Hikvision Cloud Security Vulnerability Uncovered

By: Brian Karas, Published on Dec 05, 2016

A security researcher uncovered a critical vulnerability in Hikvision's global cloud servers. This vulnerability allowed an attacker to remotely take over the server and get access to sensitive customer data. This is newer and different than Hikvision's security issues in 2015 and before and has not been disclosed by Hikvision.

Iraklis Mathiopoulos [link no longer available], the researcher who uncovered this, reported the issue to Hikvision, and provided additional perspective to IPVM regarding this issue and Hikvision's handling of it.

Full details of the vulnerability, our analysis of Hikvision's server weakness, and what this means for the security of users with Hikvision cameras on their network is covered in this report.

* ******** ********** ********* a ******** ************* ** Hikvision's ****** ***** *******. This ************* ******* ** attacker ** ******** **** over *** ****** *** get ****** ** ********* customer ****. **** ** newer *** ********* **** Hikvision's ******** ******** **** *** ********* *** *** **** disclosed ** *********.

******* ************ [**** ** longer *********], *** ********** who ********* ****, ******** the ***** ** *********, and ******** ********** *********** to **** ********* **** issue *** *********'* ******** of **.

**** ******* ** *** vulnerability, *** ******** ** Hikvision's ****** ********, *** what **** ***** *** the ******** ** ***** with ********* ******* ** their ******* ** ******* in **** ******.

[***************]

Vulnerability ********

[**** ** ****** *********]

*************' **** ********* *** the ************* *** **********, ** ********* ** as ***** (*** ******** ******) vulnerability, *** ** ***** an ******** *** **** commands ** * ****** that ** ********* ** XML ****. *** ********* XML **** ******** ******** that *** ****** ******* the **** ********, ********* data ** *** ********.

*** **** ******, ************ created * ******* ****** to ******* ******** ****, spoofing ** *** **** to ****** ******* ** a ****** ******* (**** a ***** ***** [**** no ****** *********] ******, a ********* ***). **** XML *** **** ** the***-******.*** ******, ***** *** **** credentials *** ****** ***** use **** ************* **** the ******, *** ********** a ******* ****** *** hik-online.com ****** ** **** the ******** ** * file (/***/*****) **** ** his ******* ******.

*** ******** **** *********'* server, ******* *** ******** of *** ***** **** highlighted ** *** ****, as ***** *****:

*** ********** ********* **** a ********* ******** ***** have **** ****** ********* this ************* **** ********** customer **** ****** ** the ******, ** *********** using ** ** "****" the ****** *** **** full ****** ** *** server. **** ***** **** be ****** **** ** attack ** ********'* *******, accessing **** ***** ** even ******* **** ********* *************.

********** ***-******.*** ******* ***** give ******* ****** ** IP ********* *** ***** of ********-********* ********* ******* as **** ** ********* and ********* ********** **** the *******.

15 **** ** *******

*** ********** **** ********* did *** **** ****** enough ******, **** ********** 15 **** ***** ** his *** ***** ******* when ** *** ********* emails **** ****:

************ ********* ** *********'* security ********:

*** ************** ** ********* was ** *** **** side, ***** **** **** are ******** ** **** a ********* ******** ****.

***** *** **** ****** of ***** ******** ********* Hikvision ********** *** **** of *** '********* ******** Response ******' (****), *******, emails ***** **** *** responded.

Resolved *** *** ***** ********* ********

** *** ******** ****, Hikvision ***** *** ************* two **** ***** *** researcher ******* *** ** and ********* ******** *** one *** ***** ********* acknowledged *******.

Hikvision ********, *** *** *********

********* *** *********** ** ******* *********** from ********* ******* **** to *****, *** **** *** vulnerability ** * ******** server ************* ****** **** a **** ** ********* intent ** *********'* ****.

*******, ** ***** **** been *********. **** ***** about **** *************, *** researcher **** **:

*** ********** ************* ***** have **** ********* ** following * ******** ******* that ******** ******* ************* scans. ** ***** **** the ******** **** ** the ****** *** ****** not ****** *** ********, or ** ** *** tested, *** **** *** executed ******.

Default ***** ********** **** ********* ** ****

********* ******* *** ************ being ******* **** *"***** ****" ******* ******* by ************ ********* *** **** that ********* ********* (** those *** *** ****** Hikvision *********'* ***** **************, including *******) ***** ******** access *******, ****** ** customer's ******* ******* ********* knowing.

** ***** ** ******* the ******* ** *********, and *** ********* ** their *******, ********* ***** to ****** ****** ********. This *** ************* ** considered ** ** * basic *******, *** ** is**** ********** ** *** to ******* **** ********** from ***** ********** ** production *******.

Unknown *** **** ** *** **** ********

** ** ******* *** how **** **** ************* existed ** ** ****** before *** ********** *** able ** ********** *********'* cloud **************.

No ******** ** ******** ********

** ***** ********* ********** for * ******** ** this *****, *** ******** no ******** ******** **** Hikvision. *** ***** ** America ******** *** **** lack ** ************** ******* ****** *****:

***** ** ******* ******** no ******** ** ******** attempts ** ******* *********’* headquarters ** ******** *** its ****** ** **********.

Rapid7, *********'* ***** **** - ** *****

********* *** ************ ***** ****** ** security ***** **** ****** to ******* ************* ***********, *** **** ****** to ******* *** ********** information ** *************** **********, and *** **** **** been *********. **** ***** Hikvision *** ******* ************* on **** *** ******** no ******** **** *********. We ********* ****** ** well, *** ********* **** Hikvision *** ****** * customer, *** ************** ***** not ******** *** ******* without ***** ******, *********'*, permission.

Additional *************** ****** ** *****

***** ***** *** *********** of ***** **-*** ************ weaknesses ******** ** *********'* cloud *******, ************ ******** that ***** *** ****** other ******** ******:

**** ** * ********* question ** ****** *** to *** **** ** information. ** * *** to *****, ***** ** the **** ** ************* that *** ********** ***********.***, * ***** *** that ** ** **** likely **** *** **** other ********* ******* **** have ******** **********.

Impact ** *********

********* *** **** ********** by *** ***** ****** since ****: ************* *** China ********** *******, **** the ****** ********** ********* (as *** ********** ***** articles ***** ******** ****** ****).

**** ***** ******* *** nothing ** ** **** the ******* ********** *** it **** **** **** much ** ** **** Hikvision's ******* ************* ************. After ******* **** ** rally ***** *** **** issues *** ********** ** staying *** ** ******** ****** ******** **** damaged *****, ********* ****** ******** how ** ****** ***** such *************** **** **** cloud ***, ******* ************** and ********** ********** ** their ************ ****.

Vote - ****

Comments (30)

I swear I didn't vote very! Lol

I swear I didn't vote very!

So you're saying it was definitely Marty then, eh? ;)

With 151 votes so far, the majority is 'Not very', currently at 79% of the tally.

Whoever did vote 'Very' is in a small minority with just 7% of the total.

FTR, I voted moderately. I don't trust anyone more than moderately tho

what is the hikonline.com server used for? I know it's used for DDNS for the cameras, but is it used for anything else?

For standard Hikvision-branded commercial cameras and recorders (the stuff most integrators here would be dealing with) hik-online.com looks to be primarily a DDNS service.

The researcher said his consumer-oriented OEM camera required the cloud server in order to even view live video, similar to how the Ex-Viz systems work, making it much more involved in the user<=>device connection.

POLL: Should Iraklis Mathiopoulos be compensated for his time and efforts by Hikvision? Agree/Disagree.

But he was compensated:

25/9/16: Received my bounty by post. A 69$ cloud camera.

:)

$69? ADI must not have been running a special that week.

He was compensated, in the form of a free camera that would have cost him $69.

The real question is, is Hikvision's response and payment comparable to other bug bounty programs, and does it provide incentive for other white-hat hackers to spend time testing their systems for them?

I will add my opinion that I think the camera he received is almost worse than no payment. It is like Hikvision saying "we have taken the time to value your contribution, and we feel it is worth very little". Hikvision's cost on that $69 camera is surely even less than the retail value.

Another white-hat researcher reading this might say "It's not worth spending time evaluating Hikvision products/platforms because the company will not compensate me appropriately." This leaves those vulnerabilities open to black-hat attackers, who would NOT disclose them to Hikvision, and instead use them for their own financial gain in other ways, which would likely be a much worse scenario for Hikvision's customers.

Hackerone is a platform that helps coordinate and reward vulnerability discovery. According to them:

We recommend a minimum of $100. The average is around $500 and the current record is $30,000

Related, his reaction to Hikvision's cube camera was not positive:

"I will add my opinion that I think the camera he received is almost worse than no payment. It is like Hikvision saying "we have taken the time to value your contribution, and we feel it is worth very little". Hikvision's cost on that $69 camera is surely even less than the retail value."

You are being too nice...this is like leaving a penny as a tip for a waiter in a fine restaurant.

Only assholes do that kind of stuff.

Hikvision's cost on that $69 camera is surely even less than the retail value.

Not after you back out the subsidy ;)

Just a quick update on this, which I haven't put on my blog.

About 2 weeks ago I received an invoice from TNT. I have to pay them something in the region of 40 GBP for import taxes and admin fees. So yes, I actually lost money on this :-)

Iraklis, we paypal'ed you to cover the import taxes and admin fees. No reason you should have to pay to fix a vendor's problems.

Very nice gesture John. Appreciate it.

I have to pay them something in the region of 40 GBP for import taxes...

Ironically, many U.S. integrators would love a $50 import fee on every Hik camera brought in ;)

I think Hikvision's (flawed) perspective is that a researcher publicly disclosing vulnerabilities hurts their reputation more than it helps them improve their security. Therefore they won't promote it.

I think its the lack of a clear security strategy. They had the opportunity to offer me something in return for a NDA. I'm not taking a hit at Hikvision, unfortunately its a very common symptom that can be observed in many organisations.

Any speculation on what the cost to HIK would have been if the vulnerability had led to a high profile security breach?

If I was rating how companies respond to vulnerabilities their response would be as bad as it gets. They are actively discouraging anyone from taking a closer look - and this doesn't sound like it was a complex hack.

It doesn't surprise me that there are security flaws in security products - it does surprise me that companies don't realize that how they respond to a vulnerability is often MORE important than the vulnerability.

Any speculation on what the cost to HIK would have been if the vulnerability had led to a high profile security breach?

Hard to say, but between time spent internally dealing with the issue, potential lost business, etc., it would likely be a pallet-load worth of $69 cameras at a minimum.

...it would likely be a pallet-load worth of $69 cameras at a minimum.

Double pallet now thru Dec 31.

Any speculation on what the cost to HIK would have been if the vulnerability had led to a high profile security breach?

I would not speculate on the specific cost as it would minimally need to know how many accounts were stored there, what information about those accounts was there, etc.

But there is certainly a real cost in terms of reputation with this. Hikvision has spent a lot of money marketing their cybersecurity in response to the last round of issues. Time helps. It is a lot easier to say, "Yes we had problems but those were (approaching) 2 years ago." Now they need to go back out, defend this and answer more questions about their cybersecurity.

a $69 cloud camera...?? Either it is a slap in the face to offer such a low cost consumer camera, or a LOL that it is a cloud camera going to a network security researcher, or they are trying to silence/teach him a lesson. Once the camera phones home, they can try to PWN his network, as they already control the camera that is now inside his network...

Assuming he 1) actually uses it 2) places it at home and 3) isn't inside a giant honeypot....

One Hikvision cloud camera going on e-bay now.

You think Rapid7 limited response is that what they did was not checking the cloud service, but only perhaps Hikvision professional IPC?

Or does it seems Rapid7 is responsible seeing this issue found was and should of been detected by what should of been highly qualified engineers.

I guess no government likes to be found with egg on their face, or in this case with the pants on the floor.

Chinese companies don't like to pay anything for software, so finding something wrong all be it a serious issue, has even less value than a street vendor selling rat on a stick with suspicious sauce.

Or does it seems Rapid7 is responsible seeing this issue found was and should of been detected by what should of been highly qualified engineers.

It is an interesting question. It would certainly help if Hikvision made it clear what Rapid7 has tested, what they found and how frequently they test (do they test each new firmware release, etc., is it cameras only, etc.).

Albeit?

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/albeit

Eh, I hate to say it, but I can't imagine Dahua being much better about the situation unless someone twists their arm.

I think though...maybe I should ask them to create clear incentives and maintain a clear line of communication for vulnerability disclosures...

However, that would also assume they would be open about their existing vulnerabilities that they are working to address.

Life would just be so much better if more companies were clear and open about their software development roadmap. I can imagine if any surveillance manufacturer had their crap together like LibreOffice they'd be on top of our collective lists here in a heartbeat.

Or, implement something similar to the GDPR

Few things in life make C level execs more focused than potential multi-million EUR/USD fines.

Iraklis,

Thank you very much for your work on this and for your disclosure. It sounds like you gave Hikvision a fair amount of time to respond, and the fact that they did not, says a lot. Although we do not utilize Hikvision, this should be a wake up call for all other camera and IoT device manufacturers, that there are many White Hat hackers carrying out their own projects. Surely there are other camera manufacturers out there with this and other vulnerabilities, but when notified of a breach, we expect them to react swiftly.

I surely don't envy the work and due diligence necessary on the manufacturing side, but maybe we pay a few bucks more per camera to ensure we are dealing with viable manufacturers that protect us and themselves.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

China DVR/NVR Backdoor Discovered, Huawei Refutes on Feb 07, 2020
A backdoor was found in Chinese-produced DVRs and NVRs that secretly allowed access to the recorders. While it was first attributed to Huawei...
Remote Access (DDNS vs P2P vs VPN) Usage Statistics 2019 on Oct 25, 2019
Remote access can make systems more usable but also more vulnerable. How are integrators delivring remote access in 2019? How many are using...
Dahua New Critical Vulnerability 2019 on Sep 23, 2019
Dahua has quietly admitted 5 new vulnerabilities including 1 critical vulnerability with a 9.8 / 10.0 CVSS score and 2 high vulnerabilities (scored...
Uniview OEM Directory on Sep 11, 2019
This directory lists 20+ companies that OEM products from Uniview, with a graphic and links to company websites below. It does not cover all...
ONVIF Exposure To "Devastating DDoS Attacks" Examined on Sep 06, 2019
ZDnet reported "Protocol used by 630,000 devices can be abused for devastating DDoS attacks", citing exposure of ONVIF devices. And after an...
Warning: Windows 7 Update Crashing NVRs on Aug 26, 2019
Windows 7 updates are causing VMS servers to fail to boot. After running the update, impacted systems do not boot as normal, instead display this...
Critical Vulnerability Across 18+ Network Switch Vendors: Cisco, Netgear, More on Aug 26, 2019
Cisco, Netgear and more than a dozen other brands, including small Asian ones, have been found to share the same critical vulnerability, discovered...
Hikvision OEM Directory on Aug 13, 2019
The Chinese government-owned and US-government banned Hikvision has become the world's largest video surveillance manufacturer and generally hidden...
Dahua Wiretapping Vulnerability on Aug 02, 2019
IPVM has validated, with testing, and from Dahua, that many Dahua cameras have a wiretapping vulnerability. Even if the camera's audio has been...
LifeSafety Power NetLink Vulnerabilities And Problematic Response on May 20, 2019
'Power supplies' are not devices that many think about when considering vulnerabilities but as more and more devices go 'online', the risks for...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Viakoo Presents Cyber Hygiene for Cameras on May 28, 2020
Viakoo presented its 'Cyber Hygiene' and 'Service Assurance' products at the April 2020 IPVM New Products show. Inside this report: A...
Seek Scan Thermal Temperature Screening System ReTested on May 28, 2020
Now that IPVM has tested Dahua, Hikvision, and Sunell, we are returning to Seek, the first blackbody system we tested and retested it with our...
Directory of 106 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on May 28, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers to help you see and research what options are available. There are...
Fever Cameras Are Medical Devices, Per The FDA, Dahua, Feevr, Hikvision, InVid Contrary Claims Are False on May 28, 2020
Fever cameras are medical devices, despite what euphemisms various sellers use. The US FDA clearly categorizes them as medical devices and...
Wyze Raises $10 Million And Seeks Services Expansion on May 27, 2020
Wyze has raised $10 million, the company's first disclosed raise since the $20 million announced at the beginning of 2019. Inside this note,...
Startup Videoloft Presents Cloud Storage on May 27, 2020
Videoloft presented offsite cloud storage at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. A 30-minute video from Videoloft including IPVM...
Directory of 300+ Fever Camera News Reports Globally on May 27, 2020
This global directory tracks 300+ articles about thermal cameras used to detect fevers in response to the coronavirus pandemic. Articles are...
Integrators Rising Against Coronavirus on May 27, 2020
IPVM integrator statistics make it clear - Coronavirus's impact on business is lessening and many are anticipating even better news in weeks...
Netposa Stock Surges 46% After US Human Rights Abuse Sanctions on May 27, 2020
Last Friday, the US government announced it would sanction PRC video management provider NetPosa for being "complicit in human rights violations...
LILIN Presents NDAA-Compliant P2 Cameras on May 26, 2020
Merit LILIN presented its NDAA-compliant P2 camera series at the April 2020 IPVM New Products show. Inside this report: A 30-minute video...