Milestone Launches Marketplace Where Nothing Is For Sale

This website could have been built by 5 people. What are the other 40 doing?

Worth noting, Milestone's press release has a better / more accurate description of what this is:

Milestone Marketplace is a centralized knowledge hub for the industry, including installation guides, demos, and other relevant documentation 

It is a 'knowledge hub'. It is not a 'marketplace'.

It's Milestone Solution Finder with a new name.

This seems to be no different that locating certified technology partners for any manufacturer via their website.

John and all, my apologies for the long comment (if you want you can move it off to another page) but only part of what is being said here rings true for me.

I don't think you can evaluate Milestone's Marketplace like you do a product. It's an initiative with very strong investment by Milestone. Right now we see the framework being described. It's a framework for interaction, and it's new so there the interaction is just starting.

Consider the difference between IP Video Market.info when it first launched, and what the IPVM experience is now. IPVM launched received mixed reviews, and as I have said from day one, IPVM will be (and now is) an incredibly important resource that it's hard to imagine going without. Most of the initial criticisms of the nascent IPVM have been proven false given the depth of what IPVM has evolved into. And it's still growing.

In order to have correctly evaluated IPVM at its launch, you'd have to have looked at what value the IPVM vision was and what its value would be years out - and what the value of video would be in the future that we are now living. Part of the IPVM vision was a knowing belief that video would become a critically important technology well beyond what it was at IPVM's birth. 

I interpret Milestone's statements on frictionless engagement to be a statment of intent about what they have intvested in and commited themselves to bringing into fruition.

Just like some said that IPVM would be a flash in the pan and so on, others with a more forwward looking view didn't think so. (Slight pause while I pat myself on the back.) I took heavy criticism from some industry folks for being pro-IPVM at that time. Not any more.

Milestone is more energtically serious (that's the opposite of deadly serious) about Marketplace than I can remember any company being about a comittment to things of smaller scale than this global initiative. It's not about product - it's about how we conduct business from initial states of awareness of a technology's potential - all the way to partnering with the people that can make it happen as customer deployment.

Consider the complex computing, network and data exchange infrastructures that are involved in what technology is making possible. Legacy thinking is a system deployment with workstations and servers, an O/S and a few software products. Tomorrow's deployments (some are already happening now) are virtualized systems with thousands of mobile users, many dozens of systems interacting, hundreds of software components running on virtualized compute platforms - some parts on premises and some parts in the cloud - that can be evolved and expanded as technology advances. 

To support that kind of infrastructure requires a different approach to "going to market" than could be done in the past. It will only work because (a) it's needed and (b) it's the only way to do business given the exponential advance of technology and the explosion in the number of products. Right around the corner are micro-products - software and virtualized hardware resources that can subscribe and deploy instantaneously. 

So I see the Marketplace vision as one that is intended to evolve as the nature of products evolves and as the relationships between service providers and product providers become more numerous and more important.

Continuous delivery and continuous deployment are the engineering approaches to provide applications that evolve in place. We see that in our phones and where IT has shifted to. Do you think that the security industry's approach to going to market is a fit for that? PSA Secrutity Network is working hard to help integrators transition into a world in which subscription-based services and RMR are foundational elements. It's been an uphill journey so far - because of the mismatch between 20th century industry practices and those we need now.

Also take into account that Marketplace has community dynamics which, when energized, tend to take on a life of their own and keep growing and evolving.

I think that one of the most important statements Milestone made, which I didn't see in this report, is that Marketplace succeeds when its members succeed - and their success is the measure of Marketplace's success. That's what it's intended for and I think is a missed point in this article. Not just "success" in terms of selling stuff, but success that means the industry service providers live up to the promise of technology by helping their customers make maximum use of it.

Is that the future that you want, or do you want the security industry to stay the way it has been for the last 50 years? IPVM was started beause many things about the way the industry worked were seriously flawed. And there is no questioning that IPVM has had beneficial impacts on the industry and has made life easier for many consultants and service providers and their customers.

I think we'll be saying similar things about Marketplace just a few years from now - and it will only then still be getting started.

NOTICE: This comment has been moved to its own discussion: In Defense Of The Milestone Marektplace