Axis Launches Next Gen Zipstream
By: IPVM Team, Published on Jun 21, 2016
Read this IPVM report for free.
This article is part of IPVM's 6,363 reports, 854 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.
Related Reports
Video Surveillance History
on May 06, 2020
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to an emerging AI cloud era.
The goal of this history is...
H.265 Usage Statistics
on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
Spring 2019 50+ New Products Directory
on Apr 08, 2019
We are compiling a list of new products for Spring 2019 and have over 50 already.
Contrast to Fall 2018 New Products Directory and Spring 2018...
Smart Codec Guide
on Feb 01, 2018
"Smart Codec" was once seemingly a marketing buzzword, but in 2020, nearly all new camera models include this tehcnology.
These marketing names...
2018 Video Surveillance Cameras Overview
on Dec 11, 2017
This report concisely explains the developments for surveillance cameras offered in 2017 and the state of offerings going into 2018, including...
Smart Codec Usage Surges - 2017 Statistics
on Oct 25, 2017
Smart codec usage has surged in 2017, new IPVM statistics show.
Smart codecs are less than three years old, starting in 2015 with Axis. Now, smart...
Ubiquiti FrontRow Camera Tested
on Aug 24, 2017
Ubiquiti is famous for low-cost wireless network equipment, a common choice for wireless video surveillance applications. The company has expanded...
Axis Zipstream 2 Tested
on Oct 03, 2016
Smart codecs are one of the big trends in the industry now.
Axis was the first manufacturer to launch a smart codec, releasing Zipstream in Spring...
Dahua Smart H.264+ Tested
on Aug 17, 2016
The smart codec trend continues, with Dahua adding Smart H.264+ to many of their models in new firmware.
In this test we see how it performs and...
Most Recent Industry Reports
Access Control Online Show - July 2020 - With 40+ Manufacturers - Register Now
on Jul 01, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our July 2020 Access Control Show. With 40+ companies presenting across 4 days, this is a unique opportunity to hear...
Hanwha Face Mask Detection Tested
on Jul 01, 2020
Face mask detection or, more specifically lack-of-face-mask detection, is an expanding offering in the midst of coronavirus. Hanwha in partnership...
UK Government Says Fever Cameras "Unsuitable"
on Jul 01, 2020
The UK government's medical device regulator, MHRA, told IPVM that fever-seeking thermal cameras are "unsuitable for this purpose" and recommends...
Camera Course Summer 2020
on Jun 30, 2020
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing.
Lots of manufacturer training...
Worst Over But Integrators Still Dealing With Coronavirus Problems (June Statistics)
on Jun 30, 2020
While numbers of integrators very impacted by Coronavirus continue to drop, most are still moderately dealing with the pandemic's problems, June...
FLIR Screen-EST Screening Software Tested
on Jun 30, 2020
In our FLIR A Series Test, the cameras' biggest drawback was their lack of face detection, requiring manual adjustment when screening each...
Dahua Buenos Aires Bus Screening Violates IEC Standards and Dahua's Own Instructions
on Jun 30, 2020
Dahua has promoted Buenos Aires bus deployments as "solutions that facilitate community safety". However, they violate IEC standards and,...
UK Firm Markets False Fever Screening, Hikvision Disavows
on Jun 30, 2020
A UK security firm falsely claimed its Hikvision-based thermal solution could be used for "accurately detecting fever in any person", even claiming...
Industry Study: 83% of US Temperature Screening Sellers Falsely Say Not Medical Devices
on Jun 29, 2020
83% of US companies selling temperature screening devices, aka 'fever' detectors, claim they are not medical devices, contrary to FDA definition,...
Manufacturers on Virtual 'ISC West' 2020 and Potential ISC West 2021
on Jun 29, 2020
With the 2020 ISC West show now officially canceled, attention turns to Reed's new "ISC West 2020 Virtual Event" planned for October and for the...
Comments (23)
Ross Vander Klok
This is huge for us. Zipstream alone is huge for us, but as they refine it further it is truly going to be a game changer. Even though bandwidth is not an issue (as in we have plenty) our IT staff continues to push us to lower our usage.
Create New Topic
Undisclosed #1
Can't this already be done with Zipstream, albeit crudely, thru a VMSes speed up on motion mechanism?
Create New Topic
Undisclosed #1
So the green is without Zipstream and the black is with DFPS Zipstream?
Where's the same comparison from New Zip to Old Zip? Isn't that what we need to see to evaluate how much of an improvement there is?
I think that they are wringing out a damp sponge at this point.
Sure 50% sounds great, but as you say the savings are greatest when the activity is least. And since the dynamic GOP can already be set to drastically reduce those times to little more than the motion difference between the frames, I'm thinking that the savings might not be very much at all when you are already cranking the GOP up.
Is that a graph that they showed at one time with the old zip?
Create New Topic
Undisclosed Manufacturer #3
I would be interested to know if anyone has had any experience with Indigovision SMART.core in this regard? As I understand it Indigovision has done something in this area for a while.
Create New Topic
Undisclosed Manufacturer #4
DFPS is soundingly awfully like what Dedicated Micros used to call Multimode:
MultiMode Recording - Dynamically-switchable resolution, record-rate & compression (MPEG-4/H.264/JPEG) settings
Maybe Mike is going to return as a patent troll ?
A feature like this is quite suitable for in cam edge recording where there is little live monitoring and only event based after the fact viewing. Limited storage, limited life of storage, but still having a 24/7 chain of evidence and not requiring a centralised NVR.
Create New Topic
Brad Silvernail
This is a huge improvement. Now we need someway to predict the benefits when sizing storage. Most NVR storage calculators are way behind the camera / codec technology. This puts more emphasis on our "guess-timating" and accepting the risk if we undersize the storage. Any ideas or help?
Create New Topic
Undisclosed #1
Another possibly less risky and more beneficial approach to Axis version of dynamic frame rate would be to implement VMS based frame rate paring.
The way this would work would be that the camera would transmit at full rate always, along with its motion meta-data. The VMS would record at full rate.
After a suitable period of time has elapsed, (normally corresponding to the first order review time, 48 hours for instance), those streams with little motion would be retroactively reduced based on a similar algorithm to the one used by Axis.
This has the advantage of providing the full frame rate video during the time period when it's most likely to be needed. The overall storage reduction is nearly the same, adding only the extra storage for those 48 hours. Also an automatic mechanism could be added to prevent such reduction if the footage has ever been reviewed in that period.
Server side proceessing of the reduction could take place in the background, during the low utilization periods corresponding with high dynamic GOP.
One caveat, for this to work on h.264 efficiently and without decoding, svc-t encoding or its equivalent would have to be implemented at the camera. Hikvision and Dahua have this option on some lines today.
Create New Topic