Worst VMS Manufacturers 2016

Author: John Honovich, Published on Feb 29, 2016

3 VMS manufacturers stood out as creating the worst problems for integrators.

150 integrators responded to our survey on their favorite and worst VMSes. With the favorites report complete, we now turn to the 3 worst.

A clear common theme emerged: companies releasing major new VMSes caused integrators lots of problems.

The Big 3

* *** ************* ***** *** ** ******** *** ***** ******** for ***********.

*** *********** ********* ** *** ****** ** ***** ******** *** worst *****. **** ************ ****** ********, ** *** **** ** *** * *****.

* ***** ****** ***** *******: ********* ********* ***** *** ***** caused *********** **** ** ********.

The *** *

[***************]

*** * ***** **** *** **** ***** ****:

  • *****
  • *****
  • *****

*** ************** ** **** (*) ***** ********* *** ******** **** their ***** ******, ****** *************** ** ***** **** ** * competitor. ****** ** **** (*) ********* * *** *** ** very **** ** ** ***** *** ******* *********** ****** ******** to ******* **** ******** **** **** ** ** ** ***** of ******** ****** ****.

*****

***** *** *** **** ********** ***** *** *** **** ********. According ** **** ***** *** *********,***** ****** ** **** **************** ****** ************** ***** *** ******. *** ***** ****** ** ****** *** ****** *********** ********** complaints **** ****** **** ****** (***:********** / ********* ***** ******* ***** ******** *.* *** ******** 5.X?). ** ****** ***** *** **** ****** *** **** * move ***, ** ***, ** ** *** ******* *** ****. Integrator ********** ********:

  • "*****......** *** ******* ******** **** *** ******** **** **** ******* to **** *** ********* ******** **** **** *** ****. *** "free" ******* **** ****** * ****** ** **** *** ******** wanted ** ***. **** ******** ** ****** **** *** ** was **** ** **** ********* ********** **** **** ***** **** us *****. ** ****** ****** ****** ** **-**** **** ** a ********* ********** *** ********* *** *** ***** ******* ** with **** ****"
  • "***** - ********* ** *** *** ********* ****** ** *****. you **** ** *** **** ******* *** **** ****** *** license ** ***** ** ****** ****** ****. *** *** ****** has * ******* ****** **********"
  • "*****. **** **** **** ***** *** ***** **** *********** *** cumbersome *** *** ********** ** **** ** *** *** ****. Upgrading ******** ** ***** ** **** ****"
  • "***** - *** ** *** **** ** *** ******* * VMS ******* ****** *********? ********** ** ****!"
  • "** ** * *** ** *****. **** *** ******* ** 5.0 ** *** *****. ** ****** ***, **** ***** ******* and ****** ***********. *.* *** **** **** ************ *** ** starting ** ***** ** ** ** ** **** ** *.* was ** ******"
  • "*****. *** **** ****** **** ****** ******* *** **** ***** compatible **** ******* ****** *************"
  • "*****. ******** **** *** **** **** *********"
  • "*****/********. ********* **** ********** ***** **** ********* **********"
  • "***** **.* *** *** ********* ****** **** ****** *******, ****** server-side ****** *********, ***. **'** ******** ******** ** *.* ** the **** ** *** *** ** ***** ******. *********** **** we *** ******** **** ***** *** *** ********* *** *** recorders *** *** **** (******* ** ** *****)"

*****

***** *** *** * ******* ** ********* / ***, ********* previously ** *** ** *****, *** *** ****** *********. *****'* newest *** ** '*****'. ** *** **** ****, ** * major ****** ******* ********, **** *** **** **** ***** **** their *** ***. ** *** ******** ****, **** **** ** have ********** ***** ** ****:

  • "*****. **** ** ****** *** ****** ***** *******."
  • "***** - ***** ********** ***** *** **** ****** ******"
  • "*** ***** *** ****** *** **-***** ****** ******* *** ********* (Amag *******, ***** ***** / ****, ***.)."
  • "* ***'* ****** ******** ***** ** **** * "***" ** the ****** ***** ** *** **** *** * **** * customer **** *** ***** ****** ******* *** **** ***** ***** video ** ********* **** *** ***** *********** **** ***** ******** standard ** **** ** ***** ******** *******. ***** ***** ****** is ********. **** ***'* ******* **** ****** ************* ** ****** cameras ** *** ****** ** ******* ** **** ** **** support"
  • "***** ***** ***. *** ********* *** **** ***********. *** ** not ******, *********** **** **** ** *** ** ******* ******* any ******. *** ** *** **** ******** *** *******"
  • "***** ***** *** *** *** ***** ********* ** **** ****** not ** ******** *********** ********* ** **** ********** ** ***** video *******"

*****

***** *** **** **** ******* ****** **** ******. ***, ***** is ****** ******* * ********** *** ***, ****************, **** **** ********** ******* ***** ******** *****.

***** ******** ** *** **** ***** ** ****, ** *** problems **** *********** ********:

  • "** **** *** * ****** ** ********* **** *** ***** Digital ****** **** ** *** **** ****. ****** **** ********** failing ** * ***** ****** ** ****"
  • "***** ***** ******* ****** ******* ** * **** **** ********. Our ******* ********** ********* ********* *** *** ******* **** ******* 180 *******. *** ****** ***** ******* ** *** *** *** page, ******* ** ******** ** ** * ********* *****. ******* product ******* ** *** *** **** ** ** **** ** be."
  • "* **** ****** **** ******* ****** **** ***** *** *** problems **** ******* *** ********* *******"
  • "***** ************* & ******. **** ******* ***** ** ******. *** product ****** ***'* ******* **** ***** ********, ** ** **** gets *** ******. **** ***'* *** ******* *** ***** ***** cameras ** ***+ ***********. *** ******* ** ****** ***** ********** and **'* **** ***** ******* *****, ***** **** *** **** it *** ***** ***** *** **********"
  • "** ********* *** ************ * ***** ***** **** ****** ******; the ******** *** **** **** ** *** ******** **** **** system ** *** **** ********* *********. ** ******* *** *** team *** ***-***** ** **** ****** *** ***** ******** * new ****** ******* ***** ****** **** ****** *** *** **** and *** *** ****** ** ****** *** ****."

********** ** ********, *** ***** ******** ** *** **** ********. For *******, ** ** **** ********* ** * **** ********* for *** *** **** *** ***** ******** **** ***** ***** this ****. *********, **** *** ******* **** ****** *** **** vote *** *** *********** ***** * *** ** ****.

******

* ******* ******** ** *********** *** ** ***** *** **********.

*** **** ***** ************ *** *** *********** ***** ***** *** Exacq *** **** *** ************** *** **** **** ** ***** on *** ******** **** *** *** ********* ** * **** number ** ******** *****. ***********, ***** ** ******* ************ ******* from *** (********) *** ********. *** *********** *** ************* ********** *** ****.

Comments (14)

I agree 100% with Lenel OnGuard being an issue. Very complex for operators to learn and use. It is especially difficult to add a new camera and making sure it is running as it should requires about a week of tweaking.

So yeah, it is FAR from user friendly, but waiting 18 months for a new camera to be added is the worst part.

"requires about a week of tweaking."

What needs to be tweaked specifically?

Motion settings mostly. Getting the pre and post roll down is different for each camera, even the same make/model. We finally went with a generic setting of 4 and 5. This way we get more footage we don't need, but we don't miss anything that way.

What requires the most work is any change we make in the system takes at least three minutes to actually take. Then we have to be sure the changes actually took (sometimes they don't), let them run for a bit, check to see what the footage looks like and then go on to the next tweak. So each change (after we set it up with our generic settings by location type) can take up to an hour. Can be a day if we need to see what the footage looks like at night as well.

That's awful...

Sometimes if I make a change to the camera settings or resolution it will affect the motion detection zone. I do get a pop up telling me something vague to the effect of "some settings may be changed due to this action". A few times during my routine audits I've discovered the motion zone is altered or shrunk and I have to redo it. Most end users wouldn't be aware of this and might have their motion zones messed up to the point of being useless.

My assessment of OnGuard is that while it's definitely not user friendly, it's pretty good when it's working properly.

The problem is that due to the constant "little" issues that crop up all the time the system needs constant attention. Changes made here affect it over there, and the changes to fix that issue affected another issue over there. It's a constant reciprocation of issues, each predicated on the previous problem.

Anyone has tried Milestone Arcus?

Speaking of worst, Milestone Arcus VMS Tested. It's quite bad, almost shockingly so, but I do not think it registered because (1) very few integrators use it and (2) Milestone does not promote it much.

Have anyone heard that Milestone is going to stop Arcus's development?

I do not know what the future plans but there has not been much in terms of new releases recently. It is a good question. I will ask Milestone the next time we talk what they plan for Arcus going forward.

OnSSI 5.0 was bad .. Not having motion detection with a release is a sin.. The system however has ..potential.. You can see that it is coming together nicely. Version 5.1 is a step in the right direction but not there yet. The administrator interface on the recorder while different than 4.x is actually better in some ways. The VMS and CLient software interfaces are the exact same OnSSI has been using for a few years.

We are however moving toward NVR-based systems. While we dropped NVR appliances in favor of PC-based "recorders" ... For our customers/applications, NVRs serve them better. On top of that the lack of archiving from most VMS is to me a serious issue. To think about archiving usually requires the most expensive license from many VMS.. Much easier to archive and re-play with NVRs.

These favorite/worst lists are always my favorite to read. I'd be curious to see what the breakdown is on the data is. Is this mostly coming from end-users or integrators? New installs vs legacy. integrator vs end-user. An end-user might not like a VMS for a different reason than an integrator.

Was this survey post the 5.1 release of Ocularis? 5.0 was bad...real bad, however 5.1 has many of the bugs worked out and is actually pretty solid.

Keep'em coming!

The survey was just integrators and the reason being is that the average integrator has experience with many more lines than the average end user.

This survey was run on January 9 / 10, 2016, which was after 5.1 was released.

No one complains about March Networks VMS?

Version 5.1 solved many issues that occurs in version 5.0 and for me the reality ranking place for OnSSI is definitely in the top favorites VMS and not here...

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

UTC, Owner of Lenel, Acquires S2 on Sep 20, 2018
UTC now owns two of the biggest access control providers, one of integrator's most hated access control platforms, Lenel, and one of their...
Favorite Request-to-Exit (RTE) Manufacturers 2018 on Sep 19, 2018
Request To Exit devices like motion sensors and lock releasing push-buttons are a part of almost every access install, but who makes the equipment...
Favorite Intercom Manufacturers 2018 on Sep 14, 2018
Intercoms are certainly increasing in popularity, driven by the integration of video and IP networking. But who is the favorite? On the one side,...
VMS Export Shootout - Avigilon, Dahua, Exacq, Genetec, Hikvision, Milestone on Sep 13, 2018
When crimes, accidents or problems occur, exporting video from one's video surveillance system is critical to proving incidents. But who does it...
Door Fundamentals For Access Control Guide on Sep 12, 2018
Assuming every door can be secured with either a maglock or an electric strike can be a painful assumption in the field. While those items can be...
Dahua Low-Cost 4MP Camera Tested (N44CL52) on Sep 10, 2018
4MP use continues to increase, especially in low-cost models, according to integrators in our 2018 Resolution Usage Statistics. We bought Dahua's...
Stanley Security Acquires 3xLogic, Kushner Becomes Product President on Sep 10, 2018
Stanley Security acquired 3xLogic a few months ago. However, the company has still not officially publicly announced it, leading many to wonder...
Access Control Course Fall 2018 on Sep 06, 2018
Registration IS CLOSED ends this Thursday. Register now. If you are looking to strengthen your ability to design and deploy access systems or...
Dell Launches IoT for Surveillance on Sep 05, 2018
Historically, Dell has been a PC and server provider (e.g., "Dude, you're getting a Dell") and widely used for surveillance storage. However, in...
Drain Wire For Access Control Reader Tutorial on Sep 04, 2018
An easy-to-miss cabling specification plays a key role in access control, yet it is commonly ignored. The drain wire offers protection for readers...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Alexa Guard Expands Amazon's Security Offerings, Boosts ADT's Stock on Sep 21, 2018
Amazon is expanding their security offerings yet again, this time with Alexa Guard that delivers security audio analytics and a virtual "Fake...
UTC, Owner of Lenel, Acquires S2 on Sep 20, 2018
UTC now owns two of the biggest access control providers, one of integrator's most hated access control platforms, Lenel, and one of their...
BluePoint Aims To Bring Life-Safety Mind-Set To Police Pull Stations on Sep 20, 2018
Fire alarm pull stations are commonplace but police ones are not. A self-funded startup, BluePoint Alert Solutions is aiming to make police pull...
SIA Plays Dumb On OEMs And Hikua Ban on Sep 20, 2018
OEMs widely pretend to be 'manufacturers', deceiving their customers and putting them at risk for cybersecurity attacks and, soon, violation of US...
Axis Vs. Hikvision IR PTZ Shootout on Sep 20, 2018
Hikvision has their high-end dual-sensor DarkfighterX. Axis has their high-end concealed IR Q6125-LE. Which is better? We bought both and tested...
Avigilon Announces AI-Powered H5 Camera Development on Sep 19, 2018
Avigilon will be showcasing "next-generation AI" at next week's ASIS GSX. In an atypical move, the company is not actually releasing these...
Favorite Request-to-Exit (RTE) Manufacturers 2018 on Sep 19, 2018
Request To Exit devices like motion sensors and lock releasing push-buttons are a part of almost every access install, but who makes the equipment...
25% China Tariffs Finalized For 2019, 10% Start Now, Includes Select Video Surveillance on Sep 18, 2018
A surprise move: In July, when the most recent tariff round was first announced, the tariffs were only scheduled for 10%. However, now, the US...
Central Stations Face Off Against NFPA On Fire Monitoring on Sep 18, 2018
Central stations are facing off against the NFPA over what they call anti-competitive language in NFPA 72, the standard that covers fire alarms....
Hikvision USA Starts Layoffs on Sep 18, 2018
Hikvision USA has started layoffs, just weeks after the US government ban was passed into law. Inside this note, we examine: The important...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact