ADT's Top Dealer "The Defenders" Sued 20+ Times

By: Dan Gelinas, Published on May 07, 2019

ADT's largest authorized dealer, The Defenders, has been sued more than 20 times since 2012, IPVM has verified through analyzing legal records.

In February 2019, we examined how ADT And 'The Defenders' Silent About Massive Complaints and was tipped off to numerous lawsuits by ex-Defenders employees.

In this note, we examine:

  • 20 lawsuits reviewed (with a spreadsheet and links to complaints and answers from court records)
  • 3 key themes: Employee Grievances, Customer Grievances, Violations of the TCPA
  • How one plaintiff asked for a permanent injunction on ADT and Defenders to combat their "unconscionable contracts"
  • Most cases settled out of court
  • Response from the Defenders And ADT
  • ADT sued in half of these cases, as well

***'* ******* ********** ******,*** *********, *** **** **** more **** ** ***** since ****, **** *** verified ******* ********* ***** records.

** ******** ****, ** examined ****** *** '*** *********' Silent ***** ******* ************* *** ****** *** to ******** ******** ** ex-Defenders *********.

** **** ****, ** examine:

  • ** ******** ******** (**** a *********** *** ***** to ********** *** ******* from ***** *******)
  • * *** ******: ******** Grievances, ******** **********, ********** of *** ****
  • *** *** ********* ***** for * ********* ********** on *** *** ********* to ****** ***** "************** contracts"
  • **** ***** ******* *** of *****
  • ******** **** *** ********* And ***
  • *** **** ** **** of ***** *****, ** well

[***************]

**********

***** *** ********* ** certainly *** **** ***** than ***, **** *** certainly * **** ********* of ***'* ******** ***** **** *** ****** report*********:

* *********** ******* ** our ******** ********* **** a ******* ****** ** such ***** *******, ********* an ********** ******* ******** that ****** *nine-year ******* ********* **** ** ** ******** **** *** ********* *** ************* **% ** *** our new accounts in 2017.

********, *** ********* ** tightly ******* *** *** relationship **** ***** ******* shows *** ******* **** in *** **** ***** a *******'* *** **** would ******** ** ******:

*** ********* ********* ******* of $***+ ******* *** 2018, ********* *** ***** **** ******.

20 ********** ****** **** ****

**** ********** ********** ********:

**** **** **** * main ******:

  • ******** ********** ******* ** unfair ***, *****, *** wrongful ***********: * **********
  • ******** ********** ******* ** fraud, ******, ********** (********* allegedly ******* *****), ****** of ********, ********** *** racism, *** "************** *** oppressive" *********: * **********
  • ******** ********** ******* ** violations ** ************ ******** ********** *** (TCPA): * **********
  • ************, *** ***** ********* was ***** ** ******** competitor*** ********.

*** ** ** ****** at *** *** ********** since ** **** ********* lawsuits **** ******* ******* database *****, ********* *** "Defenders" *** "******* **** Home" ** *** *********. We *** *** ****** in *** ***** ***** systems **** ***** ******, for *******. ****, ***** have **** ***** ******* Defenders ***** ******** ********* pseudonyms. ** *** ********* ***** ** *** Security *** ************ ***:

********* ******** ******** ******* does ******** ***** ******** assumed *****, ********* "******* Your ****," "*********," "******** Direct," "**** ********," "**** Blue ***** *********," "**** Energy ***** ***," "**** Home," "****.****," "**** **** Security," "********," "**** ********" and "**** *********."

** *** ** ** looked **, * **** still **** ** *** time ** ******* *** one ** ***** *** due ** ***** ** the *** ** ***. All ***** ***** **** settled *** ** *****.

How ** ****** ******* ****** ** *** ** ********

**** ******** **** ******** from ******* ** *** original********* ***** ****** ** our ******** ****. *** ****** ****** a ******* **** ***** us **** ******** ***** filed ******* *** *** the ********* *** ***** and **** *** **********, as **** ** *** screenshot *****:

Most ***** ******* *** ** ***** & ********* **** *********

** *** ********* ***** that **** ****** ****** settled *** ** *****, most **** *********** *********"**** *********," ***** ******* means **** * ********* settlement *** ********** *** ********* ** giving ** ***/*** ***** to *** *****. "******* prejudice" ***** *** ********* reserves *** ***** ** sue *****. **** *** case, * **** ********* complaint, *** *********** ********* without *********.

Customer ********** *******

**** *. *** *** et ** (***** ******)(***+):**************** ****'* ********* ** which *** *********** ******* pro ** **************** (*** ******* **** Home) *** *** *** guilty ** ******, *****, and ********** ***** ** "unconscionable" ******** ** ***** contracts. *** **** *** $1.2 ******* *** ** injunction ******* **** ***** business *** ************ *** objectionable ******** ********, ** seen ** *** ********* excerpt **** **** **:

*** ********** **** ************* 6.5 ******* ********* ** the ****** ****** *** Canada. * ***** ****** or ******* ***** ** behalf ** **** ** these *.* ******* ********* of *** *** ******* Your **** ** ***********, inefficient *** ***** ****** burden *** ******** ******. Upon ***** ******* ** this *******, *** ********* requests *** ***** ***** enter ** ***** *** apermanent ********** *********** *** ********* *** ********** **** ******** ** *** *********, ********** *** ********** ******** ********* ********* ** **** ********* *** **** ******** **** ***** ********* ** ***** ******** ******** **** *** ************** *** ********** ***** *** **********. (emphasis added)

************* ** ***** ************** *** ***********, ** seen ** *** ********* from **** *:

********** *** ***, */*/* ADT ******** ******** (“***”); and *********, ***. (*/*/* Defender ******** *******), */*/* Protect **** **** (“*********”), by *** ******* *********** counsel, ************ **** **** and ***** ********** ** Plaintiff’s (****** *******) ********* (“Complaint”).

***********, **** **** **** their ******** **** ***** and **** ******** ** the ******** *** ********* signed:

********** ******** **** *** applicable **** *** ********* in ********** *** **** owed ** *********, ***** duties *** *** ***** and ********** *********** ** written *********.

****'* ******* **** *** closed ********* **, ****, and *** **** *********** **** ** *** Circuit ***** ** *** County, ******* ** ** ***** ongoing.

**** **** **** **** ADT *** *** ********* are ********** ***** **** every ******** **** ******* with * *** ********:

**** *** ********** *****. They **** *** ******** you **** ** **** to *** *** ** agree *** **** ** their *********, **** **** all **** **** .... They *** ********** ******** because ** *** ***** how ** **** ***** contracts. *** **** ****** I **** ** ** that *’* * ******.

********, **** **** *** ADT ******** *** ****** hard ** ******:

***** **** ********* **** wrong **** **** *** their ******** *** **** win. *** ******** ** unconscionable *** * ***** that ***** **** ** fraud. ****’** * ******** defendant *** *’** **** fighting **** *** * years, *** * ***’* find ****** ** **** me, ******* *** ** such * **** ************ to *****.

***** *. *** ***, and *********, ***., */*/* Protect **** ****:

*** ******** ************** ******* ********* ********** installed ***** *********** *** *********'* ******** where ** *** *** detect ***** **** * malfunctioning ***-************ **** ******** that ****** ****, ********** killing * ****** *** severely ******** *** ********:

*** **** *****/***** ******** installed ** *** ******** wall ** *** ***** residence *** *********** ********* by ********** *** *** and *********, ***. */*/* PROTECT **** ****, ** and ******* ***** ******, servants ***/** *********.

***********, *** ********* ****** that *** ********, *********, and ***** *********** ** the ****** “******** ****** by ******” ** *** Defendant’s “************, ************, *** negligence”:

*** ********* ********** *** resulting ******* ******** ** the ****** ********** *.*. and *.*., *** ********* decedent ******* *. ***** occurred ****** ** ****** of *** ************, ************ and ********** ** *** defendants, *** *** *** DEFENDERS, ***. */*/* ******* YOUR ****, ***** ******, servants ***/** *********

*** ************ ***** ********** *** ****** *** allegations, *** *******, *** they ***'* **** ****** information ** ****** ******* or *** *** *********** are ****:

*** ******* *****. ********* Defendans **** ****** ********* or *********** ********** ** form * ****** ** to *** ***** ** the *********** ********* ** the ********* ********* "***" of *********'* *********.

*** ******* ******. ********* Defendans **** ****** ********* or *********** ********** ** form * ****** ** to *** ***** ** the *********** ********* ** the ********* ********* "***" of *********'* *********.

*** ***** ********* *** filed ******** *, ****, and ** ** ***** 29th, **** ** ***** open.

Employee ********** *******

****** *. *********, ***. et **:

*** *********, ** ******* technician **** ** ****** at *********,****** **** ** ******** a ****** ******* ********* **** *** **** symptoms **** ***** **** made *********** ********* ** work *********. ** ********* time ***, ****** ** by * ******'* ****. His ********** ****** *** request *** ******** *** tech ****** ** **** immediately, ****** *** **** when *** **** ***** to ****** ******'* ****** as **** ** **** excerpt **** **** **:

**. ******* ****** **** knowledge ** *********’* ******* medical ********* *** ********** documentation, *** ******* ******** on *********’* ******** *********** Form **** ********* ***** called ** ******** ********** of *** *********, ****** and ******** ********** ********** against ********* ** *********** his ********** **** ******** for ********** *** *********** protected ****** ***** *** Family *** ******* ***** Act.

*** ********* **** ******* that *** ********** *** paid ***** **** *** his **** *** **** his *** **** ****** out ** ***** $**.**/****. The ********* ****** ** regularly ****** ~** *****/**** and **** ***** *** Fair ***** ******** *** he ** **** **** overtime.

********* ** ***** ******** simply **** *** ***********:

********* ********* ********* **, Defendant ****** *** *********’* allegations.

TCPA ********* ********** *******

*** **** ** * law ****** ** **** that ***** ** ******* unsolicited, ********* ***** *****. The *** ****** **** calls ******* ******** ******** consent *** ********* ******* unsolicited ***** **** ****** strict *****, *** ***** the******** ** *** **** Registry. *** **** **** allows *********** ** *** a ******* **** **** not ****** *** **** guidelines.

******* *. ***, *** et **:

*** ********* ***** * TCPA ********* ********* ******* ADT *** ******** ********** ***** *** ****** the ************** *********** ********* ******* ****** (ATDS)**** * *********** ***/** artificial ***** ** **** multiple *********** ***** ***** to *** ********* ******* her ***** *******:

**. **** ** ***** call *** ** ** with *** *** *** content ** **** *** every *** ** **********’ calls ** ************* *** same: “**** ** ** important ******* **** ******* Your ****, **** ********** ADT ******."

*** ********* **** ******* how *** ********* ******* the **********' *********** ******:

**. ************, ********* ********* her ******** ********* ******* provider ** *** **** the ***** ** *******.

***********, *** ********* ******* that **** ****** *** Defendants' *********** ****** *** blocked, **** ***** ***** a ********* *********** ******:

**. ***, **** ****** the **-*** ****** *** elapsed, **********, ** ** apparent ****** ** ******* Plaintiff’s ******* ** ***** the *****, ******* ***** tactic *** ***** ******* calls ** ********* ***** a ********* *********** ****** than *** *** ********* had ********* ** *******.

*** ********** ** ***** answer ** ********* ** of *** ********* ***** to ****** *****, *** deny *** *********** ** the *********:

********* ****** **** **** telephone ***** **** ******** by ** ********** ***** others **** *********** ** voicemail. ****** ** ********* admitted ******, ********* ****** the *********** ** **** paragraph.

** ******** ** ********* 35, *** ********** *** they "**** ********** *********" to ****** ******* *** allegations ** **** ** not *** ** "****** them":

********* ***** ********** ********* or *********** ** **** a ****** ** ** the ***** ** *** allegations ** **** ********* and, ***********, ****** **** allegations.

*** ********** ****** **** the **** ********* ***** using * ********* *********** number:

********* ****** **** *********.

Response **** *** *********

********* **** *** ***** not ******* ** *** suits:

** *** ***** ** DEFENDERS *** *** **** work *** **** ******** every *** ** **** families ****** *** ******* safe.

** ************ ******* ** DEFENDERS **** *** ******* publicly ** ******* ** pending ********** ** ******.

Response **** ***

*** **** *** ****** to ***, ******* **** we ***** **** ** "work **** ********* ** this."

ADT **** ** **** ** ***** *****

*** ** ***** ** a **-********* ** ** of *** ** ******** we ****** **.

Comments (2)

*** * *** ** ADT, *** ** *** several ******* **** **** set ** **** ** our ****. ** ********** goes **** ** *** as ****. *** **** has *******.

****, *** ********* **** President ** **********, *** Young, *** ******** ********* President ** *** ******** Alarm *********** ***** ** TMA-The ********** *********** (******** CSAA). ******* ******* *** a ****** ******** ** ADT **** * ***** of ** **** .. “….we **** **** ***** Associations ** ** *** dirty ****…”. **** *** we ****** *** ** his/their *** **** ****?

Login to read this IPVM report.

Related Reports

IPVM Rejects Feevr's Improper Threats And Demands on May 04, 2020
IPVM categorically rejects Feevr's improper threats and demands submitted...
Trade Groups Request NDAA Blacklist Delay Citing Coronavirus on Apr 06, 2020
Two trade groups representing government contractors have asked Congress to...
Worst Over But Integrators Still Dealing With Coronavirus Problems (June Statistics) on Jun 30, 2020
While numbers of integrators very impacted by Coronavirus continue to drop,...
JCI Sues Genetec For Patent Infringement on Jul 13, 2020
Surprisingly, security giant JCI has sued their partner, security software...
UK ICO Approves Unconsented Facial Recognition At Security Conferences on Feb 05, 2020
The UK's data protection agency has declined IPVM's GDPR complaint against...
Dahua Critical Cloud Vulnerabilities on May 12, 2020
Dahua has acknowledged a series of cloud vulnerabilities that researcher...
Hikvision Admits Sanctions Harming Its Financial Performance on Mar 27, 2020
While Hikvision initially downplayed being sanctioned for human rights...
The US Fight Over Facial Recognition Explained on Jul 08, 2020
The controversy around facial recognition has grown significantly in 2020,...
NDAA Blacklist Delay Amendment Fails on Jul 24, 2020
The Blacklist Clause, which bans Hikvision/Dahua/Huawei users from doing...
Pivot3 Mass Layoffs on Mar 27, 2020
Pivot3 has conducted mass layoffs, the culmination of grand hopes, a quarter...
Integrators Hard Hit By Coronavirus on Mar 18, 2020
Integrators are already being hard hit by Coronavirus as brand new IPVM...
Milestone Drops ISC West on Mar 06, 2020
Milestone has dropped ISC West, joining a long list of companies to cancel...
Dahua Sues Ex-North American President, Says Legal Typo on Jun 03, 2020
Dahua's former North American President Frank Zhang claims he is owed almost...
Wrong Dahua Australia Medical Device Approved on Jul 20, 2020
Dahua's body temperature system is now in Australia's medical device...
Vape Detection Legal Battle: Soter Sues IPVideo Corp on Jul 22, 2020
The crosstown vape detection rivals are now in a legal battle. While IPVideo...

Recent Reports

Taiwan Lilin NDAA Compliant Cameras Tested on Aug 13, 2020
Taiwan-based manufacturer Lilin is taking direct aim at Dahua and Hikvision...
White House Expands Dahua Hikvision Blacklist To Federal Funding on Aug 13, 2020
The White House is expanding the NDAA to blacklist anyone who "uses" banned...
Actual Coronavirus Testing Options Examined on Aug 13, 2020
Fever cameras have emerged as an indirect and flawed way to test for...
Video Analytics Online Show September 2020 Opened - Axis, Avigilon, Bosch, BriefCam, Genetec, Milestone + 30 More on Aug 12, 2020
IPVM's sixth online show will feature 35+ Video Analytics companies...
The German Company Powering Many China Temperature Tablets (Heimann) on Aug 12, 2020
Many fever tablet suppliers market German-made Heimann thermal sensors while...
Salesforce Drops Dahua and Hikvision on Aug 12, 2020
Salesforce has dropped Dahua and Hikvision as customers, forcing the two mega...
Access Control Course Fall 2020 - Register Now on Aug 12, 2020
IPVM offers the most comprehensive access control course in the industry....
Genetec CEO Declares "We Don't Negotiate Payment With Patent Trolls" on Aug 11, 2020
Are patent trolls like terrorists? Genetec's CEO is coming out strongly...
Hanwha AI Analytics Camera Tested on Aug 11, 2020
Hanwha has released their Wisenet P AI camera, adding person and vehicle...
Alabama Schools Million Dollar Hikvision Fever Camera Deal on Aug 11, 2020
The Baldwin County, Alabama public schools purchased a $1 million, 144-camera...
Dahua Taunts Australian Government, Continues To Sell Illegal Fever Cameras on Aug 10, 2020
Dahua is effectively taunting the Australian government by continuing to sell...
HID Releases VertX Replacement Aero on Aug 10, 2020
HID is replacing two established and broadly supported types of access...
NDAA Compliant Video Surveillance Whitelist on Aug 10, 2020
This report aggregates video surveillance products that manufacturers have...
Telpo China Temperature Tablets Tested on Aug 10, 2020
The provider for overseas companies ranging from Canon Singapore to US'...
Dangerous Hikvision Fever Camera Showcased by Chilean City on Aug 07, 2020
Deploying a fever camera outdoors, in the rain, with no black body, is...