Dahua Integrated IR PTZ Tested

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Jun 04, 2014

Integrated IR cameras are growing rapidly in popularity, as they help solve a key surveillance problem - poor low light imaging.

However, integrated IR is rarely offered inside PTZs. Indeed, no major Western manufacturer offers an integrated IR PTZ. Recently, though, a number of Asian manufacturers have started to offer these models.

As part of our Dahua HD CVI test, we paid ~$450 for a 720p HD, 20x optical zoom, integrated IR PTZ, rated for 100m IR range. That is quite a price point, considering many Western manufacturers fixed IR IP cameras are more expensive than that.

In this report, we share our test findings of this integrated IR PTZ vs an Axis Q series PTZ.

The image below shows, left to right, the IR PTZ itself, the IR LED pattern and an excerpt of a person being tracked by the IR PTZ:

********** ** ******* *** growing ******* ** **********, as **** **** ***** a *** ************ ******* - **** *** ***** imaging.

*******, ********** ** ** rarely ******* ****** ****. Indeed, ** ***** ******* manufacturer ****** ** ********** IR ***. ********, ******, a ****** ** ***** manufacturers **** ******* ** offer ***** ******.

** **** ** ******** ** *** ****, ** **** ~$*** for a 720p **, *** ******* zoom, ********** ** ***, ***** *** **** IR *****. **** ** quite * ***** *****, considering **** ******* ************* fixed ** ** ******* are **** ********* **** that.

** **** ******, ** share *** **** ******** of **** ********** ** PTZ ** ** **** Q ****** ***.

*** ***** ***** *****, left ** *****, *** IR *** ******, *** IR *** ******* *** an ******* ** * person ***** ******* ** the ** ***:

** ****** *** **** day *** ***** ** distance ** ** ***' / *** ****** ** see *** *********** ****** and *** ********* ******* the *******.

[***************]

Key ********

***** *** *** *** findings **** **** ****:

  • **** *****: ******** ************ **** *** *** illuminated subjects ** ***'+ (~****) in *** ****, **** further **** *** ********* 100m *****.
  • ** ************ ********* ******* to ******* ** **** level, ********* ***** ** LEDs *** **** *** the ***** ** **** set ** *********** ** ************.
  • ********* ********: ** *** ********** ****** to ******** ********* ***** ******** subjects ** ******** *******, with *** ******* ****** 5 ******* ** ****, **** ********* at ***** **** ** on.
  • ***** * ***, *** IR *** *** ****** able ** *** ******** at ** ** ***' with ************ ******* ** to ***'. *** ***-** ** PTZ (****** *****-*) *** ****** ** see ******** **** ** **' at **** ***** *****.
  • ** ***** **** ******* lot ****** **, ~* lux ** **', *** IR *** **** *********** the ***-** ***, ***** is **** ** ****** the ********** **** ***** up ** ~***', *** shows ** ******* ** the *******.
  • ** *** *** ****** to ******* ******* ****** at *** ***** *** to ** ************. **** other ********** ** *******, reducing ******* ***** ******* ***** capture *** ******** *** rest ** *** *****, making ** ********. 

***************

** ************* **** ****** to ** ******* ********, integrated ** **** ******* images ** ****** ***** traditional PTZs ******* ****. *******, **** and/or ********** ********* ** the ***** ********** ** PTZ **** ****** ***** details ********* *** ********* cumbersome, **** **** ***** preset *********. *******, ** license ***** ******* ** a *** ***********, ********* overexposure ** * *******.

*******, ******, ***** **** are ** *******, ********** IR ** ******* *** option **** ***** **** improve *** ********* *** viability ** **** *** operator ********** *********.

Physical ********

** **** ***** ** review *** ******** ************ of *** ********-**, **** ******* the * **** ** the ******'* ****, ***** are ******** **/*** ********* on ****** **** *****.

**** ***** ***** ***** *** IR **** ********* ** the ****** ** ****** from *** ********* ** wide ***** ******. *** side **** *** **** for **** ********, *** can ** **** ********* down ** *** ***** two **** (**** *** wider *****, ******* ********) increase ** *****.

IR ***********

** **** ***** ** follow * ******* **** the ****** ******** ** ~500' *** ****, **** several ********** ***** ******:

  • ** ************ ******* ****** covered *** ***** ** view ** ******* ******, with ************ **** ******* very ***** ** *** camera (~**' *** ******).
  • ** ************ ***** ******** specifications (****), ************ *** subject **** ** ***'/~**** *** beyond.
  • *********, ******* ****** **** other **** ** ********, was ********** **** **** using **, ************ ********* ***** to ** ******** *** PTZ ********.

Parking *** ***********

** ****** *** **** integrated ** *** ******* the ***** **** *****-* in * ***'+ ******* lot ** ************ ***********. ***** ****** ranged **** ***** *.* to *.* *** ** target, ********* ** *** subject's ******** **** ******** lighting, **** ** *** FOV *****:

** ~**', *** ******* ****** range, *** ** *** displays ***** ******* ** our *******'* **** **** the **** ***** ******* to **** */*. *** 1080p ******* ********** ****** ***** ** this ***** *****.

 ****** ** ***', ** power ** ***** ******, with ******* ** *** subject *** ***** **** similar.

** ~***', ** **** reached *** ******'* ******* optical **** *****, *** its ******* ** **** focus ** ******* ********, with *** ******* ********* blurry, ****** *-* ***** of *** ***** *** still *******.

*******, ** ***', ********** of *** ******* ** greatly *******, *** **** 1 ** *** ***** is ***** ********** *******.

******* ***** ******* ***********

****, ** ****** ** each ******** **** * car ** ***** ******* plate ******* ************ ** each ******. ** **', the ** *** *********** the *****, ********** ******* out *** *******, ***** the ***** *** **** a ***** ******* *** only ** *** ***'* license ***** ******. **** *** shutter ***** *** ** adjusted ** *** ** PTZ ** ******** *******, but **** ******* *** rest ** *** ***** so ** ** ** unusable.

** ***', ******** *********** is *** ****, **** the **** *** ********* *****. 

** ~***' *** ******, PPF ***** *** *** for *** *****-* ** *******. The ** *** ******* overexposed. 

******* ***********

**** ** ****** *** cameras ****** *** *** at **** ******** **** our ********* *****. ** *** daytime, both ******* ******* ******* details ** ~**' *****, though *** ***** ***** is **** ** **** 3-4 ***** *******, **** the **** ***** **** at *** ****** ** the ***** (**** **/** vs. */*). 

** ***', *********** ** similar.

** ~***', ** **** reached both *******' ******* **** range. *** **** *****-* *** some ****** ******** ** this *****, ********* ******* of *** ******* *** chart, ****** *** ***** is ***** **** ******* than *** **** ** PTZ.

*******, ** ***', *********** of *** **** *** *******, reducing ******* ** *** subject, ****** ** ** still **** ** **** to **** */* ** the ***** ****** */* in *** **** ** PTZ. ******* ** *** subject *** *******.

****** *********, **** ******* are ****** **** ** capture * ******* ***** of * ****** ******* during *** ***, **** at ******* ***** ****** (~420').

 

Open ***** ***********

****, ** ****** *** cameras ** ** **** ***** bordered ** ********** ** both ***** ** **** performance ** **** ********, with **** ******* ***** on *** ****** (~* lux ** **** ******):

********* ***********

**** ******* ****** **, about * *** ** target, *** ** *** easily *********** *** ***** model, **** ************ ******* of *** ******* *** legibility ** *** **** chart **** ** **** 6/7. *** ***** *** is **** ********** **** to *** *** *******, and *** **** ***** is ******* **** ** line *. 

** ***', *** ** PTZ ******** ******* *******, while *** **** *** ******** only ** ******* ** the ******* *** *****.

** ***', **** ******* have ******* ***** ******* optical **** *****. ** ***** from *** **** *** is ******* ******, *** still ******** **** ******* of *** ******* **** the ***** ******* ** line *. 

*******, ** ***', ** power ** ******* ********* though *** ******* ** still ****** *******, ****** without *******.

Test **********

******* **** ****** ***** default ******** ****** ********* specified, ** *** *.***. 

******* ****:

Comments (20)

Given how far the Dahua camera can see with IR, and given their low price, are there any reasons why one might still consider the Avigilon adaptive IR cameras, other than for a neater form factor?

Reasons for Avigilon or other adaptive IR cameras vs a Dahua integrated IR PTZ:

  • Adaptive IR can provide greater details / less overexposure, e.g., with license plate capture.
  • Dahua is Dahua, which means buying from various OEMs, trying to get support direct from Dahua, etc.
  • This model was CVI, not IP. The IP version, from the same site we bought this CVI camera, was 2x more for IP. [Correction, there is a different IP integrated IR PTZ model that is roughly the same price as the CVI version]

Thank you John, that's very useful information. I'm surprised the IP version of the Dahua camera is twice the price. That makes the Avigilon well worth considering.

Luke, update and correction. Someone at Dahua contacted us and pointed out that there are two series - 'Ultra-Smart', their higher end and 'Eco-Savvy', their lower end.

Within 'Eco-Savvy', there is another IP integrated IR PTZ model that is roughly the same price as the CVI version.

Hi John, thank you for this information. It's great that someone from Dahua contacted you with this information but it would be better if it was easier to find the differences in these products on their website.

The IP version, from the same site we bought this CVI camera, was 2x more for IP.

Ok, for a cheap mini dome I can see 2X the price, because they are little more than a cheap lens, sensor and encoder. But a speedome PTZ with tons of IR? You would think the encoder would be a much smaller part of the cost, no?

Do you think that Dahua is artificially supporting these price points or do you think they are based in engineering realities?

Hard to guess the cause.

Of the 3 IP models listed on that site, even the least expensive is higher resolution and spec'd for greater IR range. So it's probably more expensive to make (those factors + the built in IP encoder). How much of the price delta that accounts for, I don't know.

We have been using IR PTZ's for about 5 or 6 years and have had the 30x Dahua 2Mp IP model installed on a 10m telescopic pole on our demo truck for over a year with great results.

They are a very cost effective product and we love them for our rural clients with 100m in pitch black at night to view around the farms etc.

Dahua CVI is a low cost alternative that appears to compare with high end Analogue and in our opinion is really only a cheaper alternative to IP for Analogue sites where they want to upgrade 6 - 10 year old Analogue equipment and use the same cable infrastructure to save on cost.

We have been using Dahua gear now for nearly 2 years with good results and have a fair understanding of it's pros and cons (and idiosincrasies).

In most cases we actually do our own R&D with the products in house.

We are now investigating using Dahua Cameras and encoders with HD Witness as an alternative for larger site upgrades.

I find no anti/beautiful results mentioned about this above. I am I only one who states this thing is most unpretty, with kindness. It can matter when then one of your clienteles looks away to disgusting reason, and they are lost from it forever just because of its outer casing look and face like mr roboto-ish. Anyone else wish to say this, but they did't?

Tedor, well, beauty is in the eye of the beholder as they say...

However, one manufacturer did point out two thing that are relevant to this point:

  • Since there is no bubble, the camera's positioning can clearly be seen, even from fairly far away, which reduces its discreteness. As it is more overt, people may consider it less aesthetic (e.g., why people like domes).
  • The lack of a bubble also increases low light performance, as the bubble absorbs some portion of light.

Note, the lack of a bubble is because putting a bubble over the IR LEDs would block / disperse the illumination output.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder...

but ugly goes right thru their bones... But I do know somebody who would fall in love. Spiders would love it spiders who would give their eight thumbs way up, to die and go to dahua heaven, they would think they had. Unless the moving/wirling thing could shake them across the gears and gently grind their pulps down. noone can know this right away.

But can clogged spiders be some problem with this because of bright leds calling them and open face catching them in it?

The Dahua units, like the Hikvision units and likely the Samsung units have a sealed "ball" and the face is sealed. Spider intrusion inside the ball is highly unlikely.

Spider intrusion inside the ball is highly unlikely.

What about spider occlusion?, also mentioned (I think)?

Like the Itsy, Bitsy spider, it will get washed away by the rain.

In all seriousness, I have not had any spider issues reported.

It is a matter of putting function ahead of form which is required to acheive this function. This is a much more economical solution than installing a 360 degree IR array.

Anyone have any experience with the Samsung SNP-6200RH? It also has built-in IR with 100 M capability.

Good question about the Samsung model. I've started a new discussion with feedback here: Any Experience With Samsung Integrated IR PTZ?

is it just me or is anyone else surprised with the extremly poor results from the AXIS camera? I would expect it to preform better... sure it took the license plates but the lowlight preformance overall is noteworthy.

Well, it's got a f stop of F1.6–2.9 and it is seeing through a bubble so those two factors both undermine low light performance notably.

And even if it was a 'super' low light cameras, it is hard to match having your own illumination (i.e., integrated IR) when it's really dark. For example, review the results of Super Low Light vs Integrated IR Shootout.

Hi Ethan, bearing in mind your article above, I'd like to put in a request for the Dahua DH-SD6AL230F-HNI to be tested. It's been announced but I don't know if it is shipping yet.

The interesting thing about this PTZ camera is that it claims up to 500 meters of IR range using "Laser IR". This is a big step up from the 100 meter claimed range of the Dahua camera in the above report. It also seems to be several times beyond the claimed IR range of any other manufacturer but is it useful? Does it compete in any way with thermal cameras at this range, especially given its higher resolution than thermal cameras?

I wonder if the laser helps overcome autofocus problems at longer ranges. I also wonder about the safety of the laser and whether it could cause eye damage? I wonder who'd like to test that at IPVM?!

Given the claimed IR range, could this camera be useful for checking up on livestock on rural properties during the day and night? Thank you for considering my request.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Anyvision Facial Recognition Tested on Aug 21, 2019
Anyvision is aiming for $1 billion in revenue by 2022, backed by $74 million in funding. But does their performance live up to the hype they have...
Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...
ZK Teco Atlas Access Control Tested on Aug 20, 2019
Who needs access specialists? China-based ZKTeco claims its newest access panel 'makes it very easy for anyone to learn and install access control...
Axis 4K Camera Shootout 2019 on Aug 14, 2019
Axis' 4K Q3518-LVE claims the "best video quality possible", with Lightfinder super low light performance, Axis' high end Forensic WDR, and...
Avigilon Blue VSaaS Tested on Aug 05, 2019
Avigilon says Blue is a "powerful integrator cloud service platform", easy to set up and configure, quickly scale business, by leveraging cloud...
Hikvision 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 02, 2019
With their latest Smart Series 5 cameras, Hikvision is claiming cameras "fully loaded" with "state-of-the-art technology for high performance and...
Hanwha 4K Wisenet P Camera Tested on Jul 30, 2019
Hanwha claims "premium performance" and to "deliver the best in high resolution performance and efficiency" with their Wisenet P series 4K models,...
Wyze AI Analytics Tested - Beats Axis and Hikvision on Jul 17, 2019
$20 camera disruptor Wyze has released free person detection deep learning analytics to all of their users, claiming users will "Only get notified...
Axis ARTPEC-7 P1375-E Camera Tested on Jul 12, 2019
Axis claims the new P1375-E box camera with ARTPEC-7 chip delivers "clear, sharp images in any lighting condition." But how well does it do? We...
Last Chance - Camera Course Summer 2019 on Jul 11, 2019
Last day to register is Thursday, July 11, 2019. This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...

Most Recent Industry Reports

TMA Apologizes to Amazon / Ring on Aug 23, 2019
Not only is Amazon / Ring making major incursions into the residential security market, the organization representing the biggest incumbents, The...
China Dahua Replaces Their Software With US Pepper on Aug 22, 2019
What does a US government banned company do to improve its security positioning in the US? Well, Dahua is unveiling a novel solution, partnering...
Security Integrators Outlook On Remaining Integrators In 2025 on Aug 22, 2019
The industry has changed substantially in the last decade, with the rise of IP cameras and the race to the bottom. Indeed, more changes may be...
First GDPR Facial Recognition Fine For Sweden School on Aug 22, 2019
A school in Sweden has been fined $20,000 for using facial recognition to keep attendance in what is Sweden's first GDPR fine. Notably, the fine is...
Anyvision Facial Recognition Tested on Aug 21, 2019
Anyvision is aiming for $1 billion in revenue by 2022, backed by $74 million in funding. But does their performance live up to the hype they have...
JCI Sues Wyze on Aug 21, 2019
The mega manufacturer / integrator JCI has sued the fast-growing $20 camera Seattle startup Wyze. Inside this note: Share the court...
Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...
ZK Teco Atlas Access Control Tested on Aug 20, 2019
Who needs access specialists? China-based ZKTeco claims its newest access panel 'makes it very easy for anyone to learn and install access control...
Uniview Beats Intel In Trademark Lawsuit on Aug 19, 2019
Uniview has won a long-running trademark lawsuit brought by Intel, with Beijing's highest court reversing an earlier Intel win, centered on...
Suprema Biometric Mass Leak Examined on Aug 19, 2019
While Suprema is rarely discussed even within the physical security market, the South Korean biometrics manufacturer made global news this past...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact