic types, but if the packets don't transport reliability across the infrastructure it's a moot point at best.

It's not just the cable, but the patch panels, jacks, and patch cords as well. This will add additional expense when compared to a properly designed UTP installation.

 

Exactly, all of that is important because the cable must be properly grounded or the shielding can work as an antenna - improper grounding of STP can cause worse conditions than just running the cheaper, easier UTP.

...the cable must be properly grounded or the shielding can work as an antenna - improper grounding of STP can cause worse conditions...

But just on the switch side of the cable, right?

Yes, as I understand it (and I am no cable expert) grounding at the switch, or patch panel side is all that is required.  Grounding both sides can cause ground loops but these tend to be on power-cycle frequencies which don't interfere much with Ethernet communications.  Having said that it is better to avoid ground loops altogether so why go through the extra work of grounding the jack end?

Grounding is done on one end only, although the specific end "field device vs switch" often varies according to manufacturer.

For example, many (access) reader manufacturers specify grounding at the reader, not the controller, or switch.  Some camera manufacturers, especially PTZs, include ground taps in the enclosure.

In general, the ground is more reliable if done at the switch rack, via TSB or some other central maintained earth ground.

As an FYI, we are prepping a test that looks at STP vs UTP shield effectiveness.  We will subject UTP and STP connected cameras to some nasty EMI to see what differences can be seen.  Look for that next month!

Thanks for the comment.  We refer to those BICSI guidelines and recommendations in our BICSI For IP Video Surveillance Guide and IP Networking course, and the 'best practices' aspect is useful. 

Installers should buy or find a copy of the TDMM even if the local AHJ has no idea what it is.

 Installers should buy or find a copy of the TDMM...

Just don’t take Ethan’s copy:

 

Thanks Brian.  I've been a BICSI RCDD for over 15 years... great training... great organization.  Agreed... every installer should have a copy of the TDMM as a reference manual if nothing else.  Merry Christmas!

RCDD = "really cool data dude"

Basic BICI knowledge will tell you that most signal current is carried by the outer surface of each copper conductor.  Not down the center so it makes it difficult to keep it from being interfered with.  Biggest give away is running cable in parallele with other type of cable.  Including inside conduit.

Problem we have is on large jobs the electrical contractor runs their own low voltage then hire a security integrator to finish the hand and bang portion.  In some cases the low voltage guy is only making 12% profit.  So if their is a mistake he can eat it big time.  So they will go the less expensive route.  Less expensive in Labor time and call backs.

I have seen security contractors use the local big cable house to run all the low voltage infrastructure then they can price their portion cheaper than the contractor/integrator that has all the work done in-house.

Back home in Europe we always called cable by type, like utp or ftp, etc. By default, it means you talking about cat 5e cable. If you need cat6, 6a, 7 for some reason, you just specify category as well.

when I moved to Canada, I figured, that most of the installers never heard about data cable types (utp is the only one) and they believe that cat5e is a cable for 100mbps and cat6 is for gigabit

 Other Names For STP

Yes, one may be best off using the full specifier instead of ‘STP’ considering the many different uses:

There is an recomendation about analog cameras?

If I'm using a TP cable with baluns, have I use an STP cable to outdoor cameras?

Welcome, thanks for the question.

Because 'shielding' protects digital signals (EMI) differently than analog (signal loss), the importance is not for video quality as much as it is for cable run length.

As a point of illustration, coax cable is shielded by design, and the effectiveness of the shield corresponds to signal loss.  Thicker/more dense shielding (ie: RG6) versus thinner (ie: RG59) results in less loss over the length of cable runs.

In the case of twisted-pair/baluns like you describe, shielding would reduce signal loss, although the fact the wire is twisted to begin with also helps. 

Because 'shielding' protects digital signals (EMI) differently than analog (signal loss), the importance is not for video quality as much as it is for cable run length.

At least from a theoretical perspective, I would think the opposite, as far as video quality is concerned.

With analog, any noise that makes its way into the cable, and is not filtered out by common-mode-rejection will be present in the picture as artifact.

With digital, even the noise that makes it past CMR will usually be corrected/discarded by the reciever as it turns varying voltage levels into 1’s and 0’s.  It’s only the extreme noise that manifests in a digital signal.

IMHO.

*Edit: To clarify, I’m saying that the effect of STP on the analog signal quality is as important as that of run length.  Not that STP doesnt improve digital quality as well.

 

I am saying that an aspect of analog transmission - signal loss - comes into play sooner and is more important to address first rather than video quality.

Signal is lost no matter the external video quality EMI impacts.  Shielding helps mitgate this loss.

 

Shielding helps prevent EMI (electrical magnetic interference).  Signal loss is caused by attenuation (loss as the signal strength travels the length of the transmission cable).  When it comes to coax or STP cable, both of these properties come into play.

STP cable will by default provide greater EMI protection over UTP cable, regardless of where installed (indoors or outdoors).  Cable twist reduces pair-to-pair cross-talk, which is signal jumping between the pairs within the cable jacket.  Attenuation can be reduced by using a thicker gauge wire.  Example, 24 gauge wire will have less attenuation that 26 gauge wire because of it's electrical properties.  With high end UTP cable, some products use 24 ga and some use 26 ga.  This is generally found in Category 6 rated cable and higher only.

Coax is a great medium for analog signals because of its robust shield and the physical size of it's conductor.  The challenge always was the cost of the material, cable path fill, bend radius, and home run design requirements.  UTP with baluns can help solve many of these short comings, and provide a future infrastructure upgrade path to IP camera connectivity.

I'm not disagreeing with Brian, just diving deeper into the weeds.

UTP with baluns can help solve many of these short comings, and provide a future infrastructure upgrade path to IP camera connectivity.

 

I read somewhere years ago that UTP is recommended over STP when using baluns. I don't remember if it was a creditable source or the reasoning behind it. We have done it both ways without a problem in the past. 

Shields need to be grounded.  If the shields are not grounded properly, they effectively become antennas for EMI with no where to go.  This might be the idea behind the recommendation you cite.  Just a guess.

It was something to that nature. But more along the lines of causing some type of self interference, not from an outside source. 

Either way, the few times we used STP and baluns, the shield never got grounded. 

Before I knew anything about codes, best practices, and what shielded or unshielded cable even meant, I worked for a company doing a lot of old work wiring. We would run wire breaking every rule in the book, twice, on the same 500' run. Looking back at it, it is surprising that we never really had problems other than the horrible connections we crimped using some primitive tools provided to us. 

And even now the only major problem I can think of concerning interference is the little AC/DC transformer wall worts. 

John you should start a pole to find out where others have found specific examples. I'm not much of a book person. 

Axis reasoning for STP outdoors is more than likely trying to protect their equipment. Not so much preventing interference.  Netonix provides some good hands on advise with outdoor cabling in this respect. It's specific to communication towers, but still relevant for outdoor camera runs. And backed by actual field experience.

 

Surges from Static, ESD, or ground potential shifts will take the shortest less resistive path like your Ethernet cable unless you provide a dedicated ground path that is of less resistance and shorter run to ground than your Ethernet cable - THINK SERVICE LOOPS

Login to read this IPVM report.

Related Reports

Converged vs Dedicated Networks For Surveillance Tutorial on Feb 12, 2020
Use the existing network or deploy a new one? This is a critical choice in...
NetApp Video Surveillance Profile on Mar 09, 2020
NetApp is increasing its efforts in video surveillance and told IPVM...
Last Chance - Spring 2020 IP Networking Course - Register Now on May 06, 2020
This is the last chance to register for the only networking course designed...
Avigilon ACC Cloud Tested on Jul 08, 2020
Avigilon merged Blue and ACC, adding VSaaS features to its on-premise VMS,...
BICSI For IP Video Surveillance Guide on Feb 11, 2020
Spend enough time around networks and eventually someone will mention BICSI,...
Hazardous & Explosion Proof Access Control Tutorial on Feb 27, 2020
Controlling access to hazardous environments requires equipment meeting...
Hanwha Wisenet X Plus PTRZ Tested on Feb 14, 2020
Hanwha has released their PTRZ camera, the Wisenet X Plus XNV-6081Z, claiming...
Remote Network Access for Video Surveillance Guide on Jul 27, 2020
Remotely accessing surveillance systems is key in 2020, with more and more...
VSaaS 101 on Mar 25, 2020
Video Surveillance as a Service (VSaaS) is the common industry term for cloud...
TVT / InVid White Light Camera Tested Vs Hikvision ColorVu on Mar 18, 2020
With mega China manufacturers Dahua and Hikvision facing both bans and human...
Use Access Control Logs To Constrain Coronavirus on Apr 09, 2020
Access control users have included capabilities that are not commonly used...
Vehicle Gate Access Control Guide on Mar 19, 2020
Vehicle gate access control demands integrating various systems to keep...
Video Surveillance Business 101 on Mar 30, 2020
This report explains the fundamental elements of the video surveillance...
TVT Temperature Measurement Terminal Tested on Jul 23, 2020
While Dahua and Hikvision get the most attention for China temp products,...
Uniview Deep Learning Camera Tested on Jul 14, 2020
Uniview's intrusion analytics have performed poorly in our shootouts. Now,...

Recent Reports

Genetec CEO Declares "We Don't Negotiate Payment With Patent Trolls" on Aug 11, 2020
Are patent trolls like terrorists? Genetec's CEO is coming out strongly...
Hanwha AI Analytics Camera Tested on Aug 11, 2020
Hanwha has released their Wisenet P AI camera, adding person and vehicle...
Alabama Schools Million Dollar Hikvision Fever Camera Deal on Aug 11, 2020
The Baldwin County, Alabama public schools purchased a $1 million, 144-camera...
Dahua Taunts Australian Government, Continues To Sell Illegal Fever Cameras on Aug 10, 2020
Dahua is effectively taunting the Australian government by continuing to sell...
HID Releases VertX Replacement Aero on Aug 10, 2020
HID is replacing two established and broadly supported types of access...
NDAA Compliant Video Surveillance Whitelist on Aug 10, 2020
This report aggregates video surveillance products that manufacturers have...
Telpo China Temperature Tablets Tested on Aug 10, 2020
The provider for overseas companies ranging from Canon Singapore to US'...
Dangerous Hikvision Fever Camera Showcased by Chilean City on Aug 07, 2020
Deploying a fever camera outdoors, in the rain, with no black body, is...
"Grand Slam" For Pelco's PE Firm, A Risk For Motorola on Aug 07, 2020
The word "Pelco" and "grand slam" have not been said together for many years....
FLIR Stock Falls, Admits 'Decelerating' Demand For Temperature Screening on Aug 07, 2020
Is the boom going to bust for temperature screening? FLIR disappointed...
VSaaS Will Hurt Integrators on Aug 06, 2020
VSaaS will hurt integrators, there is no question about that. How much...
Dogs For Coronavirus Screening Examined on Aug 06, 2020
While thermal temperature screening is the surveillance industry's most...
ADT Slides Back, Disappointing Results, Poor Commercial Performance on Aug 06, 2020
While ADT had an incredible start to the week, driven by the Google...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all...
SIA Coaches Sellers on NDAA 889B Blacklist Workarounds on Aug 05, 2020
Last month SIA demanded that NDAA 899B "must be delayed". Now that they have...