New GDPR Guidelines for Video Surveillance Examined

By: Charles Rollet, Published on Jul 18, 2019

The highest-level EU data protection authority has issued a new series of provisional video surveillance guidelines.

While GDPR has been in effect for more than a year, how it applies to video surveillance has often been unclear, as we explained in our original GDPR for Video Surveillance Guide.

Now, these new guidelines (though not final and subject to public comment for the next two months) provide good insight and clarifications to common questions about video surveillance GDPR compliance.

In this post, we explain and analyze the new guidelines, including:

  • EDPB's Background
  • Legal Impact of Guidelines
  • Public Signage: Example Provided
  • Signage Positioning
  • DPIAs Required for Large Scale Biometrics
  • Storage: Additional Justification Required for Over 3 Days
  • Some Analytics Not Considered Biometrics
  • VIP Recognition: Consent Required from Everyone, Not Just VIPs
  • Facial Recognition: Why Notification Via Signage Likely Not Enough
  • Data Requests/Anonymization
  • No Clarity on Types of Encryption Required
  • Certification Not Covered
  • Dummy Cameras Not Covered By GDPR

*** *******-***** ** **** protection ********* *** ****** a *** ****** ** provisional ***** ************ **********.

***** **** *** **** in ****** *** **** than * ****, *** it ******* ** ***** surveillance *** ***** **** unclear, ** ** ********* in *** ************ *** ***** ************ Guide.

***, ***** *** ********** (though *** ***** *** subject ** ****** ******* for *** **** *** months) ******* **** ******* and ************** ** ****** questions ***** ***** ************ GDPR **********.

** **** ****, ** explain *** ******* *** new **********, *********:

  • ****'* **********
  • ***** ****** ** **********
  • ****** *******: ******* ********
  • ******* ***********
  • ***** ******** *** ***** Scale **********
  • *******: ********** ************* ******** for **** * ****
  • **** ********* *** ********** Biometrics
  • *** ***********: ******* ******** from ********, *** **** VIPs
  • ****** ***********: *** ************ Via ******* ****** *** Enough
  • **** ********/*************
  • ** ******* ** ***** of ********** ********
  • ************* *** *******
  • ***** ******* *** ******* By ****

[***************]

EDPB ********** *** ***** ******

*** ****** ** *** new ********** ** *********** **** ********** *****, ** ****, ***** is **** ** ** each ** *******'* **** protection ****** *** *** EU's *** ***, *********** **** ********** **********. **************** ******* ** ****** comment ***** ********* *.

**** *** *** ******* binding, *** **** ***** weight ** ** **** protection *********** **** ***** to **** **** ******** on ***** ************ *****.

****** *** ****'* ********** for ********** **** ** Video *******

EDPB ***** ******* ** ****** *******

***** *** *********** ****** of *********** ****** ** be *********, *** **** recommends *********** * ***-***** approach. *** ***** ***** is *** **** ****, with *** ***** **** - **** ** ** example ***** ** *** EDPB:

image

**** ***** ***** ****** include *** *** ******, EDPB ******, **** **:

  • ******* ******
  • ******* ** **********
  • ******** ** **********
  • ****** ** **** *******
  • ******* ******* ** **** protection ******* (** ***)
  • ******* *** **** **** be **** ** * third *****
  • ***** ** **** *** second ***** ** ***********

Sign ****** ** ************ "****** ******** *** ********* ****"

*** **** **** ***** details ***** *** *********** of *** ***** ***** sign, ******* ******* **** the **** ** ** position *** ****:

** **** * *** that *** **** ******* can ****** ********* *** circumstances ** *** ************before ******** *** ********* ****". The sign should thus be "approximately at eye-level", near the actual zone being monitored, and presented in "an easily visible, intelligible and clearly ******** ******. [emphasis added]

*** *******, ** ***** 2019, ***** *** ****** **** ********* *** ****** ****** the ***** *** *** visible ***** ** ***** monitored:

'Second *****' *********** *******

*** ****** ***** *********** can ** ** *** form ** ** "****** accessible *****" ** *** cashier/other ******* ******** ** simply * ******. **** information "**** ******* *** other *********** **** ** mandatory ************ **** *** ****" (**** can ** ******* "********* decision-making, ********* *********" ** being **** - ****** ******** ****).

Storage: **** ************* ******** ****** ** *****

*** ****, **** *** GDPR, **** *** **** specific ******* ****** *********** but **** *** **** more ******** ** ******* that:

*** ****** *** ******* period ** ***(especially **** ****** ** *****), the more argumentation for the legitimacy of the purpose and the necessity of storage has to be provided. [emphasis added]

**** ***** **** * significant ****** (** *** guidelines *** *** *******), as **** ***-***** ***** video **** **** ** hours,***** ***** ** ** to * *****. *** ****, *******, states **** ** ***** storage ** ****** "**********" for ******** ******:

**********, *** *** ***** storing ***** ****** **** 72 *****, **** ***** mean **** ***** '****** layer' ****** ****** ******* a ***** ************* *** the ****** ******* - such ** ***** ** a ****-***** ****, ******* to ****** **** ****** requests, ***.

Data ********** ****** ********** ******** *** ***** ***** ********** ***

*** **** ****** **** any "***** *****" *** of ********** ********** ******** a ****:

********, ********* ** ******* 35 (*) (*) **** a **** ********** ****** assessment ** **** ******** when *** ********** ******* to ******* ******* ********** of **** ** * large *****.

*******, *** **** **** not **** ********* ***** what ** ***** ** 'large *****', *** ******* does *** ****, ***** defines ** ********* ****:

********** ***** *** ** process * ************ ****** of ******** **** ** regional, ******** ** ************* level *** ***** ***** affect * ***** ****** of **** ******** *** which *** ****** ** result ** * **** risk [...] ** *** rights *** ******** ** data ********

*******, *** **** ******** little ********** ******** *** DPIAs.

Biometrics: ******/**********/*** ********* *** ********** **********, *** *** ******** *********** **

*** ****'* ******* * states **** "********* **** for *** ******* ** uniquely *********** * ******* person" *********** **********, **** * *** important ********** **** ** consent ** '*********** ****** interest'.

*******, *** ****** ***** of ********* ***** ******/**********/*** analytics *** *** **** to **** *** **** as ****, ** *** EDPB ********** ***** **** such ************ *** *** considered **********, ** **** as *** ********* *** not **** ** ******** unique ******:

*******, *** *** *********** by ************ ******* ** retail *******, **** ** VIPs **** ********** ********* to ***** **********, *** store **** ****** ******* or ******* ******* * justification "***************** ** *** ******":

**** **** **** **** not **** **** *** Dahua, ******* ***** * **** complaint ********** ***** ****** *********** on ******** ** ***** without ********* *******. *** Dahua **** *** **** clearly *** **** **** of *****-**, ***-***** ***********, identifying ****** ** '********':

image

********* ** *** **** guidelines, **** * ****** means*********** ******** ********** **** provide *******. *** *** the ***** ****** ****** stuck ** **** **********/***/****** analytics, ** ***** ****** not ** ********** ********** at ***.

Facial ***********: ************ *** ******* ****** *** ******

*** *************** ** ****'* recent **** ********* ******* Dahua ** **** ******* the **** *** ** a ***** ****** ** its *****, ** *********** obtained '*******' **** * passerby ** **** ******:

image

*******, *** **** ********** do *** ******* **** this *********** '*******'. **** it ***** ** *******, the ********** *** ***** strict; **** * ******* 'passageway' **** ***** ******* might *** ** ********** 'consent' ****** ******* ********** ***********, **** ******:

image

***********, *** ************* *********** *** ******* *** much ******* **** * simple ****** **** ******* of *** **********, ******* information, ***, ** ***** displayed ** *****. *** conditions, ** ****** ** the ****, *******:

  • *** **** ******* ***** have *** ***** ** withdraw *** ** *** consent ** *** ****
  • Prior ** ****** *******, the data subject shall be informed thereof. [emphasis added]
  • ** ***** ** ** easy ** ******** ** to **** *******.

*******, **** ** ***** conditions *** ********** *** a ****** ****** **** the *** ***** *** in *** *****. * passerby *** ** *** to ** ******** ** the ****** *********** ***** on **********, *** *** withdrawing ******* ** ******.

******: **** **** *** apply ** ****** ***** facial *********** ***** *** enforcement *** ** ********** is *** ***** ** Article *'* ******* ************* in *** ****, *** a ******** **********, ****** *********** *********, ***** ******* ** gives ****** ******* ********.

Data ********/*************

*** **** ********** *** some ******* ** **** requests **** ** ***** to ******* ** *********** filmed ** ***** ************, stating **** ******** ***** to ** ******** (******** down ** * * hour **** ******), *** any ******* ******* ***** people ****** ** **********:

image

************* ** ******** ***** is * ****** ***** in ***** ************ - IPVM *** ****** *** software ********* (***** **** *****************).

No ******* ** ***** ** ********** ********

*** ********** ** *** give *** ******* ******* as ** **** **** of ********** ******** ***** to ** **** ** comply **** ****.

Certification *** *********

*********, *** **** ********** do *** ******* *** certification *******. **** ** likely ** **** ******* legally, **** ************** *** meaningless, *** *** **** itself ****** **** **** schemes ** *** "****** the **************" *** ********** in *** ***. *** more, **** *** ******** report,***** ******** *** *** GDPR *********, ** ******** Can **.

Other: ***** ******* *** ******* ** ****

**** ******** ******* **- **** *** **** even ***** ** ***** cameras? ***** *** **** regulates ******** ****, ***, by **********, ***** ******* do *** ******* ***, the ****** ** **, EDPB ******* ****** - although ***** ******** *********** may ***** ****:

image

Update ** ****

** **** ****** **** report **** ***** ********** are *********, ****** *** changes ** ******* ***** this ****.

Comments (12)

*****, *** *****'* *** concept ** *** "****** *** ****** ** the ***", *** ********* **** Dahua ********* * ***** you're ******** *** ******** on *** *** ******, and ******** *** ******.

*.*. ** * *** it, *********** *** *** ** not ** ******* ******** at * ***** ************ trade **** **** ***** involuntarily ******* ** **************** * ****** *********** system. * ******* *** intent ** ** ******* data-hoarding *** ******** ********* for *** ***** ******** of ******* ****** *** care ***** **** ****** as **** ** ***** their ***** *****. **** said, * ******* ***** could **** **** **** forthcoming *** *********** ***** their ****-********** (********* *** data ********* ** hours).

**, ** ***** ** that ***** ** ** breach ** *** ****** of *** ***, *** I ***** **** *** in ****** ** *** spirit.

** ********** ** **** the ******* ** **** is *** ** ***** users ** ***** ************ to *** ******* ** post ******* *** ******** opt-out ******* (*** ** you ** **** ** the ***** *******?).  *******, it ***** ** ** that ***** ** ***** surveillance **** ** ** reminded ** *** * sensible *** ********** ********* and **** ****** ******, and *** ** ** a ***** *** ***** massive ******* ** (**********) profiling ****.

* *** ** ** a (******** ******) ******* at ******* ****** *************** *** *** ***** subjected ** ******* *********, labeling *** ************** (*** the ***** ** **** data). * ****** ******* of *** ***** ** the******* *** ******* ******** data**** ** ******** ****** to *** ***.

*'* **** ** ***** more ***** *** ******* retention ****** * ***** would **** ** ***** video ************. **'* * hard ******* ******* *********** is ******** *** ******* within ** *******, *** fraud ** ****** ** detect *** ** ***** detected **** ***** *** incident. *** ****** *** also **** ** ******** in **** ********* ***** to **** **************.

*** ****** ** *** law ** *** ** protect ******** ** * video ************ ***** ****

**** *** *** *** say **** ** **** is ***** ******** *** give ******* ***** ***** it ** ** ** not **********. ***** ***, there ** ** ******* nor ***** ** ****** recognition (**** ******* **** **** **** and **** **** ** was *** ************** ** each ************ *** **** ********** were ******).

*********** *****.
**** ** *** **** on ******** ****** ******** UK ****** ** **** once **** ******** *** country?

** ****** **** **** to ***** *** **. They'll **** ***** ** signage ***** 😂

"******* ******* **** *** goal ** ** ******** the ****: … ** such * *** **** the **** ******* *** easily ********* *** ************* of *** ************before ******** *** ********* ****".

**** *** ********* ** for *** **** ** years ***** **** ***********, is **** **** **** owners *** **** ***** signage ** ***** ********. Often ***** *******, *********, view *** ******** ** their ********, ** *** visitor ** ******* ***** surveillance ****** **** *** feasibly **** *** ****.

***, ****** ** ***** solutions ** *** **********, and *** ****** ******* problems ****, *** ***** the ***** ***** ****? Mount ***** ******* *** down *** ****** ** someone ****'* ********? ******** not *******. **, **'** left **** *** ******* answer ***** ** ** make *** **** * feet **** ** **** it ** ******* **** the ******** ** ***** approach.

"***!", * **** *** cry, "**** ** **** suitable ********? ** * feet *** ******?" Might ** ** *** distance ****** ***** *** visitor ****** ** **********, thereby *********** ***** *********? If **, ****** *** sign ** ******* ** the ******** *** ***** the **** *** "*********" the *******? **** **, where *** ***** ******* 125 **/* ("*********** ** a ***** ******" ********* to *** *****-*). 

*'* *** ***** **** in *** **** ****, any ******** ********* *** satisfactorily ********* ** ** the ********* *************. *** does *** ***** ** a **** ****** ****, for ********, **** **** so *** ** ** achieve ***** "***********" (**.* px/m) **** ** **** through *** ***** ********** with ****? ****, ******* it ***** **** ** be "********* ******** ****". But, ** ********** (*** *****-* *****), **** ***** **** contain **** **** **% of *** ****** *********** required *** *********** ** a ******. (** *****, that's **** ** ***** expect * ***** ******* lawyer ** **** *** court **** **'* ****** to *** **** ***** evidence ******* *** ****** dismissed.) **, ** ******* this ************* ******* *** CCTV ***** *** *** lawyer's ****, *******'* **** low ********** ***** ** accepted ** *********** *** visitor's*********? *********, ** ******* required ** **** ****. *********>

**-**! (****** ** *** and ***** ** *** applause.)

******** *** ****** ** much **** ******. **'* a ****** ** ****** projection *** *******.

** *** ****** ** aimed ********* ***** ** no ***** ** *** area **** ** *** protected. **** ** **** privacy ******** ** *** camera ***** *** ** blur/block **** ** *** image.
*** *** **** ** the ******** *** ***** filming *****.

** ***** **** **** which ** ****, ** aids *** **** *********.

****** *** ****** **** to ******, ********.

* ******* **'** **** thinking ** ********* *********. If * ********** ***** correctly, **** * ***'* disagree. ****, *'** **** using ** *** ** model *** ************ **** fields-of-view ***** ****, ** very ********* ******** ******* and *****-**-***** ******************* *** *** * both **** **** ** time ** *** *****.

** ****** ******* *** the ******** ********, *** example, * ***** ***** whose ******** ** *********** adjacent ** ******* ******. ***'* ******* they **** **** ** oversee ***** ******** ******* they've ******** *********, ***-*******, etc. *** ******* ****, therefore, **** *** ****** on *** ****** ** have *** ****** **** of ***** ********. *** where ** *** ******* signage *******? ** ***** store *****? ** ****'* what **** **, (******* they **** ** ********* options ***** **** ** their *** ********) **** anyone ******** ***** ****** to **** *** **** will ******* ** ** the ***** ** **** and, *****, ******* **** their ******** **** ********. Unavoidably.

** *** ****, ** course, ******* ******** ** a ** ****** ****** the ******'* **********, ******** a ***** ** *** shape ** ** ****** tapering ******** ***** *** street. ****, ** ******** the ****** ** ******* interest, ** *****'* ******* the ******** ****** ** this ********.

**** ** ** ******** tongue-in-cheek ********: *-**** ***** that *** ** **** from ****** *** *******' view. *** ****'* *** a ********. **, **** the ******* ********* ******* go **** ** *** resolution ** *** ****** is ************ ***? ** my ********** ** *** UK **** ********** *********** for **** ****, **, owners **** ***** ****** signage, ******* *****-* ******* that **** *** *** sufficient ** ** *******. This ** * ******* inconsistency, *'*** ***? ********, how ** ***** ******* so **** *** *** already ** *** *****-**-****? As *****, ***** ** cannot ** *******.

**** ******** *** ***** for *** *****, * was ******** *************** ****** **** ****.

***** ** ***, ****** your **** **** ****** areas ** ***** ** the **. ** ******, a *********** ******* ** ** ** must **** * ******** *********** ** ***********,*** ******* *********** ********* ********. *******'* ***** **** **** **** was *** * ******* shop **** ****** ****** areas **** ******** ******* placed** *** ********.

** ** ***'** ** a ******* ***** *** GDPR , *** ******** shouldn't **** ******* ******* public ***** ** *** first *****. *** **** guide **** ** **** [emphasis *****]:

*******, *** **** ***** does ********* ***** *** be **** ***** ***** filming ****** ***** ** necessary. ** **** ****, using * **** ******** tool ** ***** ******* filter ** *********, *** EDPB ******:

** **** ********, ** order ** ** **** compliant, *** ************ ** ***** ***** having * **** **** that ****** *** ********, ******* if *** ******* ****** is ******* ********, **** of *** ********'* ******** data ** ***** *********. The ******** ************ ********** *** ********** of ******** ****. ****'* why ***** ******* *** not ********* ** *** GDPR, ** ** ********* earlier. ******** **** *** GDPR ******* ******** **** as ********* **** ***** you ** "** ************ ******* ******", ******* *** *** be ******** ********** **** it. * ******* *** stick ****** ****** ****** a ****** ** *** personal ****.

** ***** ** *** specific ** ***********, *** may **** ** ****** local **** *********** *****, but ** *** ** GDPR ********** ** *********, again, *** ***'* **** to ****** **** *** sign *********** **** ** you're *** ********** ******** data ** *** ***** place.

**** *****: *** ********* low ********** ** * stand ** *** * privacy ******. * ***** that's * ***** ********, since *****'* * ****** people *** ***** ** properly ********** **** ****-*** footage (********* *** ****** do *** *** ****). Best ** ***** ** a ******* ****** ** not ******* ****** ***** in *** ***** *****.

**** **** **** *****? Don't ******** ** *** have **** ********* ** concerns.

****'* *** ***** ******* are *** ********* ** the ****, ** ** mentioned *******...

***********, ** * ****** kit ** **** ******* recording ** *** **** of *** ********, *** then * *** ******* pointed ** *** ******, for ********* *****, ** ok?

  • ***** ******* *** *** regulated ** *** ****, period. ** ****** **** 'film' ****** ***** ** not * **** *********, correct. *** ***** *** be *******-******** *********** ***** that ** *** ****** refer ** **** *******'* Data ********** *********.
  • ** *** *** **** cameras, ** ******* **** you **** ** "*** **** ** *** property". ** **** ******** any ****** ***** **** a ********, *** **** to ** ******* *** consider ***** * ******* filter. *** **** ** you're ******* ** **** that's *** ******, *** need ** *** ** a **** ** ****** people **** *** **** is ***** ********* ****** they ***** **** ****.

** ******* *******. *'* a **** **** ** replying ***.

** ** ***'** ** a ******* ***** *** GDPR , *** ******** shouldn't **** ******* ******* public ***** ** *** first *****.

"********** ********" ****** **** surely ******** ******** ** your ********.

...*** **** ***** **** recognize ***** *** ** some ***** ***** ******* public ***** ** *********.

**** ** *** **** they **, ********* **** would ** ********** ******** of *** **** *****!

...***** * **** ******** tool ** ***** ******* filter ** *********...

******, *** ***** * store ******** ** *********** adjacent ** *** ****** sidewalk (** **** *** the ******** ****) **** completely ********** *** *******' purpose ******* *** ******* masks ***** **** * 2D *********************** ********** ** **** projected ** ******.

**** ** ***** ** a ******* ****** ** not ******* ****** ***** in *** ***** *****.

** ***** ****** * case ** * ******** need ***** ***** ************ is *** **** ****-********* way ** ******* ******* security *****, **** ******** limited ***** **** *** public ***** **** ** acceptable ** *** **** person. *** ***** ******* they **** *** ****** sense ** ******* **** personal ******* ** ****** a ********* *********** ** a ****** ******.

** *****, ****** *** following **!

**** *****:

"********** ********" ****** **** surely ******** ******** ** your ********.

********of **** ********, yes. But not public spaces, which are by definition not your property. That is why the EDPB recommends privacy filters, and why * ***** ******** ** Austria *** ******** ******* * ****** thoroughfare.

**** ***** *****:

*** ***** * ***** frontage ** *********** ******** to *** ****** ******** (as **** *** *** previous ****) **** ********** undermines *** *******' ******* because *** ******* ***** drawn **** * ** image****************** ********** ** **** projected ** ******.

* *** **** ******* from * ********* **********, however, * **** ********** Authority ** ******** ** accept **** ** ** excuse. *** **** **** not ******* *** **** of ********* ** ********** personal **** **** ******* it's *********** *** **** to ***** **.

*** **** *****:

******** ******* ***** **** the ****** ***** **** be ********** ** *** sane ******.

******** ******* ** ****** a ********* *********** ** a ****** ******.

***** *** ********-**** ***** that ****** *** **** Austrian ***** ******** ***********.** **** ** *** to *** **** * think ***** *** **** common ***** ** **** the ***** ***** ** be. ** ** ** inform ****'* ******* ***** GDPR **********.

******: *** ******** *** public ******** *** *** video ************ ****************** ** ********* *(* ********* ******** ********* 6, * ******* ****'* been *****). *** ** tells **** **** **** don't **** **** *** video ************ ********** **** be *********:

** **** *****, ** cannot *** **** ********* when *** ******* **** be *********. *** ************* will *** ** ******** by *** ******** ****** Subgroup *** *** ********** will ** ***** ***** necessary. ***** **** ******* is *********, *** ********** will ** ** *** adoption ** *** ********** plenary *******.

** **** **** ******** this *** ****** **** the ***** ********** *** issued.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

UK ICO Approves Unconsented Facial Recognition At Security Conferences on Feb 05, 2020
The UK's data protection agency has declined IPVM's GDPR complaint against Dahua for using face recognition without consent at IFSEC last year,...
France Declares School Facial Recognition Illegal Due to GDPR on Oct 31, 2019
France is the latest European country to effectively prohibit facial recognition as a school access control solution, even with the consent of...
UK Facewatch GDPR Compliance Questioned on Aug 27, 2019
Even as the GDPR strictly regulates biometrics, a UK company called Facewatch is selling anti-shoplifter facial recognition systems to hundreds of...
First GDPR Facial Recognition Fine For Sweden School on Aug 22, 2019
A school in Sweden has been fined $20,000 for using facial recognition to keep attendance in what is Sweden's first GDPR fine. Notably, the fine is...
First Video Surveillance GDPR Fine In France on Jul 08, 2019
The French government has imposed a sizeable fine on a small business for violating the GDPR after it constantly filmed employees without informing...
GDPR / ICO Complaint Filed Against Dahua on Jun 27, 2019
IPVM has filed a GDPR complaint against Dahua UK's facial recognition conducted at their booth during this year's IFSEC show. In this post, we...
Nortek and SDS Fight Over Failed Settlement on Jun 05, 2019
Distributor SDS said they reached a deal with Nortek but Nortek says no settlement was reached and the suit is still on. In this post, based on...
San Francisco Face Recognition Ban And Surveillance Regulation Details Examined on May 14, 2019
San Francisco passed the legislation 8-1 today. While the face recognition 'ban' has already received significant attention over the past few...
ADT's Top Dealer "The Defenders" Sued 20+ Times on May 07, 2019
ADT's largest authorized dealer, The Defenders, has been sued more than 20 times since 2012, IPVM has verified through analyzing legal...
UK Camera Commissioner Calls for Regulating Facial Recognition on Apr 15, 2019
IPVM interviewed Tony Porter, the UK’s surveillance camera commissioner after he recently called for regulations on facial recognition in the...

Most Recent Industry Reports

GeoVision Presents AI and Facial Recognition on May 22, 2020
GeoVision presented its AI analytics and facial recognition at the April 2020 IPVM New Products show. Inside this report: A 30-minute video...
Density Presents Occupancy Monitoring For Coronavirus Protection on May 22, 2020
Density presented its cloud-based occupancy sensor to deal with Coronavirus at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. Inside this report: A...
Openpath Presents Two Door PoE Controller on May 21, 2020
Openpath presented its new PoE controller at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. Inside this report: A 30-minute video from Openpath including...
Bosch Presents MIC 7100 Extreme PTZs on May 21, 2020
Bosch presented its MIC 7100 Extreme PTZs at the April 2020 IPVM New Products show. Inside this report: A 30-minute video from Bosch...
Hikvision Chairman Targeted For Sanctions As Federal Watchdog Calls Out Hikvision "Serious Religious Freedom Violations" on May 21, 2020
The US government's religious freedom watchdog has criticized Hikvision for being "credibly implicated in serious religious freedom violations"....
Hikvision Temperature Screening Tested on May 20, 2020
Hikvision has ramped up the promotion of its 'temperature screening' system, including their salespeople arguing for no blackbody needed. But how...
Axxon Presents VMS 4.4 and AI Behavior Analytics on May 20, 2020
AxxonSoft presented its VMS 4.4 and AI behavior analytics at the April 2020 IPVM New Products show. Inside this report: A 30-minute video...
Indoor Robotics Presents Tando Aerial Drones on May 20, 2020
Indoor Robotics presented Tando indoor autonomous drones at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. Inside this report: A 30-minute video from...
Directory of 89 Video Surveillance Startups on May 20, 2020
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly...
FLIR Cancelling Contract With X.Labs / Feevr on May 20, 2020
While X.Labs announced the signing of a new agreement with FLIR on May 12, 2020, FLIR said, in response, on May 18, 2020, that they had cancelled a...