Remove Dahua and Hikvision Equipment "Immediately" Or Else Banned From US Government Contracts

By Charles Rollet, Published Jul 10, 2020, 09:34am EDT

The US government has directed contractors to remove covered equipment, such as Dahua, Hikvision, and Huawei Hisilicon products, "immediately." If they do not by August 2021, the contractor will be banned from US government contracts.

IPVM Image

This follows the US DoD declaration that they "can no longer do business" with contractors using Dahua, Hikvision or Huawei, in April, and as the rule implementing the NDAA ban's 'blacklist' clause, which bans anyone who "uses" banned equipment from dealing with the federal government is scheduled to go into effect next month, on August 13.

GSA Says Remove Equipment "Immediately"

On July 8, the GSA released a Q&A about the NDAA ban (Section 889):

IPVM Image

GSA answered the following question about how the ban will be implemented and what to do about removing covered equipment:

Does Section 889 apply retroactively, to contracts awarded prior to the effective date, and to equipment placed (or ordered but perhaps not yet placed) prior to the effective date, and if so, what exposure/risk do contractors face? Will contractors be required to remove and replace installed equipment, cancel existing orders, or take some other measure(s)? [emphasis added]

The GSA told contractors to remove covered equipment "immediately" and if this is not done by August 13th 2021, this will result in blacklisting.

Contractors are required to remove covered telecommunications or video surveillance equipment or services immediately. Any covered equipment that cannot be removed immediately should be considered medium or high risk and the contractor must complete a wavier. Any contractor who does not remove all covered equipment or services by August 13, 2021 will be removed from all schedules or contracts will be canceled. [emphasis added]

Getting * ****** ******** ******* ********* ****** **** ********

** **** ********* ****** be ******* ***********, "*** contractor **** ********" * waiver. *** *** ********* how **** ******* *** be ********. *** ******* is *** ****, ********* that *** ********** ****** considering ***** *** ****** equipment ****** * "********** justification" ** *** **** of ************ ********* ******:

(*) *** ****** *** be ********, *** * period *** ** ****** beyond ****** **, ****, if *** ********** ****** seeking *** ****** ******* to *** **** ** the ********* ******: (*) A ********** ************* *** the ********** **** ** implement *** ************ ***** 4.2102(a), ** ********** ** the **** ** *** executive ******; *** (**) A **** *** ******** laydown ** *********** ** the ********* ** ******* telecommunications ** ***** ************ equipment ** ******** ** the ******** ****** ***** and * *****-*** **** to ********* **** ******* telecommunications ** ***** ************ equipment ** ******** **** the ******** *******.

***** *** **** ***** of ******** ********, ***** with *** *********** ** approving ****** ********* ***** (particularly** * **** ** high **-***** ********), ******* **** * waiver *** *** ** a ******** ******** *** most.

Blacklist ****** ***** *** ********, ***** ***** "**********"

*** ******* *********** ********** ('FAR' ****) ********* ******* how *** ********* ****** will ** *********** *** still *** **** ********, and ** ***** *** been *********,******* * ********** * *-**** ************** delay **** ******** ***** groups (** **** ** SIA).

*****,******* ************ *** ***** ***** is "**********" *** ***, with **** ******, ****** director ** *** ***** House ****** ** ********** and ******, ******* ******* the ** **** ** "fully ************ *** ***":

*** ***** ************** ** keeping *** ********** ****** against ********* ******** **** Huawei ** ***** ************ the *** ** ******* procurement.

IPVM Image

Hard ******** *** ****

**** **** ****** * hard ******** *** **** in *** ********. ***** surveillance ******* **** ********* from *** *** ****** and **** ************ ** Dahua, *********, *** ****** Hisilcion ***** ********. **** will ********* ****** ** simply *** ** *** business **** *** ** government, ********** ** **** are ******* ********* **** few ** ********** *************. However, ****** ********* ** those **** **** ******** US ********** ******** **** likely **** ******* ***** products.

Hit ** ***** *** *********

**** ***** *** *********'* business *** **** ********** by *** ** **********'* actions **** *** **** two *****, **** ****** of ***** ********* ******** by * ****** ** minimize ******. ***** *** booming ***** ****** ****** has ****** *** * giant *** *************, ** government ********* ** ********* to ****** ***** ********* would *** ******* ******** on *** *******'* ** business.

Conclusion: US ********** ******* ******* **** ****

*** ******* ********** ** clearly **** ******* ***** removing ****** ********* **** its ****** *****. *** integrator *** ***** ** continue ** **** ******* business ***** ** ********* decision *** ****** ** Dahua, *********, *** ****** Hisilicon ***** ********.

*** **** **** ** the ******** ** *** final ************ ****. **** that ** *******, ** will ******* *** *********.

Vote / ****

Comments (65)

*** ******* **** *** numerous ***'* **** ***** private ***** ********* *** Dahua ********? * **** you've ****** ********** **** these *** ******** ** the ***, *** * question ******* *** *** has *** ********* ******* into ***** *** ******** to *** ** ****.

*********, **'* * ***** proposition ** ** ********** if **** **** ** install * ****** *** camera. *******, * *** anticipate **** **** ******** would ***** ** ********* unknowingly. ********?

** *** *** **** is ******* ***** ********* this ***, **** **** research *** *******, ***** penalty ** *** *** those *************/*********** *** ******* who ***** ***** *******, a ******** ******* ** the ****** *********, ** include ************'* ****, *** part ******* ** *** cameras **** ***** ***** their *** ****, *** the ***/****** ******* ** they *** ** **********.

******* ****, **** **** is **** ******* *** anyway? ** ***** **** be ****** *** ********* optics *** ******* ****.

* **** *** * fact **** ***** ***'* know **** ****'** *******. I *** ****** ** sell * ********* ****** and * ********* **** their ********* ******** ** not **** ******** (** the **** **** *** huge *************** **** ****'* been *******) *** **** immoral. **** **** "** no, ** ***'* **** Hikvision, ** **** Brand>" *** *** ********** no ****.

**** ****'* **** ******, because ***** */* ******** and ******** ****, ******* are **** *** **** task **** ***** ************. This **** **** ** this **** ******* ** IPVM, ***** **** ***** of ** ****, ** who ****, ** *** have *** ****, **** about ***** ******. ** cannot **** ** *** integrators ** ********** ** educate *** *** *****, or ****** **** **********.

***** ** **** **** been ******** ** **** of *****, **** ***** I *** *** ***** to *** *** **** was * ***** ***.

**** ** *** **** was ********* **** ****** that **** ********** ** fired **** ***** * companies ** **** ********** took **** ******* *****.

**** ****** **** **, sent **** ** ****** in *** ********** **** worked ** **** ** security ****** ** ** dealing **** **** *****.

*** ***** ** ********* at **** ****** ** when **** **** **** terminated *** **** **** they **** *** ***** the ***** ***** **** they ****** *********.

****** **** **** ** add *****, *** ******* to :

*** ********* ** *******, Mark ***** ** ** you ***'* **** **** address ** *****, **** to

  1. ****.********.***.***.*******@****.***.
  2. *** *** **** ******* THE **********,

**** ********. * ********* checking *** ****'* *****:

** ****** (*******) **** ************ the ********* ******, *** ********** ****** that "******* ** ****** ** accurate ************** ** *** Government *********** * ****** of ******** **** *** lead ** ************, ***********, and ********* ************":

IPVM Image

***** **** *** ********* need ** ** ******* FROM?

** ** *** ***** from *** ******** ****** if **** **** ****** equipment **** *** ********* by *********** ** ******* government *********. **, ** it ***** ***** *********** need ** ****** **** equipment **** ***** *** facilities.

** **** **** ** reads ** ** ** cover ********* ********* ** government **********, *** *** "remove ***********" **** ***** me ***** **** ** not ****** ****** *********** to **** ** ***** sites *** **** ***** pulling ******* **** ******* a **** ** ******* it.

** *****’* ***** *****, for ******* ** *** have ********* * ****** of *** ******* ** your *** ****** **** they ** *******? ** is ** **** ** US ********** *****.

* ***** **** ******** if **** *** ** be ******* **** ********* that *** ***** ***** non ******* ********** ****. I **** *** ** cameras ** * ********* for * ******** **** does ******** ******* *** they **** **** *********. Do **** **** ** remove ****?

**** ***** ********* ************* at ******* *** ***** governments (******, ****, ********, etc.)? * *** ******* school ********* **** **** tell ** **** ****'* much **** ***** ********* security ****** *** **** price *** *** ********* factor.

** ******* ** *** majority ** ***** ******* receive **** **** ** federal ********** (*-****/******* *****) and ** **** **** into *** **** **** and ***** **** ** be ******* *** **** is **** * ***** needs ** ** *********.

*** *** ****** "****** immediately", ******* ** **** state ************ **** **** happen ** **** ** not **** ** ****** 13, ****.

***'** *****, ***** *** no ********* ** ******* the *** **** *** entity's *** ********* ** those ** ********** ******** or ****. ****** **** ************ *** blacklist ********** **** *** **** further ******* ** ********. However, ** **** ***** that "***********" ** ****** equipment ****** ** "******* services" *.*. ******* ********* after ****** **, ****.

******: *** *** **** does ***** **** *** the "***************" ******** ** the ******* **********, "*******the ****** ******" uses covered equipment/services must be disclosed:

IPVM Image

*** *** **** **** that "**** ******** ********* relationships **** *** ************* or ********":

IPVM Image

****** *******, *******, ** ***** unclear ** ** ******* they **** ******** *** the ******'* *** ********* or ********** ********* ********* as ****.

*******, **** *********!

**** ** **** ****** be * ******** ** those *** **** **** reporting.

*** *******, **** ** August ****, ** ********:**** ***** ** ********* At ***, ****** **** Selling ** ** ******* Government, **** ** ****. ** ***** ** the****** ******, *** ***** ***** Services ********* ************** ******** who **** ****, ** that ****:

*** *********** ** ****** selling ** *** **********. If *** “******” ***** Hikvision / ***** ******* in *** *** ** anyone, **** *** ****** from ***** ******** **** the ******* **********

**** **** ****** ********* and *** ******* ** get ****** ********** **** the ** **********, *** UK **********, *** ********** government, ***., ***** *** value ** *******.

* *** ** ******** people **** **** ** denial.

* *** ** ******** people **** **** ** denial.

*******, *** * *** of ******** ****** **** to ** ************** ******** as ****.

** ******** ****** *** essentially ****** ***** *** on ***** *******:

1) ***** "*******" ********* ***** ** ** ******* ** *********** ** *** ** ******?

*) ********** ***** ********* sold ** *** **********

*) ********** ***** ********* deployed **********

*) ***-********** ***** ********* sold ** *** ********** to ***-********** *******

*) *** ** *** above

2) *** *********** ****** ******** ** ********** ********** ***** ********* ******* ***********?

3) **** **** ****** **** **** ** **** ** **** *** *********, *** *** **** **?

4) ** * ********** ******* *** **** *** *******, **** **** ***** ** ******?

** ***** ********* ***'* have * ********** ****** yet, ****** *** ****** to **** ****** ********* interpretations, ***** ** ***** own *************.

****, * **** *** new ***, ****, **'* no ******* **** *** previous ****.

*** *** ******* **** the *** **** ***** very ****** ******** ** removals. ****** *** ********, *** **** **** state ** * ******* that *** ****** "**** likely" ** ** "**** of *** ********** ****" is ********** "**** ** removal" ** ****** *********:

IPVM Image

**** ******* *** ******* not ******** ****** ********* will *** ** ********** "compliant" *** **** ***********. However, ******** ******* *** still *******, ***** *** new **** **** *** define "***"; ** ****, however, ***** **** "***********" of ****** ********* ****** as "******* ********" (*.*. reason *** ************).

****** **** ****? ***** network? ***** ********? ***** warehouse? ***** ********** *****? Their ********* *****? (***** be ** * ****)

***** ******** ******* * don’t ****** *** ****’* they **** ****** **** financial ************?

** *********, ****** *** your ********. ***** ** no ******* ********** *** on *****/*********/****** ********* *** specific ** ********* ************.

*******,** **** ******* ******* this ****, *** ***** ***** is********* * *** ************** ***** *** "******* ***** [*****/****] **********" from "***** ********** *****" on *** *********** ******. If **** *** ********** passes, **'* ******** ** would ****** * ************ community **** ***** ******* funds ** ******** ********, for *******.

** ****************** ** ****** ******* government ********?

** ***** ***?

*** ** **** **** it?

*** **** ** ****?

***?

******* (***'* ******) *** materials ** ** ***'* have ******* **** ** Chinese **** ******* ******** landfills. ******* **** ********* products.

**** **'* ** **** if *** ** ********** would ******* ******** ******** in *** *** **** the *.*.*. ******** *** expansion ** ******* ********* into *** *** ***** other *********. **'* ** great ** ***** ***** subsidize *** **** **** China ** ******* ** Japan (** ****** ***... subsidize ** ******** *******?) But, **, **'** ***** it *** ** *** own ****, ** *** own ****.

* ******* **** ******* is ****** **** *******? The *********** *** **** the **** *-* ***** are : "*** **** that ******* ** ******?" / "*** *** *** actually, *** * ***'* care ******, ****** ** high. ****** ***** ****** and ********!"

******** ********. * ***'* want *** ******* ********** subsidizing ******* ********. ** they **** ** "****" business **** *** ****** overburdensome ***********. **** **** is * ***** ********* than ******** ***** ******* of ***** **** ******* and *** ***********.

*** **** ******* **** - ********* *** ****** the ********* ** ******* supply ****** *** *** are ****** ***.

*** **** ******* *** manipulated.

**** ********>" ** ***** be ***** ** ***** would *********"

*- ** ** "********* Trump".

*- ** *** **** pushing ** *** ******* jobs **** ** ** or ***'* *** **** or ** *** ****.

*- *** **** *** jobs ** ***** ********* and ********* ***** ****** and ******** ***** ************, so *** *** **** only *****?

"********* *****" *** **** trying ** *** **** back ** *** ** so ** **** **** unemployed ** ***'* *** care ***** *** ****** here ******* ****. *** a ********, *** ******* read **** **** ********. Lets **** *** *** jobs ****!

** **** *******:

*******- "*"

***********- *

** **** *******: *******- "0" ***********- *

***'* ***** ******** **** that. ******* ****** ** you ** ***** ** wrong ** ******* *** a ****** ** "**".

*- ** ** "********* Trump".

**** **'* ****, "*** Impeached ********* *****".

***, *** ****** **********, just ****** "*****" ** sufficiently ********, ******* *******, and **** ****** ******* an ********** *********** **** this **** ** ****** years, ** **** ****** from ***.

******* ** ** ***** government ********. *** *** agency **** **** ** to ** ***** **** follow ********** ** ***** inventory.

****, *** ***** ****** removing. ** *****'* *** anything ***** *********. **** requires ***********.

****, *** *********** ********* get **** *** ***** they *** ** **** unless **** *** **** time ** **** ********* in ***** **** **** are ***** **** *** their ****. ** ****** the *** ***** ** procurement ** *** ********* a * ****** ** ready ** **** ****'* down **** ** *******, etc...

**** **** **** **** the *********** **** ** remove ***** ******* **** their ******* ***** *****?

** **** ********* ***** previously *********?

*** **** *********** **** period?

******** * ******* ** the ******* ** **** equipment, ** ******* **** in *** *********** ***** ********* **-****-************ Asked ********* *.**** **, 2020

*** **** **** ******-

*** *********** **** ​**** not​ ***** ** “[*]***************** equipment **** ****** ***** or ******** **** **** traffic ** ****** ********** into *** **** **** or ******* **** **** equipment ********* ** ********* handles.”

***** ** **** ** exemption ** ************* **** separate ****** ******* ** it's *** ******** ******/****?

** **** ****, * NVR **** ******* **** camera *** ***** **** networks ***** ** **********, but ******* ***** *** be.

********?

**** ******** ** *** experiences **** *** ***. In *** ***** ***** as **** ** *** were *** ********* ** the ******* ** ******* you ***** *** *** access *** ***** ** private ******** ****** *** facility. ** ****** ***** that *** ****** *** all ******** **** ** approved ** *** *********** agencies **/** *****. ** are ****** ** ** Army, ******** *** ******** Guard *** *********** ***, at * ******* *** (Certificate ** *************) ** RMF (**** ********** *********) ATO (********* ** *******) for *** *** *** networks. ******* ******** ******** RMF ***.

***** ** **** ** exemption ** ************* **** separate ****** ******* ** it's *** ******** ******/****?

**** ***** ** * fair **************, *** ***** on *** ******** ** far, *** ********* ** judgedà ** *****,******* **** ** ** independent ** *** ****** usage ** **********.

***** *** ****** *** the *******, (** * should *** *** ************** *** *******), *** of *** *** ** place *** **** ******* on * *******, ** would ** ********** *******.

** *** ***** ****, a *** **** ****** would *** **.

***** ** **** ** exemption ** ************* **** separate ****** ******* ** it's *** ******** ******/****?

****, **** **** ** time ****** **** ********* this, ***, ** **** mentions, ** **** **** no ******** **** *** US ********** ** ************ it ** **** ***.

**** ** ****** *** Blacklist **** **** ***** to ************ **** **** Hik/Dahua *** **** **** to *** ******* ***?

** **#*, ****** *** the ********. ***** *******'* ********* *** **** ************ the ********* ******, ***** was **** ********.

*** ***** ****** ** that ***** ** ***** no ***** ********** ** what "****" ***** ** we ***'* **** ** merely ******* * ****** product *********** "***". "***********" of * ****** ******* though ** ********** "******* services" ******* ** *********, however.

** *** "****" ********, we **** ******** *** more ******* **** *** final **** ** ****** after *** ** *** public ******* ******.

*** ***** ****** *** ********:

IPVM Image

** **** ** * full ******** ****** ** Monday.

* ***** ********** **** some ************* ** *** rules. * *** *********:

*. *** ******* ** we **** * ******** to * ****** ******* years *** **** ******** Hikvision ** **** ***** banned ***** *** **** company **** ******** **** the ******* ********** *** they ******** ** ****** those *******.

*. *** ** ** longer **** ** **** banned ******** ** ********** companies ** ** **** bid *** ***-****** ******** to ********** ******** ***** pretty **** *** ********** entity, ******* ****/******/***** **** some **** ** ******* from *** ******* **********.

***** ** *** *** of *** *** ** is **** ** *** to ** **** ** get ***** **** ***** from ***** ****** ********* it **** *** **** sense **** * ***** perspective ** **** ***** to *** ** *** clients ** *** *** calls *** **** ** be ******* ***** ** my ************** ** **** has **** ********* ** far.

*. *****, *** ******:

*********** *** ******** ** remove ******* ****************** ** video ************ ********* ** services***********.

*** ***** ** **** neither ****** *** *** *********** "****". ******* *** nor *** *** **** detail *** ******** *******, either. ** ****** **** clarity **** *** ***** rule ** ********* ***** 60 **** ** ****** comments.

*******, *** ***** ************* ** "***********" ** a ****** ****, ***** is *********** ** "******* services". ** ** **** client ** ***** ******* maintain ***** ********* *******, there ** * **** real **** ** ************ starting ****** **, ****.

*** *** ***** *******'* ****** **** ** the *** **** ****.

*. **** ********. *** blacklist ****** **** ******* the ******* *********** *****. However,** **** ******* ******* this ****, *** ***** ***** is********* * *** ************** ***** *** "******* ***** [*****/****] **********" from "***** ********** *****" on *** *********** ******.

* ****** ***** ***** directions *****'* ** ***** about ***'* ************** ** is ** ** ****. Not ***** ******* *** "contractors" ***** *** ****, where ** ** ****, we ** ** ********* as ********'* ** *** premise... *** ***'* *** is ** ** **** the $$$ *** **** with **** * *****/***** notice???

****, **** ** **** rule ** ** **** "Official"? * **** **** it's ******** ** ****???

****** **** *** **** released***** **** **** ** published ** *** ******* Register. **** ** *** Federal ********, ***** *** 60 **** *** ****** comments, ***** ***** * final **** **** ** published.

**** **** ***** ** Avigilon *** ** ***** by ******** *** ** owned ** ****** (******* Company) ******* ** ******* in ****?

******** ********* ** *** owned ** ******. ***** did *** *** **** (mis)information ****?

******** ******** ** ***** by ****** *** ******** Solutions

******** ******** ** **** the ******* **** ***** cell ******.

**** **** *** **** their **/******/****** ******** ** Lenovo. ****** *****'* *** IBM. *** ***** ***** lots ** ***** ***** that *** ******* ** do **** ******/*****.

#**, ****** **** ******* explained ******** ** ***** by ***'* ******** ********* not ******.

******* ********: **** *** just ********** ******** ***** this ** *** ***** reps ******** ******* **** other **** ********* ***** claim?

* *** * ******* the ******* ***** ***** in ******* ***** *******. Cheap ******* ********* *** a ****** ****** **** a ****** ********* * dumpster. *** ** **** at ***** *** ********* will ** ****** ** upgrade ***. ***'* **** hope **** **** ****** enough ** ****** *** capital ******* ** ******** equipment.

******** ********. ***** *** mammoth ******** ******** *** & *** **** *** I ***'* *** *** you *** ***** **** clients ******* ******** ** low. *******, ** *** seriously ***** ******* **** protect *********? *** ** government **** **** ******* for ********* **? ** cameras ** *** *** anywhere *** ********** ******** more ******** **** *******?

******* * ************* **** post - *** ** sure ***** **** *** don't **** ** ***** anything ******* ** **** was * ********** ************.

**, * **** ***** this ******, *** ****** seems ** **** ** answer. **** ** *** well *** ****, *** What ** *** ********* by ***** **** ** Enforced? *** *** *** camera ******? * **** a ********** **** ********* to ******* *** **** cheapest ********* *** ****, that ** **** *** support, *** ** ** going ****** *** ******* these ********* ****** ******* Authority ********. *** *** folks ***** *** ******** about *** ****. **, where ** * **** him **? ******* **** an ******?

* ***** ****** *** have *** ** *** ways:

** ***** ****** *** based ** * ********** contract *** *** ******* the ********** *********** *******.

**

*** ******* ********* ****** have * ******* ********** department **** *** ***** contact.

*** ******* ******* ******* takes ****** * ***** from *****, ****** **, 2020.

* *** ******* ****** tomorrow ** ***** ** report ** *** ********** but ** **** ******** continue ***** ****** **, 2020, ** ***** ** interested ** ********* ** it.

**** **** **** ****** in ****** ** ****?

*** *** *** *** US ********** ****** ** use ***** ********, ***:*** ** ***** *** Hikvision ** *** ** Gov ***

****** *** **** *******! The ****** ** ****** this ** ***** ** the******* ********** *** ****** ** the ********* *******, ******* and ***** ***********.

***** ***. **** ** exactly **** * *** looking ***.

********** ** ********, **'* time *** ****** ****** see **** ****** *** China's ***** ********* ******** for *** ******** *** cyber ******** ******************** **** **** ***.

*** ****** ****** ****** also ** ******** ** take **** **** ** action ** *** ********** AND *********** *** ******* in *** **** ******.

********** ** ********, **'* time *** ****** ****** see **** ****** *** China's ***** ********* ******** for *** ******** *** cyber ******** ******************** **** **** ***.

*** ***.********* ******** **** been ****** ********* *** the ******* ******* ** more ** **** *****. When ** ***** ** being * ******* ***.********* - **'* * *** vague ** ****.

*** **** **** * look ** ***** *** probably ******* **** **********?

*********...........**** *** *** **** Kaspersky **** ***** ***. We *** *** ********* distracted ** ***** *******..........*** I ******* *** ******** would ****** ** **** way ******.

**** ****** **** ** Avycon *** *** ****** chipset?

* ***'* **** *** cameras ** *****, *** I **** * ******* model *** **** ******, the **** *********** ***** on *** ***** ***:

** ***** (***** *****)

*** (*****)

** **** (******)

***** *********** (**)

******: ****** ****** * ********** ******* ***. ** doesn't **** **** ***, but **** ********* ******** actions **** *********** ** this ***** ** ****, notably:

IPVM Image

****...** ****** *, **** of *******, *** ** the ****** ***?

*** *** **** *** specify. * ***** **** are ************ *** ********** the ***** ******* *** specific ***** ********* *** must ****** ******** ********* and *** **** **** paid *** **** *** been ******** ***.

** ***** ** ** saying **** “**** ** removal” ***** ***** ** the ********** ** *** way ** “******” **** the ********** **** ** considered ********* ** *** future.

****, ****, *****, *****.

** **** **** ** “un-funded *******” ** *** government *********** ****. ******* this ****** *** ******** exceptions, *** *** ********* to ***** ************.

***** *** *********.

*******, *** ** *** banned ** *** **********, not **** ******* **** a **** *** ** as *** *********** ** sell.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,653 reports, 896 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now
Loading Related Reports