Favorite Video Analytics 2016

Author: John Honovich, Published on Feb 22, 2016

Video analytics are security professional's choice for the next big thing.

Despite that, our Video Analytics Market Guide and Favorites 2014 showed that adoption was still poor and only one vendor had significant support.

Now, in our 2016 guide, 150 integrators told us who their favorite analytics were and what they were using.

Inside this report, we examine integrator's choices and share color commentary on why integrators choose what they did.

***** ********* *********** ************'* ****** *** *** **** *** *****.

******* ****, ******** ********* ****** ***** *** ********* ********** **** ******** *** ***** **** *** **** *** ****** had *********** *******.

***, ** *** **** *****, *** *********** **** ** *** their ******** ********* **** *** **** **** **** *****.

****** **** ******, ** ******* **********'* ******* *** ***** ***** commentary ** *** *********** ****** **** **** ***.

[***************]

*******

** *** **** ****, ***** *********** ******** '****' *** ***** favorite ********* ********, ******* * ******* ******** ** **********. ** the ******** ****, ** ****** *** ******** *** * ***** and ***** ******* ** *******. * ****** ** ******* *** a ******* ** ***** ********* ****, *******, *****, ******** *** Sightlogix *** **** ****** *** *** ** ***.

** *** *** ***** **** (****,******* ***), ******** (******** ******* ** ****) ** *** ******** ***** ******** ****** ** *********** **** no ***** ******.

********

**** ******** *** ** ****** ********. ******** ****** ***** ********* R&D *** **** ******** ***, ******** *** ********* *** ********.

**** ***** ** ********** ** **** ******** ******** **** ******** votes *** ********* **** **** *** *** ******* ** ***. Indeed, ****** ****** / ***** *** *******, **** ******** ******** more ***** ** *** *** *** ********* ********. ** ********* this ** ******** *********** ***** ****** ** **** / ******** than ********.

**** *********** ***** ****** ******* **** ******** ***** *********:

  • "******** - **** *********** - **** ******"
  • "**** ********* ** ********. ** **** ******** * *** ***** and ***** **** ** ***"
  • "********. ******* ** *** ******* ** *** ******* *** *** support"
  • "******** - **********. ** **** ****** * ****** *** **** inconsistency. *** **** ** ****** ** *** ****/****** - ******** to *** **** ******* *** ***********"
  • "** **** *** **** ******* ***** *** ******/******** ********"
  • "********, ** *** ***** ******** ********* *** **** ***** ********'* package ** **** ** ***, **** ********* *** ***** ****"
  • "********. ********* ** *** ******* ******* *****, ******** *** *** most ****** *******"

* ****** ** *********** ***** **** **** ************ **** ******* to ********:

  • "******** (*** ***** **), ***** ****** *** ***, ***** ** for ******** ***"
  • "** ******* **** ******* ** ** ********* ************ ** *** Avigilon *********. ** *** ***** *********** *** ******* *** ***** analytics, **** ******** *** ******* *** ****** ******"
  • "** *** ** *** ******* *** *** ** ******** **** Avigilon *********."
  • "********, ** **** **** * ******* ****** *** *****, ***** product *** ***** *******"

******, ** ***** ******** ****** *******, **** ********* ****** ******** because ** *** ********:

  • "******** **** ****** * ***'* *** **, ***! ***** *** to *** * ******* *** ******. ****."
  • "********. ***** ** ** ******* ** ***** *** ***** ** is *** ***** ***** "*****" **** ********* **** *********** ********"
  • "** *** ******** *******"

The '****'

*** **** ** *** ************* ****** ***** *** ****** ******* number ** ***** ** **** ************ **** ***********.

****

**** *** *** **** *******, ****** **** **** ** **** and *** **********'* ********* **** *** ******* ********:

  • "** ***'* *** *** ** *'* *** **** *'* ********* with ***. **** ** ** ***** ****** ** ** * reputable ***** *** ****"
  • "***** **** *** **** ********* ******* ** ***** (** *** stretch *** ********** ** *********) ** *** ** **** ***** more ** * ***** *** **** ** ****** ***********"
  • "** *** ****'* **** ********* - ** ***'* *** *** aftermarket ********"
  • "****. ***** *** **** ******* *** **-****** *********"
  • "**** - *** * ** ****** ****"
  • "***** ***, *** *****-** **** **** ********* ** ****"

** *** *** ** ****, **** ******** ***** *** '******' video ********* ******* ******* ****** **** **** **** ****.

Agent **

***** ** *** ********** ****:

  • "***** **; **** ******** ** * *** *** ** *** worked *** **"
  • "***** ** ******* ** ***** *********** **** ****"
  • "******* *** * ****** *********** **** *** ********* ** *** working ****"
  • "***** ***** ************ ******* *** ************* **** ********* *********"
  • "* **** **** ** ******* ** ******* **..."
  • "*'* ********* ** ***** **. * *****'* **** * ****** Agent ** *******/******** ** *** **** ****"

*****

***** *** ********** ***** ** ****, **** *********** *********** *** analytics ***** ***** **** ***** *******:

  • "** *** ***** **** ********* ***** ** ***** ****** ** calibrate *** **** ****** ****** ********* ******* **** *** ***** motion ********* *********"
  • "*****. ******* *** ** ********** ** *** ******'*, ** **** for ******-**** *********, ***** ************ ********* *** ********** *****"
  • "***** **** ** ****** ********* * ****** ** ****** ********* at *** **** *** ********* *** ******* **** ****** ******* and **** ***** ******"
  • "*****, **** ***** ****-***** *** *******"
  • "***** ***** ***, ****** ********** ** ********** ***....**** *** *** only ****** **** ** *** ********* **** ******* *** ****** in *** ******* ***** *** ***** (** *** **********)"

********

******** *** * *** ********** **** ****** ****** ********** ************:

  • "* ****** **** *** ******** *******"
  • "******** ****** ******** ****, ** ***** ** ** **** ** consider ***** ****** ** ******* *** ***."
  • "********. *** ****** *** **** ******** **** ** **** ****** with. ******* **** **** **** **** ********** *** ********** *** the ********"
  • "***** ***, ******* ***** ****** ********** ** ***** ** **** spent ****** ** ****** *****."

****** *** ****** ** *** ****, ******** **** *** ** real **** *********, ******** ** ****** / **************.

**********

*******, ********** *** * **********, ****** **** ********** *** ****** in ***** ***********:

  • "********** - ** *** ********** ***** **** **** *** **** effective"
  • "********** *****-** *********. ****** = *********** *******"
  • "********** - ****** ***** ******"

********** **** ********** ********* ** ** *** *** ****** ***** than **** ******** ******** ********* ***** ***** **** ********, **** and *****.

Comments (5)

John,

As this was a survey of your constituency, it is the "favorite" and as such the only ones that get evaluated (or presented) are those that are "voted" on by said constituency.

I'd love it if the options could be expanded to include some outliers that are great choices, but don't lock you into a specific VMS product or camera manufacturer.

I've been using HPE Autonomy as of late, and despite some startup glitches and frustrations, it's beginning to show its mettle in both performance and agnosticism. It has it's own VMS (of course it does), but works and plays well with two or three other VMS brands.

The product offers multiple analytic products under one technology roof and is really beginning to take shape in the US market.

The product can handle LPR (multi-country, mixed plates, car / color identification), Facial (onboarded or not), Scene Analysis and detection (heuristic learning algorithm for aberrant behavior detection) and audio detection (using camera's built-in audio) to discover audio alerts and look for specific patterns or language spoken.

All this to say, I think that broadening the review (beyond Installers favorite - which usually leads directly to whomever is providing the largest margin) is a good thing.

Something to think about -

Thanks,

Ed

Ed, thanks for the feedback. Can we chat offline so we can hear a little more about your HP Autonomy experience? Autonomy is just not widely used so it's not surprising it would not show up here.

On this point:

"beyond Installers favorite - which usually leads directly to whomever is providing the largest margin"

I disagree here. For example, Axis is overwhelmingly the favorite camera and they provide poor margin. And VideoIQ/Avigilon has been the favorite three straight times, and in our testing, the reason for that is fairly clear. Of the analytics that don't cost a small fortune (e.g., IBM, HP Autonomy, etc.), VideoIQ/Avigilon has worked the best.

Who here has used people counting and what product(s) did you use?

Did it perform well and was it easy to set up?

Did you user have a preference for cloud based or something running inside their own network?

Any additional comments or insight are appreciated

Thanks

Maybe one should separate the video analytics into edge-based vs server-based or live detection vs post-event.

This would give a better comparison.

Looking at the responses, edge beats server by a wide margin and live detection beats post-event by a similar large margin.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have not only been big buzzwords over the past decade, but they have also become core features of video...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...
Pelco Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 11, 2019
Pelco had a significant favorability problem amongst integrators in our previous study (see 2016 Pelco results). Now, in the first edition of our...
NTP / Network Time Guide For Video Surveillance on Jan 10, 2019
Inaccurate time can lead to missing or inadmissible video, yet this topic is often overlooked, with cameras and servers left defaulted,...
Managed Video Services UL 827B Examined on Jan 09, 2019
Historically, UL listings for central stations have been important, with UL 827 having widespread support. However, few central stations have...
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial on Jan 08, 2019
H.265 support improved significantly in 2018, with H.265 camera/VMS compatibility increased compared to only a year ago, and most manufacturers...
IPVM Best New Products 2019 Opened - 70+ Entrants on Jan 07, 2019
The inaugural IPVM Best New Product Awards has been opened - the industry's first and only program where the awards are not pay-to-play and the...

Most Recent Industry Reports

The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have not only been big buzzwords over the past decade, but they have also become core features of video...
NYPD Refutes False SCMP Hikvision Story on Jan 18, 2019
The NYPD has refuted the SCMP Hikvision story, the Voice of America has reported. On January 11, 2018, the SCMP alleged that the NYPD was using...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Access Control Records Maintenance Guide on Jan 16, 2019
Weeding out old entries, turning off unused credentials, and updating who carries which credentials is as important as to maintaining security as...
UK Fines Security Firms For Illegal Direct Marketing on Jan 16, 2019
Two UK security firms have paid over $200,000 in fines for illegally making hundreds of thousands of calls to people registered on a government...
Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact