Surveillance Codec Guide

By: IPVM Team, Published on Jan 03, 2019

Codecs are core to surveillance, with names like H.264, H.265, and MJPEG commonly cited. How do they work? Why should you use them? What issues may you face? In this tutorial, we examine this in-depth covering:

  • Uncompressed vs. Compressed Video
  • Inter vs. Intra Frame Compression
  • I vs P Frames
  • Other Frame Types
  • H.264 vs H.265 vs MJPEG
  • H.265 Emergence
  • Smart Codec Growth
  • Proprietary Codecs
  • Scalable Codecs - JPEG2000, SVC
  • Quality of Codecs
  • Codec Support in Surveillance
  • Future Codecs
  • What Codecs to Choose?

****** *** **** ** surveillance, **** ***** **** H.264, *.***, *** ***** commonly *****. *** ** they ****? *** ****** you *** ****? **** issues *** *** ****? In **** ********, ** examine **** **-***** ********:

  • ************ **. ********** *****
  • ***** **. ***** ***** Compression
  • * ** * ******
  • ***** ***** *****
  • *.*** ** *.*** ** MJPEG
  • *.*** *********
  • ***** ***** ******
  • *********** ******
  • ******** ****** - ********, SVC
  • ******* ** ******
  • ***** ******* ** ************
  • ****** ******
  • **** ****** ** ******?

[***************]

Uncompressed **. ********** *****

*********** *** ************ ***** is **********, ** ******* and ******* ******* ***** easily ** **** ******* for ************.

**** ***** ** *********, it ** ********* ************. There *** * **** factors ** *** **** of ************ *****:

  • *** ***** ** ****** supported *** **** *****
  • *** ***** ****** ** pixels *** *****
  • *** ***** ****** ** frames *** ******

** **** *** ***** size, *** ******** **** of *****. ***'* **** through **** ** *****.

***** ******

**** ***** ** ***** a ***** *********** ** a ****** ****** * range. *** ***** ********** how ********* *** ***** can ** ******* *** also ******* ******* *** bandwidth/size.

  • **** *********, ***** ********** has * ***** ** 256 ****** (* ****) with * ************ *****, 255 ************ ***** *** the ******* ** ******* representing ****** ** ****.
  • ** ******, ****** *** surveillance ***** ***** ******** color ** *** ***** of ****** ****** ** represent *** *** ****** is *** *******. ** bits ** **,*** ****** is ******.

**********/********* ******

*** ***** *** ******* are *** ****** ** understand ** **** *** the********** ** *** *** camera, *********** ********** ***** vertical ***** ******:

** **** ******** *** ******, ****** ****, *****, 30fps, ***. *** **** majority ** ************ ******* (>80% ** *** *******) are ******** ** ******* 5 *** ** *** (see******* ***** **** ***** Surveillance ****).

Adding ** **

**** ** ******** **** is *********** *** ******* uncompressed ***** *** ******. Take * ***** ***** camera ** *****. ************ it ** *** ******* of *** *********:

*********** ***** ***** ******* results ** ~* **/* for ************ *****/***** *****. In * ***, ** that ****, *** ***** have ~***** ** ******* from * ****** ******. While **** ****** ******** to *** ******, * 16 ****** ************ ************ system ******* *** ** days, ***** **** ****** 6PBs ** ******* ****** a *** ******* **** drives **** ***** **** hundreds ** ********* ** dollars.

Codecs *** ***

******* *** **** **** of ************ *****, ********** surveillance ******* ** ** cameras ********* *** ** standard *** ** **** small **********. *** **** this ******? ******.

***** ****** *** *********** / ************* *** *** act ** *********** ** the ******* ******* ** reducing ********* / ******* consumption.

****** ***** ***** ** every ***** *** *** unique ***** ** ********** wasteful ** **** ****** are ****** **** * small ****** ** ******* colors. ****** ******** ***** by ******** *** ****** of ****** ******** ***** tracking ***** ****** **** the **** ** ******* values, ******** ** ** transmit *** ***** ******* of ****.

Inter **. ***** ***** ***********

***** *** *** *********** approaches ** ***********: *****-***** and *****-*****. ** ** critical ** ********** *** distinctions ******* *** *** as **** ****** ********* consumption, ********** ***** ************, and ******* *****.

  • *****-***** *********** ** ****** a ****** ***** **** but *** ****** ****** (example - *****)
  • *****-***** *********** ** ****** multiple ****** *** ****** single ****** (******** - H.264, *.***, ****-*)

*** ****** ******* *****-***** compression *** **** **** some ******* **** ***** and ***** ***** ***********.

Intra-frame ***********

*****-***** *********** **** ***** at *** ***** ** a ****, ***** *** best ** ******** **** is ** **** *****. Even ****** ***** ** a ****** ** ******, intra-frame *********** **** **** a ***** ** * time, ******** *** "******." An *****-***** ***** ******'* individual ****** **** **** the ****** ** * movie:

*** ****** ** **** this ** ****** ** do *************** *** **** significantly ******** *****. *** instance, * *****/***** ***** stream ***** ** *****-***** compression **** ***** *** have *** ******* ******* from ~**** **/* ** ~40Mb/s. *******, *** ******** is **** **** **** savings *** ********* ** you ******* ******* ******.

Inter-frame ***********

***** *****-***** ***********, *** only ** *** ***** within *** ***** *******, the ***** ******** ******** frames ** ******* ******** the *****. **** ** feasible ******* ***** **** little ******* **** *** frame ** *** ****. For *******, ***** *** same ***** ** * person ******, *****-***** *********** would **** **** *** subject's ***.

**** ** **** ** a ***** ***** ********* static, ******* **** ******* in *** ***** ***** substantial *********/*******. *** ********, the **** *****/***** ****** that ***** **** ****/* with *****, ** *****-***** only *****, *** **** need ***/* **** *.***, a ***** **** **** both.

*******, *** **** ******** to *****-***** *********** ** that ** ** *** more *************** *********, ***** can ******** *********** *** quality ***** (******** *****).

I ** * ******

***** *** *** *** frame ***** ** *****-***** compression **** ** *.***/*.***.

*-******

*** ***** ***** ** a ***** ***** ** pictures ** ****** ** I-frame, ***** *** *****-*****, and ** *********** * full ***** ** *****, as ******* ** **** changes ***** ** * frames. *** ******** ******* two *-****** ** ******** to ** *-***** ********, GOV (***** ** *****), or *** (***** ** pictures).

** ** *******, **** image ***** *** *-***** of ** ******* ***** used ** *** ******* (click *** **** ****):

i-frame contains full frame information

*-******

*-****** ********* *** **** image ** *** ******** I-frame ** **** **** the ******* ** *** scene. ******* *** ** small, **** ** ******* noise ** ***** ******* movement, ** *****, **** as * *** ****** moving **** ****** ** preset. *** * ** P-frame ****** *** "**********."

*** ******* **** ** a *-***** **** *** test ***** *** ** seen ** *** ***** below (***** *** **** size). **** *** ***** near *** ****, ***** cars ******, *** ****** foliage ** *** *****, are **** ** *******.

p-frame contains only changes in scene

******* ***** ******** ** the **** *****, *** P-frame ******* *** ** seen "********" **** **** other, ***** *** **** I-frame ** **** (~** seconds).

Other ***** *****

**** **** ***** *** other ***** ***** ** addition ** * *** P, **** ** *, SI, *** **, ****** they *** ********* ****** in ************. **** ** cameras ******* *-***** *******, but *** *** ***** are ******* ** ******** decoding ****, ** **** are ********* *** ****.

Standard ******

** ** ****, **** new *********** ***** *** H.264. ***** *.*** ******* are *** ****** *** VMS *********** ** *********, CPU **** *********, *** lack ** ********** ***** support, *** ******* ********* gains **** **** *.*** as *** **** ****** option (*** ***** *** more *******).

***** ** ***** **** in **** ***********, ********* when ******** ** *** spec ** *** ********** applications **** ** *** or ***** *********. *******, manufacturers **** ***** ** limit ******* *** *****, with**** ****** *** ********* an ***** ******.

******** ** ** *****-***** codec ******* ** *****, but ******** (*** *****). It *** **** ***** for *** *** ** Avigilon, *** *** **** near ******* ****** *** in *******/** *****. ******, **** *********'* ***-**(**** ***'* **************) ************** *** ********.

H.265 ******** *** ***** *******

*** *** **** *** years, *.*** *** **** the **** *** *****, promising ** ******* *.*** and ****** ******** ** another ~**%. *******, ***** are *** ******** ********** its ********** **************:

  • ******* *****:***** *** ****** **** MJPEG ** *.*** ******** in ******* ******* **********, often **-**% ** ****, our ***** ** *.*** show **** **-**% ******* over *.*** ** **** likely. ***** **** **** and *** ***** ******** in ****/******** ** **** of **** **** ******, the ******** ** *.*** are *** ** ********** as *** ***********.
  • ********* *** ****:** *** *****, ******* H.265 ******* ******** ************* more ********* **** **** equivalent ***/********** *.*** *******, in **** ***** ******, which ***** ******* *** viewing ************ ** **** installations.
  • *********** ********:******, ***** **** ********* H.265 ********, * ***-******* development *******, ****** **** limited ******* *** ** the ***** ****** ** current *.*** ****** *** limited *********/******* *******.
  • ******* ***** ***********:*******, ****** ** *.*** cameras *** ***** ****** up **** ***** *********** until *** ********** ** their ****** *******,******* *, ***** *** ******** in ** **** **** limited ********** ********. ****** manufacturers **** **** ** implement *.*** ***** *****'* 2.4 ****, *** ***** was ** *********** **** until **** ******* *** complete. ******* * ******* have ***** ******* ** 2019/2020, *** *** *********** is ***** ******* ** a ******* ** *********.

** ****** *.*** ** continue ** ******* ** it *******, *** ***** reasons ******** ***** **** it ********.

*** *** ***** ***.*** ** ******* ****** vs *.*********** *.*** ******* **** *******.

Proprietary ******

************ *** *** * handful ** *********** ******, but **** *** ** these *** ** *** in ****. ** ***** analog *******, ***** *** encoded, ****** *** ******* in *** **** ********* (i.e., * ***), ****** it ****** ** *** a *********** ***** ** the ************ ********** *** entire *** ** *** process.

*******, ** ******* ****** video ** ********** *** then **** ** ******** this ******* ***** ** a ********/*** *** ******* and ******** **. *********** codecs ******** *** ********** of *******, ********, *** displaying ***** ** **** must **** ** ********** to *** ***. *** high ***** ** ***** this *** ******** *********** codecs **** ********* **** IP ****** ************ ******.

Mobotix ***** *********

*******'******** *** **** ****** known *********** ***** **** in ***** ************. ********** in ****, ***** ******** inter-frame ***********, ********* **** MJPEG *** ******** ********* consumption ******** ** ** (*** *** *****). *******, ***** ** is ***********, **** *** 3rd ***** ***** ******* it, ******* **** ** either *** *******'* *** VMS ** ** *** Mobotix ******* ** *****. Furthermore, *.***'* ********* *********** is ********* **** ***** than *** ********** ***** stream, ******* ******** *** attractiveness.

Smart ******

** *** **** *-* years, *.*** *** *.*** smart ****** **** ****** common, ****** ** ******* reduce ******** ******** ** standard *.***/*. ******* *** these ***** ****** ******** varies, *** ********* **** use *** **********, ******** below. ******* ****** *** our***** ***** ******** **** ******* ** these ************.

Smart ***********

******* ** ******** *** same *********** ***** ** the ****** *****, ***** codecs *********** ****** *********** for ******** ** *** camera's ***. *** *******, looking ** *** ***** below, *********** ***** ** set ** "***" *** the ******** ****** ** keep ******* ****, *** the ***** ********** *** be *** ** "****", since ** ** *** need ******* ** *** white ****.

dynamic compression varies depending on activity

Dynamic *-***** ********

******, ***** ****** ********* dynamically ****** *-***** ******** based ** ******** ** the *****. ** ** a ***** *** ****** or ** ******, *** camera ***** *-****** ************ (5, **, ** ******* or ****), *** **** activity ** ******** ** the *****, ** *********** sends ** *-***** *** switches **** ** ****** (typically * ******) *-***** intervals ** **** ** activity *********.

**** ***** **** * stream ******** ***** *** effects ** ******* *-***** interval:

Smart ***** ********

** *** *****, ***** codecs **** ******* ******** significantly, ~**% ** * minimum, *** ** ** 95%+ ** **** ******. These ****** *** **** effective ** ***** ******, as *-***** ********* ****** longer *** *********** ****** due ** *** **** of ********. *** ******** ***** ******** **** *******.

H.264 **. ***** *******

***** *.*** ** ******* the **** ****** **** codec ** ************, *** many ***** * ****** debate ******* ***** ******* loss ******** ** *****, and **** ***** ** believe *.*** ** ********, even *****. ************ *.*** ** ***** test***** ****, **** ******** configured, *.*** ******** *** same ******* ******* ** MJPEG.

*******, ***** *** **** issues **** *** ********* quality, *********:

  • ******* **** *********** ******:** ************** ********* *** *** ****, the ***** **** **** quality ***********. *** ***** ****** ************ *********** Comparison*** **** ******* *** how ******** ************* ****** compression.
  • **** ********** ******:**** ****** ***** *** visible ** ******* ******, where ***** ** **** of ****** - *************, crowds, ***.
  • ******* *** ******** *** rates:******* **** *** *** bit **** ** *** too ***, *** ***** will **** ******* ***********.

*******, ** **** *****, even **** ***** ******* settings, *.*** *** ********* quality ******* ** ***** in *** *****.

Scalable ******

**** ****** *** **** support * ****** **********. For ********, ******** **** a *** ****** ** a *** *** ***** MJPEG ** *.***, ******** either ******** * ********** new ****** ** *********** (i.e. **-**********) *** *** stream ** **** ** 1MP. *******, ** **** cases *** **** ** change *** ****** ********** without ********* * *** stream, *** ********, ** you *** ******* ** a ****** **** * lower ********* ********** (*.*., mobile) ** **** ** reduce ******* **** ** older *****.

* ******* ***** ** codecs, ****** '********', *** do **** *************, ******* having ** ******* * new ****** ** **-******* an ******** ******. * scalable ***** *** *********** 'pick' *** ****** ** resolution ****** **** **** out ** * ******. This ****** ******* ****** or ********** **** **** as **** ** *********** adjusting ********** / *** for ****** / ****** clients.

***** *** *** **** known ******** ******:

  • *** ** *.*** **** scalability. *** **** **** is **** ** ******** scalability **** *** ********* benefits ** *.***. *************, very *** ************* ******* this. **** ********** **** through *****-********* (******* ******** streams ************** ** ********* resolution/frame *****).
  • ********, ***** ** *********** MJPEG, **** *** ******** of ***********. **** ** the ***** **** ******** traditionally **** *** *** phased *** ** *** cameras. *** **** ******** of ********, **** *****, is ******* *********/******* ******** compared ** *.***, **** partially ****** ** *******.

*** *********** *** **** very ****, **** ****** actual ******** ******* ************ in **** ******* (** least ** *****) *** several *****. **** *** bitrate ********** ** *.*** smart ****** (***** ******* little ** ** *** VMS ***********) *** *.*** taking **********, *** ** unlikely ** ****** * major ****** ** ************ codecs.

Future ******

***** **** *********** ****** are ********* ** *******, it ** ****** ******** that *** *** ************ ones **** **** **** adoption ** ************.

*** ********, **** ********** claim ******* ********* ******* from ***** *********** ******, such ********* ******** *** / EdgeVis. *******, **** ***** require **** ****** ************* and *** ********** ** implement ***** ****** ** their ********. ************, ***** the *********** ******* ********** of ***** ******, ***** are ********** **** *** majority ** ******* *.*** recorders/VMS, *** ********** ** development ** *** ***** proprietary ****** ** **** more ********.

**** **** ********* ******'**** *** ********* ** ************* ** surveillance, ********** ** * royalty-free *********** ** *.*** (which *** ************ *** ******* ****). *******, ***** ****** saw ****** ** ** interest **** *************, **** no ************ ******** ****** to ***** ****, *** have **** ****** ** traction.

What ****** ** ******?

**** ** ****, *** best ***** *********** *** most *** ***** ** H.264 **** ***** ***** support ** ***** ****** significantly ******** ********** ** H.264 **** ******* *********.

*.*** ** *************, *** in **** ***** **** be ***** *** *** to *** ******* ***********. However, ** ** ******* stronger *** **** ***** used ** ***-**-*** ******/*** systems **** * ****** manufacturer (*.*., *****, *********, etc.) ***** ************* ****** are *********.

***** ******* * ***** for ********** ************ *** those *** **** (******* unreasonably) **** **** *****-***** compression.

[****: **** *** ********** published ** ****, *** substantially **-******* ** ******* technology ******** ** *.*** and ***** ******.]

Comments (18)

Very good guide!

10 points!

Great Update!

One question about:

While the change from MJPEG to H.264 resulted in drastic bitrate reductions, often 50-75%, our tests of H.265 show that 15-30% savings over H.264 is more likely.

Was the change usually from MJPEG to h.264 directly, or was there often a baby step of MPEG-4 (Part 2) involved? If so, how big was the change from MPEG-4 to h.264?

Was the change usually from MJPEG to h.264 directly, or was there often a baby step of MPEG-4 (Part 2) involved?

For MP, the move was straight from MJPEG to H.264. See 2008 article - H.264 makes Megapixel go Mainstream.

how big was the change from MPEG-4 to h.264?

How big the change depends on actual codec implementations and scenes. So it's always a challenging question. In the entertainment industry, assuming very good implementation of codecs in both cases ~40%. Practically it always depends...

 

However, H.264 has 2 very sufficient differences vs MPEG4(part2):


1) In H.264 DCT( discrete cosine transform) is done in integer values. 
In MPEG4(part2)(as well as in MPEG1,MPEG2,H.261,H.263) the DCT was done in float values, and standard did not dictate how accurate should it be. So while encoders used one accuracy(due to the hardware of software specifics), decoders doing inverse DCT used another formula (accuracy), which led to the error accumulation with every next P frame. So, by the end of the GOP(with new I frame) it was sort of re-synchronization. Visually it led to image quality jump with every new I frame(typically every second). You might remember this visual effect of MPEG4, that image changes significantly every second. Not the case with H.264. 

This is the reason why GOP size was very limited in MPEG4(image degradation accumulation). It's not the case in H.264. Practically H.264 GOP size could be very huge( practically unlimited). The only limitation comes from editing software( in order to decode frame N inside the GOP, decoder have to decode all previous frames).

So, H.264 made a huge step forward eliminating GOP size issue and image degradation towards the end of the GOP. 

 

2) deblocking filter became part of the standard. So they have to be universally implemented across all H.264 codecs. Wich also made H.264 stream look the same on any device. 

 

So, H.264 is not only bandwidth saver but solves some fundamental issues of previous standards.  

 

Excellent article, the inclusion of all the smart codec data is very useful.

Excellent article. It will add high value add for users. Grate Job.

Sounds like there is always room for improvement on H. 264, but it has proven to be the foundation in which to build on. The H. 265 sounds good at the drawing board, but when put into practice, it has its "ghosts" to be worked out.

I have a better understanding of compression

Thanks for taking the mystery out of compression!

Good article. 

Few points:

P-frames reference the full image of the previous I-frame to send only the changes in the scene. 

Just in case: P frame reference the full image of any I or P previous frames.  Advanced codecs can refer to multiple frames back minimizing the difference(part of the image could be taken from one reference frame, another part form another). Practically P frame most of the time refers previous P frame.  


 

MISC: as a paradox, typically in the surveillance industry(due to static scenes)  H.264 takes less CPU to decode than MJPEG. (since most of the time most of the image parts difference with prev frame is about zero). 

 

H.265 is designed in such a way that besides potential bandwidth savings it's better parallelized for multiple CPU cores to encode/decode. 

Thank you for the excellent summary and outline to explain CODECS. Well done!

With "Inter Framing" if I set my HD to record on motion is there further compression or are they separate?

Motion based recording does not 'further compress' video, it simply determines when to record video or not at all.

I would like to know more about SVC.I am completely ignorant on the topic.Can it be used also to obtain rtsp streams or does it work only with a server/vms that supports the function?

Luca, we know no video surveillance manufacturer that offers a scalable video codec today. It's effectively not used.

Today, it's almost always H.264, H.265 combined with smart codecs, no svc.

Actually UNV allows to enable SVC in the video page.Checking around IPVM i've seen also tests you did with Vivotek

 

My mistake to say none are 'offered'. 

My point is none are used. For example, we have never heard Uniview nor Vivotek recommend using SVC nor any VMSes do so for those cameras.

We are not against SVC, there is just no sign that anyone on the manufacturing side is promoting or recommending using it.

My point is none are used.

Hikvision, Dahua and Vivotek all have a SVC-T setting exposed, that works with at least their own recorders. Of course, this is actually enabled because of the underlying SOC supporting it, as you once mentioned: 

Does Hikvision SVC Really Work?  

On the other hand, neither you nor I consider this a full implementation of SVC, because it is only frame-rate reduction based, temporal -T.  The h.26x SVC we were all waiting for, one with spatial reduction -S, (ala JPEG2000) never arrived: 

SVC - A Better H.264 Coming For Video Surveillance

 

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Bandwidth Fundamentals For Video Surveillance on Jan 13, 2020
Bandwidth is the most fundamental element of computer networking for video surveillance systems. Because video surveillance can consume an immense...
History of Video Surveillance on Jul 19, 2019
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to an emerging AI cloud era. The goal of this history is to...
Testing Bandwidth vs. Frame Rate on Jan 23, 2019
Selecting frame rate has a major impact on surveillance bandwidth and storage consumption. But with smart codecs now common and cameras more...
Bandwidth vs Low Light Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Geovision, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Feb 08, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance, but do all manufacturers' cameras perform the same? Are some more consistent...
H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...
Verkada Video Quality Problems Tested on May 23, 2019
Verkada suffers from numerous video quality problems, not found in commercial IP cameras, new IPVM testing of Verkada vs Axis and Hikvision...
Smart CODEC Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 03, 2019
Smart codecs are now nearly a standard feature in IP cameras, but our statistics show integrator adoption has not increased at the same rate. In...
False Verkada 'Unrivaled' Low Light Performance Claim Removed on Jun 12, 2019
Verkada falsely claimed that it delivered 'UNRIVALED LOW LIGHT PERFORMANCE' until IPVM questioned. In fact, Verkada's low light performance is...
Proactive CCTV "Only Affordable Video Archiving Solution" Profile on Aug 12, 2019
Proactive CCTV is claiming to offer "the only affordable video archiving solution on the market", reducing the storage typically required for H.265...

Most Recent Industry Reports

IronYun AI Analytics Tested on Feb 17, 2020
Taiwan startup IronYun has raised tens of millions for its "mission to be the leading Artificial Intelligence, big data video software as a service...
Access Control ADA and Disability Laws Tutorial on Feb 17, 2020
Safe access control is paramount, especially for those with disabilities. Most countries have codes to mandate safe building access for those...
ISC West 2020 Removes China Pavilion, No Plans To Cancel Or Postpone on Feb 17, 2020
ISC West plans to go on next month, amidst concerns over coronavirus. However, the Asia / China Pavilion has been removed, show organizers...
Hanwha Wisenet X Plus PTRZ Tested on Feb 14, 2020
Hanwha has released their PTRZ camera, the Wisenet X Plus XNV-6081Z, claiming the "modular design allows for easy installation". We bought and...
IPVM Conference 2020 on Feb 13, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our 2020 conference. This is the first and only industry event that will be 100% sponsor-free. Like IPVM online, the...
Bosch Dropping Dahua on Feb 13, 2020
Bosch has confirmed to IPVM that it is in the process of dropping Dahua, over the next year, as both IP camera contract manufacturer and recorder...
BluB0X Alleges Lenel, S2, Software House Are Dinosaurs on Feb 13, 2020
BluB0X is running an ad campaign labeling Lenel, S2, Software House, Honeywell, AMAG and more as dinosaurs: In a follow-up email to IPVM,...
London Live Police Face Recognition Visited on Feb 13, 2020
London police have officially begun using live facial recognition in select areas of the UK capital, sparking significant controversy. IPVM...
Converged vs Dedicated Networks For Surveillance Tutorial on Feb 12, 2020
Use the existing network or deploy a new one? This is a critical choice in designing video surveillance systems. Though 'convergence' was a big...