Varifocal vs Fixed Focal Lens

Author: John Honovich, Published on May 29, 2014

Choosing between varifocal and fixed focal lens is one of the most fundamental decisions in video surveillance.

With a fixed focal lens, the Field of View (FoV) of the camera can not be changed unless the lens is changed. By contrast, varifocal lenses allow for immediate adjustment of the FoV simply by adjusting a control of the lens / camera.

But which one is used more and why?

Inside, our exclusive integrator survey results answer these questions.

******** ******* ********* *** ***** ***** **** ** *** ** the **** *********** ********* ** ***** ************.

**** * ***** ***** ****, *** ***** ** **** (***) of *** ****** *** *** ** ******* ****** *** **** is *******. ** ********, ********* ****** ***** *** ********* ********** of *** *** ****** ** ********* * ******* ** *** lens / ******.

*** ***** *** ** **** **** *** ***?

******, *** ********* ********** ****** ******* ****** ***** *********.

[***************]

*********** *** ********* ****** ** * *:* ****** **** ***** focal ******:

******, *** ******** ** *********** ****** ****** *** ********* ****** as **** ***** ************:

*******, * ******* ** *********** ****** *** ********* ****** ** shown ***** ** *** ***** **** ** *** ** ** 30% *****.

******, *** ***-***********, **** ** *** **** *** *** ******, fixed ***** ****** *** ********* *** **** **** **** *******. As ****, ********* ***** ******** (**** / ***), *** ********** of *** ******* ***** ***** ***** ****** ** ****** ~**%.

Why ********* ** ***** *****

***********

*** **** ****** ****** ** *** ********* ******, ***** ** integrators, *** ** ******** *** *** *** *** *** ****'* preference:

  • "********* ** **+% ** *** *********** *** ** *** **** allowing *** ****** ** **** *** **** *** ****** *****"
  • "** **** ***** **** ********* **** ***** **** ********* ** the ********* ** ************** ******* ********** ***/** ******** **** ** **** *** ********************* ** ***** ********* ****."
  • "**** **** *********** ** *** *** **** *** ***** ***** they **** ** *** * ********** ***** ** ****, *** then ***** ****** *** **** ***** ***** **** ** ****** widen ** ******* *** ***** ** ****."
  • "** *** ********* ********* ** ***** *** ********** **** ******* to ****** ******/***** ****** ** **** *** ******** **********"
  • "** *********** *** ***** ************ ** ******* ** ************ ******* made *** ** ******* *******, ***** **********, ***/** ********."
  • "** **** *** *********** *** *** *********** ****** ** ** able ** ****** *** ********** ** *** **** ** *** customer ******* ***** **** ***** **** **** **** ** ** important ** ****."

***** **** *** ***** ****** ***** **** ***** ***** *** wide * *** **** ****, ***** *** ****** ** *********, varifocal ******* *********** ** ******* **** ****.

*******, *** ********** ******* * ********* ******** ** **** ****, without ***** ********* ******, ********** ****, "** ***** ********* ***** length ******* *** **** *** ********* *** ** ********." ** the ********, ** ******* ********** *****, ********* "****** ** ******* *** ************ **** ********** ** ***** * ****** ** ******."

****

*** ***** ***** ******, *** ***** ****** #* ****** *** lower ****, *** ****** *** *** **** ******, *** ******* fixed ***** **** ******* *** ********* **** *********, **** ******** cameras *******. ********** *****:

  • "*** **** ****** ** ** ***** ** ******* ** ****."
  • "** *** ***** ***** ****** **** ** **** **** **** effective ********."
  • "********* **** ***********. ***** **** **** ** ********."
  • "** **** ** * ****** *** *** **** ** **** a ********** **** ****, **** ** *** **** ****** ** select *****."

*******, **** ** **** **** ***********, ** *** ********** *********, "* ***** ********* ********** ** ***** *** **** ********* **** ***** ******* video, *** ******* ** **** ** ******* *** & *** fixed ****'* ****** *** *** **** ** ** ** ****** end ***** (*********) ** **** *** ***." ****, **** ** not ******* ***** ******* ****** *********** ******* *** (****** *** is * ****** / ******* *************, *** ****) *** ********* fixed ******* *** ********* *** ****** ****, ********* ******** **** true ***.

***** ***** ****** *********** ******* **** ********* ******. ******, ***** ***** ****** ****** the **** ** ******* ***** *** ** ***** (*** ********* do *** ********* ** ** ***** ***** ****** ********* **** with * **** ***** **** *** ** *** ** *****). However, ************* ********* ******* ***** ***** ****** **** ****** *******, often **** ******* ******* ***************.

*********** ************

*********** ***** * ****** ** *********** ************ ***** ***** ****** are *** **** - **** ** ******* /**********, ******* *** ***** **** ********** *******.

Comments (13)

Rukmini Wilson

05/29/14 04:41pm

Fixed focal lenses are not lower quality than varifocal lenses...

Is it a myth that varifocal lenses have higher f-stops generally than their fixed lens counterparts, and that the difference is exacerbated as you move the varifocal towards the high range of its the focal length?

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Rukmini Wilson | 05/29/14 04:54pm

By definition, any time the focal width remains constant but the length increases, F stop will increase. That is typically the case with varifocal lens, i.e., adjust to a longer focal length while width remains constant.

Perhaps one could find a fixed focal length lens for a higher value (e.g., 9mm) with a lower f stop than, e.g., a 3-9mm. I've never heard, though, of someone pursuing this. Maybe though...

Andrew Lund

In reply to John Honovich | 05/30/14 06:51am

In my early days of doing surveillance video, when fixed focal length lenses were much more the norm and prepared installers usually kept a wide selection of lenses with them, I really wanted to get away from that and go with vari-focal as often as possible. I discovered Tamron, which at the time was marketing as having the only varifocal lenses on the market that maintained a constant F-stop throughout the full range of FOV adjustment. I was very pleased with the optics and mechanics of their lenses, and I did seem to get more consistent light handling throughout the FOV range than with most other brands, so they became my go-to lenses for a long time. I must confess, though, I could use an explanation on how they would have achieved this... a widening aperture as the focal length increases? Was it marketing mumbo-jumbo and the more consistent light gathering was simply because of the quality build? If it was truly an accurate claim, what other manufacturers are doing it now, too?

Rukmini Wilson

In reply to Andrew Lund | 05/30/14 08:20am

...varifocal lenses on the market that maintained a constant F-stop throughout the full range of FOV adjustment.

What's the model, do they still make it? It's hard to imagine that it could be solved by quality. Look thru a paper towel roll vs. a toilet paper roll, Charmin or not the toilet paper roll gonna win, no?

If they were widening and narrowing the aperture, and purposely restricting the best possible performance of the lens, by limiting the light, just to make their marketing claims true, that would be wrong hysterical.

Paul Galburt

05/29/14 07:23pm

In the world of photography, fixed focal length lenses (often called prime lenses) enjoy a significant quality margin over vari-focal (zoom) lenses, and generally have a smaller numerical "F" number meaning more light gathering.

Because the sensors in security cameras are so small, lower F number are relatively easier to acheive than with photographic camera lenses. Also, lower F numbers mean shallower depth of field (DOF). Shallow DOF is often prized in photography as it isolates the main subject from the background. This is almost always a real negative in security.

Also, while low F numbers are good for low-light performance, most security cameras use other means to improve low-light performance.

So, interestingly, the ideal security lens in any given situration is almost the reverse of the design of a photographic lens.

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Paul Galburt | 05/29/14 08:42pm

Paul, thanks for the feedback. I want to expand on one point you made:

"Also, while low F numbers are good for low-light performance, most security cameras use other means to improve low-light performance."

I agree with this. However, as a practical matter I have never seen a surveillance camera, for example, with an f/2.0 lens be good at low light. Generally, if a manufacturer wants a camera to be good at low light, they will easily spend the small delta to get an f/1.0, f/1.2, or f/1.4 lens, along with what they are spending on image processing, etc.

The one exception is integrated IR budget cameras, which generally have high f stops but include their own light source.

Rukmini Wilson

In reply to Paul Galburt | 05/30/14 01:48am

So, interestingly, the ideal security lens in any given situration is almost the reverse of the design of a photographic lens. (EA)

Interesting, yes, indubitable, no.

...most security cameras use other means to improve low-light performance.

First, although there may be 'other means' available to surveillence cameras, that's because low-light performance is so key to surveillence that other more artistic concerns, e.g. color space, low noise/distortion, are sacrificed if need be to that end. These are things that no photographic camera would dare do. But that, as John counters, doesn't mean lower F numbers are worse or even immaterial, they still comprise the front line assault against the forces of darkness, and all other things being equal, lower is better, and a lot lower is a lot better.

Also, lower F numbers mean shallower depth of field (DOF).

This is true. However true DOF issues are rarely seen in security cameras. Why? Two technical reasons:

1) Sensor size smaller sensor = deeper DOF. Witness the now ubiquitous availability of full-frame 35mm sensors in Pro DSLRs after old school photographers had enough of the 4/3 system with its crap crop factor of 2. Main reason shallower DOF afforded by larger sensors.

2) The nominal distance to subject is usually large enough to render it imperceptible. We're not talking close-up portrait with blurry daisies in the background. Also, if the distance is small enough to show the effect, often it doesn't matter if the background is out. Like in an LPC system.

And regardless, it seems unlikely that the industry is choosing higher f-upped lenses because they fear shallower FOV's.

So I would say although there are differents emphasises and constraints on each discipline, the lens design concerns generally follow the same vector.

Avatar

Nick Ames

In reply to Paul Galburt | 02/23/17 01:11am

Well noted Paul. Coming from a photographic background, and now learning surveillance technology, it is often hard to grasp concepts that seem to be turned upside down. I try to look at it as a completely different concept, or I get into trouble, trying to apply what I thought I previously knew about photography to surveillance cameras/lenses. I do want to eventually try large sensor (35mm) surveillance cameras.

Avatar

Ng Choy Mei

IPVMU Certified | 05/09/18 11:36am

Seems that varifocal lens is more popular and flexible.

Avatar

David Johnson

05/09/18 05:45pm

Good points all. I've often found that Optics knowledge is missing or downplayed amongst IT professionals moving into the surveillance realm. Had one instructor claim that any adjustment necessary could be made with the cameras setup software. As Charlie Pierce used to say 'We're gathering light first and foremost'.

Avatar

Brian Rhodes

IPVMU Certified | In reply to David Johnson | 05/09/18 05:54pm

Charlie Pierce is a legend! We did an interview with him a few years ago. See: Charlie Pierce: How Video Surveillance / CCTV Has Changed

Also, Charlie likes to give hugs. (He is a genuinely nice person)

Chin Liang Benjamin Lee

IPVMU Certified | 05/13/18 06:16pm

During previous installation, indeed many customers prefers to use vari-focal lenses due to the reasons mentioned above...nice sharing.

  • customers may want to increase ppf for certain situations and/or increase area of view depending on their perceived need
  • varifocal to allow our installers more freedom to adjust the fov/focal length to meet the customer preference

Charng Haw Guo

10/31/18 12:00pm

Simple yet easy to missed.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Private School IT Manager Surveillance Interview on Feb 22, 2019
This IT manager describes himself as the "oft-maligned IT person" whose "opinions may not always be appreciated by the integrator crowd." But he is...
HID Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 21, 2019
HID favorability results were strong, in the 2019 IPVM integrator study of 200+ integrators, with a net +62% and low negativity as the table below...
Axis IR Multi Imager Camera Tested (P3717-PLE) on Feb 18, 2019
Axis has released their first IR multi imager, the P3717-PLE, a repositionable model listing 360° IR illumination and flexible positioning,...
Ubiquiti Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 18, 2019
Ubiquiti has quietly grown into a $1+ billion annual revenue company, with offerings across wireless, wireline network and video surveillance (see...
Hanwha Smaller Multi Imager Tested (PNM-9000VQ) on Feb 14, 2019
Hanwha's first repositionable multi imager PNM-9081VQ tested well, but was huge, over 12" wide and weighing in at over 10 pounds. Now, they have...
Uniview / UNV Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 12, 2019
Uniview / UNV, the self-proclaimed #3 China manufacturer, while starting late, has been working to make inroads internationally. In IPVM's 2019...
Barnes Buchanan 2019: Despite 'Strange Narrative' Great Time To Be In Security on Feb 11, 2019
A "strange narrative" is being spun, said Michael Barnes at the 2019 Barnes Buchanan Conference. However, despite that narrative, it is a "great...
FLIR Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 08, 2019
FLIR has had a challenging past few years including FLIR Security business struggling, FLIR restructuring their security division and FLIR selling...
Sony Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 06, 2019
Sony Favorability amongst integrators improved moderately compared to their 2017 favorability results, with a modest net positive...
Hanwha Techwin Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 31, 2019
Hanwha Techwin's favorability results surged, in IPVM's 2019 study, going from barely neutral in 2016 to strongly net positive, as the results...

Most Recent Industry Reports

From The Basement To Buried Behind Chinatown: ISC West Emerging Technology Zone on Feb 22, 2019
What does ISC West think about 'Emerging Technology'? Well, last year, they put those companies in the basement. This year, they moved them up to...
Private School IT Manager Surveillance Interview on Feb 22, 2019
This IT manager describes himself as the "oft-maligned IT person" whose "opinions may not always be appreciated by the integrator crowd." But he is...
Outdoor Camera Mounting Hardware Guide on Feb 21, 2019
Mounting cameras outdoors can be challenging, requiring understanding different types of equipment and methods. In this guide, we teach this...
HID Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 21, 2019
HID favorability results were strong, in the 2019 IPVM integrator study of 200+ integrators, with a net +62% and low negativity as the table below...
First US State, Vermont, Bans Dahua and Hikvision on Feb 21, 2019
The first US state, Vermont, has issued a ban on a number of Chinese and Russian manufacturers including the world's 2 largest video surveillance...
ADI 'SAVE BIG' On FLIR And Hikvision Examined on Feb 20, 2019
One is a major US defense supplier. The other is owned by the Chinese government. But you can "SAVE BIG" on both at ADI. In this note, we...
BluB0x Company Profile on Feb 20, 2019
BluB0x has doubled in revenue every year since its founding in 2013, according to CEO Patrick Barry. We originally reported on them in 2015. At the...
Massive Leak Of Chinese VMS Provider Exposes Xinjiang Surveillance on Feb 20, 2019
A subsidiary of China’s claimed largest VMS provider is tracking the precise location and ethnicity of millions in China’s Xinjiang region,...
Security Installation Tools Guide - 22 Tools Listed on Feb 19, 2019
In this guide, we cover 22 tools that security installers frequently use. This is one part of our upcoming Video Surveillance...
Sales Cuts At Rasilient on Feb 19, 2019
Over the past 2 years, video surveillance storage specialist Rasilient has expanded its workforce significantly, aiming to build its own branded...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact