Average ***** **** ********* ** **
** ****, *** ******* ***** **** used *** ~*****, ** *** ********* below ***** ****** ** *** ******** 5ps ** ***** ***** **% *** over *****:

Frame **** ******* ** * ******
** **** *** ******* ***** *** only ****, ********** ** ***** ** 2016, *** ******* ** *** ***** in ****. ***** ** * ********** comparison ** **** ****.

4 *******
*********** ************ ***** **** **** ******* that **** *** ************ ****** ***** rates ** **** **** ** ***** past:
- ********** *******
- *.***
- ***** ******
- ******** ***** ********* ***** ****
*** ******* ***** ******** **** *********** and ****** ****** ********** *** ******* that ***** **** *** *********.
Integrator ********
*** ********* ***** **** ******** ** integrators ********* *** *** ********* ***** rate *******. **** **** **** ** the ***+ ********* ** ******** ******** mention **** **** *** ** *** four *** ******* *** ********* ***** rate:
- "** ***, ***** ****** *** "*******" while *** *** *** ** *** storage. ****** ***** ** *.*** *****. But **** *.***+ **** **** **'* **** fps. ****** **** ************ ******* *** customized *** *** *** ********* *****."
- "** ***... **** *** ******** *********** cost *** ******* *** *** *** of ********* (**** *******) ** **** that ** *** ******** ** ****** for * *** *** ******, **** should *** ** *** *** ** what *** ****** *** ** *** not ***** ** ** * ** 15 ***."
- "** ***. ******* ** *****. ****** I'm ** * ***** ****** ***** it ******* * ******* ** ***** the ****** ** ******* *** * huge ****** ** *********, * ****** prefer **** ***** ****. * **** my ********* *** *** ****** ***** a ****** ****** ** ****** *** video, *** *** ***'* **** ** video *** ****'* ******* **** *** really **** **."
- "** *** ** *** ** ** use *.*** *** ****** ** **** drive *******."
- "*** ******** ******* ***** **** ***** to ** ***** ** ** **** 10, ******** *** ** ****** ****** storage ****** ****** *** ****** ********* due ** *.*** *********** ** ******* solutions."
- "********** *****, ***** / ***** ** to ** ***, * **** * continuous **** ****** ** ***, ** the ****** *** * ***** *****, when ******** ** ****** *** ****, then **** ***** ** *****, **** in **** ** *** ***** ** earlier *****"
- "* *** **-* **** ******* ** 20-30 ****** ****** ** ******** ******. We ** **** ** ******** ***** but **** ** **** *** **** quality ******* **** ** ***** ***** places **** ***** ********."
Why *****?
*********** ******** ***** ******** ***** ** as * **** *******:
- "********* ***** ******* * ***** ** is * ********** ********** ******* ******* space *** ***** ******."
- "***** ** *** ******* ******* ** give ** **** ****** ****** *** investigating ** ***** *** *** ****** of ***** ******."
- "**. **'* * **** ****** ** the **** *** *******."
- "*****, ** **** **** ******* ******* compromising *** **** ***** ******."
- "******** ** ******. ***** **** * good ******* *** **** ************. ********* higher ***** ***** ***** ***** ** more ******."
- "**. ** ****** *** ***** ******* between ******* ****/********* *** *** ********. For **** ************ ** ***** ** the ***** *** **** **** **** and **** ********* *** ******** ** multiple ******"
- "***** ** ** * ***** ****** between *********/******* ************ *** ******* ** view ***** **** ** **** ** car ***** ***."
- "**, **** ******* *** ***** **** capture ****"
- "** *** - ***** ** ** good ******* ******* ****** ***** *** transmission *****."
- "** *** ** ******** * **** picture, ***** ** ******* & ********* high *** ******* *** ** ***"
- "**** ** **** *** ****** ** 15 **** ********* **** **** ******* image"
- "**. **** ******* ******* ******* *** bandwidth/storage."
- "**. ***** ** ** * **** balance ******* ********/****** *********** *** *********."
Improved *ompression **********
** ****, *** **** ** *** last ***** **** ******, **** **************** *** ***** ***** ****** ** our **** ***** ***** ********* ** **** ** ******* **** 71% ** ********* **** **** ***** or ****** *** ***** ******.**** ****** ** **** ******* ** to **%*** *** **% ** ***** ******* that **** *** ***** ****** ** 90-100% ** *** ****. **** ***** has ****** ********* ** ******** ***** 2017.
***** ********* ********** ******** *** ******** ********* when ***** ****** ***** ***** ** a **** ********* ** ***** ****** is * ******* *-***** ********. ** the **** *-***** ********* **** ***** but *** ** ******* *** '*****' enough ** ********* *** ***** ** motion *** ** ****** *** *-***** interval ****** *** ******, ******** **** frame ***** ** **** ***** *********.*** *** ***** ****** ***** *** more.
************, ** **** ****** *** *** support *** *.*** *** ******* ** availability, ******* ** **** *.*** ** available ** **** ***** *** ********* and **** ****** ****** ** ********* in*** *.*** ********
Lower **** *******
****** ** ******* **** **** ******** dropping *** **** * ******, **** the ********* ** *** ******** ***** crisis ** ****. ******* ****** ******** to ****; *.*. ** ****** *** drive ** ~$*** *****, ***** ** 2016 ** **** ~$***.
Scenario-Based ***** ****
******* *********** ****** *** ***** **** based ** *** ********, *.*. **** view, *********, ***** / *****. ***** this *** **** ** ******* ** many ******* *** ***** **** ************* are ********* **** ** * ******** feature, **** ** *** **** ******* and ****. *** ** *** ******** availability ** ** ***** **** **** now **** ** ****.
Frame **** **************
***** ***** ** *** *** ******* in ****, ***** *** **** ***** reasons ** ******** ************ ***** ***** rates. * *** *********** ***** **** they **** *** ********** ******** ***** mandate *** ***** ****. ******* **** want ** ** **** * ****** frame **** ** ****** ******, ** would **** ******** ************, *** ***** fast ****** ************.
Change ** **** *******
**** ** ******** *** *********** ******* frame **** **** ***** ** *****. This **** ***** *** **** ******* to ******** ** **** ******* **** our ******* ****** ****** **** ***** the **** *********.
Comments (4)
Undisclosed End User #1
Great study! From an end user perspective after bandwidth and storage considerations is the FPS impact on client machine CPU performance. The limitation on FPS had been largely relegated to the upper limits of the live view display CPU. I can see where the positive trends such as compression and dynamic FPS (or equivalents) helps considerably in addition to improvements in client PC's. Taking all three into consideration it stands to reasons this trend will likely continue and maybe dramatically so in the next decade.
Create New Topic
Undisclosed #2
From another end user perspective, I agree with the integrator feedback comment, "you can't make up video you didn't capture when you really need it." When I have the footage that is requested, it reinforces the overall return on investments. (including my IPVM membership)
71 cameras and the average is 21 fps. High is 30, low is 3. 90% H.264. 4K down to D1 via converter, 60% 1080P.
Create New Topic
Undisclosed Integrator #3
Can someone explain to me what is a scenario-based frame rate setting? Also how to implement it? A bit confused.
Create New Topic