Lenel vs Software House Markups Analyzed

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Oct 14, 2016

This note breaks down and contrasts the markups between two big access brands: Lenel (OnGuard) versus Software House (C-Cure). Our analysis of dealer markup survey data reveals interesting trends and differences in profitability and competitive performance.

Markup Comparisons

The average markups are:

  • Lenel OnGuard: ~25 - 35%
  • Software House CCure: ~30% - 50%

While markup percentages may overlap, Software House markups generally trended higher. These differences in markups do not mean enduser/resell pricing is dramatically different, but the profits respective dealers take may be.

Inside this note, we examine product differences, cost comparisons, and detailed integrator feedback on Lenel and Software House.

**** **** ****** **** and ********* *** ******* ******* two *** ****** ******: Lenel (*******) ****** ******** House (*-****). *** ******** of ****** ****** ****** data reveals *********** ****** *** differences ** ************* *** competitive ***********.

Markup ***********

*** ******* ******* ***:

  • ***** *******: ~** - 35%
  • ******** ***** *****: ~**% - **%

***** ****** *********** *** overlap, ******** ***** ******* generally ******* ******. ***** *********** in ******* ** *** mean *******/****** ******* ** dramatically *********, *** *** profits ********** ******* **** may **.

****** **** ****, ** examine ******* ***********, **** comparisons, *** ******** ********** feedback ** ***** *** Software *****.

[***************]

Markup *******

** ***** ** *** ******* / ******* ********, **** ********** ** calculated/defined **:

****** ********** = ***** Sold - ***** **** / ***** ****

** *** ****** ** **%, then * **** **** costs $*** ** ****** with ****** ***** *** labor ** ****** ** $675.

Component ***** *******

** ***** ** *** much ***** ****** ** ********* per ******, **** ********* have ******** (**:**** ***********, ******, *** */* *******) and********** ******** ********. ***** ** ***** both ******** ** **** a *********** ******, * 'project' ******** *******, *** marking **, **** ** these ***** *** ********.

*** ******* ******* ********* with ***** ** ******** House *** ** **** the **** $*** - $500 *** ******* *****, with ********* *** **** type ** ********, *****, sensors, *******, *** ***** effort ******** *** ******.

Product *********** 

*******, * *** ********** ******* companies ** ** *** hardware ****** *****.

***** ******** ***** ***** both *********** ******** (***** ***********) *** ******** ******** and ******** *********** ** the *******,***** ** * ******* Security *********** **** *** ******* standard ******* ******** *** focuses ******* ** ******** development *** *******.

** *******, *** ******** on *** ***** ******** results ** ********* ***** competition **** ***** ******* based ****** ******** ****** and ********* *** **** parts, *** **** ************** or ********** ******* ** manufacturing, ***********, *** ******* costs ** **** ********.

*******, ***** ****** **** factory-supported ************ **** ******** House, *** ** ******* system *** ********** ***** out ****** **** * similarly ***** ***** ****** once *** ********** *********** modules *** ******** *** purchased.

Cost ************

****** *** *********** ********** in ******** ******** *** development, **** ***** *** Software ***** ***** ****** ground ********* *******:

  • **** *** ****** ******* lines **** **** ******* price *****, *** *** have ****** ******** ******* and ***** *******.
  • **** *** ***** ******* in *** ****** ********** like*** **** *** ********** ********* *** much ******* *** ****** their ********.
  • **** ******* *** *********, they ********* ****** ** service *** *******. ******* system ******** ** ***, both ********* ******* ******* revenues ** **** ** maintenance **********.

Head ** **** ***********

**** ********* ***** ******* market ********** *** ******* at *** ****-*** ** the ****** ******, **** many ***** *****-**** *** even ************* *******. ** covered **** ********* ** detail ** ********* ******* ******. *** ********** ****** are ********* *****:

*****

** ***** ** *** ***** ****** ******* ******* Profile:

******** *****

** ***** ** *** ******** ***** ****** ******* Company *******:

** *******, *** ******* difference ******* ********* ** hardware, ***** ******** ***** is *********** *** ***** uses *** ***** ********. In *******, ***** ******** pricing *** **** *** be ********* **** ******** House **** ********* "**** Servers" *** **** ****** Lenel's ******** ** *******, but ******* *** ********, door ***********/******, *** ******* is ***** ** ****.

Lenel Markups ********** ********

************, *********** ******* **** Lenel reported ******* ** *** 20% - **% *****, with *** ***** **%. Comments ********:

  • "[*** *****] ** ******* about **%".
  • "** ***** **** ** see * **% ******. Depending ** *** **** of *** ******* *** the ********, ** ***** a ********* **** **** relationship, ** ***** **** down **** **%-**% ******."
  • "** *** *** *******, we *** **%"
  • "**% *** **** ****. *** competitive ********* *** ******** margins ******* **** ****."
  • "******* *** ****** ** around **%."
  • "*** *****, *** ******* 35% ****** **** **** depending **** ****** ** systems, ****** ** ******* installed ********* **********."

Software ***** ******* ********** ********

** ********, ******** ***** ****** markups ****** ** ** higher **** ***** ****, with **** ********* **% - **%, *** **** trending **** ******. ******** included:

  • "** **** ********** ********* with *** ********* ***** means ******** **% ******* on *********."
  • "***** ******* **** **** 35-55% ** ******"
  • "**%, ********* ***** ** be ***********"
  • "*** ******* **** ** is **%. **** *** remained ****** ********, ******** only *** *** ****** (50+ ****) ****."
  • "*** **-**% ****** *** remained ****** ********."

Maintenance ********* **********

** *******, ******* ** recurring *** ********* ******** agreements ** ******* **** of ********** * ******, but ** *** ********* for ** ****** *******. *** ******'* ****** *** either ** ***** *** typical **** *****, ****** digit *********** ** * straight ****-******* **** ** the *** ****, **** the **** ** ******** coming **** ********** ***** or ******* ******* ** *** ******.

*****'* ********* ****** ******** ******* Agreement (***) ****** **** ~$300 *** ***** ******* with *** *********** ******* to ~$**,***+ *** ********** versions. *** *********** ***-******* upgrades *** ******* ***** are ******* ** *** SUP, *** ** ** the ********** ******'* ********** to ******* ******* ******* an ***.

******** *****'* ********* ******* ******** *********** ******* generally **** ***** ******* 20% - **% ** the ***** ***** ** a ******'* ******** ********, as ****** ** $** for ***** ******* **** ~ * *****, ******* of $**,*** *** *****, multisite, ** ******* ********** systems.  ** **** *****, this ********* **** ** valid ** ***** ** receive ********* ******** ******** and ******* **** ******* technicians.

Market *******

** ******* **** ******* aside, **** ********* **** tangible ******* ******** **** increasing ***********. ******* **** the ********* ***** *******, *** ******* ******** *********** *****, **** ***** *** Software ***** ********* **** themselves ******* **** ******* not ******* ** ***** offerings.

*******, *** *** ******** interoperability ********** ***** ** Software ***** *******' *****. Despite *** **** '****-**' being ** ********* ****** in ******** **** ****** platform, *** **** ** changing **** * ***** system ** **** *********, due ** ** ****** population ** ********** ********* that *** ****-**** ******** as *********.

**** ******** ***** ***** strictly ***********, *** ***** of * ****** *********** equal *** ******** ** entirely *** ********, ***** can *** ******** *** opening **** ** * takeover ******* (*.*., *** new ******* ***** *******) *** ****.

Comments (7)

Totalling the scorecards gives Lenel a marginal edge over SH*, yet from the standpoint of the dealer at least, SH seems more attractive.

  1. Equally competitive on price
  2. Better margins
  3. More lock-in

Lenel might be easier to sell since it is more open, but I'm not sure how important that is in these types of systems.

Is it easier to become a Lenel dealer, perhaps?

*6 Greens, 3 Reds, 0 Yellows vs 6 Greens, 2 Reds, 1 Yellow

This is useful information. I'd really like to know how they compare in terms of customer satisfaction and ease of use though, especially against other enterprise systems. I know it's hard to set up that kind of testing with end users, but without taking the complete user experience into consideration, it's hard to determine value.

One access control company that always seems to get ignored is Kantech (manufacture their own hardware). Tyco has owned and operated two seemingly competitive access control companies Kantech and Software House. I wonder if the Johnson Controls merger will change this and they can work on development of just one platform.

Kantech isn't ignored. For example, see: Tyco Kantech Access Control Company Profile.

One big structural difference is that Software House is a dealer-only offering, but Kantech is widely available through distribution. While CCure is often used in large, high-end deployments, Kantech is suited for smaller, more basic access systems.

The Tyco Kantech/Software House issue is similar to the Honeywell WinPak/Pro-Watch line up, also. One distribution line, one dealer line. Ingersoll Rand used to be the same way also when they had their enterprise line which was dealer, and then Bright Blue through distro.

It seems to be getting less common, though.

I work for a company that is a dealer for both Lenel and Software House.

This is a good comparison. The point of open hardware being one of the bigger differences is true.

The good part of open hardware is that the end user can switch to another software platform if they get frustrated with Lenel. The good part of proprietary hardware, as Software House has shown, is that they control the hardware development and are able to bring hardware enhancement to market more quickly.

I support small, medium, and large systems on both platforms. Each product and each manufacturer has good points and issues. One of the prime determining factors should be the functionality that the customer, the end user, needs and the capability of the dealer to deliver and support a system that functions in the manner that the customer expects.

Point - the software support agreement for a small Lenel system is in line with the Software House support costs. Throwing in the cost of software enhancements isn't a reasonable comparison unless you add those costs into the Software House side.

SWH > LENEL - - - - - - GGS!!!! !!! !!! Nailed It!

Enter 2020, let us re-evaluate!

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,367 reports, 855 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

End User Buying Axis At Prices Better Than Axis Gold on Jan 10, 2020
IPVM recently found an integrator contract with an end-user that guaranteed the end user could buy Axis products at a price / discount better than...
Directory of Access Reader Manufacturers on Nov 27, 2019
Credential Readers are one of the most visible and noticeable parts of access systems, but installers often stick with only the brand they always...
Open Access Controller Guide (Axis, HID, Isonas, Mercury) on Sep 19, 2019
In the access control market, there are many software platforms, but only a few companies that make non-proprietary door controllers. Recently,...
Axis Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 26, 2019
Despite more product shortages, but strengthened by increasing cybersecurity and China concerns, Axis' favorability, amongst 200+ integrators in...
ASIS Offering Custom Research For Manufacturers on Nov 15, 2018
Manufacturers often want to know what industry people think about trends and, in particular, the segments and product they offer.  ASIS and its...
Improving Project Registration Guide on Sep 29, 2017
Manufacturers want integrators to register large projects. Integrators want the discounts that come with registration, but not some of the other...
Manufacturer Sales People Are Very Important - Statistics on Jun 26, 2017
IPVM's integrator statistics show what sales people say regularly: Sales people are very important. From 150 integrator responses: While...
Arecont Claims Best Project Registration Program on Mar 08, 2017
Arecont's project registration program [link no longer available] is literally like nothing IPVM has ever seen. Despite our historical...
Access Control Markups 2016 on Nov 09, 2016
  Access control markups have remained solid, according to new IPVM integrator survey results. Response Breakdowns We asked...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Verkada: "IPVM Should Never Be Your Source of News" on Jul 02, 2020
Verkada was unhappy with IPVM's recent coverage declaring that reading IPVM is 'not a good look' and that 'IPVM should never be your source of...
Vintra Presents FulcrumAI Face Recognition on Jul 02, 2020
Vintra presented its FulcrumAI face recognition and mask detection offering at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. Inside this report: A...
Uniview Wrist Temperature Reader Tested on Jul 02, 2020
Uniview is promoting measuring wrist temperatures whereas most others are just offering forehead or inner canthus measurements. But how well does...
Dahua USA Admits Thermal Solutions "Qualify As Medical Devices" on Jul 02, 2020
Dahua USA has issued a press release admitting a controversial point in the industry but an obvious one to the US FDA, that the thermal temperature...
Access Control Online Show - July 2020 - With 40+ Manufacturers - Register Now on Jul 01, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our July 2020 Access Control Show. With 40+ companies presenting across 4 days, this is a unique opportunity to hear...
Hanwha Face Mask Detection Tested on Jul 01, 2020
Face mask detection or, more specifically lack-of-face-mask detection, is an expanding offering in the midst of coronavirus. Hanwha in partnership...
UK Government Says Fever Cameras "Unsuitable" on Jul 01, 2020
The UK government's medical device regulator, MHRA, told IPVM that fever-seeking thermal cameras are "unsuitable for this purpose" and recommends...
Camera Course Summer 2020 on Jun 30, 2020
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training...
Worst Over But Integrators Still Dealing With Coronavirus Problems (June Statistics) on Jun 30, 2020
While numbers of integrators very impacted by Coronavirus continue to drop, most are still moderately dealing with the pandemic's problems, June...