Worst VMS Manufacturers 2016

By: John Honovich, Published on Feb 29, 2016

3 VMS manufacturers stood out as creating the worst problems for integrators.

150 integrators responded to our survey on their favorite and worst VMSes. With the favorites report complete, we now turn to the 3 worst.

A clear common theme emerged: companies releasing major new VMSes caused integrators lots of problems.

The Big 3

* *** ************* ***** out ** ******** *** worst ******** *** ***********.

*** *********** ********* ** our ****** ** ***** favorite *** ***** *****. With ************ ****** ********, ** *** **** to *** * *****.

* ***** ****** ***** emerged: ********* ********* ***** new ***** ****** *********** lots ** ********.

The *** *

[***************]

*** * ***** **** *** most ***** ****:

  • *****
  • *****
  • *****

*** ************** ** **** (1) ***** ********* *** problems **** ***** ***** before, ****** *************** ** being **** ** * competitor. ****** ** **** (2) ********* * *** VMS ** **** **** to ** ***** *** massive *********** ****** ******** to ******* **** ******** that **** ** ** 15 ***** ** ******** behind ****.

*****

***** *** *** **** frequently ***** *** *** most ********. ********* ** both ***** *** *********,***** ****** ** **** Milestone******* ****** ************** ***** *** ******. *** ***** ****** to ****** *** ****** significant ********** ********** **** before **** ****** (***: ********** / ********* ***** Between ***** ******** *.* And ******** *.*?). ** ****** ***** was **** ****** *** such * **** ***, so ***, ** ** not ******* *** ****. Integrator ********** ********:

  • "*****......** *** ******* ******** that *** ******** **** they ******* ** **** the ********* ******** **** used *** ****. *** "free" ******* **** ****** a ****** ** **** our ******** ****** ** pay. **** ******** ** rarely **** *** ** was **** ** **** customers ********** **** **** still **** ** *****. It ****** ****** ****** to **-**** **** ** a ********* ********** *** Milestone *** *** ***** helping ** **** **** sell"
  • "***** - ********* ** the *** ********* ****** is *****. *** **** to *** **** ******* and **** ****** *** license ** ***** ** review ****** ****. *** new ****** *** * limited ****** **********"
  • "*****. **** **** **** their *** ***** **** complicated *** ********** *** the ********** ** **** as *** *** ****. Upgrading ******** ** ***** an **** ****"
  • "***** - *** ** the **** ** *** release * *** ******* motion *********? ********** ** head!"
  • "** ** * *** of *****. **** *** release ** *.* ** was *****. ** ****** app, **** ***** ******* and ****** ***********. *.* has **** **** ************ and ** ******** ** shape ** ** ** as **** ** *.* was ** ******"
  • "*****. *** **** ****** with ****** ******* *** them ***** ********** **** various ****** *************"
  • "*****. ******** **** *** like **** *********"
  • "*****/********. ********* **** ********** about **** ********* **********"
  • "***** **.* *** *** recurring ****** **** ****** latency, ****** ******-**** ****** detection, ***. **'** ******** upgraded ** *.* ** the **** ** *** but ** ***** ******. Interesting **** ** *** problems **** ***** *** not ********* *** *** recorders *** *** **** (through ** ** *****)"

*****

***** *** *** * variety ** ********* / VMS, ********* ********** ** OEM ** *****, *** was ****** *********. *****'* newest *** ** '*****'. ** the **** ****, ** a ***** ****** ******* supplier, **** *** **** some ***** **** ***** own ***. ** *** negative ****, **** **** to **** ********** ***** it ****:

  • "*****. **** ** ****** and ****** ***** *******."
  • "***** - ***** ********** ***** and **** ****** ******"
  • "*** ***** *** ****** the **-***** ****** ******* VMS ********* (**** *******, Lenel ***** / ****, etc.)."
  • "* ***'* ****** ******** Lenel ** **** * "VMS" ** *** ****** sense ** *** **** but * **** * customer **** *** ***** access ******* *** **** wants ***** ***** ** integrate **** *** ***** application **** ***** ******** standard ** **** ** their ******** *******. ***** Video ****** ** ********. They ***'* ******* **** camera ************* ** ****** cameras ** *** ****** is ******* ** **** it **** *******"
  • "***** ***** ***. *** ********* had **** ***********. *** ** not ******, *********** **** down ** *** ** anytime ******* *** ******. VMS ** *** **** ******** *** complex"
  • "***** ***** *** *** the ***** ********* ** view ****** *** ** customer *********** ********* ** some ********** ** ***** video *******"

*****

***** *** **** **** Digital ****** **** ******. Now, ***** ** ****** towards * ********** *** VMS, ****************, **** **** ********** replace ***** ******** *****.

***** ******** ** *** 2014 ***** ** ****, so *** ******** **** integrators ********:

  • "** **** *** * number ** ********* **** the ***** ******* ****** NVRs ** *** **** year. ****** **** ********** failing ** * ***** period ** ****"
  • "***** ***** ******* ****** systems ** * **** time ********. *** ******* department ********* ********* *** PTZ ******* **** ******* 180 *******. *** ****** shows ******* ** *** DSS *** ****, ******* in ******** ** ** a ********* *****. ******* product ******* ** *** the **** ** ** used ** **."
  • "* **** ****** **** Digital ****** **** ***** and *** ******** **** halting *** ********* *******"
  • "***** ************* & ******. Tech ******* ***** ** better. *** ******* ****** isn't ******* **** ***** features, ** ** **** gets *** ******. **** don't *** ******* *** newer ***** ******* ** 5MP+ ***********. *** ******* is ****** ***** ********** and **'* **** ***** dragged *****, ***** **** can **** ** *** their ***** *** **********"
  • "** ********* *** ************ a ***** ***** **** Endura ******; *** ******** has **** **** ** the ******** **** **** system ** *** **** available *********. ** ******* all *** **** *** end-users ** **** ****** and ***** ******** * new ****** ******* ***** saying **** ****** *** not **** *** *** new ****** ** ****** the ****."

********** ** ********, *** still ******** ** *** core ********. *** *******, it ** **** ********* as * **** ********* for *** *** **** not ***** ******** **** until ***** **** ****. Hopefully, **** *** ******* this ****** *** **** vote *** *** *********** takes * *** ** time.

******

* ******* ******** ** *********** had ** ***** *** **********.

*** **** ***** ************ who *** *********** ***** votes *** ***** *** that *** ************** *** what **** ** ***** on *** ******** **** and *** ********* ** a **** ****** ** favorite *****. ***********, ***** is ******* ************ ******* from *** (********) *** position. *** *** ******** *** ************* **** ****** *** ****.

Comments (14)

I agree 100% with Lenel OnGuard being an issue. Very complex for operators to learn and use. It is especially difficult to add a new camera and making sure it is running as it should requires about a week of tweaking.

So yeah, it is FAR from user friendly, but waiting 18 months for a new camera to be added is the worst part.

"requires about a week of tweaking."

What needs to be tweaked specifically?

Motion settings mostly. Getting the pre and post roll down is different for each camera, even the same make/model. We finally went with a generic setting of 4 and 5. This way we get more footage we don't need, but we don't miss anything that way.

What requires the most work is any change we make in the system takes at least three minutes to actually take. Then we have to be sure the changes actually took (sometimes they don't), let them run for a bit, check to see what the footage looks like and then go on to the next tweak. So each change (after we set it up with our generic settings by location type) can take up to an hour. Can be a day if we need to see what the footage looks like at night as well.

That's awful...

Sometimes if I make a change to the camera settings or resolution it will affect the motion detection zone. I do get a pop up telling me something vague to the effect of "some settings may be changed due to this action". A few times during my routine audits I've discovered the motion zone is altered or shrunk and I have to redo it. Most end users wouldn't be aware of this and might have their motion zones messed up to the point of being useless.

My assessment of OnGuard is that while it's definitely not user friendly, it's pretty good when it's working properly.

The problem is that due to the constant "little" issues that crop up all the time the system needs constant attention. Changes made here affect it over there, and the changes to fix that issue affected another issue over there. It's a constant reciprocation of issues, each predicated on the previous problem.

Anyone has tried Milestone Arcus?

Speaking of worst, Milestone Arcus VMS Tested. It's quite bad, almost shockingly so, but I do not think it registered because (1) very few integrators use it and (2) Milestone does not promote it much.

Have anyone heard that Milestone is going to stop Arcus's development?

I do not know what the future plans but there has not been much in terms of new releases recently. It is a good question. I will ask Milestone the next time we talk what they plan for Arcus going forward.

OnSSI 5.0 was bad .. Not having motion detection with a release is a sin.. The system however has ..potential.. You can see that it is coming together nicely. Version 5.1 is a step in the right direction but not there yet. The administrator interface on the recorder while different than 4.x is actually better in some ways. The VMS and CLient software interfaces are the exact same OnSSI has been using for a few years.

We are however moving toward NVR-based systems. While we dropped NVR appliances in favor of PC-based "recorders" ... For our customers/applications, NVRs serve them better. On top of that the lack of archiving from most VMS is to me a serious issue. To think about archiving usually requires the most expensive license from many VMS.. Much easier to archive and re-play with NVRs.

These favorite/worst lists are always my favorite to read. I'd be curious to see what the breakdown is on the data is. Is this mostly coming from end-users or integrators? New installs vs legacy. integrator vs end-user. An end-user might not like a VMS for a different reason than an integrator.

Was this survey post the 5.1 release of Ocularis? 5.0 was bad...real bad, however 5.1 has many of the bugs worked out and is actually pretty solid.

Keep'em coming!

The survey was just integrators and the reason being is that the average integrator has experience with many more lines than the average end user.

This survey was run on January 9 / 10, 2016, which was after 5.1 was released.

No one complains about March Networks VMS?

Version 5.1 solved many issues that occurs in version 5.0 and for me the reality ranking place for OnSSI is definitely in the top favorites VMS and not here...

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Security Integrators Outlook On Remaining Integrators In 2025 on Aug 22, 2019
The industry has changed substantially in the last decade, with the rise of IP cameras and the race to the bottom. Indeed, more changes may be...
Anyvision Facial Recognition Tested on Aug 21, 2019
Anyvision is aiming for $1 billion in revenue by 2022, backed by $74 million in funding. But does their performance live up to the hype they have...
Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...
ZK Teco Atlas Access Control Tested on Aug 20, 2019
Who needs access specialists? China-based ZKTeco claims its newest access panel 'makes it very easy for anyone to learn and install access control...
Suprema Biometric Mass Leak Examined on Aug 19, 2019
While Suprema is rarely discussed even within the physical security market, the South Korean biometrics manufacturer made global news this past...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Aug 13, 2019
Biometrics are commonly used in phones, but how frequently are they used for access? 150+ integrators told us how often they use biometrics,...
US Government Ban of Dahua, Hikvision, Huawei Takes Effect Now on Aug 13, 2019
The 'prohibition on use or procurement' of Dahua, Hikvision and Huawei products and 'essential components' take effect today, August 13, 2019, one...
Proactive CCTV "Only Affordable Video Archiving Solution" Profile on Aug 12, 2019
Proactive CCTV is claiming to offer "the only affordable video archiving solution on the market", reducing the storage typically required for H.265...
Milestone "GDPR-ready" Certification Claim Critiqued on Aug 12, 2019
Milestone is touting that its latest XProtect VMS is "GDPR-ready" with a 'European Privacy Seal'. However, our investigation raises significant...
ProdataKey (PDK) Access Company Profile on Aug 09, 2019
 Utah based ProdataKey touts low cost cloud access, wireless controllers, and no dealer required national distribution availability.  But how does...

Most Recent Industry Reports

TMA Apologizes to Amazon / Ring on Aug 23, 2019
Not only is Amazon / Ring making major incursions into the residential security market, the organization representing the biggest incumbents, The...
China Dahua Replaces Their Software With US Pepper on Aug 22, 2019
What does a US government banned company do to improve its security positioning in the US? Well, Dahua is unveiling a novel solution, partnering...
Security Integrators Outlook On Remaining Integrators In 2025 on Aug 22, 2019
The industry has changed substantially in the last decade, with the rise of IP cameras and the race to the bottom. Indeed, more changes may be...
First GDPR Facial Recognition Fine For Sweden School on Aug 22, 2019
A school in Sweden has been fined $20,000 for using facial recognition to keep attendance in what is Sweden's first GDPR fine. Notably, the fine is...
Anyvision Facial Recognition Tested on Aug 21, 2019
Anyvision is aiming for $1 billion in revenue by 2022, backed by $74 million in funding. But does their performance live up to the hype they have...
JCI Sues Wyze on Aug 21, 2019
The mega manufacturer / integrator JCI has sued the fast-growing $20 camera Seattle startup Wyze. Inside this note: Share the court...
Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...
ZK Teco Atlas Access Control Tested on Aug 20, 2019
Who needs access specialists? China-based ZKTeco claims its newest access panel 'makes it very easy for anyone to learn and install access control...
Uniview Beats Intel In Trademark Lawsuit on Aug 19, 2019
Uniview has won a long-running trademark lawsuit brought by Intel, with Beijing's highest court reversing an earlier Intel win, centered on...
Suprema Biometric Mass Leak Examined on Aug 19, 2019
While Suprema is rarely discussed even within the physical security market, the South Korean biometrics manufacturer made global news this past...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact