Hikvision H.264+ Tested

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Feb 10, 2016

Is 'regular' H.264 soon to be a thing of the past?

Last year, Axis started the 'smart' H.264 trend with their Zipstream release. Later last year, Hikvision announced their own offering, named H.264+.

IPVM finds 'smart codecs' to be one of the most intriguing new developments in the market today.

How well does Hikvision's H.264+ work? IPVM upgraded 3 Hikvision cameras (the DS-2CD4024FWD-A, DS-2CD4132FWD-IZ and the DS-2CD6026FHWD-A) to H.264+. We then tested them against 2 Axis Zipstream cameras (the M1125 and the Q1635).

We did tests:

  • Indoor day
  • Indoor dark
  • Outdoor treeline
  • Outdoor roadway

We then compared bandwidth, image quality of those 5 cameras as well as the H.265 cameras we tested recently to determine what impact Hikvision's H.264+ would have.

** '*******' *.*** **** ** ** * ***** ** *** past?

**** ****, **** ******* *** '*****' *.*** ***** **** ************** *******. ***** **** ****, ********* ********* ***** *** ********, ***** H.264+.

**** ***** '***** ******' ** ** *** ** *** **** ********** *** ************ in *** ****** *****.

*** **** **** *********'* *.***+ ****? **** ******** * ********* cameras (*** **-**********-*, **-**********-** *** *** **-***********-*) ** *.***+. ** then ****** **** ******* * **** ********* ******* (*********** ********).

** *** *****:

  • ****** ***
  • ****** ****
  • ******* ********
  • ******* *******

** **** ******** *********, ***** ******* ** ***** * ******* as **** ** ****.*** ********* ****** ******** ** ********* **** ****** *********'* *.***+ ***** have.

[***************]

*******

** *** *****, ********* *.***+ ************* ******* ********* ** *** scenes (**-**% ********** **** ******), **** *** ****** ****** ** high ****** ******** ****** ** ****, **** ******* ******* ******, in **** ****** ******** **** *********'* *** ********.

********, **** *.***+ *** ********* ** *** ******** ** *** Hikvision ****, ********* *** *** **** ******, ****** **** ***** the ***** ********* **** ********* ******, ********* ****** ***** ********** to **** *** *** *** ** *** ******.

*.***+ ** ****** ** **** * **** ******** ****** ** Hikvision's *********** ********, ******* ** *** **** ** ***** *** competitors ** ******* **** ***** *** ***** ***** *********. **** Axis *** ********* **** ******** ********** ********* *******, ** ******* all ************* **** ** ********** ********* ***** *** ***** ***** cameras.

H.265 ******

**** *********'* *.***+ *** **** ********* ********* *** **** ********* savings **** *.***, ** ***** ** *** *.*** ** *.*** shootout. ** ****, ** *** ************ ********* ***** *** ***** term ****** ** *.*** ***** *** ********* ******* ** '*****' H.264 ******** **** *** ******* ** **** **** ******** *****.

Camera *************

*.***+ ** ********* ** ****** ********* ******* ******** ** ******** 5.3.4, ********* ************* *******. **** **** ********* ******* ********** ******* ********* ******** ********, with ***** ******* ******* *.*.* ** ******, ***** ****** *** Asia ***** *.*.* *** *.*.* *** ********. **** ******, ***** should ******* ***** ******* ** **** *** ****** ******* *** their ******.

*** ******* * *** * ****** ********* ******* ******* *.***+. It ** ********* ** *** * ****** *** **** *******, which ******** *** *** ****** *** ************** ** ** ****. ***** * ****** ****** ** *** support **.

**** ***** **** ********* ******* ***** ** *.***+ *** ******** in **** *** ****, ~$*** *** *** ******. ******** ** Axis *********, ***** ** ********* ** ****** **** *** ******, with *** ********* ** *** *** ***** ********* ******(~$***-***), ***** ****** *** ************* **** *********.

Limited *************

*********'* *.***+ ******** *** ************* ********, **** *********** **** * simple **/*** ******* *** ********* *********. ** ******* ** ******* I-frame ******** ** *********** *** ********, ****** **** ********* ***** includes ******** ******** *** **** ** *****.

*** **** ************ ********* ********** **** ***** *.***+ ** "******* average *******", ***** ******** ** **** ******* ***** * *** level **** ** ******** ****** ** ****. *********'* ************* ****** at ***** ***** **** *** ******** *** *** ****** ** properly ****** ** **** *******.

** ****** ***** ******* ************* ******* ** **** *****:

Stream ********

** *** ***** ***** ** ****** ****** ******** ** *.***+ and **** ********* ***** ***** ******* ********* ********.

*******, ******* ************ ***** *.***+ ** ********* ****** *** ~** at ** ***. **** ******** ***** ***. *******, ********* ****** Q ****** **** **** ******, **** ~** ** **, ***** Axis ****** **** ~**-**.

**** **** *** ********* ******** *-***** ********* ** ***** ** seconds *** ** *** ***** ** ********.

Bitrate ***********

** ******** ******** ** *** ******* **** ***** ****** ** and *** ** ******** ******:

****** ******

*****, *******, ***** ******* ** *** *********, ******* *.***+ ** reduces ******** ** *** ********* ******* ** ** ******* ** about **%. *******, **** ** ***** ******, ******* ** ***** roughly ******* ** *** **** ***** **** ************.******* ********* ** (****, *** ****), *** *****'* ******* ** about **% ***** **** *** ********* *******.

** ***** ** *** **** *****, *.***+ ******** *** ***** significantly ***** (>**%), *** **** ***** *** ********* **** *** 4024 *** ************* ****** **** *** **** *****. *******, *** to *** *****-** **, *** **** *** *** ****** ******** in **** *****, ***** **% ***** **** *** *****.

********** ********* ** ** ***, *.***+ (*** *********) ******** *********. Hikvision ******** ******* ** ** ******* ** ~**%, ** *** Zipstream ** *** *****. *** **** *** *** ****** ** the ********* ******, ******** ***** **** *** **** ******.

******* ******

****, ** ****** ********, ***** * ******** **** ****** ******* and ******* ** *** ***. ** **** *****, *.***+ ******* increased, ********* ~**%, ***** ********* ********* ******** ** ~**%.

** **** *****, *********'* **** *** **** **** **** ******** lower **** *** **** *****, ***** *** **** *** ********** higher.

*******, ** ****** ** * **** **** *** **** **** amounts ** ******. *.***+ ****** *** ********, ********* **** **** 70%. *** *****, *** **** ****** **** ********* *** ******* lower, **** **** *** **** *********** *** ******* **** *.***+ on.

Image ******* *******

*.***+ ****** ** ***** ******* *** **** ******, **** ******* in **** **** ******* ** *** *********** ** ****** ******, such ** *** ******* ** *** ********* *****. **** *.***+ off *** ******* ** **** *******, **** ********** ******** *** leaves *******. ******* *.***+ **, *** ****** ** *** ***** becomes ********** ******* *** ****, **** ******* **** ******* *** brighter **********, ** ****.

*******, **** **** ***** *********** *** *****, *** ** *** no ********* ****** ** *** ***** ** ****** ******* **** as ****** ** ********.

Test **********

*** ******* **** ****** ***** ******* ******** ****** ***** ********, configured ** ***** *****.

******** ******** **** *** **** ****:

  • **** *****: *.**.*.*
  • **** *****: *.**.*.*
  • ********* **-**********-*: *.*.*
  • ********* **-**********-**: *.*.*
  • ********* **-***********-*: *.*.*

Comments (28)

I have just started upgrading some LTS HD TVI DVRs to the latest firmware with H265. Will be interesting what affect it has on storage. Will be a bit hard to judge as the number of TVI HD cameras coincidentally be increasing at the same time. Time will tell.

Lew, do you recall the model numbers? And that is for H.265 or H.264+ (or as LTS labels its H.264 Zip+)?

Was there any increased CPU usage on the client? Does choosing H.264+ have any effect on the cameras ability to deliver multiple streams or higher frame rates?

No increase in CPU.

Turning H.264+ on in the 4 and 6 series reduces multistreaming to two streams instead of three, and you can no longer get 60 FPS in cameras which support it (e.g., the 6026). But we saw no issues with 1080p30 streaming being full frame rate, nor 3MP/20 FPS in the 4132.

The model is # LTD8432T-FA and there was no detail with the firmware update but after a few emails re current listing of model having H265 I was informed the same units I have could be upgraded with the latest firmware 'TVI_V3.1.7_151216'. The specs simply say "Compression H265" The latest version of NVMS7000 (PC) apparently caters for H265 as well.

A methodology question:

In the H.265 tests, the h.265 camera were compared to mainstream h.264 cameras from different models and from other brands. The key conclusions of the report came from this comparison, not from the cameras own h.264 performance vs h.265 performance:

Net / net, these two H.265 cameras offered minimal to no bandwidth savings compared to modern / current H.264 cameras.

explaining

We do not emphasize [intra-camera results] because it does not really impact the general question of whether H.265 is 'better' than H.264.

Though in this tests there are no comparison to mainstream h.264. We only have comparisons among h.264+ capable cameras, switching between h.264 and h.264+ of the same camera to draw conclusions.

This would seem to set the bar higher for the h.265 cameras, then h.264+ cameras, no?

"We only have comparisons among h.264+ capable cameras, switching between h.264 and h.264+ of the same camera to draw conclusions."

The smart codec bandwidth results (Hikvision and Axis) are incredibly low compared to 'regular' H.264 cameras.

So for now it seems H265 has a competitor to "enhanced" H264 methods, but wasn't one benefit of H265 supposed to be you only needed one stream from which you could pull different resolutions, such as high-res for recording and low-res for viewing?

No. I've never heard anyone even claim that before. The 'pulling' different resolutions is a feature of scalable video codecs and H.265 being shipped / implemented is not scalable, just like 'regular' H.264 is not.

Thanks for clarifying that.

No. I've never heard anyone even claim that before. The 'pulling' different resolutions is a feature of scalable video codecs and H.265 being shipped / implemented is not scalable, just like 'regular' H.264 is not.

To be clear, a few manufacturers claim to use scalable h.264 today, as well as supporting 'regular' h.265, so there is reason to believe that they will implement it in h.265 at some point.

Also, amberella released a chip a couple years ago that had h.265 and svc on it, don't know if that ever ended up in any products.

To be clear, no one has claimed to implement scalable H.265 for IP cameras or recorders. And, in terms of models shipping, about 0.1% or less claim to be supporting scalable H.264.

Scalable video codecs have theoretical benefits, they just have never gained enough practical implementation to be a factor.

...about 0.1% or less claim to be supporting scalable h.264

Doesn't at least one of the Hikvision cameras from the test have H.264/SVC?

I think the Smart Series has has had it for a while now.

To be clear, no one has claimed to implement scalable H.265 for IP cameras or recorders.

Made right here in the good ol' USA!

Aventura claims a lot of things for a long time but there is no evidence any of it is for real. +1 for you on the technicality but this does not change the fundamental market situation.

Looks like the firmware I installed does not have H265. Not this update but the next hopefully. A typo on the website I think.

Lew, thanks for the feedback. I am curious what the upgrade delivers. I have not heard of any existing NVR appliances being field upgradeable to H.265. I am sure it's possible but generally the increased processing needed to do so makes it impractical for existing units.

I recently installed 4 of the new 4MP value plus cameras and enabled h.264+. I installed them on a Milestone system and noticed a significant delay in the video streams "starting" in the viewing client versus turning h.264+ off. Anyone else try this out in Milestone and experience anything similar? Running the 2016 Smart client on a Core i5 with HW Acceleration enabled. I ended up disabling h264+ for the time being due to the delay being pretty bad at times up to 30 seconds or so when double clicking on a camera to enlarge then going back to a multi-view. CPU wasn't high just a long delay...

Hi Michael, I didn't see that in my tests, but we haven't updated to 2016 yet, and didn't have the firmware update for the 2 series when we began testing. I'll update both and report back.

Michael,

"Running the 2016 Smart client on a Core i5 with HW Acceleration enabled."

Can you try to see what the difference is between HW acceleration enabled vs disabled? We are discussing this with Milestone and that was one element they suggested we consider.

Finally got around to testing this. The delay is still present with HW acceleration on and off. I've got these h264 plus cams on a few different systems and all of them still have the same results. They are also noticeably slower to appear in milestone mobile.

The cause of this is probably that the client will have to wait for an I-frame before it can start decoding the rest of the frames. Smart codecs do have higher GOPs when there is no motion on the camera, which means a potentially long wait for the first I-frame. If you generate a lot of motion e.g. aggressively wave your hand in front of the camera, is the delay nearly as long?

Thanks for the test and report. H.264+ turns out to be useful and probably more and more low cost H.264+ cameras will come out soon.

It's very funny to compare h.264+ with h.265, since the same technology that h.264+ used can be used for h.265 as well.

Agreed, it can be, and some manufacturers are already using smart CODECs with H.265 (such as Vivotek, see our H.265 IP Cameras Test).

The point in comparing it here is that H.264+ clearly has significant benefits over H.265, without the additional complications of H.265, like limited VMS support, increased processor usage, etc.

When H.265 is mainstream and smart CODECs are using it, yes, things may be lower still, but I personally don't see that widespread acceptance happening in 2016.

...but I personally don't see that widespread acceptance happening in 2016.

If by widespread acceptence you mean the Western VMS manufacturers will have comprehensive connectivity to h.265 cameras, I agree with you, it ain't going to happen this year.

On the other hand, if widespread acceptence is measured by the number of cameras and matched NVRs that will be actually using the technology, I think it will be substantial.

Why? Looking at the new models coming out of both Chinese republics, they seem to be mostly h.265. At this point, it probably doesn't cost them much more to use that chip, so I would expect by year's end that pretty much EVERY device they make to be h.265 capable.

Costco's already selling h.265 NVR's!

When this next wave of h.265 cameras hits big box, usage will depend not on people's acceptence of h.265, but only on the way the NVR and cameras communicate by default.

This, of course, wasn't the way it was planned. H.265 should have been an elite feature on high-end, high-processing cameras connected to high-performance workstations. But??

But regardless of why that didn't happen and regardless of how good it is or not, by the end of the year, I would expect the low-end IP market to be primarily h.265 capable.

IMVHO.

"Looking at the new models coming out of both Chinese republics, they seem to be mostly h.265."

More specifics please. The pattern that I see is that H.265 is or was a hot spec item inside of China but that the export / overseas market is still firmly H.264.

The fact that H.265 is more advanced does not mean it has to be successful in business. The same fact happened to MPEG-2, which had been used in the broadcasting industry for super long time, even if MPEG-4 was proved to be much more efficient in coding than MPEG-2.

If no big players like Google/Apple/Microsoft are embracing H.264/HEVC, and making it to be a successful market standard, then I don't see HEVC will soon be widely accepted, and the licensing issue of HEVC may not be quickly solved either.

The history why H.264 license was made to very low or free, was because Microsoft invented VC-1 to be competitor and made H.264 to be at a difficult position. After H.264 becomes cheap or free, it was soon supported by all popular operating systems, Windows, MacOS/iOS and Android.

Because H.265 has no competitor right now, it's hard to see H.265 license issue to be solved soon. so H.265 may be only limited, and use in some 4K or above 4K video only. also H.265 in surveillance market may take a few years to grow to bigger size, that's why H.264+ can be more useful than we thought.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
WDR Tutorial on Jan 11, 2019
Understanding wide dynamic range (WDR) is critical to capturing high quality images in demanding conditions. However, with no real standards, any...
Winter 2019 IP Networking Course on Jan 10, 2019
Today is the last day to register for the Winter 2019 IP Networking course. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video...
Worst Products Tested In Past Year on Jan 09, 2019
IPVM has done over 100 tests in the past year. But which products performed the worst? Which ones should users be most aware of? In this report,...
Managed Video Services UL 827B Examined on Jan 09, 2019
Historically, UL listings for central stations have been important, with UL 827 having widespread support. However, few central stations have...
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial on Jan 08, 2019
H.265 support improved significantly in 2018, with H.265 camera/VMS compatibility increased compared to only a year ago, and most manufacturers...
2019 Video Surveillance Cameras Overview on Jan 07, 2019
Each year, IPVM summarizes the main advances and changes for video surveillance cameras, based on our industry-leading testing and...
Surveillance Codec Guide on Jan 03, 2019
Codecs are core to surveillance, with names like H.264, H.265, and MJPEG commonly cited. How do they work? Why should you use them? What issues may...
Camera Course January 2019 on Jan 03, 2019
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training exists...
The Battle For The VSaaS Market Begins 2019 - Alarm.com, Arcules, Eagle Eye, OpenEye, Qumulex, Verkada, More on Jan 02, 2019
2019 will be the year that VSaaS finally becomes a real factor for professional video surveillance. While Video Surveillance as a Service (VSaaS)...

Most Recent Industry Reports

2019 Camera Book Released on Jan 22, 2019
This is the best, most comprehensive security camera training in the world, based on our unprecedented testing. Now, all IPVM PRO Members can get...
Milesight Company Profile on Jan 22, 2019
Milesight Technology, a Chinese company building an International branded business, says they are slowly building their presence through a series...
Intersec 2019 Live From Dubai Day 2 on Jan 22, 2019
There’s a massive presence from Chinese or China-focused video surveillance firms, chiefly Hikvision, Dahua, Huawei, and Infinova, at...
Cable Trenching for Surveillance on Jan 21, 2019
Trenching cable for surveillance is surprisingly complex. While using shovels, picks, and hoes is not advanced technology, the proper planning,...
Milestone Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 21, 2019
Milestone's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2016. While the industry has been...
The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have become core features of video surveillance systems, as virtually all professional IP cameras integrate with...
NYPD Refutes False SCMP Hikvision Story on Jan 18, 2019
The NYPD has refuted the SCMP Hikvision story, the Voice of America has reported. On January 11, 2018, the SCMP alleged that the NYPD was using...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact