Pelco Sold Off, Now Independent

"Pelco's CEO told IPVM that Pelco's strategy remains the same, emphasizing the long term goal of being a "leader in predictive video analytics solution" as they expand their VMS, cloud and AI offerings. "

So Pelco is going to succeed by doing things they've never done well?  Keep following the same strategy that led to massive losses, lay-offs and a fire-sale?  The remaining employees livelihoods' are on the line.  Please reconsider Mr. Theolier!

I would argue that they could be successful by just returning to their knitting.   Make great Dome and PTZ cameras, specialty cameras & enclosures for marine environments, etc.  Offer excellent support.  I know the PTZ market is in decline but it still exists.  John is right, the "not from China" play will help.

My point is that Pelco's days as the center of the universe in CCTV are gone.  They are more likely to succeed if they accept this and focus on their strengths.

Transom is the gas station in the middle of nowhere between Schneider and their actual destination. The question is who is Transom planning to sell Pelco to in the next year or two after they apply some ARMOR.

I am cautiously optimistic that with the right product management they could arise from the ashes.  I still voted neutral for sandbagging purposes.

Right now the product line is a disarray due to the need to support so many legacy products.  Being able to support legacy items and still bring into their modern products is both a curse and a blessing.  It is a blessing as they have a built in customer base and it cuts down on some of the complete rip and replace cost.  Legacy equipment support is a curse because supporting all this legacy junk makes a unnecessary hodge podge of unreliability that has tarnished the brand.  At some point they have to cut these cords and focus their efforts on new, innovative project like they used to when untethered from the need to support various dead/dying products.  Panasonic and Bosch both suffer from this curse/blessing.

i have not looked at VideoXpert lately but there may be some promise there if efforts are redoubled on development, DSSRV and Endura are put in the same category as Windows XP.  Mounts for every occasion (see the SWM-CA for a unique/great one) were one huge advantage of Pelco.  I hope that is resurrected.

I look forward to another NA manufacturer that is competitive.

Make cameras.

Make cameras in America.

Make fairly priced cameras in America.

Make cameras that work WELL on as many open platforms as possible

Provide AWESOME tech support

The brand might have a 2nd chance if they focus on what integrators and end-users need.

With nearly 400 votes, some observations on the Pelco poll results:

Overall, not good but I thought it was going to be much worse. Looking at the polling for the Qognify/OnSSI deal, that was bad with an ugly 15 postive, 27, neutral, and 57 negative.

Also, a moderately bullish sign, for Pelco, integrators were modestly net positive with a 34 /37/29 breakdown compared to manufacturers who were net negative with a 26 / 28 /45.

Pelco still has a lot of work and Transom needs to be willing to dedicate the money and time to make that happen but overall there seems to be receptivity to a turnaround if Pelco can put the work in.

I wonder if the Verkada is referring to Pelco when they say their slaying Dinosaurs.

I voted positive with a bit of trepidation.  They were late to the IP game and hurt them badly but they knew their analog and their software devs were good (before schineder, a lot of us left/layed off) The have the manufacturing knowledge to make great product and Clovis is still low-overhead.  Maybe it is time to start making cameras in america again :-)

I will watch them closely!

Can anyone offer a compelling reason to specify Pelco at this point?

PELCO reminds me of the Dodge truck line in the Late 80's Early 90's their new truck body styles coming off the line looked old when they were brand new. NO ONE WAS BUYING THEM!     

PELCO has a lot of bad publicity and reputation to put behind them.    If PELCO could cure cancer they may have a shot of getting back into the VMS market.

I loved using PELCO for many years back in the analog days but haven't seen anything exciting from them in a long time.

I wish them all the best with their new owners, hopefully they have enough in their tanks to make it back to the top of the heap.  PELCO certainly has a long uphill journey ahead of them with lots of competition ahead of them with years of experience and success's in this market.

I think Pelco lost its chance to remain relevant many years ago. Yes they were pioneers, but they did not remain innovative enough to keep leading the pack. They have way to much restructuring pain ahead of them not to mention catching up to do.

"Pelco's CEO told IPVM that Pelco's strategy remains the same, emphasizing the long term goal of being a "leader in predictive video analytics solution" as they expand their VMS, cloud and AI offerings. The company also said that they remain committed to being an end-to-end provider, including manufacturing cameras (not made in China)"

In my opinion the statement above goes to show just how out of focus they are. Industry leaders in Video Analytics, VMS, Cloud, AI offerings, and they want to be the end-to-end provider? Sorry, but I don't see a streamlined vision here. I see a company struggling to remain relevant in an industry that has already left them behind. This is only my personal opinion on this subject. My opinion aside, I truly wish them the very best.