Hikvision Most Polarizing Favorability Results

Author: Brian Karas, Published on Jan 05, 2017

Pro or con, integrators have an opinion on Hikvision.

Hikvision scored, by far, the lowest neutral levels on IPVM's favorability results, engendering both significant support and opposition.

In this note, we examine the numbers and numerous integrator comments explaining their positions.

*** ** ***, *********** **** ** ******* ** *********.

********* ******, ** ***, *** ****** ******* ****** ** ****'* favorability *******, *********** **** *********** ******* *** **********.

** **** ****, ** ******* *** ******* *** ******** ********** comments ********** ***** *********.

[***************]

Statistics ********

*** ******* ************ ******** *** * ******* ***** ** ~**% but **** **** **% **** ******* ***** *********. ** *** plus ****, ********* ****** ********** ***** ******* ******** *******, *** had *** ****** ***** ******** *****:

*****, ** ****** *** *** ******* *********** ******** *** ***** positive ** ******** ********* ** *********.

Attractive ******* / *****

********* ** ********* ***** *** ***** *** ******, *** *********** often ***** *** ***** / ***** **** ******** ** * key ********:

  • "********** ****** *** * ***** *****"
  • "**** ***** ** ***** ** *****/*******"
  • "**** ** ***** **** *** *****/*********** *****."
  • "**% **** ***, ** **** ***'* **** ** **% *** today."
  • "*** ** ******* *** *** ***** ************* ** ******* *** lower *****. *** *** ******** ****** ** ****** *********** **** the *** *** ****** *** **** *********."
  • "********* *** ****** *** * **** ***** *****."
  • "********** ********, **** *******."
  • "********** ******* *** ***** ******* ** ******."
  • "**** *********."
  • "********* *****, *** *********** ** **** ***** ** **** ** the ***** ****-*** *****. *** ****** *** ***** ***-****** ******* are ******** *** ******** **** ** *** ******."
  • "**** ****** ******* *** *** *****. *.***+ ***** ****."

*******

**** ******** **** ******** ********* ************ ********* ********** ** *******. In ******** ** ***** *****, ****** *******:

  • "******* **** *** * ***** ***** *****."
  • "*****, **** *******, ******** ********."
  • "****** ******* ******* *** ***. ***** *** ******* **** **** won't *** *** *****/****."
  • "***** **** **, **** *******, **** ***** *******."
  • "**** ******* *******, *** **** ** *******, *** *** ******** I **** ** * ***** *** ******** *****. ***** ** really **** ** **** **** **** ***** **** ******. ******** service ****** *'** *** **** *** *** ******* *******."
  • "**** *** ** **** ** ******* ** ***** *******. ***** built ** **** ** *** *********. * **** **** ** use **** ** ***** ** ********** *** *** ************* *** tight ******* * ****. **** ******* ** ****** **** ** well."
  • "**** ***** ** ***** ** *****/******* **** ********* ******* ** choice *** **** ********."

Proponents *** ********* ***** ********* *** *****

**** ***-********* *********** ******** ***********'* ******* ********** ******, *** **** ******** ************ ******* **** ** ** **** of *******, *** ******* ** *** *** ****** ** ****** them:

  • "*** ******* ***'* ***** ** * *** ********** *** *** enough *** ** ** ****** ******... ** ***** *** ***."
  • "******* *** **** **** ********* ** ********* ***** ** *** Chinese ***, ** **** **** ****, *** ** ******, *** best **** ** ******** ********* ** ****** *** *****, *** they *** ****** * ***** ***** ** ****."
  • "*'* *** * **** *** ** *** ******* ********** *********** in *** *******, *** **'* *** * ***********."

*** **********, ** **********, *** * ******* ********* ***** ******:

*** ******* ********** ********* ** ** ********* ***** ** ******* to *********, *** ** ** ******* ** *** ********, *** actually ** ****** ***********.

Opponents ********** ********* ** ********** *********

** ********, ******* ********** ********* *** *** *** ******* *** integrators **** * ******** ********:

  • "******* ********** ********* ** ***'* *** ** ***."
  • "********* *** ******* ** **** **'* ******* ** ********** ********* as ** ******** ****** ** ********* *****"
  • "******* ********* ** ******* **********"
  • "** ** *** ******* ********* *** ** *** ************ **** the ******* **********."
  • "******** **** ********** ********** ********* ******* ** * ******* ***** by * ********** **** **'** *** *** ** **** ***** warfare ****."
  • "******? ******* ************ *********"
  • "* ***'* **** **** **** *** * ******* ********** *******. It ***** * ******** **** *** ******** *********."
  • "**** ******** *** ***** ********* ********** ********* ** ** ******** significant ********* ******** **** *** *** ** *** ******. *** concerns **** **** ********** ********* ** **** *** **** ** requirements *** ******* (** **** ****** **** ******* *****-******* ****** loans) **** **** ******* ** ****** *********, *** ****** ** to ** **** ** * **** ** *** ********** ** get ***** ******* *** **** *** *****."
  • "***** ** ******* **********. **** * *** ****? **'** ***** use ****."
  • "* **** **** **** *** ******* ***** *** * ** not ***** ****."

Cyber ******** ********

***** ******** *** ****** * ***** *****, *** ********* *** had ******** ***************, ** ***** ******** ********** ************* ********, ******* *********** ********** ** **********.

  • "******** ******* ****"
  • "***** ****, ******** *****"
  • "********, ********, ********. *** *** ** ******* * ******** ******** with ******** **** *** *** ******?? **** **** **** ****** products, *** ** ****** ****** ***** ********** ********* ********."
  • "******** **** ********** ********** ********* ******* ** * ******* ***** by * ********** **** **'** *** *** ** **** ***** warfare ****."
  • "*** **** *** ******. ***** ***** **** ** *********. ***** security ** ***** *** *** ****** ****."
  • "******** *****."

Destroying *** ********

****-********* ********* **** **** *** ****** *** *** ****** **** as * *******, **** *********** **** **** ********* ** *********** or ********* **** ***** ******* *******.

  • "**** **** ***** **** *** ********** *** ************ ******** **** their ******** *** **********."
  • "******* ** *** ********. **** ** ****** ************."
  • "*** ******** *** ****** *******. ********* *******. **** ** *** bottom."
  • "** ******* **** *** ****** ***** ********* **** ****** *** damaging ** *** ******** ** * *****."
  • "**** *** ******* *** ****** **** *** *** ******."
  • "*** ******** ***** ****** ** **** *** **** *** *** industry ** * *****."

*******

***** ********* ** *** ************ ***** ***** **** ********** **** can *********** ** *****: ******* ********, **** ** **********, ******** high ******. *********'* ******* ********* - ********** ********* - ** significantly ******.

** *** **** ****, *** ***** ******* ************ ******* ******* that ********* *** *** **** * *********** ******* ** *********** with *** *********** ** *** ****** *** ******* *******. *** challenge ** ******* ***** ****** ******** **** ** *** **** can **** / ******** *** ********* *** ************* ********.

Comments (9)

If Hikvision were to ever fall behind on features, performance, or reliability, they would be dead quickly. This is due to the government ownership, that already makes them a no-go for many. If they have any major missteps in the future, it could be much more damaging for them, due to the government factor.

They already aren't the cheapest, and by far. Their Value Series is an affordable line for sure, but their Smart Series is world class and on par pricing wise, if not just a tad below the competition. They include more features for the dollar than many other brands.

The only other real, end to end, top to bottom competition is Axis and Avigilon. No one else is on their level. Avigilon is surely the best in class today, but Hikvision is a VMS away from closing that gap.

They already aren't the cheapest, and by far.

That is because you are comparing them against companies that have multiple of the following: no local 'factory' sales people, no local support, no local field engineers, poor brand, no parties, no free trips to China, etc. These things count for many, if not most, dealers. Otherwise everyone would just use Longse and call it a day.

their Smart Series is world class and on par pricing wise, if not just a tad below the competition.

Which competition? Dysfunctional Dahua or no presence Uniview? How about vs Axis, Avigilon, Sony, etc.? How does that pricing compare?

Which competition? Dysfunctional Dahua or no presence Uniview? How about vs Axis, Avigilon, Sony, etc.? How does that pricing compare?

I was referring to Axis and Avigilon. Hikvisions top line series are probably just a little less cost wise, but equal quality wise.

I'd disagree on this.

Look at Hik's top 1080p dome, which is 1/2", Darkfighter, and integrated IR, the DS-2CD4526FWD-IZH. It's under $600 online.

Avigilon is $1000 MSRP for a 2MP IR dome, or $1200 for 5MP which is actually a larger, more sensitive imager. Axis' 1/2" outdoor dome, the Q3615-VE, is almost $1200, and doesn't include IR. Both are clearly much more expensive.

Also look at 1080p PTZs. Hikvision's new 2MP smart series is ~$1500-1600 online. The Axis equivalent (Q6155-E) is almost $3000. I don't know what Avigilon's H4 PTZ pricing is like, but MSRP on their H3 2MP model was $3500.

Avigilon's H4 PTZ camera is $2660 and now has analytics and Lightcatcher.

MSRP for the Hikvision camera is way higher then Avigilon. Also, cost for the Hikvision 1080P is the same as the Avigilon 1080P camera. Higher end Hikvision is priced the same at most other manufacturers higher end gear.

Also, cost for the Hikvision 1080P is the same as the Avigilon 1080P camera.

So under $1500 for the Avigilon and selling for $2,660? That's old school margin :)

There are two state-owned enterprises that own 42% of the company, with other people and venture capital investors owning the rest, including private equity in Hong Kong. Then in the open stock market there are shareholders all over the place. Some of the shareholders are foreign investors, as well.

Equating a company partially owned by SOEs with the government itself is simply incorrect and misleading.

Have you ever heard of corporations created by the United States Congress called GSE's (Government Sponsored Enterprises); e.g, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Sallie Mae, FC Banks, Farmer Mac, etc....?

Johnny -

Thanks for your first comment on IPVM. Regarding Hikvision's government ownership, you have certainly summarized Hikvision's position well.

However, their position is incorrect and misleading. Our research shows this:

Do Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Sallie Mae, FC Banks, Farmer Mac, etc compete with foreign companies on their home turf? Hikvision is subsidized by their government not to make them competitive in China but rather with the goal of spreading their tentacles here.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Integrators

Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Pelco Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 11, 2019
Pelco had a significant favorability problem amongst integrators in our previous study (see 2016 Pelco results). Now, in the first edition of our...
The Battle For The VSaaS Market Begins 2019 - Alarm.com, Arcules, Eagle Eye, OpenEye, Qumulex, Verkada, More on Jan 02, 2019
2019 will be the year that VSaaS finally becomes a real factor for professional video surveillance. While Video Surveillance as a Service (VSaaS)...
US Gov China Ban Rules Process, SIA Lobbies Against 'Blacklisting', For 'Risk-Based Protocol' on Dec 27, 2018
Details have emerged about when the rules implementing the federal ban on Hikvision, Dahua, Huawei and others will be made public for official...
Top 2019 Trend - AI Video Analytics on Dec 10, 2018
160+ Integrators answered: What do you think the top industry trend will be in 2019? Why? AI / video analytics was the run-away winner with...
ADT Wins Fire Death Suit But Faces Appeal on Dec 05, 2018
ADT/Protection 1 has won a wrongful death court case in which it was sued by the estate of a deceased customer. However, the attorney for the...
ADT Promotes DIFY - "Do It For You" on Nov 30, 2018
"Do It Yourself" (DIY) is a popular expression and has become such a common word that it has even made the Cambridge English dictionary. But why...
Strong Outlook For 2019 on Nov 29, 2018
Integrators are bullish for 2019, with nearly 80% showing a positive outlook in our integrator results from 160+ respondents: This is almost...
Cybersecurity Insurance For Security Integrators on Nov 29, 2018
Most security industry professionals carry insurance to cover themselves in the event of a general loss. However, most are not carrying cyber...
HID Product Configurator Examined on Nov 26, 2018
HID is widely used. However, figuring out all the different configurations of features for a final credential or reader part number can be a real...

Most Recent Industry Reports

The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have not only been big buzzwords over the past decade, but they have also become core features of video...
NYPD Refutes False SCMP Hikvision Story on Jan 18, 2019
The NYPD has refuted the SCMP Hikvision story, the Voice of America has reported. On January 11, 2018, the SCMP alleged that the NYPD was using...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Access Control Records Maintenance Guide on Jan 16, 2019
Weeding out old entries, turning off unused credentials, and updating who carries which credentials is as important as to maintaining security as...
UK Fines Security Firms For Illegal Direct Marketing on Jan 16, 2019
Two UK security firms have paid over $200,000 in fines for illegally making hundreds of thousands of calls to people registered on a government...
Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact