Ratings *** *****
*********** ******* ******* ** Pelco:
*****'* ************ ******* **** among *** ***** ** our *****. *** ******** details **** ** ******** and ********** ** ** upcoming ******.
'Old' ******* *******
*** **** ****** ********* ******* Pelco *** ***** ******* to **** ****. **** integrators ***** *****'* ******** as *** **** *** of ****, *** ** far ****** **** *** ability ** ***** ** to *** ****** ** long ****.
- "*** ******** **** **** in *** **** ** years ***. ** ***** they **** **** *******."
- "*** ****."
- "*** ***** *** ***** caught ** **** *** new ***** *****. *********."
- "*** **** ** **** the *****."
- "****** *** ****. *** far ******. ******* ** just **."
- "**** *******, ****** ** technology ******** ******* ***."
- "****** ***** **** **** are ******* ***** **. Slow ** ******."
- "****** ** *** ** cameras ***** *** ** go ** ******, * installed **** *** *******, fiber *******,******* *** ****. Current ********** ***** *** fallen ******, ***** ******** and ************ ********* *** left **** ********** *** of ** ******* ******."
- "** **** *** **** slower ** ********* *** latest ********, *** **** occasionally *** ** *****, they ***** ** *****."
- "*'* ********** *****, *** so **** **** ****** opinion ** *****, *** I **** **** ** our ***** ***** **** have **** ****** ******** one *** ** *******. From ** ***********, ****'** just ******* ******* ****** manufacturer."
- "****** **** * **** of *** *****-*** **** affair, *** **** **** sour, **'* **** **** to ******* *****'* * future **** *** ******* that ** **** ** the **** ** ******* the **** ** ******* it's *** ** **** the ******* ***? *** cameras *** * ***-*****. The ******** ** ******** to ** ****** *** yet ****** ***** ***** dive **... *** **** cry ****. * ***'* know."
- "*****'* **** ****** **** to **** ***** *****. We *****'* **** *** of ***** ***** ** years, ******* ***** ******** weekly ** *** ** out. ** *****'* **** anything ** *** ** our ********** ******** **** suggests *****'* *** ****** to ***** ***** *****."
- "********. ** ******** ***** they **** *** **** to **** *** **** were **** ** *** to *** ** ***** and **** **** **** did **** **** ******** to *** ***** *********** model. ***** * **** in **. **** ****'** done."
- "*** *** ******* **** used ** **. *** & **** * ****** for * ********* *************' current ******* ** **** looking *** * ****** in * ******** - if ***** *****'* ****, can't *** ****** ****'* camera. **** & ***** used ** **** *** industry - ***** *** what ******* **** * great ******* ** ******* up ** * ***** multinational, **** **** *****/***/**."
- "***** ********** ** ****** here ** ****** *** I ***** **** ***'* deserve ****. *** *******, new *** ******** *****. I ******'* *** ***** while *'* **** ** buy ****, ***** ********, Panasonic ***."
- "***** *** *** ******* to **** ******** **** again. **** *** **** legacy ******* *** **** time ** **** ****."
- "**** ***** **** ******** model **** ***** *********** for ***** *** ****** market ******* ************* ****. Not ******, *** ******* on ******, ** ********** leadership. *** ******* ******* on *** ********** ******** model."
- "******* *** *** *** product ** ** ***** ago. ** **** ******** all *** ****** ********* off ** ******. **** they ***** **** **** R&D."
- "**** ** ** *****. Not *******. ***'* **** except *** **** *********** applications."
- "** *** ****** ****, Pelco *** *** ** the ******** *******. ***** their ** ******** *** sub-par. **** ***** ***** acquired ** ********* ********, the ******* ****** ***** to ** ******* ******* with ******** *******."
Price / ******* ******
******** ****** **** ****** been ***** *********, *** *** rise ** ******* ************* (like *********) ** ****** ***** has ****** ****** ** lows **** **** **** it ********* *** ********** to *******. ******* ** Pelco's ******** **** *** technology ********, *********** **** found ** **** ** justify *****'* ******* *****:
- "* **** **** ** overpriced, *** ******* **********. They **** ** ** stuck ** *** *****, and ******* ** ***** history **** **** ******* forward **** *** ******."
- "*** *********."
- "****** ***** *** *** name, ******** = ***..."
- "**** **** ** *** analog ****, *** ** do *** **** **** in ** -*** *********."
- "**** ******."
- "** ******. **** ******* Cant *** **."
- "********* *** **** ** could **."
- "*** ******, *** ****, at *** **** * price. ** *** *** willing ** *** *** dollar *** * ***** hardware ******** **** *** an ******* ******* ***, then ** **** *****."
- "**** ***** ***** *** the ******* *******. ****** for *** ****."
- "**** ****** ** **** good *** *****, ******* and **** *******. ***** product ***** **** *****'* seem ** ******* ** at ***** ***** ******."
- "****** *** ****** *** expensive ******."
- "********** *** *** ***** quality."
***** ******** ********* *******, ** lack **:
- "******* *** **** ****** to *********. ***** *********** is *******."
- "******** ********. *** *********** with ******** *** **** support."
- "**** **** * **** bad ******, ** ******* and ***** *******."
- "*** *** ******* **** other ****** ** ******* or *****."
- "******* *** ***** **** not ***."
- "***** ** *******, ******* and ********** *****."
- "* **** ** *** Pelco *** *** ********** product, *** * ***'* find **** ******* ** quality ** ***** ** features *******."
- "******* *** **** ******** Do **** **** **** an ** ********? ** have ***** **** **** this *******."
- "**** ** *** ***** IP ******* * **** ever ******. **** ****** the *** ******* **** we ******** ********* (****** matrix)."
**********, ***** *** ******* are ***********, *** ***** is ********* ****.
Schneider ********* ****** *****
******* *********** **** ********* as * **********, *** refuse ** ******** ***** for **** ******. ****** simply *** ********* ** a *** *** *** ownership ** *****.
- "********** **** *** *** map ***** *********. ** use ** **** **** now *** ** ** is ******* ****."
- "** ******** ********* * competitor *** ** *** use *****."
- "***** ** **********."
- "****** ****** ******* ***** a ************ ** **********. Will *** ***** * line **** ******** **** me."
- "** * ** **** veteran, **** *** **** a ***** ** **** they **** ** **. Schneider *** ****** **** company. ***** ** ** vision *** **** *** not ** ** *******."
- "***** ********* ******** ****** them **** **** ********."
- "****** **** ***** **** years ***, **** ** was ****** *** ******** and **** **** * huge **** ** ******. Since ****, **** **** it, **** **** ***** and ***** *********** ** Schneider *** ***** **** if **** ******** ***********."
- "****** ********** **** ***** product *****. ***** **** were ******** ** ********* Electric ** **** ******* not ** ******* * competitor. ***** ***** ****** to **** ***** ******** only ***** ******** ******* and ******* *** **** they *** **** ** Schneider ******** *'* *** sure **** ********* **** offer."
- "******* ***** **** ***** ago. *** ****** ****** to **** *****."
- "**** ****** **********. ***** bad ******, *** ** reason ** **** ***** with ****, ********** **** Schneider ******** ****** ****, what ** **** **** about ***** ************. ** one * **** ********* Pelco ********."
Lack ** ***********
**** *********** ******** ***** who ***** **** ***, emphasizing *** ********* ****:
- "***?"
- "***'* *****? ;)"
- "*****?? *** **** ***** around?"
- "**** ** *** ****, are ***** ***** ** Europe?"
- "*** **** ***** ****?"
- "*** **** ***** ******? My ********** ** **** they *** ****** *** of ***** ****** ********, and **** **** **** die ***."
- "**** - ***** **** 2016 - ***?"
Positive, ** ** ***** **** ********, ******** ** *****
******* *** ************ **********, there **** * *** positive ** ********** ******** for *****.
- "* **** ***** ** a ******, ******** *** made ************. ***** *** a ******* ** *** camera ******** **** ***** a ********** * ***** of *******. * **** always *** * **** response **** ***** ******* with ***** *******. **** also ***** ************* ******** options *** ********* **** do *** **** ******* to ** ** *** sore, ** ***** **** something * ****** **** "hidden"."
- "***** *** ** ***** with ******* ** ********, a ***** *** ******** choice. ******* ** *** go **."
- "***** ***** ** ** coming ******, *** ********* nearly ****** ****. ** like **** **** *** showing ******, *** *** enough ** ****** **** to ***** * ***** first ********."
- "******* *** ** ***** cameras. *** **** **** at **** **** ******* as **** ********* **** Schneider ********'* ********** ******."
- "**** ********, ******* ***** with ***** ******* *** they **** ***'* ***** out ** ******* ****** than *** ** *** other *** *******."
- "******* ** ***** ****. Delivery ***** *** ****. However *** **** ********** and *** *** ********** does *** **** ** be **** ******** ** other ***** ***."
- "*** *** ******* *** for *** ******** ********. Rugged, *****, *********, **********. I've *********** **** ********, pedestals, ***."
Pelco *******
** ******* ****,***** ***** * *** CEO**** ******* *** ********. He *** *********** *** *********** of * *** *** platform,**********, *** ******** ** specific ******-*** ******** *******. While ***** *** **** making ***** ******** **** VideoXpert, ********** *** *********** takes **** *** **** are ********* ******* ***** with **+ ***** ** development. ************, ***** ****** multi-imagers **** ****** **** competitively (******° **** *************° **** *******). ** *** ***** hand, ************* * ****** ** 2016*** *** ******* * fairly ***** *********.
***** *** *********** *********** Pelco ***** (***** ***********, integrator ***************, ******* ********* limitations *** ******* ***** competition), ***** **** ******* significant ********** *** ***** to ****** ** **** some ** *** ****** market ********.
Comments (21)
Jon Dillabaugh
12/02/16 02:10pm
I honestly feel like this will be the results of the Axis poll in a few years....
Create New Topic
Undisclosed Manufacturer #1
They really need to invest in their own engineering crew. They are not able to keep pace with new product testing and as a result, their hardware recommendations and system restrictions have become extreme such that if you were to follow them, you would be spending a fortune in hardware that is no longer necessary with newer firmware and software.
Create New Topic
Undisclosed Integrator #2
Still Riding on the Name, Not up to speed with the tech advances needed to compete.
They still have some of the market though.
We went from only pelco to no pelco in 10 years and thats because others surpassed in integration and adtability features. legacy to state of the art.
Create New Topic
Claudio Almeida
The worst mistake Schneider did was thinking that their brand was most important than Pelco for the security market.
Since the acquisition I've been seeing Schneider booths in security exhibitions, not Pelco booths anymore. If you looked carefully inside the booth, you could find a small area with Pelco products.
Well, market proves they are wrong...
Create New Topic
Jim Rao
Sad....is the one of many words to explain a company that was one the Gold Standard in the Video Industry. Most all of us who grew up in this business couldn't wait until the next revision of the "Pelco Catalog". I sold millions of dollars of their products and at the time never regretted a penny of it.
Things you don't forget in life.....Flying on the Pelco Jet from Pittsburg to Clovis.
Create New Topic
Undisclosed Manufacturer #6
Love how the responses to the Pelco favorability ratings automatically swing toward Axis. That alone should tell you something.
Create New Topic
Undisclosed Integrator #7
Anyone agree?
Pelco blog post: Quality, Reliability and the Quest for Innovation
Create New Topic