*******, ******* **** ** integrators ****** ** ***** use ***** *********, ***** is * ***** **** percentage *********** ***** *********** all ****** ** ******* and *****. ******, **** 1 ** * ***** deploy ***** *********, ** shown ** *** ***** below:
*******, ** *** ******** side, ***** ** *******. While ***** *** **** to **** ******* **** to ****, * ******* jump ** ***** ** the *** **** ******* compared ** ******** ****:
Skepticism ** ********* *******
****** ********* **** **** in **** ***** ********* are *** **** ******** unless *** ******** ************ asks *** **** **** of ** ******* ** feature. **** *** * few ************ ****:
- "* ***'* ***** **** are ***** *** ***** time. *** **** ********* that ****** *** ******** of ****."
- "** ** ****** ** the ***** ** *** RFP"
- "********* **** *** *** a ****, *** * do *** *** *** benefit"
- "*** ***** ***, *********, not ************, ***** ** resources ** **** *** support *** *** *********"
- "***'* ***** ** ***** well ****** ***"
******* ** *** ***** of ********* *** **** bringing ** *** *********** of ***** ***** *********, several ********* ***** ******* common ********* **** *****: cost *** ***** *****.
- "**** ******** **** ********* by ******** ** ** bid *****. ***** *** unreliable ** ****** *** typical ***** ************."
- "**** ** ****. ****** detection *** *** ********** usually **** *** ****."
- "***** - ** *** client ******* ** *** for **."
- "**** ** ***** ****** and ********** ** *** up. **** ******* ***** use **** ** ******* them. *** **** ********* they ******* **** **** to ******* **** *** to ***** ****** *** notifications."
Poor *********** ** ***** *** ***********
***** ********* **** ************* been ****** ** ******, both ** ***** ** the ***** ***** *** the ********* ********** (** the **** ** **** expensive ******* **** ******** analytics, ********* ******** ** processors, ** ********-***** ********), in ***** ** ***** and ************* **** *** the ********** ** ********, and **** *********** ** the **** ** ******** excessive ******* ** ***** alarms. ** ***** *** analytics ** ** ***** worthwhile, ***** ***** ** be * ***** **** savings ** ******* *******. We ******** ******* ********* that **** ** ******** that *** **** ********** deployments *** **** ** some **** ** ********* scenario. ** ***** ***** the ********* *** **** as * **** ** an ******** ******* *****, alerting **-**** ** ****** guards ** **** ****.
***** *** ******** ******, the ****** ***** ** be ********, **** ***** alarms **** ** * minimum ** ***** *** system ***** ******** ** ignored. ******** ** **** anti-analytics ********* ***** ***** lines ********:
- "**** ** ***** ****** and ********** ** *** up. **** ******* ***** use **** ** ******* them. *** **** ********* they ******* **** **** to ******* **** *** to ***** ****** *** notifications."
- "******* ** *** **** of ******** *** ***** of *** ******. ********* infrastructure *** ************ ** limitations ** ****. *********** of ********** *** ***** alarms."
- "**** ***** ************ *** accuracy ** ******** ******. if *** **** ** too *********** *** ******** a *** ** ***** positives, ** ** *** recommend ***** *********, *******, do **** ********* ****** anomaly ************** ********."
- "** *** ** ***** video ********, ******* ** lots ** ***** ********."
- "*** *** ****** ***** Poor *********** ** ********* in *** ******* **** we *** (****)"
There *** ******* ******* ******
** *** *********** *** be ********, ****** ** product ********* ** ** ensuring *** ***** *** expectations ** *** ******** are ***** ********** ***** are ******* ******** ** integrators ********* ********* ********* and ****** ******* **** video ********* ** *******. We ******** ******* *********** responses **** **** ******* in ********** *** *****.
- "************ ** *** **** cost *** ***********/********. ** see ********* ********* ********* more ********* ** ****** testing *** ****** * more ******/******** ******."
- "** ****** **** *** them, ** *** *** cost ** * ****** with ***** ** ******** or * ***** ***** analytics ****** ** ********* in *** ***."
- "**** **** *****'* *** exiting. ******* ******** ***** (server *****, ****** *****, parts ** **** *****, main ***** ***** ***** hours. ******** ***** ***** are ********** **** ********* or ****** ******* ******. Also ** *********** ** fence ********* *******."
- "** *** ********* ** part ** *** ******* central ******* ********** ********"
- "***** ** ** ***** personnel (***** ** *******) of ********* **** ** predetermined ** *** **** of ***** ********** ** intervention."
- "******** **** *** ****** after ***** ** ** non-staffed *****."
*** ********* ***** **** up **** *** **** perfectly:"******** ******** *** ****** manpower" **** ******** ***********, ********* can **** * ***** cost ******* ** ******** applications.
Additional ********** ************ *****
***** *** **** ****** usage ***** ** ******* around ********* ********** **** deployments, ***** *** ********** applications, **** ** ****** counting (******** ******** ** as * **** ** "Business ************"), ******* ***** recognition, *** ************ *** forensic ****** ** *****. In **** ***** *********** see ***** **** ** being "*****" ******* *** direct *********** ** *** system, ********** ** *** form ** ***** ******, is **** ******* ** detrimental ** *** ********* operation.
- "***** ********* ***** *** where **** **** * years ***. * ***** analytics ** * ******** tool **** ******** **** Briefcam ** **-****** **** Agent ** *** **** viable. **** ********** *** typical ***** ****** *** receive **** **** ********* and ****** * ******** to ******* ***** ******** video *** **** **** just ************. **** ***** said, ***** ** * significant **** ********** **** many ********* *** **** customers **** **** **** to *******."
- "******* **** ******** ***** are. ** ***** ****** counting ** ***."
***** ** ********* *** storage ******* ** **** a *** ***** **** we *****'* **** ** previous *********:
- "******** ******. **** ********* for ****** ** ******* requirements ******** ** ****** motion ***** *********."
- "** ***** ***** ***** analytics **'* **** ** our ******** ******** *** reduction *** ********* *** storage *** ********* ** the ******* ****** *****."
- "******** **'* * ***** as ** ***** ******* amounts ** ******* ***** not ****** *** ******** constantly."
- "** ****** ***** ********* because **** **** ** can ****** *** ******* capacity, *****-******** ******* *** storing ** *** **** video ****, ***** *********"
- "******* **** * **** year *******: *** ******* records ** ** ** hours/day. ***** *********, ********* decreases ** * ** 4 *****."
***** ******* ********* ** certainly * ***** *********** for *********, ** ** a ******** ****** ************* given **** ** *** hype ********* ************* **** promoted **** *** *****. Newer *********** ******* ********* ****** ** *.*** (*.*** ** ******* ****** vs *.***) *** ********* *********' ******* in ******* *********.
Analytics ********** ** *******
**** *********** *** ********** ********* analytics, *********** ****** ****** in ***** *** ***********:
- "************, **'* **** ****** customer ******, ***** *** been ***. ********, **'** begun * ****** **** into ***** ********* ******* so **** *** *******, including *** **** ******** players, *** ***** ************ are ******** **** ****** at **** ***** ***** points."
- "***** ******, ** ***** it ** *** *** the ******** *** *** benefit. *** ***** **** come **** ** **** (especially *** ******** *******) that ** *****'* **** sense ** **** *** it ** *** ***** process. **** **** * few *******, *** **** try ** ***. ***** they **** **, ***** not...at ***** **** ****'* have ** *** ***** for **."
- "**** ********* ********* ********* we ******* ** ** our ********. *********, ** costs ** *** ********* although *'** **** * Chinese ************ ********* ********* with *** **** *******. Adaptive ******** ********* **** to **** ******. ** see ********* ********** **** in ***** ***** *** when ** ***** ** implementation **** ***'* **** to ****** **** ***** analytics ** **** ** be **** * *********** rather **** **** ****."
Manufacturers Need ** ** ******
**** *********** ***** **** manufacturers *** *********** *** unclear ************:
- "** *** ** ***** them ****** ******* ** unrealistic ******** ************ *** also ******* ** *** administrative ******** **** *** larger *********."
- "*** ****** ** ****** residential *** ***** ********. Although **** ***** ********* can ** **** ** this ****** ** **** not *** *** ******** to ****** ** ** make ******** *** *****-*******."
- "*'** **** **** *********** demos *** *** **** client **** *** *** been ****** *** *********. And ****** * **** not **** ******** **** I ***** ********* ** having ***** ** ** core ****** ****. ****** unrealistic ** ****** ************ most ** *** ********* have *** **** ********. If ** *** **** active *********/***** ***** ********* I ***** *** **** changing."
*******, ********* *** ***** far **** * "**********" product, ****** **** *********** have ***** ******* **** a ******* *** ** manufacturers ** ** ******** applications. ** ****** ********* to ******** ** **** challenges **** *********** *** meeting ************ ** * broad *****, *** *********** that *** ************ ****** proficient ** ******* ********* products *** *** ************ may **** ********** * head ***** *** * competitive **** **** ***** competition.
Comments (9)
Undisclosed #1
For the purposes of the survey, is simple 'record on motion' considered an analytic?
Create New Topic
Sagy Amit
The tragedy of Video Analytics mainstream adoption is the fact that every single company that had real potential with quality products, and high investment in R&D, ended up being acquired and stripped out of its creativity.
ioimage went down those lines first with DVTEL acquisition, hopefully FLIR will revive that brand and invest heavily in more R&D.
Then Avigilon took the edge recording out of VideoIQ because it doesn't fit their agenda of selling VMS and storage. The iCVR was a great product and with a little investment in more camera models and smaller size could have been an industry winner.
Curious to see what comes next but I am certainly not holding my breath. Seems like the commodification of surveillance cameras will also put the final nail in the Video Analytics coffin as the lines with "motion detection" get blurrier by the day.
Create New Topic
Brian Karas
I don't see how that would be possible. Just given the sheer number of analytics companies, there's a lot of them out there.
I would wager there's probably more VideoIQ/iCVR/Rialto devices still in active use 6 months after deployment than any other analytics, as a ratio of channels shipped:channels active.
Create New Topic
Undisclosed #2
I would lobby for analytics, but Clients often don't use it. I am a consultant, so I use analytics sparingly. There are some changes in the risk environments that makes certain analytics viable and saves the client on cost. In schools for example, virtual trip wire -- particularly when coupled with other rules such as motion, direction, etc -- are a viable solution to detect and display fence climbers and bad guys accessing rooftops. During the night, you would rely on the interior IDS to provide security.
I would be interested to find out what metrics integrators use for analytics (i.e. 2 hours for each camera? Some percent of overall bid amount?). Preferably, what labor hours do you expect to spend on VA (man hours is easier to translate across the country)?
Create New Topic