First Video Surveillance GDPR Fine In France

By Charles Rollet, Published Jul 08, 2019, 09:12am EDT

The French government has imposed a sizeable fine on a small business for violating the GDPR after it constantly filmed employees without informing them and kept poor encryption practices. It marks the first ever GDPR video surveillance fine ever issued by the CNIL, France’s data protection agency, it has confirmed to IPVM.

first gdpr fine in france

In this post, we examine the case and what it means for GDPR compliance going forward, including:

  • France Video Surveillance Regulations Context
  • Company Background
  • CNIL Allegations
  • What GDPR Articles Were Violated
  • How the Fine Was Calculated
  • Broader Impact/Conclusion

For background, see our GDPR For Video Surveillance Guide.

Ultimately, the case shows the importance of GDPR compliance and working closely with data authorities to address issues. However, the evidence we found shows no stepped up GDPR violation enforcement for video surveillance.

Context: ******* ****** ***********

** ******, ***** ************************** ******* **** *********, and **** *** *** case ********** *** ****. *** *******, ******* individuals****** ******* ******* **** film ****** ********, **** * ******** in ***** ** ***** own *****. ** *** workplace, ******** ************ ** employees ** ********** - see **** ******* ****** by ******* ** *******:

***********:***, *** *** ******* security ******* ** *** [office] ******* *** ******** purposes.**, ** ** ********* to ******* ********* ** this *******.

Enforcement ***

*******, ****** *********** ** video ************ *********** ** low, *** **** *** not ******* ***** *** GDPR *** ******. ** 2017, **** *** ******* in *** ***** ******* was ***** *** ***** surveillance ********** ***** ** employee ********** ** * camera ******* *** ****; the **** *** *,*** euros ($*,***). *** * single ******* *** ***** in ****, *** **** the **** *** ******. From**********, *** ****** ** CNIL ***** ************ ******* investigations **** ******** **** 47 ** **, *** annual ******* ****.

************, **** ***** ************ investigations *** ********* ***** on **********, * ****** of**** *******************, ***** ***** *** CNIL ** *** *********** inspecting *** *** *****, integrators, ** ****** *** possible **********.

Company **********

*** ******* **** *** fined ** ***************, * *********** **** based ** ***** **** only * *********. *** revenue ** **** *** about $* ******* *** it **** ****** ** over $***,***, *** ******** ***********.

CNIL ***********

*** **** ********* **** it ***** *** ************* based ** ******** ********** about *********’* ************ ******: a ***** ** *, starting *** *** *** back ** ****. ** sent ******* ******* ** Uniontrad *** ******** ** response.

****’* ***** ****** ********** took ***** ** ******** 2018, *******:

* ****** ****** *** desks *** * ******… employees **** ***** ******** notified

******* *** ****** *** longer **** ******* ******

******** ** ***** ** access ******* *********** *** [email] ******* *** *** ensure **** ******** *** confidentiality (********'* ********* *** not ******* ********* *** employees ****** * ****** email *******)

** ****, *** **** gave ********* *** ****** to *** *** ***** issues. ** *********, ********* claimed ** * ****** that ** *** ********* them, *** * ****** CNIL ********** * ***** later ***** ****:

*** ****** ******* ********* has **** ***** ** constantly *** ******* ************ since *** ******* ********** in ********

** *********** *** **** relayed ** *** ********* about *** ***** ************, which ****** ************ **** the ******* ** *** processing, ******** ** *******, and ****** ********** *** data

*** * ****** ******** policy *** **** *** in ***** *** *** employee's ********* *** ** measures **** **** ***** to ****** ************ ** [who ** *****] *** email *****

***** *** ****** **********, Uniontrad ******* ** *** complied **** *** *** by ******* ******* **** on *** ******** ******, putting ** * ****, and ************ ******** ********. However, *** **** ********** that *** ****** *** still ******* *** ******** desk.

**********, *** **** ****** that ******* ********* *** not ****** ********* ****** the *** ***** ****** in ****, *** *** ignored ************** ***** ** that, * *********/****** ******* would *****.

What **** ******** **** ********

************, *** **** ****** that **** **** ******** were ******** ** *********:

******* *, **:******** **** ***** ** adequate, ******** *** ******* to **** ** ********* in ******** ** *** purposes *** ***** **** are ********* (‘**** ************’). **** ******* ******** to *** ******** ***** surveillance ** *********'* *********. French ******* **** (**** pre-GDPR) ** *** ****** this, ****** *** **** the **** ***** "*********** circumstances", **** ** ****** sensitive ************, *** * translation ******* **** *** qualify, *** **** ******. For **** ***** ****** laws ** ********** ********** employees, *******'* ************ *** **** *********** a $*.* ******* **** on * ****** *** "excessive ***** ************."

******* **:*********** ***********, ************* *** modalities *** *** ******** of *** ****** ** the **** *******". *.*. ********* *** not *********** ** *** employees ***** *** ***** surveillance ****** *****.

******* **:*********** ** ** ******** where ******** **** *** collected **** *** **** subject.******* ** ******* **. Uniontrad *** *** *** up * ******* ******* sign ********* ********* ** the **** ********** ****** place, *** ****** ** contacted *** **** *******, storage ********, ***. *** IPVM's**** *** ***** ************ Guide*** **** ***** **** kind ** *********** ****** be *** ** ** such *****.

******* **:******** ** **********: *** processor ***** ********* *********** technical *** ************** ******** to ****** * ***** of ******** *********** ** the ****. **** ****** ** Uniontrad's **** ** ********* on ******* *********, ***** CNIL ****** "*** *** ensure *** ******** ** personal ****".

How *** **** *** **********

***** *******'* ******* **,* ******* **** ** 20 ******* ***** ($**.* million) ** *% ** global ****** ******* ** permitted, ********* ** ******. Fines **** ** "effective, *************, *** **********".

*** **** ********* ********** a **** ** **,*** euros ($**,***). ****** **********'* ***** ***** ************ GDPR ****,*** **** *** *** offer * ********* ** how **** **** ********* cost. *** **** ****** was ******* ********** ** the ******** ********** ***** Uniontrad ***** **** *** its ******* ** **** with **** ************* ** fix *** ******, **** the **** *******:

*** ******* - ******** to **** ** ****** - ***** ******** ************ with *** **** ***** the ****** ******* *** already ***** ***.

*******, ********* **** **** a **** *** "****************" under ******* ** *** to *** *******'* **** financial *********. *** **** agreed *** ******* ** fine ********* **,*** ***** (about $**,***). **** ** the ********** *** *** the **** ** ** made ****** - **** is *** * *** practice, ** *** ** seen **** **** **** of******** **** *****.

Broader **** ************

*** ********* **** ********* the ********** ** **** compliance. **,*** ***** *** a *****, *****-****** ******* is * *** *** and ** *** ******* video ************ **** *** CNIL *** ****** ***** at ***** ****, ********* to ********* ******** ** *********.

*** **** **** ** GDPR ********** **** ********* was ******* ** ***** how *** *** *** given **** ********** *********** a *** *** **** sophisticated ******* ** ****** against *********; ***** ** the ****, ***** ************ violations **** ******* ****** against******'* ***** **** ** law *** ******** *******.

*******, *** ****'* ******* should *** ** *****. Enforcement ** *** **** stringent. ** ********* *******, zero ***** ************ ***** were **** *** **** the **** ******, *** the ****** ** ***** surveillance ************** ******** ************* (47 ** **) **** 2017 ** ****.

**** ***** *** **** directly ** ** *** stepping ** *** *********** of ***** ************ *********** due ** *** ****. They **** ** - the **** ****** ****** by *** **** (** enforcement *****) ** *** maximum ********* **** ***** raised ** ** ******* euros ** *% ** global ****** ******* - admittedly * *** ******, but ********** *** ******* players, ********** ***** *** GDPR ****** ******** **** fines ** "*************".

Comments (15)

****.  * **** **** asked **** ***** ****** how ****** ** ** that *** ** ** Canada ****** ********* ******* to ****.  ** ** opinion ***** *** ******* administration, **** ** ********.  However, ****** *** *** shift ******** ****** *** left ** *** **** few ***** ** ** a ***********.

******* ******** **** *** come ** **** * do *** **** ** answer *** - ** EU ********* ***** * corporate ************ ** *** US **** **** ***** to **** ** ********?

** **** **** * way ** ********** **** ************** ** will ********** **** * use **** ** *** US.

** ************* ** **** is **** ** ******* to ** ******** ******** they ***. *******, **** can **** ****** * fine ** * ***-** company ** **** **** operate ** *** **.

*** ****** ***** **** bigger ********* *** ******** privacy ********** **** *** broadly ** **** **** GDPR ********** ** **** is ******* ** *** US.

****

*******, **** *** **** impose * **** ** a ***-** ******* ** they **** ******* ** the **.

**** ****** ****** **** right ****.  

******* *** ********* ******* and ********** ******* ****** possible ** **** ***** fine, *** *******, * Japanese ******* ***** ******** in ***** ;)

******* ******** **** *** come ** **** * do *** **** ** answer *** - ** EU ********* ***** * corporate ************ ** *** US **** **** ***** to **** ** ********?

***** **** *** **** under *** ***** ****? An ******** ********* ** an ** ****** ***** have **** *****, *** not *** ***** *** around ** **'* * European ***.

** ***** ****'* *** I ********** **. ********* I, * ********, ****** be **** ** ***** pot ** *** ******* I ****, ***** **'* legal ** ******.

** ********, **** ** a **** ******** **** comes ** *****. ** I **** ** ****** with *** **** *** every ** *******/********, ** matter ***** **** ***? If ** ***** ****** in *** **** **** has * ******** ****** that ****** * ******* tourist, **** **** ******* now **** *** ***** to ****** * **** complaint?

*** ****** ** **. *** **** **** not ******* "** ********" or "** *********" ********. The **** "******* ** *** ********** of ******** **** ** data ********who *** ** *** ***** [emphasis added]", according to ******* * ('*********** *****'). ** **** ***** people - ********** ** citizenship ** ********* - within *** ** *** protected ** *** ****. If **** ***** *** Union, **** *** ***.

 

** * ******* *** stand *** **** ** the ***** *** ***'* see ** *** *****, can't *** *** **********. With * ********* * would ******* ********* **** must **** **** ***** on **** **** * vendetta ** **** ****.

***** **** **** *** is *** ***** *** not **** ********** **. Leaving ** *****. *** employees ***** **'* ******* and *** **** *** happy.

 

**** ****** ****, *** law **** ****** ***** for *** ******** ****** in ******, ** *** data ********** ******** ** information, ** **** *** CNIL *** ******* ** 1978 **** *** ******* of ********** ********* **** and ********* *** *** about **** **********, ********** public ******* *** ** forth...

******, ** ****** * lot ** ******* *** thinking ** **** ** a **** ** ** the ******** **** ***  (ie: "***  ************ ** libertées" ***** ********* ** "law ** *********** ************ and *******") , **** more ******** *** ****. 

 

** **** ****, **** if *** ****** **** physically ******* *** *** working *** ******* ***** have ** **** ***** personnel **** *** ****** is ******* ** *** if **** ******* *** information **** **** ***** would **** *** ***** to ******* *** **** for * **** ***** on *****. 

 

** **** ****, **** if *** ****** **** physically ******* *** *** working *** ******* ***** have ** **** ***** personnel **** *** ****** is ******* ** *** if **** ******* *** information **** **** ***** would **** *** ***** to ******* *** **** for * **** ***** on *****.

** *** **** ***** to ***** *******? 

***.

**** **** *** ***** to ***** ******, *** in ********** ************ *** local *** ***** (********* the  ********* *** *** right ** **** ** he's ***** ******* ** no.

** ** **** ********** setting *** ********** ** a ***** ****** ** make *** ********* ***** they *** ***** ************ is ***** ** *.

 

 

*************** ** ******* ****** GDPR *********?

(*** *** ********, ***** is * **** *********, but **** *** *****).

* **** * *** of *** ******** ** this ***** *** ***** not **** *** **** this *****. *** ***?

**.  * ***** ***** it’s * ******* ***** by ******* *** ********* the *********** *** ********, and **** ****** ** anonymously ******* **** **** it *** ****** ******* to *******.

********: **** **** ***** to *** ******* ** a ****** ******, ****** a ***** *****?

*** **** ** ******** data ***** ********* ****** the ** ***** ***** the ****. ** ***, the **** '*******' ** a ***** ***** ** a ******, ** **** as **** ****** ** identifiable *** ** ** the **. *******, **** doesn't **** *** ***** of *** *********** ** somehow ****** ** *** GDPR. *** **** ** very *******-******, ********** ****** * ****** ** situations ***** ********** ** permitted, *********:

********** **necessary *** *** ******** ** *** ********** ********* ******* ** *** ********** or by a third party, except where such interests are overridden by the interests or fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject which require protection of personal data, in particular where the data subject is a child. [emphasis added]

** *** ******** *** becomes ******* *** "*********** rights *** ********" ** the **** ******* ********* the "********** ********" ** taking *** *****, *.*. ********** cheating.

**** ** * **** a ***** ****** **** any ******** ********* *** legality ** *** ***********'* photo ***** ** ******** not ** ************ *** GDPR *** ** ********* to ******'* ******** ******* laws. ****** ******* ******** ********* ********** ****** ** someone ******* ***** *******. For *******, ***** *** Paris ******* **** ******** of ****, * *** pictured ******* *** ************* *** *************** *** **** the *******, ****** ****** privacy ****; *** **** was*********, ** *** ***** was ********** **** ** legitimate *************.

** *********, *** ***** case **** ** *** grandmaster (** ** ****) would **** ****** **** on *************** ** ******** French ******* **** - which ******* ********* ***** types ** ********** - rather **** *** **** itself.

 

*******, **** *******!

** ***** **** *** American ***********, * ***** the ******** / ******* would ** ******* ** a ****** ** * bathroom *****, ** ***, where ** ** *********, at *****, ********* ** be *** ******. *** example, *** **** *** in **** ******** *** what **** *** **** camera ********? * ** not **** **** **** come **** **** ** this ****, **** *** admission ** ********, *** it ** * ****** stunning ****** ** *** up * ****** ** someone ****** * ******** stall.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,817 reports, 914 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now
Loading Related Reports