Pressure Mounts Against Dahua and Hikvision Xinjiang BusinessBy Charles Rollet, Published Nov 19, 2018, 11:08am EST
Pressure is mounting against Hikvision, Dahua, and other companies operating in Xinjiang as an international outcry brews against the Chinese government’s campaign of mass detentions and surveillance in the region.
In this note, we cover a series of recent developments:
- A new US Congress bill on Xinjiang
- Hikvision’s Western investors worried about Xinjiang sanctions
- A major US think tank suggests a corporate boycott
- An activist organization calling for sanctions
- A Congressional committee urging increased scrutiny of China supply chains and Xinjiang abuses
- A Financial Times report on how Xinjiang sanctions could "cripple" Hikvision
Taken as a whole, the various moves spell serious trouble for any company making money off Xinjiang’s booming security sector in the form of sanctions, boycotts, and activist campaigns.
The Trump administration is currently considering sanctions against Hikvision and Dahua due to their activities in Xinjiang; if passed, these could end all their US activities and threaten their global supply chains. (Trump Administration Considering Sanctions Against Dahua and Hikvision).
The toughness of the sanctions reflects the seriousness of the situation in Xinjiang, where China is accused of detaining up to one million Muslim civilians, chiefly members of the Uyghur minority, and building up a “21st century police state” thanks to advanced surveillance technology.
Hikvision and Dahua are deeply involved in Xinjiang. IPVM revealed the firms have won $1.2 billion dollars in huge surveillance projects there since 2016. Two of those projects, both won by Hikvision, mandate advanced camera systems for re-education camps and hundreds of mosques.
Xinjiang Bill Introduced to Congress
The bill, which condemns “pervasive, high-tech surveillance across the region” but does not mention Hikvision and Dahua by name, includes provisions that would nevertheless affect Chinese and other companies profiting off surveillance in Xinjiang, in particular:
- The drafting of a US government report which lists "all Chinese companies involved in the construction or operation of the ‘political education’ camps, or the provision or operation of surveillance technology or operations, across Xinjiang."
- The establishment of a “United States Special Coordinator for Xinjiang” who will coordinate a response to "the deployment of technologically advanced surveillance and police detection methods" in Xinjiang, including possible sanctions
- “United States companies and individuals selling goods or services or otherwise operating in Xinjiang should take steps, including in any public or financial filings, to publicly assert that their commercial activities are not contributing to human rights violations in Xinjiang or elsewhere in China"
If passed, this bill could eventually lead to sanctions against Hikvision and Dahua by highlighting their role building up Xinjiang’s system of surveillance and detention.
An official US government report detailing their role in Xinjiang could pave the way for a sanctions announcement, which come with no warning and are impossible to appeal.
Hikvision Investors Worried About Xinjiang
Another sign of mounting pressure is from The Economist’s Asia economics editor Simon Rabinovitch that “pressure to divest is real, and it's mounting.”
On Thursday, Rabinovitch tweeted that he met a “group of managers from large Western institutional investors” which own Hikvision shares through index funds. Rabinovitch said the investors were “worried” because of “possible US sanctions against Hikvision for its role in Xinjiang” and met with the company.
Hikvision reportedly claimed that they “only make products” and "can't control what customers do", a line that one investor said “no longer works in gun debates in the US and it’s not going to work for state surveillance in China.”
Hikvision's claim that it is only selling cameras in Xinjiang is false. Hikvision is deeply involved in designing, building, and even operating the Xinjiang projects it has won. For example, the bidding contract for Hikvision's $53 million facial recognition project in Pishan county - which includes surveillance for mosques and a re-education camp - will see Hikvision "design-finance-build-operate" the project for 21 years before turning it over fully to Chinese authorities.
Western investors including JPMorgan, Fidelity, Vanguard, and Deutsche Bank have all reported holding Hikvision shares in their portfolios this year. Hikvision is a popular stock with foreign investors, particularly after it was included in the widely-followed MSCI Emerging Market Index.
Think Tank Floats Corporate Boycott
The CSIS, a major DC-based “defense and security” think tank, published an opinion piece from one of its experts, Amy K. Lehr, which called for the Trump administration to develop strategies to tackle "China’s use of technology for repression" in Xinjiang, including sanctions against Chinese companies:
This is a reference to the Treasury Department sanctions IPVM previously covered.
Lehr also called for a corporate boycott of companies involved in Xinjiang:
“As a starting point, purportedly responsible companies should voluntarily agree not to purchase or invest in such technology or collaborate with the surveillance companies clearly implicated in the Xinjiang violations," she wrote.
Uyghur Activists Call for Sanctions on Surveillance Companies
One of the 8 provisions it advocated was that “democratic governments” worldwide:
Impose sanctions on Chinese and international companies complicit in this Crime, including the equipment and technology used in the detention centers and the total-surveillance apparatus throughout the Uyghur Region.
US Congressional Commission Calls Out Xinjiang
The US-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC), has called out the use of technology in Xinjiang in its annual report to Congress. The USCC is a congressional commission that advises the US Congress on China.
In its report, the USCC said that “cutting-edge technology enables the Chinese government’s repression campaign” in Xinjiang.
It called for the State Department to prepare a report to Congress which, among other things, highlights “China’s attempts to suppress information about and misrepresent reporting of its human rights abuses of Uyghurs in Xinjiang.”
The USCC also called for stepped-up examinations of Chinese supply chains, including those of “IoT devices.”
It recommended that the White House Office of Management and Budget “prepare an annual report to Congress to ensure supply chain vulnerabilities from China are adequately addressed.”
Overall, the report indicated a toughening attitude from the US towards China.
"A consensus has emerged that the U.S. must pursue a more robust approach to protect its economic and security interests in view of Xi Jinping and China’s hostility to economic and political liberalization,” USCC Chairman Robin Cleveland said.
Unwanted Attention from FT
The threat of Xinjiang-related sanctions on Hikvision was the focus of a recent report from the Financial Times, the UK's leading business newspaper.
The FT said Xinjiang sanctions could "cripple" Hikvision, noting its reliance on US-made components such as CPUs and GPUs from Intel and Nvidia and storage equipment from Seagate. (Ambarella, a major Hikvision chip supplier, told the FT it was registered in the Cayman Islands, implying it would not be affected by sanctions.)
The FT article was skeptical of Hikvision's ability to source advanced components domestically, noting that "the gap between Chinese capabilities in CPU and GPU design and manufacture has allowed foreign suppliers to remain dominant".
The FT ended its article by saying that the Chinese government is now a liability for Hikvision. "State support — once a guarantor of commercial success — has now become a stumbling block for the ambitious surveillance company."
Xinjiang Pressure Likely To Increase
All these separate developments show that corporations involved in Xinjiang are already facing calls for sanctions, boycotts, and divestment, along with the unwanted media attention that results from such initiatives. With the Chinese government denying any issues in Xinjiang, such pressure is only likely to increase.
4 reports cite this report:
Back to Top