Panasonic Smart Coding Tested

By Ethan Ace, Published Apr 11, 2016, 12:57pm EDT

Panasonic is the latest entrant in the smart CODEC trend, introducing their own version, called 'Smart Coding' as a firmware update to nearly their entire existing line, with claims of up to 70% bandwidth savings "without sacrificing video quality."

We tested this new firmware against smart CODECs from Axis and Hikvision to see how it performs and whether it lives up to these bold claims.

Smart ****** ********

********* ************* ******* **** **** two ************ ** ***** Coding:

  • ******* ***  
  • ******** ******* ***** ********* algorithms (***** **** ***** to ** "** *****-******* Noise *********" *** "********* Divided ******"). ***, *** cannot ** ********, ** can **** ** ****** down ** ***.

**** ** ** ******** to **** *************, ***** typically ******* ******* *** in *********** **** ******* compression (******** *********** ** moving *******/********** ** ****** areas ** *** *****). 

********* ****** **** ***** new *** ************ *** part ** ***** ****** and *** ********** *** the ******** "***" ******** in *** ******'* *** interface. *******, ** ** discuss *****, ***** ******* and ****** *** ******* regardless ** ******* ***** Coding ** ******* ** disabled.

Test *******

*** **** ******* ****:

  • *** ******** ******** ********* reduction ******* ** *** light, ********** **** *** set ** **** (********* savings ** **% ** top ** *** ********* savings **** ******* * frame ********) **** ********.
  • **** *** **** *** smart ****** *******, ********* delivered *** ****** *** rate ** ***, ******* Axis *** *********, *** it **** **** ********** blur ** ****** **********. By ********, **** *** low, ********* *** ********** similar ******* *** *.
  • ** *******, ********* ***** coding ******* ~**% ********* savings ******** ** ******** Panasonic ****** *** ********* lower ********* **** ********* but ****** **** ****. However, *** * **** very ******** ** *********** non-smart ******.

 

**** **** *********** ****** blur *** ****** ****** are ******* ***** ******* settings (*** ** "****") regardless ** ******* ***** Coding ** ****** ** or ***. *******, ***** effects ** *** ************* impact *********** *******. ****** *** blur may ** ******* ** setting *** ** "***."

Camera ************* 

***** ****** ** ********* beginning ** ******** ******* 2.02 *** ** ********** with *** ******** *, 5, *** * ****** models. ********* ***** ** they **** ** *** 7 ****** (**) ************* in ****** ********.

Motion **** ******

********* ** *********, **-*** and *** *** ****** to ***** ******, **** active **** ** ** turned **. *******, ** saw ** **** ***** reduction ************, *** *** same ****** **** *** trailing ******, ********** ** whether ***** ****** *** on ** ***. *** example, ********* ***** ** our ******* ** ** moves ******* *** ***** with ***** ****** ** as **** ** ***, there ** ******, ** any, ********** ** ***** quality.

** ** ******* ** these ******* ** ******, the **** ***** *** taken **** ***** ****** on *** *** *** to ****. ******** *** long ****** ****** *** present **/****** *** *******, reducing ******* **********. 

******** *** ** "***", the ****** *** **** improve *************, *** *** still **********. *******, ******* ********* are ******* ** ***** above, **** *** ******* recognizable ** ** ***** the ****** *** ** excess ******** ** *** face.


DNR / ***** **** ********* **********

**** *** *** ******* I frame ********* **** ******* substantial ********** ** ********* consumption. ************, **** ******* bandwidth ** **% ** more (**** *** ***** even **** ***********). ******** they ******* ********* ** 90% ** **** ******** to ******** ********* *** light ***********, ** ***** in *** ***** *****:

 

Daytime ********* *********** **********

*******, ****** *** ***, with ***** ****** **, the **** ******** ********* to *** ********* ****, though **** *** **** than ****** *** ******* of *** **** *****-***. Note **** ******** ** this ***** *** ****** than ***** *** ** patterned ******** ** *** test ***** ***** **** not ******* ** *** light **** ** ** (carpet, *****, ***.).

Night ********* *********** **********

********* ********* *********** **** Smart ****** ** *** DNR *** ** ****, the ********* ****'* ******* is **** **** **** that ** *** **** P3225-LVE *** *** **** than *** ********* ****.

********* ********* ******** ** the ********* **** **** DNR *** ** *** as ********* *****, *** bandwidth ***** ** ***** than *** ********* ****, but ******** ****** **** the **** *****, **** 1080p ** *****. 

Outdoor **** ****** ********* *********** **********

*******, ********* *** ******* in * **** ******* road *****, ******* ******** drop ** ****** **% in *** ********* **-*******, as **** ** **** and ********* *******.

**** **** ***** *** *******************. ******** ******** ** the ***** ********** ******** in ****** ***** ****** eliminated ***** ******' *******, with ********* ******** ** low ****** ***** ******** had ******.

*************

***** *** *** ******** for ***** ****** ******, simply ** **/*** *******, similar ***********'* *.***+. ******* ***** ********* is ********** *********, ** the ***** ******* ******** menu, **** * ****** high/low *******, *** ** "off." ** ****** ***** settings ** **** *****:

Cameras ****

*** ********* ******** ******** were **** ** **** test:

  • ********* **-*******: *.**
  • ********* **-*******: *.**
  • **** *****-***: *.**.*.*
  • ********* **-**********-***: *.*.*

Comments (0)

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 7,324 reports and 971 tests and is only available to subscribers. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a subscriber? Login here | Join now
Loading Related Reports