First Video Surveillance GDPR Fine In France

By: Charles Rollet, Published on Jul 08, 2019

The French government has imposed a sizeable fine on a small business for violating the GDPR after it constantly filmed employees without informing them and kept poor encryption practices. It marks the first ever GDPR video surveillance fine ever issued by the CNIL, France’s data protection agency, it has confirmed to IPVM.

first gdpr fine in france

In this post, we examine the case and what it means for GDPR compliance going forward, including:

  • France Video Surveillance Regulations Context
  • Company Background
  • CNIL Allegations
  • What GDPR Articles Were Violated
  • How the Fine Was Calculated
  • Broader Impact/Conclusion

For background, see our GDPR For Video Surveillance Guide.

Ultimately, the case shows the importance of GDPR compliance and working closely with data authorities to address issues. However, the evidence we found shows no stepped up GDPR violation enforcement for video surveillance.

*** ****** ********** *** imposed * ******** **** on * ***** ******** for ********* *** **** after ** ********** ****** employees ******* ********* **** and **** **** ********** practices. ** ***** *** first **** **** ***** surveillance **** **** ****** by *******, ******’* **** ********** agency, ** *** ********* to ****.

first gdpr fine in france

** **** ****, ** examine *** **** *** what ** ***** *** GDPR ********** ***** *******, including:

  • ****** ***** ************ *********** Context
  • ******* **********
  • **** ***********
  • **** **** ******** **** Violated
  • *** *** **** *** Calculated
  • ******* ******/**********

*** **********, *** ******* *** ***** ************ Guide.

**********, *** **** ***** the ********** ** **** compliance *** ******* ******* with **** *********** ** address ******. *******, *** evidence ** ***** ***** no ******* ** **** violation *********** *** ***** surveillance.

[***************]

Context: ******* ****** ***********

** ******, ***** ************************** ******* **** *********, and **** *** *** case ********** *** ****. *** *******, ******* individuals****** ******* ******* **** film ****** ********, **** * ******** in ***** ** ***** own *****. ** *** workplace, ******** ************ ** employees ** ********** - see **** ******* ****** by ******* ** *******:

***********:***, *** *** ******* security ******* ** *** [office] ******* *** ******** purposes.**, ** ** ********* to ******* ********* ** this *******.

Enforcement ***

*******, ****** *********** ** video ************ *********** ** low, *** **** *** not ******* ***** *** GDPR *** ******. ** 2017, **** *** ******* in *** ***** ******* was ***** *** ***** surveillance ********** ***** ** employee ********** ** * camera ******* *** ****; the **** *** *,*** euros ($*,***). *** * single ******* *** ***** in ****, *** **** the **** *** ******. From**********, *** ****** ** CNIL ***** ************ ******* investigations **** ******** **** 47 ** **, *** annual ******* ****.

************, **** ***** ************ investigations *** ********* ***** on **********, * ****** of**** *******************, ***** ***** *** CNIL ** *** *********** inspecting *** *** *****, integrators, ** ****** *** possible **********.

Company **********

*** ******* **** *** fined ** ***************, * *********** **** based ** ***** **** only * *********. *** revenue ** **** *** about $* ******* *** it **** ****** ** over $***,***, *** ******** ***********.

CNIL ***********

*** **** ********* **** it ***** *** ************* based ** ******** ********** about *********’* ************ ******: a ***** ** *, starting *** *** *** back ** ****. ** sent ******* ******* ** Uniontrad *** ******** ** response.

****’* ***** ****** ********** took ***** ** ******** 2018, *******:

* ****** ****** *** desks *** * ******… employees **** ***** ******** notified

******* *** ****** *** longer **** ******* ******

******** ** ***** ** access ******* *********** *** [email] ******* *** *** ensure **** ******** *** confidentiality (********'* ********* *** not ******* ********* *** employees ****** * ****** email *******)

** ****, *** **** gave ********* *** ****** to *** *** ***** issues. ** *********, ********* claimed ** * ****** that ** *** ********* them, *** * ****** CNIL ********** * ***** later ***** ****:

*** ****** ******* ********* has **** ***** ** constantly *** ******* ************ since *** ******* ********** in ********

** *********** *** **** relayed ** *** ********* about *** ***** ************, which ****** ************ **** the ******* ** *** processing, ******** ** *******, and ****** ********** *** data

*** * ****** ******** policy *** **** *** in ***** *** *** employee's ********* *** ** measures **** **** ***** to ****** ************ ** [who ** *****] *** email *****

***** *** ****** **********, Uniontrad ******* ** *** complied **** *** *** by ******* ******* **** on *** ******** ******, putting ** * ****, and ************ ******** ********. However, *** **** ********** that *** ****** *** still ******* *** ******** desk.

**********, *** **** ****** that ******* ********* *** not ****** ********* ****** the *** ***** ****** in ****, *** *** ignored ************** ***** ** that, * *********/****** ******* would *****.

What **** ******** **** ********

************, *** **** ****** that **** **** ******** were ******** ** *********:

******* *, **:******** **** ***** ** adequate, ******** *** ******* to **** ** ********* in ******** ** *** purposes *** ***** **** are ********* (‘**** ************’). **** ******* ******** to *** ******** ***** surveillance ** *********'* *********. French ******* **** (**** pre-GDPR) ** *** ****** this, ****** *** **** the **** ***** "*********** circumstances", **** ** ****** sensitive ************, *** * translation ******* **** *** qualify, *** **** ******. For **** ***** ****** laws ** ********** ********** employees, *******'* ************ *** **** *********** a $*.* ******* **** on * ****** *** "excessive ***** ************."

******* **:*********** ***********, ************* *** modalities *** *** ******** of *** ****** ** the **** *******". *.*. ********* *** not *********** ** *** employees ***** *** ***** surveillance ****** *****.

******* **:*********** ** ** ******** where ******** **** *** collected **** *** **** subject.******* ** ******* **. Uniontrad *** *** *** up * ******* ******* sign ********* ********* ** the **** ********** ****** place, *** ****** ** contacted *** **** *******, storage ********, ***. *** IPVM's**** *** ***** ************ Guide*** **** ***** **** kind ** *********** ****** be *** ** ** such *****.

******* **:******** ** **********: *** processor ***** ********* *********** technical *** ************** ******** to ****** * ***** of ******** *********** ** the ****. **** ****** ** Uniontrad's **** ** ********* on ******* *********, ***** CNIL ****** "*** *** ensure *** ******** ** personal ****".

How *** **** *** **********

***** *******'* ******* **,* ******* **** ** 20 ******* ***** ($**.* million) ** *% ** global ****** ******* ** permitted, ********* ** ******. Fines **** ** "effective, *************, *** **********".

*** **** ********* ********** a **** ** **,*** euros ($**,***). ****** **********'* ***** ***** ************ GDPR ****,*** **** *** *** offer * ********* ** how **** **** ********* cost. *** **** ****** was ******* ********** ** the ******** ********** ***** Uniontrad ***** **** *** its ******* ** **** with **** ************* ** fix *** ******, **** the **** *******:

*** ******* - ******** to **** ** ****** - ***** ******** ************ with *** **** ***** the ****** ******* *** already ***** ***.

*******, ********* **** **** a **** *** "****************" under ******* ** *** to *** *******'* **** financial *********. *** **** agreed *** ******* ** fine ********* **,*** ***** (about $**,***). **** ** the ********** *** *** the **** ** ** made ****** - **** is *** * *** practice, ** *** ** seen **** **** **** of******** **** *****.

Broader **** ************

*** ********* **** ********* the ********** ** **** compliance. **,*** ***** *** a *****, *****-****** ******* is * *** *** and ** *** ******* video ************ **** *** CNIL *** ****** ***** at ***** ****, ********* to ********* ******** ** *********.

*** **** **** ** GDPR ********** **** ********* was ******* ** ***** how *** *** *** given **** ********** *********** a *** *** **** sophisticated ******* ** ****** against *********; ***** ** the ****, ***** ************ violations **** ******* ****** against******'* ***** **** ** law *** ******** *******.

*******, *** ****'* ******* should *** ** *****. Enforcement ** *** **** stringent. ** ********* *******, zero ***** ************ ***** were **** *** **** the **** ******, *** the ****** ** ***** surveillance ************** ******** ************* (47 ** **) **** 2017 ** ****.

**** ***** *** **** directly ** ** *** stepping ** *** *********** of ***** ************ *********** due ** *** ****. They **** ** - the **** ****** ****** by *** **** (** enforcement *****) ** *** maximum ********* **** ***** raised ** ** ******* euros ** *% ** global ****** ******* - admittedly * *** ******, but ********** *** ******* players, ********** ***** *** GDPR ****** ******** **** fines ** "*************".

Comments (15)

****. * **** **** asked **** ***** ****** how ****** ** ** that *** ** ** Canada ****** ********* ******* to ****. ** ** opinion ***** *** ******* administration, **** ** ********. However, ****** *** *** shift ******** ****** *** left ** *** **** few ***** ** ** a ***********.

******* ******** **** *** come ** **** * do *** **** ** answer *** - ** EU ********* ***** * corporate ************ ** *** US **** **** ***** to **** ** ********?

** **** **** * way ** ********** **** ************** ** will ********** **** * use **** ** *** US.

** ************* ** **** is **** ** ******* to ** ******** ******** they ***. *******, **** can **** ****** * fine ** * ***-** company ** **** **** operate ** *** **.

*** ****** ***** **** bigger ********* *** ******** privacy ********** **** *** broadly ** **** **** GDPR ********** ** **** is ******* ** *** US.

****

*******, **** *** **** impose * **** ** a ***-** ******* ** they **** ******* ** the **.

**** ****** ****** **** right ****.

******* *** ********* ******* and ********** ******* ****** possible ** **** ***** fine, *** *******, * Japanese ******* ***** ******** in ***** ;)

******* ******** **** *** come ** **** * do *** **** ** answer *** - ** EU ********* ***** * corporate ************ ** *** US **** **** ***** to **** ** ********?

***** **** *** **** under *** ***** ****? An ******** ********* ** an ** ****** ***** have **** *****, *** not *** ***** *** around ** **'* * European ***.

** ***** ****'* *** I ********** **. ********* I, * ********, ****** be **** ** ***** pot ** *** ******* I ****, ***** **'* legal ** ******.

** ********, **** ** a **** ******** **** comes ** *****. ** I **** ** ****** with *** **** *** every ** *******/********, ** matter ***** **** ***? If ** ***** ****** in *** **** **** has * ******** ****** that ****** * ******* tourist, **** **** ******* now **** *** ***** to ****** * **** complaint?

*** ****** ****. *** **** **** not ******* "** ********" or "** *********" ********. The **** "******* ** *** ********** of ******** **** ** data ********who *** ** *** ***** [emphasis added]", according to ******* * ('*********** *****'). ** **** ***** people - ********** ** citizenship ** ********* - within *** ** *** protected ** *** ****. If **** ***** *** Union, **** *** ***.

** * ******* *** stand *** **** ** the ***** *** ***'* see ** *** *****, can't *** *** **********. With * ********* * would ******* ********* **** must **** **** ***** on **** **** * vendetta ** **** ****.

***** **** **** *** is *** ***** *** not **** ********** **. Leaving ** *****. *** employees ***** **'* ******* and *** **** *** happy.

**** ****** ****, *** law **** ****** ***** for *** ******** ****** in ******, ** *** data ********** ******** ** information, ** **** *** CNIL *** ******* ** 1978 **** *** ******* of ********** ********* **** and ********* *** *** about **** **********, ********** public ******* *** ** forth...

******, ** ****** * lot ** ******* *** thinking ** **** ** a **** ** ** the ******** **** *** (ie: "*** ************ ** libertées" ***** ********* ** "law ** *********** ************ and *******") , **** more ******** *** ****.

** **** ****, **** if *** ****** **** physically ******* *** *** working *** ******* ***** have ** **** ***** personnel **** *** ****** is ******* ** *** if **** ******* *** information **** **** ***** would **** *** ***** to ******* *** **** for * **** ***** on *****.

** **** ****, **** if *** ****** **** physically ******* *** *** working *** ******* ***** have ** **** ***** personnel **** *** ****** is ******* ** *** if **** ******* *** information **** **** ***** would **** *** ***** to ******* *** **** for * **** ***** on *****.

** *** **** ***** to ***** *******?

***.

**** **** *** ***** to ***** ******, *** in ********** ************ *** local *** ***** (********* the ********* *** *** right ** **** ** he's ***** ******* ** no.

** ** **** ********** setting *** ********** ** a ***** ****** ** make *** ********* ***** they *** ***** ************ is ***** ** *.

*************** ** ******* ****** GDPR *********?

(*** *** ********, ***** is * **** *********, but **** *** *****).

* **** * *** of *** ******** ** this ***** *** ***** not **** *** **** this *****. *** ***?

**. * ***** ***** it’s * ******* ***** by ******* *** ********* the *********** *** ********, and **** ****** ** anonymously ******* **** **** it *** ****** ******* to *******.

********: **** **** ***** to *** ******* ** a ****** ******, ****** a ***** *****?

*** **** ** ******** data ***** ********* ****** the ** ***** ***** the ****. ** ***, the **** '*******' ** a ***** ***** ** a ******, ** **** as **** ****** ** identifiable *** ** ** the **. *******, **** doesn't **** *** ***** of *** *********** ** somehow ****** ** *** GDPR. *** **** ** very *******-******, ********** ****** * ****** ** situations ***** ********** ** permitted, *********:

********** **necessary *** *** ******** ** *** ********** ********* ******* ** *** ********** or by a third party, except where such interests are overridden by the interests or fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject which require protection of personal data, in particular where the data subject is a child. [emphasis added]

** *** ******** *** becomes ******* *** "*********** rights *** ********" ** the **** ******* ********* the "********** ********" ** taking *** *****, *.*. showcasing ********.

**** ** * **** a ***** ****** **** any ******** ********* *** legality ** *** ***********'* photo ***** ** ******** not ** ************ *** GDPR *** ** ********* to ******'* ******** ******* laws. ****** ******* ******** ********* ********** ****** ** someone ******* ***** *******. For *******, ***** *** Paris ******* **** ******** of ****, * *** pictured ******* *** **************** *************** *** **** the *******, ****** ****** privacy ****; *** **** was*********, ** *** ***** was ********** **** ** legitimate *************.

** *********, *** ***** case **** ** *** grandmaster (** ** ****) would **** ****** **** on *************** ** ******** French ******* **** - which ******* ********* ***** types ** ********** - rather **** *** **** itself.

*******, **** *******!

** ***** **** *** American ***********, * ***** the ******** / ******* would ** ******* ** a ****** ** * bathroom *****, ** ***, where ** ** *********, at *****, ********* ** be *** ******. *** example, *** **** *** in **** ******** *** what **** *** **** camera ********? * ** not **** **** **** come **** **** ** this ****, **** *** admission ** ********, *** it ** * ****** stunning ****** ** *** up * ****** ** someone ****** * ******** stall.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

HD Analog vs IP Guide on Jul 16, 2019
For years, HD resolution and single cable signal/power were IP camera advantages, with analog cameras limited to much lower resolution and...
Lens Focal Length Tutorial on Jul 10, 2019
3mm, 6mm, 2.8 - 9mm, 5 - 50mm, etc. Camera specifications often list lens lengths but what do they mean? These metrics are important in...
Poor OSDP Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 09, 2019
OSDP certainly offers advantages over decades-old Wiegand (see our OSDP Access Control Guide) but new IPVM statistics show that usage of OSDP, even...
RaySharp Revealed - Major China OEM For Western Consumer Video Surveillance on Jul 02, 2019
RaySharp is mostly unknown, even among people in the video surveillance industry, though it is a major supplier of OEM surveillance equipment such...
2019 Mid-Year Video Surveillance Guide on Jul 01, 2019
IPVM's new 400+ page Mid-Year Industry Guide brings all of these issues and events together in a single resource to read and review. It can be...
GDPR / ICO Complaint Filed Against Dahua on Jun 27, 2019
IPVM has filed a GDPR complaint against Dahua UK's facial recognition conducted at their booth during this year's IFSEC show.  In this post, we...
Axis Live Privacy Shield Analytics Tested on Jun 25, 2019
Privacy is becoming a bigger factor in video surveillance, driven both by increased public awareness and by GDPR. Now, Axis has released Live...
IFSEC 2019 Show Report on Jun 19, 2019
The UK's largest trade show, IFSEC, is underway and IPVM has been examining what is new and happening at the show. Inside, we cover: Huawei...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 17, 2019
While face and fingerprint recognition are used regularly for smartphones, it is not as common in physical security. In this note, we examine...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Mobile Access Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 18, 2019
The ability to use mobile phones as access credentials is one of the biggest trends in a market that historically has been slow in adopting new...
New GDPR Guidelines for Video Surveillance Examined on Jul 18, 2019
The highest-level EU data protection authority has issued a new series of provisional video surveillance guidelines. While GDPR has been in...
Anyvision Aims For 2022 Revenue of $1 Billion on Jul 17, 2019
Only 3 video surveillance manufacturers do a billion dollars or more in annual revenue - Hikvision, Dahua, and Axis. Now, Anyvision plans to join...
HD Analog vs IP Guide on Jul 16, 2019
For years, HD resolution and single cable signal/power were IP camera advantages, with analog cameras limited to much lower resolution and...
How To Troubleshoot Wiegand Reader Problems - Inverted Wiring on Jul 16, 2019
Wiegand is the dominant method of connecting access readers, but problems can arise for installers. In fact, one of the most difficult reader...
ZeroEyes Gun Detection Startup on Jul 16, 2019
A gun detection video analytics startup, ZeroEyes, is being led by a group of 6 former Navy SEALs, aiming to "save lives" by using AI to assist...
Motorola Acquires Watchguard, Adds to Vigilant And Avigilon on Jul 15, 2019
2 years ago, Motorola had no position nor relevancy to video surveillance. Now, they own major video surveillance, LPR and body camera providers...
Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Jul 15, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...
Vivotek Trend Micro Cyber Security Camera App Tested on Jul 15, 2019
Vivotek and Trend Micro are claiming five million blocked attacks on IP cameras, with their jointly developed app for Vivotek cameras. This new...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact