Hikvision Lobbying Against And Preparing For Potential US SanctionsBy Charles Rollet, Published on Sep 09, 2019
Hikvision has been lobbying against and preparing for potential US sanctions, according to US government records, financial filings and partner documentation IPVM has found.
In this report, we examine what Hikvision has done and how it is positioning itself.
- What lobbying Hikvision has done?
- How that lobbying could impact sanctions?
- What inventory preparations has Hikvision made?
- What contractual changes has Hikvision made?
Reason for Possible Sanctions
Hikvision has come under scrutiny for its massive surveillance deals in Xinjiang equipping cities, mosques, and 're-education' camps. Since September 2018, reports have said Hikvision has been considered for sanctions by the US government over this, and, in May 2019, the Trump administration was widely reported to be closer to doing so, though it has not yet happened.
However, Hikvision has been taking this seriously.
Type of Sanctions Possible
Hikvision could be barred from using most US technology if it is added to the 'Entity List', the same sanction imposed on Huawei. In the case of even stricter Magnitsky sanctions, Hikvision could be completely banned from the US and its assets there frozen.
New Xinjiang Lobbying
In August 2018, Hikvision hired lobbying firm Mercury Public Affairs on a $70,000 per month contract for NDAA-related issues. But Hikvision's Mercury lobbyists are also working on the Xinjiang sanctions issue, as shown in a June Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) filing, which disclosed numerous contacts mentioning the topic:
The contacts are the following:
- On December 7, Mercury lobbyist and former Trump campaign official Bryan Lanza called State Department official Pam Pryor "re: Hikvision Xinjiang issue". Pryor is also a former Trump campaign official who is now a "Senior Advisor on Global Justice Issues" at State.
- On December 11, Mercury lobbyist Deirdre Stach called Will Strother, legislative aide to Tennessee Congressman Chuck Fleischmann about the status of HR7123 Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act. This bill, if passed, could lead the way to Hikvision sanctions by requiring a list of Chinese companies involved in the "provision or operation of surveillance technology or operations" in Xinjiang.
- On May 22, Lanza called Pryor at State "re: Hikvision Xinjiang issue" again.
- On May 22, Mercury lobbyist and former Montana Republican congressman Denny Rehberg called and texted Commerce Department official Peter Krug on "possible Commerce Dept. actions against Hikvision". Krug is a senior legislative advisor at Commerce's patent and trademark office.
- On May 23, Rehburg called and texted Peter Krug again.
Activists Respond: Americans Helping Hikvison "Horrifying"
Louisa Greve, the director of external affairs at the Uyghur Human Rights Project, told IPVM the fact that Americans were helping Hikvision on this issue was "horrifying":
It's horrifying for Uyghur Americans to know that fellow Americans [are] helping Hikvision avoid accountability for its actions. No company should get away with complicity in crimes against humanity. People are dying in detention, and Hikvision's lawyers and lobbyists need to think about the judgment of history.
Aside from activists' criticism, the concrete impact of this lobbying is difficult to discern, with no more public information disclosed and no response from Mercury or the government officials who were lobbied to our questions (Hikvision declined to comment).
The Xinjiang lobbying does show Hikvision itself is taking the sanctions threat seriously. From December 2018 to May 2019, Hikvision spent on $659,441 Mercury alone, according to the FARA. Bryan Lanza, the lobbyist handling many of Hikvion's Xinjiang efforts, lobbied for China telecoms giant ZTE last year after it was sanctioned by the US, a decision that was soon reversed, saving ZTE.
Ambarella Mentions Inventory Buildup
In another sign Hikvision is taking potential sanctions seriously, a main SoC supplier Ambarella told investors in a June earnings call stating that its two largest Chinese customers were "accumulating inventory":
I think the upside that we have seen right now is a combination of our Chinese customer accumulating inventory as well as their business getting stronger
I do believe that with the uncertainty of this [...] two customer might get onto Entity List, they will definitely try to build up the inventory level to their comfortable.
Before Huawei was sanctioned by the US, it had reportedly built up 12 months' worth of US parts. This is because Entity List sanctions bar companies from selling US-made components to covered companies.
Hikvision Acknowledges Inventory Buildup
Hikvision, itself, acknowledged a sanctions-driven inventory buildup, telling investors in July:
there has been news about the U.S. export entity list sanctions. So it is a safe and stable move to stockpile raw components. There's no sanction today, but maybe it will suddenly come tomorrow. We need to ensure our productivity to be sustainable. Although we have alternative suppliers, it takes time to switch from one supplier to another. New suppliers also need time to organize production for us. Increasing the stockpile will give us the elasticity for our business operations. [emphasis added]
New Terms and Conditions
Hikvision has also added new language about sanctions to its terms and conditions, indicating concern they may get sanctioned if their equipment is found in the wrong place:
COMPLIANCE WITH IMPORT AND EXPORT REGULATIONS Customer hereby confirms that it shall be in compliance with any relevant import and export regulations, or economic sanctions including but not limited to the Export Administration Regulations of U.S.A., and U.S Economic Sanctions for use, sell, transfer, export or reexport of those Products. Customer further confirms and undertakes that the Products shall not (i) be resold to Target Countries’ government buyers or to any other buyers in Target Countries for use by such governments to engage in surveillance, censorship, or network disruption activities, or (ii) be resold to any individual or entity that is listed on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (an “SDN”) or the Foreign Sanctions Evaders List (an “FSE”) both maintained by the Office Of Foreign Assets Control of The U.S. Department of the Treasury, and the Denied Persons List or Entity List maintained by the U.S. Department of Commerce(all together as “Black List”), or is controlled or fifty percentage or more owned, directly or indirectly, by one or more Black List(s), or(iii) be resold or used in relation to weapons of mass destruction, or the development and/or production of chemical or biological weapons, or activities in the context or related to any nuclear explosive, or unsafe nuclear fuel-cycle activity.  “Target Countries” means the countries and territories covered by the most comprehensive territorial U.S. economic sanctions, currently, the Crimea region, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, and Syria [emphasis added]
A common way for the US government to sanction a company is by finding deals with countries like Iran and North Korea (as happened with Huawei and ZTE.) These sanctions are much easier to impose compared to ones for doing business in Xinjiang, where there are currently zero US regulations preventing commercial activities. The updated Hikvision T&C's repeated mention of "target countries" shows clear concern for such a scenario.
Hikvision Decline To Comment
We asked Hikvision for responses to all the above but they declined to comment.
It is difficult to tell if such sanctions will actually take place, with the US-China trade war a major factor. Xinjiang sanctions were reportedly "ready to go" in June but shelved due to trade negotiations (this happened in May as well). Meanwhile, China has reportedly insisted on the removal of existing Huawei sanctions as part of any trade deal. While Hikvision's direct deals in Xinjiang are documented and not in dispute, the rising conflict between these two countries is a central factor.
Customers Take Note
Either way, Hikvision's lobbying, inventory, and legal language all show the firm is preparing for US sanctions. This is certainly a justified move from the company, as such actions would threaten not only its reputation but also its supply chain. If Hikvision itself is preparing for such a scenario, its customers should take notice as well.
Vote / Poll