Favorite Video Analytics 2016

Author: John Honovich, Published on Feb 22, 2016

Video analytics are security professional's choice for the next big thing.

Despite that, our Video Analytics Market Guide and Favorites 2014 showed that adoption was still poor and only one vendor had significant support.

Now, in our 2016 guide, 150 integrators told us who their favorite analytics were and what they were using.

Inside this report, we examine integrator's choices and share color commentary on why integrators choose what they did.

***** ********* *********** ************'* ****** *** *** **** *** *****.

******* ****, ******** ********* ****** ***** *** ********* ********** **** ******** *** ***** **** *** **** *** ****** had *********** *******.

***, ** *** **** *****, *** *********** **** ** *** their ******** ********* **** *** **** **** **** *****.

****** **** ******, ** ******* **********'* ******* *** ***** ***** commentary ** *** *********** ****** **** **** ***.

[***************]

*******

** *** **** ****, ***** *********** ******** '****' *** ***** favorite ********* ********, ******* * ******* ******** ** **********. ** the ******** ****, ** ****** *** ******** *** * ***** and ***** ******* ** *******. * ****** ** ******* *** a ******* ** ***** ********* ****, *******, *****, ******** *** Sightlogix *** **** ****** *** *** ** ***.

** *** *** ***** **** (****,******* ***), ******** (******** ******* ** ****) ** *** ******** ***** ******** ****** ** *********** **** no ***** ******.

********

**** ******** *** ** ****** ********. ******** ****** ***** ********* R&D *** **** ******** ***, ******** *** ********* *** ********.

**** ***** ** ********** ** **** ******** ******** **** ******** votes *** ********* **** **** *** *** ******* ** ***. Indeed, ****** ****** / ***** *** *******, **** ******** ******** more ***** ** *** *** *** ********* ********. ** ********* this ** ******** *********** ***** ****** ** **** / ******** than ********.

**** *********** ***** ****** ******* **** ******** ***** *********:

  • "******** - **** *********** - **** ******"
  • "**** ********* ** ********. ** **** ******** * *** ***** and ***** **** ** ***"
  • "********. ******* ** *** ******* ** *** ******* *** *** support"
  • "******** - **********. ** **** ****** * ****** *** **** inconsistency. *** **** ** ****** ** *** ****/****** - ******** to *** **** ******* *** ***********"
  • "** **** *** **** ******* ***** *** ******/******** ********"
  • "********, ** *** ***** ******** ********* *** **** ***** ********'* package ** **** ** ***, **** ********* *** ***** ****"
  • "********. ********* ** *** ******* ******* *****, ******** *** *** most ****** *******"

* ****** ** *********** ***** **** **** ************ **** ******* to ********:

  • "******** (*** ***** **), ***** ****** *** ***, ***** ** for ******** ***"
  • "** ******* **** ******* ** ** ********* ************ ** *** Avigilon *********. ** *** ***** *********** *** ******* *** ***** analytics, **** ******** *** ******* *** ****** ******"
  • "** *** ** *** ******* *** *** ** ******** **** Avigilon *********."
  • "********, ** **** **** * ******* ****** *** *****, ***** product *** ***** *******"

******, ** ***** ******** ****** *******, **** ********* ****** ******** because ** *** ********:

  • "******** **** ****** * ***'* *** **, ***! ***** *** to *** * ******* *** ******. ****."
  • "********. ***** ** ** ******* ** ***** *** ***** ** is *** ***** ***** "*****" **** ********* **** *********** ********"
  • "** *** ******** *******"

The '****'

*** **** ** *** ************* ****** ***** *** ****** ******* number ** ***** ** **** ************ **** ***********.

****

**** *** *** **** *******, ****** **** **** ** **** and *** **********'* ********* **** *** ******* ********:

  • "** ***'* *** *** ** *'* *** **** *'* ********* with ***. **** ** ** ***** ****** ** ** * reputable ***** *** ****"
  • "***** **** *** **** ********* ******* ** ***** (** *** stretch *** ********** ** *********) ** *** ** **** ***** more ** * ***** *** **** ** ****** ***********"
  • "** *** ****'* **** ********* - ** ***'* *** *** aftermarket ********"
  • "****. ***** *** **** ******* *** **-****** *********"
  • "**** - *** * ** ****** ****"
  • "***** ***, *** *****-** **** **** ********* ** ****"

** *** *** ** ****, **** ******** ***** *** '******' video ********* ******* ******* ****** **** **** **** ****.

Agent **

***** ** *** ********** ****:

  • "***** **; **** ******** ** * *** *** ** *** worked *** **"
  • "***** ** ******* ** ***** *********** **** ****"
  • "******* *** * ****** *********** **** *** ********* ** *** working ****"
  • "***** ***** ************ ******* *** ************* **** ********* *********"
  • "* **** **** ** ******* ** ******* **..."
  • "*'* ********* ** ***** **. * *****'* **** * ****** Agent ** *******/******** ** *** **** ****"

*****

***** *** ********** ***** ** ****, **** *********** *********** *** analytics ***** ***** **** ***** *******:

  • "** *** ***** **** ********* ***** ** ***** ****** ** calibrate *** **** ****** ****** ********* ******* **** *** ***** motion ********* *********"
  • "*****. ******* *** ** ********** ** *** ******'*, ** **** for ******-**** *********, ***** ************ ********* *** ********** *****"
  • "***** **** ** ****** ********* * ****** ** ****** ********* at *** **** *** ********* *** ******* **** ****** ******* and **** ***** ******"
  • "*****, **** ***** ****-***** *** *******"
  • "***** ***** ***, ****** ********** ** ********** ***....**** *** *** only ****** **** ** *** ********* **** ******* *** ****** in *** ******* ***** *** ***** (** *** **********)"

********

******** *** * *** ********** **** ****** ****** ********** ************:

  • "* ****** **** *** ******** *******"
  • "******** ****** ******** ****, ** ***** ** ** **** ** consider ***** ****** ** ******* *** ***."
  • "********. *** ****** *** **** ******** **** ** **** ****** with. ******* **** **** **** **** ********** *** ********** *** the ********"
  • "***** ***, ******* ***** ****** ********** ** ***** ** **** spent ****** ** ****** *****."

****** *** ****** ** *** ****, ******** **** *** ** real **** *********, ******** ** ****** / **************.

**********

*******, ********** *** * **********, ****** **** ********** *** ****** in ***** ***********:

  • "********** - ** *** ********** ***** **** **** *** **** effective"
  • "********** *****-** *********. ****** = *********** *******"
  • "********** - ****** ***** ******"

********** **** ********** ********* ** ** *** *** ****** ***** than **** ******** ******** ********* ***** ***** **** ********, **** and *****.

Comments (5)

John,

As this was a survey of your constituency, it is the "favorite" and as such the only ones that get evaluated (or presented) are those that are "voted" on by said constituency.

I'd love it if the options could be expanded to include some outliers that are great choices, but don't lock you into a specific VMS product or camera manufacturer.

I've been using HPE Autonomy as of late, and despite some startup glitches and frustrations, it's beginning to show its mettle in both performance and agnosticism. It has it's own VMS (of course it does), but works and plays well with two or three other VMS brands.

The product offers multiple analytic products under one technology roof and is really beginning to take shape in the US market.

The product can handle LPR (multi-country, mixed plates, car / color identification), Facial (onboarded or not), Scene Analysis and detection (heuristic learning algorithm for aberrant behavior detection) and audio detection (using camera's built-in audio) to discover audio alerts and look for specific patterns or language spoken.

All this to say, I think that broadening the review (beyond Installers favorite - which usually leads directly to whomever is providing the largest margin) is a good thing.

Something to think about -

Thanks,

Ed

Ed, thanks for the feedback. Can we chat offline so we can hear a little more about your HP Autonomy experience? Autonomy is just not widely used so it's not surprising it would not show up here.

On this point:

"beyond Installers favorite - which usually leads directly to whomever is providing the largest margin"

I disagree here. For example, Axis is overwhelmingly the favorite camera and they provide poor margin. And VideoIQ/Avigilon has been the favorite three straight times, and in our testing, the reason for that is fairly clear. Of the analytics that don't cost a small fortune (e.g., IBM, HP Autonomy, etc.), VideoIQ/Avigilon has worked the best.

Who here has used people counting and what product(s) did you use?

Did it perform well and was it easy to set up?

Did you user have a preference for cloud based or something running inside their own network?

Any additional comments or insight are appreciated

Thanks

Maybe one should separate the video analytics into edge-based vs server-based or live detection vs post-event.

This would give a better comparison.

Looking at the responses, edge beats server by a wide margin and live detection beats post-event by a similar large margin.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

ISC East 2018 Mini-Show Final Report on Nov 16, 2018
This is our second (updated) and final show report from ISC East. ISC East, by its own admission, is not a national or international show, billed...
Beware Amazon Go Store Hype (Tested) on Nov 13, 2018
IPVM's trip to and testing of Amazon Go's San Francisco store shows a number of significant operational and economic issues that undermine the...
Magos Radar Company Profile on Nov 12, 2018
Magos America General Manager Yaron Zussman admits when he first came across Magos, he asked himself: "What's innovative about radar?" Be that as...
Genetec Privacy Protector Tested on Nov 12, 2018
Genetec has built Kiwi Security's Privacy Protector into Security Center, an analytic which anonymizes individuals in cameras' fields of view...
Video Surveillance Hard Drive Size Statistics 2018 on Nov 08, 2018
What is the most common hard drive size for video surveillance? 150+ integrators answered: What size hard drive do you most commonly use? What...
Axis 2N Intercom Tested on Nov 08, 2018
Axis expanded its video intercom business buying Czech-based 2N in 2016. Despite competing against owner Axis' intercoms, 2N recently registered as...
Kogniz Silicon Valley AI Startup Profile on Nov 07, 2018
Kogniz is a Silicon Valley company that aims to bring AI analytics to security and surveillance, centering on their own smart cameras: We spoke...
Dahua Dual Imager Dome Camera Tested (HDBW4231FN-E2-M) on Nov 07, 2018
Dahua has introduced a dual-imager dome model, the HDBW4231FN-E2-M, with two independently positionable sensors including integrated IR, not found...
Avigilon Opens Up Analytics And Cameras on Nov 06, 2018
Avigilon is opening up. The company historically famous for advocating its own end-to-end solutions and making it harder for 3rd parties to...
Favorite Video Surveillance Hard Drive Manufacturer 2018 on Nov 06, 2018
Who is the favorite hard drive for video surveillance use? 150+ integrators answered: What is your preferred brand/model of hard drive for...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Throughtek P2P/Cloud Solution Profile on Nov 15, 2018
Many IoT manufacturers either do not have the capabilities or the interest to develop their own cloud management software for their devices....
ASIS Offering Custom Research For Manufacturers on Nov 15, 2018
Manufacturers often want to know what industry people think about trends and, in particular, the segments and product they offer.  ASIS and its...
ISC East 2018 Mini-Show Report on Nov 15, 2018
ISC East, by its own admission, is not a national or international show, billed as the "Largest Annual Northeast U.S. Security...
Hikvision Silent on "Bad Architectural Practices" Cybersecurity Report on Nov 14, 2018
A 'significant vulnerability was found in Hikvision cameras' by VDOO, a startup cybersecurity specialist. Hikvision has fixed the specific...
French Government Threatens School with $1.7M Fine For “Excessive Video Surveillance” on Nov 14, 2018
The French government has notified a high-profile Paris coding academy that it risks a fine of up to 1.5 million euros (about $1.7m) if it...
Integrator Credit Card Alternative Divvy on Nov 13, 2018
Most security integrators are small businesses but large enough that they have various employees that need to be able to expense various charges as...
Directory of Video Intercoms on Nov 13, 2018
Video Intercoms, also known as Video Door-Phones or Video Entry Systems, have been growing in the past decade as more and more IP camera...
Beware Amazon Go Store Hype (Tested) on Nov 13, 2018
IPVM's trip to and testing of Amazon Go's San Francisco store shows a number of significant operational and economic issues that undermine the...
Magos Radar Company Profile on Nov 12, 2018
Magos America General Manager Yaron Zussman admits when he first came across Magos, he asked himself: "What's innovative about radar?" Be that as...
Genetec Privacy Protector Tested on Nov 12, 2018
Genetec has built Kiwi Security's Privacy Protector into Security Center, an analytic which anonymizes individuals in cameras' fields of view...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact