John,
We love the caluclator and consult it frequently. Two questions. I appologize if these have been posted and answered previously, I did scan the posts to try and check first.
As one of the things we use the calculator for is setting image qaulity expectations for particular camera models and HAoV -
1. Would it be accurate to assume that the sample images provided in the calculator represent best-case in terms of low compression/high-quality settings?
2. To my eye, it appears that the sample images provided by the calcualtor have a greater level of detail and legibility than comparable pixel/ft images from your "PPF Test" Article from Apr 04, 2010. Do you see the same thing, and if so, would you comment on which you think might represent the more accurate sample image? Or - would you say they are both valid and simply represent the possible range of actual video quality outcomes, given the variety of factors always contribute?