H.265 Licensing Fees Examined / CEO Interview

Author: Brian Karas, Published on Jul 14, 2016

Axis has repeatedly warned about H.265 licensing, most recently:

[The H.265 license model] includes a royalty on revenues generated on the content developed by any HEVC-enabled device. This royalty on content has prompted strong backlash

Is this true?

We spoke with the CEO of HEVC AdvancePeter Moller, the licensing company representing H.265 patent holders, to better understand H.265 licensing for security devices.

In this report, we examine why Axis is wrong, and break down the details of how H.265 licensing will apply to the video surveillance industry.

**** *** ********** ****** ***** *.*** *********, ************:

[*** *.*** ******* *****] ******** * ******* ** ******** ********* on *** ******* ********* ** *** ****-******* ******. **** ******* on ******* *** ******** ****** ********

** **** ****?

** ***** **** *** *** ****** ************ ******, *** ********* ******* ************ *.*** ****** *******, ** ****** ********** *.*** licensing *** ******** *******.

** **** ******, ** ******* *** **** ** *****, *** break **** *** ******* ** *** *.*** ********* **** ***** to *** ***** ************ ********.

[***************]

0.5% ******* *** **********

*** **** ******* ********** *** *.*% ******* ******* ******** ** ******** ****, ***** ******* ******* ******** ** **** *****. ** ******* *** ******* ** the ******** *** **** *****, ***** *** *** ** ****** * **** *********** ** H.265 ********** **** ********.

**** *.*% *** *** ********** ******** ** ** ******* ** companies **** *******. ** *** ********* ******* ***, ** **, **** fee ***** ***** ** ***** *********, ***** *** *** **** a ***-****** ******, *** *** **** ***-****** ******* *************.

*********** ** **** *** ****** ***** ** ********* *** *********** about ***** ********* ********* **** *** ********* ******** *****.

**** ****** *** **** ********** *******, *** ********** ** ********

***** **** ******** ******* ** *** ********** ** *** ******* requirements, **** ****** **** ***** *****, ********* *** ***. ** ************ ***** ***** *****-***** ********* *** ***** ********-******* ************, and **** ******** **** ***** ******* ** ******** ****** ***** were ********** "***-********** *****" *** *** ********** ** *** ********* **** beyond *** ******-**** ******* *** *** ******* ******* (********* *****).

Licensing *** ******** *** ********

*** **** ******* ******** ***-**** **** *** ******** *******, ** ******** installations, that ********* ** *.*** ******* ***/** ******* ********. ***** **** into **** ** ******* ** *** "********* **** *** ***** Devices" ********. ** ** * ***-**** ***, *** ** ***** on *** ******* *** ******* ***** **, ********** ** ***** it ** ************.

******** ******* **** ****** * *********, ***** *** ***** ** the ***** *****, *** * *** $*.** ***.  ****** * countries, ***** *** *** *** ****** ** ****** *, **** a *** $*.**/****** ***.  

***** ****** * ****** *** ******** ** *** ****** *** security, ********** ****** * ********* ******* *****, ******, *****, ****** and ***** ******. *******, ******** **** ** ***** *** **** sold **, *.*., *** ** ** ** ***** ***** *** higher ****** * ****.

*** ********* **** *** ***** ******* ******** *** * ******* ****** license *** ** ***$**,***,***.

******** ****** ********* *******

******* *** * ****** ******* ***, ********** ** ****. ** ************ ***** ***** *****-****** ******** ******* *** **** ******** these **** ***** * ****** ***, **** ** **** ******* multiple *******, ******** *******, ***** *******, ** *** ***** *******.

******** ******** ********* *******

********* ** *** ***, *** ********* ***** *** * ******* *** *** ******** server, ********** ** ****** ** ********* *******, ** ********* *******.  

*** ******* ***** **** ** *.*** ******* ******** ** ***** ********, would ******* * ******** ******* *** **** ****** ************. **** it *** ******* *** **** *** ****** ******** ** ********* license-free **** *** ************, *** ************* *** *** ****** *******, the *** ********* ***** *** ** *********** ******* *** ****** "** *** *****, ** ***** **** ** **** ***** ** find * ********** *** ******** ********."

First **,*** ******* ******** *** ****

********* ****** *** **** ********* ********** ** * ********* "******** owing ********* ** **** **** $**,*** ******** ** *** **** to ******* * ******* *********, ******* ** ******* **********".  ****, in *******, ***** **** *** ****** ************ (***** ********* **** than ~**,*** ******* ********) ***** *** *** *** *.*** ********* fees *** ******** *******.

Caveats ** *** *******

**** ********* ** **** ****** ********* ******-**** *******, ** ***** are **** **** ******* ********* ** "** **********" ***** *** companies ************ *.*** ****/****** ********, *** ********** *** **** ******* logo ** ******* *********. ****** **** *** ***** *** ********* that ********* ********** ******** ** ********, ** *** ********** ***-********* for ***** *******.

******* ******* ****** *** ** ******** *.*** ********

***** **** *************, **** ** *********, ************* ************** *** ******* **** (*** ******* ****) ** *.*** ******** to *.***, ***** ****** ** ** ******** ***** *** ** when ***** **** *** **********, ** **** *** ***** ***** will **. ************, ******** *********, ******* ***** *****-****** ** **-**** installed *************, ****** *** **** ************* ** ********* ********* **** for ************ *.*** ******** ** ******** ************* ** ***** ********, as *** **** ******* *** **** ** ***** ***** *** ** license **** *** ********* ******** ****** *****.

** ***** ********* ************* *** *** ******* ** *.*** ********* requirements *** ***** ******** ** ******* **** ******* ** **** questions ** *** ******** *** ** *** ****.

*** ** **** *****, ***** ****** *** *.*** ******** ******, e.g., ******* (****** **** ** ** ********** *** *******) *** H.264 ***** ****** ***** * ****** ****** ********** ******* **** to ******* / *** *.***.

Comments (6)

Not surprising that HEVC Advance didn't mention their competitor the MPEG LA.

But the MPEG LA is the company that handles h.264 royalties today and is also the company who had the first patent portfolio for h.265. HEVC Advance was actually born of the discontent of some of the MPEG LA manufacturers.

In any event, the quandary is that buying a license from one does not mean one does not need one from another.

We appreciate Brian reaching out to HEVC Advance and taking the time to get the facts for IPVM Members. The issue of MPEG LA wasn't raised during the conversation. Please note that we don’t view MPEG LA as a competitor but rather as a complementary patent pool administrator. Our programs are quite distinct and while I hope patent owners join our program to the extent that such patent owners believe the MPEG LA program better meets their needs I hope they join MPEG LA. HEVC Advance was, in fact, born because many key patent owners did not believe that MPEG LA provided a ‘product’ that meet the needs of both patent owners and patent users and thus would not provide a long term solution to the market place. We believe that HEVC Advance does provide that balance. And while having two patents pools might not be as efficient as having one patent pool, it is almost certainly far more efficient than having to execute multiple bilateral license deals.
Pete Moller
CEO
HEVC Advance

Thanks Peter.

Does joining one patent pool excuse one from joining the other? Will some/most need to join both?

What are, in your opinion, the ramifications of Technicolor exiting both pools? Does this create a third entity to pay?

Each patent pool generally offers a license to a different set of essential patents. So to the extent a company determines it needs a license to both of those separate sets of patents then yes, they would need to join both patent pools. I would note that HEVC Advance has offered the opportunity for all of the MPEG LA licensors to join the HEVC Advance patent pool with no change in our royalty rate structure. If that was to happen then companies would only need to join the HEVC Advance patent pool to obtain a license to both sets of patents.

Concerning Technicolor, please note that Technicolor did not exit both pools, rather Technicolor did not join either pool. That is, they were never a licensor in either pool. I believe the ramifications of Technicolor not being a licensor in either pool is negligible. It is my understanding that Technicolor has a relatively modest portfolio of essential patents, so IF they sought licenses from companies in this market category and IF companies determined they needed a license to those patents, then I would expect the royalty rate would also be modest. In any event, the licensing group at Technicolor is a professional organization and I have no doubt that they will act responsibly and not hinder adoption of HEVC technology. And who knows, maybe they will reconsider and decide to join either HEVC Advance or MPEG LA in the future.

Concerning Technicolor, please note that Technicolor did not exit both pools, rather Technicolor did not join either pool. That is, they were never a licensor in either pool. I believe the ramifications of Technicolor not being a licensor in either pool is negligible.

Thanks Peter.

I was asking because of their own press release, which contains a fair amount of puffing:

TECHNICOLOR WITHDRAWS FROM THE HEVC ADVANCE POOL TO ENABLE DIRECT LICENSING OF ITS HEVC IP PORTFOLIO

Very Informative article.

Much thanks for this update.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Directory of Video Surveillance Startups on Jul 18, 2018
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known entity...
Axis ~$100 Camera Tested on Jul 17, 2018
Axis has released their lowest cost camera ever, the Companion Eye Mini L, setting their sights on a market dominated by Hikvision and Dahua. Can...
Axis Perimeter Defender Video Analytics Tested on Jul 12, 2018
Axis 'high security' video analytics offering is Perimeter Defender, OEMed / developed with Digital Barriers. But how good is Perimeter Defender?...
Drops Dahua, Fenner Becomes ISS CMO on Jul 09, 2018
Hired to improve Dahua's miserable marketing just last year, Janet Fenner has quit Dahua, joining VMS manufacturer ISS as Chief Marketing...
UK VSaaS Startup Ocucon on Jul 03, 2018
Decreasing exposure to fraudulent slip-and-fall insurance claims and lawsuits is one of the oldest selling points of video surveillance for retail....
Digital Watchdog Low Cost 4MP Camera Tested on Jul 02, 2018
Based on member 4MP testing requests, we bought and tested Digital Watchdog's low-cost 4MP DWC-MTT4Wi to see how it performs in real world scenes,...
Camio Wins 24,000 Camera AI VSaaS Customer on Jun 29, 2018
Silicon Valley Artificial Intelligent VSaaS startup Camio has announced it has won a 24,000 camera deal, a sizeable system for a small...
Panoramic Fisheye Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Oncam And Vivotek on Jun 27, 2018
IPVM tested Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Oncam And Vivotek 12MP panoramic fisheye cameras head to head, as shown in the test setup...
Snap Surveillance Profile on Jun 26, 2018
There are not a lot of video surveillance companies that survive 9 years with only one feature that makes their product stand out. In the case of...
OpenEye Apex VMS Tested on Jun 26, 2018
OpenEye is a US company, founded nearly 20 years ago. In the past few years, OpenEye has been one of a few VMS providers that have pivoted to being...

Most Recent Industry Reports

AI Startup Anyvision Raises $28 Million Led By Bosch on Jul 20, 2018
Anyvision is the most ambitious heavy-spending video surveillance startup in many years. And, now, the startup has raised $28 million led by...
Fail: Dahua "Didn't Check The Lux Levels but It Was Dark" on Jul 20, 2018
Dahua UK has been promoting their camera quality on LinkedIn: I, and others, asked what the lux level of the scene was. (background: Lux Rating...
Free 100+ Manufacturer-Customized Camera Calculator Released on Jul 19, 2018
Now, any manufacturer has a customized IPVM Camera Calculator, free. The goal is to make it easier for companies to help their customers better...
Improved Security And Surveillance Bidding - 2018 MasterFormat Divisions Examined) on Jul 19, 2018
Navigating the world of system specifications and bidding work can be complex and confusing, but a standard format exists, and understanding it...
Last Chance - Security Sales Course Summer 2018 on Jul 19, 2018
Today is the last day to register. Based on member's interest, IPVM is offering a security sales course this summer. Register Now - IPVM Security...
Directory of Video Surveillance Startups on Jul 18, 2018
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known entity...
Ladder Lockdown and Ladder Levelizer Tested on Jul 18, 2018
Ladders are a daily necessity for surveillance and security installers, but working on an unstable surface can be extremely dangerous. In addition...
FST Fails on Jul 17, 2018
FST was one of the hottest startups of the decade, selected as the best new product at ISC West 2011 and backed with tens of millions in...
Axis ~$100 Camera Tested on Jul 17, 2018
Axis has released their lowest cost camera ever, the Companion Eye Mini L, setting their sights on a market dominated by Hikvision and Dahua. Can...
Amazon Ring Alarm System Tested on Jul 16, 2018
Amazon Ring is going to hurt traditional dealers, and especially ADT, new IPVM test results of Ring's Alarm system underscore. IPVM found that...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact