Axis Launches Next Gen Zipstream

Author: IPVM Team, Published on Jun 21, 2016

Smart codecs are one of the most important emerging surveillance technology trends.

Axis was the first, launching Zipstream in Spring 2015 but was quickly followed by Hikvision H.264+, Panasonic Smart Coding and more every month.

Now, Axis is pushing forward with its next generation smart codec that has the potential to further reduce bandwidth by another 50%.

In this report, we examine what Axis is doing, its potential impact and how it matches up against competitors like Avigilon and Hikvision..

***** ********* *** ** *** **** ********* ******** ************ ********** ******.

**** *** *** *****, ********* ********* ** ****** **** *** was ******* ******** *********** *.***+,********* ***** ********* **** ***** *****.

***, **** ** ******* ******* **** *** **** ********** ***** ***** that *** *** ********* ** ******* ****** ********* ** ******* 50%.

** **** ******, ** ******* **** **** ** *****, *** potential ****** *** *** ** ******* ** ******* *********** **** Avigilon *** *********..

[***************]

Dynamic ***** **** - *** *** *******

**** *** ***** ******* ***** **** (****) ** *********, ******** *** frame **** ** **** *** **** ***** ** ****** ********. While **** ****** ** *** *****, ** ** ***** ******** with ********'* ******* ***** *********** *** ******* *-***** *********, ** ******* massive ********* *******.

***, ********* *** *********** ***** ***** ***** *** ***-******** *****. ********* varies ***** ** *** ******** *****, ** *** ***** *** a ***** ****** ** ******** ** *** **** **** ***** to *****, ***** * **** ****** ***** **** ** * hallway *** **** ** *** ** ****.

** *** ********* *****, **** ***** *** * ******* ********* (** black) ***** ****** ******** ******** ** * ******** *** ******* (in *****):

**** ********* ***** ***** **** ********:

**** *** ** ******* (** ***) ************* ** *** ******** compression *** * ***** ********. ** *** ***** *******, ***** is ** ******** *** * ***** ** ******* ***** **** and *** *** ** **** ** *. **** **** * future ******** ******* **** *** ****.

************

*** *** ********* **** **** **** ** ********* ** *** next ***** ******** **** *** *.** ********.

Original ********* ******* ***********

*** ******** **** ********* **** ****** ************* ******* ** **%+ ***********, **** **** **** ******* compression *** * ***** ********.

**** ** * ********** **** *** ********** *****-* ****:

Projected ********* ******* *** ***

** ***** **** ******* ** *** ******** (********, **********, ***** after *****, ***.), *** ******** ** **** **** ****** **** ********* by ******* **% ** **.

** **** ******, ** *** *********** * *****, ***** *********, even *** ** *****, ** ********* ******** **********.

Motion ***** ********* ***********

******* ********* ** ********* *** ***** ********* ** ****** ********** recording ******* ** ******-***** *********, ******* ****** ** ******** ***** storage ******.

******-**** ********* *** **** * **** *** ********* **** ****** stores **** *** ** ******* ** ********** ******. ** * customer ******* ****** **** **** ******* ** * *****, ***** may ** ** ***** ******** (** *** ***** ** *****, there *** **** **** ** ********, *** **** ******* ** trigger * *********), * * *** ***** ****** *** ** ********** to ***** ** ******** *** *** ***** ** *******.

** *** ***** ****, **** ***** **** ****** ** ******** frame **** ** ***. *** *****, ********* **** ** *** a ***.

Avigilon **** ***** **** **********

**** ***** * ***** ********* ** ******** ****. ***, **** has ***** *** *** *** ********* ******* **** ******** ***** (DFPS ** *** ***** ********** ** ******** **** ***** ****) but **** **** *** **** ***** ***** ******* ***** ******** has ****.

Hikvision *.***+ **********

***** *.***+ ****** ********* ******* ***** *** *** ** **** Zipstream, **** *** *** **-****** **** **** *** ******** ** DFPS. ** ******, ********* ** * **** ******** ** ** is ***** ****** ********* ** **** / ** ********* ******* suite.

Overall ****** ******

*** *** **** ****, ************ **** ******** *********, ** **** ******** **** ***** ****** *** ** ********* trend. *** ******** ** **** ** ** *********** *******, ****** not ** *********** ** *** ******** *********, ** *** ******* **** in ******** ********* *********** *** ******* *********** ** ***** ***** advances ** **** ******.

****

Comments (23)

This is huge for us. Zipstream alone is huge for us, but as they refine it further it is truly going to be a game changer. Even though bandwidth is not an issue (as in we have plenty) our IT staff continues to push us to lower our usage.

Can't this already be done with Zipstream, albeit crudely, thru a VMSes speed up on motion mechanism?

Yes, at least within Milestone. I can't speak to any others. However, this will likely decrease the processor load on the server in making that decision.

So the green is without Zipstream and the black is with DFPS Zipstream?

Where's the same comparison from New Zip to Old Zip? Isn't that what we need to see to evaluate how much of an improvement there is?

I think that they are wringing out a damp sponge at this point.

Sure 50% sounds great, but as you say the savings are greatest when the activity is least. And since the dynamic GOP can already be set to drastically reduce those times to little more than the motion difference between the frames, I'm thinking that the savings might not be very much at all when you are already cranking the GOP up.

Is that a graph that they showed at one time with the old zip?

That's original zip vs new zip.

Original zip with dynamic GOP?

Because those I-frames look very undynamic even as the activity varies greatly. Also, notice how dynamic they are in the black.

Even though they are close in the spots you point out there is a noticeable difference. Multiply that across a few hundred cameras and it turns into a large difference.

Ross, before we get to what the graph means, we need to know what it is actually comparing. I'm pointing out the spikes only to show the the graph, IMHO, is comparing the new Zipstream with no Zipstream.

The spikes are I-frames; their regularly spaced presence indicates that one set of data does NOT have dynamic GOP enabled.

That's all I am showing with arrows. I could be totally wrong about the savings being small, but John didn't say that (yet), instead he questioned one of my assumptions, i.e. the the graph is showing Zip vs no Zip, where he believes it is Zip vs old Zip.

What do you think it is comparing?

I took it to be old zip to the new zip, but I see what you mean. Could easily be new to none.

To me, this old graph makes it clear that the new graph is DFPS vs nothing, especially the top line. What do you think?

I need to check with Axis.

This chart is "Zipstream Disabled" vs "DFPS"

I would be interested to know if anyone has had any experience with Indigovision SMART.core in this regard? As I understand it Indigovision has done something in this area for a while.

According to IndigoVision's website:

SMART.core has Activity Controlled Frame-rate and saves you huge amounts of storage costs. Dozing along at 1fps when there is no activity, it launches instantly into a full alert mode of 30fps when there is. Storage savings can be up to 90%.

This description is similar to DFPS except that DFPS can dynamically adjust frame rates in between (i.e., not just 1 to 30).

Also, Zipstream dynamically adjusts compression by region and I frame interval whereas I have not heard IndigoVision claim that.

Thank you John. This is new for me with dynamic compression in this manner. Normally our clients wants a constant 25fps recording as it's ofthe process related rather than security.

Can the Axix Zipstream compressed files encoded with all bells and whistles still be played back in any viewer?

Can the Axix Zipstream compressed files encoded with all bells and whistles still be played back in any viewer?

We have tested with 3 or 4 VMSes and it has worked. It does not seem to be a general issue and should not be, but obviously i cannot vouch for 'any viewer'.

From the updated whitepaper:

When using dynamic GOP, the GOP length will vary, which might pose a problem for some VMS and other types of client software. When using dynamic FPS, the frame rate will also vary, a ecting some VMS and client software.

Hi John, Version 2.0 of ACF of IV can be configured not only with 1 ~ 30 fps only pending intelligence application to the I frame interval and dynamic regions of activity.

DFPS is soundingly awfully like what Dedicated Micros used to call Multimode:

MultiMode Recording - Dynamically-switchable resolution, record-rate & compression (MPEG-4/H.264/JPEG) settings

Maybe Mike is going to return as a patent troll ?

A feature like this is quite suitable for in cam edge recording where there is little live monitoring and only event based after the fact viewing. Limited storage, limited life of storage, but still having a 24/7 chain of evidence and not requiring a centralised NVR.

This is a huge improvement. Now we need someway to predict the benefits when sizing storage. Most NVR storage calculators are way behind the camera / codec technology. This puts more emphasis on our "guess-timating" and accepting the risk if we undersize the storage. Any ideas or help?

Brad, good question / point.

On the plus side, you are probably not going to undersize storage with any NVR storage calculator, since they almost all way overestimate even without factoring in smart codecs, which would reduce bandwidth further.

I asked Axis if their Design tool / bandwidth calculator will be updated to factor in Zipstream. I'll respond with any new info.

In general, though, I agree with your underlying point. It's becoming harder and harder to abstractly estimate bandwidth usage given the numerous factors that can radically change bandwidth consumption.

Another possibly less risky and more beneficial approach to Axis version of dynamic frame rate would be to implement VMS based frame rate paring.

The way this would work would be that the camera would transmit at full rate always, along with its motion meta-data. The VMS would record at full rate.

After a suitable period of time has elapsed, (normally corresponding to the first order review time, 48 hours for instance), those streams with little motion would be retroactively reduced based on a similar algorithm to the one used by Axis.

This has the advantage of providing the full frame rate video during the time period when it's most likely to be needed. The overall storage reduction is nearly the same, adding only the extra storage for those 48 hours. Also an automatic mechanism could be added to prevent such reduction if the footage has ever been reviewed in that period.

Server side proceessing of the reduction could take place in the background, during the low utilization periods corresponding with high dynamic GOP.

One caveat, for this to work on h.264 efficiently and without decoding, svc-t encoding or its equivalent would have to be implemented at the camera. Hikvision and Dahua have this option on some lines today.

Milestone's archive grooming method allows you to reduce framerate in multiple steps by stripping video down to keyframes. I don't want to insult their features, but it is very limited, though it certainly helps in larger deployments with long total retention times. It can end up losing valuable video or stopping recording in general if you do not constantly watch for the dynamically changing bandwidth loads. Overall you are unable to use a lot of your storage because of the possibility of data loss.

Your idea would be more effective than the in-camera codecs from usage of pre and post recording so as not to miss important details of an incident whereas relying on the camera to do this would incur extra complexity regarding offloading buffered video to be stored by the VMS after the pre and post buffers were fulfilled.

Could look at making a VMS plug-in that enhances the existing troublesome features and allow users to manage storage far better. Eventually this will likely get moved from the camera to the VMS anyway, as other centralized technologies have.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

October 2018 Camera Course on Sep 13, 2018
Today is the last day to save $50 on the October 2018 Camera Course, register now. This is the only independent surveillance camera course,...
Dell Launches IoT for Surveillance on Sep 05, 2018
Historically, Dell has been a PC and server provider (e.g., "Dude, you're getting a Dell") and widely used for surveillance storage. However, in...
Synology Surveillance Station VMS Tested on Aug 22, 2018
With so many low-cost NVRs and enterprise VMSes, is there any place in the market for NAS-based VMSes? Recently, IPVM bought a Synology NAS for...
SNMP / Network Monitoring For Surveillance 2018 on Aug 21, 2018
Surveillance systems typically rely on the the VMS to report issues, but this most often just means knowing a camera is "down" with no warning or...
2Gig Gun Lock / Motion Detector Tested on Aug 17, 2018
Safer guns for families and an opportunity for security dealers to sell more services? That is the aim of Nortek's 2GIG 'Gun Motion Detector'...
Cut Milestone Licensing Costs 80% By Using Hikvision and Dahua NVRs (Tested) on Aug 13, 2018
Enterprise VMS licensing can be quite expensive, with $200 or more per channel common, meaning a 100 camera system can cost $20,000 in VMS...
Milestone / Canon Spinout Arcules Cloud Launch on Jul 30, 2018
Canon and Milestone's VSaaS Startup spinoff Arcules launched their platform at Google Cloud Next. IPVM spoke with CEO Andreas Pettersson about the...
Eagle Eye Networks Cloud VMS Tested on Jul 26, 2018
Eagle Eye has become one of the most significant players in the industry in the past few years: Eagle Eye's Owner Acquired Brivo Eagle Eye...
Directory of Video Surveillance Startups on Jul 18, 2018
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known entity...
Axis ~$100 Camera Tested on Jul 17, 2018
Axis has released their lowest cost camera ever, the Companion Eye Mini L, setting their sights on a market dominated by Hikvision and Dahua. Can...

Most Recent Industry Reports

BluePoint Aims To Bring Life-Safety Mind-Set To Police Pull Stations on Sep 20, 2018
Fire alarm pull stations are commonplace but police ones are not. A self-funded startup, BluePoint Alert Solutions is aiming to make police pull...
SIA Plays Dumb On OEMs And Hikua Ban on Sep 20, 2018
OEMs widely pretend to be 'manufacturers', deceiving their customers and putting them at risk for cybersecurity attacks and, soon, violation of US...
Axis Vs. Hikvision IR PTZ Shootout on Sep 20, 2018
Hikvision has their high-end dual-sensor DarkfighterX. Axis has their high-end concealed IR Q6125-LE. Which is better? We bought both and tested...
Avigilon Announces AI-Powered H5 Camera Development on Sep 19, 2018
Avigilon will be showcasing "next-generation AI" at next week's ASIS GSX. In an atypical move, the company is not actually releasing these...
Favorite Request-to-Exit (RTE) Manufacturers 2018 on Sep 19, 2018
Request To Exit devices like motion sensors and lock releasing push-buttons are a part of almost every access install, but who makes the equipment...
25% China Tariffs Finalized For 2019, 10% Start Now, Includes Select Video Surveillance on Sep 18, 2018
A surprise move: In July, when the most recent tariff round was first announced, the tariffs were only scheduled for 10%. However, now, the US...
Central Stations Face Off Against NFPA On Fire Monitoring on Sep 18, 2018
Central stations are facing off against the NFPA over what they call anti-competitive language in NFPA 72, the standard that covers fire alarms....
Hikvision USA Starts Layoffs on Sep 18, 2018
Hikvision USA has started layoffs, just weeks after the US government ban was passed into law. Inside this note, we examine: The important...
Chinese Government Praises Hikvision For Following Xi Jinping on Sep 17, 2018
The Chinese government council responsible for managing China's state-owned companies praised Hikvision’s obedience to China’s authoritarian leader...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact