Dahua Integrated IR PTZ Tested

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Jun 04, 2014

Integrated IR cameras are growing rapidly in popularity, as they help solve a key surveillance problem - poor low light imaging.

However, integrated IR is rarely offered inside PTZs. Indeed, no major Western manufacturer offers an integrated IR PTZ. Recently, though, a number of Asian manufacturers have started to offer these models.

As part of our Dahua HD CVI test, we paid ~$450 for a 720p HD, 20x optical zoom, integrated IR PTZ, rated for 100m IR range. That is quite a price point, considering many Western manufacturers fixed IR IP cameras are more expensive than that.

In this report, we share our test findings of this integrated IR PTZ vs an Axis Q series PTZ.

The image below shows, left to right, the IR PTZ itself, the IR LED pattern and an excerpt of a person being tracked by the IR PTZ:

We tested the PTZs day and night at distance up to 450' / 137 meters to see how performance varied and the tradeoffs amongst the cameras.

********** ** ******* *** ******* ******* ** **********, ** **** help ***** * *** ************ ******* - **** *** ***** imaging.

*******, ********** ** ** ****** ******* ****** ****. ******, ** major ******* ************ ****** ** ********** ** ***. ********, ******, a ****** ** ***** ************* **** ******* ** ***** ***** models.

** **** ** ******** ** *** ****, ** **** ~$*** *** * **** **, *** ******* ****, ********** ** ***, ***** *** **** ** *****. **** ** ***** * price *****, *********** **** ******* ************* ***** ** ** ******* are **** ********* **** ****.

** **** ******, ** ***** *** **** ******** ** **** integrated ** *** ** ** **** * ****** ***.

*** ***** ***** *****, **** ** *****, *** ** *** itself, *** ** *** ******* *** ** ******* ** * person ***** ******* ** *** ** ***:

** ****** *** **** *** *** ***** ** ******** ** to ***' / *** ****** ** *** *** *********** ****** and *** ********* ******* *** *******.

[***************]

Key ********

***** *** *** *** ******** **** **** ****:

  • **** *****: ******** ************ **** *** *** *********** ******** ** ***'+ (~****) ** *** dark, **** ******* **** *** ********* **** *****.
  • ** ************ ********* ******* ** ******* ** **** *****, ********* which ** **** *** **** *** *** ***** ** **** set ** *********** ** ************.
  • ********* ********: ** *** ********** ****** ** ******** ********* ***** ******** ******** ** changing *******, **** *** ******* ****** * ******* ** ****, **** ********* at ***** **** ** **.
  • ***** * ***, *** ** *** *** ****** **** ** see ******** ** ** ** ***' **** ************ ******* ** to ***'. *** ***-** ** *** (****** *****-*) *** ****** ** *** ******** **** ** **' ** **** light *****.
  • ** ***** **** ******* *** ****** **, ~* *** ** 50', *** ** *** **** *********** *** ***-** ***, ***** is **** ** ****** *** ********** **** ***** ** ** ~100', *** ***** ** ******* ** *** *******.
  • ** *** *** ****** ** ******* ******* ****** ** *** range *** ** ** ************. **** ***** ********** ** *******, reducing ******* ***** ******* ***** ******* *** ******** *** **** ** the *****, ****** ** ********. 

***************

** ************* **** ****** ** ** ******* ********, ********** ** PTZs ******* ****** ** ****** ***** *********** **** ******* ****. *******, **** and/or ********** ********* ** *** ***** ********** ** *** **** seeing ***** ******* ********* *** ********* **********, **** **** ***** preset *********. *******, ** ******* ***** ******* ** * *** requirement, ********* ************ ** * *******.

*******, ******, ***** **** *** ** *******, ********** ** ** clearly *** ****** **** ***** **** ******* *** ********* *** viability ** **** *** ******** ********** *********.

Physical ********

** **** ***** ** ****** *** ******** ************ ** *** ********-**, most ******* *** * **** ** *** ******'* ****, ***** are ******** **/*** ********* ** ****** **** *****.

**** ***** ***** ***** *** ** **** ********* ** *** ****** is ****** **** *** ********* ** **** ***** ******. *** side **** *** **** *** **** ********, *** *** ** seen ********* **** ** *** ***** *** **** (**** *** wider *****, ******* ********) ******** ** *****.

IR ***********

** **** ***** ** ****** * ******* **** *** ****** location ** ~***' *** ****, **** ******* ********** ***** ******:

  • ** ************ ******* ****** ******* *** ***** ** **** ** various ******, **** ************ **** ******* **** ***** ** *** camera (~**' *** ******).
  • ** ************ ***** ******** ************** (****), ************ *** ******* **** ** 450'/~137m *** ******.
  • *********, ******* ****** **** ***** **** ** ********, *** ********** slow **** ***** **, ************ ********* ***** ** ** ******** *** PTZ ********.

Parking *** ***********

** ****** *** **** ********** ** *** ******* *** ***** Axis *****-* ** * ***'+ ******* *** ** ************ ***********. ***** ****** ****** **** ***** *.* ** *.* lux ** ******, ********* ** *** *******'* ******** **** ******** lighting, **** ** *** *** *****:

** ~**', *** ******* ****** *****, *** ** *** ******** ***** details ** *** *******'* **** **** *** **** ***** ******* to **** */*. *** ***** ******* ********** ****** ***** ** **** ***** *****.

 ****** ** ***', ** ***** ** ***** ******, **** ******* of *** ******* *** ***** **** *******.

** ~***', ** **** ******* *** ******'* ******* ******* **** level, *** *** ******* ** **** ***** ** ******* ********, with *** ******* ********* ******, ****** *-* ***** ** *** chart *** ***** *******.

*******, ** ***', ********** ** *** ******* ** ******* *******, but **** * ** *** ***** ** ***** ********** *******.

******* ***** ******* ***********

****, ** ****** ** **** ******** **** * *** ** check ******* ***** ******* ************ ** **** ******. ** **', the ** *** *********** *** *****, ********** ******* *** *** numbers, ***** *** ***** *** **** * ***** ******* *** only ** *** ***'* ******* ***** ******. **** *** ******* ***** may ** ******** ** *** ** *** ** ******** *******, but **** ******* *** **** ** *** ***** ** ** to ** ********.

** ***', ******** *********** ** *** ****, **** *** **** PTZ capturing *****. 

** ~***' *** ******, *** ***** *** *** *** *** Q6045-E to *******. *** ** *** ******* ***********. 

******* ***********

**** ** ****** *** ******* ****** *** *** ** **** location **** *** ********* *****. ** *** *******, **** ******* ******* ******* details ** ~**' *****, ****** *** ***** ***** ** **** to **** *-* ***** *******, **** *** **** ***** **** at *** ****** ** *** ***** (**** **/** **. */*). 

** ***', *********** ** *******.

** ~***', ** **** ******* **** *******' ******* **** *****. *** Axis *****-* *** **** ****** ******** ** **** *****, ********* ******* of *** ******* *** *****, ****** *** ***** ** ***** more ******* **** *** **** ** ***.

*******, ** ***', *********** ** *** **** *** *******, ******** ******* of *** *******, ****** ** ** ***** **** ** **** to **** */* ** *** ***** ****** */* ** *** 720p ** ***. ******* ** *** ******* *** *******.

****** *********, **** ******* *** ****** **** ** ******* * license ***** ** * ****** ******* ****** *** ***, **** at ******* ***** ****** (~***').

 

Open ***** ***********

****, ** ****** *** ******* ** ** **** ***** ******** ** vegetation ** **** ***** ** **** *********** ** **** ********, with **** ******* ***** ** *** ****** (~* *** ** near ******):

********* ***********

**** ******* ****** **, ***** * *** ** ******, *** IR *** ****** *********** *** ***** *****, **** ************ ******* of *** ******* *** ********** ** *** **** ***** **** to **** */*. *** ***** *** ** **** ********** **** to *** *** *******, *** *** **** ***** ** ******* only ** **** *. 

** ***', *** ** *** ******** ******* *******, ***** *** Axis *** ******** **** ** ******* ** *** ******* *** *****.

** ***', **** ******* **** ******* ***** ******* ******* **** range. IR ***** **** *** **** *** ** ******* ******, *** still ******** **** ******* ** *** ******* **** *** ***** legible ** **** *. 

*******, ** ***', ** ***** ** ******* ********* ****** *** subject ** ***** ****** *******, ****** ******* *******.

Test **********

******* **** ****** ***** ******* ******** ****** ********* *********, ** FPS *.***. 

******* ****:

Comments (20)

Given how far the Dahua camera can see with IR, and given their low price, are there any reasons why one might still consider the Avigilon adaptive IR cameras, other than for a neater form factor?

Reasons for Avigilon or other adaptive IR cameras vs a Dahua integrated IR PTZ:

  • Adaptive IR can provide greater details / less overexposure, e.g., with license plate capture.
  • Dahua is Dahua, which means buying from various OEMs, trying to get support direct from Dahua, etc.
  • This model was CVI, not IP. The IP version, from the same site we bought this CVI camera, was 2x more for IP. [Correction, there is a different IP integrated IR PTZ model that is roughly the same price as the CVI version]

Thank you John, that's very useful information. I'm surprised the IP version of the Dahua camera is twice the price. That makes the Avigilon well worth considering.

Luke, update and correction. Someone at Dahua contacted us and pointed out that there are two series - 'Ultra-Smart', their higher end and 'Eco-Savvy', their lower end.

Within 'Eco-Savvy', there is another IP integrated IR PTZ model that is roughly the same price as the CVI version.

Hi John, thank you for this information. It's great that someone from Dahua contacted you with this information but it would be better if it was easier to find the differences in these products on their website.

The IP version, from the same site we bought this CVI camera, was 2x more for IP.

Ok, for a cheap mini dome I can see 2X the price, because they are little more than a cheap lens, sensor and encoder. But a speedome PTZ with tons of IR? You would think the encoder would be a much smaller part of the cost, no?

Do you think that Dahua is artificially supporting these price points or do you think they are based in engineering realities?

Hard to guess the cause.

Of the 3 IP models listed on that site, even the least expensive is higher resolution and spec'd for greater IR range. So it's probably more expensive to make (those factors + the built in IP encoder). How much of the price delta that accounts for, I don't know.

We have been using IR PTZ's for about 5 or 6 years and have had the 30x Dahua 2Mp IP model installed on a 10m telescopic pole on our demo truck for over a year with great results.

They are a very cost effective product and we love them for our rural clients with 100m in pitch black at night to view around the farms etc.

Dahua CVI is a low cost alternative that appears to compare with high end Analogue and in our opinion is really only a cheaper alternative to IP for Analogue sites where they want to upgrade 6 - 10 year old Analogue equipment and use the same cable infrastructure to save on cost.

We have been using Dahua gear now for nearly 2 years with good results and have a fair understanding of it's pros and cons (and idiosincrasies).

In most cases we actually do our own R&D with the products in house.

We are now investigating using Dahua Cameras and encoders with HD Witness as an alternative for larger site upgrades.

I find no anti/beautiful results mentioned about this above. I am I only one who states this thing is most unpretty, with kindness. It can matter when then one of your clienteles looks away to disgusting reason, and they are lost from it forever just because of its outer casing look and face like mr roboto-ish. Anyone else wish to say this, but they did't?

Tedor, well, beauty is in the eye of the beholder as they say...

However, one manufacturer did point out two thing that are relevant to this point:

  • Since there is no bubble, the camera's positioning can clearly be seen, even from fairly far away, which reduces its discreteness. As it is more overt, people may consider it less aesthetic (e.g., why people like domes).
  • The lack of a bubble also increases low light performance, as the bubble absorbs some portion of light.

Note, the lack of a bubble is because putting a bubble over the IR LEDs would block / disperse the illumination output.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder...

but ugly goes right thru their bones... But I do know somebody who would fall in love. Spiders would love it spiders who would give their eight thumbs way up, to die and go to dahua heaven, they would think they had. Unless the moving/wirling thing could shake them across the gears and gently grind their pulps down. noone can know this right away.

But can clogged spiders be some problem with this because of bright leds calling them and open face catching them in it?

The Dahua units, like the Hikvision units and likely the Samsung units have a sealed "ball" and the face is sealed. Spider intrusion inside the ball is highly unlikely.

Spider intrusion inside the ball is highly unlikely.

What about spider occlusion?, also mentioned (I think)?

Like the Itsy, Bitsy spider, it will get washed away by the rain.

In all seriousness, I have not had any spider issues reported.

It is a matter of putting function ahead of form which is required to acheive this function. This is a much more economical solution than installing a 360 degree IR array.

Anyone have any experience with the Samsung SNP-6200RH? It also has built-in IR with 100 M capability.

Good question about the Samsung model. I've started a new discussion with feedback here: Any Experience With Samsung Integrated IR PTZ?

is it just me or is anyone else surprised with the extremly poor results from the AXIS camera? I would expect it to preform better... sure it took the license plates but the lowlight preformance overall is noteworthy.

Well, it's got a f stop of F1.6–2.9 and it is seeing through a bubble so those two factors both undermine low light performance notably.

And even if it was a 'super' low light cameras, it is hard to match having your own illumination (i.e., integrated IR) when it's really dark. For example, review the results of Super Low Light vs Integrated IR Shootout.

Hi Ethan, bearing in mind your article above, I'd like to put in a request for the Dahua DH-SD6AL230F-HNI to be tested. It's been announced but I don't know if it is shipping yet.

The interesting thing about this PTZ camera is that it claims up to 500 meters of IR range using "Laser IR". This is a big step up from the 100 meter claimed range of the Dahua camera in the above report. It also seems to be several times beyond the claimed IR range of any other manufacturer but is it useful? Does it compete in any way with thermal cameras at this range, especially given its higher resolution than thermal cameras?

I wonder if the laser helps overcome autofocus problems at longer ranges. I also wonder about the safety of the laser and whether it could cause eye damage? I wonder who'd like to test that at IPVM?!

Given the claimed IR range, could this camera be useful for checking up on livestock on rural properties during the day and night? Thank you for considering my request.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Directory of Video Intercoms on Nov 13, 2018
Video Intercoms, also known as Video Door-Phones or Video Entry Systems, have been growing in the past decade as more and more IP camera...
Axis 2N Intercom Tested on Nov 08, 2018
Axis expanded its video intercom business buying Czech-based 2N in 2016. Despite competing against owner Axis' intercoms, 2N recently registered as...
Ubiquiti Protect Video Surveillance Profile on Nov 07, 2018
Ubiquiti has now been in the video surveillance market for 7 years (see our first coverage back in 2011). In that time, the company's revenue has...
Dahua Dual Imager Dome Camera Tested (HDBW4231FN-E2-M) on Nov 07, 2018
Dahua has introduced a dual-imager dome model, the HDBW4231FN-E2-M, with two independently positionable sensors including integrated IR, not found...
Directory Of Video Doorbells on Nov 06, 2018
Video doorbells are one of the fastest growing categories in video surveillance, especially among residences. The optimal placement of these...
Solar-Powered, Smart-Phone-Based Access Kit (VIZPin) Examined on Nov 02, 2018
Cloud-based access control company VIZPin is releasing a solar-powered and smart phone based access control system for gates and other remote...
Video Surveillance Hard Drive Failure Statistics 2018 on Nov 02, 2018
Hard drive failures can be significant service problems but how common of an issue are they in video surveillance? How long do drives last when...
IP Camera Installation Tool Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Ideal, Hanwha, Triplett, Veracity on Oct 23, 2018
Setting up IP cameras has historically been challenging, with techs often precariously using a laptop on a ladder or lift. Some options for install...
Hanwha Dual Imager Dome Camera Tested (PNM-7000VD) on Oct 18, 2018
Hanwha has introduced their first dual-imager model, the PNM-7000VD, a twin 1080p model featuring independently positionable sensors and a snap-in...
Integrator Laptop Guide on Oct 16, 2018
This 18-page guide provides guidance and statistics about integrator laptop use. 150 integrators explained to IPVM in detail about their laptops,...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Milestone Disrupts Milestone With Arcules on Nov 19, 2018
Milestone is now competing against... Milestone's own spinout Arcules New IPVM testing shows that Arcules has incorporated a substantial amount of...
Pressure Mounts Against Dahua and Hikvision Xinjiang Business on Nov 19, 2018
Pressure is mounting against Hikvision, Dahua, and other companies operating in Xinjiang as an international outcry brews against the Chinese...
Arcules Cloud VMS Tested on Nov 19, 2018
Arcules is a big bet, or as they describe themselves a 'bold company', spun out and backed by Milestone and Canon.  But how good is Arcules cloud...
'Sticker' Surveillance Camera Developed (CSEM Witness) on Nov 16, 2018
The Swiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM) has announced what it calls the: world’s first fully autonomous camera that can be...
ISC East 2018 Mini-Show Final Report on Nov 16, 2018
This is our second (updated) and final show report from ISC East. ISC East, by its own admission, is not a national or international show, billed...
Facial Detection Tested on Nov 16, 2018
Facial detection and recognition are increasingly offered by video surveillance manufacturers. Facial detection detects faces in an image/video...
Throughtek P2P/Cloud Solution Profile on Nov 15, 2018
Many IoT manufacturers either do not have the capabilities or the interest to develop their own cloud management software for their devices....
ASIS Offering Custom Research For Manufacturers on Nov 15, 2018
Manufacturers often want to know what industry people think about trends and, in particular, the segments and product they offer.  ASIS and its...
Hikvision Silent on "Bad Architectural Practices" Cybersecurity Report on Nov 14, 2018
A 'significant vulnerability was found in Hikvision cameras' by VDOO, a startup cybersecurity specialist. Hikvision has fixed the specific...
French Government Threatens School with $1.7M Fine For “Excessive Video Surveillance” on Nov 14, 2018
The French government has notified a high-profile Paris coding academy that it risks a fine of up to 1.5 million euros (about $1.7m) if it...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact