HD Analog vs IP Guide 2019

Author: IPVM Team, Published on Dec 19, 2016

For years, HD resolution was IP camera's greatest advantage.

However, starting in 2013, analog cameras with HD resolution started shipping and, now, just a few years later, HD analog has become a significant force in the video surveillance industry.

In this report, we examine AHD, CVI and TVI, including their most recent 3rd generation advances, compared to IP cameras.

*** *****, ** ********** *** ** ******'* ******** *********.

*******, ******** ** ****, ****** ******* **** ** ********** ******* shipping ***, ***, **** * *** ***** *****, ** ****** has ****** * *********** ***** ** *** ***** ************ ********.

** **** ******, ** ******* ***, *** *** ***, ********* their **** ****** *** ********** ********, ******** ** ** *******.

[***************]

2019 *******: *** ********** **** ** ****

***** ************* **** ******** *** ************ ** ** ****** ********** since ****, **** ** ** ***** **** ***** ******** ****** rare, **** ******* ******* ************.

************, ***** **** **** *** ** ****** ************ **** **** slow ** **** ***:

  • ***** **** ****: ********* ***** ********* ***** **** **** (***** *** ***** running ** * ****** ****) ** ****, **** **** ******* shown ** ******** ***** *****. *******, ** ***** ****, *** product ******* ********, **** **** * ******* ** ******* ********** it ********* ** ***** *******. ***** ******* **** ******** **** availability, *** ** ** ***** ********.
  • ** ** ******: ************, ***** ** ********** *** **** ******** *** ******* years, ***** ****** **** **** ******** ****** ******* *********, **** 3MP/4MP *** **** ********* ********* *******.

**** **** ** **** ** **** **** *** *** ** TVI/CVI ** *** **** *** ****** *** **** ****** **** report ** ***********.

Multi-Technology ********* *** ******

** ****, **** *** ********** ** ****** **** ******* ***, CVI, *** *** ** **** ** ** ****** ** *** same *****, *********** ******** "*********" *********. **** ****** *** ******* flexibility ** ****** ********* *** ******* ****** ****-**.

** **** ** **** **** ******* ** ******** ** ****** tests, ** ****.

HD ****** ********

*** ** ****** ******* ******* ******* ***** ************, ********* ** 500m ** **-** ***** ***, ** ***** * *** ********** of *****, **** *** *********** ****** ******* ** ***, ***, 5MP, *** **.

Analog **** ********** (***)

****** **** ********** (***) *** ********* ******** **** ************ ********, ********** ********* **** * *** ********** ** ****, *** increased ** ***** ** *** ****** *******. *** **** **** known ****** ********** *** ***************** ******* ********, *******, **** *** ******* ** ***** **** offerings **** **** *********** ******. *** ** **** ***** *** having *** ****** **** ** ****** *******, ***** **** ****** at $** *** ****** ** ****, ****** ********* **** ******* with ** ***** *** ******* *******.

High ********** ********* ***** ********* (**-***)

**-*** (********* ***** *********)*** ********* ********** *** ********** ********* ** ****. *******, ** *** ***** been ******** ** ****** ********* *.* **************, **** **** ***-***** *** ******* ******** *********.

*** ***** ******* *** *** ******* ** ***** ******* *** Dahua *** ***** ********,*********, ****-***, ***** *** *** ******* ****** *** ******** ******, ** well ** * ******* ** ****** ***** ******.

** *****, ***** **** *** ***********, *** **** ******** ******* for *** *** ***, *** *************** ** *** ****. ****, ** ****, ************ ***** ******** **** ***** *.* *******, ******* ** ******* *** *** *** *** ** ***** HD ****** *********.

*** *** ******* *** *********.*** ***** ******** **** ********* ******* ***** ******* ** ***** ** *********** in **** *****, *** *****, *** *** ******.************, **** ***** *********** *** **** ********, **** ***** ******* up ** ~*,***' (~****) ******* ****** ** ** ******* ***********.*** **** ********** ** *********, ** ******* ******* ********** ** **** ** *** ** *** ********** (*********), *** full ***** **** ***** ** **** *** ** *******. *******, in **** ************ **** ** *** ****** ** *****, ** average ********** *** ********* ***** ** ***.

High ********** ********* ***** ********* (**-***)

**** ********************* ********* **-***(********* ***** *********), ***** *** **** ******* ** ******* *************, the ******* ** ***** ** *********, *****'* **** ****** **********. Others, **** ****&*,***,*****, *** ******* ************* **** ******* **, ** ****. ************, Hikvision *** ******** ****** ****** ****, *** **-*** ** ************ becoming ********* **** ****.

** ***'* ****** *.* *******, *** *** ***** ******** ******* for *** *** *** ******* ** **** ** *** *******. 5MP *** ** *** ******* ***** ******** ** ****/****.

********/************

*** ************ ** ******* *** ********** (*.*., *.*** ** *.***). The *** ********** ******* ***** ********* ** ***** *** *********** is ****.

** ** *******, *********** ** ********* ****** *** ******. ** others, *********** ** ********* ** *** ****** **** (*.*., ********, encoder, ***** ******, ***.).

**** ** * ***** ****** ** *********** ***********.

Advantages ** ******** ** *** ******

  • ********* ** *********** '*********'. ******* *** ***** ** ********** ** the ******, *** ****** *** ** ***, ***, ****, **** or **** *** *** ****** '***' ****** ******** ********** ************** (e.g., ***** ********).
  • ******** ******** *** ****** ** ***** ** *** **** ******** that ********** *** *****, *** ******** *****,***********************, ******* ******** *******, ******* ***** *********, ***.
  • ** *********** ******** ** ****** ** *** ********* ****. ***** the ***** ** ********** ********* ** *********-***** *.*** (** *.***), all *** *** / ****** / ******** ***** ** **** source ******** ** ****** / *******. ********** ** *** ****** is ****** ** *** ** ****** ************'* *** **, ************, ONVIF. ** ********, **** ******** ** *** ****** ****, *********** hardware ****** ***** ** ** ********, ***** ****** ********* ************* and ******** *******.

Disadvantages ** ******** ** *** ******

**** ********* ***** ***** ****** ***** ** **** *** ********** power / ******** ** ****** ******* ** **** ****** ** to * ****** ** * *** ********* / ******** ***** then ****** ******** *** ******** *******. **** ** *** ****** why ** ****** ******* *** ********* ******* **** ********* **** IP *******.

***** **** **** ******** ** ****, ***** ***** ** ****** is * ********, ********** ** ******. **** *** ******** ** cameras ***** * ******** **** *** ********* ** ********* - increased **********, ********* *** ******** *****************, **** *** ***********, ***. These ****** *** ****** *** ******* ** ****** (** ** SD) *******.

**********

************, **** ** ****** *** ** ******* ********* ********* **** HD ***** **********. **** *** * *** **** **** ** analog's ******** ********** ** *** / ~*.* **. *******, ** / *.*** ** ******* *** *** ***********.

** ****, "**" ***/*** ******* *** *** *********, ****** ***** rate ** ******* ** ** ** *** **** ******** ** cases, ** ** *** "****" **, ***** ******** ** *** as *** *********.

*** ***, ** *** * **** ** ********** ** **** frame ****, ****** ************ **** *** ***** ************ **** ****** need * ****** ****** **** **** **** **********. ********** *** indoor ***** *** ***** / ******* ********, ***** ** ** often ******.

Advanced ********

** *** * ***** **** ** ******** ********, ***** **** IP ******* *** ********* ********* **** ******* ******** *** *** therefore ******* *** ***** ** ******** ********** (*****,******* *********, ******* ******** *******, ** ***** ***** *********, ***.).

*** *** *** ***** **** ******** ** ** **** ** I/O *** ***-*** *****, ** **** ** *** ******* *** configuration ** *** ****. *** **** ****** ***/*** ******* ** the ****.

Recorder *************

** ******* *** ** **** ********** **** *** ******** ** client ** ****** ********, ******* ** ** *********** *********** ** the *** ** "*********" *********.

** ****** ****** ***** ******* *********** ******** / ******** ******** which ****** ****** ** ***** ** ***** ****** ****. *** recorders (** ********) **** ** ********* ***** **** *******. ************, AHD, ***, *** *** ********* *** **** ** *** *** match ****** ** **** / *** ****** **** ***** *** HD ****** ****.

** ****** ***** **** ************ *** **** ********** **** **** other. *** *******, ** *** ********* * *** ****** ** an *** ** *** **** ********, *** **** *** ** usable ***** (********, **** *** ***** *** ******). ** *********** this *****:

*******, ** ****** ************* *** ********* ************* ** ** ****, with ******** ************* *** ******** "*********" **** ***** ******* ***, CVI, *** *** (**** *******'* "*****-****" *********). *** ***** ****** ****** ** ****** ** **********, ***** rate, *** ******** ******* ******* ** **** ******** **** ***** these *********, ** * ************ *** ******* ***** ********* ******** at **** **********/***** ****, *** ****** ****** ********** ******* ** others ** ********* ** *** **** ******* *** ***** ********.

Coax *************

** ******* *************** **** **** (***) ********** *** **** ****** ****. ***** ********* *** $*** ** $400 *** ******.

*** ***** ****** ***** *** ******** ** *** **** ****** installed ******* *****, ****** *** ******** *********** ******* ****. *** and *** **** ***** "**** *,***'" ***** **-** (*** **** our ***** ********** **** ** ** ****'). ** *** *****, early *** ******** *** **** ****** ***** **** ***** ****, but ***** **** ***** **** ******** ****-*** *.* **** ********.

***** **** ****

*** ** *** *** ************ ******** ** ** ******* *** been ***** **** ******** (***). ******* ** ***** *** ***** for ***** *** ******* *** *****, * ****** ***** *** be **** *** ***** ************ *** ** **********. **** ***** over ****, ******* ***** *** ** ******** **** **** *****, external ***** ******** *** ** ******* *** **** ***** **** can ** *******.** ************ ********* *** *** ******** ** ~$** *** ****** (***** on * ** ******, ****' **** ** ***** ***, '***** over ****' **** ****** ****** ***** ~$***).

** ** ****, ********* *** ******** **** ****** ** ***** over **** (***) ******* *** ****, **** ****** ******** **** common. ***** *** *** ********** *** *** ******.

Vendor *******

** *** ******* ****** *******, **** ** ***** ** ****** of ************* *** ***** ** **** ******* *********.

** ****** ******** **** ******* *******, ****** ******* ** *** relatively ***** ************.

  • *** *** ************ *** *** ***** ****** *******, **** **** low **** ** ** **** ****** ********* **. *******, ************* such ** ******* *** ******* ******** ***** *** *******, ** well.
  • *** *** ***** ******* ******* ***** (*** ******* ** ***) and ***** **** (** ***** *******, **** ********************-***).
  • *** ** ********* ** * ****** ** *********, *** ** far *** ******* ** ********* (*** ***** ****).

Western / ******** *** ****** *** ********** ** ******

**** ** *** ******* ****** ** *** ***** *** *** supporting ** ******. *** *******, ********, ****, *****, *****, *********, Pelco, **** *** *** *** ********** ** ******. ******* ***** support, **** ****** ********* ******* ****** ** ****** ***, *******, validation ** *** ********** ** **** **** ** ***** ****** manufacturers *** **** ***** **** ********** ** ***.

** ********, ** ****** *** **** *** ** ******* *** Korean *************, *** *** ********* ** *** *** ** *** tiers ** *** ****** *** ** *** ***** ** **** recognition **** ******* ****** ** *** ******* *** ******** ******.

Model ************

** ****** ******* ********** ******** ******** **** ** **** *****-******** WDR, ***** *** *****, ***., *** **** ****** **** ** cameras **** ***** ********. ***** ********** ***** *** ********* ** analog ******** ************ ******* ******** ********, *** ***** *** ***** less ********** **** ** *******.

** *** ***** ****, **** ******* ******** *** ***** **** factors *** ***** *** **** ****** ********* ** ** **** HD ****** ****** ** **** ******* **** ** ** ****** as ********* ******* ** *** ****** ****** ***** ***** **** and **** ************* ******* *** ********.

Cost **********

** ****** *** *********** **** ********** **** **, **** ** the ****** *** ******** ****. **-**% ***** **** *** ** analog ** ********** ****'* ** ******* ** ***********.

** ****** ***** *** *** ********** ****, ******* **** ******* high ****** ** *** ***** *** ****** ** ***** **** Asian ****** ********* ** *** **** *** *****. ** ****, a '*****' ** ****** **** * **** ***** ****** ****** a ***** *********** **** ** *** $** - $*** *****.

***, ***, *** *** ******* *** ********* *** ********* ***********, even ******** ** ******* ***** ***** ** *******, ********** ******** ** ~$** ****** ***** ******* *** ***************** ***** $***.

Install **********

********** ******* ** ********* ** **** ********* **** ** **** any ** *** *** ****** ********. **** **, **** ****** needs ** ** *******, *** ******* ***** ** ** *** up ********, *** **** ***** ** **** ** ** ******* the *******, *** *** ***/******** **** ******* ****, ****** *** direct ****** ** *****.

*********** ** ************ ************* **** *** **** **** * ***** problem. *******, **** *** ** *** *********** *** ******* ***** will **** ** ******'* "**** *** ****" ************ **** ******.

HD ****** ******* *** *** ** **, ***** ***** *** ******

************ ************, ****** ******** *********** *** ********* ******** (****** **********, better *************) *** ******* ***** ** ****** ********.

** *** ***** ****, ** ****** ** ***** ****** ******* / ******** ** *** *** *** ** *** ******. *** lack ** ****** ******* *** *** ******* ** *** ******* Western *** ******** ****** ** ******* ** ****** *** **** it ****.

*******, ***** **** ****** ********** ********** *** ** ******* *** higher *** ************ ************, ** **** *******, **-***** *********, *****-******* with * ****** ******, ***. **** ******** ** ** ** only. ************, **** ****** ************ **** ************ ** *** *******. While ** ****** ******* *** ** **** **** ***** ******, IP ******* ****** * **** ******* / ****** *** *** such ******* *************.

[****: **** ***** *** ***** ******* ** **** *** ******* in **** *** **** ** ******* ************ ** ******** ******** and ****** ***********]

Comments (24)

So is "HD" the new "SD"? It seems like 1080p/2MP is the new minimum standard to replace D1/4CIF. Maybe the IP centric players like Axis need to push anything above 2MP as the offering of choice, dropping any HD labels. They could consider HD as old tech. This might give them a little bit of life over the analog HD products, if for just marketing purposes.

"So is "HD" the new "SD"?"

Yes, HD analog is killing SD analog very quickly this year. We reviewed the numbers behind this here - The Company Behind AHD - Nextchip. While there will certainly be some who use NTSC / PAL for years to come, this will mostly come from maintaining legacy systems, not for any sizeable number of new deployments.

As for the IP centric players, they could push 3MP as the new minimum. Indeed, Omnivision has new 4MP sensors that are empowering a new generation of IP cameras, unfortunately for Axis et al, Dahua and Hikvision have taken the lead there (we have bought those 4MP cameras and Ethan is testing that currently).

Worse, the HD analog folks are talking about doing higher than 1080p next year, so if that comes to pass, the resolution advantage will be further deteriorated.

I know that SD is dead, but what I meant was more from a marketing aspect, the IP only guys /could/ treat HD as dead/old/ancient if they chose to. But since analog HD isn't going to be confined to 2MP, it may be too late for them to beat that drum.

The only time I feel compelled to offer IP on smaller projects these days is when a client /really/ needs ease of playback and HDCVI still is lacking here. If Dahua could just improve their interface/playback/backup to be as simple as a good VMS (i.e. Spectrum), I wouldn't need to leave the HDCVI world very often.

Well Spectrum, i.e., DW is just starting to release their own HD analog (AHD) offering, so there is that as well to consider.

Jon, I agree. I see a lot of manufactures still using the HD logo on their 720p cameras (even in 2016). Wow... Big deal... We need to stop using the HD logo to hide 720 making people think it is 1080. And don't get me started with calling a 1280x1024 camera 720p... You are dumbing down the image for 16:9, usually for no reason...

I do see 1080p as being the minimum resolution that most big manufacturers are putting out for IP or HD analog products.


I personally thing that 4Mp will be the "new" 1080, and then 5Mp > 4k > 12mp being the new premium standards...

720p should be called HD ready like 720p TVs. They will be dead soon I hope, like noone buys 720p TVs any more, only FullHD.

HD Ready doesn't mean 720p. It meant the TV was HD capable, but no HDTV Tuner was built in.

Ethan,

Thanks for posting this. It's very useful. One point: On the 960h just being a stretched out D1 picture, that is only true if one is using a D1 camera on a 960h recorder. If you use a camera that puts out a real 960h signal on a 960h recorder it is not stretched at all. Conversely, if you put a 960h camera on a D1 recorder the picture is squeezed and subjects look like the cowboys riding off into the sunset during the credits of an old western movie (tall and thin). With the HD analog formats this may not seem inportant but we have found that we have gotten a much improved picture with the 960h format when replacing old analog cameras and recorders. Plus legacy equipment such as a matrix and distribution amplifiers will pass the 960h signal perfectly. If the analog HD formats would pass through a matrix (they don't) I would be using them already.

If you use a camera that puts out a real 960h signal on a 960h recorder it is not stretched at all.

Believe it or not, at least in the early days of 960h some manufacturers actually screwed this up, and the picture would be stretched even when using 960h with 960h. Because of this sloppiness by a few, 960h has gotten a reputation as a scam and pure marketing.

When, IMHO, it's not. It's actually a quite clever way to get more resolution out of a limited NTSC signal.

It's often thought that 720x480 is a limitation imposed by NTSC on the upper bounds of resolution*. This is only half true, since only the 480 vertical limit is set in stone, originally indicating the number of electron gun sweeps necessary to render on a CRT. But the horizontal is bounded only by what ever you can modulate. In broadcasting no one actually ever did more because of the limitation of the color mask in CRT's, which physically restricted the resolution to accommodate color displays.

The absence of this mask is why some high end B+W CRT monitors can boast 1000tvl on 'real' NTSC.

Anyway, since there was unused available bandwidth in NTSC, but only in the horizontal analog signal, Sony created a sensor which took advantage of this by creating a sensor with 960 horizontal pixels but only half that many vertically, 480. Most importantly, they used the same 1/3" 4:3 sensor dimensions as the 720x480 sensors, in effect creating non-square pixels. Ones that are tall rectangles. This is easily verified by checking out a given camera sensors resolution vs it's physical chip size.

All this cleverness though has a risk that when displaying the raw pixels one must either 1) display them on a monitor with non-square pixels (no one does this), or 2) interpolate the pixels back to a squarer aspect ratio.

Failure to do this results in a stretched picture, as all the 960 horizontal pixels are displayed as if they represent the same amount of width per pixel as the vertical ones represent length.

It's all (almost) water under the bridge, but I think this was a neat trick in Sony's part, and should be remembered for what it was.

*720x480 is actually part of the agreed upon standard of how to digitize a D1 picture, namely ITU-R BT.601.

How does 960h give you a much nicer image? It may give you a little more width in your scene, but it doesn't add usable resolution over D1/4CIF?

On a purely quantitative basis, a 960h sensor typically has > 100,000 pixels more than a D1 sensor.

Correctly rendered it isn't any "wider", since the sensor is the same physical width in both cases.

Are you referring specifically to DW's implementation?

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but isn't 960h just a widescreen version of D1? 16:9 vs 4:3?

No. They are (AFAIK) both using 4:3 1/3" sensors. The FOV is therefore the same.

The thing is that 960H crams in 240 more pixels in the horizontal direction than D1, but having the same number in the vertical, 480.

The way they do this is by making the pixels themselves narrower, so they are elongated rectangles instead of squares.

If you then show such an image dot-for-dot on a monitor, it will appear wide. If instead you correct for the pixel aspect ratio by re sampling you get a final image of ~960x800, which has all the added horizontal resolution, but really only 480 scaled to 800 in the vertical.

This re sampling is what the 960H Dvr needs to do. But even in the wide "stretched" renderings of the image, the added resolution is still there.

Each pixel in the image represents one pixel from the sensor.

Check please 3 things:

1. AHD now support also PTZ and camera settings (OSD) over coax

2. Never met TVI cameras with support two way audio

3. AHD works well through UTP cable without baluns - checked with 5E cable, cross section 0.46 mm2, 200m length, 720p cameras, picture is suitable, almost without quality losing

I've added a point about AHD supporting up the coax control, thanks.

As far as TVI cameras with audio, I'll agree with you. I've never seen a camera that includes it, either, but it is technically supported by TVI. My guess is that audio is not a heavily requested feature in the segments TVI cameras are typically made for.

3. Curious, what do you mean "works well through UTP cable without baluns"? How are you connecting to the UTP cable without a balun? Does the camera have UTP output?

We have not tested any current generation AHD yet, so I can't comment on quality. I believe we may test Samsung's commercial AHD line when it arrives, but not sure on timeline.

How do you know that TVI technically supports audio over coax? Last CPSE 2015 we asked Hikvision engineers to prove it this point, but they failed. May be there is lack of technical datasheets and detailed specifications of any HD analog format, but it seems that some features exist only in advertisement materials.

Also, Nextchip engineer told about huge video quality losses and interference when they tested audio over coax in AHD. Transmission distance of suitable signal was dramatically decreased. It was over of the reasons why they declined this function.

3. To test audio through UTP we used usual BNC connectors with BNC male and screw terminal. It looks strange, but it works. This feature is also built-in technical opportunities of all HD analog formats.

CVI certainly has audio, like this model.

TVI may not have copied that part of the spec from Daniel/Dahua, but now with the reconvergance of HD 3.0, I would expect they will.

Related: The Real Inventor Of HD-CVI And HD-TVI?

AHD works well thru UTP cable without baluns - checked with 5E cable, cross section 0.46 mm2, 200m length, 720p cameras, picture is suitable, almost without quality losing.

Have you done a side by side of with and without baluns?

I would imagine that the signal would degrade noticeably by 200m. Even with baluns it is worse (slightly) than coax.

Category cable has a characteristic impeadance of 100 Ohm, RG-6 coax is 75 Ohm. That means a lot of reflections (ghosting) and attenuation thru cancellation.

Did you use one single pair, one split pair, or multiple pairs?

I know about impedance difference, and I know that we didn't use terminating resistors and other ways to match resistance up to 75Ohm

But I can share images of original signal and long distance one .

We tested all types: if use single pair, maximum transmitting distance is 100m. Is twisted pairs - 200m is suitable, but has noticeable losses. For multiple pairs (2x2) result was really fine for 200m for 1080p camera. For 720p and multiple pairs result also was suitable for usage.

Very informative with power over coax.

While you get longer transmission distances using coax, isn't coax cable much stiffer, thicker, more expensive, and more difficult to install?

It most often is; however consider the 'per unit length' cost of longer than 100 M, more expensive RG-59 is still less than a 'fully commissioned' cost of a UTP run to the same length, given UTP requires active 'hops' in the form of additional devices like switches, midspans, extenders, etc.

In some cases, existing coax cabling can be reused 'in-situ' for HD analog, while IP would require converters to use it, or likely just a whole new run of UTP instead.

Beautiful information about Analog Camera.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
WDR Tutorial on Jan 11, 2019
Understanding wide dynamic range (WDR) is critical to capturing high quality images in demanding conditions. However, with no real standards, any...
Bad: Dahua Villa Video Doorbell Tested on Jan 11, 2019
Doorbells are one of the hottest segments in the residential market but Dahua's Villa Video Doorbell is the worst we have tested.   We bought and...
Last Chance - Winter 2019 IP Networking Course on Jan 10, 2019
Today is the last day to register for the Winter 2019 IP Networking course. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video...
CES 2019 Show Report on Jan 10, 2019
IPVM was at CES 2019 for the second year (see our CES 2018 Show Final Report) and is reporting on announcements and interesting news from the show...
NTP / Network Time Guide For Video Surveillance on Jan 10, 2019
Inaccurate time can lead to missing or inadmissible video, yet this topic is often overlooked, with cameras and servers left defaulted,...
Worst Products Tested In Past Year on Jan 09, 2019
IPVM has done over 100 tests in the past year. But which products performed the worst? Which ones should users be most aware of? In this report,...
Managed Video Services UL 827B Examined on Jan 09, 2019
Historically, UL listings for central stations have been important, with UL 827 having widespread support. However, few central stations have...
UK: Private Video Surveillance Complaints Down Since GDPR on Jan 09, 2019
The arrival of the GDPR on May 25, 2018, brought fears the law would spark a massive increase in privacy complaints about security camera use....
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial on Jan 08, 2019
H.265 support improved significantly in 2018, with H.265 camera/VMS compatibility increased compared to only a year ago, and most manufacturers...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...
2019 IP Networking Book Released on Jan 14, 2019
The new IP Networking Book 2019 is a 285 page in-depth guide that teaches you how IT and telecom technologies impact modern security...
Arecont Costar Layoffs on Jan 14, 2019
Arecont Vision, a Costar Company, has laid off more than 10% of their workforce in a move the company described to IPVM as a result of "important...
The False SCMP Story on Hikvision NYC AI on Jan 14, 2019
In the past week, one of Asia's largest publications, the South China Morning Post (SCMP), posted an article about "Chinese [facial recognition]...
WDR Tutorial on Jan 11, 2019
Understanding wide dynamic range (WDR) is critical to capturing high quality images in demanding conditions. However, with no real standards, any...
Pelco Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 11, 2019
Pelco had a significant favorability problem amongst integrators in our previous study (see 2016 Pelco results). Now, in the first edition of our...
Bad: Dahua Villa Video Doorbell Tested on Jan 11, 2019
Doorbells are one of the hottest segments in the residential market but Dahua's Villa Video Doorbell is the worst we have tested.   We bought and...
Last Chance - Winter 2019 IP Networking Course on Jan 10, 2019
Today is the last day to register for the Winter 2019 IP Networking course. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact