Hanwha Techwin Favorability Results Hurt By Samsung Loss 2016

Author: John Honovich, Published on Dec 19, 2016

The video surveillance manufacturer formerly known as Samsung; 100+ integrators told IPVM how they felt about Hanwha Techwin.

The key themes:

  • Hard hit by Samsung brand loss
  • Price / quality ratio most positive element

Inside, we share over 50 integrator comments plus analyze the overall statistics for Hanwha Techwin:

*** ***** ************ ************ ******** ***** ** *******; ***+ *********** told **** *** **** **** ***** ****** *******.

*** *** ******:

  • **** *** ** ******* ***** ****
  • ***** / ******* ***** **** ******** *******

******, ** ***** **** ** ********** ******** **** ******* *** overall ********** *** ****** *******:

[***************]

Statistics ********

****** *** **** **** ******* ******* *** ** ******* *** neutral ********:

******** ** ***** ********** ***** ********* (*****, *********, ****), ****** did ****** *** ** ********* **** ** ****** *** ******* brand, ** *** ********** ********** **** ***** **********.

Samsung ****

*** **** ****** ***** *** *** *** **** ** ******* hurt ******:

  • "**** ***** **** ***** ** *** *** ******* ****."
  • "***** **** ****** **** **** **** *******. *** * **** recognized ****."
  • "* ***** ** * ******, ****** **** ** *** *******"
  • "**** ******* *** * ********** *****. *** ******** *** ******* move **** ** ******** *** ******* ****."
  • "*****'* **** ****. *** **** ****** ** *** ***** **** changed *** ****. *** ** **** ** ****."
  • "****** *** ******* ***** *** **** ****. ***** ****** *******, but **'* ********** ****** ** **** ******* *** **** ***********."
  • "**** **** **** ******* **** **** *** *** ****."
  • "******* *** *** **** ********* **********, ** *** *** **** to ******** ********* **** **** **** *** ** ********** ** the ** ******** *****."
  • "********* ***** ** ******* **** *** ******* ******* ***** ** wary."
  • "******* -> ******* -> ******... ******** ******* *** ******* ****. Who ***** **** ********?"
  • "** **** **** **** ** *** ******* **********, *** ** was **** ** **** *** ******* ****. *** *** ****** and ********* **** ******* *** *** *** ****** *** *** future **** *** *** * *** ** ********* ***** *** them."
  • "*** ***** ******* ****** ******* ***** ******** ** *** ***** frankly ****** ** ***."
  • "***? ******* **** **** **** ******* *********** ***** *** ******* and ******** *** **********."
  • "********* ****-*** ******* ***** *******. *** *** *****, ****** ***** relative *******. **** **** ** ******* ********** ***** **** **** years."
  • "*** **** ** ****** ******* *** * ****-**** ***********."
  • "**** ***** ******** ***** **** ******* ******* **."

**** *********** **** ******* ****** ************ ****** *** *******:

  • "***** ***** ** **** *** ***** **** ****. ****** **** a ******* *****, ***** ** ***** ******* ********."
  • "******* ****."
  • "** ****. *** *** **** ** *** ******* ***** ** not ** ***** ****."
  • "*****"
  • "**** *** *** ******* ********* ** ******** *** ** ******** security ******."

****** ******* *** *** **** ********* **** ***********, * ***-****** number ** *********** **** *** ** **** *** ****** ***:

  • "* ***'* **** ***** ********."
  • "***** ***** ***** ****."
  • "***'* **** *** *******."
  • "***** ***** ** **."
  • "***'* **** **** ***** ****."
  • "***'* **** ***** ****."
  • "*** ******** **** ****."

Price / *******

** *** ******** ****, * *********** ****** ** *********** ******* Hanwha's ***** / *******:

  • "*****/******* ***** ***** ****, *** * **** ***** ** *******. Many ******** *** **** ******."
  • "*** **** *******, **** **** **** *******, ***** ******* **** quality."
  • "**** ***** *** *** *****, ********* ** ***** ******."
  • "**** ******* *** ********* ***** ***********. ***** *** * *** higher **** *** ****** *******."
  • "** **** **** ******* / ******* ******* **** ** * secondary **** ** *** **** **** ******** *** * *** years. **'* ***** ** ********* ***** **** ** ***** **** is *** *********."
  • "**** ***** ******* ****."
  • "*****'* * *** ** **** ***** ******. ****'** ********** **** everything, ****** *************, **** **** *** ********, **** **** **** us ** *** ********. **** *** **** * ****** ********** - **** ******** ** ************* - *** ****** ***** **** overall ***** *** **."
  • "**** **** **** *** * **** ***** *****. **** * nicely ******* ******* ****. *** ** *** ****** ******* **** products."
  • "****** ******* ***** ******* ******* **** ** *** ***** *** the ******* ***** *** ** *********."
  • "**** ***** *'** **** ** *** ********...********** *** *** ***** point."
  • "**** ******* *** * ********** *****."
  • "**** ******* ************* ******. ** ** *** **** *** *** 1/3 ** *** ***** ** ** ****** ***** ** *** Chinese *** **** ******** *** ******* *** ***** ** ****** Chinese."

******, ******'* ******* ** *** ** *** ******* ** ******* products. ***** ** *** ******* **** ***, *** *********** ** premium ***** *** *** ****** **** *** * ****** ***********.

*******, * ****** ** *********** *** ******'* ******** ** **** stuck ** *** ****** **** * ****** ***** / ******* combination:

  • "*** ************ ********, *** *** **** *****, *** *** **** technology."
  • "**** ******* ************, ******* ** *** ****."
  • "**** ******* ****** ************."
  • "***** **** ** - ** ********** ****** ** *** **. Not ******* **** *********, *** ***** ** *** ****** ******** than ****."
  • "**** *** ****** ******* ***** *** ** ***'* **** **** as ******* ***** *** ***** ******** "** ***** ******", ** it ** *** ******** ** **** * ****** ****** **** them."

*******

******'* ***** ****** ******* * *********** *********. **** ***** *** using ******* ********* *** **** ************ ****** ** ***** ****** ***. ******* ** ****, ****** ***** ** **** **** **** an ******** ***** (*** '****-********') *** ******* *********** **** ********* to ****** **** ***** ****. ** ****, ***** ** ** easy *** ***.

* *** ****** **** ** *** **** ****** ********* ** willing ** ****** **** *** ***** ************ ******** *** *** camera *********** *** *** *********** * *** ***********. **** ******* to ** **** *** ** ********* ***** ******* *** ********** they *** ****.

Comments (12)

Hit hard by the brand loss - even after exploding phones, washing machines, laptops etc? Not to mention political corruption

Better off I would have thought personally

Hit hard by the brand loss - even after exploding phones, washing machines, laptops etc? Not to mention political corruption

A battered Samsung is still far more valuable than a brand virtually unknown outside of Korea.

By definition, branding is a matter of opinion but the survey results show clearly opinion is pro-Samsung branding vs Hanwha.

Btw, our poll last month is relevant here:

Even though everyone taking the poll knew that the Samsung brand was being phased out a clear majority favored phasing it out as long as possible, showing overall strength of Samsung brand.

A battered Samsung is still far more valuable than a brand virtually unknown outside of Korea.

To be sure, in the two months since you wrote that there has been some additional and significant battering:

Samsung's billionaire chief is now in a jail cell with a mattress on the floor and no shower

Samsung's billionaire chief is now in a jail cell with a mattress on the floor and no shower

Lol, Samsung's brand > Hanwha's brand. That's the power of branding. It takes a lot to decay a brand.

Note: I am not saying this as a statement of who has better products just simply that Samsung has such a huge lead in name recognition over Hanwha that even such an event doesn't close the gap.

With all the heat that Hanwha taken over the branding change, even if deservedly, I see no reason to deny them this small schadenfreude.

Samsung brand takes another hit - Wikileaks Releases Info On CIA IOT Hacking Software

Yes, it is unfortunate that opinions, as uneducated as they may be, trump value.

Losing a top consumer electronics brand and gaining ownership of a $55 billion company heavily engaged and invested in security is a win for Techwin and all their partners.

Education, relationships and top value will trump brand name loss over time. Often in business, you need to take a step back in order to catapult forward.

Very useful article.

It is true that the Samsung brand loss is critical but, I think

it is a matter of time.

One of my friend is CCTV installer, he said to me that the brand power is nessesary but not enough factor for business. He said one episode; during installation there are many problems but nobody response for his phone call except Hanwah.

It means that even Hanwah loses Samsung brand, the infra-structure is same.

and the competency of Hanwha will be re-covered very soon.

Thank you for your attention.

Dear Hanwha employee,

Stop trying to spin it. Brand matters, and I say that as a general marketing critic.

Samsung is one of the top brands in the world, not in video surveillance, the whole world. Hanwha sounds like the name of the Chinese spam companies. It is going to make a difference to a lot of buyers.

It means that even Hanwah loses Samsung brand, the infra-structure is same.

Let's say the infrastructure is the same. The reality is that Samsung Techwin video surveillance has been a solid player at best. They / You have never been the most innovative or fastest to market or lowest price, etc. To be clear, I am not saying Techwin video surveillance is bad, it is simply not so incredibly strong that it can shrug off losing one of the world's most recognized brands.

Hanwha needs to commit to significant investment in video surveillance (either / or marketing, development, acquisitions) if it hopes to counter the negative impact of losing the Samsung brand.

As someone who was long in the market of purveying surveillance products of Samsung, the change of ownership has severely crippled our pursuit of pushing those products as a lead product. We tend to push Axis now, and when the feedback is that the product choice seems excessive, we bounce back with Hanwha or other.

I would also like to point out that I do not enjoy having to constantly defend my choice of Hanwha because it is a solid product. The name in the mind of 99.9% of anyone out there is CHINESE product.

We are still marketing and selling them as "Samsung cameras". They are still shipping with the Samsung name on the camera/DVR boxes. They did a 2017 color update to their shipping boxes and they all still Samsung and Wisenet in the top right corner.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Integrators

Ex-Integrator Now Growth Strategist Interviewed on Apr 24, 2019
For more than a decade, Scot MacTaggart was a security integrator (at PA-based PSX). In late 2018, he left the industry. He is now a Growth...
Arecont Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 22, 2019
Arecont's net negativity remained the same in IPVM's 2019 integrator study, though integrator's feeling became relatively more neutral compared to...
H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
Securadyne CEO: IPVM 'Entertaining For An Ignorant Few' on Apr 16, 2019
Securadyne's CEO Carey Boethel is unhappy with IPVM's report - Failed Integrator Rollup, Securadyne Sells to Guard Giant Allied. Indeed, he...
Alarm.com Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 15, 2019
The once dot com startup has evolved to become a core provider for home security and is now expanding into commercial. In their first entry in...
Failed Integrator Rollup, Securadyne Sells to Guard Giant Allied on Apr 09, 2019
One of the most ambitious integrator rollups of the decade has reached its conclusion—selling to a mega guard company. Allied Universal has...
Dahua Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 01, 2019
Dahua favorability declined, in IPVM's 2019 integrator favorability series, driven by their backdoors, resulting in mass hacking and US government...
HTTPS / SSL Video Surveillance Usage Statistics on Apr 01, 2019
HTTPS / SSL / TLS usage has become commonplace for websites to improve security and, in particular, to help mitigate attackers reading or modifying...
Panasonic Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 27, 2019
Panasonic favorability declined, as the company struggled to find its way amidst a changing market and its ill-timed decision to become a Dahua...
Casino Security Consultant Carl Lindgren Interview on Mar 26, 2019
For more than 20 years, Carl Lindgren worked as a casino surveillance pro, while being active (and sometimes outspoken) on various online video...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Verkada Salesman: IPVM "Stuck In A The Stone Age" on Apr 25, 2019
Verkada is 'tackling dinosaurs' and battling those, like IPVM, who are 'stuck in a the stone age'. Verkada's recent sales recruiting promotion...
The HIVIDEO $31 Face Detection DVR Tested on Apr 25, 2019
Face detection in a $31 DVR? That is what "HIVIDEO" (not to be confused with Hikvision, even if the company intends to do that) was promoting at...
Amazon Marketing Pro Installs of Amazon Security Systems on Apr 25, 2019
Is Amazon a threat to conventional providers like ADT, Vivint and Brinks Home Security? Many say no. Now, Amazon is advertising free in-home...
Ex-Integrator Now Growth Strategist Interviewed on Apr 24, 2019
For more than a decade, Scot MacTaggart was a security integrator (at PA-based PSX). In late 2018, he left the industry. He is now a Growth...
19 Facial Recognition Providers Profiled on Apr 23, 2019
IPVM interviewed 19 facial recognition providers at ISC West to understand their claimed accuracy, success and positioning. 9 from China, where...
Locking Down Network Connections Guide on Apr 23, 2019
Accidents and inside attacks are risks when network connections are not locked down. Security and video surveillance systems should be protected...
Hikvision Admits USA Sales Falling on Apr 22, 2019
Hikvision, in a new Chinese financial filing, has admitted that its USA sales are now falling. Less than a year after the US government passed a...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...
Arecont Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 22, 2019
Arecont's net negativity remained the same in IPVM's 2019 integrator study, though integrator's feeling became relatively more neutral compared to...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact