Hikvision Cloud Security Vulnerability Uncovered

By: Brian Karas, Published on Dec 05, 2016

A security researcher uncovered a critical vulnerability in Hikvision's global cloud servers. This vulnerability allowed an attacker to remotely take over the server and get access to sensitive customer data. This is newer and different than Hikvision's security issues in 2015 and before and has not been disclosed by Hikvision.

Iraklis Mathiopoulos, the researcher who uncovered this, reported the issue to Hikvision, and provided additional perspective to IPVM regarding this issue and Hikvision's handling of it.

Full details of the vulnerability, our analysis of Hikvision's server weakness, and what this means for the security of users with Hikvision cameras on their network is covered in this report.

* ******** ********** ********* a ******** ************* ** Hikvision's ****** ***** *******. This ************* ******* ** attacker ** ******** **** over *** ****** *** get ****** ** ********* customer ****. **** ** newer *** ********* **** Hikvision's ******** ******** **** *** ********* *** *** **** disclosed ** *********.

******* ************, *** ********** *** uncovered ****, ******** *** issue ** *********, *** provided ********** *********** ** IPVM ********* **** ***** and *********'* ******** ** it.

**** ******* ** *** vulnerability, *** ******** ** Hikvision's ****** ********, *** what **** ***** *** the ******** ** ***** with ********* ******* ** their ******* ** ******* in **** ******.

[***************]

Vulnerability ********

*************' **** ********* *** the ************* *** **********, ** ********* ** as ***** (*** ******** ******) vulnerability, *** ** ***** an ******** *** **** commands ** * ****** that ** ********* ** XML ****. *** ********* XML **** ******** ******** that *** ****** ******* the **** ********, ********* data ** *** ********.

*** **** ******, ************ created * ******* ****** to ******* ******** ****, spoofing ** *** **** to ****** ******* ** a ****** ******* (**** a***** ***********, * ********* ***). This *** *** **** to ******-******.*** ******, ***** *** **** credentials *** ****** ***** use **** ************* **** the ******, *** ********** a ******* ****** *** hik-online.com ****** ** **** the ******** ** * file (/***/*****) **** ** his ******* ******.

*** ******** **** *********'* server, ******* *** ******** of *** ***** **** highlighted ** *** ****, as ***** *****:

*** ********** ********* **** a ********* ******** ***** have **** ****** ********* this ************* **** ********** customer **** ****** ** the ******, ** *********** using ** ** "****" the ****** *** **** full ****** ** *** server. **** ***** **** be ****** **** ** attack ** ********'* *******, accessing **** ***** ** even ******* **** ********* *************.

********** ***-******.*** ******* ***** give ******* ****** ** IP ********* *** ***** of ********-********* ********* ******* as **** ** ********* and ********* ********** **** the *******.

15 **** ** *******

*** ********** **** ********* did *** **** ****** enough ******, **** ********** 15 **** ***** ** his *** ***** ******* when ** *** ********* emails **** ****:

************ ********* ** *********'* security ********:

*** ************** ** ********* was ** *** **** side, ***** **** **** are ******** ** **** a ********* ******** ****.

***** *** **** ****** of ***** ******** ********* Hikvision ********** *** **** of *** '********* ******** Response ******' (****), *******, emails ***** **** *** responded.

Resolved *** *** ***** ********* ********

** *** ******** ****, Hikvision ***** *** ************* two **** ***** *** researcher ******* *** ** and ********* ******** *** one *** ***** ********* acknowledged *******.

Hikvision ********, *** *** *********

********* *** *********** ** ******* *********** from ********* ******* **** to *****, *** **** *** vulnerability ** * ******** server ************* ****** **** a **** ** ********* intent ** *********'* ****.

*******, ** ***** **** been *********. **** ***** about **** *************, *** researcher **** **:

*** ********** ************* ***** have **** ********* ** following * ******** ******* that ******** ******* ************* scans. ** ***** **** the ******** **** ** the ****** *** ****** not ****** *** ********, or ** ** *** tested, *** **** *** executed ******.

Default ***** ********** **** ********* ** ****

********* ******* *** ************ being ******* **** *"***** ****" ******* ******* by ************ ********* *** **** that ********* ********* (** those *** *** ****** Hikvision *********'* ***** **************, including *******) ***** ******** access *******, ****** ** customer's ******* ******* ********* knowing.

** ***** ** ******* the ******* ** *********, and *** ********* ** their *******, ********* ***** to ****** ****** ********. This *** ************* ** considered ** ** * basic *******, *** ** is**** ********** ** *** to ******* **** ********** from ***** ********** ** production *******.

Unknown *** **** ** *** **** ********

** ** ******* *** how **** **** ************* existed ** ** ****** before *** ********** *** able ** ********** *********'* cloud **************.

No ******** ** ******** ********

** ***** ********* ********** for * ******** ** this *****, *** ******** no ******** ******** **** Hikvision. *** ***** ** America ******** *** **** lack ** ************** ******* ****** *****:

***** ** ******* ******** no ******** ** ******** attempts ** ******* *********’* headquarters ** ******** *** its ****** ** **********.

Rapid7, *********'* ***** **** - ** *****

********* *** ************ ***** ****** ** security ***** **** ****** to ******* ************* ***********, *** **** ****** to ******* *** ********** information ** *************** **********, and *** **** **** been *********. **** ***** Hikvision *** ******* ************* on **** *** ******** no ******** **** *********. We ********* ****** ** well, *** ********* **** Hikvision *** ****** * customer, *** ************** ***** not ******** *** ******* without ***** ******, *********'*, permission.

Additional *************** ****** ** *****

***** ***** *** *********** of ***** **-*** ************ weaknesses ******** ** *********'* cloud *******, ************ ******** that ***** *** ****** other ******** ******:

**** ** * ********* question ** ****** *** to *** **** ** information. ** * *** to *****, ***** ** the **** ** ************* that *** ********** ***********.***, * ***** *** that ** ** **** likely **** *** **** other ********* ******* **** have ******** **********.

Impact ** *********

********* *** **** ********** by *** ***** ****** since ****: ************* *** China ********** *******, **** the ****** ********** ********* (as *** ********** ***** articles ***** ******** ****** ****).

**** ***** ******* *** nothing ** ** **** the ******* ********** *** it **** **** **** much ** ** **** Hikvision's ******* ************* ************. After ******* **** ** rally ***** *** **** issues *** ********** ** staying *** ** ******** ****** ******** **** damaged *****, ********* ****** ******** how ** ****** ***** such *************** **** **** cloud ***, ******* ************** and ********** ********** ** their ************ ****.

Vote - ****

Comments (30)

I swear I didn't vote very! Lol

I swear I didn't vote very!

So you're saying it was definitely Marty then, eh? ;)

With 151 votes so far, the majority is 'Not very', currently at 79% of the tally.

Whoever did vote 'Very' is in a small minority with just 7% of the total.

FTR, I voted moderately. I don't trust anyone more than moderately tho

what is the hikonline.com server used for? I know it's used for DDNS for the cameras, but is it used for anything else?

For standard Hikvision-branded commercial cameras and recorders (the stuff most integrators here would be dealing with) hik-online.com looks to be primarily a DDNS service.

The researcher said his consumer-oriented OEM camera required the cloud server in order to even view live video, similar to how the Ex-Viz systems work, making it much more involved in the user<=>device connection.

POLL: Should Iraklis Mathiopoulos be compensated for his time and efforts by Hikvision? Agree/Disagree.

But he was compensated:

25/9/16: Received my bounty by post. A 69$ cloud camera.

:)

$69? ADI must not have been running a special that week.

He was compensated, in the form of a free camera that would have cost him $69.

The real question is, is Hikvision's response and payment comparable to other bug bounty programs, and does it provide incentive for other white-hat hackers to spend time testing their systems for them?

I will add my opinion that I think the camera he received is almost worse than no payment. It is like Hikvision saying "we have taken the time to value your contribution, and we feel it is worth very little". Hikvision's cost on that $69 camera is surely even less than the retail value.

Another white-hat researcher reading this might say "It's not worth spending time evaluating Hikvision products/platforms because the company will not compensate me appropriately." This leaves those vulnerabilities open to black-hat attackers, who would NOT disclose them to Hikvision, and instead use them for their own financial gain in other ways, which would likely be a much worse scenario for Hikvision's customers.

Hackerone is a platform that helps coordinate and reward vulnerability discovery. According to them:

We recommend a minimum of $100. The average is around $500 and the current record is $30,000

Related, his reaction to Hikvision's cube camera was not positive:

"I will add my opinion that I think the camera he received is almost worse than no payment. It is like Hikvision saying "we have taken the time to value your contribution, and we feel it is worth very little". Hikvision's cost on that $69 camera is surely even less than the retail value."

You are being too nice...this is like leaving a penny as a tip for a waiter in a fine restaurant.

Only assholes do that kind of stuff.

Hikvision's cost on that $69 camera is surely even less than the retail value.

Not after you back out the subsidy ;)

Just a quick update on this, which I haven't put on my blog.

About 2 weeks ago I received an invoice from TNT. I have to pay them something in the region of 40 GBP for import taxes and admin fees. So yes, I actually lost money on this :-)

Iraklis, we paypal'ed you to cover the import taxes and admin fees. No reason you should have to pay to fix a vendor's problems.

Very nice gesture John. Appreciate it.

I have to pay them something in the region of 40 GBP for import taxes...

Ironically, many U.S. integrators would love a $50 import fee on every Hik camera brought in ;)

I think Hikvision's (flawed) perspective is that a researcher publicly disclosing vulnerabilities hurts their reputation more than it helps them improve their security. Therefore they won't promote it.

I think its the lack of a clear security strategy. They had the opportunity to offer me something in return for a NDA. I'm not taking a hit at Hikvision, unfortunately its a very common symptom that can be observed in many organisations.

Any speculation on what the cost to HIK would have been if the vulnerability had led to a high profile security breach?

If I was rating how companies respond to vulnerabilities their response would be as bad as it gets. They are actively discouraging anyone from taking a closer look - and this doesn't sound like it was a complex hack.

It doesn't surprise me that there are security flaws in security products - it does surprise me that companies don't realize that how they respond to a vulnerability is often MORE important than the vulnerability.

Any speculation on what the cost to HIK would have been if the vulnerability had led to a high profile security breach?

Hard to say, but between time spent internally dealing with the issue, potential lost business, etc., it would likely be a pallet-load worth of $69 cameras at a minimum.

...it would likely be a pallet-load worth of $69 cameras at a minimum.

Double pallet now thru Dec 31.

Any speculation on what the cost to HIK would have been if the vulnerability had led to a high profile security breach?

I would not speculate on the specific cost as it would minimally need to know how many accounts were stored there, what information about those accounts was there, etc.

But there is certainly a real cost in terms of reputation with this. Hikvision has spent a lot of money marketing their cybersecurity in response to the last round of issues. Time helps. It is a lot easier to say, "Yes we had problems but those were (approaching) 2 years ago." Now they need to go back out, defend this and answer more questions about their cybersecurity.

a $69 cloud camera...?? Either it is a slap in the face to offer such a low cost consumer camera, or a LOL that it is a cloud camera going to a network security researcher, or they are trying to silence/teach him a lesson. Once the camera phones home, they can try to PWN his network, as they already control the camera that is now inside his network...

Assuming he 1) actually uses it 2) places it at home and 3) isn't inside a giant honeypot....

One Hikvision cloud camera going on e-bay now.

You think Rapid7 limited response is that what they did was not checking the cloud service, but only perhaps Hikvision professional IPC?

Or does it seems Rapid7 is responsible seeing this issue found was and should of been detected by what should of been highly qualified engineers.

I guess no government likes to be found with egg on their face, or in this case with the pants on the floor.

Chinese companies don't like to pay anything for software, so finding something wrong all be it a serious issue, has even less value than a street vendor selling rat on a stick with suspicious sauce.

Or does it seems Rapid7 is responsible seeing this issue found was and should of been detected by what should of been highly qualified engineers.

It is an interesting question. It would certainly help if Hikvision made it clear what Rapid7 has tested, what they found and how frequently they test (do they test each new firmware release, etc., is it cameras only, etc.).

Albeit?

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/albeit

Eh, I hate to say it, but I can't imagine Dahua being much better about the situation unless someone twists their arm.

I think though...maybe I should ask them to create clear incentives and maintain a clear line of communication for vulnerability disclosures...

However, that would also assume they would be open about their existing vulnerabilities that they are working to address.

Life would just be so much better if more companies were clear and open about their software development roadmap. I can imagine if any surveillance manufacturer had their crap together like LibreOffice they'd be on top of our collective lists here in a heartbeat.

Or, implement something similar to the GDPR

Few things in life make C level execs more focused than potential multi-million EUR/USD fines.

Iraklis,

Thank you very much for your work on this and for your disclosure. It sounds like you gave Hikvision a fair amount of time to respond, and the fact that they did not, says a lot. Although we do not utilize Hikvision, this should be a wake up call for all other camera and IoT device manufacturers, that there are many White Hat hackers carrying out their own projects. Surely there are other camera manufacturers out there with this and other vulnerabilities, but when notified of a breach, we expect them to react swiftly.

I surely don't envy the work and due diligence necessary on the manufacturing side, but maybe we pay a few bucks more per camera to ensure we are dealing with viable manufacturers that protect us and themselves.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

NSA Director Keynoting Dahua and Hikvision Sponsored Cybersecurity Conference on Jun 13, 2019
The technical director for the NSA’s Cybersecurity Threat Operations Center will be keynoting a physical security cybersecurity conference that is...
Embattled $400 Million China Funded Philippines Surveillance System Proceeds on Jun 13, 2019
An embattled 12,000 camera surveillance system project that will cost ~$400 million will proceed.  The project contract was awarded, had its...
Dumber Techs, Bad Box Movers, Says Australian Distributor on Jun 10, 2019
Techs today are "dumber" than they used to be, despite better education and training and that makes a typical day "frustrating" for one...
Dahua Shipping To Mexican Manufacturer on Jun 07, 2019
Dahua has shipped ~300,000 pounds of parts to a Mexico manufacturing facility, IPVM has verified in shipping records. Inside this note, we...
Hanwha Dropping Huawei on Jun 06, 2019
Hanwha Techwin is dropping Huawei Hisilicon from all of their products, the company has confirmed to IPVM. Inside this note, we examine Hanwha's...
"New" Arecont Fixes Failures "Without A Fight" on Jun 05, 2019
The "old" Arecont was infamous not only for its camera failures but for making their "partners" fight to get them fixed. IPVM drew the ire of...
China / US Trade War Impact Splits Industry on Jun 04, 2019
As the trade war continues to heat up, 170+ integrators told us "What impact will the US / PRC China conflict have on the industry?" Respondents...
Vidsys New President Interviewed on May 31, 2019
A decade ago, PSIM was hot with projections then of a billion dollar market by now. This has not come close to happening. However, Vidsys, one of...
Alibaba Makes Major Investment Into Uniview on May 30, 2019
China's e-commerce and cloud services giant Alibaba has bought 15% of the shares of Uniview's parent company, TransInfo, in a deal worth ~$500...
Nortek Security CEO Out, Company Pivoting on May 28, 2019
Nortek Security's CEO, Michael O'Neal is out, after 8 years leading the company, in what Nortek described to IPVM as them having 'pivoted strongly...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Sighthound Transforms Into Enterprise AI Provider on Jun 14, 2019
Sighthound is now rapidly expanding its R&amp;D team, building an enterprise AI service. This may come as a surprise given their origins 6 years...
ADT Eliminating Acquired Brands, Unifying Under 'Commercial' Brand on Jun 14, 2019
ADT is eliminating the brands of the many integrators it has acquired over the past few years, including Red Hawk, Aronson Security Group (ASG),...
NSA Director Keynoting Dahua and Hikvision Sponsored Cybersecurity Conference on Jun 13, 2019
The technical director for the NSA’s Cybersecurity Threat Operations Center will be keynoting a physical security cybersecurity conference that is...
Farpointe Data Conekt Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jun 13, 2019
California based Farpointe Data has been a significant OEM supplier of conventional access readers for years to companies including DMP, RS2, DSX,...
Embattled $400 Million China Funded Philippines Surveillance System Proceeds on Jun 13, 2019
An embattled 12,000 camera surveillance system project that will cost ~$400 million will proceed.  The project contract was awarded, had its...
False Verkada 'Unrivaled' Low Light Performance Claim Removed on Jun 12, 2019
Verkada falsely claimed that it delivered 'UNRIVALED LOW LIGHT PERFORMANCE' until IPVM questioned. In fact, Verkada's low light performance is...
Manufacturer Favorability Guide 2019 on Jun 12, 2019
The 259 page PDF guide may be downloaded inside by all IPVM members. It includes our manufacturer favorability rankings and individual...
Camera Course Summer 2019 - Register Now on Jun 12, 2019
Register for the Summer 2019 Camera Course.  This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Favorite Wireless Manufacturers 2019 on Jun 12, 2019
Many wireless options exist for video surveillance but how are integrator's overall favorites? 170 integrators answered the question: What is...
Carnegie Mellon AI Startup Zensors Profile on Jun 11, 2019
Zensors is a startup formed by Carnegie Mellon graduates from a Carnegie Mellon research project, offering customized models per camera that they...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact