Vivotek 12MP IR Multi-Imager Tested

By Ethan Ace, Published on Aug 09, 2016

A key weakness of multi-imager cameras is poor low light.

While integrated IR has become dominant in cameras overall, it is still uncommon in multi-imager cameras.

But now, Vivotek has released the MS8391-EV, a 12MP multi imager model touting 30m integrated IR, one of the first cameras to include it.

We tested this new model to see how it performed against multi-imagers from Axis (Q3709-PVE) and Pelco (Optera) in full light and low light, checking image quality, infrared illumination performance, bitrates, and more.

The image below overviews the Vivotek, with competitive comparisons inside.

*******

** *** *****, *** Vivotek ******-** ********* ****, with *** ***** *********** beyond *** ***** *****-****** model ** **** ****** due ** *** *****-** IR, *** **** ***** images ******* ** *** Pelco ******. 

*** ******'* ***** ** IR ****** ****, ******** its ********* *** ***** while adjusting ** ****** ************ *** still ********* **** *********** subjects. ****, *** ******* *** of ****** ** *** ***** interference **** ****** *******. **** that ******* ****** * special ******** ** *** non-pulsed **** **** ** to ****** **** *****, though **** ******* ***** by ~**%.

*** ******'* *** ** a ****** ******** ******** image ******* ** ******** individual ******* ***** *********** simpler *** *********** **** useful, ****** *** **** wide ****** ***** *** be ******* ** ******** 2x2, ***, ***. *******.

*******, *** ******'* ******** were ***** **** ***** models ****** ** **** light, ****** ****** ** low *****. *******, ***** cameras ****** *** *** provide ****** ****** ** low *****. 

*******

*** ******-** ***** ***~$*,*** *** ******, ****** ******** ***** than other *****-****** *******, **** as ******** *************** *************(**** ~$****-****).

Physical ********

*** ****** ** ** unusual **** ******, ******* to * ******, ****** larger *** **** ****-******. We **** * **** at *** ******** ******** of *** ****** ** this *****:


******** ** ***** *****-****** cameras, *** ****** ** much ******* **** *** Axis *****, **** *** central "****" ******* (***** imagers/IR *** *******) ******** smaller **** *** ***** Optera.

*** ****** ** ******* in **** ** ******* bullet *******, **** ** the ******** ** ****** seen ****:

*************

************* ** *** ****** is ******* ** **** other ******* *******, **** the ******** ** **** specific *****-****** ********, ********* sensor *********, ******* ** per-imager ********. ** ****** these ******* ** **** video:

Stitched ******** ******* ****

****** **** ***** ****** cameras, *** ******* *****-****** outputs * ****** ******** stream, ********* (~**.* *********). **** makes ********** ******** *******, as ***** ** *** need ** ****** ******** streams ** * ******. 

*******, ******* ** **'* super **** ****** *****, viewing **** ****** ** standard ******* (***, ***, etc.) *** ** *******, as ** ******* **** small ** *** *** entire ***** (*****). ***** ****** consider ******** * ****** layout **** * **** tile *** *** ******* camera ** ****** ****, a ******* ******* ** many *****.

Pulsed **

*** ****** **** ****** infrared ************, ****** *** vast ******** ** ** cameras, **** *****. **** is ********* **** ** specialized *******, **** ** license ***** *******, *** not ******* *** ******. Vivotek **** ******* *** IR ****** **** ** reduce ****** *********** (***** the **** *** *** on **** ****) *** heat *********, ** **** as ******** *****.

****** ** **** *** cause ****** **** ***** in *** ******* ****** itself, ** *** ***** is ************ **** *** camera's *********. *******, ** adjacent *******, *** ******'* pulsed ** ******* ** flashing, **** *****. ** some ******* ** ****** the ** *** ****** to ******* ******** *** deactivate. 

******* **** ********* ******** the ****** **** ***** cameras *** ******* * special ******** ***** ***** the ******'* **** ** full ****, *** **** ******* IR ***** ** ~**%.

IR *****

*** ****** ******* *** specified *** ** ***** in *** *****, ****** *** full ***° ***. 

** **** *******, *** ******* walks **** ***** ***/***' to *** ****** ********, becoming ******* *********** ** ~30m/100'.

Smart **

*** ****** ****** "***** IR", ** ****, ********* to ******* ************/******* ** subjects **** *** ******. We ***** **** **** worked ********** **** ** our *****, ****** ************ was ***** ******* **** near *** ******. ** the ******* *****, *** image ** **** ****** **** as ***** ** ******* as *** ******* ******* the ***** ** ****.

FoV / ******** **********

** ******** ***** ******* of *** ******** ** an ******* *****, ***** and ***, ** **** *** Pelco ***** ****** ******. The **** ******** ***** of **** *** *** cameras ** ***** *****. Notice *** **** ***** ** far ****** *** ** its *:* ****** ***** and *** ** ***** imagers ******* ** ****.

Image ******* ***********

*** ***** ***********

*** ******* ** ***** imager ****** *** ** far *** **** *** light *********** ** ******* in **** *****. ** ~20' **** *** ****** (~105 ***), ***** ******* of *** ******* *** captured, *** *-* ***** of *** **** *****. By ********, *** **** and ***** ***** ****** cameras ******* ** ****** details ** **** ***** level. 

****** ******* **** *** camera (********* ~** ***), no ******* ** *** subject *** ********, *** he ** ****** *******, while ***** *** **** by *** ***** ******* tested.

*******, ** ~***' *** subject ** ***** ****** visible ** *** ******* camera, *** *** ******.

 

** **** *****, *** Vivotek ****** ******** ****** similar ** ** ******** better **** *** ***** camera, ***** *** ****** PPF ** *** **** Q3709 ******** *-* ********** legible ***** ** *** test ***** (****** ** increase ** ********* ****** details).

****** *******, ******* *** Pelco ***** ******* ******* details ** *** *******, though ******* ******** **** legible ***** ** *** test *****. *** **** camera ** ****** ******* here.

*******, ** ~***' ******** (~30 ***), *** ******* camera ******** *** ******* line ** **** *** vague ******* *******, ***** the ***** ****** ******** detection ****.

Bandwidth **********

*** ******'* **** ***** bitrate *** *** ****** of ******* ** **** test, *** *** *** light (~*.** ***, ** on) ******* **** ******* Axis *** *****. *******, note **** ******* **** nor ***** ******** ****** images ** *** *****.

*** ** ***** **** different ***********, ** **** provide **** **********, ************ per *********. ****** ** Mb/s *** *********, *** Vivotek ****** ** ****** than *** **** ***** but ***** **** *** Pelco ****** ** **** light. *******, ** *** light, **'* ******* *** megapixel ** **** ****** than ****** (****** **** that ***** ******* *** not ******* ****** ******).

 

Test ********** 

*** ********* ******** **** applied ** *** *******:

  • *.***, * ***, ~** ************ was ****
  • */*** ******* ******* *****
  • ******* ***** ****** ** was ******* (***** ******* do *** ******* ***** CODECs)

***** ******** **** **** at ******** ****** ********* noted.

*** ********* ******** ******** were ****:

  • ******* ******-**: ******
  • **** *****-***: *.**.*.*
  • ***** ********-*-****-*******: *.*.*.**.****-**.*

Comments (19)

Vivotek says customers locating the MS8391 near other cameras may request a special firmware which keeps the camera's LEDs on full time, but this reduces IR range by ~30%.

So even other Vivotek cameras?

Yes, since the exposure of the other cameras (including VIVOTEK's) is not synchronized with the IR pulse of MS8391-EV, the image would be effected. Upgrading special firmware provided by VIVOTEK can eliminate this effect.

Back in the day, some cameras with an AC inlet could sync the frame with the mains cycle, and as long as everybody was getting more or less the same phase, all the frames would be in lockstep. Which made the old video muxes switch without a horizontal blip.

Nowadays of course with everything being POE the mains cycle sine wave has been long flattened, so that's not available.

Still, within a given manufacturers line, you would think that it could recognize the pulsing IR effect of another similar camera, if nothing else thru a crude video analytic. Then slight adjustments could be made in the timing to bring them all together. This would produce a natural incentive to stay within a manufacturer's line, so I think that if pulsed IR is indeed the "wave" of the future, we shall see such synchronization mechanisms shortly.

Any plans to test DWC-PB2M4TIR to compare with another IR panoramic?

No plans to test that one since it is only 6MP.

Their 48MP one is much more interesting to us, given its very high total resolution, though that they sold off ISD that developed this is a negative.

48MP is much more interesting, no doubt, but it doesn't have IR. Comparative test vs. another panoramic with IR would be interesting, but not critical, I agree.

So would you recommend this camera over the Axis?

Why are these things still only putting out 5fps? I can put 4 single cameras together and do much better...heck even just two.

I can put 4 single cameras together and do much better...

How much better? You mean like as fast the camera outputs them, e.g. 30 FPS?

So take 4 3MP cameras, read an uncompressed 3MB frame from each sensor, dewarp the edges, smooth and integrate the four frames into a single 10 MP raw image, compress it and then IP encode the whole thing and kick it out the door.

Do it in less than 30 milliseconds per frame and you are good to go!

faster fps and the image quality when using single cameras just seems much better. im not concerned about stitching, just coverage and quality.

You asked why. That's why.

@John or anyone any idea when is Axis going to update the q3709?

Update in what way? It's a pretty new camera so I wouldn't expect an upgraded model soon.

They have the Q3708 but it's much lower resolution (3x1080p). It's more light sensitive but it's a big drop in pixel count.

Perhaps he is referring to this, from the Q3709 test.

Yes I was referring to the firmware update it is a little late!

The AXIS Q3708 has 3 x Quad HD at 30 fps or 3 x 5 MP at 20 fps, and one IP address.

Will you be testing the Hik PanoVu's anytime soon?

I had the opportunity this week to test them but I'm keen to know your thoughts.

Just beware of the weight of the 1636. It comes in at a whopping 15kg.

Campbell, thanks, I am not sure if the PanoVu is available in North America yet.

We definitely will test the non-PTZ model, the 6986, because we expect it to be fairly widely used. Not sure about the PTZ one as the Axis version has been a niche so far. Maybe if the Hikvision one is much lower in price it could spur interest but don't know yet.

Would be great to see how it compares to the Avigilon Multi-sensor.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,584 reports, 886 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Vivotek LPR Camera Tested on Apr 15, 2020
Vivotek has historically sold license plate capture cameras but not LPR. Now,...
Multi-Imagers Added to IPVM Camera Calculator on Jun 15, 2020
IPVM has added multi-imager cameras to the Camera Calculator, supporting this...
IDIS Presents 12MP IR Panoramic Fisheye on May 26, 2020
IDIS presented its 12MP IR panoramic fisheye camera at the April 2020 IPVM...
K7 Wall Mounted IR Temp Gun Tested on Jun 26, 2020
The original K3 model was missing a number of important features but the...
Face Detection Shootout - Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Jul 30, 2020
Face detection analytics are available from a number of manufactures...
K3 Pro Wall Mounted IR Gun Tested on Aug 28, 2020
The original K3 model was lacking in features that the K7 model had and was...
The Future of Metalens For Video Surveillance Cameras - MIT / UMass / Immervision on Sep 25, 2020
Panoramic cameras using 'fisheye' lens have become commonplace in video...
Hanwha AI Object Detection Tested on Sep 28, 2020
Hanwha has added detection and classification of people, cars, clothing...
Vivotek Presents AI Analytics and LPR on May 19, 2020
Vivotek presented its AI Analytics and LPR at the April 2020 IPVM New...
K3 Wall Mounted IR Temperature Gun Tested on Jun 12, 2020
Is this the solution to not spending thousands of dollars on fever...
Verkada 2020 Cameras Image Quality Test on Oct 06, 2020
Verkada's first-generation cameras suffered from numerous video quality...
Avigilon Elevated Temperature Detection Camera Tested on Sep 17, 2020
Avigilon has entered the temperature screening market with the release of...
Injes Tiny Temperature Terminal Tested on Jul 17, 2020
While temperature terminals have trended bigger, the Injes DFace801 is...
IR Surveillance Camera Guide on Feb 06, 2020
Integrated infrared (IR) cameras are everywhere in 2020, but not all IR is...
Hanwha 8K / 33MP Camera Tested on Sep 14, 2020
Hanwha Techwin has released an 8K / 33MP resolution camera, the TNB-9000 with...

Recent Reports

Avigilon Aggressive Trade-In Program Takes Aim At Competitors on Oct 20, 2020
Avigilon has launched one of the most aggressive trade-in programs the video...
Mexico Video Surveillance Market Overview 2020 on Oct 20, 2020
Despite being neighbors, there are key differences between the U.S. and...
Dahua Revenue Grows But Profits Down, Cause Unclear on Oct 20, 2020
While Dahua's overall revenue was up more than 12% in Q3 2020, a significant...
Illegal Hikvision Fever Screening Touted In Australia, Government Investigating, Temperature References Deleted on Oct 20, 2020
The Australian government told IPVM that they are investigating a Hikvision...
Panasonic Presents i-PRO Cameras and Video Analytics on Oct 19, 2020
Panasonic presented its i-PRO X-Series cameras and AI video analytics at the...
Augmented Reality (AR) Cameras From Hikvision and Dahua Examined on Oct 19, 2020
Hikvision, Dahua, and other China companies are marketing augmented reality...
18 TB Video Surveillance Drives (WD and Seagate) on Oct 19, 2020
Both Seagate and Western Digital recently announced 18TB hard drives...
Watrix Gait Recognition Profile on Oct 16, 2020
Watrix is the world's only gait recognition surveillance provider IPVM has...
Intel Presents Edge-to-Cloud Ecosystem for Video Analytics on Oct 16, 2020
Intel presented its processors and software toolkit for computer vision at...
Microsoft Azure Presents Live Video Analytics on Oct 15, 2020
Microsoft Azure presented its Live Video Analytics offering at the September...
Worst Manufacturer Technical Support 2020 on Oct 15, 2020
4 manufacturers stood out as providing the worst technical support to ~200...
Clorox Announces, Then Pulls, Fever Camera on Oct 15, 2020
For almost one week, Clorox was marketing fever cameras. The booming...
Faulty Hikvision Fever Cam Setup at Mexico City Basilica and Cathedral on Oct 14, 2020
Donated Hikvision fever cameras (claiming screening of 1,800 people/min. with...
Directory of 211 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Oct 14, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...