H.265 Licensing Fees Examined / CEO Interview

Author: Brian Karas, Published on Jul 14, 2016

Axis has repeatedly warned about H.265 licensing, most recently:

[The H.265 license model] includes a royalty on revenues generated on the content developed by any HEVC-enabled device. This royalty on content has prompted strong backlash

Is this true?

We spoke with the CEO of HEVC AdvancePeter Moller, the licensing company representing H.265 patent holders, to better understand H.265 licensing for security devices.

In this report, we examine why Axis is wrong, and break down the details of how H.265 licensing will apply to the video surveillance industry.

**** *** ********** ****** ***** *.*** *********, ************:

[*** *.*** ******* *****] ******** * ******* ** ******** ********* on *** ******* ********* ** *** ****-******* ******. **** ******* on ******* *** ******** ****** ********

** **** ****?

** ***** **** *** *** ****** ************ ******, *** ********* ******* ************ *.*** ****** *******, ** ****** ********** *.*** licensing *** ******** *******.

** **** ******, ** ******* *** **** ** *****, *** break **** *** ******* ** *** *.*** ********* **** ***** to *** ***** ************ ********.

[***************]

0.5% ******* *** **********

*** **** ******* ********** *** *.*% ******* ******* ******** ** ******** ****, ***** ******* ******* ******** ** **** *****. ** ******* *** ******* ** the ******** *** **** *****, ***** *** *** ** ****** * **** *********** ** H.265 ********** **** ********.

**** *.*% *** *** ********** ******** ** ** ******* ** companies **** *******. ** *** ********* ******* ***, ** **, **** fee ***** ***** ** ***** *********, ***** *** *** **** a ***-****** ******, *** *** **** ***-****** ******* *************.

*********** ** **** *** ****** ***** ** ********* *** *********** about ***** ********* ********* **** *** ********* ******** *****.

**** ****** *** **** ********** *******, *** ********** ** ********

***** **** ******** ******* ** *** ********** ** *** ******* requirements, **** ****** **** ***** *****, ********* *** ***. ** ************ ***** ***** *****-***** ********* *** ***** ********-******* ************, and **** ******** **** ***** ******* ** ******** ****** ***** were ********** "***-********** *****" *** *** ********** ** *** ********* **** beyond *** ******-**** ******* *** *** ******* ******* (********* *****).

Licensing *** ******** *** ********

*** **** ******* ******** ***-**** **** *** ******** *******, ** ******** installations, that ********* ** *.*** ******* ***/** ******* ********. ***** **** into **** ** ******* ** *** "********* **** *** ***** Devices" ********. ** ** * ***-**** ***, *** ** ***** on *** ******* *** ******* ***** **, ********** ** ***** it ** ************.

******** ******* **** ****** * *********, ***** *** ***** ** the ***** *****, *** * *** $*.** ***.  ****** * countries, ***** *** *** *** ****** ** ****** *, **** a *** $*.**/****** ***.  

***** ****** * ****** *** ******** ** *** ****** *** security, ********** ****** * ********* ******* *****, ******, *****, ****** and ***** ******. *******, ******** **** ** ***** *** **** sold **, *.*., *** ** ** ** ***** ***** *** higher ****** * ****.

*** ********* **** *** ***** ******* ******** *** * ******* ****** license *** ** ***$**,***,***.

******** ****** ********* *******

******* *** * ****** ******* ***, ********** ** ****. ** ************ ***** ***** *****-****** ******** ******* *** **** ******** these **** ***** * ****** ***, **** ** **** ******* multiple *******, ******** *******, ***** *******, ** *** ***** *******.

******** ******** ********* *******

********* ** *** ***, *** ********* ***** *** * ******* *** *** ******** server, ********** ** ****** ** ********* *******, ** ********* *******.  

*** ******* ***** **** ** *.*** ******* ******** ** ***** ********, would ******* * ******** ******* *** **** ****** ************. **** it *** ******* *** **** *** ****** ******** ** ********* license-free **** *** ************, *** ************* *** *** ****** *******, the *** ********* ***** *** ** *********** ******* *** ****** "** *** *****, ** ***** **** ** **** ***** ** find * ********** *** ******** ********."

First **,*** ******* ******** *** ****

********* ****** *** **** ********* ********** ** * ********* "******** owing ********* ** **** **** $**,*** ******** ** *** **** to ******* * ******* *********, ******* ** ******* **********".  ****, in *******, ***** **** *** ****** ************ (***** ********* **** than ~**,*** ******* ********) ***** *** *** *** *.*** ********* fees *** ******** *******.

Caveats ** *** *******

**** ********* ** **** ****** ********* ******-**** *******, ** ***** are **** **** ******* ********* ** "** **********" ***** *** companies ************ *.*** ****/****** ********, *** ********** *** **** ******* logo ** ******* *********. ****** **** *** ***** *** ********* that ********* ********** ******** ** ********, ** *** ********** ***-********* for ***** *******.

******* ******* ****** *** ** ******** *.*** ********

***** **** *************, **** ** *********, ************* ************** *** ******* **** (*** ******* ****) ** *.*** ******** to *.***, ***** ****** ** ** ******** ***** *** ** when ***** **** *** **********, ** **** *** ***** ***** will **. ************, ******** *********, ******* ***** *****-****** ** **-**** installed *************, ****** *** **** ************* ** ********* ********* **** for ************ *.*** ******** ** ******** ************* ** ***** ********, as *** **** ******* *** **** ** ***** ***** *** ** license **** *** ********* ******** ****** *****.

** ***** ********* ************* *** *** ******* ** *.*** ********* requirements *** ***** ******** ** ******* **** ******* ** **** questions ** *** ******** *** ** *** ****.

*** ** **** *****, ***** ****** *** *.*** ******** ******, e.g., ******* (****** **** ** ** ********** *** *******) *** H.264 ***** ****** ***** * ****** ****** ********** ******* **** to ******* / *** *.***.

Comments (6)

Not surprising that HEVC Advance didn't mention their competitor the MPEG LA.

But the MPEG LA is the company that handles h.264 royalties today and is also the company who had the first patent portfolio for h.265. HEVC Advance was actually born of the discontent of some of the MPEG LA manufacturers.

In any event, the quandary is that buying a license from one does not mean one does not need one from another.

We appreciate Brian reaching out to HEVC Advance and taking the time to get the facts for IPVM Members. The issue of MPEG LA wasn't raised during the conversation. Please note that we don’t view MPEG LA as a competitor but rather as a complementary patent pool administrator. Our programs are quite distinct and while I hope patent owners join our program to the extent that such patent owners believe the MPEG LA program better meets their needs I hope they join MPEG LA. HEVC Advance was, in fact, born because many key patent owners did not believe that MPEG LA provided a ‘product’ that meet the needs of both patent owners and patent users and thus would not provide a long term solution to the market place. We believe that HEVC Advance does provide that balance. And while having two patents pools might not be as efficient as having one patent pool, it is almost certainly far more efficient than having to execute multiple bilateral license deals.
Pete Moller
CEO
HEVC Advance

Thanks Peter.

Does joining one patent pool excuse one from joining the other? Will some/most need to join both?

What are, in your opinion, the ramifications of Technicolor exiting both pools? Does this create a third entity to pay?

Each patent pool generally offers a license to a different set of essential patents. So to the extent a company determines it needs a license to both of those separate sets of patents then yes, they would need to join both patent pools. I would note that HEVC Advance has offered the opportunity for all of the MPEG LA licensors to join the HEVC Advance patent pool with no change in our royalty rate structure. If that was to happen then companies would only need to join the HEVC Advance patent pool to obtain a license to both sets of patents.

Concerning Technicolor, please note that Technicolor did not exit both pools, rather Technicolor did not join either pool. That is, they were never a licensor in either pool. I believe the ramifications of Technicolor not being a licensor in either pool is negligible. It is my understanding that Technicolor has a relatively modest portfolio of essential patents, so IF they sought licenses from companies in this market category and IF companies determined they needed a license to those patents, then I would expect the royalty rate would also be modest. In any event, the licensing group at Technicolor is a professional organization and I have no doubt that they will act responsibly and not hinder adoption of HEVC technology. And who knows, maybe they will reconsider and decide to join either HEVC Advance or MPEG LA in the future.

Concerning Technicolor, please note that Technicolor did not exit both pools, rather Technicolor did not join either pool. That is, they were never a licensor in either pool. I believe the ramifications of Technicolor not being a licensor in either pool is negligible.

Thanks Peter.

I was asking because of their own press release, which contains a fair amount of puffing:

TECHNICOLOR WITHDRAWS FROM THE HEVC ADVANCE POOL TO ENABLE DIRECT LICENSING OF ITS HEVC IP PORTFOLIO

Very Informative article.

Much thanks for this update.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Magos Radar Company Profile on Nov 12, 2018
Magos America General Manager Yaron Zussman admits when he first came across Magos, he asked himself: "What's innovative about radar?" Be that as...
Axis 2N Intercom Tested on Nov 08, 2018
Axis expanded its video intercom business buying Czech-based 2N in 2016. Despite competing against owner Axis' intercoms, 2N recently registered as...
Dahua Dual Imager Dome Camera Tested (HDBW4231FN-E2-M) on Nov 07, 2018
Dahua has introduced a dual-imager dome model, the HDBW4231FN-E2-M, with two independently positionable sensors including integrated IR, not found...
Avigilon Opens Up Analytics And Cameras on Nov 06, 2018
Avigilon is opening up. The company historically famous for advocating its own end-to-end solutions and making it harder for 3rd parties to...
Worst Products on Nov 03, 2018
Security integrators periodically report on their favorite and worst products to IPVM. These are known integrators who IPVM pays to answer surveys....
Unisight Company Profile on Nov 01, 2018
Hikvision's largest US OEM, LTS has started to carry Unisight, whose products (shown below) look a lot like Hikvision's rival Dahua: Who is...
Cloud Video Storage Usage 2018 on Oct 31, 2018
Storing email and documents in the cloud have long been common, with on-site email or file servers increasingly eliminated. However, what about...
VMS Camera Management Shootout - Avigilon, Dahua, Exacq, Genetec, Hanwha, Hikvision, Milestone, Network Optix on Oct 29, 2018
Camera setup, configuration and maintenance are the most common tasks when managing a surveillance system. Who does it best and worst? Who offers...
Axxon Face Search Tested on Oct 26, 2018
AxxonSoft has brought facial recognition to their Axxon Next VMS for free with the simply named Face Search, claiming to allow users to find...
Exacq Co-Founders Return, Start Qumulex on Oct 24, 2018
Exacq co-founders Dan Rittman, Tom Buckley, and David Underwood are back, starting up Qumulex. In 2000, they sold Integral to Andover...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Throughtek P2P/Cloud Solution Profile on Nov 15, 2018
Many IoT manufacturers either do not have the capabilities or the interest to develop their own cloud management software for their devices....
ASIS Offering Custom Research For Manufacturers on Nov 15, 2018
Manufacturers often want to know what industry people think about trends and, in particular, the segments and product they offer.  ASIS and its...
ISC East 2018 Mini-Show Report on Nov 15, 2018
ISC East, by its own admission, is not a national or international show, billed as the "Largest Annual Northeast U.S. Security...
Hikvision Silent on "Bad Architectural Practices" Cybersecurity Report on Nov 14, 2018
A 'significant vulnerability was found in Hikvision cameras' by VDOO, a startup cybersecurity specialist. Hikvision has fixed the specific...
French Government Threatens School with $1.7M Fine For “Excessive Video Surveillance” on Nov 14, 2018
The French government has notified a high-profile Paris coding academy that it risks a fine of up to 1.5 million euros (about $1.7m) if it...
Integrator Credit Card Alternative Divvy on Nov 13, 2018
Most security integrators are small businesses but large enough that they have various employees that need to be able to expense various charges as...
Directory of Video Intercoms on Nov 13, 2018
Video Intercoms, also known as Video Door-Phones or Video Entry Systems, have been growing in the past decade as more and more IP camera...
Beware Amazon Go Store Hype (Tested) on Nov 13, 2018
IPVM's trip to and testing of Amazon Go's San Francisco store shows a number of significant operational and economic issues that undermine the...
Magos Radar Company Profile on Nov 12, 2018
Magos America General Manager Yaron Zussman admits when he first came across Magos, he asked himself: "What's innovative about radar?" Be that as...
Genetec Privacy Protector Tested on Nov 12, 2018
Genetec has built Kiwi Security's Privacy Protector into Security Center, an analytic which anonymizes individuals in cameras' fields of view...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact