Testing Axis Zipstream

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Apr 13, 2015

Has Axis found its breakthrough differentiator? Can they demand a premium for this?

Axis claims Zipstream can "lower bandwidth and storage requirements by an average 50% or more."

We upgraded the firmware on the Axis Q1615 we first tested last September to test Zipstream.

Here is a 1 minute preview of the Zipstream test:

Undoubtedly, Zipstream can drop bandwidth consumption dramatically but here are the big questions:

  • What type of image quality degradation exists and when did it occur?
  • How much bandwidth consumption savings exists?
  • What mostly drives the bandwidth consumption savings - the dynamic RoI compression or the dynamic GOP variation?
  • How does Axis Zipstream compare to the most efficient bandwidth cameras on the market and to other bandwidth savings modes (like Arecont and Vivotek)?
  • How might it compare to H.265?
  • What type of issues occurred with VMSes?

*** **** ***** *** breakthrough **************? *** **** demand * ******* *** this?

**** ****** ********* *** "***** ********* *** ******* requirements ** ** ******* 50% ** ****."

** ******** *** ******** on *** **** ***** we***** ****** **** ********* ** **** *********.

**** ** * * minute ******* ** *** Zipstream ****:

***********, ********* ******* ********* *********** ************ but **** *** *** big *********:

  • **** **** ** ***** quality *********** ****** *** when *** ** *****?
  • *** **** ********* *********** savings ******?
  • **** ****** ****** *** bandwidth *********** ******* - the ******* *** *********** or *** ******* *** variation?
  • *** **** **** ********* compare ** ******* ********* ********* ********* *** ****** *** to ***** ********* ******* modes (*********************)?
  • *** ***** ** ******* to *.***?
  • **** **** ** ****** occurred **** *****?

[***************]

Key ********

**** *** *** *** findings **** *** ****:

******* *** ************** **** ** *** bandwidth ******* (**% ********* in ********* ****** **** this *****) *** ******* to ** *** *** innovation ****. **** ** the ******* ** ****** the * ***** ******** on ******, **** **** there ** ******* ******** (saves *********) *** ****** an * ***** ******** on ****** ****, *.*., something ***** ******* ** the ***** (******* ***** quality **** *** ******. In *** *****, **** Dynamic *** *******, ** saw * ***** ********* commonly ***** **** * to ** *******.

***** ***** ******* *********** **** ** ********** *********** on ***** ** ******* plates *** **** **** clear ***********, ********** **** dynamic *** *** ******* on ******* ** ***** (examples ******** ******).

******* *** **** ********** than ***** ********* ****** features** **** ****** ****** which ****** ************* ******* quality (*.*., *******) ** did *** **** **** much ** * ********** / **** *** * very **** ****** (*.*., Vivotek).

****** *** ***** ******* against *** ********* ********** cameras. ** ****** ****** from *****, ********* *** Samsung. **** ********* ***, Axis *** *** **** competitive. **** ********* '*****' out, **** *** ***** was *****. ** *******, especially **** ******* *** disabled, ******* **** *****.

**** ********* **** *.*** with ********* ******* ***: ***** *.*** *** reduce ********* ** ** 50% ******** ** *.***, Dynamic *** **** ****** bandwidth ** **%+ ** many / **** ************ scenarios **** *** ***** benefit **** ** ******** no ******* ** *** VMS **** (***** *.*** does) *** *** ********* to **** **** *.*** for **** *******.

** *** *********** ************ *** ********* ******** with ********, *****, ******* and *********.

Market ******

********* ** * ********** improvement *** *** **** a *********** ****** ******. However, ******** ********* ** limited ** ******-* ******* which **** * *** existing **** ******* *******. Most *** ******* ***** released ***** ******* **** support ******-* *** ********* Zipstream.

*** *** ******** ** whether ***** ************* *** enable / ******* / source ******* *** ** match ****.

********* ** ********* * 'Smart *.***' ***** **** claim ** ******* ** Zipstream *** **** *************, including *********, *** ********** H.265. *** ** **** will **** ********* * much **** ******** ************** for *** *********** ******.

Zipstream *************

********* ******* ******* *** a *** *** ** the ***** ****** ******** page ** *** ******'* web *********, **** *****.

**** *** ******** *** options: 

  • "*.*** ******* *********" *********** adjusts *********** ****** ** different ***** ** *** scene, **** ****** ******* less **********, *** ****** background ******* **** **********. Settings ***** **** *** to ****, **** **** different ****** ** ******* reduction *** ******* ******.
  • "******* ***" ****** *** camera ** ****** *** I-frame ********, ** * range **** ******** ** set ** *** *.*** tab, ** * *******, to * ******* ** 1200. *-***** ******** ** decreased **** ****** ******* are *******, *** ********* when *** ***** ** static ** ****** *********.

** **** ***** ** review *** ************* ******* for *********, ******* ******* quality *********** (** **** thereof) ** ***, ****, and ******* *** ******.

************ *******

*********, ************ *** ******** as * ****** **, with * *********, ***********, ********** ** ********* being **, ***, ***, medium, ** ****. ***********, **** can *** ** *******. With ****, *******, *********** parts ** *** ***** are ***** ** ** more ****** **********. ***********, it ******* **** **** is **** ********* *** default *********** ***** ***.

*** ***** ***** ***** the ********* ******** ** two *****, *** **** Zipstream ****** ***, ** the ****, *** ******* with ** *** ** High, **** ******* *** on, ** *** *****. Both **** * ****** quantization ***** *** **** deviation **** ***.

******* *** ********

*** ***** ***** ***** * comparison ** ******** ***** GOP (** ** **** case) ****** *** ******* GOP **** ** ********* (set ** **** ***), as ******** ** *********.

***** *-****** ** *** left *** ******, ***** 10 ******, ******** **** on *** ***** ******, from **, ** **, to **, ** *** camera ******* ******** ********* to **** ** ** the *****.

Bitrate ******

********* ******* ******* ** all ****** ******, **** best ******* ** *** motion ****** *** ********* scenes.

** ****** *********'* ******* on * ****** ***** and *** **** * moving ******* ** **** light ** **** *****. Bandwidth ********* **** *.* Mb/s **** *** ***** was ****** ** ***** 80 **/* (*.** **/*) when ***** ********* **** plus ******* ***.

*** ** **** ***** example ** ****** ********* reductions ** *** **** scene ** ***** *.* lux, **** **** ******* effects, ******** ******* **** nearly ** **/* ** ~2.7 **/*, ** ~**% reduction. 


******* ************

** ***** ******** ******** in ** ****** *** motion *****. ** **** light, ~*****, ********* ******* Dynamic *** *** ********** effective, ******** ******** ** 14% ** *** *** 25% ** **** ******** to ************ **** ********* off. *******, ******* ******* GOP ** ** **** still ***** ******* ******** by **** **% ** just **** *** **/*.

** * ***, *** effects ** *********'* ******* compression **** **** **********, reducing ******* ** **-**% Turning ******* *** ** in **** ***** ***** resulted ** ** **** 90% ********, ****** *** as ***** * **** as ** **** *****.

** ******* ******* ******, Zipstream *** ********* ********* to *** ****** ******* scene, **** ** ** 26% ********* ***** ******* ROI (******* ******* ***). Turning ******* *** ** increased ********** ** ** and **%, ********* ** the *****. ***** ********** are ***********, *** ******* compared ** ****** ***** due ** ****** ******* of ****** ** *** scene, **** ******* ********, foliage, *** ***** *********. 

High ***** **** **. ***

********** ** ********* *** to ********* **** **** similar **** ***** **** high ***** ***** *** low. ** *** ****** still *****, ******* ********** due ** ********* (******* dynamic ***) **** ******** higher **** ***** ** FPS **** ** ***. However, ********** *** ** dynamic *** **** ******** greater **** ***** ** FPS.

Image ******* ******

** *** *****, ** saw ******* ****** ** image ******* ****** ** Zipstream. ****** ******* *** text ******** ******* *******, without ******, ***** ********** objects (*******, *****, ***** and ***** ********, ***.), less ********* ** *** scene, ********* **** ***********.

** ****** ***** ******* in ******** ****** ****** below.

***** ********/****

*** ***** ***** ******** images ** *** ******* and **** ***** ***** with ********* *** (** the ****) *** * fixed *** ** ** vs. ********* *** ** High, **** ******* *** turned ** (******* ** 1200).

******* ******* ** **** is ********* *******, **** no ******* *********** ********* from *** ******** *********** or ****** *-***** ******** used ** *********. ******* details ** *** ******* are *******, *** **** the **** **** ** the **** ***** ** line * (*****) ** similarly ******* ** ****.

****** ********

******* **** **** ******* when ********* * ****** vehicle, **** ***, ****, and ******* *** ******** all **** ** ******* a ******* ***** ** ~15-20 *** ** * ~20' ***** ** **** without *****.

******* ******

******* ******* *********** **** most ********** ** ******* areas **** ****** *******, such ** *** ***** below. ****, ******* ******** and ****** ***** **** clear **** ********* *** appeared ******* ** ******* when ** *** ****** on, ******* ** *** Zipstream **** ***** *****. When ******* *** *** added, ***** ******* **** most **********, ********* ****, seen ** *** ***** below.

Versus ***** *************

********* ** ****** ********* at ******** ******* ** supported cameras. *******, ***** ************'* cameras ***** ******* ***** bitrate ** **** ******. 

*** **** ** *** scenes ** ******, ** did *** **** ***** test *** *********** *** the ***** ***-****, ********* 4132 *** ******* ***-****. Below *** *** *******:

VMS ***********

** *** ** ****** streaming ** ******* **** Zipstream ***** ** ******** Control ******, ***********, ******* Security ******, ** ********* XProtect. ********** ** ********* or ******* *** ********, cameras ********* *** ******** as ******, *** ******** was ******, ******* ***** gaps, **** ******* *** reverse.

**** **** **** ********* or ******* **** ***** in *** ***** ****** or *********, ****** *****, with *** ******** ********** a ***** ****** **** only *-***** ******* ******* until *** **** *-*****. This *** ** *********** when ******* ***-*********** (***, MKV, ***, ***.) ***** in **** ********.

******* *** ********** ********* settings **** ***** ****** Tool, ******** ***** ** set ***** ********** **** that ******, ******* ** using *** *** *********, shown ****:

Test *********

***** ******** ******* *.**.* was **** *** **** test. **** **** **** firmware ** *** *** publicly *********, *** *** supplied ** **** *** testing.

*** ****** ******** **** left ********* ****** *** WDR, ***** *** ****** off ** *** ******, and ********, ************ ** 1/30s.

*** ******** ****:

  • ******** ******* ****** *.*.*.**
  • *********** *.*.*.*****
  • ********* ******** ********* **** 9.0c
  • ******* *.* ***

Comments (12)

Are changes to Dynamic GOP triggered only by movement? Does changing motion sensitivity affect Dynamic GOP (I-frame sampling) sensitivity?

Also, if I understand it right, are the efficiencies diminished the lower the framerate is set to begin with (ie: greater at 30FPS vs 8 FPS)?

30 FPS vs. 10 FPS results are added above. In short, the differences are not that great, and close enough that I'd be hesitant to declare a winner one way or another.

Thorough testing!

Note that when streaming or playing back clips in VLC Media Player or Quicktime, errors occur, with the programs displaying a blank screen with only P-frame changes visible until the next I-frame.

Are Zipstreamed streams available as ONVIF streams?

Do you think that the h.264 is possibly non-standard, which might explain the VLC and AVinaptic behavior?

Yes, they are available via ONVIF.

No, I don't think it's non-standard. It's an I-frame/P-frame issue in those players. We're talking to Axis to get their read on the AVInaptic analysis.

I'm really wondering when you enable dynamic GOV/GOP how it doesn't impact according to your test - the blur in image... when you provide a key frame every ..10 seconds or worse what is your chance to get a plate or a face, or a sudden move..oups... Zip is focussing on moving parts, so like smartstream keep a better quality on moving pixel... but DGOV kills that, by adding more P-frames.

For outdoor non detailed scene (without LPR or Face reco in dark envir. with quick moves) I agree Zip+DGOV is one of the current option to decrease both bandwidth and storage.

To be compared also with adaptive streaming based on 1 key frame and no P-frame when no activity is reported by motion detection, raising to normal fps when motion arises.. In that case, you can keep your key frame for police, it's supposed to be correct

I have experience Smart stream with good quality on moving pixels and/or Roi and big compression on static scene. MAin concerns is to explain to the customer why the static scene pixelise when darkness arises... even with DNR is enable

I should read the review more carefully. But... grumpy engineer-user response:

so you came up with this overly complicated video compression scam, then you deployed just enough of it to work, and now you're "tuning" it (if you insist calling tweaking a compression algorithm "tuning") and you want me to get excited about it?

Any camera vendor can twist the H.264 voodoo. It's gotta have a billion knobs and dials on the inside no matter how much is exposed through the interface. I don't see this as a differentiator I see it as an enabling technology for more incompatibility.

Rodney, you really should review the review more carefully. Why would you preface a sweeping, ungrounded, attack with that fatal admission?

How is 'incompatability' an issue given that we tested it and it worked with 4 of the biggest VMSes in the world without anything done on their part?

Secondly, if 'any camera vendor can twist the H.264 voodoo', why isn't Axis doing the vodoo on all of their cameras instead of just the new ARTPEC-5 ones? Any if this is just knob and dial turning why hasn't anyone else done this?

There is something genuinely new and useful here. Period.

I have understood the priciple behind the idea. They want to mimic Human brain. Only use the most relevand data in the image and the rest compress it to maximum.

After a couple of modification to the logic behind the software i think it could make a big diference in certain aplications.

I'm curious what the net effect of Dynamic GOP running together with VMD framerate speed-up on the VMS would be. It occurs that VMD framerate speedup functions like a poor man's Dynamic GOP. Although not increasing the cardinal interval between I-frames, VMD speedup does increase the realtime interval between I-frames and thereby reduces bitrate.

Of course motion detection has to be setup, and there are only two levels of frame-rates, so cruder for sure. Still I think if someone is using VMD speedup aggressively, they will not see as large a benefit from Dynamic GOP.

btw, Geurtebruck apparently has encoders that use Dynamic GOP...

Those Geuterbruck encoders are MPEG4.

Yes, from back in 2008!

Here's a spec sheet from an updated one:

Genetec has integrated Zipstream settings for Axis cameras to their Config Tool, seen here:

These settings directly correlate with Zipstream settings in the web interface, so users may now configure them from here.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,429 reports, 865 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Hanwha Wisenet X Plus PTRZ Tested on Feb 14, 2020
Hanwha has released their PTRZ camera, the Wisenet X Plus XNV-6081Z, claiming...
Micron 1 TB SD Cards Aim To Eliminate NVRs on Apr 08, 2020
Micron has boldly proclaimed their latest 1TB microSD "eliminates the need...
NetApp Video Surveillance Profile on Mar 09, 2020
NetApp is increasing its efforts in video surveillance and told IPVM...
YOLOv5 Released Amidst Controversy on Jul 27, 2020
YOLO has gained significant attention within video surveillance for its...
Avigilon Open Analytics Tested on Apr 16, 2020
After years of effectively closed analytics, Avigilon decided in late 2018 to...
Video Surveillance History on May 06, 2020
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going...
Avigilon ACC Cloud Tested on Jul 08, 2020
Avigilon merged Blue and ACC, adding VSaaS features to its on-premise VMS,...
Dotty "Hot Or Not" Elevated Body Temperature App Tested on Jun 01, 2020
What if you could take an existing phone or tablet and transform it into...
Vivotek LPR Camera Tested on Apr 15, 2020
Vivotek has historically sold license plate capture cameras but not LPR. Now,...
HID Releases Lower-Cost Signo Readers on Mar 06, 2020
HID Global is releasing a new line of readers called Signo they claim read...
Injes Tiny Temperature Terminal Tested on Jul 17, 2020
While temperature terminals have trended bigger, the Injes DFace801 is...
Dahua Temperature Measurement Station Tested on Jun 17, 2020
Dahua hit the market hard with its original 'fever' camera (tested here)....
Converged vs Dedicated Networks For Surveillance Tutorial on Feb 12, 2020
Use the existing network or deploy a new one? This is a critical choice in...
Anyvision Presents AI Facial Recognition and Mask Detection on Jun 08, 2020
AnyVision presented its AI facial recognition and mask detection at the May...
Startup Videoloft Presents Cloud Storage on May 27, 2020
Videoloft presented offsite cloud storage at the May 2020 IPVM Startups...

Recent Reports

Google Invests in ADT, ADT Stock Soars on Aug 03, 2020
Google has announced a $450 million investment in the Florida-based security...
US Startup Fever Inspect Examined on Aug 03, 2020
Undoubtedly late to fever cameras, this US company, Fever Inspect, led by a...
Motorola Solutions Acquires Pelco on Aug 03, 2020
Motorola Solutions has acquired Pelco, pledging to bring blue back and make...
False: Verkada: "If You Want To Remote View Your Cameras You Need To Punch Holes In Your Firewall" on Jul 31, 2020
Verkada falsely declared to “3,000+ customers”, “300 school districts”, and...
US GSA Explains NDAA 889 Part B Blacklisting on Jul 31, 2020
With the 'Blacklist Clause' going into effect August 13 that bans the US...
Access Control Online Show July 2020 - On-Demand Recording of 45+ Manufacturers Presentations on Jul 30, 2020
The show featured 48 Access Control presentations, all now recorded and...
Face Detection Shootout - Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Jul 30, 2020
Face detection analytics are available from a number of manufactures...
Sunell is The First China Manufacturer to Market NDAA Compliance on Jul 30, 2020
Most China manufacturers are going to be impacted by the NDAA 'Blacklist...
Ink Labs Relabels China YCX Fever Camera And Steals Dahua's Marketing on Jul 30, 2020
A US company marketed a 'thermal temperature scanner' as its own, selling...
Genetec and Dahua-Backed Intelbras Split Examined on Jul 29, 2020
China is the cause of the breakup between Canada's and Brazil's largest video...
This YouTuber is Now Selling ThermoHealth Temperature Screening on Jul 29, 2020
An enterprising 20-year old is mass marketing medical devices on Facebook and...
Hikvision Returns To Growth Driven By Overseas Fever Cameras on Jul 29, 2020
While Hikvision's revenue fell in Q1 2020, it rebounded in Q2 attributed to...
Brazil's Biggest Domestic Surveillance Company Intelbras Profile on Jul 29, 2020
While Intelbras is not widely known outside of Latin America, Intelbras is a...
The Kiosk Market Pivots To Temperature Screening (Interviewed) on Jul 28, 2020
Video surveillance is not the only market that has pivoted to medical device...
Integrator Acquisitions 'A Good Market' During COVID-19, Says Greybeards on Jul 28, 2020
Industry broker Ron Davis of the "Greybeards" says that the integrator and...