Dahua Discontinuing H.264 Only Products

By: Brian Karas, Published on Dec 08, 2016

Dahua has taken a stand for H.265 and is discontinuing its H.264 only products.

We examine the shakeup inside this report.

***** *** ***** * stand *** *.*** *** is ************* *** *.*** only ********.

** ******* *** ******* inside **** ******.

[***************]

Discontinued ******

***** ** *********** * (discontinuation) **** ****** **+ products, ********* ********** *** 4MP **** ** ***** website [**** ** ****** available]:

[**** ** ****** *********]

***** ***** *** *** publicly ****** ****, ** have ********* **** ******* **** Dahua ** ******* **** as **** ** *** plan ** *********** ***** products ** *** **** few ******.

***** *** ********* *** not ** *** ***********'* ******* *****, ********* **** **** on ***** ******-****** ******* is * ****** **** **** Hikvision *** *** ***** to **** *******.

H.265/Smart *.***+ ***** ** *** ** ********

******* ** *****'* *** products **** [**** ** longer *********] **** **** the *** ******* **** *** ******* H.265 / ***** *.***+ (*****'* smart *****) ** ******** to *.***. *** ** recorders **** **** ******* H.265, ***** ***** *** features, **** ** ** output.

Poor ************* **** *****

***** ******** **** **** **** that ******* *********** **** move **** *** **** clearly ************, ******* **** unsure *** ** ***** or ******* ******** ** their *********.

***** **** **** **** to "***** ** ***** ***’* official *******", ***** ******** no ********* ** ***** changes ** ** **** publication.

New ****** *********

*** ****** **** **** under * *** ****** convention,******** ****, ***** ******* * more *********** ******. **** new ********** ** **** more ******* *** ****** be ****** ***** ******* but ***** ** ********* for ********* ** ******* cross-reference *********** ****** ** the *** ******.

Customer ******

********* **** **** ***** the **** ** ******** and ****** ***** ** cameras are ****** ** **** that *** ****** **** are ******** **** **** soon ** ******** **** new ******, ******* **** to ****** *** ******* of ********** *******.

***** *** ***** ** indication ** *** **** the *** ****** **** be *********, *** *********** are **** **** ** get *** ** *** stock *******. **** ****** customers ***** ****** ******** *********** forced ** ****** ***** up, ** ****** ******.

New *** ********* ***** *.*** ****

******* ****** ** *********, such ** *** ** ******* pro-series *****-**** ******** [**** no ****** *********] *** ***** H.264 ****, **** ** mention ** *.*** *******.

H.265 ******* **********, *** ******* ******

**** ***** *** ********, Dahua ***** * ******* list ** ************* ******** H.265-capable ******* ** ********* (e.g., *********, *******, *******). VMS ******* *** *.*** is ***** *******, *** more *********** ******* ******** demand *** *.*** *** not **** ****.  

***** *.*** *** ***** to ** **** ** reduce *********, ** ***** at * **** ** increased ****** ******** ******. Meanwhile, ***** *.*** ****** have ***** ** ******* similar, *** ********* ******, bandwidth *******, ******* ********* updates **** *****, ** the **** *** ********** client *********.

Hikvision ******

** *** ******** ****, Dahua *** *** ****** H.265 ** ***** ******** to *.*** (** **** simply ** ** ***** newer). **** ***** *** some ******** ** ********* to ***** *.*** ***** they **** ******* *** done ******* ** ***** today, ******** ** ******.***+ ************ *** ********* *********** bandwidth / ******* ******* on *** ***.

Dahua *** ** ***** **** *******

**** **** ***** ***** does *** **** * solid ************* ** *** their ******** ****** ********. ******* line ********* **** **** are **** ****** ** China, ***** ********* ****** to **** *** ****** technologies *********** *********, **** if ******* ************ *** minimal. ** *** ** and ******, ********* ***** value ********* **** **** incremental ******* ********* *** find ******* **** **** **********.

Comments (25)

H.265 licensing is extremely expensive. In some cases orders of magnitude more expensive than H.264. MPEG-LA and HEVC.

Google Microsoft, Amazon, Netflix, Cisco, Mozilla and others are developing a royalty free alternative (under the name "Alliance for Open Media"). VP9 is where the camera community should be moving to, not H.265.

H.265 licensing is extremely expensive.

Are you saying this based on historical information, or do you think the newer licensing structure is also extremely expensive?

From our discussion with the CEO of the HEVC Alliance, it seems like the costs to implement H.265 support in cameras and recorders/VMS should not be a massively limiting factor.

The license is $.80 per device for units shipped into the US and other Region 1 countries, and $.40 for Region 2 countries.

If you owe less than $25,000 in license fees (roughly 30,000 units of hardware or software channels) you are exempt from having to pay the license fee.

This still does not sound "extremely expensive" in the grand scheme of things, though certainly more expensive than free if you are shipping enough units to actually owe fees.

The last major tech discussion I read on VP9 (admittedly several months ago), people were still saying that a full specification had not been publicly released, making it impractical for companies to actually implement VP9 in their products independently now. Has this changed?

H.265 is available for use immediately, as we have seen in cameras and VMS support. It has other limitations, but it is at least something that can be implemented.

In Netflix's test of H.265 vs VP9, they found H.265 to be 20% more efficient. For security users this would mean reduced storage costs for video, which would mitigate some (or all) of the higher license fees incurred from using H.265.

This still does not sound "extremely expensive" in the grand scheme of things...

Though you still need to add in the MPEG-LA 265 royalties, which are higher than the MPEG-LA 264 royalties.

This really gets my goat, as they say. We've asked, begged, pleaded with manufacturers like Dahua to use more reputable and preferably Western or Japanese technology companies, we will pay for it! 80 cents? Are you serious? Use the officially licensed technology... Free over 30,000 units? Then there is no reason not to do so other than ulterior motives (China only supports China, and they want to perpetuate China China China everywhere)

HiSilicon? Grain Media? Why not use T.I. or Intel- the marketing value of these names is worth the measly increase in price. Ulterior motives is why. It displays a lack of respect and partnership with Western Companies.

China is constantly replying with things like "it is ok, we think" and then they deny/ignore until you forget or give up. Well we don't think that... and we're the consumer. We're also Westerners that know the western market... which is NOTHING like China, so why wouldn't you value inside information/insight? Ulterior motives is why. If China continues to spread it's own ideas and ways of life instead of collaborating and cooperating and improving then it will ruin everything it touches, because they don't compromise and they don't respect anything but money. Even if they all stayed domestic and continued doing business only in China the whole Earth is at risk because their pollution is carried away by the wind and the oceans.

One last point on the Ulterior Motives angle, why would Tesla cars have a 30% tax? Not because it is "Advanced Technology" as they state, it is to protect Chinese electric car makers. The most recent currency manipulation might not seem important to the average American, but if you do the math it is a deceitful way of taxing American goods coming into their country, and making their products more expensive to us- and what alternative do we actually have? Again, Ulterior Motives.

Americans better wake up and read before they wake up Chinese. This isn't sinophobia or racism, this is economics. We've been engaged in a Financial war for quite some time now. Why the WTO doesn't wake up and act is beyond me.

We've asked, begged, pleaded with manufacturers like Dahua to use more reputable and preferably Western or Japanese technology companies, we will pay for it!

What does this mean? Why would Dahua want to use anyone but themselves?

I mean the components they use, the microprocessors.

.

Indepdendent testing by Netflix:

VP9 in green.

Native browser support does not exist for h.265 which is a huge problem for camera setup and the future of video.

I'd disagree with that. Most cameras use JPEG in the web interface anyway, even today. To get H.264, you almost always need to use ActiveX or other plugins, with few exceptions. So considering it hasn't stopped anyone from using H.264 cameras, apparently, I would expect the same for 265.

So you are satisfied with JPEG in the browser for all your streaming video needs? Browser video codec support is transitioning technologies and WebRTC is the future for native browser support for video codecs. If H.265 was going to be supported by WebRTC then I might feel differently.

No, not all my streaming video needs, but for setup it has worked fine with few exceptions. It would be ideal if 264/265 were properly supported without plugins, but my point is that it has not been a showstopper in surveillance.

My opinion is in the context of "what's the best technology choice for the future of video surveillance" and not "what are acceptable alternatives." Otherwise, your point is valid.

Then why won't anyone embrace HTML5?

Camera or VMS support for HTML5?

I would prefer HTML5 for IPC web interface and video streaming, eliminate ActiveX completely in all cases.

WebRTC is based on HTML but unfortunately Dahua went H.265 and can not take advantage of it now.

Dahua went H.265 and can not take advantage of it now.

They are still supporting H.264, so they can work with webRTC browsers for the scenarios where that matters.

All hikvision and dahua high end nvr use Intel 

question is why the secrecy 

This is straight out of the Chinese Business School: Sell a ton of product to their "trusted & valued partners", load them up with tons of old/dead stock and then release the new product, and in the case of Dahua and Hik: sell the new stuff direct to consumer. Shameful.

Also, how long had they been advertising H.265? I think the release has been delayed by a year maybe.

You state in the article that Hikvision haven't embraced H.265 yet. Well as the attached article from Hikvision Europe shows I think that is about to change.

http://www.hikvisioneurope.com/eu/hik/news/

Good find. I never believed Hik's BS about h.265, it was an obvious stall tactic.

Is h265 more hype than reality

if it's on anything below a 4 k camera

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Bandwidth

Pelco Sarix Pro3 Camera Tested on Oct 16, 2019
Pelco has released their Sarix Professional Series 3 cameras, claiming "more security detail in challenging scenes with excellent low light and...
Last Chance - Register Now - October 2019 IP Networking Course on Oct 10, 2019
Last Chance - Register Now - Fall 2019 IP Networking Course. The course starts next week. This is the only networking course designed...
'Bunker Busting' Wireless Access Startup: Sure-Fi Profile on Oct 03, 2019
An access startup is claiming its 'bunker busting' wireless Wiegand radios can punch through 'any obstruction'. We examine their offering,...
Vivotek 4K S-Series Camera Tested on Sep 30, 2019
Vivotek's highest-end S-series camera claims "Supreme Night Visibility", "Smart IR II", "Smart Stream II", "WDR Pro for unparalleled visibility in...
Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...
Proactive CCTV "Only Affordable Video Archiving Solution" Profile on Aug 12, 2019
Proactive CCTV is claiming to offer "the only affordable video archiving solution on the market", reducing the storage typically required for H.265...
Hikvision 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 02, 2019
With their latest Smart Series 5 cameras, Hikvision is claiming cameras "fully loaded" with "state-of-the-art technology for high performance and...
Avigilon ACC7 VMS Tested on Jul 22, 2019
Avigilon's Control Center 7 boldly claims it will "transform live video monitoring" with the new Focus of Attention "AI-enabled" interface. We...
History of Video Surveillance on Jul 19, 2019
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to ab emerging AI cloud era.  The goal of this history is to...
Last Chance - Camera Course Summer 2019 on Jul 11, 2019
Last day to register is Thursday, July 11, 2019. This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Hikvision CEO And Vice-Chair Under PRC Government Investigation on Nov 14, 2019
In a surprising and globally covered move, Hikvision CEO Hu Yangzhong and Vice-Chairman Gong Hongjia are being investigated by China's securities...
Camera Field of View (FoV) Guide on Nov 13, 2019
Field of View (FoV) and Angle of View (AoV), are deceptively complex. At their most basic, they simply describe what the camera can "see" and seem...
UK Big Brother Watch: Hikvision Is 'Morally Bankrupt' on Nov 13, 2019
UK civil liberties advocate Big Brother Watch has condemned Hikvision as being 'morally bankrupt' following IPVM exposing Hikvision marketing...
Color Low Light Mega Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Speco, Sony, Vivotek on Nov 12, 2019
This is the biggest color low light shootout ever, testing 20+ super low light models from 10 manufacturers: Increasingly, each manufacturer...
Wireless / WiFi Access Lock Guide on Nov 12, 2019
For some access openings, running wires can add thousands in cost, and wireless alternatives that avoid it becomes appealing. But using wireless...
Hikvision Markets Uyghur Ethnicity Analytics, Now Covers Up on Nov 11, 2019
Hikvision has marketed an AI camera that automatically identifies Uyghurs, on its China website, only covering it up days ago after IPVM questioned...
Open vs End-to-End Systems: Integrator Statistics 2019 on Nov 11, 2019
Preference for open systems is on the decline, according to new IPVM statistics. We asked integrators: For video surveillance systems, do you...
Biggest Low Light Problems 2019 on Nov 08, 2019
Over 150 integrators responded to our survey question: "What are the biggest problems you face getting good low-light images?" Inside, we share...
US Issues Criminal Charges For Fraudulently Selling Hikvision And Other China Products on Nov 07, 2019
The US government has made an unprecedented move on the video surveillance supply chain, charging a US company, Aventura for "having conspired with...
The Access Control Codes Guide: IBC, NFPA 72, 80 & 101 on Nov 07, 2019
For access, there is one basic maxim: Life safety above all else. But how do you know if all applicable codes are being followed? While the...