Worst VMS Manufacturers 2016

Author: John Honovich, Published on Feb 29, 2016

3 VMS manufacturers stood out as creating the worst problems for integrators.

150 integrators responded to our survey on their favorite and worst VMSes. With the favorites report complete, we now turn to the 3 worst.

A clear common theme emerged: companies releasing major new VMSes caused integrators lots of problems.

The Big 3

* *** ************* ***** *** ** ******** *** ***** ******** for ***********.

*** *********** ********* ** *** ****** ** ***** ******** *** worst *****. **** ************ ****** ********, ** *** **** ** *** * *****.

* ***** ****** ***** *******: ********* ********* ***** *** ***** caused *********** **** ** ********.

The *** *

[***************]

*** * ***** **** *** **** ***** ****:

  • *****
  • *****
  • *****

*** ************** ** **** (*) ***** ********* *** ******** **** their ***** ******, ****** *************** ** ***** **** ** * competitor. ****** ** **** (*) ********* * *** *** ** very **** ** ** ***** *** ******* *********** ****** ******** to ******* **** ******** **** **** ** ** ** ***** of ******** ****** ****.

*****

***** *** *** **** ********** ***** *** *** **** ********. According ** **** ***** *** *********,***** ****** ** **** **************** ****** ************** ***** *** ******. *** ***** ****** ** ****** *** ****** *********** ********** complaints **** ****** **** ****** (***:********** / ********* ***** ******* ***** ******** *.* *** ******** 5.X?). ** ****** ***** *** **** ****** *** **** * move ***, ** ***, ** ** *** ******* *** ****. Integrator ********** ********:

  • "*****......** *** ******* ******** **** *** ******** **** **** ******* to **** *** ********* ******** **** **** *** ****. *** "free" ******* **** ****** * ****** ** **** *** ******** wanted ** ***. **** ******** ** ****** **** *** ** was **** ** **** ********* ********** **** **** ***** **** us *****. ** ****** ****** ****** ** **-**** **** ** a ********* ********** *** ********* *** *** ***** ******* ** with **** ****"
  • "***** - ********* ** *** *** ********* ****** ** *****. you **** ** *** **** ******* *** **** ****** *** license ** ***** ** ****** ****** ****. *** *** ****** has * ******* ****** **********"
  • "*****. **** **** **** ***** *** ***** **** *********** *** cumbersome *** *** ********** ** **** ** *** *** ****. Upgrading ******** ** ***** ** **** ****"
  • "***** - *** ** *** **** ** *** ******* * VMS ******* ****** *********? ********** ** ****!"
  • "** ** * *** ** *****. **** *** ******* ** 5.0 ** *** *****. ** ****** ***, **** ***** ******* and ****** ***********. *.* *** **** **** ************ *** ** starting ** ***** ** ** ** ** **** ** *.* was ** ******"
  • "*****. *** **** ****** **** ****** ******* *** **** ***** compatible **** ******* ****** *************"
  • "*****. ******** **** *** **** **** *********"
  • "*****/********. ********* **** ********** ***** **** ********* **********"
  • "***** **.* *** *** ********* ****** **** ****** *******, ****** server-side ****** *********, ***. **'** ******** ******** ** *.* ** the **** ** *** *** ** ***** ******. *********** **** we *** ******** **** ***** *** *** ********* *** *** recorders *** *** **** (******* ** ** *****)"

*****

***** *** *** * ******* ** ********* / ***, ********* previously ** *** ** *****, *** *** ****** *********. *****'* newest *** ** '*****'. ** *** **** ****, ** * major ****** ******* ********, **** *** **** **** ***** **** their *** ***. ** *** ******** ****, **** **** ** have ********** ***** ** ****:

  • "*****. **** ** ****** *** ****** ***** *******."
  • "***** - ***** ********** ***** *** **** ****** ******"
  • "*** ***** *** ****** *** **-***** ****** ******* *** ********* (Amag *******, ***** ***** / ****, ***.)."
  • "* ***'* ****** ******** ***** ** **** * "***" ** the ****** ***** ** *** **** *** * **** * customer **** *** ***** ****** ******* *** **** ***** ***** video ** ********* **** *** ***** *********** **** ***** ******** standard ** **** ** ***** ******** *******. ***** ***** ****** is ********. **** ***'* ******* **** ****** ************* ** ****** cameras ** *** ****** ** ******* ** **** ** **** support"
  • "***** ***** ***. *** ********* *** **** ***********. *** ** not ******, *********** **** **** ** *** ** ******* ******* any ******. *** ** *** **** ******** *** *******"
  • "***** ***** *** *** *** ***** ********* ** **** ****** not ** ******** *********** ********* ** **** ********** ** ***** video *******"

*****

***** *** **** **** ******* ****** **** ******. ***, ***** is ****** ******* * ********** *** ***, ****************, **** **** ********** ******* ***** ******** *****.

***** ******** ** *** **** ***** ** ****, ** *** problems **** *********** ********:

  • "** **** *** * ****** ** ********* **** *** ***** Digital ****** **** ** *** **** ****. ****** **** ********** failing ** * ***** ****** ** ****"
  • "***** ***** ******* ****** ******* ** * **** **** ********. Our ******* ********** ********* ********* *** *** ******* **** ******* 180 *******. *** ****** ***** ******* ** *** *** *** page, ******* ** ******** ** ** * ********* *****. ******* product ******* ** *** *** **** ** ** **** ** be."
  • "* **** ****** **** ******* ****** **** ***** *** *** problems **** ******* *** ********* *******"
  • "***** ************* & ******. **** ******* ***** ** ******. *** product ****** ***'* ******* **** ***** ********, ** ** **** gets *** ******. **** ***'* *** ******* *** ***** ***** cameras ** ***+ ***********. *** ******* ** ****** ***** ********** and **'* **** ***** ******* *****, ***** **** *** **** it *** ***** ***** *** **********"
  • "** ********* *** ************ * ***** ***** **** ****** ******; the ******** *** **** **** ** *** ******** **** **** system ** *** **** ********* *********. ** ******* *** *** team *** ***-***** ** **** ****** *** ***** ******** * new ****** ******* ***** ****** **** ****** *** *** **** and *** *** ****** ** ****** *** ****."

********** ** ********, *** ***** ******** ** *** **** ********. For *******, ** ** **** ********* ** * **** ********* for *** *** **** *** ***** ******** **** ***** ***** this ****. *********, **** *** ******* **** ****** *** **** vote *** *** *********** ***** * *** ** ****.

******

* ******* ******** ** *********** *** ** ***** *** **********.

*** **** ***** ************ *** *** *********** ***** ***** *** Exacq *** **** *** ************** *** **** **** ** ***** on *** ******** **** *** *** ********* ** * **** number ** ******** *****. ***********, ***** ** ******* ************ ******* from *** (********) *** ********. *** *********** *** ************* ********** *** ****.

Comments (14)

I agree 100% with Lenel OnGuard being an issue. Very complex for operators to learn and use. It is especially difficult to add a new camera and making sure it is running as it should requires about a week of tweaking.

So yeah, it is FAR from user friendly, but waiting 18 months for a new camera to be added is the worst part.

"requires about a week of tweaking."

What needs to be tweaked specifically?

Motion settings mostly. Getting the pre and post roll down is different for each camera, even the same make/model. We finally went with a generic setting of 4 and 5. This way we get more footage we don't need, but we don't miss anything that way.

What requires the most work is any change we make in the system takes at least three minutes to actually take. Then we have to be sure the changes actually took (sometimes they don't), let them run for a bit, check to see what the footage looks like and then go on to the next tweak. So each change (after we set it up with our generic settings by location type) can take up to an hour. Can be a day if we need to see what the footage looks like at night as well.

That's awful...

Sometimes if I make a change to the camera settings or resolution it will affect the motion detection zone. I do get a pop up telling me something vague to the effect of "some settings may be changed due to this action". A few times during my routine audits I've discovered the motion zone is altered or shrunk and I have to redo it. Most end users wouldn't be aware of this and might have their motion zones messed up to the point of being useless.

My assessment of OnGuard is that while it's definitely not user friendly, it's pretty good when it's working properly.

The problem is that due to the constant "little" issues that crop up all the time the system needs constant attention. Changes made here affect it over there, and the changes to fix that issue affected another issue over there. It's a constant reciprocation of issues, each predicated on the previous problem.

Anyone has tried Milestone Arcus?

Speaking of worst, Milestone Arcus VMS Tested. It's quite bad, almost shockingly so, but I do not think it registered because (1) very few integrators use it and (2) Milestone does not promote it much.

Have anyone heard that Milestone is going to stop Arcus's development?

I do not know what the future plans but there has not been much in terms of new releases recently. It is a good question. I will ask Milestone the next time we talk what they plan for Arcus going forward.

OnSSI 5.0 was bad .. Not having motion detection with a release is a sin.. The system however has ..potential.. You can see that it is coming together nicely. Version 5.1 is a step in the right direction but not there yet. The administrator interface on the recorder while different than 4.x is actually better in some ways. The VMS and CLient software interfaces are the exact same OnSSI has been using for a few years.

We are however moving toward NVR-based systems. While we dropped NVR appliances in favor of PC-based "recorders" ... For our customers/applications, NVRs serve them better. On top of that the lack of archiving from most VMS is to me a serious issue. To think about archiving usually requires the most expensive license from many VMS.. Much easier to archive and re-play with NVRs.

These favorite/worst lists are always my favorite to read. I'd be curious to see what the breakdown is on the data is. Is this mostly coming from end-users or integrators? New installs vs legacy. integrator vs end-user. An end-user might not like a VMS for a different reason than an integrator.

Was this survey post the 5.1 release of Ocularis? 5.0 was bad...real bad, however 5.1 has many of the bugs worked out and is actually pretty solid.

Keep'em coming!

The survey was just integrators and the reason being is that the average integrator has experience with many more lines than the average end user.

This survey was run on January 9 / 10, 2016, which was after 5.1 was released.

No one complains about March Networks VMS?

Version 5.1 solved many issues that occurs in version 5.0 and for me the reality ranking place for OnSSI is definitely in the top favorites VMS and not here...

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

ISC East 2018 Mini-Show Final Report on Nov 16, 2018
This is our second and final show report from ISC West. ISC East, by its own admission, is not a national or international show, billed as the...
Directory of Video Intercoms on Nov 13, 2018
Video Intercoms, also known as Video Door-Phones or Video Entry Systems, have been growing in the past decade as more and more IP camera...
Beware Amazon Go Store Hype (Tested) on Nov 13, 2018
IPVM's trip to and testing of Amazon Go's San Francisco store shows a number of significant operational and economic issues that undermine the...
Magos Radar Company Profile on Nov 12, 2018
Magos America General Manager Yaron Zussman admits when he first came across Magos, he asked himself: "What's innovative about radar?" Be that as...
Video Surveillance Hard Drive Size Statistics 2018 on Nov 08, 2018
What is the most common hard drive size for video surveillance? 150+ integrators answered: What size hard drive do you most commonly use? What...
Axis 2N Intercom Tested on Nov 08, 2018
Axis expanded its video intercom business buying Czech-based 2N in 2016. Despite competing against owner Axis' intercoms, 2N recently registered as...
Haven Targets School Security with Lockdown Lineup on Nov 08, 2018
Haven, a US startup founded in 2014 as a residential-focused company, has now raised funding and is offering a lineup of commercial grade locks for...
Dahua Dual Imager Dome Camera Tested (HDBW4231FN-E2-M) on Nov 07, 2018
Dahua has introduced a dual-imager dome model, the HDBW4231FN-E2-M, with two independently positionable sensors including integrated IR, not found...
Directory Of Video Doorbells on Nov 06, 2018
Video doorbells are one of the fastest growing categories in video surveillance, especially among residences. The optimal placement of these...
Avigilon Opens Up Analytics And Cameras on Nov 06, 2018
Avigilon is opening up. The company historically famous for advocating its own end-to-end solutions and making it harder for 3rd parties to...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Throughtek P2P/Cloud Solution Profile on Nov 15, 2018
Many IoT manufacturers either do not have the capabilities or the interest to develop their own cloud management software for their devices....
ASIS Offering Custom Research For Manufacturers on Nov 15, 2018
Manufacturers often want to know what industry people think about trends and, in particular, the segments and product they offer.  ASIS and its...
ISC East 2018 Mini-Show Report on Nov 15, 2018
ISC East, by its own admission, is not a national or international show, billed as the "Largest Annual Northeast U.S. Security...
Hikvision Silent on "Bad Architectural Practices" Cybersecurity Report on Nov 14, 2018
A 'significant vulnerability was found in Hikvision cameras' by VDOO, a startup cybersecurity specialist. Hikvision has fixed the specific...
French Government Threatens School with $1.7M Fine For “Excessive Video Surveillance” on Nov 14, 2018
The French government has notified a high-profile Paris coding academy that it risks a fine of up to 1.5 million euros (about $1.7m) if it...
Integrator Credit Card Alternative Divvy on Nov 13, 2018
Most security integrators are small businesses but large enough that they have various employees that need to be able to expense various charges as...
Directory of Video Intercoms on Nov 13, 2018
Video Intercoms, also known as Video Door-Phones or Video Entry Systems, have been growing in the past decade as more and more IP camera...
Beware Amazon Go Store Hype (Tested) on Nov 13, 2018
IPVM's trip to and testing of Amazon Go's San Francisco store shows a number of significant operational and economic issues that undermine the...
Magos Radar Company Profile on Nov 12, 2018
Magos America General Manager Yaron Zussman admits when he first came across Magos, he asked himself: "What's innovative about radar?" Be that as...
Genetec Privacy Protector Tested on Nov 12, 2018
Genetec has built Kiwi Security's Privacy Protector into Security Center, an analytic which anonymizes individuals in cameras' fields of view...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact