Worst VMS Manufacturers 2016

By John Honovich, Published on Feb 29, 2016

3 VMS manufacturers stood out as creating the worst problems for integrators.

150 integrators responded to our survey on their favorite and worst VMSes. With the favorites report complete, we now turn to the 3 worst.

A clear common theme emerged: companies releasing major new VMSes caused integrators lots of problems.

The Big 3

*** * ***** **** *** most ***** ****:

  • *****
  • *****
  • *****

*** ************** ** **** (1) ***** ********* *** problems **** ***** ***** before, ****** *************** ** being **** ** * competitor. ****** ** **** (2) ********* * *** VMS ** **** **** to ** ***** *** massive *********** ****** ******** to ******* **** ******** that **** ** ** 15 ***** ** ******** behind ****.

*****

***** *** *** **** frequently ***** *** *** most ********. ********* ** both ***** *** *********,***** ****** ** **** Milestone******* ****** ************** ***** *** ******. *** ***** ****** to ****** *** ****** significant ********** ********** **** before **** ****** (***: ********** / ********* ***** Between ***** ******** *.* And ******** *.*?). ** ****** ***** was **** ****** *** such * **** ***, so ***, ** ** not ******* *** ****. Integrator ********** ********:

  • "*****......** *** ******* ******** that *** ******** **** they ******* ** **** the ********* ******** **** used *** ****. *** "free" ******* **** ****** a ****** ** **** our ******** ****** ** pay. **** ******** ** rarely **** *** ** was **** ** **** customers ********** **** **** still **** ** *****. It ****** ****** ****** to **-**** **** ** a ********* ********** *** Milestone *** *** ***** helping ** **** **** sell"
  • "***** - ********* ** the *** ********* ****** is *****. *** **** to *** **** ******* and **** ****** *** license ** ***** ** review ****** ****. *** new ****** *** * limited ****** **********"
  • "*****. **** **** **** their *** ***** **** complicated *** ********** *** the ********** ** **** as *** *** ****. Upgrading ******** ** ***** an **** ****"
  • "***** - *** ** the **** ** *** release * *** ******* motion *********? ********** ** head!"
  • "** ** * *** of *****. **** *** release ** *.* ** was *****. ** ****** app, **** ***** ******* and ****** ***********. *.* has **** **** ************ and ** ******** ** shape ** ** ** as **** ** *.* was ** ******"
  • "*****. *** **** ****** with ****** ******* *** them ***** ********** **** various ****** *************"
  • "*****. ******** **** *** like **** *********"
  • "*****/********. ********* **** ********** about **** ********* **********"
  • "***** **.* *** *** recurring ****** **** ****** latency, ****** ******-**** ****** detection, ***. **'** ******** upgraded ** *.* ** the **** ** *** but ** ***** ******. Interesting **** ** *** problems **** ***** *** not ********* *** *** recorders *** *** **** (through ** ** *****)"

*****

***** *** *** * variety ** ********* / VMS, ********* ********** ** OEM ** *****, *** was ****** *********. *****'* newest *** ** '*****'. ** the **** ****, ** a ***** ****** ******* supplier, **** *** **** some ***** **** ***** own ***. ** *** negative ****, **** **** to **** ********** ***** it ****:

  • "*****. **** ** ****** and ****** ***** *******."
  • "***** - ***** ********** ***** and **** ****** ******"
  • "*** ***** *** ****** the **-***** ****** ******* VMS ********* (**** *******, Lenel ***** / ****, etc.)."
  • "* ***'* ****** ******** Lenel ** **** * "VMS" ** *** ****** sense ** *** **** but * **** * customer **** *** ***** access ******* *** **** wants ***** ***** ** integrate **** *** ***** application **** ***** ******** standard ** **** ** their ******** *******. ***** Video ****** ** ********. They ***'* ******* **** camera ************* ** ****** cameras ** *** ****** is ******* ** **** it **** *******"
  • "***** ***** ***. *** ********* had **** ***********. *** ** not ******, *********** **** down ** *** ** anytime ******* *** ******. VMS ** *** **** ******** *** complex"
  • "***** ***** *** *** the ***** ********* ** view ****** *** ** customer *********** ********* ** some ********** ** ***** video *******"

*****

***** *** **** **** Digital ****** **** ******. Now, ***** ** ****** towards * ********** *** VMS, ****************, **** **** ********** replace ***** ******** *****.

***** ******** ** *** 2014 ***** ** ****, so *** ******** **** integrators ********:

  • "** **** *** * number ** ********* **** the ***** ******* ****** NVRs ** *** **** year. ****** **** ********** failing ** * ***** period ** ****"
  • "***** ***** ******* ****** systems ** * **** time ********. *** ******* department ********* ********* *** PTZ ******* **** ******* 180 *******. *** ****** shows ******* ** *** DSS *** ****, ******* in ******** ** ** a ********* *****. ******* product ******* ** *** the **** ** ** used ** **."
  • "* **** ****** **** Digital ****** **** ***** and *** ******** **** halting *** ********* *******"
  • "***** ************* & ******. Tech ******* ***** ** better. *** ******* ****** isn't ******* **** ***** features, ** ** **** gets *** ******. **** don't *** ******* *** newer ***** ******* ** 5MP+ ***********. *** ******* is ****** ***** ********** and **'* **** ***** dragged *****, ***** **** can **** ** *** their ***** *** **********"
  • "** ********* *** ************ a ***** ***** **** Endura ******; *** ******** has **** **** ** the ******** **** **** system ** *** **** available *********. ** ******* all *** **** *** end-users ** **** ****** and ***** ******** * new ****** ******* ***** saying **** ****** *** not **** *** *** new ****** ** ****** the ****."

********** ** ********, *** still ******** ** *** core ********. *** *******, it ** **** ********* as * **** ********* for *** *** **** not ***** ******** **** until ***** **** ****. Hopefully, **** *** ******* this ****** *** **** vote *** *** *********** takes * *** ** time.

******

* ******* ******** ** *********** had ** ***** *** **********.

*** **** ***** ************ who *** *********** ***** votes *** ***** *** that *** ************** *** what **** ** ***** on *** ******** **** and *** ********* ** a **** ****** ** favorite *****. ***********, ***** is ******* ************ ******* from *** (********) *** position. *** *** ******** *** ************* **** ****** *** ****.

Comments (14)

Avatar

Ross Vander Klok

IPVMU Certified | 02/29/16 06:01pm

I agree 100% with Lenel OnGuard being an issue. Very complex for operators to learn and use. It is especially difficult to add a new camera and making sure it is running as it should requires about a week of tweaking.

So yeah, it is FAR from user friendly, but waiting 18 months for a new camera to be added is the worst part.

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Ross Vander Klok | 02/29/16 06:13pm

"requires about a week of tweaking."

What needs to be tweaked specifically?

Avatar

Ross Vander Klok

IPVMU Certified | In reply to John Honovich | 02/29/16 07:02pm

Motion settings mostly. Getting the pre and post roll down is different for each camera, even the same make/model. We finally went with a generic setting of 4 and 5. This way we get more footage we don't need, but we don't miss anything that way.

What requires the most work is any change we make in the system takes at least three minutes to actually take. Then we have to be sure the changes actually took (sometimes they don't), let them run for a bit, check to see what the footage looks like and then go on to the next tweak. So each change (after we set it up with our generic settings by location type) can take up to an hour. Can be a day if we need to see what the footage looks like at night as well.

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Ross Vander Klok | 02/29/16 09:29pm

That's awful...

Avatar

Tony Darland

IPVMU Certified | 03/01/16 02:29pm

Sometimes if I make a change to the camera settings or resolution it will affect the motion detection zone. I do get a pop up telling me something vague to the effect of "some settings may be changed due to this action". A few times during my routine audits I've discovered the motion zone is altered or shrunk and I have to redo it. Most end users wouldn't be aware of this and might have their motion zones messed up to the point of being useless.

My assessment of OnGuard is that while it's definitely not user friendly, it's pretty good when it's working properly.

The problem is that due to the constant "little" issues that crop up all the time the system needs constant attention. Changes made here affect it over there, and the changes to fix that issue affected another issue over there. It's a constant reciprocation of issues, each predicated on the previous problem.

Undisclosed Distributor #1

03/01/16 03:47pm

Anyone has tried Milestone Arcus?

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed Distributor #1 | 03/01/16 03:52pm

Speaking of worst, Milestone Arcus VMS Tested. It's quite bad, almost shockingly so, but I do not think it registered because (1) very few integrators use it and (2) Milestone does not promote it much.

Undisclosed Distributor #1

In reply to John Honovich | 03/01/16 04:02pm

Have anyone heard that Milestone is going to stop Arcus's development?

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed Distributor #1 | 03/01/16 04:06pm

I do not know what the future plans but there has not been much in terms of new releases recently. It is a good question. I will ask Milestone the next time we talk what they plan for Arcus going forward.

Undisclosed Integrator #2

03/01/16 06:54pm

OnSSI 5.0 was bad .. Not having motion detection with a release is a sin.. The system however has ..potential.. You can see that it is coming together nicely. Version 5.1 is a step in the right direction but not there yet. The administrator interface on the recorder while different than 4.x is actually better in some ways. The VMS and CLient software interfaces are the exact same OnSSI has been using for a few years.

We are however moving toward NVR-based systems. While we dropped NVR appliances in favor of PC-based "recorders" ... For our customers/applications, NVRs serve them better. On top of that the lack of archiving from most VMS is to me a serious issue. To think about archiving usually requires the most expensive license from many VMS.. Much easier to archive and re-play with NVRs.

Undisclosed #3

03/01/16 07:26pm

These favorite/worst lists are always my favorite to read. I'd be curious to see what the breakdown is on the data is. Is this mostly coming from end-users or integrators? New installs vs legacy. integrator vs end-user. An end-user might not like a VMS for a different reason than an integrator.

Was this survey post the 5.1 release of Ocularis? 5.0 was bad...real bad, however 5.1 has many of the bugs worked out and is actually pretty solid.

Keep'em coming!

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed #3 | 03/01/16 07:29pm

The survey was just integrators and the reason being is that the average integrator has experience with many more lines than the average end user.

This survey was run on January 9 / 10, 2016, which was after 5.1 was released.

Carlos Espinoza

03/01/16 08:03pm

No one complains about March Networks VMS?

Ronen Atsil

04/18/16 01:40pm

Version 5.1 solved many issues that occurs in version 5.0 and for me the reality ranking place for OnSSI is definitely in the top favorites VMS and not here...

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,594 reports, 889 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Worst Manufacturer Technical Support 2020 on Oct 15, 2020
4 manufacturers stood out as providing the worst technical support to ~200...
Worst Camera Manufacturers 2020 on May 06, 2020
Which camera manufacturer have integrators had the worst experience with in...
Bottom: Integrators Start To Stand Vs Coronavirus on Apr 20, 2020
Good news - IPVM integrator statistics show that while coronavirus has hit...
Top Video Surveillance Service Call Problems 2020 on Oct 23, 2020
3 primary and 4 secondary issues stood out as causing the most problems when...
Coronavirus Hits Manufacturers, Standing Now, Worse To Come on Apr 06, 2020
Coronavirus is hitting security manufacturers, though overall modestly for...
Infinova, March Networks and Swann H1 2020 Financials Examined on Sep 02, 2020
While Dahua and Hikvision, helped by fever camera sales, are recovering from...
Verkada: "IPVM Should Never Be Your Source of News" on Jul 02, 2020
Verkada was unhappy with IPVM's recent coverage declaring that reading IPVM...
Dahua, Hikvision, ZKTeco Face Mask Detection Shootout on Jun 19, 2020
Temperature tablets with face mask detection are one of the hottest trends in...
False: Verkada: "If You Want To Remote View Your Cameras You Need To Punch Holes In Your Firewall" on Jul 31, 2020
Verkada falsely declared to “3,000+ customers”, “300 school districts”, and...
Worst Access Control Manufacturers 2020 on Sep 30, 2020
200+ Integrators told IPVM "In the past year, what access control...
ADT: 'Fever' Cameras Are Medical Devices on Jun 15, 2020
While many manufacturers are avoiding admitting their 'fever' cameras are...
Favorite Video Surveillance Hard Drive Manufacturer 2020 on Aug 27, 2020
Western Digital and Seagate effectively have a duopoly in hard drives but...
Worst Over But Integrators Still Dealing With Coronavirus Problems (June Statistics) on Jun 30, 2020
While numbers of integrators very impacted by Coronavirus continue to drop,...
Favorite Access Control Manufacturers 2020 on Sep 28, 2020
200+ Integrators told IPVM "What is your favorite access control management...
The NOT Outstanding Security Equipment Manufacturer 2020 on Oct 02, 2020
The "OSPAs" promised to be credible, transparent, and respectable. They have...

Recent Reports

VICE Investigates Verkada's Harassing "RawVerkadawgz" on Oct 26, 2020
This month, IPVM investigated Verkada's sexism, discrimination, and cultural...
Six Flags' FDA Violating Outdoor Dahua Fever Cameras on Oct 26, 2020
As Six Flags scrambled to reopen parks amid plummeting revenues caused by the...
ISC Brasil Digital Experience 2020 Report on Oct 23, 2020
ISC Brasil 2020 rebranded itself to ISC Digital Experience and, like its...
Top Video Surveillance Service Call Problems 2020 on Oct 23, 2020
3 primary and 4 secondary issues stood out as causing the most problems when...
GDPR Impact On Temperature / Fever Screening Explained on Oct 22, 2020
What impact does GDPR have on temperature screening? Do you risk a GDPR fine...
Security And Safety Things (S&ST) Tested on Oct 22, 2020
S&ST, a Bosch spinout, is spending tens of millions of dollars aiming to...
Nokia Fever Screening Claims To "Advance Fight Against COVID-19" on Oct 22, 2020
First IBM, then briefly Clorox, and now Nokia becomes the latest Fortune 500...
Deceptive Meridian Temperature Tablets Endanger Public Safety on Oct 21, 2020
IPVM's testing of and investigation into Meridian Kiosk's temperature...
Honeywell 30 Series and Vivotek NVRs Tested on Oct 21, 2020
The NDAA ban has driven many users to look for low-cost NVRs not made by...
Ubiquiti Access Control Tested on Oct 21, 2020
Ubiquiti has become one of the most widely used wireless and switch providers...
Avigilon Aggressive Trade-In Program Takes Aim At Competitors on Oct 20, 2020
Avigilon has launched one of the most aggressive trade-in programs the video...
Mexico Video Surveillance Market Overview 2020 on Oct 20, 2020
Despite being neighbors, there are key differences between the U.S. and...
Dahua Revenue Grows But Profits Down, Cause Unclear on Oct 20, 2020
While Dahua's overall revenue was up more than 12% in Q3 2020, a significant...
Illegal Hikvision Fever Screening Touted In Australia, Government Investigating, Temperature References Deleted on Oct 20, 2020
The Australian government told IPVM that they are investigating a Hikvision...
Panasonic Presents i-PRO Cameras and Video Analytics on Oct 19, 2020
Panasonic i-PRO presented its X-Series cameras and AI video analytics at the...