HD Analog Usage Rising But Barriers Growing

By: Brian Karas, Published on Jan 09, 2017

The good news for HD analog is that its usage is rising, fairly significantly since our 2015 HD analog usage statistics.

The bad news for HD analog is that integrators rejecting it is also rising, even more significantly compared to 2015.

The result is one of the most polarizing technologies in the industry. This report shares and analyzes those statistics, examining the key barriers and future challenges for HD analog.

*** **** **** *** HD ****** ** **** its ***** ** ******, fairly ************* ***** ******* ** ****** ***** statistics.

*** *** **** *** HD ****** ** **** integrators ********* ** ** also ******, **** **** significantly ******** ** ****.

*** ****** ** *** of *** **** ********** technologies ** *** ********. This ****** ****** *** analyzes ***** **********, ********* the *** ******** *** future ********** *** ** analog.

[***************]

HD ****** **********

********** ** *** ********** respondents **** ****** ******** knows ***** ** ****** and *** ***** * stance ** **: 

*********** *** ***** ****** on ***** **.

2015 **********

********** *** / **** of ** ****** ********* from **% ** **%, a ****** *******. *******, rejection **** ******* ** *********** who **** ****** ****** or *** *** **** about ** **** ******* against **.

HD ****** *****

*********** ***** ** ****** reported ~**% ** *** cameras **** **** **** HD ****** ** ****. HD ****** ********** **** at ******** **** ** a *****, **** **** it **** ***********, ***** others **** ** * majority (**% ** ****) of *** ****.

*********** ********* ******* ** analog ***** ******** *** to ~**% ** ***** total ******* ***** ** analog.

****** **% ** *********** reported ***** ** ******, they ********* **** **** it ** ******** *********, making ** ****** * relatively ***** **** ** their ******* ********:

  • "**% ** ****** *** to *** **** ** IP *******, **** ******* and ***********. *** *** easy **** ** *******"
  • "** ****** ***** **%, IP ***** **%"
  • "**% ** ****** / 85% **"
  • "**:** ****** ** ***** have ***** ****** ** we ****** *** *** 1080p ******* ** ****** more ******* ********* ** Indonesia."
  • "*% ****. ** **** sold ****** *** ** as **** ***** *** larger ********** *** ********** clients"
  • "*-**%. ** * ***** dealer ** **** ***** predominantly. **** *** *** budget ******** ** ***** with ** ****** ****** do ** ******* ***."
  • "**%, **** *** *** to *** ************ ** end *****"
  • "** ****** **** ***** up ***** **% ** our ********. ** ***'* like ********* ** ***. We ************ *** ****** AHD ******. *** ** the *** ******** ** the **** ********* ** the ****** *******. **** just ***'* **** ** well ** * ******** VMS."
  • "**% - ****** *** small ******* *** ** very ***** ****** ** this *********"
  • "** ****** *%, ** 98% ****** ** **** it ** ****** ************"
  • "** ** *** **** analog **. ** *** using ******* *** *** PC *** *** ***** is ******* **** ****** with ********* *******. ***** is *** ******* **** in ******. ****** ** use ********* ******* *** smaller ***** *** ********* own ***."
  • "**%. ** ****** ** used *********** *** **** retrofits, *** ***** ****'* many ****."
  • "** **** ***** **% IP *** *% ***. We **** *** *** if * ****** *** existing *******. ** **** used ***** **** ******, we ********* *** ** IP *******. ** ****** like ***, * **** there **** **** ***** compliant ******** *** *** and *** ** ***** use ** **** ** there ****."
  • "** ****** **% / IP **% **** ********'* want ** **** ** full **. ** ****** is **** ** ********* where ** ** *** feasible ** ******* *** cable *** *** ******* would ***** ** *****."
  • "*% ** ******. ********* consider ** ** ***** of *** *** *** prefer ******* ** ******* over ** ******."
  • "*% ** ******; ****** to ** *********** **** retrofitting * ******** ****** system *** ***** **** mostly *** **********. *** more ******** *** ******** is *** **** **** understand *** ******** ***** an ** ********. **** the ********'* ** ****. is ******* ******** ***, we ********* **, *** they ********** *** ** advantage *** **** *** IP ***** ** ** under ***** *******."
  • "** **** **** *%. Although ** **** ** ( ** * *** cost *********) ** ***'* actually ***** ** ** customers; ** **** *** customer ***** ** ******* it ****** *** ********* reasons."
  • "*% ** ****** ** 95% **."
  • "%** ** *******. **** a *** ******** *** old *******."
  • "****** ** (**%). ** only *** ** ****** for **** ***** ********** and ********. *** **** customers *** ****** ** large ***** ********** *** government. **** ** ** still ***** **** *** the ****."

*********** ********* * ***** percentage ** ** ****** installs ********* ***** ** analog's *** **** ******* points: ****, *** ******* to ***** ***** (***** is ****** **** ******* form ** ****-******). **** ***** reported ** ******* ** 69% ** *** ******* they ********* **** ** analog:

  • "**% ** ** **% IP, *** ** *** fact ** ************ ******* and **** ** ** hardware."
  • "**/**. *** **** ****** we *** **** ** analog *** **** ******** by ***** **** ** use ******** *******. ****** was ********* **** *** image *******."
  • "***% ** ******. ********* in *********** ****** *** upgrading ******** ****** ******* at * ******* **** ie ***'* **** ** recable *** *** *** new ******* ** ****."
  • "**/** ******* **** ** HD *** ***** ** coax **** ********** *********** IP."
  • "******** **% **** ** analog. ** ** ***** easier **** ******* *** cable ** * ********. For **** *** ******** HD ****** *** ****** due ** ****. *** that *** ** *** and **********, ** ** easier ** **** ******* IP *** *** *** installations. *** *** ******** factor ** ***** ** analog ** ******** ****** is *** *** ********** available *** **** ********** keeps ********** *** ** cameras."
  • "**% ** ****** &**% IP ** *** * lot ** ******* ******** systems **** *** *** want ** ***** *** money *** *** *****" 
  • "**% ** ****** ** 30% **. ******* ***** consideration & **** ********* resolution *** ** ******."
  • "**/**, ********* ******."
  • "**'* **% ** ** analog. ******* ** **** a *** ** ***** (low ***) *******. *** if ** ******* *******, it's **% ** **."
  • "**% ** *** ******* are ****** ****** ** HD ******. ********* *** still **** ***** *********. We *** ***** ** HD ****** ******* **** we *** ***** **. We *** ***** ****** the ********** *** ** with **************."
  • "* ***** *** ****** 60/40. ** ** ****** from * **** ******* stand *****. ** ***/***** installs ** *** ******** needs ** **** * little ***** ** **** look ** ***** ** over ****** *** ***** run *** ****/**** *** position **** *** * transition **** ** ** as ******."
  • "**-**. ******* ****** ** justify ** *******. ** real ********* *** **** customers. **** *********** *** in **** ** ****** and ***** *****" 

Reasons *** ********* ** ******

* ******* ****** *********** gave *** ********* ** analog *** * ***** on ****** *********/*******, ***** HD ****** *** *** have ***** ********, ** had ******* *********** **** IP *******:

  • "***% **. ** **** mainly ** ***** *** environments, *** ******** *** design *********** **** ** towards **."
  • "***% ** ***.....** **** sell ** **** (** are **** ******* **********)."
  • "* **** *********** **** IP ****** *** +** cameras ******. * ******** analog ** ** ** good *** ***** *******."
  • "**% ** **. ** only **** ** *** scale ******** ** ** such ******** **** ****** decide ** ****** ** video ************, **** ****** IP."
  • "***% **. ** *** commercial ******** ********** * whole *** ************** *** just ***** ************ ** not ** ******."
  • "*%. ** ***'* *** HD ******. ** ** not **** ** ***'* believe ** ** * viable ****** *** **** people. *** *** ***** and ************* ***'* *** them. ** *** **** as * ******* *** cheaper *******."
  • "***% ** - ** HD ****** - ******* we ****'* *********, ******* or ********** ******** **** than *.* ** **********. 720P **'* *** ***** cellphones *** ****** ***** available ***, *** ****** wants ****?"
  • "*% *****'* **** * single ***. ** *****'* make ***** ** * professional *********** **** *** have ******* ******** ******* distributed ******* *** **********. For *** *** **** length ****** **** ** use *** ********."
  • "*%. ** ***'* **** the ******* ***** ********* projects **** ***** ********* toward ** ******. ********** clients *** **** ******-***** businesses *** ****** **."
  • "** *** ******** ** not ******* ** ** IP ** ***'* ***** our ****."
  • "***% **. ** ***'* believe ** ****** ** a **** ******** *** our *********."
  • "***% **. ** **** never **** ** ******. I ***** ******** ** in * ***** ** to ** ******* ***** the ******** ******* ****** could ** ****** *** would ****** ****** **-******* in **** ** *** more ****** ***** *** using *** ****** ** fraught **** **** ** you ***'* **** *** quality ** *** ****** and ***** ************. * would **** ******** ***** existing ******* ****** ** I ***** ***** **** are **** ********* *** the ******* *** ** big **** ********* *** cables **** *** ******* un-viable."
  • "*%. ** **** **** IP *********. ** *** a ******* **** ******** many ********* ******** **** are ****** ** *** network ** ** ***** only **** ***** **** the ******* ** **** also *** ******* *****."
  • "* ** ******. ** has * ******* ***** of ****** *******."
  • "*%, ******* **** *** HD ****** ** *** play **** ****** *** existing *******."
  • "*** ******* **. *** HD ****** ** ** unnecessary ****-** ****-****** ** native ** **** *** many ********* *********** ***********"
  • "*% ** ******, **% IP. ** **** *** company ****** ******, *** when **** ** *** the ******* ****** ** will ****** ****** *** quality *** ************* **** IP ******* *****." 

Barriers ** ** ******

****** * ********** *** category *****, ** *** a ****** ** ******** barriers ** ** ******:

  • **** ** ***** ***** support - **** * of *** ~** ******* manufacturers (*********, *****, ******) even ***** ** ******. Because ** ****, **** integrators *** *** ***** brands (*.*., ****, ********, Sony, *********, ***., ***.) have ** *******.
  • ********* ****** **** *** brands *** ** - While ********* *** ***** are **** ***** *************, even **** ********* ******** HD ****** ** * lower *** / ****** choice ** **, ***** gets *** ***** ** sales *** *********.
  • ******* ******* ******* - Most ** ****** ******* *** lower ***, ******* *********, with * **** ** form ******* *** ******** features (**** ****** *** resolution *****, ***** ** rising *** ** *** 3MP ** *** *****).
  • ******* ******* ******* - Even ** ***** ******* wanted ** *** ** analog, *** ******* ****** of ******* ******* ***** this **** *********.

Positive ****** ** ***

** *** **** ****, HD ****** *** ***** from ********* ******* ** 2012 ** * ******** that ****** **** ** integrators ***, ******* ***** barriers. ****** ** ***** alive.

Negative / ********** *** ******

** ****** ** ******* ****** resolution, ****** ************* *** likely ***** **** ****. All ** ***** ****** should **** **********.

*******, ****** **** ***** brands *** ** ****** products *** ****** *** current *** * ** analog ************* ********* ***** products **** ** ***** marketing, ** ****** ** likely ** ****** ** the ***** *** ** the ****** ** * major, *** ***********, ******.

 

Comments (19)

I am honestly a little surprised by these opinions.  Seeing the decent image quality and low price of HD analog cameras along with the ease of configuration when compared with IP alternatives I expected more acceptance.  I may be stuck in the past, but I just don't see a need for normal surveillance projects to require more than a 1080p image (if that).  Combine this with not having to worry about all of the headaches currently happening around the world with IP devices (botnets, shortage of IPv4 addresses, IP subnetting, etc) and I really expected HD analog to be a better alternative.  Do people think that it must be better because it costs more, is more difficult to set up/maintain and is able to be set to resolutions that would provide nothing more than eating up more disk space?

Do people think that it must be better because it costs more, is more difficult to set up/maintain...

The manufacturers spent a decade convincing everyone IP was better. This is an important factor.

To be clear, IP is definitely better in many ways but unless most of the (Western) manufacturers offer HD analog, the barriers are going to be hard to overcome.

What specifically do you feel is better about IP over HD analog?  I'm not trying to be contrary, just honestly interested in the opinions.

Higher resolution, PoE, structured cabling, on-board analytics, multi-imagers, panoramics, edge recording, lots more of options of where to buy from, various form factors, etc.

I am not saying that all of these are critical to the average application but there are definitely many benefits of IP. Related: HD Analog vs IP Guide 2017

I've always wondered why these features hit IP first and not Analog. I suppose an IP Camera is basically a little computer anyway, it already compresses & process the video before sending it to the NVR (opposite of analog).

I think the answer is that manufacturers LOVE to use the BARE minimum in analog DVRs. They'll never leave processing power unused. I imagine the processing of the information would have to happen on the DVR and have to happen on each channel that it's set up on, which would mean you'd have to actually make a decent DVR to handle that.

No one is putting Intel or AMD in a DVR, so until HiSilicon makes a processor that can do it I suppose we won't see it. I'd love to see it happen though.

Though this year will see the release of 4MP HD Analog cameras, so perhaps analog will have it soon?

"No one is putting Intel or AMD in a DVR, so until HiSilicon makes a processor that can do it I suppose we won't see it. I'd love to see it happen though."

HCVR8804/08/16S-S3

We actually sell that one...though we kinda have to admit it's basically an NVR with a 16 coaxial video inputs (and 16 coaxial audio inputs).

I dont think I've ever seen anyone nail it better in describing the differences in attributes between IP and HD analog in one sentence. Expectations, budget and flexibility affect the choice and one isn't better nor worse than the other.

I chose my good, reliable Honda Accord to go to the market but when I need raw power, capacity and features I've also got a solidly more expensive 4WD, 4 door pickup with a better suspension and far more horsepower than is required, usually anyway :-) 

That pretty much sums up the choices the end user client considering HD analog versus IP has to make ahead of time: what do I need to accomplish, what might I need to accomplish in the near future and how much can I spend. 

If distributors market this to customers the demand will increase without relevance of a solid security investment. I just see so much DIY box sale kits coupled with the eager trunk slammer startups. It's going to be a balance of quality control and cost design that aids the IPC based security systems. Would you buy a smart phone if it wasn't smart?

I might add this site is IPVM and as such you have a diverse, but adept group of IP video installers/users.

I might add this site is IPVM

That could be a factor, by definition what is not there is hard to tell. Certainly, HD analog is doing well in big box stores / online where price sensitivity is especially important.

Analogue is the better audio format, but for reasons of marketing we have digital content now. Beta was the better video format, but VHS won the war.
Why when we have rejected better formats in other areas in the name of "progress" are we returning to HD cameras? Are we all trying to "race to the bottom"?
It seems to also come down to the level of the installer; if they are focussed on selling to the trade end of town, then cheaper cabling & using electricians instead of installers drives the purchase towards HD.
If the purchasing officer is involved with the IT of the business, then they want the advantage, control & technology they understand in an IP based system.

Forgive me if someone else has already mentioned, but one of the pros of analog would be that the cameras are less vulnerable to exploits. I can see a comparison where IT folks would look at every IP Camera as a potential vulnerability, versus a solution utilizing HD-Analog, IT would only be worried about NVR's and Clients.

I think that is a good point, however organizations with that much awareness of security may also have needs that go beyond the capabilities of what many HD analog DVR's can provide (even with companion PC software).

IMO, a solid cost-effective multi-channel HD analog to IP encoder, to maximize VMS compatibility and ease of integration, could go a long way to make HD analog cameras more attractive than IP cameras in more cases. 

One of the main benefits I can see of HD anlog over IP is the ability to utilize the customer's existing coax infrastructure. The need (and cost) to re-cable for an IP system for a customer with multiple legacy analogue cameras, can have a significant negative impact on their final choice.

 Limited encoder options - Even if large systems wanted to use HD analog, the limited number of encoder options makes this more difficult.


Question for the group:

I'm not aware of any encoders for AHD, does anyone have any idea of who makes one and perhaps a decoder as well?

Why would you need an encoder ?  

For wireless applications.  Wireless is IP based, need a way to get this signal to work over an IP based system.

Digital Watchdog makes an AHD encoder

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Anyvision Facial Recognition Tested on Aug 21, 2019
Anyvision is aiming for $1 billion in revenue by 2022, backed by $74 million in funding. But does their performance live up to the hype they have...
Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Aug 13, 2019
Biometrics are commonly used in phones, but how frequently are they used for access? 150+ integrators told us how often they use biometrics,...
US Government Ban of Dahua, Hikvision, Huawei Takes Effect Now on Aug 13, 2019
The 'prohibition on use or procurement' of Dahua, Hikvision and Huawei products and 'essential components' take effect today, August 13, 2019, one...
Proactive CCTV "Only Affordable Video Archiving Solution" Profile on Aug 12, 2019
Proactive CCTV is claiming to offer "the only affordable video archiving solution on the market", reducing the storage typically required for H.265...
Milestone "GDPR-ready" Certification Claim Critiqued on Aug 12, 2019
Milestone is touting that its latest XProtect VMS is "GDPR-ready" with a 'European Privacy Seal'. However, our investigation raises significant...
Axis Door Station A8207-VE Tested on Aug 07, 2019
Axis newest door station, the A8207-VE, claims to deliver "video surveillance, two-way communication, and access control" in a single device. But...
Avigilon Blue VSaaS Tested on Aug 05, 2019
Avigilon says Blue is a "powerful integrator cloud service platform", easy to set up and configure, quickly scale business, by leveraging cloud...
Cisco Settles False Claims Act Suit For Video Surveillance Vulnerabilities on Aug 01, 2019
Cisco entered the video surveillance market in 2007 and suffered for many years through a variety of its own errors and arrogance. The conclusion...
Online Video Surveillance Sales Comparison - Amazon, B&H, CDW, LTS, Super Circuits, More on Jul 31, 2019
IPVM has uncovered the key trends and top options being offered across commonly used surveillance sellers. How has the market shifted since we...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...
ZK Teco Atlas Access Control Tested on Aug 20, 2019
Who needs access specialists? China-based ZKTeco claims its newest access panel 'makes it very easy for anyone to learn and install access control...
Uniview Beats Intel In Trademark Lawsuit on Aug 19, 2019
Uniview has won a long-running trademark lawsuit brought by Intel, with Beijing's highest court reversing an earlier Intel win, centered on...
Verkada People And Face Analytics Tested on Aug 16, 2019
This week, Verkada released "People Analytics", including face analytics that they describe is a "game-changing feature" that "pushes the...
Dahua OEM Directory 2019 on Aug 16, 2019
US Government banned Dahua OEMs for dozens of companies. The following directory includes 40+ of those companies with a graphic and links to...
Installation Course - Register Now on Aug 15, 2019
Register Now for the September 2019 Video Surveillance Install Course. This is a unique installation course in a market where little practical...
Axis Suffers Outage, Provides Postmortem on Aug 15, 2019
This week, Axis suffered an outage impacting their website and cloud services. Inside this note, we examined what happened, what was impacted...
Hikvision Scrutinized In The Netherlands on Aug 15, 2019
Hikvision is facing unprecedented scrutiny in the Netherlands, at the same time the US government ban has taken effect. This week, a Dutch...
Axis 4K Camera Shootout 2019 on Aug 14, 2019
Axis' 4K Q3518-LVE claims the "best video quality possible", with Lightfinder super low light performance, Axis' high end Forensic WDR, and...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact