Worst VMS Manufacturers 2016

By: John Honovich, Published on Feb 29, 2016

3 VMS manufacturers stood out as creating the worst problems for integrators.

150 integrators responded to our survey on their favorite and worst VMSes. With the favorites report complete, we now turn to the 3 worst.

A clear common theme emerged: companies releasing major new VMSes caused integrators lots of problems.

The Big 3

* *** ************* ***** out ** ******** *** worst ******** *** ***********.

*** *********** ********* ** our ****** ** ***** favorite *** ***** *****. With ************ ****** ********, ** *** **** to *** * *****.

* ***** ****** ***** emerged: ********* ********* ***** new ***** ****** *********** lots ** ********.

The *** *

[***************]

*** * ***** **** *** most ***** ****:

*****
*****
*****

*** ************** ** **** (1) ***** ********* *** problems **** ***** ***** before, ****** *************** ** being **** ** * competitor. ****** ** **** (2) ********* * *** VMS ** **** **** to ** ***** *** massive *********** ****** ******** to ******* **** ******** that **** ** ** 15 ***** ** ******** behind ****.

*****

***** *** *** **** frequently ***** *** *** most ********. ********* ** both ***** *** *********,***** ****** ** **** Milestone******* ****** ************** ***** *** ******. *** ***** ****** to ****** *** ****** significant ********** ********** **** before **** ****** (***: ********** / ********* ***** Between ***** ******** *.* And ******** *.*?). ** ****** ***** was **** ****** *** such * **** ***, so ***, ** ** not ******* *** ****. Integrator ********** ********:

"*****......** *** ******* ******** that *** ******** **** they ******* ** **** the ********* ******** **** used *** ****. *** "free" ******* **** ****** a ****** ** **** our ******** ****** ** pay. **** ******** ** rarely **** *** ** was **** ** **** customers ********** **** **** still **** ** *****. It ****** ****** ****** to **-**** **** ** a ********* ********** *** Milestone *** *** ***** helping ** **** **** sell"
"***** - ********* ** the *** ********* ****** is *****. *** **** to *** **** ******* and **** ****** *** license ** ***** ** review ****** ****. *** new ****** *** * limited ****** **********"
"*****. **** **** **** their *** ***** **** complicated *** ********** *** the ********** ** **** as *** *** ****. Upgrading ******** ** ***** an **** ****"
"***** - *** ** the **** ** *** release * *** ******* motion *********? ********** ** head!"
"** ** * *** of *****. **** *** release ** *.* ** was *****. ** ****** app, **** ***** ******* and ****** ***********. *.* has **** **** ************ and ** ******** ** shape ** ** ** as **** ** *.* was ** ******"
"*****. *** **** ****** with ****** ******* *** them ***** ********** **** various ****** *************"
"*****. ******** **** *** like **** *********"
"*****/********. ********* **** ********** about **** ********* **********"
"***** **.* *** *** recurring ****** **** ****** latency, ****** ******-**** ****** detection, ***. **'** ******** upgraded ** *.* ** the **** ** *** but ** ***** ******. Interesting **** ** *** problems **** ***** *** not ********* *** *** recorders *** *** **** (through ** ** *****)"

*****

***** *** *** * variety ** ********* / VMS, ********* ********** ** OEM ** *****, *** was ****** *********. *****'* newest *** ** '*****'. ** the **** ****, ** a ***** ****** ******* supplier, **** *** **** some ***** **** ***** own ***. ** *** negative ****, **** **** to **** ********** ***** it ****:

"*****. **** ** ****** and ****** ***** *******."
"***** - ***** ********** ***** and **** ****** ******"
"*** ***** *** ****** the **-***** ****** ******* VMS ********* (**** *******, Lenel ***** / ****, etc.)."
"* ***'* ****** ******** Lenel ** **** * "VMS" ** *** ****** sense ** *** **** but * **** * customer **** *** ***** access ******* *** **** wants ***** ***** ** integrate **** *** ***** application **** ***** ******** standard ** **** ** their ******** *******. ***** Video ****** ** ********. They ***'* ******* **** camera ************* ** ****** cameras ** *** ****** is ******* ** **** it **** *******"
"***** ***** ***. *** ********* had **** ***********. *** ** not ******, *********** **** down ** *** ** anytime ******* *** ******. VMS ** *** **** ******** *** complex"
"***** ***** *** *** the ***** ********* ** view ****** *** ** customer *********** ********* ** some ********** ** ***** video *******"

*****

***** *** **** **** Digital ****** **** ******. Now, ***** ** ****** towards * ********** *** VMS, ****************, **** **** ********** replace ***** ******** *****.

***** ******** ** *** 2014 ***** ** ****, so *** ******** **** integrators ********:

"** **** *** * number ** ********* **** the ***** ******* ****** NVRs ** *** **** year. ****** **** ********** failing ** * ***** period ** ****"
"***** ***** ******* ****** systems ** * **** time ********. *** ******* department ********* ********* *** PTZ ******* **** ******* 180 *******. *** ****** shows ******* ** *** DSS *** ****, ******* in ******** ** ** a ********* *****. ******* product ******* ** *** the **** ** ** used ** **."
"* **** ****** **** Digital ****** **** ***** and *** ******** **** halting *** ********* *******"
"***** ************* & ******. Tech ******* ***** ** better. *** ******* ****** isn't ******* **** ***** features, ** ** **** gets *** ******. **** don't *** ******* *** newer ***** ******* ** 5MP+ ***********. *** ******* is ****** ***** ********** and **'* **** ***** dragged *****, ***** **** can **** ** *** their ***** *** **********"
"** ********* *** ************ a ***** ***** **** Endura ******; *** ******** has **** **** ** the ******** **** **** system ** *** **** available *********. ** ******* all *** **** *** end-users ** **** ****** and ***** ******** * new ****** ******* ***** saying **** ****** *** not **** *** *** new ****** ** ****** the ****."

********** ** ********, *** still ******** ** *** core ********. *** *******, it ** **** ********* as * **** ********* for *** *** **** not ***** ******** **** until ***** **** ****. Hopefully, **** *** ******* this ****** *** **** vote *** *** *********** takes * *** ** time.

******

* ******* ******** ** *********** had ** ***** *** **********.

*** **** ***** ************ who *** *********** ***** votes *** ***** *** that *** ************** *** what **** ** ***** on *** ******** **** and *** ********* ** a **** ****** ** favorite *****. ***********, ***** is ******* ************ ******* from *** (********) *** position. *** *** ******** *** ************* **** ****** *** ****.

Comments (14)

Ross Vander Klok

IPVMU Certified | 02/29/16 06:01pm

I agree 100% with Lenel OnGuard being an issue. Very complex for operators to learn and use. It is especially difficult to add a new camera and making sure it is running as it should requires about a week of tweaking.

So yeah, it is FAR from user friendly, but waiting 18 months for a new camera to be added is the worst part.

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Ross Vander Klok | 02/29/16 06:13pm

"requires about a week of tweaking."

What needs to be tweaked specifically?

Ross Vander Klok

IPVMU Certified | In reply to John Honovich | 02/29/16 07:02pm

Motion settings mostly. Getting the pre and post roll down is different for each camera, even the same make/model. We finally went with a generic setting of 4 and 5. This way we get more footage we don't need, but we don't miss anything that way.

What requires the most work is any change we make in the system takes at least three minutes to actually take. Then we have to be sure the changes actually took (sometimes they don't), let them run for a bit, check to see what the footage looks like and then go on to the next tweak. So each change (after we set it up with our generic settings by location type) can take up to an hour. Can be a day if we need to see what the footage looks like at night as well.

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Ross Vander Klok | 02/29/16 09:29pm

That's awful...

Tony Darland

IPVMU Certified | 03/01/16 02:29pm

Sometimes if I make a change to the camera settings or resolution it will affect the motion detection zone. I do get a pop up telling me something vague to the effect of "some settings may be changed due to this action". A few times during my routine audits I've discovered the motion zone is altered or shrunk and I have to redo it. Most end users wouldn't be aware of this and might have their motion zones messed up to the point of being useless.

My assessment of OnGuard is that while it's definitely not user friendly, it's pretty good when it's working properly.

The problem is that due to the constant "little" issues that crop up all the time the system needs constant attention. Changes made here affect it over there, and the changes to fix that issue affected another issue over there. It's a constant reciprocation of issues, each predicated on the previous problem.

Undisclosed Distributor #1

03/01/16 03:47pm

Anyone has tried Milestone Arcus?

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed Distributor #1 | 03/01/16 03:52pm

Speaking of worst, Milestone Arcus VMS Tested. It's quite bad, almost shockingly so, but I do not think it registered because (1) very few integrators use it and (2) Milestone does not promote it much.

Undisclosed Distributor #1

In reply to John Honovich | 03/01/16 04:02pm

Have anyone heard that Milestone is going to stop Arcus's development?

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed Distributor #1 | 03/01/16 04:06pm

I do not know what the future plans but there has not been much in terms of new releases recently. It is a good question. I will ask Milestone the next time we talk what they plan for Arcus going forward.

Undisclosed Integrator #2

03/01/16 06:54pm

OnSSI 5.0 was bad .. Not having motion detection with a release is a sin.. The system however has ..potential.. You can see that it is coming together nicely. Version 5.1 is a step in the right direction but not there yet. The administrator interface on the recorder while different than 4.x is actually better in some ways. The VMS and CLient software interfaces are the exact same OnSSI has been using for a few years.

We are however moving toward NVR-based systems. While we dropped NVR appliances in favor of PC-based "recorders" ... For our customers/applications, NVRs serve them better. On top of that the lack of archiving from most VMS is to me a serious issue. To think about archiving usually requires the most expensive license from many VMS.. Much easier to archive and re-play with NVRs.

Undisclosed #3

03/01/16 07:26pm

These favorite/worst lists are always my favorite to read. I'd be curious to see what the breakdown is on the data is. Is this mostly coming from end-users or integrators? New installs vs legacy. integrator vs end-user. An end-user might not like a VMS for a different reason than an integrator.

Was this survey post the 5.1 release of Ocularis? 5.0 was bad...real bad, however 5.1 has many of the bugs worked out and is actually pretty solid.

Keep'em coming!

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed #3 | 03/01/16 07:29pm

The survey was just integrators and the reason being is that the average integrator has experience with many more lines than the average end user.

This survey was run on January 9 / 10, 2016, which was after 5.1 was released.

Carlos Espinoza

03/01/16 08:03pm

No one complains about March Networks VMS?

Ronen Atsil

04/18/16 01:40pm

Version 5.1 solved many issues that occurs in version 5.0 and for me the reality ranking place for OnSSI is definitely in the top favorites VMS and not here...

Login to read this IPVM report.

Why do I need to log in?

IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Bosch Budget 3000i Cameras Tested on Dec 05, 2019

Bosch has long had a hole in its lineup for, as it describes, "competitively-priced cameras". Now, Bosch has released its 3000i series cameras...

AVTech ~$70 IP Cameras Tested Vs Dahua and Hikvision on Dec 04, 2019

Taiwanese manufacturer Avtech is taking direct aim at low cost leaders Dahua and Hikvision with ~$70 starlight and white light illuminator...

Access Startup Multi-Mount Aims To Streamline Reader Installs on Dec 03, 2019

Startup Multi-Mount claims it makes installing access readers 'Fast', 'Secure,' and fit 'any size frame.' The company states its bracket 'fits most...

Directory of Access Reader Manufacturers on Nov 27, 2019

Credential Readers are one of the most visible and noticeable parts of access systems, but installers often stick with only the brand they always...

Vunetrix Health Monitoring Company Profile on Nov 26, 2019

Vunetrix boasts that they make the integrators the 'HERO' by using Vunetrix's monitoring. We spoke to Vunetrix to better understand their...

Top 2020 Trend - AI Analytics on Nov 22, 2019

170+ Integrators answered: What do you think will be the top industry trend in 2020? Why? For the 4th year in a row, AI/video analytics was...

Glass Doors and Access Control Tutorial on Nov 21, 2019

One of the biggest access challenges are locking and securing glass doors. Unlike wood or steel doors that can be modified to work with...

ISC East 2019 Show Report on Nov 21, 2019

IPVM has finished in New York City covering both days of the ISC East 2019 show. Here is a 6+ minute general walkthrough: Inside this report,...

Avigilon H4 Intercom Tested on Nov 20, 2019

Avigilon is well-known for video surveillance and access, but how well does the company's intercom work? We purchased and tested Avigilon's H4...

Top Manufacturers Gaining and Losing 2019 on Nov 18, 2019

2019 has been an explosive year for video surveillance, with the world's two largest manufacturers, Dahua and Hikvision, being sanctioned for human...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Bosch Budget 3000i Cameras Tested on Dec 05, 2019

Bosch has long had a hole in its lineup for, as it describes, "competitively-priced cameras". Now, Bosch has released its 3000i series cameras...

Anixter Resisting Takeover From Competitor on Dec 05, 2019

Mega distributor Anixter is going to be acquired but by whom? Initially, Anixter planned to go private, being bought by a private equity firm....

Security Sales Course 2020 - Last Chance Save $50 on Dec 05, 2019

This sales course is customized for the current needs and challenges specific to professionals selling video surveillance and access control...

Ireland National Children's Hospital Chooses Hikvision End-to-End With Facial Recognition on Dec 05, 2019

The world's most expensive hospital project ever, the New Children's Hospital in Ireland, has chosen an all-Hikvision surveillance system including...

AVTech ~$70 IP Cameras Tested Vs Dahua and Hikvision on Dec 04, 2019

Taiwanese manufacturer Avtech is taking direct aim at low cost leaders Dahua and Hikvision with ~$70 starlight and white light illuminator...

Ultinous European Analytics Startup Company Profile on Dec 04, 2019

European analytics-startup Ultinous pitches customers to "Have your own video analysis service!" We spoke to Ultinous to better understand their...

Access Startup Multi-Mount Aims To Streamline Reader Installs on Dec 03, 2019

Startup Multi-Mount claims it makes installing access readers 'Fast', 'Secure,' and fit 'any size frame.' The company states its bracket 'fits most...