Favorite Video Analytics 2016

Author: John Honovich, Published on Feb 22, 2016

Video analytics are security professional's choice for the next big thing.

Despite that, our Video Analytics Market Guide and Favorites 2014 showed that adoption was still poor and only one vendor had significant support.

Now, in our 2016 guide, 150 integrators told us who their favorite analytics were and what they were using.

Inside this report, we examine integrator's choices and share color commentary on why integrators choose what they did.

***** ********* *********** ************'* ****** *** *** **** *** *****.

******* ****, ******** ********* ****** ***** *** ********* ********** **** ******** *** ***** **** *** **** *** ****** had *********** *******.

***, ** *** **** *****, *** *********** **** ** *** their ******** ********* **** *** **** **** **** *****.

****** **** ******, ** ******* **********'* ******* *** ***** ***** commentary ** *** *********** ****** **** **** ***.

[***************]

*******

** *** **** ****, ***** *********** ******** '****' *** ***** favorite ********* ********, ******* * ******* ******** ** **********. ** the ******** ****, ** ****** *** ******** *** * ***** and ***** ******* ** *******. * ****** ** ******* *** a ******* ** ***** ********* ****, *******, *****, ******** *** Sightlogix *** **** ****** *** *** ** ***.

** *** *** ***** **** (****,******* ***), ******** (******** ******* ** ****) ** *** ******** ***** ******** ****** ** *********** **** no ***** ******.

********

**** ******** *** ** ****** ********. ******** ****** ***** ********* R&D *** **** ******** ***, ******** *** ********* *** ********.

**** ***** ** ********** ** **** ******** ******** **** ******** votes *** ********* **** **** *** *** ******* ** ***. Indeed, ****** ****** / ***** *** *******, **** ******** ******** more ***** ** *** *** *** ********* ********. ** ********* this ** ******** *********** ***** ****** ** **** / ******** than ********.

**** *********** ***** ****** ******* **** ******** ***** *********:

  • "******** - **** *********** - **** ******"
  • "**** ********* ** ********. ** **** ******** * *** ***** and ***** **** ** ***"
  • "********. ******* ** *** ******* ** *** ******* *** *** support"
  • "******** - **********. ** **** ****** * ****** *** **** inconsistency. *** **** ** ****** ** *** ****/****** - ******** to *** **** ******* *** ***********"
  • "** **** *** **** ******* ***** *** ******/******** ********"
  • "********, ** *** ***** ******** ********* *** **** ***** ********'* package ** **** ** ***, **** ********* *** ***** ****"
  • "********. ********* ** *** ******* ******* *****, ******** *** *** most ****** *******"

* ****** ** *********** ***** **** **** ************ **** ******* to ********:

  • "******** (*** ***** **), ***** ****** *** ***, ***** ** for ******** ***"
  • "** ******* **** ******* ** ** ********* ************ ** *** Avigilon *********. ** *** ***** *********** *** ******* *** ***** analytics, **** ******** *** ******* *** ****** ******"
  • "** *** ** *** ******* *** *** ** ******** **** Avigilon *********."
  • "********, ** **** **** * ******* ****** *** *****, ***** product *** ***** *******"

******, ** ***** ******** ****** *******, **** ********* ****** ******** because ** *** ********:

  • "******** **** ****** * ***'* *** **, ***! ***** *** to *** * ******* *** ******. ****."
  • "********. ***** ** ** ******* ** ***** *** ***** ** is *** ***** ***** "*****" **** ********* **** *********** ********"
  • "** *** ******** *******"

The '****'

*** **** ** *** ************* ****** ***** *** ****** ******* number ** ***** ** **** ************ **** ***********.

****

**** *** *** **** *******, ****** **** **** ** **** and *** **********'* ********* **** *** ******* ********:

  • "** ***'* *** *** ** *'* *** **** *'* ********* with ***. **** ** ** ***** ****** ** ** * reputable ***** *** ****"
  • "***** **** *** **** ********* ******* ** ***** (** *** stretch *** ********** ** *********) ** *** ** **** ***** more ** * ***** *** **** ** ****** ***********"
  • "** *** ****'* **** ********* - ** ***'* *** *** aftermarket ********"
  • "****. ***** *** **** ******* *** **-****** *********"
  • "**** - *** * ** ****** ****"
  • "***** ***, *** *****-** **** **** ********* ** ****"

** *** *** ** ****, **** ******** ***** *** '******' video ********* ******* ******* ****** **** **** **** ****.

Agent **

***** ** *** ********** ****:

  • "***** **; **** ******** ** * *** *** ** *** worked *** **"
  • "***** ** ******* ** ***** *********** **** ****"
  • "******* *** * ****** *********** **** *** ********* ** *** working ****"
  • "***** ***** ************ ******* *** ************* **** ********* *********"
  • "* **** **** ** ******* ** ******* **..."
  • "*'* ********* ** ***** **. * *****'* **** * ****** Agent ** *******/******** ** *** **** ****"

*****

***** *** ********** ***** ** ****, **** *********** *********** *** analytics ***** ***** **** ***** *******:

  • "** *** ***** **** ********* ***** ** ***** ****** ** calibrate *** **** ****** ****** ********* ******* **** *** ***** motion ********* *********"
  • "*****. ******* *** ** ********** ** *** ******'*, ** **** for ******-**** *********, ***** ************ ********* *** ********** *****"
  • "***** **** ** ****** ********* * ****** ** ****** ********* at *** **** *** ********* *** ******* **** ****** ******* and **** ***** ******"
  • "*****, **** ***** ****-***** *** *******"
  • "***** ***** ***, ****** ********** ** ********** ***....**** *** *** only ****** **** ** *** ********* **** ******* *** ****** in *** ******* ***** *** ***** (** *** **********)"

********

******** *** * *** ********** **** ****** ****** ********** ************:

  • "* ****** **** *** ******** *******"
  • "******** ****** ******** ****, ** ***** ** ** **** ** consider ***** ****** ** ******* *** ***."
  • "********. *** ****** *** **** ******** **** ** **** ****** with. ******* **** **** **** **** ********** *** ********** *** the ********"
  • "***** ***, ******* ***** ****** ********** ** ***** ** **** spent ****** ** ****** *****."

****** *** ****** ** *** ****, ******** **** *** ** real **** *********, ******** ** ****** / **************.

**********

*******, ********** *** * **********, ****** **** ********** *** ****** in ***** ***********:

  • "********** - ** *** ********** ***** **** **** *** **** effective"
  • "********** *****-** *********. ****** = *********** *******"
  • "********** - ****** ***** ******"

********** **** ********** ********* ** ** *** *** ****** ***** than **** ******** ******** ********* ***** ***** **** ********, **** and *****.

Comments (5)

John,

As this was a survey of your constituency, it is the "favorite" and as such the only ones that get evaluated (or presented) are those that are "voted" on by said constituency.

I'd love it if the options could be expanded to include some outliers that are great choices, but don't lock you into a specific VMS product or camera manufacturer.

I've been using HPE Autonomy as of late, and despite some startup glitches and frustrations, it's beginning to show its mettle in both performance and agnosticism. It has it's own VMS (of course it does), but works and plays well with two or three other VMS brands.

The product offers multiple analytic products under one technology roof and is really beginning to take shape in the US market.

The product can handle LPR (multi-country, mixed plates, car / color identification), Facial (onboarded or not), Scene Analysis and detection (heuristic learning algorithm for aberrant behavior detection) and audio detection (using camera's built-in audio) to discover audio alerts and look for specific patterns or language spoken.

All this to say, I think that broadening the review (beyond Installers favorite - which usually leads directly to whomever is providing the largest margin) is a good thing.

Something to think about -

Thanks,

Ed

Ed, thanks for the feedback. Can we chat offline so we can hear a little more about your HP Autonomy experience? Autonomy is just not widely used so it's not surprising it would not show up here.

On this point:

"beyond Installers favorite - which usually leads directly to whomever is providing the largest margin"

I disagree here. For example, Axis is overwhelmingly the favorite camera and they provide poor margin. And VideoIQ/Avigilon has been the favorite three straight times, and in our testing, the reason for that is fairly clear. Of the analytics that don't cost a small fortune (e.g., IBM, HP Autonomy, etc.), VideoIQ/Avigilon has worked the best.

Who here has used people counting and what product(s) did you use?

Did it perform well and was it easy to set up?

Did you user have a preference for cloud based or something running inside their own network?

Any additional comments or insight are appreciated

Thanks

Maybe one should separate the video analytics into edge-based vs server-based or live detection vs post-event.

This would give a better comparison.

Looking at the responses, edge beats server by a wide margin and live detection beats post-event by a similar large margin.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Genetec Security Center 5.8 Tested on Mar 19, 2019
Genetec has released Version 5.8. This comes after a wait of more than a year that caused frustrations for many Genetec partners. Our previous...
Large US University End-User Video Surveillance Interview on Mar 18, 2019
Schools have become targets in modern days of active shooters and terrorist fears. The need for video and access security is high. Universities...
Hikvision Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 18, 2019
Hikvision favorability results declined significantly in IPVM's 2019 study of 200+ integrators. While in 2017 Hikvision's favorability was...
ONVIF Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 15, 2019
In the past decade, ONVIF has grown from a reaction to the outside Cisco-lead PSIA challenge, to being the de facto video surveillance standard...
City Physical Security Manager Interview on Mar 14, 2019
This physical security pro is the Physical Security Manager for the City of Calgary. He is a criminologist by training with an ASIS CPP credential....
Integrator Profitability Bonuses - Statistics on Mar 13, 2019
While winning projects typically gets the most attention, how profitable those jobs turn out to be is key to the long-term success of integrators....
Pelco GFC 4K Dome Camera Tested (IMP831-1ERS) on Mar 12, 2019
Pelco has finally released their first 4K IP camera, after years of competitors' releases. Is this move too late? Or is their new GFC Professional...
Network Optix Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 11, 2019
Network Optix is arguably the last new VMS. Founded in 2010, more than a decade after most client/server VMS offerings, the company has become a...
BCDVideo Expansion And Switch From HP To Dell Examined on Mar 11, 2019
BCDVideo says they have more than tripled revenue in the past 5 years and are continuing to grow, powered most recently by switching their lead...
Arcules Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 08, 2019
Arcules has amazing advantages. Tens of millions of funding from Canon. Unlimited access to Milestone's source code (see our test results). But...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Avigilon Launches 'Renewed Products Program' on Mar 19, 2019
There are lots of 'pre-owned' cars but pre-owned IP cameras? While such programs are common in other industries, in video surveillance, they are...
Hanwha Tax Evasion Probe, Camera Division Implicated on Mar 19, 2019
A Hanwha group subsidiary was raided as part of a tax evasion probe. While a Korean news media report listed the raided entity as 'Hanwha...
Genetec Security Center 5.8 Tested on Mar 19, 2019
Genetec has released Version 5.8. This comes after a wait of more than a year that caused frustrations for many Genetec partners. Our previous...
Retired Mercury President Returns As Open Options President on Mar 18, 2019
Open Options experienced major changes in 2018, including being acquired by ACRE and losing its President and General Manager, John Berman who...
Large US University End-User Video Surveillance Interview on Mar 18, 2019
Schools have become targets in modern days of active shooters and terrorist fears. The need for video and access security is high. Universities...
Hikvision Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 18, 2019
Hikvision favorability results declined significantly in IPVM's 2019 study of 200+ integrators. While in 2017 Hikvision's favorability was...
ONVIF Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 15, 2019
In the past decade, ONVIF has grown from a reaction to the outside Cisco-lead PSIA challenge, to being the de facto video surveillance standard...
Installation Course - Last Chance on Mar 14, 2019
This is the last chance to register for the March Installation course. This is a unique installation course in a market where little practical...
City Physical Security Manager Interview on Mar 14, 2019
This physical security pro is the Physical Security Manager for the City of Calgary. He is a criminologist by training with an ASIS CPP credential....
US Drafting Separate Rule for NDAA Dahua/Hikvision 'Blacklist' on Mar 14, 2019
The most debated provision of the NDAA ban of Dahua, Hikvision, Huawei, et al. is the so-called 'blacklist' provision which would ban any company...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact