Lenel Access Control Company Profile

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Feb 23, 2016

In our 10th access company profile, we examine Lenel OnGuard access control platform:

  • Comparing Lenel to their competition
  • Examining their management and client software
  • Reviewing their product and support costs
  • Covering their hardware and wireless support
  • Explaining their video integration
  • Detailing competitive weaknesses

Lenel OnGuard Tested

For more granular detail and a full test of OnGuard, see our Lenel OnGuard Test report. Inside that report, we include screencasts and commentary on more than a dozen key OnGuard features.

Profile

OnGuard is Lenel's flagship access product, sold and supported by a global dealer channel. OnGuard's advanced features and substantial integrations are typically sold to larger, high security customers who want to integrate access with other systems, especially in manned security operations.

** ******* ****** ******* *******, ** ******* ***** ******* ****** ******* ********:

  • ********* ***** ** ***** ***********
  • ********* ***** ********** *** client ********
  • ********* ***** ******* *** support *****
  • ******** ***** ******** *** wireless *******
  • ********** ***** ***** ***********
  • ********* *********** **********

Lenel ******* ******

*** **** ******** ****** and * **** **** of *******, *** *** ***** ******* **** ******. ****** **** ******, we ******* *********** *** commentary ** **** **** * dozen *** ******* ********.

*******

********* *****'* ******** ****** *******, sold *** ********* ** a ****** ****** *******. OnGuard's ******** ******** *** substantial ************ *** ********* sold ** ******, **** security ********* *** **** to ********* ****** **** other *******, ********** ** manned ******** **********.

[***************]

*** ******* ********* ******** management *** **** ****** control, *** **** **** other ********** ******** *** building ********** ******* ********* video ************ *** *********/**** alarms. *** **** ******* version,******* *.*, ******** ***** **********/********,*********, ******* **********, ***** ************ ** ****** events, ***** **** *******, intercom/mass ************, ******** ****/ floor **** ******** *********, and ****** ****** ******** and ********* ** ******* like ******* ** ***** tracking.

Comparison *****

*** ***** ***** ********* OnGuard versus ******** *********** ***** on ****** *************** ******* like ****** ****, ******** 'openness', **** ** ***** integration, *** *** *** product ** **** ** available:

Management ********

******* **** *** **** ***** management ******** ** *** different *********. **** *** compatible **** *** **** *********** and ******* *** **** access ******* ********, *** differ ** *****-**** *********** and ****-**** *******:

*******: *** **** ******** supports **** ****** ******** like ********** **********, **** controls, *** *********** ******* to ***** ************, ********* readers, *** *********/**** *******. The ****** ****** ** to '*********' **********, ******, and ****** ******* ** a ****** ******** ******. The **** ******** ** available ** ***** ********* versions:

    • **:******** * ****** ******* 64 ******* *** * operator *******
    • ***:******** * *** ** 256 ******* *** ** clients
    • ***:******** '*********' ******* *** clients, **** ******* ** hardware ******

******* **********: *** ******* ******* essentially ******** ********, ******** OnGuard ******* **** **** distinct ********* **** *** unified ******. ** ********, live ********** ****** *** regional ******* *** ****, redundant ******* *** ******** are *********.

*** *** *********** ******* versions *** ***** ** the number ** ********* ******** servers, ********* ****** *******, and *****-****** ********** *****.  For **** ********, ********** modules **** ***** ********, visitor **********, ***** ************ and ****** *********** *** separate **** *** **** systems *** *** ********.

Platform ****

******* ** ****** ********* near the *** ******** ** similar ****** *****, *** a ****** '****' ***** can ******* **** **** individual ******* ******* *** integrations **** ***** ******* are *****.  *** ***** two **** *** ** priced ** ~$****, ********* software, *** * ***-**** controller, *** ******* **** video ************ ***********, ***** printing, *** ******** ********* database ************ *** ********** costs.

* ** **** ***, containing ********, * ****** ********** with ******** ****, ***** LNL1320 *** **** ********* modules, *** ***** ******** and ********* ***** ~$****, or ~$*** *** *******. Average **** ********** ******** ***** ranges ******* $*** - $750 ********* ** *** number ** ******* ******, but ***** **** ****** volumes. ** ****, **** do *** ******* ********** readers, ***********, ** ***** which *** *** $*** - $*** *** ******* and *** ****** ******** components ** *********** *** offerings.

*** ********* ****** ******** ******* Agreement (***) ****** **** ~$300 *** ***** ******* with *** *********** *******  to ~$**,***+ *** ********** versions. *** *********** ***-******* upgrades *** ******* ***** are ******* ** *** SUP, *** ** ** the ********** ******'* ********** to ******* ******* ******* an ***.

******* ** * ****** *******, with ** ****** ****** reselling. ******* ******* ** not ******** *********, *** can ** ***** ******** in *** ********* *** similar ********** ********. 

Clients *****

**** ******** ***** **** one ****** ******* *** one ****** *******, *** adding **** ********** ***** requires ********** ****** *****. The **** *** ****** generally ****** ******* ~$*** to ~$*,*** ********* ** base ******* *** ****** additional ******* **** ***** Designer *** **** ******** added.  **** ******* ******* two ********** ******* ********* to * ****** ******** server **** **** ** additional ~$*,*** *** ********** client. 

Wireless *******

***** ******** *** ***** third-party ******** ******* ****** offered ** ****, ********, and *****. *******, *** platform **** ******** *** wireless **** **** ******* by*****, * ********* *********** * *********** ********* in *** ** ***********, hotel, *********, *** *****-****** housing *****. 

Hardware ********

*** *** ** ******** compatible **** ******* *** L****-******* ******* **** ********* are ************ ********** ******* ********. **** 3rd-party ******** *******, **** those **** ***, ********* are **** ** ******** especially ******* ********(**: *****'* *** ******** [**** no ****** *********])

*** ********* **** *** supported ********** **** *** HID *****, ***-***** *** Edge ***, *** **** A1001 **** ***********. 

** ***** ** **************** with ***** ******* *********, Lenel **** ***** ******* firmware *** *** **** over (** ** ***** over) ** ***** ****** control ******* *** *** Mercury ********.

Reader *******

** *******, ****** ******* is ****, *** ***** supports **** ******* *******. **** ******* *********** nearly *** ********** ***, MIFARE, *** *** ******* of *** ***, **.** MHz **********. ***** **** natively ******** **** ** biometric ******* *******, ********* offerings **** ******, *******, HID ******, *********/*******, *** Stanley.

Video ***********

*************~** *** ************, ********* ********* ****:

  • *********
  • *****
  • ********
  • *****
  • *****
  • ***** ********

*****'* ***** ******* ******** its *** ***, ***, ****** ******** (*****), **** ****** ************* depending ** ******** *******.

** ***** ** *********, video ****** *** ********** as ******** ** *** access ******* ***** ******, including *********** ******* *** door ******** ******. *** default *********** *********** ****** recordings ** ** ******** by ****** ****** (**: 'forced ****') ** ** system *** ****** (**: individuals ******** **** * specific ****) ** * tight ****** *** **** in **** ***** ********* with *** ********* ** systems **** *******.

No ***** ********

***** **** *** ***** a ****** ****** ******* of *******, ******* ******* on ***** *******. ***** individual ***** *** *** to ********* ***** *** server ** ** ******** accessible ***** ** ******* web ******, ***** ** no ******* ****** ****** or ************* ******** *********.  

Remote/Web ****** *******

***** **** ***** ***-** ******* for **** ******** *** client **** ******** ******** user/cardholder **********, **** **** control, *** ***** ***********. *** users *** ******* ***** are ****** ** **** manned ******, *** ****** mobile ********* ** *** system ** ** ********* compared ** ***** ***** scale ****** ******* **** lack **, ************* ***-**********.

Integration ******** *** ****

***** *********** *** *** is *** ** ********* claim ** **** ****** control *********, *****'* ********** ******** ******* (****)****** ****** ******* *** includes **** *** ********, exceeding ********** ******** *****-****'*~** ******** ** **'*~** ********.  **** *********** ******** work **** ***** ** create **** ************ ******* and ********* ************ **** OnGuard ********* ***-*** **** exchanges, ******** *******, *** OnGuard-based ********* ********.  *** relative **** ** **** results ** * ***** integration ******* *****-******* ***** is ********* * ******* in ****** ******* ******** of ******* ****** *********.

**********

*******'* ******* ************ ** high ******** ***** ******** to ********* *** *** typical *** ****** ******* market ********. *****'* *********** integrations *** **** ******* are ****** ****** ** non ******** *** **** access *****. ** ***** terms ** ****, * Lenel **** *** ***** ~$2000+ *** ******* ***** a *******, *** ******* capable *** ******** **** Honeywell *** ***, *******, or ****** ***** ***** 25% - **% ** much. ******* ********* ****** to *****, *****-****, ****** security ***** ******* ** pay ******* ****** *** power ********. *******, *** the ******** ** ****** users, **** ********* ******* abound.

*** **** ********* *** a ***** **********, *** challenging ** ******** *** casual *****.  *** ******* 'alarm **********' ********* ****** uses ***** ** ***** windows ** ******* ******** views ** ** ****** application *********, *** *** composition ** ******* ********* is **** ****** ** turn ** *** ****. Important ******* ** ****** can ** ************* ****** if ******* ***** *** not ********** ********, *** are ********** ** *********** on *** *** ** events *****:

 

****, ******* **** ******* server-based ******** ********* ******* services **** **** ** active *** ******** ********** inside ********.  ** ******** or *** ********* ********, features *** *** ****, settings *** *** ******, and ***** *** *** lock/unlock. ** ******** ** the ************ ******** **** OnGuard ****, ***** ********* use ******* ***** ** embedded ********** ************ **** are *********** ** ****** OS *********. 

******* ********* ************ *** users: ***** **** *** restricted ************ ******* ****** dealers.  ***** ****** ******* are ****-********* ** **** global *****, ********** ** North *******, ***** *** find ******* ******* ******* to **** * *** local ******* *** **** simple ****, *******, ** upgrades. 

 

Comments (9)

Very limited dealer openings in the UK. We looked at this and got a polite email basically telling us not to bother as they had all their dealers! Needless to say I haven't got much time for them..

Don't waste your time on it. Too many excellent manufacturers out there that use the same media credentials, muster the same history reports, and offer 'reasonable priced' software or even free and warranty products even longer.

98% of customers never ask for all the bells and whistles LENEL touts as 'being top of the line'.

Ask your next access control customer what do they expect and you will agree.

Sorry LENEL but your product and 'high fluting attitude' is simply OLD HAT in 2016.

Main reason they do well in the higher end market is they are about the only one, if not the only one, that makes moving from Picture Perfect relatively easy. Don't need to run new wire to each door to run the REX and to monitor held open/forced open. Something about the number of wires used in Picture Perfect being less than what the normal system would need at the door if I recall.

So OnGuard basically can do everything Picture Perfect can do with the same amount of wires. That was huge for us. After looking at pretty much everything that is out there and having them almost all say "Oh yeah, we can do that migration from Picture Perfect no problem!" It turns out that was not true for anyone except Lenel and (I think) one other. Well unless, "no problem" means running additional wire to every door. That is not what "no problem" meant to me.....

We had so many brands pitch us and then when it got down to the nitty gritty it ended up being we would either need to run more wire or have additional power supplies by the door. Our access control guy knows much more about this than I do though so I will have him comment here and may end up deleting all of this!

This would be consistent with anybody that codes to the Mercury M5 bridge or similar product (Lenel being far from the only one).

http://www.mercury-security.com/controllers.html#m5

http://www.mercury-security.com/partners.html#platinumelite

We carry more than one line and perform "screwdriverless" conversions from Casi/GE/Picture Perfect all of the time.

Is the 'extra wire' on account of Casi's F/2F protocol reader wiring in lieu of using Wiegand?

F/2F: 3 wires; GND, TR-, TR+

Wiegand: 4 wires; GND, PWR+, Data0, Data1

Correct, but seems like there was more to it too. I will have our access control guy jump on and provide more detail. Again I recall numerous folks saying they could o it, but it always ended up with more wire on top of any of the Mercury panels.

The big difference is that F2F carries contact, REX, and reader data. Weigand is just reader data. That said, Mercury has had the ability to communicate over F2F long before they came out with the M5 bridge.

So do these comments come from how many boxes I can sell to as many small users as possible, or does it also consider how well the product works for small, medium and large scale companies. Its not just the end point bells and whistles that make the grade. Scale and type of deployment have a say as well.

I just spoke with an end user that switched from Lenel OnGuard to Honeywell Pro-Watch within 2 years and he said that he preferred the OnGuard platform. He is someone that works works with the Access Control system on a daily basis, but I don't think has any budgetary control. He felt that "just adding in a door is way easier" in OnGuard.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Nortek Mobile Access Reader BluePass Examined on Feb 12, 2019
Nortek's Linear access control division claims to make mobile credentials "more secure and easier to use than ever before" with their BluePass...
HID Launches Origo To Fix Mobile Credential Problems on Feb 05, 2019
HID is releasing Origo, an overhaul of its mobile credential platform, this time drastically restructuring the way it is priced and packaged. HID's...
Startup GateKeeper Aims For Unified Physical / Logical Access Token on Apr 04, 2019
This startup's product claims to 'Kill the Password' you use to keep your computers safe. They have already released their Gatekeeper Halberd...
OSDP Access Control Guide on Jun 04, 2019
Access control readers and controllers need to communicate. While Wiegand has been the de facto standard for decades, OSDP aims to solve major...
Farpointe Data Conekt Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jun 13, 2019
California based Farpointe Data has been a significant OEM supplier of conventional access readers for years to companies including DMP, RS2, DSX,...
Mobile Access Control Shootout - Farpointe, HID, Openpath, Nortek, Proxy on Jul 29, 2019
One of the biggest rising trends in access control is using phones as credentials but which offering is best? IPVM has tested five of the...
ProdataKey (PDK) Access Company Profile on Aug 09, 2019
Utah based ProdataKey touts low cost cloud access, wireless controllers, and no dealer required national distribution availability. But how does...
ZK Teco Atlas Access Control Tested on Aug 20, 2019
Who needs access specialists? China-based ZKTeco claims its newest access panel 'makes it very easy for anyone to learn and install access control...
Mobile Access Control Guide on Aug 28, 2019
One of the biggest trends in access for the last few years has been the marriage of mobile phones and access cards. But how does this...
Open Access Controller Guide (Axis, HID, Isonas, Mercury) on Sep 19, 2019
In the access control market, there are many software platforms, but only a few companies that make non-proprietary door controllers. Recently,...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Verkada Paying $100 For Referrals Just To Demo on Jan 22, 2020
Some companies pay for referrals when the referral becomes a customer. Verkada is taking it to the next level - paying $100 referrals fees simply...
Camera Analytics Shootout 2020 - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Jan 22, 2020
Analytics are hot again, thanks to a slew of AI-powered cameras, but whose analytics really work? And how do these new smart cameras compare to top...
Intersec 2020 Final Show Report on Jan 21, 2020
IPVM spent all 3 days at the Intersec 2020 show interviewing various companies and finding key trends. We cover: Middle East Enterprise...
Vehicle & Long Range Access Reader Tutorial on Jan 21, 2020
One of the classic challenges for access control are parking lots and garages, where the user's credential is far from the reader. With modern...
Clearview AI Alarm - NY Times Report Says "Might End Privacy" on Jan 20, 2020
Over the weekend, the NY Times released a report titled "The Secretive Company That Might End Privacy as We Know It" about a company named...
Favorite Camera Manufacturers 2020 on Jan 20, 2020
The past 2 years of US bans and sanctions have shaken the video surveillance industry but what impact would this have on integrators' favorite...
"Severely Impacted" Mercury Security 2020 Leap Year Firmware Issue on Jan 17, 2020
One of the largest access controller manufacturers has a big problem: February 29th. Mercury Security, owned by HID, is alerting partners of the...
Apple Acquires XNOR.ai, Loss For The Industry on Jan 16, 2020
Apple has acquired XNOR.ai for $200 million, reports GeekWire. This is a loss for the video surveillance industry. XNOR.ai stunned the industry...
Installation Course January 2020 - Last Chance on Jan 16, 2020
Thursday, January 16th is your last chance to register for the Winter 2020 Video Surveillance Installation Course. This is a unique installation...
Halo Smart Vape Detector Tested on Jan 16, 2020
The Halo Smart Sensor claims to detect vaping, including popular brand Juul and even THC vapes. But how well does it work in real world...