Smart Codec Guide

By: IPVM Team, Published on Feb 01, 2018

"Smart Codec" was once seemingly a marketing buzzword, but in 2020, nearly all new camera models include this tehcnology.

These marketing names vary, including 'Zipstream', 'Smart Coding', 'H.264+', 'Smart Stream II', and others, and critically, these implementations and bandwidth savings vary dramatically.

In this Guide, we explain what smart codecs attempt to do and the most common implementations, covering:

  • Historic static compression, I-frame interval, and FPS techniques
  • Smart codec basic
  • Dynamic compression
  • Dynamic I-frame interval/GOP
  • Dynamic FPS
  • Static compression regions
  • Intelligent DNR
  • VMS/NVR compatibility
  • Manufacturer support
  • IPVM test recommendations
  • Bandwidth risks
  • Smart codec outlook

To understand this, you must have a good understanding of codecs, compression and bandwidth variations. Please first review our:

'Normal' codecs, like 'regular' H.264, set one compression level, one I frame interval, and one frame rate. 'Smart' codecs change one, two, or all of those, reviewed inside.

"***** *****" *** **** seemingly * ********* ********, but ** ****, ****** all *** ****** ****** include **** **********.

***** ********* ***** ****, including '*********', '***** ******', 'H.264+', '***** ****** **', and ******, *** **********, these *************** *** ********* savings **** ************.

** **** *****, ** explain **** ***** ****** attempt ** ** *** the **** ****** ***************, covering:

  • ******** ****** ***********, *-***** interval, *** *** **********
  • ***** ***** *****
  • ******* ***********
  • ******* *-***** ********/***
  • ******* ***
  • ****** *********** *******
  • *********** ***
  • ***/*** *************
  • ************ *******
  • **** **** ***************
  • ********* *****
  • ***** ***** *******

** ********** ****, *** must **** * **** understanding ** ******, *********** and ********* **********. ****** first ****** ***:

'******' ******, **** '*******' H.264, *** *** *********** level, *** * ***** interval, *** *** ***** rate. '*****' ****** ****** one, ***, ** *** of *****, ******** ******.

[***************]

"Normal" ***** ******

** ****** ******, ***** key ********** *** ********* set ** ***** ******:

  • *********** ***** (********* ****** quality ** ************)
  • * ***** ******** (********* called *** ** ***)
  • ***** **** (***)

**** ** *** *** not ***** ** *****, they ***** **** ************* making ***** *** ********* on *** ******** (*.*., see** ****** ************ *********** Comparison).

Fixed *********** *******

'******' ****** *** * single *********** ***** *** the ****** *****, ********** of **** ** ***** displayed. *** *******, ** we **** ** * scene ** * *******, both *** ****** ******* as **** ** *** static *****, *****, ****, and ***** ********** ***** will ** ********** ** the **** ***** ** each *****:

Fixed *-***** ******** *******

*** **** *********** ********** between *****'* ****** (*.***/*.***) and ******* ****** **** MJPEG ** **** **** do *** **** *** 'same' ***** **** *** over *****. *******, * single **** ***** ** sent (****** ** '*-*****'), followed ** **** ***** updates ** *** ***** of *** ***** ***** have *******, ****** '*-******.' In ******** ******, *** I-frame ******** ** *****. This ***** **** *** camera **** ****** ******** an * ***** ************, most ******** * ******. In **** ********, ** the ****** ** ** FPS, ** **** **** 1 *-***** ******** ** 29 *-****** *** **** repeat.

*** ******** ** * fixed *-***** ******** ** that *** ******** ** the ***** *** ****. Sometimes * ******* *** be ***** *** ** hour. ****** *** '*****' time, ******* ** * frame **** *** ****** is ********. ******** **** I ****** ******* *** more ********* **** * frames, ***** ** *** order ** *** ****.

*** **** *** ***** of ****** **** *******, I ***** ******** ****** be ********* ** ****** artifacts *** ***** ****** (see****: *.*** * ** P ***** ******).

Smart ***** **********:

****** ******* ******, ***** codecs *********** ****** ***** parameters, ***** * *********** of ***** **********:

  • ******* ***********:******* *********** ** ******* areas ** *** ***** instead ** *** ****** frame.
  • ******* *-***** ********:******* *-***** ******** ********* on ****** ** *** scene.
  • ******* *********:******* *** ********* ** motion ** *** *****.

** **** ** ***** in **** ****** *****.

Dynamic ***********

*** ***** ********* **** is ******* ***********, ***** adjusts ************ ***** *** different ***** ** *** scene ***** ** ********. For *******, ******* ** setting *********** ** '******' for *** ***** *****, as ***** ** *** hallway ***** *****, *** camera ******* *********** ** the ****** ******* ** low (****** *******), ** maximize ******* *******, *** increases *********** ** ****** background *****.

** ********* *********** ****** for ***** ** *** scene, ** ** ******** to **** ****** ******* bandwidth ******** *** ********* quality ** ***** ***** matter ** **** ************* assigning *********** ****** ** relevant ***** ** *** scene.

Dynamic *-***** ********

******, ***** ****** *** adjust *-***** ******** ***** on ******** ** ******** in * *****. ** long ** *** ***** has ****** ** ******, the ****** *** **** an *-***** ************ (*.*., every * ** ** or ** *******), *** as **** ** *********** activity ** ********, ** I-frame ** *********, **** the ******** **** ***** as **** ** ******** continues.

*** ***** ***** ***** analysis ** * ******** H.264 ****** ****** *** using ******* *-***** ******** (GOP). ***** *** ******** codec ******* ***** ** an ******** ** **, the ******* *** ******, increasing ** **** ** when ***** ** ** motion ** *** *****. Note **** **** ******* shown ***** **** ** FPS.

***** ******* *-***** ******** will *** ******* *******, quality ****** ****** *********** the ****, ***** ************* reducing *********. ** *** tests, ******* *** ** the ******* ****** ** bandwidth ******* ** ***** codecs.

Dynamic ***

****** **** *****/**** **** included ******* ***, ****** '****** ***** *********' *** ******* *****, its ************ ** ** cameras ** **** ******. Like *-***** ********, ******* FPS ******* ******* ** simply ******* ***** ****** when ***** ** ** activity ** *** *****.

***** **** *** *********** reduce ******* (********* ***** 10 **/* *** ******** in *** *****), ***** should ****** ** ******** frame **** ** **** moving ******* *** ** missed ** **** *****, such ** ******** ** highway *****, ******* ******** in ***** *****, ***. Additionally, ** **** ***** regulations *** ******** **** frame **** *********.

Not-So-Smart: ****** *********** *******

**** ******* ***** ***** to *** ***** ***** as ********** *** **********. This *** ****** ******* in **** ***** *** introduces ********** ***** ******** to ***** ******:

  • ************* **** ***********:** ******* *** *** carefully *** ***** ** actual *** ** *** area ***** ********, ****** objects *** **** **** higher *********** "**********" *****, potentially ****** ****** *******.
  • ******** ******** ** ********** change:** *** ***** *******, users **** ******** ****** their ****** ******* ** properly ******* *** ** the *****. ** ********** is ******** **** ***** smart ******.

Related ***** **********: ***** *********

****** ****** **** ******* with ******* *****, ****** in *** ***** ******. This ***** '*****' ****** the ****** *** ********* tricks ******** **** ******** it ** **** ********. Because *** ****** ******** it ** ********, ** takes **** ********* (***** a *** **** *********). See**** / *** *** Video ************ *****

************ ******* *** ****** intelligence ** *********** ******* real ******** (* ****** walking, * *** *******, etc.) *** ******* ***** which *** ****** ********* significantly. *** ****, *** our****** *** (******* ***** Reduction) *****.

Works **** ******** *****/****

******* ***** ****** **** within *** ******** ********* of *.***/*.***, ********** ******* is ********* *** ******** by ***** *** ****, in ******** ** **** specialized ****** ***** ***** to ****** ********* (**** as******* ************** ********' *******) *** ******* ****** integration.

**** ***** *** ********** issues **** ***** ******** or ******* *** *******, but **** *** ********** have ******** ******* ***** smart ******' ************ *** removed ***** ******.

Manufacturer ****** *******

******* *********, **** ******* a ****** ****** *** dynamic *********** ******, **** not **** ** ******* that ** ****** *** smart *-***** ********* ** dynamic ***. **** ******* only ******* *** ** the ***** (**** ******** dynamic ***********), ***** ****** support *** *****.

*** ***** ***** ******* which ************* ******* ***** smart ***** ********:

Manufacturer *********** ******

**** *** ****** * number ** ***** *************** including:

**** *****, ** **** found * *** *** points:

  • ***** * ***** ******** had *** ******* ******, with **%+ ******* ******, simply ******* **** ************ scenes *** ****** *** long **** *******, ******** great ******* **** **** I ******.
  • ******* ***** *********** *** the **** ******* ******, though ** **** ***** bandwidth *******.
  • ***** ***** *********** *** the ***** ******, ***** at **** **-**% *******, because ** ****** ** what ***** ** ******.

Bandwidth ***** ** **** ****** ******

****** ***** ****** *** greatly ****** ********** *******, ***** ****** ****** **** calculating ********* ***** ** high ****** ****** *** see ****** ** ** savings **** ***** ******** codecs. *** *******, ** a **** ****** ******* scene, ******** ** ****, Panasonic, *** ********* ******* were **** ***** **** with ***** ****** ******** during ******* ** **** motion, *.*., ***** *******:

*******, ** *******, ********** for **** ***** ******* and **** ******* ******* across ******* *******, ******* were ***** ** **% on *** *******.

******* ***** ****** *** have ****** ****** ** high ****** *******, ********* needs **** ** ********** for ***** **** ********,*** *******, ******** ***** ***** savings. ******* ** ** so ***** ************ *** drop ******** ** ***** links ** ******** *******.

Smart ***** *******

** ****, ****** *** major ************* ******* ***** codecs ** ** ***** some ** ***** *******, with **** ************ **** in *** ******** ** their ****. ***** ******* them, ** ***** ***** techniques ** ****** ********* (such ** ********* *** or ******** ***** *****) will ** ** * significant ************ ****** *******.

******* ** **** **** availability, ********** ***** *** surged. ** *** *******, integrators ********* **** **%+ of *** ******* *** smart ******:

*** *** *********** ***** ***** ********** 2019*** *******.

Comments (19)

What’s the impact of new smart CODECs on existing surveillance systems? Is the enhanced compression transparent to existing VMSs?

We have not seen any issues integrating with VMSes to date. The changes are primarily on the encoding / camera side with decoding remaining the same for the VMS.

Panasonic is now announcing 'smart coding technology'. Here is how they describe it:

"Smart Coding Technology that modifies the encoding compression algorithm in standard H.264 video streams, yielding up to 70 percent improvement in bandwidth reduction to reduce bandwidth has been released.
Available as a free firmware upgrade to all new Panasonic 3, 5 and 6 Series Models, the technology offers significant decreased overall bandwidth usage to effectively lessen the amount of storage needed for recorded images.
Smart Coding technology encoding deploys Group of Picture (GOP) Control; Frequency Divided Filter (FDF); and 3-D Multi-Process Noise Reduction (3D-MNR) to achieve a lower bit rate for recorded images without degrading the captured and transmitted video stream. Combined, these features can effectively provide a substantial bit rate reduction (the number of bits per second that can be transmitted along a digital network) in the recorded video."

We expect to see more and more manufacturers to do similar as the bandwidth benefits are obvious and significant.

Undiclosed Manufactuter brings up an interesting point here about switching between streams with a high GOP ratio:

To decode the current frame, the Client UI would have to decode the previous I-frame and all the subsequent p/b frames, and if the gap between I-frames is 5 to 8 seconds, this could be between 50 to 200 frames depending on the frame rate. I doubt the VMS would send these previous frames to reduce the delay, and will just expect the client to wait. Keep in mind that traditionally, I-frames are every second or two so the wait is not normally that long. Again, smart codecs can cause the delay to be much longer in some cases - it is the price you pay for increased storage...

When using a VMS to switch between streams have you noticed any unusually long delays? If UM is right, one might be waiting 20 seconds before seeing a live picture, which might be considered unacceptable by many.

Some Cameras & VMS allow for I-Frame insertion request to be sent to demand an I-Frame immediately. This can mitigate waiting 200+ frames for the next regularly scheduled I-Frame.

Is this an out-of-band request that operates on an existing RTSP stream, or is this made when creating a new socket?

We had a site where we installed a brand new Q6000 + Q60 PTZ and decided to try Dynamic GOP on the VMS. We leaned the hard way that VMD does not work when your I-frame interval is too high, we had an incident and no video because there where not enough frames to compare for VMD to kick off recording.

 

Dynamic GOP is great for continuous recording but be very careful on motion based recording.

That's a terrible side effect! What VMS were you using? Server side or camera side VMD?

its one of the Top 5 VMS's, Cam side VMD.

If its Cam side VMD then it's not the VMSes fault, right?

It's hard to say. Because the cam is doing the detection but the VMS is getting the metadata to tell it to records. It still needs to get enough frames to compare. 

 

The more it's discussed the more questions arise on the technicalities. 

I am trying bench test a similar cam but have. It had a chance to do so. 

Its hard to say. Because the cam is doing the detection but the VMS is getting the metadata to tell it to records. It still needs to get enough frames to compare.

so maybe the I-frame associated with the P-frames that have motion in them has already been discarded by the VMS when the meta-data comes in?  What was the pre-record amount set to?

Maybe you can set that to a large enough value to cover the GOP length.

We believe that is precisely what happened. GOP  length was get to ~300.

I think pre/Post was set to 15 Seconds

Good write-up.

A great write-up.

Good to know about the CODEC guide.

The Surveillance Codec Guide link mentioned above in this page doesn't work.

Sorry, but the page you were trying to view does not exist.

It looks like this was the result of either:

  • a mistyped address
  • an out-of-date link

Thanks for the heads up Juan.  The link to the Surveillance Codec Guide is now working.

I highly enjoyed the Smart Codec Guide material presented here.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,380 reports, 860 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Video Surveillance History on May 06, 2020
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to an emerging AI cloud era and now impacted by...
Video Surveillance Architecture 101 on Feb 18, 2020
Video surveillance can be designed and deployed in a number of ways. This 101 examines the most common options and architectures used in...
Bandwidth Fundamentals For Video Surveillance on Jan 13, 2020
Bandwidth is the most fundamental element of computer networking for video surveillance systems. Because video surveillance can consume an immense...
Video Surveillance Cameras 101 on Feb 25, 2020
Cameras come in many shapes, sizes and specifications. This 101 examines the basics of cameras and features used in 2020. In this report, we...
Converged vs Dedicated Networks For Surveillance Tutorial on Feb 12, 2020
Use the existing network or deploy a new one? This is a critical choice in designing video surveillance systems. Though 'convergence' was a big...
Mobotix Thermal Body Temperature Detection Examined on Apr 07, 2020
Mobotix has jumped into the Coronavirus temperature detection market, but how do they compare to thermal incumbents like FLIR or ICI who have been...
ISS Presents Face As A Credential and UVSS on Apr 30, 2020
ISS presented its security platform, including access control integration, native facial recognition, and under-vehicle scanning system (UVSS) at...
GeoVision Presents AI and Facial Recognition on May 22, 2020
GeoVision presented its AI analytics and facial recognition at the April 2020 IPVM New Products show. Inside this report: A 30-minute video...
Video Analytics 101 on Mar 16, 2020
This guide teaches the fundamentals of video surveillance analytics. Inside we cover: Why Use Video Analytics Video Analytics Warning Where...
The Battle For the VSaaS Market 2020 - Avigilon, Arcules, Eagle Eye, OpenEye, Qumulex, Tyco, Verkada on Jan 13, 2020
While VSaaS suffered from inflated expectations in the 2010s, 2020 marks a new decade and a much stronger competitive position for VSaaS vs...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Remove Dahua and Hikvision Equipment "Immediately" Or Else Banned From US Government Contracts on Jul 10, 2020
The US government has directed contractors to remove covered equipment, such as Dahua, Hikvision, and Huawei Hisilicon products, "immediately." If...
ZeroEyes Presents Firearm Detection Video Analytics on Jul 09, 2020
ZeroEyes presented its Firearm detection Video Analytics system at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. A 30-minute video from ZeroEyes...
Directory of 162 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Jul 09, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers to help you see and research what options are available. There are...
Clinton Public View Monitor (PVM) Mask Detection Tested on Jul 09, 2020
Face mask detection, or more specifically not wearing one, is expanding amidst the pandemic. Clinton Electronics has added this capability to their...
These Florida Real Estate Agents Are Now Selling "SafeCheck USA" Temperature Detectors on Jul 09, 2020
The "Kakon Brothers", William and Nathan, are self-described "south Florida Power Agents specializing in Luxury Real Estate" who "have closed over...
Avigilon ACC Cloud Tested on Jul 08, 2020
Avigilon merged Blue and ACC, adding VSaaS features to its on-premise VMS, offering remote video and health monitoring that was previously limited...
Hikvision's India Dominance Faces Threat on Jul 08, 2020
While Hikvision has become a dominant video surveillance provider in India, recent tension between the governments of India and the PRC is...
The US Fight Over Facial Recognition Explained on Jul 08, 2020
The controversy around facial recognition has grown significantly in 2020, with Congress members and activists speaking out against it while video...
Sperry West / Alibaba Tablet Temperature Measurement Tested on Jul 07, 2020
In April, we ordered a ~$500 temperature tablet from Alibaba. We set it to the side while doing 18 other temperature screening tests but, after...
Facial Recognition: Weak Sales, Anti Regulation, No Favorite, Says Security Integrators on Jul 07, 2020
While facial recognition has gained greater prominence, a new IPVM study of security systems integrators shows weak sales, opposition to...