The PPF / PPM Video Surveillance Guide

By: IPVM Team, Published on Dec 23, 2016

Pixels per foot / Pixels per meter is the most fundamental and valuable, though imperfect, metric for specifying video surveillance image quality.

In a single number, this metric (e.g., 10ppf, 40ppf, 100ppf) conveys important information about what the projected quality that a camera can provide.

The image below, taken from our Camera Calculator, demonstrates examples of common pixel per foot (ppf) levels:

PPF Established Metric

PPF has become a critical established metric for several reasons:

  • Broad camera manufacturer support: Most major manufacturers use this metric.
  • Common A&E specifications: Architects and engineers who plan large projects regularly use PPF / PPM as the basis for their designs and surveillance plans.
  • Need for Something: With so many resolution options today (from 1MP to 12MP and beyond), the old metrics which used percentage of screen covered make no sense. PPF has filled this void.

The Goal of PPF

PPF is a single metric (e.g., 10, 50, 90, etc.) that when specified should deliver a specific level of quality. For example, the parking lot camera must deliver 50 PPF. Instead of guessing or just specifying more resolution, using this metric should enable selection of the ‘right’ resolution for the scene. The final image, following the PPF metric, will then deliver a predictable level of quality.

PPF Problems

Alas, PPF suffers from many problems that must be factored in:

  • Assumes even lighting and ignores the impact of bright sunlight
  • Assumes day time lighting and ignores the impact of night time / low light viewing
  • Disregards differences in lenses and compression
  • Disregards that image quality needs are subjective and debatable
  • Fails to specify related and critical metrics to complement PPF

Despite this, PPF does have value for estimation and planning. It just cannot be used blindly or simplistically. Inside the PRO Member’s section, we explain:

  • How to calculate PPF
  • How to recognize PPF limitations and make adjustments
  • How to best use PPF productively

****** *** **** / Pixels *** ***** ** the **** *********** *** valuable, ****** *********, ****** for ********** ***** ************ image *******.

** * ****** ******, this ****** (*.*., *****, 40ppf, ******) ******* ********* information ***** **** *** projected ******* **** * camera *** *******.

*** ***** *****, ***** from ********* **********, ************ ******** ** common ***** *** **** (ppf) ******:

PPF *********** ******

*** *** ****** * critical *********** ****** *** several *******:

  • ***** ****** ************ *******: **** ***** ************* use **** ******.
  • ****** *&* **************: ********** *** ********* who **** ***** ******** regularly *** *** / PPM ** *** ***** for ***** ******* *** surveillance *****.
  • **** *** *********: **** ** **** resolution ******* ***** (**** 1MP ** **** *** beyond), *** *** ******* which ************** ** ****** *********** ** *****. *** has ****** **** ****.

The **** ** ***

*** ** * ****** metric (*.*., **, **, 90, ***.) **** **** specified ****** ******* * specific ***** ** *******. For *******, *** ******* lot ****** **** ******* 50 ***. ******* ** guessing ** **** ********** more **********, ***** **** metric ****** ****** ********* of *** ‘*****’ ********** for *** *****. *** final *****, ********* *** PPF ******, **** **** deliver * *********** ***** of *******.

PPF ********

****, *** ******* **** many ******** **** **** be ******** **:

  • ******* **** ******** *** ignores *** ****** ** bright ********
  • ******* *** **** ******** and ******* *** ****** of ***** **** / low ***** *******
  • ********** *********** ** ****** and ***********
  • ********** **** ***** ******* needs *** ********** *** debatable
  • ***** ** ******* ******* and ******** ******* ** complement ***

******* ****, *** **** have ***** *** ********** and ********. ** **** cannot ** **** ******* or **************. ****** *** PRO ******’* *******, ** explain:

  • *** ** ********* ***
  • *** ** ********* *** limitations *** **** ***********
  • *** ** **** *** PPF ************

[***************]

Key ***************

**** ** ****:

  • *** ** *** **** art **** *******. *** are ******* ******** ** you ***** * ****** number *** *** ***** to ********** ********* ** complex ** ***** ******* across ********** *** ******.
  • ********** *** *** *********** of **** ** *** can ***** ********.
  • *** *** ** * baseline ** *** * sense ** ********* *********** then ****** *** ******** site ********.
  • *** *** ****** ***** guarantee ******* ****** **/*/*** in ***** ************.
  • *********** *********** *** *** proper ************.
  • ** *** ************ ** improve ********* *** ***** using **** ** **************. Instead, ******* ********** *** key ****** ********** (***, low ***** ***********, ***.)

PPF ** ***

****, ** *** *** throughout **** ******, *** sometimes *** ****** **********, Pixels *** ***** (***), is ****. *******, *** is ******** ****, **** in **** ******* ************ on *** ****** ******.

*** *********, *** ***** below ***** **** ******** PPF ****** *** **********. Note **** ******* ****** ************** ******** ****** ************, in ******** ** ******** / ***.

How ** ********* ***** *******

*********** ***** ******* ******* on *** ******/*******:

  • *** ****** ** ********** pixels ** * ***** feed/camera
  • *** ***** ** *** FoV ** *** ****** at *** ***** ** interest

Horizontal ***** *****

** ******* ** ******** identify *** ********** ***** count *** ** *** confuse ** **** *** vertical *** *** ******* resolution. *** ********, * 720p ****** *** * total ********** ** *** (technically *.***) *** *** horizontal ***** ***** ** 1280 *** *** ******** pixel ***** ** ***, more ******** ********* ** 1280 * ***. ** is *** ***** ****** in **** ****, *** 1280, **** ****** *** measuring ***.

**** *** ********** ***** counts *** ****** ***********:

**** **** ** ******** them ** **** *** quite ***********.

Selecting *** *****

*** ****** **** ** the *********** ** *** wide * ***** ** View *** ***** ** cover. *** ***** ***** shows * ****** ******** for ********* *** ***, simply ******* ****** ** the ***** ** ********, like *** **** *****:

*********** *** ***** ** the *** *** ** trickier *** ******, **** areas, **** ** ******* lots ** ******. *** instance, *** ********* ***** shows *** ********* *** widths *** ******** * parking ***/*****.

**** ** ***** **** may ** '*****', *** it ******* ** ******** factors.

  • ** ***** ******* ***** the ****?** ******* ****** ** mounted ** *** ***** of **** ***, ****** to *** **** ** the ****** *****, ** may ** ****** ** use *** ******** ***' FOV *** ************. ** there ** ** ***** coverage, *** ***' *** need ** ** ****.
  • **** ********** *********** *** there?** ****** ********* ** limited ** ***********, ** must **** **** ** mind **** ********* ****. This *** ** *** if ***** *** ***** models *** ********, ***** are ********* ******* ** 1080p. *** ** ** or **** ******* *** be ****, ***** **** are ********.

** ***** ** *** uncertainty, ** ********* ***** wider ****, ** **** you ** *** ************* your ***.

PPF *******

**** *** **** ********** the ********** ****** ** the ****** ****** *** measured **** *** *****, PPF ** ****** ********.

**** *** * *** examples:

  • *** *** ***** * 720p ****** ** ***** a ** **** **** entrance: *** = *** because ********** ***** ***** is **** *** *** Width = ** (*.*., 1280 / **).
  • *** **** * *** camera ******** * *** foot **** ******* ***: PPF = ~** ******* horizontal ***** ***** ** 2592 *** *** ***** = *** (*.*., **** / ***).
  • * ***** ****** ** monitoring * ** **** wide ******* ********: *** = ** ******* ********** pixel ***** ** **** and *** ***** = 40 (*.*., **** / 40).

PPF ********* ** *** ***** *** ******** **** ****** *********

******* ** *** **** a '******' ***. **** the *** ** ******* on *** *** *** subject ** ******** ** from *** ******. *** instance, ***** ******* ****** **********, ** *** ***** over * ******'* ***, which ***** *** ** that *****. ** *** see **** *** ********* as ** ******** *** target ** ** ***, but ******* *** ****** it ******* *********, ** 100, ***, ** *** PPF.

******* *********, *** *** level ********* ** ** widen *** ***, **** below. ******** *** ****** of *** *** *****, we *** *** *** decrease, *********** ** ***.

*** *** *** **** for ******** ** ******* ****** **********.

Fisheye ***** ** **** ******

*******, ****** ** ***** of **** ***** **** using ******* ********* ******, as *** ***** ************, much ****** **** ******** cameras.

***** *** (*) *** cameras ** ** *******, one * ******* ********* (360 ****) *** *** other ***** * ~**° HFoV. ******* *** **** to *** ** ******** 20 **** **** **** each ******:

  • **** * *** *********, at ** **** **** from *** ******, *** PPF ** ~**
  • **** * *** '************' 60° ****, ** ** feet **** **** *** camera, *** *** ** ~130

**** ** * ******* practical **********. ***** *** panoramic *** *** ** 'all' **********, ** *** direction, ** ** **** away, ****** **** **** like ***** (**** **** scenario). ** ********, *** 'conventional' **** **** ******* near ******** ******* ****** though ****** * **** narrower ****.

*** *** **************** ********* ****** *********** **** *******.

Recognizing *** ***********

**** ***** *********** ***, there *** ******* ****** which ****** *** ********* quality ** ****** *********. Below, ** ******:

  • *** ****** ** ****** lighting / **** ******* scenes
  • *** ***** / ***** time *******
  • *********** / ***** ******* setting ******
  • **** ******* ***********
  • ********** ***** ******* ************
  • ************* ******* ** ***

Wide ******* ***** ***********

*** ******* *** ****** are *** **** *** the ********* ***** *** vary *************. *** ******* to ****** ****** ********* / ******** ** * key *******. ** *** image *****, **** ******* have *** **** **********, cover *** **** *** and *** ***** ** the **** ****:

*******, *** ***** ** the ***** ***** **** it *** ***** *** PPF ***** ** *** other. ****** *** *** is *** ****, *** camera ** *** ***** has *** ******** *** more ********* ***.

**** ** ** ***** even ** ****** **** even ******** ********** ** light ******. ** *** image *****, **** * has * ***** *** than **** * *** zone * ******* ******** more ***** ****** ******* Zone * ** ** a ****** **** **** the ****** ********* ** render ***********.

*** ****** ******** ******* **** *********** ** wide ******* ***** *** these *******.

Low ***** ***********

**** ** **** ********** low *****, ** **** as ****,****** ********* **** ****************, **** ******* ***** reducing ***** *******. **** can ** **** ** the ****** ** ****** below, ******* *** ******* in *** **** **** over *** ****** ** several ***** **** *** to *****, **** ***** levels ******** ** ~*,***** on *** ****, *** under *** ** *** right.

******* *** ***** *** being '****' ** ******* standards, **** *** **** cameras ******* ***** ******* and ******* **** ***** than ****** *** ***. However, ************ *** ********** almost ***** **** **** critical ********** *****.

** *** ****** **********, we ******* ******* ***** in **** ***** *** and ***** ****** ** show **** **********, **** PPF ********* ** **** time ** ***** ****** their *******' **********.

Differences ** ***********

******* *** ********* ******* with *** ** *********** level ********. **** ** the **** ********** *** the **** ***** *** used, *** ****** ** compression *** **** *******. Below ************ ****:

** ***** **** ***** B's *** ** *** lower **** ***** *, but **** ** *** the ****. *** *** less *** **** ***** A *** **** ** not *** ****. **** images *** ***** **** the **** ******, **** the **** ********** ***** increased *********** ** ***** B.

****** ** *** ********* confusion, ************* *** **** different ******* *********** ********, as **** ** ********* terminology *** ***** ******* quality ******. ******* ****** see ***** ****** ************ *********** Comparison*** ******* ** ***** settings *** ************ *****.

***** ****** ** ******* to ***** *********** ****** and******* ************* ********* ** ***** these ******** ******. *** our***** ******* / *********** Tutorial*** **** ******* ** compression *** *** *******.

Lens ***********

**** ***** **** **** choices *** **** * huge ********** ** ***** quality, ********** ** *** pixels ********. *******, ** our *****, **** ******* is ****** * ***** concern, ******* **** ******* differences ***** *** *********** in **** ******. ***** factors, **** ***-****,******, *** ********** ************ are *** **** ****** to ****** ***** *******.

Subjective ***** *******

******* *** **** ********** element ** *** ** how ********** *** '*****' quality ***** *** **. Just ** '****** ** in *** *** ** the ********', *** ********** person *** ***** * given ******* ***** ** good ****** ** '********' a *******, *** ******* may ******* ************* **** pixels ** ****** *** required.

*** *******: * ******** wants ** ****** * human *******. ***** ** the ***** *** ****** below ** *****?

***** **** ** **** show ****** ******* *** all ** **** **** at ***** ** *******, some ***** ****** *** 18 ** ** *** images, ** **** **** more **** **** * moving '****', **** **** very ***** *******.

*** **** ********* ******** arises **** ******** ******* how **** ****** *** needed ** ******** * specific ******. ******* *** images *****:

**** ****** **** *** the ~** *** ** the **** ** *** fuzzy *** **** **** want * '*******' *****. Others **** **** ** good ******, ********** ** the ****** ** *****, such ** ** ******** or ********.

********** ** **** ** 'expert' ****** ** ******, one ***** ** ****** with *** ***** / decision ***** **** **** think ** **********.

Related / ******** *******

**** ********** *******, *** alone **** *** ******* enough *********** ** ******** select *******, ******* ** confusion ** *********. **** using ***, ******* ******* must ** ****:

  • ***** ** **** *****: ***** ************** **** to ****** *** *** the *** ***** ** be, ********* **** * PPF ******. **** *** create ********* ** **** will *** ******** ** wider **** **** ******. Instead, ************ ***** *** wide, *.*., ** *** at ** ****, ***.
  • ******** ** ******: ******* *** *** the ****** ***** ** deliver *** ***** *** impacts **** ********* ** well ** *** ***** of *** ***. ********, the ******* **** **** the ****** *** ****, the ***** *** ***.
  • ***** ** *********: *******, ********** ** the ****** ** ******, if *** ****** ****** too ******* ********** ** horizontally, *** **** **** key ******* **** ***** or ******* ***** **********. In ********* ****** ** ***** Quality****, ** ********** **** 15° ** **** ** ideal *** ****** ****** images.

FOV **** **********

******* ** ********* ** resolution ***** ********* ******* were **********, *** ********* has ****** ****** *** smaller *****. *** *******, in ***** **' **** or ****, * ***** camera **** ******* ~******, more **** ****** ****** for * **** ******* day **** *****. ** contrast, ** *** **** using ** ** ******, to *** *** **** PPF, *** ***** **** to ***** **** *** width ** * **** wide - * **% decrease.

** *** ****** **** high, *** **** ********* issues *** *********** ********* such ** *** ******'* low ***** *** *** performance. ********, ***** ******* will ***** ******* **** bright ******** *** *** light *** *** **** number ** ****** ******** a '****** *** *****'.

Larger **** **** *********

*******, ***** **-** **** wide ****, *** ********* becomes **** ********. ****** up **** ***** ** a *** ****** **** increases *** ********** ***** count ********, ~**%. ******* importantly, ********* *** ***** and *** *********** ** 5MP ******* *** ***** than ***** ****.

** ******* ***** ********** PPF *** ***** ***** as ** *** ****** problems ** *** ***. For ********, ***'* *** you **** ***** ****** a *** **** **** area. ** ** **, you **** **** **** horizontal ******. * ****** 14MP ****** *********** **** (as ** *** ~**** horizontal ******) ** ***** (2) *** *******. *** best ******** ***** ***** be (*) ***** *******. While *** ***** *** is ******** **** (****), the ******* ******* *** be ******** ** ***, low *****, ***** ****, broad ******* *******, ***.

PPF ********** ******* ** *************

**** *** **** ** mind, *** ****** ******* to ************ *** **********.********:***** ******* ****** ******, even ******** *** ** not ****** ** *** impact ** ****** ******** or **** ****** ********, which ** ****** ************.

****** **********:

  • **** ******* / *********** people *** ******* ******:************* ******* ******* ** and *** ***. **** in ***** **********, ** is ******** ** ******* solid *********** *******, ********** of ******* ******. ** contrast, *** ** ****** overkill ****** ******** ** very **** ** **** fine ******* **** ** visible, **** ** *** serial ******* ** ********.
  • ******** ******* / ****** see **** ** ****** (person, ***) ** ***** but *** *** *********** details:************* ********* ********* ******* 20 *** ** ***. This ** ****** ********* as **** ** ******** is *****.
  • *** ******* / ********* only:************* ******* * - 10 ***. ** *******, because ** **** *****, it *** ** **** hard ** **** ******* out ****** *** ******* know **** **** *** there ** ** *** are ******* *********. ** course, **** **** ******** ideal ********. *** ** all, ** *** **** less **** ** ***, you *** ****** ****** to **** *******. *******, some ********* ******* **** a *** *** ** function, ** *** ***** be ****.

[****: **** ***** *** originally ******* ** **** but *** ******* ** 2016/2017 ** ******** ******* covered *** ******* ****** examples **** *** **** Camera **********.]

Comments (11)

However, in our tests, lens quality is rarely a major concern, despite fine quality differences which are perceptible in some lenses...

Has there been a specific test of lenses and their effect on apparent PPF? Some tests have indicated that in certain cases there might be substantial differences, A Major Flaw in Long Lenses and PTZs Found.

Plus with imager pixel density increasing, lenses are needed to have higher MTF.

You raise a good point. We'll add more info about long lenses and clarify.

Great article.

Note, we use PPF throughout this report, but sometimes the metric equivalent, Pixels Per Meter (PPM), is used. However, PPF is commonly used, even in many regions standardized on the metric system.

This bias for anything non-metric forever bemuses me.

Setting aside your 'regional' comment for just a moment, there are only 3 countries in the world not using the metric system. And with no offense to Burma or Liberia, it's the USA that you are acquiescing to here. So I ask you (IPVM) to reflect on PPF versus PPM. As 'the world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally' [my emphasis on the areas in bold], who are you serving? What is the more exact measurement tool?

You say, 'PPF is commonly used, even in many regions standardized on the metric system. I wonder what you base that comment on? More importantly, if that is true, could the reason be because PPF is what we are force fed?

The US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has a very interesting paper on the subject of metric systems in the USA at https://www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/documents/pml/wmd/metric/1136a.pdf

Thanks for your consideration and Happy New Year.

James,

Our calculator has long supported metric and actually checks the country for each visitor defaulting to metric for those countries who use metric.

We will add in references to PPM values as well as PPF for all pictures / graphics after the New Year's and update the post.

James, all, we added PPM measurements to the images inside the report. Thanks.

Can anyone explain why the Horizontal Pixel count of 2592, for 5MP resolution, is less than the figure of 2688, for 4MP resolution?

This question is in reference to the table on page for of this tutorial.

Eddie, good eye.

The reason that 5MP has a lower horizontal pixel count than a 4MP camera is the difference in aspect ratios, i.e., 5MP cameras are 'taller' than 4MP ones:

5MP - 2592 x 1944

4MP - 2688 x 1520

Related - Aspect Ratio 16:9 vs 4:3 Shootout

Also, 3MP cameras have slightly greater vertical pixel count but much narrower horizontal one, i.e., 3MP - 2048 x 1536

Give a better idea of ppm.

I want to help, but I don't understand the question. Can you expand?

Clear explanation of changes in HFoV and change of PPF according to difference parameter. Great information.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Responsibility Split Selecting Locks - Statistics on Jul 22, 2019
A heated access debate surrounds who should pick and install the locks. While responsible for selecting the control systems, integrators often...
History of Video Surveillance on Jul 19, 2019
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to emerging into an AI cloud era.  The goal of this history...
New GDPR Guidelines for Video Surveillance Examined on Jul 18, 2019
The highest-level EU data protection authority has issued a new series of provisional video surveillance guidelines. While GDPR has been in...
HD Analog vs IP Guide on Jul 16, 2019
For years, HD resolution and single cable signal/power were IP camera advantages, with analog cameras limited to much lower resolution and...
Axis ARTPEC-7 P1375-E Camera Tested on Jul 12, 2019
Axis claims the new P1375-E box camera with ARTPEC-7 chip delivers "clear, sharp images in any lighting condition." But how well does it do? We...
Last Chance - Camera Course Summer 2019 on Jul 11, 2019
Last day to register is Thursday, July 11, 2019. This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Lens Focal Length Tutorial on Jul 10, 2019
3mm, 6mm, 2.8 - 9mm, 5 - 50mm, etc. Camera specifications often list lens lengths but what do they mean? These metrics are important in...
Poor OSDP Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 09, 2019
OSDP certainly offers advantages over decades-old Wiegand (see our OSDP Access Control Guide) but new IPVM statistics show that usage of OSDP, even...
First Video Surveillance GDPR Fine In France on Jul 08, 2019
The French government has imposed a sizeable fine on a small business for violating the GDPR after it constantly filmed employees without informing...
2019 Mid-Year Video Surveillance Guide on Jul 01, 2019
IPVM's new 400+ page Mid-Year Industry Guide brings all of these issues and events together in a single resource to read and review. It can be...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Responsibility Split Selecting Locks - Statistics on Jul 22, 2019
A heated access debate surrounds who should pick and install the locks. While responsible for selecting the control systems, integrators often...
Vivotek Trend Micro Cyber Security Camera App Tested on Jul 22, 2019
Vivotek and Trend Micro are claiming five million blocked attacks on IP cameras, with their jointly developed app for Vivotek cameras. This new...
Avigilon ACC7 VMS Tested on Jul 22, 2019
Avigilon's Control Center 7 boldly claims it will "transform live video monitoring" with the new Focus of Attention "AI-enabled" interface. We...
History of Video Surveillance on Jul 19, 2019
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to emerging into an AI cloud era.  The goal of this history...
Mobile Access Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 18, 2019
The ability to use mobile phones as access credentials is one of the biggest trends in a market that historically has been slow in adopting new...
New GDPR Guidelines for Video Surveillance Examined on Jul 18, 2019
The highest-level EU data protection authority has issued a new series of provisional video surveillance guidelines. While GDPR has been in...
Wyze AI Analytics Tested - Beats Axis and Hikvision on Jul 17, 2019
$20 camera disruptor Wyze has released free person detection deep learning analytics to all of their users, claiming users will "Only get notified...
Anyvision Aims For 2022 Revenue of $1 Billion on Jul 17, 2019
Only 3 video surveillance manufacturers do a billion dollars or more in annual revenue - Hikvision, Dahua, and Axis. Now, Anyvision plans to join...
HD Analog vs IP Guide on Jul 16, 2019
For years, HD resolution and single cable signal/power were IP camera advantages, with analog cameras limited to much lower resolution and...
How To Troubleshoot Wiegand Reader Problems - Inverted Wiring on Jul 16, 2019
Wiegand is the dominant method of connecting access readers, but problems can arise for installers. In fact, one of the most difficult reader...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact