Favorite Video Analytic Manufacturers 2020

By IPVM Team, Published Feb 25, 2020, 09:10am EST (Info+)

Video analytics is now as hot as ever, driven by the excitement of advancing deep learning offers. But what are actually integrator's favorite?

In our 5th edition of this series (see 2011, 2014, 2016, and 2018 results), IPVM examines the top choices, trends, and rationales based on 200+ integrator responses.

[REMINDER: NO promotional use is ever allowed. If you see any person or manufacturer using these results in this way, please immediately report it to us info@ipvm.com]

****************

***** *** ******** ************ (********) *** yet *****, *** ******* ******* ************* from ****, **** * *** ************ in *** *** * **** *** minimally ********* ** ****. ********, *** 3rd ***** ******* *********** *********** **** the *********.

  • ***: ******** ******** ** ***** ***** in ** *** ***-** *********, **** over ** **** ********* ********* **** the **** ************, **** ********* *** results.
  • **: ****** *** *** ***** ** US ********* *** **** *** *** outside ** *** **. **** **** not ** *** *** * ** 2018.
  • ****: **** **** **** *** ***** to *** *** **** *** *** 3 *** ******** *** **** ******** responses ** *** ************ ** *** US.
  • ****: ******* *** *** ***** ** 2018 *** ******** * ****** ********* response **** ****. ******* **** **** a *** ********.
  • **: ******** *** ******* ** *** in ** ********* *** **** *** 2nd **** ***** ******* *** **. This *** * ******** ****** *** both ********* ******** ** ****.
  • *******/**** ********* ** *****, ****** **** were ******* ******* *** *** * in ****.

#1 - ******** *****

******** ******** #* *** *** *** straight ******* (**************** **** **** ******** ** ****). ***********, **** ** *** *** analytics ******** ** ******** ******* / VMS **** *** **** ****** *********:

  • "******** ** *** ******** ***** ********* provider. ** *** ********* ****** ** the ******** ******* *** *** *** are ****** ********** ****** ****** ********** facility."
  • "********. ** **** * **** ******* with ****, *** ********* **** **** and *** **** ** *** ****** instead ** ***** *** *****."
  • "********. **** *** *** ** ** in ****** *** ********** ******* ** the *********. ** **** ******* ***** for *******, *** ******* ********* ** any ******* **** ** *******."
  • "******** *** ***** ** ** *** else **** *****. *** ******** ********* are *** **** ******** *** ******** we **** ******."
  • "********. ** *****. ******* ****** ** non *** ******* *** *********, ********** search ** ***** ** *********."
  • "******** ********* *** ******** ******* *** been **** ******** *** ******* ** products ** ***** *** ******"
  • "********. **** *** ***** *** ****. A *** ** ********* ******* **, but **** *****'* **** **** ** better."
  • "******** ******* ** *** ******* ** software *** ******** **** ** ***."
  • "********, *** ***** ******** ****, ***** integration **** ***** ********."
  • "********. **** ** *** *** ********** is * ******* ******."
  • "********. **** **** ** ***** *** the ******** ** *****."
  • "******** - ********* ***-**-*** ******** **** analytics."
  • "********. **** ***********, **** ** *********."
  • "********, **** **** *** **** ** set **."

************, **** *********** ********** *** **** of ********** ***** *** *********** ****:

  • "********. ****-********* *** ***** ********** **** the ***. "
  • "********, ******* ** ** ***** *******, built **. ** ***** ****. "
  • "********. **** *****. "
  • "********, ***** ********* *** ***** *** best ********** ***** ****** ****** ***** sells ****** ** ****** ***********, ************ etc. **** ***** ******* *** **** down."
  • "********, ** ***** *****"

****** *********** **** ** #* ** US, **** *** #* ******* **

****** ******** ******* ********* ********* ** 2018, *** ****** ***** **** **** the *** ***** **** ** *** US, *** **** **** **** *** Genetec ******* *** **. **** ****** significantly ****** ********.

********* ********** ********* ********* **** ** use, ****** *************, *** **** ** additional ****:

  • "****** ******* ** ****** ***** ********* suite ***** **** *** ********* ** the **** ****** *** ** *** require ********** **** ** ********."
  • "****** ******. ******, **********, *** ****-*********. No ********** ********* ******** ** **** enough *** **** *********"
  • "****** *******, **** ******* ********* **** are *** *** ********* ** *********"
  • "******. *** **** ** **** *** platform **********"
  • "* ***** *** *** ***** ********* from ******"
  • "****** *** * **** ***. **** to *******"
  • "******. **** *** *********"
  • "****** ****** ** ***"

**** - ******* ******

**** ***** **** *** ***** ****** AI-based *********, ******* ********** ******* *** more ******** ********* **** *** ******* of**** ******-*** ** ****** ***. **** ***** received **** ********* ********** *********, ********* due ** *********** *** *********** ** simple ************:

  • "****. ** ****** **** **** ************ and *** *********** **** *** ****** platform *** *********."
  • "**** ******* ** **** ***** ** the ****** **** ******* **** ******. All ** ******* *** ***** *********"
  • "**** ******* **** ******* **** ***** in *********. *** ***** ********* ** option ***"
  • "****. **** *** *** **** ******* of ********* ********* ********."
  • "**** ****-***** ********* *** **** *** simple ************"
  • "****. **** **** * *** *** almost *** *** ******** *** ****"
  • "**** -*** ***** ** *********"
  • "**** *************. **** ******** ** ** cases"

*******, **** ******** *** ******* ****** of ********* ** *** **, **** negative ********* ********** **** ***********:

  • "*** ***** ********** *** **** **** some ** ****'* ********* **** ****** 4 *** ****. *** **** *** experience *** *** ****** ** **** using **** **** *** *** ******* to ***** ** ******* **** ** Milestone. *** **** *********."
  • "****. ***** ********* *** ******** ** best. ** **** ***** **** ** be ********** ** *** *******."
  • "****. **** *** ****** *** *** analytics **** ************."
  • "**** - ****** ********* **** *********** on ******* *****."
  • "**** ** ****'* **** **** **** customers ******"

********

******** *** #* ** *** ** and ******* *** **, * ***** show ** ******* ** ****, ******** to ******* ********* ********* ** ****.

******** *** ********* ** ******* ****************** *** ***** *********** ** ****, *** *********** ***** *** ****** integration **** ******** *****, *** **** Milestone, ** *** ** *** ******* reasons *** ******** **:

  • "********. ***** **** *** ****** ********** with *** *** ******** **** ** use (****** ******). ****, **** *** manufacturer **** ******* ** *********** **** BriefCam **** *** ***** *** ************. Their ********* **** ****** **** ** other ** *** ****** ****. **** beneficial ******** **** **** **** *** make * ********** **** *******"
  • "* **** ******** *** **** ******* of **'* ***** *********** **** *** systems. **'* *** ** *** *** vendors **** *** ** **** *** analyze ******** ***** ******** **** *** VMS ******* ****** **** ****** ** look ******* ******** ***** *****."
  • ******** ** **** **** ** ********** suite ** ******** *** **** **** in *** *********. ****** **** ***** companies **** **** **** ** *** away **** ********* ****** **** *** usually ******."
  • "********, *** ** *** **** ********* of ********* **** *********** *** ************ results."
  • "********, ****** ********. ***** ** * bit ***** (** *** **** *********)"
  • "******** **** ******* * **** ************* suite ** ****** *********."
  • "********, ** * ********* ******* * like *** ***********"
  • "**'** *** ***** ******* **** ********"
  • "******** *** ** *** ******** ************"

********'* ******** ** ********** ******* *****, unlike *** ****** ********* ** ***** rankings, ******** *** ********** ******* ************ and ********* ** ********** *********.

*********** ***** ********* ******.

*****

***** ******* ** **** *******, ***** scored ********* ** ****, *** ***** moderately ****** ****** ** ** *******. Favorable ********* ***** *****'* ***** ** features *** ****-***** ************:

  • "***** ** *** ******** ********* ********. We **** *** **** *** ********* are **** ***** ** ** ***'* have ** *** * ******** ****** to *** *** *********. **** *** fact **** *** *** *** ** to * ** * ****** ** a **** *** ** ***** *** correct ******** *** *** **** ****** based **** ***** *********."
  • "***** ** *** *** *** ******** analytics ***********. ** *** **** ******* they're ****** ************ *** ********"
  • "*****. ********* *** ** * ******** that *** **** ******* ******** ** Bosch *** *** ******* *** **** reliable **** **** *******."
  • "***** ***, **** ******** *** ***********"
  • "***** *** ******** ** *** **** device"
  • "***** **** ** *** **, ***** well."
  • "*****. **** ***** *****"

******* - **** ********?

** **** ******* ******** * ***** of * ********* ******** *** ** equal ****** ** ******** ******** *** a *** ******* *****. **** *** a *********** **** **** **** **** AgentVI ****** ***** **** ****, ***** was * **** **** *** ***** performance.

** *********** ********* **** ******** ******* * **** ***** ******* of *********** *********, *********** *** **** *** **-******* hardware.

**** ***** ********* *******

**** *** ****** *** ** *** top-cited ********* ** ***********:

Comments (6)

Was alarm.com's analytics considered in this article or is that in a different category? I put them on my house recently and have been pretty impressed.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Analytics are analytics. It was an open-ended question and integrators can reply with whatever they want.

To the extent that Alarm.com was not included, a big factor is certainly that Alarm.com is mostly residential focused and IPVM surveys primarily commercial integrators.

Agree
Disagree
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny

Interesting results thanks guys. What annoys me is that speaking generally about "video analytics" leads to answers mixing many different aspects that come from very different features: realtime vs forensics, LPR vs facial recognition vs perimeter etc... Could we say that Hanwa is better than Briefcam ? Definitely not as they are not providing the same stuff at all... If I can make a suggestion, that would be to separate these for the next issue ? Still I understand all this is a tough job and very time consuming !

Laurent

Agree: 4
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

realtime vs forensics, LPR vs facial recognition vs perimeter etc

From how people answer, it's pretty clear virtually no integrator thinks 'LPR' is 'video analytics'. I don't mean that as a criticism, just that the term 'video analytics' is widely accepted to be people / vehicle identification but not LPR or facial recognition.

In 2022, if adoption continues, we can easily run separate questions - what is your favorite LPR? what is your favorite facial recognition? etc.

We will see about realtime vs forensics but even that is blurred as Briefcam itself offers both now, as an example to your example.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Excited to see if we can get Dragonfruit AI into the mix for 2021. If you haven’t checked it out, you can at www.Dragonfruit.ai or reach out to me directly. The platform is a bit different than those on this year’s rankings. Happy 2021 all!

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Brian, this is the result of a survey, so it's up to integrators to select companies.

We do these favorite surveys every other year, so the next up is 2021.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny
Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts reporting, tutorials and software funded by subscriber's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.
Loading Related Reports