Lenel vs Software House Markups Analyzed

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Oct 14, 2016

This note breaks down and contrasts the markups between two big access brands: Lenel (OnGuard) versus Software House (C-Cure). Our analysis of dealer markup survey data reveals interesting trends and differences in profitability and competitive performance.

Markup Comparisons

The average markups are:

  • Lenel OnGuard: ~25 - 35%
  • Software House CCure: ~30% - 50%

While markup percentages may overlap, Software House markups generally trended higher. These differences in markups do not mean enduser/resell pricing is dramatically different, but the profits respective dealers take may be.

Inside this note, we examine product differences, cost comparisons, and detailed integrator feedback on Lenel and Software House.

**** **** ****** **** *** ********* *** ******* ******* *** big ****** ******: ***** (*******) ****** ******** ***** (*-****). *** analysis ** ****** ****** ****** **** ******* *********** ****** *** differences ** ************* *** *********** ***********.

Markup ***********

*** ******* ******* ***:

  • ***** *******: ~** - **%
  • ******** ***** *****: ~**% - **%

***** ****** *********** *** *******, ******** ***** ******* ********* ******* higher. ***** *********** ** ******* ** *** **** *******/****** ******* is ************ *********, *** *** ******* ********** ******* **** *** be.

****** **** ****, ** ******* ******* ***********, **** ***********, *** detailed ********** ******** ** ***** *** ******** *****.

[***************]

Markup *******

** ***** ** ********** / ******* ********, **** ********** ** **********/******* **:

****** ********** = ***** **** - ***** **** / ***** Paid

** *** ****** ** **%, **** * **** **** ***** $500 ** ****** **** ****** ***** *** ***** ** ****** at $***.

Component ***** *******

** ***** ** *** **** ***** ****** ** ********* *** system, **** ********* **** ******** (**:**** ***********, ******, *** */* *******) ************* ****************. ***** ** ***** **** ******** ** **** * *********** system, * '*******' ******** *******, *** ******* **, **** ** these ***** *** ********.

*** ******* ******* ********* **** ***** ** ******** ***** *** in **** *** **** $*** - $*** *** ******* *****, with ********* *** **** **** ** ********, *****, *******, *******, and ***** ****** ******** *** ******.

Product ***********

*******, * *** ********** ******* ********* ** ** *** ******** resell *****.

***** ******** ***** ***** **** *********** ******** (***** ***********) *** ******** ******** *** ******** *********** ** *** *******,***** ** * ******* ******** *********** **** *** ******* ******** ******* ******** *** ******* ******* on ******** *********** *** *******.

** *******, *** ******** ** *** ***** ******** ******* ** increased ***** *********** **** ***** ******* ***** ****** ******** ****** and ********* *** **** *****, *** **** ************** ** ********** control ** *************, ***********, *** ******* ***** ** **** ********.

*******, ***** ****** **** *******-********* ************ **** ******** *****, *** an ******* ****** *** ********** ***** *** ****** **** * similarly ***** ***** ****** **** *** ********** *********** ******* *** licenses *** *********.

Cost ************

****** *** *********** ********** ** ******** ******** *** ***********, **** Lenel *** ******** ***** ***** ****** ****** ********* *******:

  • **** *** ****** ******* ***** **** **** ******* ***** *****, but *** **** ****** ******** ******* *** ***** *******.
  • **** *** ***** ******* ** *** ****** ********** *********** *** ********** ********* *** **** ******* *** ****** ***** products.
  • **** ******* *** *********, **** ********* ****** ** ******* *** decades. ******* ****** ******** ** ***, **** ********* ******* ******* revenues ** **** ** *********** **********.

Head ** **** ***********

**** ********* ***** ******* ****** ********** *** ******* ** *** high-end ** *** ****** ******, **** **** ***** *****-**** *** even ************* *******. ** ******* **** ********* ** ****** ** our****** ******* ******. *** ********** ****** *** ********* *****:

*****

** ***** ** ******** ****** ******* ******* *******:

******** *****

** ***** ** *********** ***** ****** ******* ******* *******:

** *******, *** ******* ********** ******* ********* ** ********, ***** Software ***** ** *********** *** ***** **** *** ***** ********. In *******, ***** ******** ******* *** **** *** ** ********* from ******** ***** **** ********* "**** *******" *** **** ****** Lenel's ******** ** *******, *** ******* *** ********, **** ***********/******, and ******* ** ***** ** ****.

Lenel ******* ********** ********

************, *********** ******* **** ***** ******** ******* ** *** **% - **% *****, **** *** ***** **%. ******** ********:

  • "[*** *****] ** ******* ***** **%".
  • "** ***** **** ** *** * **% ******. ********* ** the **** ** *** ******* *** *** ********, ** ***** a ********* **** **** ************, ** ***** **** **** **** 20%-22% ******."
  • "** *** *** *******, ** *** **%"
  • "**% *** **** ****. *** *********** ********* *** ******** ******* driving **** ****."
  • "******* *** ****** ** ****** **%."
  • "*** *****, *** ******* **% ****** **** **** ********* **** number ** *******, ****** ** ******* ********* ********* **********."

Software ***** ******* ********** ********

** ********, ******** ***** ****** ******* ****** ** ** ****** than ***** ****, **** **** ********* **% - **%, *** some ******** **** ******. ******** ********:

  • "** **** ********** ********* **** *** ********* ***** ***** ******** 30% ******* ** *********."
  • "***** ******* **** **** **-**% ** ******"
  • "**%, ********* ***** ** ** ***********"
  • "*** ******* **** ** ** **%. **** *** ******** ****** constant, ******** **** *** *** ****** (**+ ****) ****."
  • "*** **-**% ****** *** ******** ****** ********."

Maintenance ********* **********

** *******, ******* ** ********* *** ********* ******** ********** ** another **** ** ********** * ******, *** ** *** ********* for ** ****** *******.*** ******'* ****** *** ****** ** ***** *** ******* **** small, ****** ***** *********** ** * ******** ****-******* **** ** the *** ****, **** *** **** ** ******** ****** **** subsequent ***** ** ******* ******* ** *** ******.

*****'* ********* ****** ******** ******* ********* (***) ****** **** ~$*** *** small ******* **** *** *********** ******* ** ~$**,***+ *** ********** versions. *** *********** ***-******* ******** *** ******* ***** *** ******* by *** ***, *** ** ** *** ********** ******'* ********** to ******* ******* ******* ** ***.

******** *****'* ********* ******* ******** *********** ******* ********* **** ***** ******* **% - 25% ** *** ***** ***** ** * ******'* ******** ********, as ****** ** $** *** ***** ******* **** ~ * doors, ******* ** $**,*** *** *****, *********, ** ******* ********** systems. ** **** *****, **** ********* **** ** ***** ** order ** ******* ********* ******** ******** *** ******* **** ******* technicians.

Market *******

** ******* **** ******* *****, **** ********* **** ******** ******* pressure **** ********** ***********. ******* **** *** ********* ***** *******, ********** ******** *********** *****, **** ***** *** ******** ***** ********* **** ********** ******* with ******* *** ******* ** ***** *********.

*******, *** *** ******** **************** ********** ***** ** ******** ***** dealers' *****. ******* *** **** '****-**' ***** ** ********* ****** in ******** **** ****** ********, *** **** ** ******** **** a ***** ****** ** **** *********, *** ** ** ****** population ** ********** ********* **** *** ****-**** ******** ** *********.

**** ******** ***** ***** ******** ***********, *** ***** ** * change *********** ***** *** ******** ** ******** *** ********, ***** can *** ******** *** ******* **** ** * ******** ******* (e.g., *** ********** ***** *******) *** ****.

Comments (6)

Totalling the scorecards gives Lenel a marginal edge over SH*, yet from the standpoint of the dealer at least, SH seems more attractive.

  1. Equally competitive on price
  2. Better margins
  3. More lock-in

Lenel might be easier to sell since it is more open, but I'm not sure how important that is in these types of systems.

Is it easier to become a Lenel dealer, perhaps?

*6 Greens, 3 Reds, 0 Yellows vs 6 Greens, 2 Reds, 1 Yellow

This is useful information. I'd really like to know how they compare in terms of customer satisfaction and ease of use though, especially against other enterprise systems. I know it's hard to set up that kind of testing with end users, but without taking the complete user experience into consideration, it's hard to determine value.

One access control company that always seems to get ignored is Kantech (manufacture their own hardware). Tyco has owned and operated two seemingly competitive access control companies Kantech and Software House. I wonder if the Johnson Controls merger will change this and they can work on development of just one platform.

Kantech isn't ignored. For example, see: Tyco Kantech Access Control Company Profile.

One big structural difference is that Software House is a dealer-only offering, but Kantech is widely available through distribution. While CCure is often used in large, high-end deployments, Kantech is suited for smaller, more basic access systems.

The Tyco Kantech/Software House issue is similar to the Honeywell WinPak/Pro-Watch line up, also. One distribution line, one dealer line. Ingersoll Rand used to be the same way also when they had their enterprise line which was dealer, and then Bright Blue through distro.

It seems to be getting less common, though.

I work for a company that is a dealer for both Lenel and Software House.

This is a good comparison. The point of open hardware being one of the bigger differences is true.

The good part of open hardware is that the end user can switch to another software platform if they get frustrated with Lenel. The good part of proprietary hardware, as Software House has shown, is that they control the hardware development and are able to bring hardware enhancement to market more quickly.

I support small, medium, and large systems on both platforms. Each product and each manufacturer has good points and issues. One of the prime determining factors should be the functionality that the customer, the end user, needs and the capability of the dealer to deliver and support a system that functions in the manner that the customer expects.

Point - the software support agreement for a small Lenel system is in line with the Software House support costs. Throwing in the cost of software enhancements isn't a reasonable comparison unless you add those costs into the Software House side.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Genetec Security Center 5.8 Tested on Mar 19, 2019
Genetec has released Version 5.8. This comes after a wait of more than a year that caused frustrations for many Genetec partners. Our previous...
Retired Mercury President Returns As Open Options President on Mar 18, 2019
Open Options experienced major changes in 2018, including being acquired by ACRE and losing its President and General Manager, John Berman who...
Large US University End-User Video Surveillance Interview on Mar 18, 2019
Schools have become targets in modern days of active shooters and terrorist fears. The need for video and access security is high. Universities...
Hikvision Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 18, 2019
Hikvision favorability results declined significantly in IPVM's 2019 study of 200+ integrators. While in 2017 Hikvision's favorability was...
ONVIF Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 15, 2019
In the past decade, ONVIF has grown from a reaction to the outside Cisco-lead PSIA challenge, to being the de facto video surveillance standard...
Integrator Profitability Bonuses - Statistics on Mar 13, 2019
While winning projects typically gets the most attention, how profitable those jobs turn out to be is key to the long-term success of integrators....
Network Optix Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 11, 2019
Network Optix is arguably the last new VMS. Founded in 2010, more than a decade after most client/server VMS offerings, the company has become a...
BCDVideo Expansion And Switch From HP To Dell Examined on Mar 11, 2019
BCDVideo says they have more than tripled revenue in the past 5 years and are continuing to grow, powered most recently by switching their lead...
Arcules Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 08, 2019
Arcules has amazing advantages. Tens of millions of funding from Canon. Unlimited access to Milestone's source code (see our test results). But...
Start Up Safe Zone $150 Gunfire Detector Profile on Mar 06, 2019
While gunfire detectors have been around for years, typically they are limited to enterprise level or municipal deployments. Startup AVidea, makers...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Avigilon Launches 'Renewed Products Program' on Mar 19, 2019
There are lots of 'pre-owned' cars but pre-owned IP cameras? While such programs are common in other industries, in video surveillance, they are...
Hanwha Tax Evasion Probe, Camera Division Implicated on Mar 19, 2019
A Hanwha group subsidiary was raided as part of a tax evasion probe. While a Korean news media report listed the raided entity as 'Hanwha...
Genetec Security Center 5.8 Tested on Mar 19, 2019
Genetec has released Version 5.8. This comes after a wait of more than a year that caused frustrations for many Genetec partners. Our previous...
Retired Mercury President Returns As Open Options President on Mar 18, 2019
Open Options experienced major changes in 2018, including being acquired by ACRE and losing its President and General Manager, John Berman who...
Large US University End-User Video Surveillance Interview on Mar 18, 2019
Schools have become targets in modern days of active shooters and terrorist fears. The need for video and access security is high. Universities...
Hikvision Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 18, 2019
Hikvision favorability results declined significantly in IPVM's 2019 study of 200+ integrators. While in 2017 Hikvision's favorability was...
ONVIF Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 15, 2019
In the past decade, ONVIF has grown from a reaction to the outside Cisco-lead PSIA challenge, to being the de facto video surveillance standard...
Installation Course - Last Chance on Mar 14, 2019
This is the last chance to register for the March Installation course. This is a unique installation course in a market where little practical...
City Physical Security Manager Interview on Mar 14, 2019
This physical security pro is the Physical Security Manager for the City of Calgary. He is a criminologist by training with an ASIS CPP credential....
US Drafting Separate Rule for NDAA Dahua/Hikvision 'Blacklist' on Mar 14, 2019
The most debated provision of the NDAA ban of Dahua, Hikvision, Huawei, et al. is the so-called 'blacklist' provision which would ban any company...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact