Previous **** ************* ***** ********* *** ****** *** ********
** ******, **** ************ ********* *** ****** **** *** licensing *.*** **** ******* *******(*** ****** *******)****** ****. **** ** ******* ******* H.265 ******* *** * ***** *** the **** **** ***** ************** **** ********, ****, *****, *****, Genetec, *********, *** **** ****** *** TVT ******** **** **** ****** *******.
Hanwha ******* ********; ********* ***** **********
***, ****** ** * ******** (*** ******** **** ******** ****), ***** ********* ******* **********. ********* has, *****, ******* ** ******* ** the ********* ***** ****** ******* **** IPVM **** *** *.*** ************ *********** use *** *******:
***** ****** ** ** ******** ****anyone ************ *** *.*** ******** *********** ********* *** ******* ** *** ****—now over 12,000. In light of the thorough independent evaluations that are required for these patents to be included in our pool, no reasonable person could claim otherwise. While we do not comment on the status of individual companies, we are diligently working on getting all H.265 implementers licensed. [emphasis added]
Hikvision ******** **** ** ******** ** ******* ** ********* ****
********* ** ******** **** ** ******** in ********* ****. ***** ** *** market-dependent**** ****** $.**-$* (*.*., ~$.** ** *****, $1 ** *** ** *** **) a ******, ************’* ***** ** ******* **+ ************** ********, ********* **** ***** ***** ** the $***+ ******* ***** *** ***** past * ***** ** ******* *.*** cameras ******* *** **** *******.
Issue ** ********
********* *** ***** ** *********** ****** advantages -******* ** *** *** ***** **********,********** ** **** ***, *** * ******* **** *************** ******* ******* ***********.
********* ** ** ******** *** *********** to ****** ******* ** ************* *** that **** **** *** **** ******* the *********. **** ** *** ******* unfair ********* **** ********* *** ******* its ******* ****** ****** *** **** domestic *********** **** *****, ******, *** TVT.
Comments (6)
Undisclosed Integrator #1
sorry for my lack of knowledge in this area.
would hikvision have to pay licensing fees on every camera that has the "ability" to do H.265? or only if the user is using the H.265?
Create New Topic
Undisclosed Manufacturer #3
Panasonic and ipro were also just added. Presumably that means they were selling without it as well.
Access Advance Announces Newest Additions to the HEVC Advance Patent Pool
NEWS PROVIDED BY
HEVC AdvanceDec 10, 2020, 23:00 ET
BOSTON, Dec. 10, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- Access Advance ("Advance"), an independent licensing administrator, today announced the addition of over 30 Licensees in recent months, including, ARRIS Solutions (a leading set-top box provider), DJI (a leading drone provider), Google (a leading internet-related services and products provider), Hanwha Techwin (a leading surveillance camera provider), OPPO (a leading global smart device brand), Panasonic (a leading multi-national electronics provider), and Panasonic i-PRO Sensing Solutions (a leading security/surveillance solutions and device provider).
Advance also recently welcomed Digital Insights, Google, and IBEX PT Holdings to the HEVC Advance Patent Pool as Licensors. The HEVC Advance Patent Pool now contains over 13,000 HEVC/H.265 essential patents, and of those patents, almost 11,000 are now available in a pool license exclusively through the HEVC Advance Patent Pool. For a complete up-to-date listing of all licensors and licensees in the HEVC Advance Patent Pool, please visit the Access Advance website.
Create New Topic