Lenel vs Software House Markups Analyzed

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Oct 14, 2016

This note breaks down and contrasts the markups between two big access brands: Lenel (OnGuard) versus Software House (C-Cure). Our analysis of dealer markup survey data reveals interesting trends and differences in profitability and competitive performance.

Markup Comparisons

The average markups are:

  • Lenel OnGuard: ~25 - 35%
  • Software House CCure: ~30% - 50%

While markup percentages may overlap, Software House markups generally trended higher. These differences in markups do not mean enduser/resell pricing is dramatically different, but the profits respective dealers take may be.

Inside this note, we examine product differences, cost comparisons, and detailed integrator feedback on Lenel and Software House.

**** **** ****** **** *** ********* *** ******* ******* *** big ****** ******: ***** (*******) ****** ******** ***** (*-****). *** analysis ** ****** ****** ****** **** ******* *********** ****** *** differences ** ************* *** *********** ***********.

Markup ***********

*** ******* ******* ***:

  • ***** *******: ~** - **%
  • ******** ***** *****: ~**% - **%

***** ****** *********** *** *******, ******** ***** ******* ********* ******* higher. ***** *********** ** ******* ** *** **** *******/****** ******* is ************ *********, *** *** ******* ********** ******* **** *** be.

****** **** ****, ** ******* ******* ***********, **** ***********, *** detailed ********** ******** ** ***** *** ******** *****.

[***************]

Markup *******

** ***** ** ********** / ******* ********, **** ********** ** **********/******* **:

****** ********** = ***** **** - ***** **** / ***** Paid

** *** ****** ** **%, **** * **** **** ***** $500 ** ****** **** ****** ***** *** ***** ** ****** at $***.

Component ***** *******

** ***** ** *** **** ***** ****** ** ********* *** system, **** ********* **** ******** (**:**** ***********, ******, *** */* *******) ************* ****************. ***** ** ***** **** ******** ** **** * *********** system, * '*******' ******** *******, *** ******* **, **** ** these ***** *** ********.

*** ******* ******* ********* **** ***** ** ******** ***** *** in **** *** **** $*** - $*** *** ******* *****, with ********* *** **** **** ** ********, *****, *******, *******, and ***** ****** ******** *** ******.

Product ***********

*******, * *** ********** ******* ********* ** ** *** ******** resell *****.

***** ******** ***** ***** **** *********** ******** (***** ***********) *** ******** ******** *** ******** *********** ** *** *******,***** ** * ******* ******** *********** **** *** ******* ******** ******* ******** *** ******* ******* on ******** *********** *** *******.

** *******, *** ******** ** *** ***** ******** ******* ** increased ***** *********** **** ***** ******* ***** ****** ******** ****** and ********* *** **** *****, *** **** ************** ** ********** control ** *************, ***********, *** ******* ***** ** **** ********.

*******, ***** ****** **** *******-********* ************ **** ******** *****, *** an ******* ****** *** ********** ***** *** ****** **** * similarly ***** ***** ****** **** *** ********** *********** ******* *** licenses *** *********.

Cost ************

****** *** *********** ********** ** ******** ******** *** ***********, **** Lenel *** ******** ***** ***** ****** ****** ********* *******:

  • **** *** ****** ******* ***** **** **** ******* ***** *****, but *** **** ****** ******** ******* *** ***** *******.
  • **** *** ***** ******* ** *** ****** ********** *********** *** ********** ********* *** **** ******* *** ****** ***** products.
  • **** ******* *** *********, **** ********* ****** ** ******* *** decades. ******* ****** ******** ** ***, **** ********* ******* ******* revenues ** **** ** *********** **********.

Head ** **** ***********

**** ********* ***** ******* ****** ********** *** ******* ** *** high-end ** *** ****** ******, **** **** ***** *****-**** *** even ************* *******. ** ******* **** ********* ** ****** ** our****** ******* ******. *** ********** ****** *** ********* *****:

*****

** ***** ** ******** ****** ******* ******* *******:

******** *****

** ***** ** *********** ***** ****** ******* ******* *******:

** *******, *** ******* ********** ******* ********* ** ********, ***** Software ***** ** *********** *** ***** **** *** ***** ********. In *******, ***** ******** ******* *** **** *** ** ********* from ******** ***** **** ********* "**** *******" *** **** ****** Lenel's ******** ** *******, *** ******* *** ********, **** ***********/******, and ******* ** ***** ** ****.

Lenel ******* ********** ********

************, *********** ******* **** ***** ******** ******* ** *** **% - **% *****, **** *** ***** **%. ******** ********:

  • "[*** *****] ** ******* ***** **%".
  • "** ***** **** ** *** * **% ******. ********* ** the **** ** *** ******* *** *** ********, ** ***** a ********* **** **** ************, ** ***** **** **** **** 20%-22% ******."
  • "** *** *** *******, ** *** **%"
  • "**% *** **** ****. *** *********** ********* *** ******** ******* driving **** ****."
  • "******* *** ****** ** ****** **%."
  • "*** *****, *** ******* **% ****** **** **** ********* **** number ** *******, ****** ** ******* ********* ********* **********."

Software ***** ******* ********** ********

** ********, ******** ***** ****** ******* ****** ** ** ****** than ***** ****, **** **** ********* **% - **%, *** some ******** **** ******. ******** ********:

  • "** **** ********** ********* **** *** ********* ***** ***** ******** 30% ******* ** *********."
  • "***** ******* **** **** **-**% ** ******"
  • "**%, ********* ***** ** ** ***********"
  • "*** ******* **** ** ** **%. **** *** ******** ****** constant, ******** **** *** *** ****** (**+ ****) ****."
  • "*** **-**% ****** *** ******** ****** ********."

Maintenance ********* **********

** *******, ******* ** ********* *** ********* ******** ********** ** another **** ** ********** * ******, *** ** *** ********* for ** ****** *******.*** ******'* ****** *** ****** ** ***** *** ******* **** small, ****** ***** *********** ** * ******** ****-******* **** ** the *** ****, **** *** **** ** ******** ****** **** subsequent ***** ** ******* ******* ** *** ******.

*****'* ********* ****** ******** ******* ********* (***) ****** **** ~$*** *** small ******* **** *** *********** ******* ** ~$**,***+ *** ********** versions. *** *********** ***-******* ******** *** ******* ***** *** ******* by *** ***, *** ** ** *** ********** ******'* ********** to ******* ******* ******* ** ***.

******** *****'* ********* ******* ******** *********** ******* ********* **** ***** ******* **% - 25% ** *** ***** ***** ** * ******'* ******** ********, as ****** ** $** *** ***** ******* **** ~ * doors, ******* ** $**,*** *** *****, *********, ** ******* ********** systems. ** **** *****, **** ********* **** ** ***** ** order ** ******* ********* ******** ******** *** ******* **** ******* technicians.

Market *******

** ******* **** ******* *****, **** ********* **** ******** ******* pressure **** ********** ***********. ******* **** *** ********* ***** *******, ********** ******** *********** *****, **** ***** *** ******** ***** ********* **** ********** ******* with ******* *** ******* ** ***** *********.

*******, *** *** ******** **************** ********** ***** ** ******** ***** dealers' *****. ******* *** **** '****-**' ***** ** ********* ****** in ******** **** ****** ********, *** **** ** ******** **** a ***** ****** ** **** *********, *** ** ** ****** population ** ********** ********* **** *** ****-**** ******** ** *********.

**** ******** ***** ***** ******** ***********, *** ***** ** * change *********** ***** *** ******** ** ******** *** ********, ***** can *** ******** *** ******* **** ** * ******** ******* (e.g., *** ********** ***** *******) *** ****.

Comments (6)

Totalling the scorecards gives Lenel a marginal edge over SH*, yet from the standpoint of the dealer at least, SH seems more attractive.

  1. Equally competitive on price
  2. Better margins
  3. More lock-in

Lenel might be easier to sell since it is more open, but I'm not sure how important that is in these types of systems.

Is it easier to become a Lenel dealer, perhaps?

*6 Greens, 3 Reds, 0 Yellows vs 6 Greens, 2 Reds, 1 Yellow

This is useful information. I'd really like to know how they compare in terms of customer satisfaction and ease of use though, especially against other enterprise systems. I know it's hard to set up that kind of testing with end users, but without taking the complete user experience into consideration, it's hard to determine value.

One access control company that always seems to get ignored is Kantech (manufacture their own hardware). Tyco has owned and operated two seemingly competitive access control companies Kantech and Software House. I wonder if the Johnson Controls merger will change this and they can work on development of just one platform.

Kantech isn't ignored. For example, see: Tyco Kantech Access Control Company Profile.

One big structural difference is that Software House is a dealer-only offering, but Kantech is widely available through distribution. While CCure is often used in large, high-end deployments, Kantech is suited for smaller, more basic access systems.

The Tyco Kantech/Software House issue is similar to the Honeywell WinPak/Pro-Watch line up, also. One distribution line, one dealer line. Ingersoll Rand used to be the same way also when they had their enterprise line which was dealer, and then Bright Blue through distro.

It seems to be getting less common, though.

I work for a company that is a dealer for both Lenel and Software House.

This is a good comparison. The point of open hardware being one of the bigger differences is true.

The good part of open hardware is that the end user can switch to another software platform if they get frustrated with Lenel. The good part of proprietary hardware, as Software House has shown, is that they control the hardware development and are able to bring hardware enhancement to market more quickly.

I support small, medium, and large systems on both platforms. Each product and each manufacturer has good points and issues. One of the prime determining factors should be the functionality that the customer, the end user, needs and the capability of the dealer to deliver and support a system that functions in the manner that the customer expects.

Point - the software support agreement for a small Lenel system is in line with the Software House support costs. Throwing in the cost of software enhancements isn't a reasonable comparison unless you add those costs into the Software House side.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...
Pelco Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 11, 2019
Pelco had a significant favorability problem amongst integrators in our previous study (see 2016 Pelco results). Now, in the first edition of our...
Wavelynx Access Control Manufacturer Profile on Jan 10, 2019
Denver-based WaveLynx is not well known as an access reader manufacturer, but OEMs for big industry brands including Amag, Isonas (Allegion),...
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial on Jan 08, 2019
H.265 support improved significantly in 2018, with H.265 camera/VMS compatibility increased compared to only a year ago, and most manufacturers...
2019 Video Surveillance Cameras Overview on Jan 07, 2019
Each year, IPVM summarizes the main advances and changes for video surveillance cameras, based on our industry-leading testing and...
IPVM Best New Products 2019 Opened - 70+ Entrants on Jan 07, 2019
The inaugural IPVM Best New Product Awards has been opened - the industry's first and only program where the awards are not pay-to-play and the...
CyberExtruder Face Recognition Profile on Jan 04, 2019
CyberExtruder offers 3D modeling face recognition software that they say provides quicker and more accurate matches than other 2D face recognition...
Surveillance Codec Guide on Jan 03, 2019
Codecs are core to surveillance, with names like H.264, H.265, and MJPEG commonly cited. How do they work? Why should you use them? What issues may...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...
2019 IP Networking Book Released on Jan 14, 2019
The new IP Networking Book 2019 is a 285 page in-depth guide that teaches you how IT and telecom technologies impact modern security...
Arecont Costar Layoffs on Jan 14, 2019
Arecont Vision, a Costar Company, has laid off more than 10% of their workforce in a move the company described to IPVM as a result of "important...
The False SCMP Story on Hikvision NYC AI on Jan 14, 2019
In the past week, one of Asia's largest publications, the South China Morning Post (SCMP), posted an article about "Chinese [facial recognition]...
WDR Tutorial on Jan 11, 2019
Understanding wide dynamic range (WDR) is critical to capturing high quality images in demanding conditions. However, with no real standards, any...
Pelco Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 11, 2019
Pelco had a significant favorability problem amongst integrators in our previous study (see 2016 Pelco results). Now, in the first edition of our...
Bad: Dahua Villa Video Doorbell Tested on Jan 11, 2019
Doorbells are one of the hottest segments in the residential market but Dahua's Villa Video Doorbell is the worst we have tested.   We bought and...
Last Chance - Winter 2019 IP Networking Course on Jan 10, 2019
Today is the last day to register for the Winter 2019 IP Networking course. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact