H.265 Licensing Fees Examined / CEO Interview

Author: Brian Karas, Published on Jul 14, 2016

Axis has repeatedly warned about H.265 licensing, most recently:

[The H.265 license model] includes a royalty on revenues generated on the content developed by any HEVC-enabled device. This royalty on content has prompted strong backlash

Is this true?

We spoke with the CEO of HEVC Advance, Peter Moller, the licensing company representing H.265 patent holders, to better understand H.265 licensing for security devices.

In this report, we examine why Axis is wrong, and break down the details of how H.265 licensing will apply to the video surveillance industry.

**** *** ********** ****** ***** *.*** *********, ************:

[*** *.*** ******* *****] ******** * ******* ** ******** ********* on *** ******* ********* ** *** ****-******* ******. **** ******* on ******* *** ******** ****** ********

** **** ****?

** ***** **** *** *** ****** *******,***** ******, *** ********* ******* ************ *.*** ****** *******, ** ****** understand *.*** ********* *** ******** *******.

** **** ******, ** ******* *** **** ** *****, *** break **** *** ******* ** *** *.*** ********* **** ***** to *** ***** ************ ********.

[***************]

0.5% ******* *** **********

*** **** ***************** *** *.*% ******* *************** ** ******** ****, ***** ************** ******** ** **** *****. ** ******* *** ******* ** the******** *** **** *****, ***** *** *** ** ****** * **** *********** ** H.265 ********** **** ********.

**** *.*% *** *** ********** ******** ** ** ******* ** companies **** *******. ** *** ********* ******* ***, ** **, this *** ***** ***** ** ***** *********, ***** *** *** have * ***-****** ******, *** *** **** ***-****** ******* *************.

*********** ** **** *** ****** ***** ** ********* *** *********** about ***** ********* ********* **** *** ********* ******** *****.

**** ****** *** **** ********** *******, *** ********** ** ********

***** **** ******** ******* ** *** ********** ** *** ******* requirements, **** ****** **** ***** *****, ********* *** ***.** ************ ***** ***** *****-***** ********* *** ***** ********-******* ************, and **** ******** **** ***** ******* ** ******** ****** ***** were ********** "***-********** *****" *** *** ********** ** *** ********* fees ****** *** ******-**** ******* *** *** ******* ******* (********* below).

Licensing *** ******** *** ********

*** **** ******* ******** ***-**** **** *** ******** *******, ** software *************, **** ********* ** *.*** ******* ***/** ******* ********. These **** **** **** ** ******* ** *** "********* **** and ***** *******" ********. ** ** * ***-**** ***, *** is ***** ** *** ******* *** ******* ***** **, ********** of ***** ** ** ************.

******** ******* **** ****** * *********, ***** *** ***** ** the ***** *****, *** * *** $*.** ***. ****** * countries, ***** *** *** *** ****** ** ****** *, **** a *** $*.**/****** ***.

***** ****** * ****** *** ******** ** *** ****** *** security, ********** ****** * ********* ******* *****, ******, *****, ****** and ***** ******. *******, ******** **** ** ***** *** **** sold **, *.*., *** ** ** ** ***** ***** *** higher ****** * ****.

*** ********* **** *** ***** ******* ******** *** * ******* annual ******* *** ** ***$**,***,***.

******** ****** ********* *******

******* *** * ****** ******* ***, ********** ** ****.** ************ ***** ***** *****-****** ******** ******* *** **** ******** these **** ***** * ****** ***, **** ** **** ******* multiple *******, ******** *******, ***** *******, ** *** ***** *******.

******** ******** ********* *******

********* ** *** ***, *** ********* ***** *** * ******* fee *** ******** ******, ********** ** ****** ** ********* *******, or ********* *******.

*** ******* ***** **** ** *.*** ******* ******** ** ***** software, ***** ******* * ******** ******* *** **** ****** ************. When ** *** ******* *** **** *** ****** ******** ** typically *******-**** **** *** ************, *** ************* *** *** ****** tracked, *** *** ********* ***** *** ** *********** ******* *** stated "** *** *****, ** ***** **** ** **** ***** ** find * ********** *** ******** ********."

First **,*** ******* ******** *** ****

********* ****** *** **** ********* ********** ** * ********* "******** owing ********* ** **** **** $**,*** ******** ** *** **** to ******* * ******* *********, ******* ** ******* **********". ****, in *******, ***** **** *** ****** ************ (***** ********* **** than ~**,*** ******* ********) ***** *** *** *** *.*** ********* fees *** ******** *******.

Caveats ** *** *******

**** ********* ** **** ****** ********* ******-**** *******, ** ***** are **** **** ******* ********* ** "** **********" ***** *** companies ************ *.*** ****/****** ********, *** ********** *** **** ******* logo ** ******* *********. ****** **** *** ***** *** ********* that ********* ********** ******** ** ********, ** *** ********** ***-********* for ***** *******.

******* ******* ****** *** ** ******** *.*** ********

***** **** *************, **** ** *********, ************* ************** *** ******* **** (*** ******* ****) ** *.*** ******** to *.***, ***** ****** ** ** ******** ***** *** ** when ***** **** *** **********, ** **** *** ***** ***** will **. ************, ******** *********, ******* ***** *****-****** ** **-**** installed *************, ****** *** **** ************* ** ********* ********* **** for ************ *.*** ******** ** ******** ************* ** ***** ********, as *** **** ******* *** **** ** ***** ***** *** no ******* **** *** ********* ******** ****** *****.

** ***** ********* ************* *** *** ******* ** *.*** ********* requirements *** ***** ******** ** ******* **** ******* ** **** questions ** *** ******** *** ** *** ****.

*** ** **** *****, ***** ****** *** *.*** ******** ******, e.g., ******* (****** **** ** ** ********** *** *******) *** H.264 ***** ****** ***** * ****** ****** ********** ******* **** to ******* / *** *.***.

Comments (6)

Not surprising that HEVC Advance didn't mention their competitor the MPEG LA.

But the MPEG LA is the company that handles h.264 royalties today and is also the company who had the first patent portfolio for h.265. HEVC Advance was actually born of the discontent of some of the MPEG LA manufacturers.

In any event, the quandary is that buying a license from one does not mean one does not need one from another.

We appreciate Brian reaching out to HEVC Advance and taking the time to get the facts for IPVM Members. The issue of MPEG LA wasn't raised during the conversation. Please note that we don’t view MPEG LA as a competitor but rather as a complementary patent pool administrator. Our programs are quite distinct and while I hope patent owners join our program to the extent that such patent owners believe the MPEG LA program better meets their needs I hope they join MPEG LA. HEVC Advance was, in fact, born because many key patent owners did not believe that MPEG LA provided a ‘product’ that meet the needs of both patent owners and patent users and thus would not provide a long term solution to the market place. We believe that HEVC Advance does provide that balance. And while having two patents pools might not be as efficient as having one patent pool, it is almost certainly far more efficient than having to execute multiple bilateral license deals.
Pete Moller
CEO
HEVC Advance

Thanks Peter.

Does joining one patent pool excuse one from joining the other? Will some/most need to join both?

What are, in your opinion, the ramifications of Technicolor exiting both pools? Does this create a third entity to pay?

Each patent pool generally offers a license to a different set of essential patents. So to the extent a company determines it needs a license to both of those separate sets of patents then yes, they would need to join both patent pools. I would note that HEVC Advance has offered the opportunity for all of the MPEG LA licensors to join the HEVC Advance patent pool with no change in our royalty rate structure. If that was to happen then companies would only need to join the HEVC Advance patent pool to obtain a license to both sets of patents.

Concerning Technicolor, please note that Technicolor did not exit both pools, rather Technicolor did not join either pool. That is, they were never a licensor in either pool. I believe the ramifications of Technicolor not being a licensor in either pool is negligible. It is my understanding that Technicolor has a relatively modest portfolio of essential patents, so IF they sought licenses from companies in this market category and IF companies determined they needed a license to those patents, then I would expect the royalty rate would also be modest. In any event, the licensing group at Technicolor is a professional organization and I have no doubt that they will act responsibly and not hinder adoption of HEVC technology. And who knows, maybe they will reconsider and decide to join either HEVC Advance or MPEG LA in the future.

Concerning Technicolor, please note that Technicolor did not exit both pools, rather Technicolor did not join either pool. That is, they were never a licensor in either pool. I believe the ramifications of Technicolor not being a licensor in either pool is negligible.

Thanks Peter.

I was asking because of their own press release, which contains a fair amount of puffing:

TECHNICOLOR WITHDRAWS FROM THE HEVC ADVANCE POOL TO ENABLE DIRECT LICENSING OF ITS HEVC IP PORTFOLIO

Very Informative article.

Much thanks for this update.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

The Fastest Growing Video Surveillance Sales Organization Ever - Verkada on Apr 17, 2019
Verkada has the fastest growing video surveillance sales organization ever. In less than 2 years, they already have more salespeople in the US...
Dahua Repositionable IR Multi-Imager Camera Tested on Apr 16, 2019
Dahua has released their first repositionable multi-imager camera, the Multi-Flex 4x2MP, claiming integrated IR, true WDR, and flexible...
Axis Supports HD Analog on Apr 15, 2019
In 2017, Axis declared 'Everything is IP': Now, in 2019, Axis has released support for HD analog, with their new encoders.  Why the change?...
Alarm.com Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 15, 2019
The once dot com startup has evolved to become a core provider for home security and is now expanding into commercial. In their first entry in...
ISC West 2019 Report on Apr 12, 2019
The IPVM team has finished at the Sands looking at what companies are offering and how they are changing their positioning. See below for 50+...
Spring 2019 50+ New Products Directory on Apr 08, 2019
We are compiling a list of new products for Spring 2019 and have over 50 already. Contrast to Fall 2018 New Products Directory and Spring 2018...
Airship VMS Profile on Apr 03, 2019
Airship has been developing VMS software for over 10 years, however, with no outside investment, and minimal marketing, the company is not well...
Dahua Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 01, 2019
Dahua favorability declined, in IPVM's 2019 integrator favorability series, driven by their backdoors, resulting in mass hacking and US government...
Panasonic Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 27, 2019
Panasonic favorability declined, as the company struggled to find its way amidst a changing market and its ill-timed decision to become a Dahua...
Casino Security Consultant Carl Lindgren Interview on Mar 26, 2019
For more than 20 years, Carl Lindgren worked as a casino surveillance pro, while being active (and sometimes outspoken) on various online video...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Access Control Course Spring 2019 - Last Chance on Apr 19, 2019
This is the last chance to register for the Spring Access Control Course. IPVM offers the most comprehensive access control course in the...
Riser vs Plenum Cabling Explained on Apr 18, 2019
You could be spending twice as much for cable as you need. The difference between 'plenum' rated cable and 'riser' rated cable is subtle, but the...
Verint Victimized By Ransomware on Apr 18, 2019
Verint, which is best known in the physical security industry for video surveillance but has built a sizeable cybersecurity business as well, was...
Milestone Drops IFSEC on Apr 18, 2019
Milestone has dropped out of Europe's largest annual security trade show (IFSEC 2019), telling IPVM that they "have found that IFSEC in EMEA no...
The Fastest Growing Video Surveillance Sales Organization Ever - Verkada on Apr 17, 2019
Verkada has the fastest growing video surveillance sales organization ever. In less than 2 years, they already have more salespeople in the US...
Door Operators Access Control Tutorial on Apr 17, 2019
Doors equipped with door operators, specialty devices that automate opening and closing, tend to be quite complex. The mechanisms needed to...
Securadyne CEO: IPVM 'Entertaining For An Ignorant Few' on Apr 16, 2019
Securadyne's CEO Carey Boethel is unhappy with IPVM's report - Failed Integrator Rollup, Securadyne Sells to Guard Giant Allied. Indeed, he...
Dahua Repositionable IR Multi-Imager Camera Tested on Apr 16, 2019
Dahua has released their first repositionable multi-imager camera, the Multi-Flex 4x2MP, claiming integrated IR, true WDR, and flexible...
Strong ISC West 2019 For Manufacturers But Concerns For 2020 March Move on Apr 16, 2019
ISC West 2019 was strong for manufacturers, according to new IPVM survey results of 100+ manufacturers, consistent with 2018 results. However,...
Axis Supports HD Analog on Apr 15, 2019
In 2017, Axis declared 'Everything is IP': Now, in 2019, Axis has released support for HD analog, with their new encoders.  Why the change?...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact