Lenel Favorability Results 2019

By: IPVM Team, Published on Mar 26, 2019

The positive news for Lenel is that integrators do not dislike them as much as they used to.

The negative news for Lenel is that integrators overall still do not like them, as 2019 IPVM favorability results show:

fav lenel 2019

This comes at a pivotal time for the embattled access control pioneer, as their owner UTC, has taken the highly unusual step of buying a competitor, S2 and merging Lenel and S2.

Inside this note, we examine the main themes that illustrate the problems Lenel faces and which areas they need to turn around if they want to remain one of the largest access brands.

*** ******** **** *** Lenel ** **** *********** do *** ******* **** as **** ** **** used **.

*** ******** **** *** Lenel ** **** *********** overall ***** ** *** like ****, ** **** IPVM ************ ******* ****:

fav lenel 2019

**** ***** ** * pivotal **** *** *** embattled ****** ******* *******, as ***** ***** ***, has ***** *** ****** unusual **** ******** * **********, ************ ***** *** **.

****** **** ****, ** examine *** **** ****** that ********** *** ******** Lenel ***** *** ***** areas **** **** ** turn ****** ** **** want ** ****** *** of *** ******* ****** brands.

[***************]

Main ******

*******, ***** ***** ***** significant ******** ** *** access ******, **** ******** illustrating ****** *** ******:

  • *** **** *******
  • ******* *** *********
  • ***-**-**** **** *********
  • ************ ** ********

Risk ** **

***** *** **** ****** are ********** **** **** years, * *** ******* is **** *** / Lenel **** **** **. Many ********* *** ** acquisition, **** ******* ********* that **'* ******* *** dealer ******* ***** ** negatively ******** ** *****:

  • "***** ******* * **** ever ***** ****. * was ** ************ **** they ****** **."
  • "** *** **. **** be *********** ** *** how **** ***** ***."
  • "*'* ****** **** *** S2 ******** *** ******* fresh **** **** *****."
  • "*** ******** ** **** is **** **** *** very ********, *** *** product ** *****. **** the ****** ** ***********, we'll *** **** ***** next."
  • "* ***** ***** ******** of ** *** * smart **** - ********* they ***'* **** **."
  • "*'* ** *** ** hear **** ****** **. It's **** * ****** of **** ****** ***** drives **** **** *** ground *** *** ** existence."
  • "** **** *** ** Acquisition *****'* *** ****** back ** ***** *** waters."
  • "*** ** **** *** acquisition ** ** *** the *********** ** ** entire ******* *** *** user ****. ** *** one ****** **** **** from ***** ** ** and *** **** *** a ****** ** ***********."

** *** ******** ****, Lenel *** ****** ******* **** **** Chief ******* ******* ** the ******** *******, ****** **** * strong *** *********** ******* leader. *******, *** **** and **** ** *** deal **** *** ********** remains ** ** ****.

Comparison **** ** ****

***** ******** ** ****** integrators ** **** ******** and **** ******* ** the *******, ** *** comparison ***** *****:

comp lenel

*******, *****'* ******** ******* remained *********** *********, ********* a **** ***** ** confidence ** **** * well ***** *** *********** brand.

Bad **** *******

*** ** *** '*****' complaints ******* ***** ** 2017 ** ***** ** issue ** ****, **** the *******'* **** ******* support ******* **** ******* soured ** *** ***** as * *****:

  • "******** **** ******* *** products, ********* **** ***'* 'Lenelify' **"
  • "**** ******** (*******), ******** software *** *******."
  • "** ** **** ******* converting ***** ******* ** many ***-***** *** *** satisfied **** *** *******, support, ** *****."
  • "** **** ********* **** have *** * **** time ******* ******* ** Lenel."
  • "**** ** *** **** well ** *** ******* space *******, ** **** have ****** ** ******** with *** *** ******* to ******* * *******, which ***** *** **** support ****** ***** *******."
  • "********** *** **** **** support."
  • "**** *** *** **** supportive *** ***** ******* for ******** ** ********** and ***** ******* **** for ****** ****** **** "expedited" ***** *** **** impressive ******* *** ***** like ******* *** ******** as *** ** ** overall ********."
  • "**** ****** *** ******** customer *** **** *******."
  • "****** ** ** *******."
  • "**** ***'** ** *** Lenel ****, ****** *** support."
  • "*** ********* ** ***** their **** *******, ** lack ** *********. **** we **** **** ******* it's ******* ******* ** a ***** ***** ** lack ** ******** ** a *******. ********* ** takes * *** ***** and ******* *** ******** Sales ******* ******** ** get *** ***** ****** up *** *****. "

Too *********

******* ****** ********* **** Lenel ** ****** *** high ******** ** ****** to ******* *** **** users. ******* ******** *********

  • "*** ***** *** ********* with **** ** *** they *** ******* ***** new ************ ******. *** too ********* ** ******** shudder **** ******* **** a *****."
  • "*** *** **** ******** for ****** ******* *** too ********* *** ** market. *** * **** tha ***** **** ******* has ****** ****** ***. Pass."
  • "***** *** ***** *********. Too ********* *** *** customers ******."
  • "** * *** **** product, **** ** *** supposed ** ** * consideration, *********** ** *** thing. *** *** ****...? Okay, ****'** **** *****."
  • "* ***** *** ******* is ***** *** **** expensive. ***** *** *** been **** ********** **** there *** ** *** earlier *****. ** *** getting **** ******** ** rip ** *** **** to *** ** **."
  • "**** ******* *********. **** priced. **** ******* *********."
  • "****** ********. **** ***********. High **** ** ***** business **** ******** ************ and ******** *********** ******."
  • "**** ******* *** ****** and **** *****'* ****** kept ** ***** *******."
  • "** **** **** **'* a **** ******** *** expensive ."
  • "********* ******** *** ********* it ** ** ********."
  • "** *** ********** **** is ********* *** ******."

Dated ********* & ***********

****** **** ******* ******* to ******* ** *** common ********* **** *******'* interface ** *** *** lags ****** ****** ** terms ** **********, ********, and **** ****** ** deploy ******:

  • "***** *** *** **** up **** *** *****. Older ********** **********. * have ***** * *** Lenel ******* ***. ***** put *** **."
  • "************ ********; *** ** the ********* ******* ***** items ***********. *** ******** structure ** * ****. Icons *** *** *** outdated. ******** ******* *****!"
  • "********. *** ******* *** heavy ** ******."
  • "*******, **** **********."
  • "****** *********** *** ****** control."
  • "******** ** ** *** old **** **** **** of ********* ** ****"
  • "****** *** *****."
  • "**’** ***** **** ****, but ***’* **** *** best ********** ** ****, from *** ******* ********, to ****, ** *** really ********** ***** ********…"
  • "* ***** ***** ** overrated - ***** ***** integration **** *** ****** platform ** **** - I **** *** **** impressed. "
  • "* ******* **** **** are ** ********** ******* although *** ******** *** is ***** ***** *** lacks *************."
  • "**** ***'* **** **** software, ******** *******, ** price ***** *** *** some ****** **** ***** think **** *** ** elite ****** ******* *******."

Bad ******* *************

*** ****** ***** ** still ********** ******* ** they ***'* **** ***** partners *** *******. ******** mentioning **** ****** ************* nor ********** ** ******* the ******** ******* **** new **** *** ******:

  • "**** ******** ******* ** both *********** *** *** users. ******* **** **** have **** ******** ****** that **** *** *** of *** ***** ************* out *****. "
  • "** ******* ** *** insignificant *** **** ** even ****** *** ***** when ** ****."
  • "*** ***** ** **** treating ** **** ** did *** ******, ** we ***** **."
  • "*** **** **** - can't **** ***** ****** you're ** *** ****. Would ***** ***."
  • "** ******* ******* ***** years *** *** **** remain * *** ** service ****** ********."
  • "**** ****** ** *** a ***, ** ** not *** **** *** friendly **** ** *** business"
  • "***** ****, *** ***** customer ******* **** **** to ******* *******. "
  • "* ******* ****, ** Canada, *** * ******* of ************ ******* * way ** "*** ** the ****". * **** to *** ** **** government ****** ******* ****, but **** **** *** allow ****** ******* *** door."
  • "** **** ********** **** them ** ******** ** inquire ***** ***** * dealer *** ***** ******* a ********."

Lenel *********

*** *** ******** ******* a ******** ****, **** a ******* ******** ******** the ******* *** **** support, ******** *******, *** efforts ** **** **** from **** ***********:

  • "** ******* ** * Lenel *** *** ***** I **** **** ****** with ********* ********* **** Lenel ***, ******* **** are ******** ********* *** OnGuard ******** *** *** time, **** ******* ****** with ********* ** **** a ***** *** ** work ****, *** *** expanding ********** **** ***'* purchase ** ***** ********* and ******** **** *** Lenel ******' (**** ********* and **). ** **** time, ** ** *** lead ******* *** **** had ******* **** ****."
  • "****** **** *** *******. Stable *** *********. **** where **** **** ** be ***** **** *** S2 ********. ***** **** to *** **** ****** applications."
  • "**** ****** ********, ********* hardware."
  • "**** *******, ******* ******, good **** *******."
  • "* **** ***** *** the **** ********, ********** price ***** *** ********* of ******** ** *** industry. * **** **** that **** *** ********** improving *** ********* *** interface ** ** **** friendly."
  • "******** ** * ****** challenge, *** ********* ******* is ****."
  • "* **** **** ********** Lenel *** *** **** 15 ***** ***. ******* I **** **** * positive ** **** ****. They **** *** ***** ups *** *****. **** ups ******** ******. ***** new *** ******* **** have ******* ******** *** really ******** ** ** good *** ******. *** latest *.* ******* ******** the ******* ************* ******* of ****** ** ** the ******* ******* **** 7.4. ***** ** ****** to * **** ***** based ******** ** ****. Hopefully **** **** ****. "
  • "******** ** ************ ********** well ** *** ***** environment. ***** ** *** about *** ********, ***** does ********** *** ****."

Outlook *** *****

***** *** *************** ******** ***** *** feeling ***********, ***** ** *********** by **** ******* *** company ** ******** *** dated.

*** *** *** ******** Lenel **** ***, *** sentiment ** ********** ******** by ************.

***** *******, *** *** experiment **: **** ** turn ****** ****** *** Lenel ** **** ***** run ** **** *** ground?

Comments (12)

*********** **** ** ********** that ****** * ********* approach ** **** ** necessary ** ***** ***** partnerships *** ** ******** the ***** ** *** solution. *** **** ** present * ***** ******** case **** **** ********; need *****, ***'* ******* have **, *** ** both ******** ** *******, they ***** *** *** Lenel ****** ** **** from ***. *********, *** would **** **** *** their ******* **** ** your ******, ****** ******* from **** *** ****** on ******* *** **** Lenel *** ** ********? This ** **** *** most ************* **** **** an **********-***** ********.

**** ** ******** ****** about *** ***** **** interface. *** **** ** a ******** ** **** customers *** ** * modern, *** ******* ********* and ****** ****? ****, how ********* ** ****** outside *** ******* (***** permissible.)

*** ***** ** ********* how ***** * ******** will ******* ** *** age *** **** ** an *********. **** *** more *** ***** *** becoming **** **** ***** and *** **** ******* and **** **** *** an ********* **** ***** circa **** **** **** question ** *** ****** itself ** ******. ***** isn't *** **** ****** that ***** ***** **** something **** ******* *.*/**.

*** ***/******* ****** ** becoming **** *********. ********** if *** *** *** the ****** ****** **** a ******* **** *** don't **** ** ***** about ******** ******* ***** time *** ******* *** system ** *** ******** has ** ******* **'*.

********* ** *****'* ****** how **** *** **** the ******** *** ***** and *********** ** *** system **** **** ***** choose * ***** ******* interface.

***** **** ** ******* the ****** ******** *** with **** ** **** a ******* **** ****** every ******** ** ********* customer ** ******** **** asks *** ** ******* one ** ***** *** 3 ********* ***** *** system.

*******, *** *** ***% correct. ** **** ** well ****** ** **** looking *** ****** **. We ******* * **** group **** *** ******* customers (*** ****** ******* using *** ******* ***** not *** ***** **********) and ***** **** **** they ***** **** ** see ** * *** UI..Here ** *** ******:

Galaxy UI

**** ** ****** *** is **** * ************ tries ** **** ***** UI **** ****** ** merely ********* *** ***** on *** ******.

**** ****** *** * total **-***** **** *** traditional ***** ****** ** a ******** *** ***** application. *** **** * UI ******.

* ****** ******** ******* in * ********* ****** control ************* *** ******* meetings ** ******* ********** their ******** ******.

*** ** ***** *** eliminated ***** *** ***** meeting.

*** ******?

*** **.

"* ***'* *** **** in ***** ** ** leadership. ** ***** **** something **** ****."

*'** *** ******** ***** which ************ **** ***.

* **** ** ******* is ******* ****** ** April ***?, *** **** just * **** *** email ** *** ****** else ******* *** **** notification?

** ***** ** *** have **** *** ******...

*** ******* *** **** on **? ** ******!

***** * **** ***** most ***’* ** *** industry **** **** **** were ******** ** **** who ***** **** ******** bell ******* ***** ** a ****.

** ***’* ******, **** out ** ******* ***** on ** * **** known ****** ***** ******* creating **** *** ********. Sign ** ***** ** $75k *** $**** * year ******** ******. * guess *** **** ** really *** *** **** looks!

**** * **** ************. #4, *** *** *****, it ** **** ** spend * *** ** money ** ******** ********* to ****** ****** **** experiences. ** ******, *** value **** ** **** than ****-****. ** *********** that ***** **** ** a *** ******* **** updates ********* *** ** secure. * ****** *** that **** *** ****, and ** ********** ***** users **** **. *** features **** ***** *** with ****** ***** ******** will ** ***** *********** (and ****'** **** **** doing ** ***).

************* ********** *******....”***** ***********” blah **** ****.

** *** ***** *** time *** ****** ****** a ******** *******, *** could *** *** **** the *** ** ***** management *** *****, *** when **** ***’* ****** standout ************* **** ** any ****** ** *** competition, ***** *******.

* ******* *** ** acquisition **** ** ***** attempt ** *********** *** look *** **** ** using ** ** *** new **, *** **’** be *** **** ******* OnGuard.

****’** ***** ** **** about ************ **** ******** xyz, *** ****’** *** be ******* ***’*...*** ****** or ****** **********.

**** ***** ** *** frustration ** ****-************** *******, another ****** *** ********* with... *** ***** *** effort.

***** **** ******** *********** and ******* * *******, history *** ***** ***** mergers ** *** *** nothing **** **** ************ in * **** *****.

***** *** ******* *********** their ******** ********* ******* the *******. ** **** their *** ******* ***** is ****** **** ** how ** ***** *** more *********** *** ** works. ** * *** years ***** **** ** very ****** ***** ****** other **** **** **** end **************. *** **** product *** **** **-******* and **** *** ******** to ****** ***** ************ from ****-******* ** ********** making *** *********** ******, easier ** ********* *** functionality.

***** ** * **** my ****** **** ***** as * *** *** they **** **** **** tremendous ************ *** **** few *****. ******** ***** latest ******* *.* *** been *** ******* ** install ** **** ***** and ***** *** *** modules *** ********* ************* and ******** **** *** first ****.

*** ***** *** *** president ** ***** **** the ********* ** ***** developing * ******* ******* of ********** * *****. You *** ***** ****** as ******** ** **** Moss ** ********** * positive, *** *** ******* for **** ******.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Genetec Synergis Cloud Link - Complex, Costly and Confusing on Jun 18, 2019
Genetec's Synergis Cloud Link is complex, costly and confusing compared to competitor access control architectures. Inside this note, we examine...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 17, 2019
While face and fingerprint recognition are used regularly for smartphones, it is not as common in physical security. In this note, we examine...
ADT Eliminating Acquired Brands, Unifying Under 'Commercial' Brand on Jun 14, 2019
ADT is eliminating the brands of the many integrators it has acquired over the past few years, including Red Hawk, Aronson Security Group (ASG),...
Farpointe Data Conekt Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jun 13, 2019
California based Farpointe Data has been a significant OEM supplier of conventional access readers for years to companies including DMP, RS2, DSX,...
Favorite Wireless Manufacturers 2019 on Jun 12, 2019
Many wireless options exist for video surveillance but how are integrator's overall favorites? 170 integrators answered the question: What is...
Axis Will Not Block Resellers on Jun 10, 2019
While Axis generally has strong favorability amongst integrators, the biggest complaint is their channel model, which results in smaller integrator...
Dumber Techs, Bad Box Movers, Says Australian Distributor on Jun 10, 2019
Techs today are "dumber" than they used to be, despite better education and training and that makes a typical day "frustrating" for one...
OpenALPR Doubles Prices on Jun 06, 2019
There is no 'race to the bottom' in cloud / AI video surveillance. In May, Verkada increased their prices. Now, OpenALPR is doing the same with a...
"New" Arecont Fixes Failures "Without A Fight" on Jun 05, 2019
The "old" Arecont was infamous not only for its camera failures but for making their "partners" fight to get them fixed. IPVM drew the ire of...
Startup Rhombus Systems Says Twice the Features, Half the Price of Verkada on Jun 04, 2019
Closed cloud systems may be the fastest growing segment of video surveillance with Meraki and Verkada. Now another California company is joining...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Repositionable Multi-Imager Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Vivotek on Jun 19, 2019
Repositionable multi-imager cameras are one of the fastest growing segments in video surveillance, with a slew of new offerings being recently...
Genetec Synergis Cloud Link - Complex, Costly and Confusing on Jun 18, 2019
Genetec's Synergis Cloud Link is complex, costly and confusing compared to competitor access control architectures. Inside this note, we examine...
Startup Vaion Launching End-to-End AI Solution Backed with $20 Million Funding on Jun 17, 2019
An EU / USA video surveillance startup, Vaion, founded by ex-Cisco Senior Directors is launching an end-to-end VSaaS platform with $20 million in...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 17, 2019
While face and fingerprint recognition are used regularly for smartphones, it is not as common in physical security. In this note, we examine...
The Scheme Hikvision and China Importers Use To Avoid Tariffs on Jun 17, 2019
Hikvision and numerous China importers are avoiding 25% tariffs by including an SD card slot in their IP cameras to claim they are 'digital still...
Sighthound Transforms Into Enterprise AI Provider Profile on Jun 14, 2019
Sighthound is now rapidly expanding its R&D team, building an enterprise AI service. This may come as a surprise given their origins 6 years...
ADT Eliminating Acquired Brands, Unifying Under 'Commercial' Brand on Jun 14, 2019
ADT is eliminating the brands of the many integrators it has acquired over the past few years, including Red Hawk, Aronson Security Group (ASG),...
NSA Director Keynoting Dahua and Hikvision Sponsored Cybersecurity Conference [Canceled] on Jun 13, 2019
The technical director for the NSA’s Cybersecurity Threat Operations Center will be keynoting a physical security cybersecurity conference that is...
Farpointe Data Conekt Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jun 13, 2019
California based Farpointe Data has been a significant OEM supplier of conventional access readers for years to companies including DMP, RS2, DSX,...
Embattled $400 Million China Funded Philippines Surveillance System Proceeds on Jun 13, 2019
An embattled 12,000 camera surveillance system project that will cost ~$400 million will proceed.  The project contract was awarded, had its...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact