Smart ***** ***** **********
* ******* ******** ** new ******* ******** ** integrators *** *** ***** smart ******:

*** **** ****** ** clearly ************, ** *** after ******* ************ **** ***** ***** support.
******* ** * ********* below, *** *** *** that ***** *** ******** of *********** *** ****** use ***** ****** *** the ***** ******** *** them ****** *** *** time:

**** ** * ******* jump ******** ** *** 2016 ******, ***** **** 70% ** *********** **** they ****** ** ***** used ***** ******, *** only ~**% **** ***** or ******.
Bandwidth/Storage *******
*** **** ****** ****** given *** ***** ***** codecs *** (**************) ***** bandwidth/storage *******:
- "******** >**%. ** **** towards **** ********* ***** numbers ** ******* ***/** needs *** ****** ***** quality, *** ***** *****'* typically ****** ** ***** bandwidth *********** ***** *********** good *******, ******** ** to "** **** **** less"."
- "**% ** **** - because *** ****** *** models ** **** **** it *** *********/******* ********** is ****** *******."
- "** ** ****** **** the ******** *** *** helps *** **** ** storage *****."
- "******* ***% ** **** storage ***** *** *** my *******."
- "** ****** ********* **** (80%) *** *** ****** is **** **** ***********. I ***** ** ********* *** thus **** *******, ******* negatively ********* ** *******."
- "*** ******* *** ********* and ** ** * lot ** ****** **********"
************, ******** *********** ********* reducing ****** ** ** easing ** ******** **** shared ********:
- "***%. ******** *** ******* bandwidth ***** ** ******** of ******* ** ********"
- "**% ** ********* ******* we *** *** ***** codec *.*** *** ******** wise ****** ** *** Hanwha ******* *******. ***** on *** ********* *** less ********** ** ******* network"
- "*** ******* ****** *** this ** **** *** work *** **** ********* with * ***** ****** of ********** ******* **** have **** ** *** bandwidth/server ******* ********* ** we **** ** *** production ******* **** ** the ****."
Smart ****** *** ******
**** **** ************* **** introduced ***** ****** ***** our ****** ** ****, when****' ************ ***** ** ******* models ************,******, ************* ****** **** ********** new. ***, *** ******** of *** ******* ******* smart ***** *******, ********* *** cost ** **** ** high *** ******, ****** it **** **** ****** that *********** ***** ** introduced ** *** *******.
- "*** *** *** ******* with ***** ****** ** every ***** *****."
- "**** **** ***** ** 100% ** *** ******** brand ** *** ******* Smart ****** ** ********."
- "**** **** ***% ** our ******* ********* *** Smart ******. ** **** stuck ******** ** *** Axis * ****** ******* and ******* * ******* so *** **** ****."
- "******** ****, *** *** H4 **** **** ** by *******"
- "** *** ****** **** and *** ******** ** their *** ******* *** Zipstream *******."
Lack ** *******
**** *********** ***** **** they ****** ** ***** use ***** ****** *** so *** ** **** of *******, ****** ** the ****** ** *** side.
- "**** ** *** **** new ****** ************* ** old *** **** **** not ******* **** ******* or *** ****** **** does *** ******* **** vendor's *************** (******** **** not ******* *********, ********* does *** ******* ******** Smart *****)"
- "*********..... **** ******* **** we *** ***** ****"
- "*% *** **. **'** still ***** *.*** ** all *** *******. ** haven't **** *** *** codecs **** ****** *** of *** ******* **** we *****."
- "****. *** ********* ** Sony ****"
- "** ** ****.... *** enough **************** **** *** yet"
- "*** ******* **** ** utilize **** **** *.***+. Not **** ** * benefit ** ** ****** given **** *** *** does *** ******* ** (Luxriot)."
- "**%. **** ** *** support."
** ***** *** **** of *** ******* ********** interesting, ** *** ***** have ***** *** ****** when ***** ******* *******' smart ****** **** ********* VMSes *****, ********* ********, Exacq, *******, *********, *** NxWitness. ****** ****** **** as ***** ********, **** I-frames, *** ***** ****** were ******* **** ***** codecs **** ***** **********, we **** ****** *** these ****** ** ****. However, ** ********* ******* that ****** *** ******** with ***** *****.
Not *********: *********/******* *** *******
*******, ******* *********** **** they *** *** *** smart ****** ******* **** were *** *********, ***** storage ** *********** *** bandwidth *** ***** *******:
- "**** ***. ***** ******* H.264. **** ******** ********* some ***/***+ ****, *** haven't **** *** *******. **** test *** ****. ********* isn't ***** * ***** concern ** *** ********, so ***** ****'* **** a *** **** *** this ***."
- "** ***'* *** ****. Storage ** **** *****."
- "******* ** (**********) *********** for ******* *************."
Comments (3)
Jeffrey pope
I'm a bit confused. Has H. 265 worked out their kinks as of yet. The beginning of the article sounded as though they had, and yet in the end, how many still are refusing to go to it.
Create New Topic
Undisclosed End User #2
Yes Smart Codec, the way to go
Create New Topic