Video Analytics Usage Statistics 2016

By: IPVM Team, Published on Feb 25, 2016

Our previous video usage analytics statistics (in 2014) showed that integrator use of video analytics was flat from 2011 to 2014, a clear disappointment given that video analytics continues to be voted as the next big thing.

Now, we have run the same statistics again plus added an open ended question to gather more insights into the decision making process:

"What impacts your decision to deploy or avoid video analytics?"

150 integrators responded, and the responses show three key patterns: 

  • Skepticism is still the biggest enemy of video analytics usage
  • Poor performance in past keeps integrators hesitant to proactively recommend analytics
  • Manufacturers need to do better at marketing / positioning analytics

Statistics

*** ******** ***** ***** ********* ********** (in ****) ****** **** ********** use ** ***** ********* was **** **** **** to ****, * ***** disappointment ***** **** ***** analytics ********* ** ******* ** *** **** big *****.

***, ** **** *** the **** ********** ***** plus ***** ** **** ended ******** ** ****** more ******** **** *** decision ****** *******:

"**** ******* **** ******** to ****** ** ***** video *********?"

*** *********** *********, *** the ********* **** ***** key ********: 

  • ********** ** ***** *** ******* enemy ** ***** ********* usage
  • **** *********** ** **** keeps *********** ******** ** proactively ********* *********
  • ************* **** ** ** better ** ********* / positioning *********

**********

[***************]

*******, ******* **** ** integrators ****** ** ***** use ***** *********, ***** is * ***** **** percentage *********** ***** *********** all ****** ** ******* and *****. ******, **** 1 ** * ***** deploy ***** *********, ** shown ** *** ***** below:

*******, ** *** ******** side, ***** ** *******. While ***** *** **** to **** ******* **** to ****, * ******* jump ** ***** ** the *** **** ******* compared ** ******** ****:

Skepticism ** ********* *******

****** ********* **** **** in **** ***** ********* are *** **** ******** unless *** ******** ************ asks *** **** **** of ** ******* ** feature. **** *** * few ************ ****:

  • "* ***'* ***** **** are ***** *** ***** time. *** **** ********* that ****** *** ******** of ****."
  • "** ** ****** ** the ***** ** *** RFP"
  • "********* **** *** *** a ****, *** * do *** *** *** benefit"
  • "*** ***** ***, *********, not ************, ***** ** resources ** **** *** support *** *** *********"
  • "***'* ***** ** ***** well ****** ***"

******* ** *** ***** of ********* *** **** bringing ** *** *********** of ***** ***** *********, several ********* ***** ******* common ********* **** *****: cost *** ***** *****.

  • "**** ******** **** ********* by ******** ** ** bid *****. ***** *** unreliable ** ****** *** typical ***** ************."
  • "**** ** ****. ****** detection *** *** ********** usually **** *** ****."
  • "***** - ** *** client ******* ** *** for **."
  • "**** ** ***** ****** and ********** ** *** up. **** ******* ***** use **** ** ******* them. *** **** ********* they ******* **** **** to ******* **** *** to ***** ****** *** notifications."

Poor *********** ** ***** *** ***********

***** ********* **** ************* been ****** ** ******, both ** ***** ** the ***** ***** *** the ********* ********** (** the **** ** **** expensive ******* **** ******** analytics, ********* ******** ** processors, ** ********-***** ********), in ***** ** ***** and ************* **** *** the ********** ** ********, and **** *********** ** the **** ** ******** excessive ******* ** ***** alarms.  ** ***** *** analytics ** ** ***** worthwhile, ***** ***** ** be * ***** **** savings ** ******* *******.  We ******** ******* ********* that **** ** ******** that *** **** ********** deployments *** **** ** some **** ** ********* scenario.  ** ***** ***** the ********* *** **** as * **** ** an ******** ******* *****, alerting **-**** ** ****** guards ** **** ****.

***** *** ******** ******, the ****** ***** ** be ********, **** ***** alarms **** ** * minimum ** ***** *** system ***** ******** ** ignored.  ******** ** **** anti-analytics ********* ***** ***** lines ********:

  • "**** ** ***** ****** and ********** ** *** up. **** ******* ***** use **** ** ******* them. *** **** ********* they ******* **** **** to ******* **** *** to ***** ****** *** notifications."
  • "******* ** *** **** of ******** *** ***** of *** ******. ********* infrastructure *** ************ ** limitations ** ****. *********** of ********** *** ***** alarms."
  • "**** ***** ************ *** accuracy ** ******** ******. if *** **** ** too *********** *** ******** a *** ** ***** positives, ** ** *** recommend ***** *********, *******, do **** ********* ****** anomaly ************** ********."
  • "** *** ** ***** video ********, ******* ** lots ** ***** ********."
  • "*** *** ****** ***** Poor *********** ** ********* in *** ******* **** we *** (****)"

There *** ******* ******* ******

** *** *********** *** be ********, ****** ** product ********* ** ** ensuring *** ***** *** expectations ** *** ******** are ***** ********** ***** are ******* ******** ** integrators ********* ********* ********* and ****** ******* **** video ********* ** *******.  We ******** ******* *********** responses **** **** ******* in ********** *** *****.

  • "************ ** *** **** cost *** ***********/********. ** see ********* ********* ********* more ********* ** ****** testing *** ****** * more ******/******** ******."
  • "** ****** **** *** them, ** *** *** cost ** * ****** with ***** ** ******** or * ***** ***** analytics ****** ** ********* in *** ***."
  • "**** **** *****'* *** exiting. ******* ******** ***** (server *****, ****** *****, parts ** **** *****, main ***** ***** ***** hours. ******** ***** ***** are ********** **** ********* or ****** ******* ******. Also ** *********** ** fence ********* *******."
  • "** *** ********* ** part ** *** ******* central ******* ********** ********"
  • "***** ** ** ***** personnel (***** ** *******) of ********* **** ** predetermined ** *** **** of ***** ********** ** intervention."
  • "******** **** *** ****** after ***** ** ** non-staffed *****."

*** ********* ***** **** up **** *** **** perfectly:"******** ******** *** ****** manpower**** ******** ***********, ********* can **** * ***** cost ******* ** ******** applications.  

Additional ********** ************ *****

***** *** **** ****** usage ***** ** ******* around ********* ********** **** deployments, ***** *** ********** applications, **** ** ****** counting (******** ******** ** as * **** ** "Business ************"), ******* ***** recognition, *** ************ *** forensic ****** ** *****.  In **** ***** *********** see ***** **** ** being "*****" ******* *** direct *********** ** *** system, ********** ** *** form ** ***** ******, is **** ******* ** detrimental ** *** ********* operation.

  • "***** ********* ***** *** where **** **** * years ***. * ***** analytics ** * ******** tool **** ******** **** Briefcam ** **-****** **** Agent ** *** **** viable. **** ********** *** typical ***** ****** *** receive **** **** ********* and ****** * ******** to ******* ***** ******** video *** **** **** just ************. **** ***** said, ***** ** * significant **** ********** **** many ********* *** **** customers **** **** **** to *******."
  • "******* **** ******** ***** are. ** ***** ****** counting ** ***."

***** ** ********* *** storage ******* ** **** a *** ***** **** we *****'* **** ** previous *********:

  • "******** ******. **** ********* for ****** ** ******* requirements ******** ** ****** motion ***** *********."
  • "** ***** ***** ***** analytics **'* **** ** our ******** ******** *** reduction *** ********* *** storage *** ********* ** the ******* ****** *****."
  • "******** **'* * ***** as ** ***** ******* amounts ** ******* ***** not ****** *** ******** constantly."
  • "** ****** ***** ********* because **** **** ** can ****** *** ******* capacity, *****-******** ******* *** storing ** *** **** video ****, ***** *********"
  • "******* **** * **** year *******: *** ******* records ** ** ** hours/day. ***** *********, ********* decreases ** * ** 4 *****."

***** ******* ********* ** certainly * ***** *********** for *********, ** ** a ******** ****** ************* given **** ** *** hype ********* ************* **** promoted **** *** *****. Newer *********** ******* ********* ****** ** *.*** (*.*** ** ******* ****** vs *.***) *** ********* *********' ******* in ******* *********.

Analytics ********** ** *******

**** *********** *** ********** ********* analytics, *********** ****** ****** in ***** *** ***********:

  • "************, **'* **** ****** customer ******, ***** *** been ***. ********, **'** begun * ****** **** into ***** ********* ******* so **** *** *******, including *** **** ******** players, *** ***** ************ are ******** **** ****** at **** ***** ***** points."
  • "***** ******, ** ***** it ** *** *** the ******** *** *** benefit. *** ***** **** come **** ** **** (especially *** ******** *******) that ** *****'* **** sense ** **** *** it ** *** ***** process. **** **** * few *******, *** **** try ** ***. ***** they **** **, ***** not...at ***** **** ****'* have ** *** ***** for **."
  • "**** ********* ********* ********* we ******* ** ** our ********. *********, ** costs ** *** ********* although *'** **** * Chinese ************ ********* ********* with *** **** *******. Adaptive ******** ********* **** to **** ******. ** see ********* ********** **** in ***** ***** *** when ** ***** ** implementation **** ***'* **** to ****** **** ***** analytics ** **** ** be **** * *********** rather **** **** ****."

Manufacturers Need ** ** ******

**** *********** ***** **** manufacturers *** *********** *** unclear ************:

  • "** *** ** ***** them ****** ******* ** unrealistic ******** ************ *** also ******* ** *** administrative ******** **** *** larger *********."
  • "*** ****** ** ****** residential *** ***** ********. Although **** ***** ********* can ** **** ** this ****** ** **** not *** *** ******** to ****** ** ** make ******** *** *****-*******."
  • "*'** **** **** *********** demos *** *** **** client **** *** *** been ****** *** *********. And ****** * **** not **** ******** **** I ***** ********* ** having ***** ** ** core ****** ****. ****** unrealistic ** ****** ************ most ** *** ********* have *** **** ********. If ** *** **** active *********/***** ***** ********* I ***** *** **** changing."

*******, ********* *** ***** far **** * "**********" product, ****** **** *********** have ***** ******* **** a ******* *** ** manufacturers ** ** ******** applications.  ** ****** ********* to ******** ** **** challenges **** *********** *** meeting ************ ** * broad *****, *** *********** that *** ************ ****** proficient ** ******* ********* products *** *** ************ may **** ********** * head ***** *** * competitive **** **** ***** competition.

Comments (9)

For the purposes of the survey, is simple 'record on motion' considered an analytic?

The tragedy of Video Analytics mainstream adoption is the fact that every single company that had real potential with quality products, and high investment in R&D, ended up being acquired and stripped out of its creativity.

ioimage went down those lines first with DVTEL acquisition, hopefully FLIR will revive that brand and invest heavily in more R&D.

Then Avigilon took the edge recording out of VideoIQ because it doesn't fit their agenda of selling VMS and storage. The iCVR was a great product and with a little investment in more camera models and smaller size could have been an industry winner.

Curious to see what comes next but I am certainly not holding my breath. Seems like the commodification of surveillance cameras will also put the final nail in the Video Analytics coffin as the lines with "motion detection" get blurrier by the day.

Then Avigilon took the edge recording out of VideoIQ because it doesn't fit their agenda of selling VMS and storage. The iCVR was a great product and with a little investment in more camera models and smaller size could have been an industry winner.

As a point of public interest, maybe a special exemption could be granted allowing B.K. to respond? :)

Oh brother...

Fwiw, I was never a fan of the iCVR approach (too expensive, too bulky). I like what Avigilon did by making the VideoIQ analytics available in all new H4 cameras and at no additional cost.

Basically, I don't see a large market that wants high end analytics and long term on-board storage on the same device.

Exactly my point John. As far as I know, there are more iCVR's channels installed around the world than any other analytics. Brian can correct me if I am wrong..

Point is that DESPITE the bulkiness, and the unnecessary large hard-drives it was still a best seller.

with smaller form factor, smaller SSD and a freeware VMS like what used to be called VIEW, I think we would have seen a better adoption percentage for analytics.

The tragedy of Video Analytics mainstream adoption is the fact that every single company that had real potential with quality products, and high investment in R&D, ended up being acquired and stripped out of its creativity.

Without even needing to get into specific companies, I think the larger issue is that analytics is a feature, not a product.

There haven't been any "analytics" companies that have managed to be hugely successful because analytics on their own don't really do much. There's the obvious part about needing a camera to run on, but I think there are less obvious road-blocks as well.

Analytics really need a strong UI/UX to be valuable. In the security world this is essentially the VMS. If you can't percolate an alert up to an operator, and give that operator efficient tools to handle the alert and do things (audio talk down, toggle relays, move a PTZ), the analytics will have reduced value.

Even with ONVIF there still isn't a fully ratified, fully tested, fully functional API for:

  • Configuring rules/alarms
  • Receiving events
  • Automating responses (on Rule X do Action Y)
  • Sending feedback back into the system (tweak rule sensitivity, etc.)

This was even more true back when you and I were trying to push this stuff out into the world half a decade ago.

VideoIQ attempted to solve this by rolling an all-in-one solution, including a VMS that was tightly integrated. This worked really well for people that weren't married to a VMS, and less well for people that already had a VMS or needed features not in the free VMS.

IOI attempted to solve this by pursuing VMS integration partners and trying to be as flexible as possible, but that is neither easy or cheap.

But the result is that its kludgy and costly to make an analytics "product" that can be marketed as used as widely as a camera. We tend to see close partnerships with some VMS's and not others. Things don't work the same in every interface, features are not universally available, etc.

IMO it's a good thing that some of the most viable analytics companies have gotten acquired by larger camera/VMS manufacturers because I think that is the most probable path to success.

As far as I know, there are more iCVR's channels installed around the world than any other analytics. Brian can correct me if I am wrong.

I don't see how that would be possible. Just given the sheer number of analytics companies, there's a lot of them out there.

I would wager there's probably more VideoIQ/iCVR/Rialto devices still in active use 6 months after deployment than any other analytics, as a ratio of channels shipped:channels active.

Correct me if I'm wrong but the iCVR analytics were never just thrown in 'free', true? If Sagy intends "more iCVR channels installed around the world than any other paid-for analytic", that's possible, no?

I would lobby for analytics, but Clients often don't use it. I am a consultant, so I use analytics sparingly. There are some changes in the risk environments that makes certain analytics viable and saves the client on cost. In schools for example, virtual trip wire -- particularly when coupled with other rules such as motion, direction, etc -- are a viable solution to detect and display fence climbers and bad guys accessing rooftops. During the night, you would rely on the interior IDS to provide security.

I would be interested to find out what metrics integrators use for analytics (i.e. 2 hours for each camera? Some percent of overall bid amount?). Preferably, what labor hours do you expect to spend on VA (man hours is easier to translate across the country)?

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,366 reports, 855 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Fever Camera Sales From Integrators Surveyed on Jun 01, 2020
Fever cameras are the hottest trend in video surveillance currently but how much are integrators selling them? 220 integrators answered the...
Biggest Low Light Problems 2019 on Nov 08, 2019
Over 150 integrators responded to our survey question: "What are the biggest problems you face getting good low-light images?" Inside, we share...
Top 2019 Trend - AI Video Analytics on Dec 10, 2018
160+ Integrators answered: What do you think the top industry trend will be in 2019? Why? AI / video analytics was the run-away winner with...
Cloud Video Storage Usage 2018 on Oct 31, 2018
Storing email and documents in the cloud have long been common, with on-site email or file servers increasingly eliminated. However, what about...
Favorite Video Analytic Manufacturers 2018 on Apr 02, 2018
Video analytics is one of the biggest trends in 2018, driven by marketing for Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning. But what do integrators...
Video Analytics Usage Statistics 2018 on Mar 09, 2018
Video analytics is hot again (one of the top 2 trends going into this year), this time driven by deep learning and artificial intelligence. But,...
Top Problems Searching Surveillance Video (Statistics) on Oct 13, 2017
When crimes, accidents or incidents happen, the video surveillance system is a key component in finding out and proving what actually...
Exporting Video Surveillance Tutorial on Oct 05, 2017
Exporting video surveillance is important when incidents or crimes occur. However, there are multiple ways to export video which have their pros...
Favorite Video Analytics 2016 on Feb 22, 2016
Video analytics are security professional's choice for the next big thing. Despite that, our Video Analytics Market Guide and Favorites 2014...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Access Control Online Show - July 2020 - With 40+ Manufacturers - Register Now on Jul 01, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our July 2020 Access Control Show. With 40+ companies presenting across 4 days, this is a unique opportunity to hear...
Hanwha Face Mask Detection Tested on Jul 01, 2020
Face mask detection or, more specifically lack-of-face-mask detection, is an expanding offering in the midst of coronavirus. Hanwha in partnership...
UK Government Says Fever Cameras "Unsuitable" on Jul 01, 2020
The UK government's medical device regulator, MHRA, told IPVM that fever-seeking thermal cameras are "unsuitable for this purpose" and recommends...
Camera Course Summer 2020 on Jun 30, 2020
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training...
Worst Over But Integrators Still Dealing With Coronavirus Problems (June Statistics) on Jun 30, 2020
While numbers of integrators very impacted by Coronavirus continue to drop, most are still moderately dealing with the pandemic's problems, June...
FLIR Screen-EST Screening Software Tested on Jun 30, 2020
In our FLIR A Series Test, the cameras' biggest drawback was their lack of face detection, requiring manual adjustment when screening each...
Dahua Buenos Aires Bus Screening Violates IEC Standards and Dahua's Own Instructions on Jun 30, 2020
Dahua has promoted Buenos Aires bus deployments as "solutions that facilitate community safety". However, they violate IEC standards and,...
UK Firm Markets False Fever Screening, Hikvision Disavows on Jun 30, 2020
A UK security firm falsely claimed its Hikvision-based thermal solution could be used for "accurately detecting fever in any person", even claiming...
Industry Study: 83% of US Temperature Screening Sellers Falsely Say Not Medical Devices on Jun 29, 2020
83% of US companies selling temperature screening devices, aka 'fever' detectors, claim they are not medical devices, contrary to FDA definition,...
Manufacturers on Virtual 'ISC West' 2020 and Potential ISC West 2021 on Jun 29, 2020
With the 2020 ISC West show now officially canceled, attention turns to Reed's new "ISC West 2020 Virtual Event" planned for October and for the...