HD Analog Usage Rising But Barriers Growing

By: Brian Karas, Published on Jan 09, 2017

The good news for HD analog is that its usage is rising, fairly significantly since our 2015 HD analog usage statistics.

The bad news for HD analog is that integrators rejecting it is also rising, even more significantly compared to 2015.

The result is one of the most polarizing technologies in the industry. This report shares and analyzes those statistics, examining the key barriers and future challenges for HD analog.

*** **** **** *** HD ****** ** **** its ***** ** ******, fairly ************* ***** ******* ** ****** ***** statistics.

*** *** **** *** HD ****** ** **** integrators ********* ** ** also ******, **** **** significantly ******** ** ****.

*** ****** ** *** of *** **** ********** technologies ** *** ********. This ****** ****** *** analyzes ***** **********, ********* the *** ******** *** future ********** *** ** analog.

[***************]

HD ****** **********

********** ** *** ********** respondents **** ****** ******** knows ***** ** ****** and *** ***** * stance ** **:

*********** *** ***** ****** on ***** **.

2015 **********

********** *** / **** of ** ****** ********* from **% ** **%, a ****** *******. *******, rejection **** ******* ** integrators *** **** ****** unsure ** *** *** know ***** ** **** decided ******* **.

HD ****** *****

*********** ***** ** ****** reported ~**% ** *** cameras **** **** **** HD ****** ** ****. HD ****** ********** **** at ******** **** ** a *****, **** **** it **** ***********, ***** others **** ** * majority (**% ** ****) of *** ****.

*********** ********* ******* ** analog ***** ******** *** to ~**% ** ***** total ******* ***** ** analog.

****** **% ** *********** reported ***** ** ******, they ********* **** **** it ** ******** *********, making ** ****** * relatively ***** **** ** their ******* ********:

  • "**% ** ****** *** to *** **** ** IP *******, **** ******* and ***********. *** *** easy **** ** *******"
  • "** ****** ***** **%, IP ***** **%"
  • "**% ** ****** / 85% **"
  • "**:** ****** ** ***** have ***** ****** ** we ****** *** *** 1080p ******* ** ****** more ******* ********* ** Indonesia."
  • "*% ****. ** **** sold ****** *** ** as **** ***** *** larger ********** *** ********** clients"
  • "*-**%. ** * ***** dealer ** **** ***** predominantly. **** *** *** budget ******** ** ***** with ** ****** ****** do ** ******* ***."
  • "**%, **** *** *** to *** ************ ** end *****"
  • "** ****** **** ***** up ***** **% ** our ********. ** ***'* like ********* ** ***. We ************ *** ****** AHD ******. *** ** the *** ******** ** the **** ********* ** the ****** *******. **** just ***'* **** ** well ** * ******** VMS."
  • "**% - ****** *** small ******* *** ** very ***** ****** ** this *********"
  • "** ****** *%, ** 98% ****** ** **** it ** ****** ************"
  • "** ** *** **** analog **. ** *** using ******* *** *** PC *** *** ***** is ******* **** ****** with ********* *******. ***** is *** ******* **** in ******. ****** ** use ********* ******* *** smaller ***** *** ********* own ***."
  • "**%. ** ****** ** used *********** *** **** retrofits, *** ***** ****'* many ****."
  • "** **** ***** **% IP *** *% ***. We **** *** *** if * ****** *** existing *******. ** **** used ***** **** ******, we ********* *** ** IP *******. ** ****** like ***, * **** there **** **** ***** compliant ******** *** *** and *** ** ***** use ** **** ** there ****."
  • "** ****** **% / IP **% **** ********'* want ** **** ** full **. ** ****** is **** ** ********* where ** ** *** feasible ** ******* *** cable *** *** ******* would ***** ** *****."
  • "*% ** ******. ********* consider ** ** ***** of *** *** *** prefer ******* ** ******* over ** ******."
  • "*% ** ******; ****** to ** *********** **** retrofitting * ******** ****** system *** ***** **** mostly *** **********. *** more ******** *** ******** is *** **** **** understand *** ******** ***** an ** ********. **** the ********'* ** ****. is ******* ******** ***, we ********* **, *** they ********** *** ** advantage *** **** *** IP ***** ** ** under ***** *******."
  • "** **** **** *%. Although ** **** ** ( ** * *** cost *********) ** ***'* actually ***** ** ** customers; ** **** *** customer ***** ** ******* it ****** *** ********* reasons."
  • "*% ** ****** ** 95% **."
  • "%** ** *******. **** a *** ******** *** old *******."
  • "****** ** (**%). ** only *** ** ****** for **** ***** ********** and ********. *** **** customers *** ****** ** large ***** ********** *** government. **** ** ** still ***** **** *** the ****."

*********** ********* * ***** percentage ** ** ****** installs ********* ***** ** analog's *** **** ******* points: ****, *** ******* to ***** ***** (***** is ****** **** ******* form ** ****-******). **** group ******** ** ******* of **% ** *** cameras **** ********* **** HD ******:

  • "**% ** ** **% IP, *** ** *** fact ** ************ ******* and **** ** ** hardware."
  • "**/**. *** **** ****** we *** **** ** analog *** **** ******** by ***** **** ** use ******** *******. ****** was ********* **** *** image *******."
  • "***% ** ******. ********* in *********** ****** *** upgrading ******** ****** ******* at * ******* **** ie ***'* **** ** recable *** *** *** new ******* ** ****."
  • "**/** ******* **** ** HD *** ***** ** coax **** ********** *********** IP."
  • "******** **% **** ** analog. ** ** ***** easier **** ******* *** cable ** * ********. For **** *** ******** HD ****** *** ****** due ** ****. *** that *** ** *** and **********, ** ** easier ** **** ******* IP *** *** *** installations. *** *** ******** factor ** ***** ** analog ** ******** ****** is *** *** ********** available *** **** ********** keeps ********** *** ** cameras."
  • "**% ** ****** &**% IP ** *** * lot ** ******* ******** systems **** *** *** want ** ***** *** money *** *** *****"
  • "**% ** ****** ** 30% **. ******* ***** consideration & **** ********* resolution *** ** ******."
  • "**/**, ********* ******."
  • "**'* **% ** ** analog. ******* ** **** a *** ** ***** (low ***) *******. *** if ** ******* *******, it's **% ** **."
  • "**% ** *** ******* are ****** ****** ** HD ******. ********* *** still **** ***** *********. We *** ***** ** HD ****** ******* **** we *** ***** **. We *** ***** ****** the ********** *** ** with **************."
  • "* ***** *** ****** 60/40. ** ** ****** from * **** ******* stand *****. ** ***/***** installs ** *** ******** needs ** **** * little ***** ** **** look ** ***** ** over ****** *** ***** run *** ****/**** *** position **** *** * transition **** ** ** as ******."
  • "**-**. ******* ****** ** justify ** *******. ** real ********* *** **** customers. **** *********** *** in **** ** ****** and ***** *****"

Reasons *** ********* ** ******

* ******* ****** *********** gave *** ********* ** analog *** * ***** on ****** *********/*******, ***** HD ****** *** *** have ***** ********, ** had ******* *********** **** IP *******:

  • "***% **. ** **** mainly ** ***** *** environments, *** ******** *** design *********** **** ** towards **."
  • "***% ** ***.....** **** sell ** **** (** are **** ******* **********)."
  • "* **** *********** **** IP ****** *** +** cameras ******. * ******** analog ** ** ** good *** ***** *******."
  • "**% ** **. ** only **** ** *** scale ******** ** ** such ******** **** ****** decide ** ****** ** video ************, **** ****** IP."
  • "***% **. ** *** commercial ******** ********** * whole *** ************** *** just ***** ************ ** not ** ******."
  • "*%. ** ***'* *** HD ******. ** ** not **** ** ***'* believe ** ** * viable ****** *** **** people. *** *** ***** and ************* ***'* *** them. ** *** **** as * ******* *** cheaper *******."
  • "***% ** - ** HD ****** - ******* we ****'* *********, ******* or ********** ******** **** than *.* ** **********. 720P **'* *** ***** cellphones *** ****** ***** available ***, *** ****** wants ****?"
  • "*% *****'* **** * single ***. ** *****'* make ***** ** * professional *********** **** *** have ******* ******** ******* distributed ******* *** **********. For *** *** **** length ****** **** ** use *** ********."
  • "*%. ** ***'* **** the ******* ***** ********* projects **** ***** ********* toward ** ******. ********** clients *** **** ******-***** businesses *** ****** **."
  • "** *** ******** ** not ******* ** ** IP ** ***'* ***** our ****."
  • "***% **. ** ***'* believe ** ****** ** a **** ******** *** our *********."
  • "***% **. ** **** never **** ** ******. I ***** ******** ** in * ***** ** to ** ******* ***** the ******** ******* ****** could ** ****** *** would ****** ****** **-******* in **** ** *** more ****** ***** *** using *** ****** ** fraught **** **** ** you ***'* **** *** quality ** *** ****** and ***** ************. * would **** ******** ***** existing ******* ****** ** I ***** ***** **** are **** ********* *** the ******* *** ** big **** ********* *** cables **** *** ******* un-viable."
  • "*%. ** **** **** IP *********. ** *** a ******* **** ******** many ********* ******** **** are ****** ** *** network ** ** ***** only **** ***** **** the ******* ** **** also *** ******* *****."
  • "* ** ******. ** has * ******* ***** of ****** *******."
  • "*%, ******* **** *** HD ****** ** *** play **** ****** *** existing *******."
  • "*** ******* **. *** HD ****** ** ** unnecessary ****-** ****-****** ** native ** **** *** many ********* *********** ***********"
  • "*% ** ******, **% IP. ** **** *** company ****** ******, *** when **** ** *** the ******* ****** ** will ****** ****** *** quality *** ************* **** IP ******* *****."

Barriers ** ** ******

****** * ********** *** category *****, ** *** a ****** ** ******** barriers ** ** ******:

  • **** ** ***** ***** support - **** * of *** ~** ******* manufacturers (*********, *****, ******) even ***** ** ******. Because ** ****, **** integrators *** *** ***** brands (*.*., ****, ********, Sony, *********, ***., ***.) have ** *******.
  • ********* ****** **** *** brands *** ** - While ********* *** ***** are **** ***** *************, even **** ********* ******** HD ****** ** * lower *** / ****** choice ** **, ***** gets *** ***** ** sales *** *********.
  • ******* ******* ******* - Most ** ****** ******* are ***** ***, ******* offerings, **** * **** of **** ******* *** advanced ******** (**** ****** the ********** *****, ***** is ****** *** ** the *** ** *** range).
  • ******* ******* ******* - Even ** ***** ******* wanted ** *** ** analog, *** ******* ****** of ******* ******* ***** this **** *********.

Positive ****** ** ***

** *** **** ****, HD ****** *** ***** from ********* ******* ** 2012 ** * ******** that ****** **** ** integrators ***, ******* ***** barriers. ****** ** ***** alive.

Negative / ********** *** ******

** ****** ** ******* higher **********, ****** ************* and ****** ***** **** Coax. *** ** ***** things ****** **** **********.

*******, ****** **** ***** brands *** ** ****** products *** ****** *** current *** * ** analog ************* ********* ***** products **** ** ***** marketing, ** ****** ** likely ** ****** ** the ***** *** ** the ****** ** * major, *** ***********, ******.

Comments (19)

I am honestly a little surprised by these opinions.  Seeing the decent image quality and low price of HD analog cameras along with the ease of configuration when compared with IP alternatives I expected more acceptance.  I may be stuck in the past, but I just don't see a need for normal surveillance projects to require more than a 1080p image (if that).  Combine this with not having to worry about all of the headaches currently happening around the world with IP devices (botnets, shortage of IPv4 addresses, IP subnetting, etc) and I really expected HD analog to be a better alternative.  Do people think that it must be better because it costs more, is more difficult to set up/maintain and is able to be set to resolutions that would provide nothing more than eating up more disk space?

Do people think that it must be better because it costs more, is more difficult to set up/maintain...

The manufacturers spent a decade convincing everyone IP was better. This is an important factor.

To be clear, IP is definitely better in many ways but unless most of the (Western) manufacturers offer HD analog, the barriers are going to be hard to overcome.

What specifically do you feel is better about IP over HD analog?  I'm not trying to be contrary, just honestly interested in the opinions.

Higher resolution, PoE, structured cabling, on-board analytics, multi-imagers, panoramics, edge recording, lots more of options of where to buy from, various form factors, etc.

I am not saying that all of these are critical to the average application but there are definitely many benefits of IP. Related: HD Analog vs IP Guide 2017

I've always wondered why these features hit IP first and not Analog. I suppose an IP Camera is basically a little computer anyway, it already compresses & process the video before sending it to the NVR (opposite of analog).

I think the answer is that manufacturers LOVE to use the BARE minimum in analog DVRs. They'll never leave processing power unused. I imagine the processing of the information would have to happen on the DVR and have to happen on each channel that it's set up on, which would mean you'd have to actually make a decent DVR to handle that.

No one is putting Intel or AMD in a DVR, so until HiSilicon makes a processor that can do it I suppose we won't see it. I'd love to see it happen though.

Though this year will see the release of 4MP HD Analog cameras, so perhaps analog will have it soon?

"No one is putting Intel or AMD in a DVR, so until HiSilicon makes a processor that can do it I suppose we won't see it. I'd love to see it happen though."

HCVR8804/08/16S-S3

We actually sell that one...though we kinda have to admit it's basically an NVR with a 16 coaxial video inputs (and 16 coaxial audio inputs).

I dont think I've ever seen anyone nail it better in describing the differences in attributes between IP and HD analog in one sentence. Expectations, budget and flexibility affect the choice and one isn't better nor worse than the other.

I chose my good, reliable Honda Accord to go to the market but when I need raw power, capacity and features I've also got a solidly more expensive 4WD, 4 door pickup with a better suspension and far more horsepower than is required, usually anyway :-) 

That pretty much sums up the choices the end user client considering HD analog versus IP has to make ahead of time: what do I need to accomplish, what might I need to accomplish in the near future and how much can I spend. 

If distributors market this to customers the demand will increase without relevance of a solid security investment. I just see so much DIY box sale kits coupled with the eager trunk slammer startups. It's going to be a balance of quality control and cost design that aids the IPC based security systems. Would you buy a smart phone if it wasn't smart?

I might add this site is IPVM and as such you have a diverse, but adept group of IP video installers/users.

I might add this site is IPVM

That could be a factor, by definition what is not there is hard to tell. Certainly, HD analog is doing well in big box stores / online where price sensitivity is especially important.

Analogue is the better audio format, but for reasons of marketing we have digital content now. Beta was the better video format, but VHS won the war.
Why when we have rejected better formats in other areas in the name of "progress" are we returning to HD cameras? Are we all trying to "race to the bottom"?
It seems to also come down to the level of the installer; if they are focussed on selling to the trade end of town, then cheaper cabling & using electricians instead of installers drives the purchase towards HD.
If the purchasing officer is involved with the IT of the business, then they want the advantage, control & technology they understand in an IP based system.

Forgive me if someone else has already mentioned, but one of the pros of analog would be that the cameras are less vulnerable to exploits. I can see a comparison where IT folks would look at every IP Camera as a potential vulnerability, versus a solution utilizing HD-Analog, IT would only be worried about NVR's and Clients.

I think that is a good point, however organizations with that much awareness of security may also have needs that go beyond the capabilities of what many HD analog DVR's can provide (even with companion PC software).

IMO, a solid cost-effective multi-channel HD analog to IP encoder, to maximize VMS compatibility and ease of integration, could go a long way to make HD analog cameras more attractive than IP cameras in more cases. 

One of the main benefits I can see of HD anlog over IP is the ability to utilize the customer's existing coax infrastructure. The need (and cost) to re-cable for an IP system for a customer with multiple legacy analogue cameras, can have a significant negative impact on their final choice.

 Limited encoder options - Even if large systems wanted to use HD analog, the limited number of encoder options makes this more difficult.


Question for the group:

I'm not aware of any encoders for AHD, does anyone have any idea of who makes one and perhaps a decoder as well?

Why would you need an encoder ?  

For wireless applications.  Wireless is IP based, need a way to get this signal to work over an IP based system.

ok , understood !

Digital Watchdog makes an AHD encoder

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,367 reports, 855 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Dahua Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 01, 2019
Dahua favorability declined, in IPVM's 2019 integrator favorability series, driven by their backdoors, resulting in mass hacking and US government...
Uniview / UNV Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 12, 2019
Uniview / UNV, the self-proclaimed #3 China manufacturer, while starting late, has been working to make inroads internationally. In IPVM's 2019...
HID Product Configurator Examined on Nov 26, 2018
HID is widely used. However, figuring out all the different configurations of features for a final credential or reader part number can be a real...
Worst Access Control Manufacturers 2018 on Apr 18, 2018
Three access control providers stood out as providing the most problems for integrators. In this report, we analyze the answers to: "In the...
Worst NVR / VMS Manufacturers 2018 on Jan 29, 2018
These are the manufacturers who integrators reported the most significant problems with. 220+ integrators answered: In the past year, what...
Top Manufacturers Gaining and Losing 2017 on Nov 03, 2017
3 years ago, IPVM statistics accurately and early identified the rise of Hikvision usage across Western markets (see Top Manufacturers Gaining and...
Most Disrespected Manufacturer Competitors on Jun 01, 2017
Manufacturers told IPVM what competitor they most disrespected. There was one overwhelming selection that manufacturers felt was harming the...
Anixter Favorability Results on Mar 28, 2017
Anixter's direct sales and integrator anger about it has been in the news recently: Anixter / Bosch Sells Direct to Amazon Anixter Touts...
Arecont Favorability Results 2017 on Jan 25, 2017
Given Arecont is 3 time defending integrator choice for worst camera manufacturer, it should be little surprise they had the lowest score in the...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Verkada: "IPVM Should Never Be Your Source of News" on Jul 02, 2020
Verkada was unhappy with IPVM's recent coverage declaring that reading IPVM is 'not a good look' and that 'IPVM should never be your source of...
Vintra Presents FulcrumAI Face Recognition on Jul 02, 2020
Vintra presented its FulcrumAI face recognition and mask detection offering at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. Inside this report: A...
Uniview Wrist Temperature Reader Tested on Jul 02, 2020
Uniview is promoting measuring wrist temperatures whereas most others are just offering forehead or inner canthus measurements. But how well does...
Dahua USA Admits Thermal Solutions "Qualify As Medical Devices" on Jul 02, 2020
Dahua USA has issued a press release admitting a controversial point in the industry but an obvious one to the US FDA, that the thermal temperature...
Access Control Online Show - July 2020 - With 40+ Manufacturers - Register Now on Jul 01, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our July 2020 Access Control Show. With 40+ companies presenting across 4 days, this is a unique opportunity to hear...
Hanwha Face Mask Detection Tested on Jul 01, 2020
Face mask detection or, more specifically lack-of-face-mask detection, is an expanding offering in the midst of coronavirus. Hanwha in partnership...
UK Government Says Fever Cameras "Unsuitable" on Jul 01, 2020
The UK government's medical device regulator, MHRA, told IPVM that fever-seeking thermal cameras are "unsuitable for this purpose" and recommends...
Camera Course Summer 2020 on Jun 30, 2020
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training...
Worst Over But Integrators Still Dealing With Coronavirus Problems (June Statistics) on Jun 30, 2020
While numbers of integrators very impacted by Coronavirus continue to drop, most are still moderately dealing with the pandemic's problems, June...
FLIR Screen-EST Screening Software Tested on Jun 30, 2020
In our FLIR A Series Test, the cameras' biggest drawback was their lack of face detection, requiring manual adjustment when screening each...