Hanwha Techwin Favorability Results Hurt By Samsung Loss 2016

Author: John Honovich, Published on Dec 19, 2016

The video surveillance manufacturer formerly known as Samsung; 100+ integrators told IPVM how they felt about Hanwha Techwin.

The key themes:

  • Hard hit by Samsung brand loss
  • Price / quality ratio most positive element

Inside, we share over 50 integrator comments plus analyze the overall statistics for Hanwha Techwin:

*** ***** ************ ************ ******** ***** ** *******; ***+ *********** told **** *** **** **** ***** ****** *******.

*** *** ******:

  • **** *** ** ******* ***** ****
  • ***** / ******* ***** **** ******** *******

******, ** ***** **** ** ********** ******** **** ******* *** overall ********** *** ****** *******:

[***************]

Statistics ********

****** *** **** **** ******* ******* *** ** ******* *** neutral ********:

******** ** ***** ********** ***** ********* (*****, *********, ****), ****** did ****** *** ** ********* **** ** ****** *** ******* brand, ** *** ********** ********** **** ***** **********.

Samsung ****

*** **** ****** ***** *** *** *** **** ** ******* hurt ******:

  • "**** ***** **** ***** ** *** *** ******* ****."
  • "***** **** ****** **** **** **** *******. *** * **** recognized ****."
  • "* ***** ** * ******, ****** **** ** *** *******"
  • "**** ******* *** * ********** *****. *** ******** *** ******* move **** ** ******** *** ******* ****."
  • "*****'* **** ****. *** **** ****** ** *** ***** **** changed *** ****. *** ** **** ** ****."
  • "****** *** ******* ***** *** **** ****. ***** ****** *******, but **'* ********** ****** ** **** ******* *** **** ***********."
  • "**** **** **** ******* **** **** *** *** ****."
  • "******* *** *** **** ********* **********, ** *** *** **** to ******** ********* **** **** **** *** ** ********** ** the ** ******** *****."
  • "********* ***** ** ******* **** *** ******* ******* ***** ** wary."
  • "******* -> ******* -> ******... ******** ******* *** ******* ****. Who ***** **** ********?"
  • "** **** **** **** ** *** ******* **********, *** ** was **** ** **** *** ******* ****. *** *** ****** and ********* **** ******* *** *** *** ****** *** *** future **** *** *** * *** ** ********* ***** *** them."
  • "*** ***** ******* ****** ******* ***** ******** ** *** ***** frankly ****** ** ***."
  • "***? ******* **** **** **** ******* *********** ***** *** ******* and ******** *** **********."
  • "********* ****-*** ******* ***** *******. *** *** *****, ****** ***** relative *******. **** **** ** ******* ********** ***** **** **** years."
  • "*** **** ** ****** ******* *** * ****-**** ***********."
  • "**** ***** ******** ***** **** ******* ******* **."

**** *********** **** ******* ****** ************ ****** *** *******:

  • "***** ***** ** **** *** ***** **** ****. ****** **** a ******* *****, ***** ** ***** ******* ********."
  • "******* ****."
  • "** ****. *** *** **** ** *** ******* ***** ** not ** ***** ****."
  • "*****"
  • "**** *** *** ******* ********* ** ******** *** ** ******** security ******."

****** ******* *** *** **** ********* **** ***********, * ***-****** number ** *********** **** *** ** **** *** ****** ***:

  • "* ***'* **** ***** ********."
  • "***** ***** ***** ****."
  • "***'* **** *** *******."
  • "***** ***** ** **."
  • "***'* **** **** ***** ****."
  • "***'* **** ***** ****."
  • "*** ******** **** ****."

Price / *******

** *** ******** ****, * *********** ****** ** *********** ******* Hanwha's ***** / *******:

  • "*****/******* ***** ***** ****, *** * **** ***** ** *******. Many ******** *** **** ******."
  • "*** **** *******, **** **** **** *******, ***** ******* **** quality."
  • "**** ***** *** *** *****, ********* ** ***** ******."
  • "**** ******* *** ********* ***** ***********. ***** *** * *** higher **** *** ****** *******."
  • "** **** **** ******* / ******* ******* **** ** * secondary **** ** *** **** **** ******** *** * *** years. **'* ***** ** ********* ***** **** ** ***** **** is *** *********."
  • "**** ***** ******* ****."
  • "*****'* * *** ** **** ***** ******. ****'** ********** **** everything, ****** *************, **** **** *** ********, **** **** **** us ** *** ********. **** *** **** * ****** ********** - **** ******** ** ************* - *** ****** ***** **** overall ***** *** **."
  • "**** **** **** *** * **** ***** *****. **** * nicely ******* ******* ****. *** ** *** ****** ******* **** products."
  • "****** ******* ***** ******* ******* **** ** *** ***** *** the ******* ***** *** ** *********."
  • "**** ***** *'** **** ** *** ********...********** *** *** ***** point."
  • "**** ******* *** * ********** *****."
  • "**** ******* ************* ******. ** ** *** **** *** *** 1/3 ** *** ***** ** ** ****** ***** ** *** Chinese *** **** ******** *** ******* *** ***** ** ****** Chinese."

******, ******'* ******* ** *** ** *** ******* ** ******* products. ***** ** *** ******* **** ***, *** *********** ** premium ***** *** *** ****** **** *** * ****** ***********.

*******, * ****** ** *********** *** ******'* ******** ** **** stuck ** *** ****** **** * ****** ***** / ******* combination:

  • "*** ************ ********, *** *** **** *****, *** *** **** technology."
  • "**** ******* ************, ******* ** *** ****."
  • "**** ******* ****** ************."
  • "***** **** ** - ** ********** ****** ** *** **. Not ******* **** *********, *** ***** ** *** ****** ******** than ****."
  • "**** *** ****** ******* ***** *** ** ***'* **** **** as ******* ***** *** ***** ******** "** ***** ******", ** it ** *** ******** ** **** * ****** ****** **** them."

*******

******'* ***** ****** ******* * *********** *********. **** ***** *** using ******* ********* *** **** ************ ****** ** ***** ****** ***. ******* ** ****, ****** ***** ** **** **** **** an ******** ***** (*** '****-********') *** ******* *********** **** ********* to ****** **** ***** ****. ** ****, ***** ** ** easy *** ***.

* *** ****** **** ** *** **** ****** ********* ** willing ** ****** **** *** ***** ************ ******** *** *** camera *********** *** *** *********** * *** ***********. **** ******* to ** **** *** ** ********* ***** ******* *** ********** they *** ****.

Comments (12)

Hit hard by the brand loss - even after exploding phones, washing machines, laptops etc? Not to mention political corruption

Better off I would have thought personally

Hit hard by the brand loss - even after exploding phones, washing machines, laptops etc? Not to mention political corruption

A battered Samsung is still far more valuable than a brand virtually unknown outside of Korea.

By definition, branding is a matter of opinion but the survey results show clearly opinion is pro-Samsung branding vs Hanwha.

Btw, our poll last month is relevant here:

Even though everyone taking the poll knew that the Samsung brand was being phased out a clear majority favored phasing it out as long as possible, showing overall strength of Samsung brand.

A battered Samsung is still far more valuable than a brand virtually unknown outside of Korea.

To be sure, in the two months since you wrote that there has been some additional and significant battering:

Samsung's billionaire chief is now in a jail cell with a mattress on the floor and no shower

Samsung's billionaire chief is now in a jail cell with a mattress on the floor and no shower

Lol, Samsung's brand > Hanwha's brand. That's the power of branding. It takes a lot to decay a brand.

Note: I am not saying this as a statement of who has better products just simply that Samsung has such a huge lead in name recognition over Hanwha that even such an event doesn't close the gap.

With all the heat that Hanwha taken over the branding change, even if deservedly, I see no reason to deny them this small schadenfreude.

Samsung brand takes another hit - Wikileaks Releases Info On CIA IOT Hacking Software

Yes, it is unfortunate that opinions, as uneducated as they may be, trump value.

Losing a top consumer electronics brand and gaining ownership of a $55 billion company heavily engaged and invested in security is a win for Techwin and all their partners.

Education, relationships and top value will trump brand name loss over time. Often in business, you need to take a step back in order to catapult forward.

Very useful article.

It is true that the Samsung brand loss is critical but, I think

it is a matter of time.

One of my friend is CCTV installer, he said to me that the brand power is nessesary but not enough factor for business. He said one episode; during installation there are many problems but nobody response for his phone call except Hanwah.

It means that even Hanwah loses Samsung brand, the infra-structure is same.

and the competency of Hanwha will be re-covered very soon.

Thank you for your attention.

Dear Hanwha employee,

Stop trying to spin it. Brand matters, and I say that as a general marketing critic.

Samsung is one of the top brands in the world, not in video surveillance, the whole world. Hanwha sounds like the name of the Chinese spam companies. It is going to make a difference to a lot of buyers.

It means that even Hanwah loses Samsung brand, the infra-structure is same.

Let's say the infrastructure is the same. The reality is that Samsung Techwin video surveillance has been a solid player at best. They / You have never been the most innovative or fastest to market or lowest price, etc. To be clear, I am not saying Techwin video surveillance is bad, it is simply not so incredibly strong that it can shrug off losing one of the world's most recognized brands.

Hanwha needs to commit to significant investment in video surveillance (either / or marketing, development, acquisitions) if it hopes to counter the negative impact of losing the Samsung brand.

As someone who was long in the market of purveying surveillance products of Samsung, the change of ownership has severely crippled our pursuit of pushing those products as a lead product. We tend to push Axis now, and when the feedback is that the product choice seems excessive, we bounce back with Hanwha or other.

I would also like to point out that I do not enjoy having to constantly defend my choice of Hanwha because it is a solid product. The name in the mind of 99.9% of anyone out there is CHINESE product.

We are still marketing and selling them as "Samsung cameras". They are still shipping with the Samsung name on the camera/DVR boxes. They did a 2017 color update to their shipping boxes and they all still Samsung and Wisenet in the top right corner.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Integrators

Uniview / UNV Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 12, 2019
Uniview / UNV, the self-proclaimed #3 China manufacturer, while starting late, has been working to make inroads internationally. In IPVM's 2019...
Barnes Buchanan 2019: Despite 'Strange Narrative' Great Time To Be In Security on Feb 11, 2019
A "strange narrative" is being spun, said Michael Barnes at the 2019 Barnes Buchanan Conference. However, despite that narrative, it is a "great...
FLIR Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 08, 2019
FLIR has had a challenging past few years including FLIR Security business struggling, FLIR restructuring their security division and FLIR selling...
Sony Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 05, 2019
Sony Favorability amongst integrators improved moderately compared to their 2017 favorability results, with a modest net positive...
Hanwha Techwin Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 31, 2019
Hanwha Techwin's favorability results surged, in IPVM's 2019 study, going from barely neutral in 2016 to strongly net positive, as the results...
Vivotek Favorability Report 2019 on Jan 29, 2019
Taiwanese video surveillance manufacturers, even relatively large ones like Vivotek, have lost ground in the PRC-China-driven race to the bottom....
Genetec Favorability Report 2019 on Jan 25, 2019
Genetec's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2017, with 2019 results showing solid, but...
Bosch Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 23, 2019
Bosch's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2017, with 2019 results showing strong net...
Milestone Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 21, 2019
Milestone's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2016. While the industry has been...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Casino Surveillance Pro Interview: James Lathrop on Feb 15, 2019
James Lathrop has been working in casinos for almost 25 years. During that time, he says he has held "just about every job you can do in the...
Hikvision 2018 Revenue Tops $7 Billion USD But Growth Slows To Low on Feb 15, 2019
Hikvision's annual revenue topped $7 billion for the first time in 2018, although growth slowed sharply. In this post, we analyze the latest...
Hanwha Smaller Multi Imager Tested (PNM-9000VQ) on Feb 14, 2019
Hanwha's first repositionable multi imager PNM-9081VQ tested well, but was huge, over 12" wide and weighing in at over 10 pounds. Now, they have...
ADT And 'The Defenders' Silent About Massive Complaints on Feb 14, 2019
ADT's largest dealer, "The Defenders" has been the subject of a massive number of complaints over many years and many forums, most recently a CBS...
Hikvision Chairman Praises United Front on Feb 14, 2019
Hikvision’s controlling shareholder held a meeting last month praising the United Front, a Communist Party organization known for its secretive...
Sales Turnover At Anyvision on Feb 13, 2019
Anyvision raised a $43 million Series A and according to their newest investor: what you need to do is push the gas pedal and build an...
Cisco Meraki Cloud VMS/Cameras Tested on Feb 13, 2019
Cisco Meraki says their cameras "bring Meraki magic to the enterprise video security world". According to Meraki, their magic is their management...
Uniview / UNV Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 12, 2019
Uniview / UNV, the self-proclaimed #3 China manufacturer, while starting late, has been working to make inroads internationally. In IPVM's 2019...
Nortek Mobile Access Reader BluePass Examined on Feb 12, 2019
Nortek's Linear access control division claims to make mobile credentials "more secure and easier to use than ever before" with their BluePass...
Solink Raises $12 Million - Company Profile on Feb 12, 2019
Most industry professionals have never heard of Solink, a company whose tagline is: It's time to revolutionize the way business uses...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact