Surveillance Codec Guide

By: IPVM Team, Published on Jan 03, 2019

Codecs are core to surveillance, with names like H.264, H.265, and MJPEG commonly cited. How do they work? Why should you use them? What issues may you face? In this tutorial, we examine this in-depth covering:

  • Uncompressed vs. Compressed Video
  • Inter vs. Intra Frame Compression
  • I vs P Frames
  • Other Frame Types
  • H.264 vs H.265 vs MJPEG
  • H.265 Emergence
  • Smart Codec Growth
  • Proprietary Codecs
  • Scalable Codecs - JPEG2000, SVC
  • Quality of Codecs
  • Codec Support in Surveillance
  • Future Codecs
  • What Codecs to Choose?

****** *** **** ** surveillance, **** ***** **** H.264, *.***, *** ***** commonly *****. *** ** they ****? *** ****** you *** ****? **** issues *** *** ****? In **** ********, ** examine **** **-***** ********:

  • ************ **. ********** *****
  • ***** **. ***** ***** Compression
  • * ** * ******
  • ***** ***** *****
  • *.*** ** *.*** ** MJPEG
  • *.*** *********
  • ***** ***** ******
  • *********** ******
  • ******** ****** - ********, SVC
  • ******* ** ******
  • ***** ******* ** ************
  • ****** ******
  • **** ****** ** ******?

[***************]

Uncompressed **. ********** *****

*********** *** ************ ***** is **********, ** ******* and ******* ******* ***** easily ** **** ******* for ************.

**** ***** ** *********, it ** ********* ************. There *** * **** factors ** *** **** of ************ *****:

  • *** ***** ** ****** supported *** **** *****
  • *** ***** ****** ** pixels *** *****
  • *** ***** ****** ** frames *** ******

** **** *** ***** size, *** ******** **** of *****. ***'* **** through **** ** *****.

***** ******

**** ***** ** ***** a ***** *********** ** a ****** ****** * range. *** ***** ********** how ********* *** ***** can ** ******* *** also ******* ******* *** bandwidth/size.

  • **** *********, ***** ********** has * ***** ** 256 ****** (* ****) with * ************ *****, 255 ************ ***** *** the ******* ** ******* representing ****** ** ****.
  • ** ******, ****** *** surveillance ***** ***** ******** color ** *** ***** of ****** ****** ** represent *** *** ****** is *** *******. ** bits ** **,*** ****** is ******.

**********/********* ******

*** ***** *** ******* are *** ****** ** understand ** **** *** the********** ** *** *** camera, *********** ********** ***** vertical ***** ******:

** **** ******** *** ******, ****** ****, *****, 30fps, ***. *** **** majority ** ************ ******* (>80% ** *** *******) are ******** ** ******* 5 *** ** *** (see******* ***** **** ***** Surveillance ****).

Adding ** **

**** ** ******** **** is *********** *** ******* uncompressed ***** *** ******. Take * ***** ***** camera ** *****. ************ it ** *** ******* of *** *********:

*********** ***** ***** ******* results ** ~* **/* for ************ *****/***** *****. In * ***, ** that ****, *** ***** have ~***** ** ******* from * ****** ******. While **** ****** ******** to *** ******, * 16 ****** ************ ************ system ******* *** ** days, ***** **** ****** 6PBs ** ******* ****** a *** ******* **** drives **** ***** **** hundreds ** ********* ** dollars.

Codecs *** ***

******* *** **** **** of ************ *****, ********** surveillance ******* ** ** cameras ********* *** ** standard *** ** **** small **********. *** **** this ******? ******.

***** ****** *** *********** / ************* *** *** act ** *********** ** the ******* ******* ** reducing ********* / ******* consumption.

****** ***** ***** ** every ***** *** *** unique ***** ** ********** wasteful ** **** ****** are ****** **** * small ****** ** ******* colors. ****** ******** ***** by ******** *** ****** of ****** ******** ***** tracking ***** ****** **** the **** ** ******* values, ******** ** ** transmit *** ***** ******* of ****.

Inter **. ***** ***** ***********

***** *** *** *********** approaches ** ***********: *****-***** and *****-*****. ** ** critical ** ********** *** distinctions ******* *** *** as **** ****** ********* consumption, ********** ***** ************, and ******* *****.

  • *****-***** *********** ** ****** a ****** ***** **** but *** ****** ****** (example - *****)
  • *****-***** *********** ** ****** multiple ****** *** ****** single ****** (******** - H.264, *.***, ****-*)

*** ****** ******* *****-***** compression *** **** **** some ******* **** ***** and ***** ***** ***********.

Intra-frame ***********

*****-***** *********** **** ***** at *** ***** ** a ****, ***** *** best ** ******** **** is ** **** *****. Even ****** ***** ** a ****** ** ******, intra-frame *********** **** **** a ***** ** * time, ******** *** "******." An *****-***** ***** ******'* individual ****** **** **** the ****** ** * movie:

*** ****** ** **** this ** ****** ** do *************** *** **** significantly ******** *****. *** instance, * *****/***** ***** stream ***** ** *****-***** compression **** ***** *** have *** ******* ******* from ~**** **/* ** ~40Mb/s. *******, *** ******** is **** **** **** savings *** ********* ** you ******* ******* ******.

Inter-frame ***********

***** *****-***** ***********, *** only ** *** ***** within *** ***** *******, the ***** ******** ******** frames ** ******* ******** the *****. **** ** feasible ******* ***** **** little ******* **** *** frame ** *** ****. For *******, ***** *** same ***** ** * person ******, *****-***** *********** would **** **** *** subject's ***.

**** ** **** ** a ***** ***** ********* static, ******* **** ******* in *** ***** ***** substantial *********/*******. *** ********, the **** *****/***** ****** that ***** **** ****/* with *****, ** *****-***** only *****, *** **** need ***/* **** *.***, a ***** **** **** both.

*******, *** **** ******** to *****-***** *********** ** that ** ** *** more *************** *********, ***** can ******** *********** *** quality ***** (******** *****).

I ** * ******

***** *** *** *** frame ***** ** *****-***** compression **** ** *.***/*.***.

*-******

*** ***** ***** ** a ***** ***** ** pictures ** ****** ** I-frame, ***** *** *****-*****, and ** *********** * full ***** ** *****, as ******* ** **** changes ***** ** * frames. *** ******** ******* two *-****** ** ******** to ** *-***** ********, GOV (***** ** *****), or *** (***** ** pictures).

** ** *******, **** image ***** *** *-***** of ** ******* ***** used ** *** ******* (click *** **** ****):

i-frame contains full frame information

*-******

*-****** ********* *** **** image ** *** ******** I-frame ** **** **** the ******* ** *** scene. ******* *** ** small, **** ** ******* noise ** ***** ******* movement, ** *****, **** as * *** ****** moving **** ****** ** preset. *** * ** P-frame ****** *** "**********."

*** ******* **** ** a *-***** **** *** test ***** *** ** seen ** *** ***** below (***** *** **** size). **** *** ***** near *** ****, ***** cars ******, *** ****** foliage ** *** *****, are **** ** *******.

p-frame contains only changes in scene

******* ***** ******** ** the **** *****, *** P-frame ******* *** ** seen "********" **** **** other, ***** *** **** I-frame ** **** (~** seconds).

Other ***** *****

**** **** ***** *** other ***** ***** ** addition ** * *** P, **** ** *, SI, *** **, ****** they *** ********* ****** in ************. **** ** cameras ******* *-***** *******, but *** *** ***** are ******* ** ******** decoding ****, ** **** are ********* *** ****.

Standard ******

** ** ****, **** new *********** ***** *** H.264. ***** *.*** ******* are *** ****** *** VMS *********** ** *********, CPU **** *********, *** lack ** ********** ***** support, *** ******* ********* gains **** **** *.*** as *** **** ****** option (*** ***** *** more *******).

***** ** ***** **** in **** ***********, ********* when ******** ** *** spec ** *** ********** applications **** ** *** or ***** *********. *******, manufacturers **** ***** ** limit ******* *** *****, with**** ****** *** ********* an ***** ******.

******** ** ** *****-***** codec ******* ** *****, but ******** (*** *****). It *** **** ***** for *** *** ** Avigilon, *** *** **** near ******* ****** *** in *******/** *****. ******, **** *********'* ***-**(**** ***'* **************) ************** *** ********.

H.265 ******** *** ***** *******

*** *** **** *** years, *.*** *** **** the **** *** *****, promising ** ******* *.*** and ****** ******** ** another ~**%. *******, ***** are *** ******** ********** its ********** **************:

  • ******* *****:***** *** ****** **** MJPEG ** *.*** ******** in ******* ******* **********, often **-**% ** ****, our ***** ** *.*** show **** **-**% ******* over *.*** ** **** likely. ***** **** **** and *** ***** ******** in ****/******** ** **** of **** **** ******, the ******** ** *.*** are *** ** ********** as *** ***********.
  • ********* *** ****:** *** *****, ******* H.265 ******* ******** ************* more ********* **** **** equivalent ***/********** *.*** *******, in **** ***** ******, which ***** ******* *** viewing ************ ** **** installations.
  • *********** ********:******, ***** **** ********* H.265 ********, * ***-******* development *******, ****** **** limited ******* *** ** the ***** ****** ** current *.*** ****** *** limited *********/******* *******.
  • ******* ***** ***********:*******, ****** ** *.*** cameras *** ***** ****** up **** ***** *********** until *** ********** ** their ****** *******,******* *, ***** *** ******** in ** **** **** limited ********** ********. ****** manufacturers **** **** ** implement *.*** ***** *****'* 2.4 ****, *** ***** was ** *********** **** until **** ******* *** complete. ******* * ******* have ***** ******* ** 2019/2020, *** *** *********** is ***** ******* ** a ******* ** *********.

** ****** *.*** ** continue ** ******* ** it *******, *** ***** reasons ******** ***** **** it ********.

*** *** ***** ***.*** ** ******* ****** vs *.*********** *.*** ******* **** *******.

Proprietary ******

************ *** *** * handful ** *********** ******, but **** *** ** these *** ** *** in ****. ** ***** analog *******, ***** *** encoded, ****** *** ******* in *** **** ********* (i.e., * ***), ****** it ****** ** *** a *********** ***** ** the ************ ********** *** entire *** ** *** process.

*******, ** ******* ****** video ** ********** *** then **** ** ******** this ******* ***** ** a ********/*** *** ******* and ******** **. *********** codecs ******** *** ********** of *******, ********, *** displaying ***** ** **** must **** ** ********** to *** ***. *** high ***** ** ***** this *** ******** *********** codecs **** ********* **** IP ****** ************ ******.

Mobotix ***** *********

*******'******** *** **** ****** known *********** ***** **** in ***** ************. ********** in ****, ***** ******** inter-frame ***********, ********* **** MJPEG *** ******** ********* consumption ******** ** ** (*** *** *****). *******, ***** ** is ***********, **** *** 3rd ***** ***** ******* it, ******* **** ** either *** *******'* *** VMS ** ** *** Mobotix ******* ** *****. Furthermore, *.***'* ********* *********** is ********* **** ***** than *** ********** ***** stream, ******* ******** *** attractiveness.

Smart ******

** *** **** *-* years, *.*** *** *.*** smart ****** **** ****** common, ****** ** ******* reduce ******** ******** ** standard *.***/*. ******* *** these ***** ****** ******** varies, *** ********* **** use *** **********, ******** below. ******* ****** *** our***** ***** ******** **** ******* ** these ************.

Smart ***********

******* ** ******** *** same *********** ***** ** the ****** *****, ***** codecs *********** ****** *********** for ******** ** *** camera's ***. *** *******, looking ** *** ***** below, *********** ***** ** set ** "***" *** the ******** ****** ** keep ******* ****, *** the ***** ********** *** be *** ** "****", since ** ** *** need ******* ** *** white ****.

dynamic compression varies depending on activity

Dynamic *-***** ********

******, ***** ****** ********* dynamically ****** *-***** ******** based ** ******** ** the *****. ** ** a ***** *** ****** or ** ******, *** camera ***** *-****** ************ (5, **, ** ******* or ****), *** **** activity ** ******** ** the *****, ** *********** sends ** *-***** *** switches **** ** ****** (typically * ******) *-***** intervals ** **** ** activity *********.

**** ***** **** * stream ******** ***** *** effects ** ******* *-***** interval:

Smart ***** ********

** *** *****, ***** codecs **** ******* ******** significantly, ~**% ** * minimum, *** ** ** 95%+ ** **** ******. These ****** *** **** effective ** ***** ******, as *-***** ********* ****** longer *** *********** ****** due ** *** **** of ********. *** ******** ***** ******** **** *******.

H.264 **. ***** *******

***** *.*** ** ******* the **** ****** **** codec ** ************, *** many ***** * ****** debate ******* ***** ******* loss ******** ** *****, and **** ***** ** believe *.*** ** ********, even *****. ************ *.*** ** ***** test***** ****, **** ******** configured, *.*** ******** *** same ******* ******* ** MJPEG.

*******, ***** *** **** issues **** *** ********* quality, *********:

  • ******* **** *********** ******:** ************** ********* *** *** ****, the ***** **** **** quality ***********. *** ***** ****** ************ *********** Comparison*** **** ******* *** how ******** ************* ****** compression.
  • **** ********** ******:**** ****** ***** *** visible ** ******* ******, where ***** ** **** of ****** - *************, crowds, ***.
  • ******* *** ******** *** rates:******* **** *** *** bit **** ** *** too ***, *** ***** will **** ******* ***********.

*******, ** **** *****, even **** ***** ******* settings, *.*** *** ********* quality ******* ** ***** in *** *****.

Scalable ******

**** ****** *** **** support * ****** **********. For ********, ******** **** a *** ****** ** a *** *** ***** MJPEG ** *.***, ******** either ******** * ********** new ****** ** *********** (i.e. **-**********) *** *** stream ** **** ** 1MP. *******, ** **** cases *** **** ** change *** ****** ********** without ********* * *** stream, *** ********, ** you *** ******* ** a ****** **** * lower ********* ********** (*.*., mobile) ** **** ** reduce ******* **** ** older *****.

* ******* ***** ** codecs, ****** '********', *** do **** *************, ******* having ** ******* * new ****** ** **-******* an ******** ******. * scalable ***** *** *********** 'pick' *** ****** ** resolution ****** **** **** out ** * ******. This ****** ******* ****** or ********** **** **** as **** ** *********** adjusting ********** / *** for ****** / ****** clients.

***** *** *** **** known ******** ******:

  • *** ** *.*** **** scalability. *** **** **** is **** ** ******** scalability **** *** ********* benefits ** *.***. *************, very *** ************* ******* this. **** ********** **** through *****-********* (******* ******** streams ************** ** ********* resolution/frame *****).
  • ********, ***** ** *********** MJPEG, **** *** ******** of ***********. **** ** the ***** **** ******** traditionally **** *** *** phased *** ** *** cameras. *** **** ******** of ********, **** *****, is ******* *********/******* ******** compared ** *.***, **** partially ****** ** *******.

*** *********** *** **** very ****, **** ****** actual ******** ******* ************ in **** ******* (** least ** *****) *** several *****. **** *** bitrate ********** ** *.*** smart ****** (***** ******* little ** ** *** VMS ***********) *** *.*** taking **********, *** ** unlikely ** ****** * major ****** ** ************ codecs.

Future ******

***** **** *********** ****** are ********* ** *******, it ** ****** ******** that *** *** ************ ones **** **** **** adoption ** ************.

*** ********, **** ********** claim ******* ********* ******* from ***** *********** ******, such ********* ******** *** / EdgeVis. *******, **** ***** require **** ****** ************* and *** ********** ** implement ***** ****** ** their ********. ************, ***** the *********** ******* ********** of ***** ******, ***** are ********** **** *** majority ** ******* *.*** recorders/VMS, *** ********** ** development ** *** ***** proprietary ****** ** **** more ********.

**** **** ********* ******'**** *** ********* ** ************* ** surveillance, ********** ** * royalty-free *********** ** *.*** (which *** ************ *** ******* ****). *******, ***** ****** saw ****** ** ** interest **** *************, **** no ************ ******** ****** to ***** ****, *** have **** ****** ** traction.

What ****** ** ******?

**** ** ****, *** best ***** *********** *** most *** ***** ** H.264 **** ***** ***** support ** ***** ****** significantly ******** ********** ** H.264 **** ******* *********.

*.*** ** *************, *** in **** ***** **** be ***** *** *** to *** ******* ***********. However, ** ** ******* stronger *** **** ***** used ** ***-**-*** ******/*** systems **** * ****** manufacturer (*.*., *****, *********, etc.) ***** ************* ****** are *********.

***** ******* * ***** for ********** ************ *** those *** **** (******* unreasonably) **** **** *****-***** compression.

[****: **** *** ********** published ** ****, *** substantially **-******* ** ******* technology ******** ** *.*** and ***** ******.]

Comments (19)

Very good guide!

10 points!

Great Update!

One question about:

While the change from MJPEG to H.264 resulted in drastic bitrate reductions, often 50-75%, our tests of H.265 show that 15-30% savings over H.264 is more likely.

Was the change usually from MJPEG to h.264 directly, or was there often a baby step of MPEG-4 (Part 2) involved? If so, how big was the change from MPEG-4 to h.264?

Was the change usually from MJPEG to h.264 directly, or was there often a baby step of MPEG-4 (Part 2) involved?

For MP, the move was straight from MJPEG to H.264. See 2008 article - H.264 makes Megapixel go Mainstream.

how big was the change from MPEG-4 to h.264?

How big the change depends on actual codec implementations and scenes. So it's always a challenging question. In the entertainment industry, assuming very good implementation of codecs in both cases ~40%. Practically it always depends...

 

However, H.264 has 2 very sufficient differences vs MPEG4(part2):


1) In H.264 DCT( discrete cosine transform) is done in integer values. 
In MPEG4(part2)(as well as in MPEG1,MPEG2,H.261,H.263) the DCT was done in float values, and standard did not dictate how accurate should it be. So while encoders used one accuracy(due to the hardware of software specifics), decoders doing inverse DCT used another formula (accuracy), which led to the error accumulation with every next P frame. So, by the end of the GOP(with new I frame) it was sort of re-synchronization. Visually it led to image quality jump with every new I frame(typically every second). You might remember this visual effect of MPEG4, that image changes significantly every second. Not the case with H.264. 

This is the reason why GOP size was very limited in MPEG4(image degradation accumulation). It's not the case in H.264. Practically H.264 GOP size could be very huge( practically unlimited). The only limitation comes from editing software( in order to decode frame N inside the GOP, decoder have to decode all previous frames).

So, H.264 made a huge step forward eliminating GOP size issue and image degradation towards the end of the GOP. 

 

2) deblocking filter became part of the standard. So they have to be universally implemented across all H.264 codecs. Wich also made H.264 stream look the same on any device. 

 

So, H.264 is not only bandwidth saver but solves some fundamental issues of previous standards.  

 

Excellent article, the inclusion of all the smart codec data is very useful.

Excellent article. It will add high value add for users. Grate Job.

Sounds like there is always room for improvement on H. 264, but it has proven to be the foundation in which to build on. The H. 265 sounds good at the drawing board, but when put into practice, it has its "ghosts" to be worked out.

I have a better understanding of compression

Thanks for taking the mystery out of compression!

Good article. 

Few points:

P-frames reference the full image of the previous I-frame to send only the changes in the scene. 

Just in case: P frame reference the full image of any I or P previous frames.  Advanced codecs can refer to multiple frames back minimizing the difference(part of the image could be taken from one reference frame, another part form another). Practically P frame most of the time refers previous P frame.  


 

MISC: as a paradox, typically in the surveillance industry(due to static scenes)  H.264 takes less CPU to decode than MJPEG. (since most of the time most of the image parts difference with prev frame is about zero). 

 

H.265 is designed in such a way that besides potential bandwidth savings it's better parallelized for multiple CPU cores to encode/decode. 

Thank you for the excellent summary and outline to explain CODECS. Well done!

With "Inter Framing" if I set my HD to record on motion is there further compression or are they separate?

Motion based recording does not 'further compress' video, it simply determines when to record video or not at all.

I would like to know more about SVC.I am completely ignorant on the topic.Can it be used also to obtain rtsp streams or does it work only with a server/vms that supports the function?

Luca, we know no video surveillance manufacturer that offers a scalable video codec today. It's effectively not used.

Today, it's almost always H.264, H.265 combined with smart codecs, no svc.

Actually UNV allows to enable SVC in the video page.Checking around IPVM i've seen also tests you did with Vivotek

 

My mistake to say none are 'offered'. 

My point is none are used. For example, we have never heard Uniview nor Vivotek recommend using SVC nor any VMSes do so for those cameras.

We are not against SVC, there is just no sign that anyone on the manufacturing side is promoting or recommending using it.

My point is none are used.

Hikvision, Dahua and Vivotek all have a SVC-T setting exposed, that works with at least their own recorders. Of course, this is actually enabled because of the underlying SOC supporting it, as you once mentioned: 

Does Hikvision SVC Really Work?  

On the other hand, neither you nor I consider this a full implementation of SVC, because it is only frame-rate reduction based, temporal -T.  The h.26x SVC we were all waiting for, one with spatial reduction -S, (ala JPEG2000) never arrived: 

SVC - A Better H.264 Coming For Video Surveillance

 

Excellent article. It was good to see and understand how they test to determine what makes one better then the other. Great Job!!

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,380 reports, 860 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Video Surveillance Architecture 101 on Feb 18, 2020
Video surveillance can be designed and deployed in a number of ways. This 101 examines the most common options and architectures used in...
VSaaS 101 on Mar 25, 2020
Video Surveillance as a Service (VSaaS) is the common industry term for cloud video. But what does it mean? How does it all work? Inside this...
Network Cabling for Video Surveillance on Jan 15, 2020
In this guide, we explain the fundamentals of network cabling for video surveillance networks, how they should be installed, and the differences in...
VMS 101 on Mar 03, 2020
This guide teaches the fundamentals about video management software. Inside, we cover: NVR vs VMS Viewing Video - What are common client...
Video Surveillance Cameras 101 on Feb 25, 2020
Cameras come in many shapes, sizes and specifications. This 101 examines the basics of cameras and features used in 2020. In this report, we...
BICSI For IP Video Surveillance Guide on Feb 11, 2020
Spend enough time around networks and eventually someone will mention BICSI, the oft-referenced but only vaguely known standards body prevalent in...
Video Analytics 101 on Mar 16, 2020
This guide teaches the fundamentals of video surveillance analytics. Inside we cover: Why Use Video Analytics Video Analytics Warning Where...
Bandwidth Fundamentals For Video Surveillance on Jan 13, 2020
Bandwidth is the most fundamental element of computer networking for video surveillance systems. Because video surveillance can consume an immense...
Video Surveillance History on May 06, 2020
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to an emerging AI cloud era and now impacted by...
Camera Analytics Shootout 2020 - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Jan 22, 2020
Analytics are hot again, thanks to a slew of AI-powered cameras, but whose analytics really work? And how do these new smart cameras compare to top...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Remove Dahua and Hikvision Equipment "Immediately" Or Else Banned From US Government Contracts on Jul 10, 2020
The US government has directed contractors to remove covered equipment, such as Dahua, Hikvision, and Huawei Hisilicon products, "immediately." If...
ZeroEyes Presents Firearm Detection Video Analytics on Jul 09, 2020
ZeroEyes presented its Firearm detection Video Analytics system at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. A 30-minute video from ZeroEyes...
Directory of 162 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Jul 09, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers to help you see and research what options are available. There are...
Clinton Public View Monitor (PVM) Mask Detection Tested on Jul 09, 2020
Face mask detection, or more specifically not wearing one, is expanding amidst the pandemic. Clinton Electronics has added this capability to their...
These Florida Real Estate Agents Are Now Selling "SafeCheck USA" Temperature Detectors on Jul 09, 2020
The "Kakon Brothers", William and Nathan, are self-described "south Florida Power Agents specializing in Luxury Real Estate" who "have closed over...
Avigilon ACC Cloud Tested on Jul 08, 2020
Avigilon merged Blue and ACC, adding VSaaS features to its on-premise VMS, offering remote video and health monitoring that was previously limited...
Hikvision's India Dominance Faces Threat on Jul 08, 2020
While Hikvision has become a dominant video surveillance provider in India, recent tension between the governments of India and the PRC is...
The US Fight Over Facial Recognition Explained on Jul 08, 2020
The controversy around facial recognition has grown significantly in 2020, with Congress members and activists speaking out against it while video...
Sperry West / Alibaba Tablet Temperature Measurement Tested on Jul 07, 2020
In April, we ordered a ~$500 temperature tablet from Alibaba. We set it to the side while doing 18 other temperature screening tests but, after...
Facial Recognition: Weak Sales, Anti Regulation, No Favorite, Says Security Integrators on Jul 07, 2020
While facial recognition has gained greater prominence, a new IPVM study of security systems integrators shows weak sales, opposition to...