*******, ***** **** ******* **** *** speed ***** ** ***** **** *** do * **** *** ** * second. ****** ********, “** ***** **** at ** ******* *** ******. ** I’m ******* ** * ***** ** feet **** *** * ****** ** pan **** *** **** **** ** the ***** ****, ** ***** **** me ***** **** *******, ** ******** was *** ** **** ***** **** then.”
** ******, $*,*** ** ***** *** is *** ********** ** $**,*** ** $15,000 *****. **** '*****' ******** ***** cameras ***** **** $*,*** ********* ** that ****.
Recording ********
**** **** ******* ** *****, *** recording *** ********** *******. ****** ***** that **** ** ***** *** ***** record ** "****-*****," *** *** ****** you ********* *** * *****, *** fewer ****** *** ****** *** ***. Add **** ** ****** ********* *** the **** ******* * ********'* ***** enemy. *** *******, * *** ******** set ** *** ***** ** ********* would **** * ***** ***** * seconds. ** *** *** **** * cameras *********, **** ***** **** * frame *** ****** ***** ** *******, a **** *** *** ****** ** happen."
Conservative ***********When cameras were more expensive, Pierce noted a positive upside. People were more conservative and practical with their camera layouts. They were much more careful how they designed. But 10 to 15 years ago, as equipment became more available at less cost, people started getting carried away, he says. Projects are deploying more than enough cameras, but they are not deploying them in a way that meets the needs of the application. "They're selling cameras, not security application or support," he said.
Fixed ******* ***** ********** *** ******
“*********** *** **** ****** ******* ****’* in ***** ***** *****. ** **** continuously ****-*** [************] ******* **** ***’* have *** ********* ****** ** ********** interface ******** ** ** *** ****. This ****** ***** ******* ** ** the *** *****.” ***** *********** ***** work **** ****** ********* ***** ** if *** **** ******* ****** ** not ** ***** ***** **** **** can’t **** **, ** ****.
Cameras ********
“*** ** *** ******* ******* *’** seen ** *** ******** ** * whole ** **** **’** ********** **** our *** ** *** ******** *** to ******* ****** ********,” ****** ****. “Now, *** ******* ** ‘***’* ***** everything *** **** ** *** ** the ***.’ **** ********* *** ****** money *** ** ******* ********* *** service ********* ** **** ***'* ** a ******** *** ** ******* ** where ** *** ******* *** ******** necessary ** *** ***********. ** ***** **** a **** ** ********, ********** ** possibly * **** ** **** *** bottom **** ** *** ****** ****," he ****.
************, ** **** ******* ************ ***** used *** **** **** ****** ** done ** ******, **** ******** *********. The ******** *** ******* *** ******** away ************, *** ***** ** *** **** more *** ************ ** ***********, ****** said. **** ** **** ********* ** CCTV ** ****** ** ******* *******,*** some ** ** ** ****** ** fear, ** ****.
End ***** ****** **** ***********
*** ******* *** **** ** *** educated ****** ***** ***** ************ ** know **** ** ***** ** **** best *** ***** ***********. “**’* * mistake *** ** **** * ********** - *** ****** *** **** *** training *** *** ********** ** ** this *****. **** ** ** **** come **** ****** *** **** ***** $1 ******* *** **** ** ****** they *** **** *** ** *** contract*** **** **** *** *** ***** thing,” ** ****. “*************, **** ******* **** what **** ******, *** ** ***’* what **** ****** … **** *** enough ******* ********** ***** *** ***********, needs *** ******** ** *** ******.”
Education *** ********* ******Surveillance has always been the “bastard child” of the security industry Pierce says. While physical security guidelines are popular and there are a number of certifications related them, surveillance is an area that has not seen much growth as far education goes. “We’ve got this tremendous technology, but we’ve got no standards. We’ve got not rules,” he said. Standards would make sure people at least had a minimal knowledge base when putting together systems. He noted that the security industry in the U.S. seems to be much less interested in standards than the industry in Europe. Pierce and others worked with SIA to put together * ************ ************* ******* *** ******** standards*** **** ** ***** **** *** among ******** ************* (*** *** ******* out ** ****, ****** ****** ** **** ****).
Final *******
“* ** *** ** *** ******* that *** ******** ** *** ** even ** ******* … * ** concerned **** ** *** ****** ***** of *** **** ******* *** ********* visual ******* **; ********, ************, ******, and ** ******* ****** ********* ** the ******* *** ****, ******* *** advanced ********** **** ** *********. ****** technology ******* *********, *********, ****** ** purpose ** **** ******* **** ** invasion *** ** *** *** **** cost ** *** *** ******* *** specific, ***** *** ****** ** ******* and *******. * **** **** ****** it ***-**** *** ***** *****. ** cameras **** ** *** ******* *** down ***/** ************* ** ******? *** and **. ***** ***** **.”
Comments (0)