Dahua Smart H.264+ Tested

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Aug 17, 2016

The smart codec trend continues, with Dahua adding Smart H.264+ to many of their models in new firmware.

In this test we see how it performs and how it compares to Dahua's key competitor Hikvision and their H.264+ smart codec in day and night scenes, both low and high motion.  

For more Smart codec details, readers should see our Smart Codec Guide as well as tests of Axis Zipstream, Hikvision H.264+, Panasonic Smart Coding

*** ***** ***** ***** *********, with ***** ****** ***** H.264+ ** **** ** their ****** ** *** firmware.

** **** **** ** see *** ** ******** and *** ** ******** to *****'* *** ********** Hikvision *** ***** *.***+ smart ***** ** *** *** night ******, **** *** *** high ******.  

*** **** ***** ***** *******, readers ****** *** ******** ***** ***** ** **** ** ***** of **** *********, ********* *.***+, ********* ***** ******

[***************]

*******

***** *.***+ ******* ******** by ** **** ** 90% ** *****, **** lit ****** *** ***** 30% ** **** ******* scenes.

*******, ** *** **** effective ** *****, **** reductions ** **-**%. ************, bandwidth ******** ********* ** high ****** ********* ******, an ***** *** **** in ***** ***** ****** ** have ******.

**** **** ***** *.***+ is ********* **** ** Dahua's ***-***** "***" ******, not ***** ****** **** or ******* *********** ******.

Impact **. *********

***** *.***+ ** *********** *************'* *.***+, **** ***** ******** on ******* ****** ** our *****, ************ * *** advantage ** *********'* ** supported ***** ******.

*******, ********* ****** *.***+ on * ******* ********* of ******* (****** *** current ******), ********* *** cost *** **** *** models.

** ***** ******** **** smart ***** ******* ** **** models, ** **** ******* strengthen ***** ****.

Vs. **** *********

****' ********* ********* ******** ****** ******* savings **** *****'* ***** H.264+, ********** ** *** light *** **** ****** scenes. *******, ***** ****' much ****** ****** *******, this ********** ****** *********** is ******** ** **** a ***** ******.

Firmware ************

** ***** *******, ***** has ******** ***** *.***+ *** their *** ****** *******, mid-range *** *** *** models (**** ** ***** tested ** *** *** ******** *** ********* ** ***** ****-*** 4MP *****. ** **** ***** ***** whether ***** *** ***** to ***** ***** *.***+ to ***** ******, **** as *** **** ** Ultra ***** *** **** update **** ****** **/**** they *******.

***** *** ******** *** firmware **** *****'* ****. Firmware ** ********* ** each ******'* ********** **** (*** *** ******** **** for *******).

No *****: **/*** ****

*************'* *.***+************ ***** ******, *****'* ***** *.***+ has ** ************* ******* other **** **/***, **** below. **** ** ********** ****************** ***** ****** **, ***** ***** *********** of *-***** ******** *** dynamic ***********.

Smart ***** **********

******* ********** **** ***** H.264+ ** **. *** varied **** ***** **% in **** ****** ** ~90% ** *****, **** lit ******, **** ** the ***** *****.

*******, ** * **** high ****** ********* **** (generated ** ***** * stage *****), ******* ******** ************* ***** ***** *.***+, unlike ***** ******, ** well ** ***** ***** codecs we **** ******. **** appears ** ** *** to * ********* ** quality **** *** ***** codec off, *** **** ** other ******* (*** *****).

Visible *******

** **** ******, ***** were little ** ** *********** visible ******* ********** ** Smart *.***+. *** *******, in *** ******* ***** scene *****, *** **** chart *** **** ** the ********** ******* *******. Some ****** ******** *** be **** ** *** pattern ** *** ****** in **** *****, *** no **** ********* *******.

*******, ** *** *** light **** **** ****** scene, ***** ******* *** noticeably ***** **** ***** H.264+ ****** ***, **** smearing ** *** **********, pixelation of *******, *** **** detail *******, **** ** this ***** *****:

 

Versus *********

** ****** ***** *.***+ against*********'* *.***+** ******* ****** ** see *** **** *******.

****** *** ***, *** Dahua *** ******'* ******** were ************* ***** **** its ********* **********, **** Smart *.***+ **** ** and ***. ***** **** performed ** ** ***, ~28-30 ************ ******* (****** turning ***** ***** **).

** *****, ***** *.***+ was **** ********* **** Hikvision's *.***+, **** *****'* bitrate **** **** ****** that ** *********.

*

*******, ** ********* *****, the ***** ******'* ******* increased ** *** **** motion *** ***** ***** with ***** *.***+ **, while *********'* ******* ***** by ~** **/*, ***** an **% ********. **** that ******* ****, *** Dahua ******'* ******* ** still ***** **** *********.

Firmware ****

*** ********* ******** ******** were **** ** **** test:

  • ***** *********: *.***.****.**.*********
  • ********* **-**********-*: *.*.* 

******** *** **** ********* working ** *** ***** HFW44X1S.

Comments (9)

Undisclosed Manufacturer #1

08/17/16 09:28pm

I assume this works by dynamically increasing the GOP for periods when there is no motion. When the camera is in such a period and has not sent an I-frame for some time, and suddenly there is a certain amount of motion then will it break out of this mode and send the next I-frame?

I ask this because I am wondering if smart codecs have any impact on VMS products that have an I-frames only option on their server based VMD.

Avatar

Ethan Ace

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed Manufacturer #1 | 08/17/16 09:32pm

Interesting question. Theoretically, the camera should see the motion and start sending I-frames, so the VMS should resume VMD quickly. We have not directly tested it but we can take a look at it in upcoming tests. We'll be looking at Axis Zipstream 2.0 soon.

Undisclosed Manufacturer #1

In reply to Ethan Ace | 08/17/16 11:53pm

I just tested this with a Hikvision H264+ camera with the H.264+ feature enabled. (I do not have a Dahua smart codec camera)

The answer seems to be that it depends on the amount of motion.

I have the camera staring at a wall and with no motion it is sending an I-frame every 12 or 13 seconds. With lots of motion it sends an I-frame every 3 seconds. If I wave my hand in front of the camera it will send an I-frame much sooner than the 12 seconds, sometimes straight away if the movement is large and fast (but not less than 3 seconds after the last I-frame). However, if I move my hand much more slowly in front of the camera, it doesn't always send an I-frame right away. If the motion is both small and slow then it may still be 12 or 13 seconds before the next I-frame.

Andrew Del Biondo

08/22/16 12:36am

Reducing bandwidth is great but are there any compromises in picture quality when there is scene change? We have found various Dahua IP camera models lately to be no longer viable to record in VBR due to unacceptable compression artefacts. An example, is the DH-IPC-HDBW2320R-ZS. At 1080p resolution, 6 FPS, VBR capped at 1920Kbps and quality 6 the bit rate doesn't kick up when the scene is complex and changing, staying at around 500Kbps, so picture quality is unacceptable. Can IPVM do some tests on this model which include scene change to prove or disprove this issue?

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Andrew Del Biondo | 08/22/16 12:41am

Andrew, what firmware do you have on that IP camera? That would help us isolate if its related to specific firmware release.

Andrew Del Biondo

In reply to John Honovich | 08/22/16 01:01am

Firmware: : 2.400.0000.23.R, build : 2015-12-15

I have an internal test report I can email you with more detail. Please let know what email address to send it to.

Undisclosed #2

IPVMU Certified | 10/05/16 07:32pm

Ethan, what was the client used for this test?

There is a claim that Dahua h.264+ requires an update to their NVRs as well as the cameras to work. I assume that non-Dahuan gear wouldn't work therefore. Can you confirm or deny?

Avatar

Ethan Ace

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed #2 | 10/05/16 08:24pm

It was tested with multiple VMSes. Exacq, Milestone, Genetec, no issues with any. I did not try it with the Dahua Smart PSS client or an NVR, but I can look at it.

Robert Shih

Independent
In reply to Ethan Ace | 10/05/16 09:39pm

Man, I'm not even sure anymore. I can copy paste where I got the confusion from in my QQ conversation if you want?

Edit: Screw it. Here's my source from a QQ conversation back on 09/23.

"潇魈撒哈辣 11:46:57 AM
As to the H.264+ technology, it is especially developed by Dahua, so you need to match with dahua specific NVR series during the use, or the H.264+ function is not available. Currently, your NVR3XX series can support H.264+, your 3MP/4MP cameras can also support H.264+
潇魈撒哈辣 11:48:04 AM
the specific FW version that can support h.264+, you can ask Raul for the verison update
BaiginLong 11:55:05 AM
Ahh that's what I was looking for.
BaiginLong 11:56:03 AM
I want the new H.264+ and new IVS time frame for the models I listed earlier, pretty please!
BaiginLong 11:56:10 AM
>^.^<
潇魈撒哈辣 12:05:06 PM
only lite series and eco-savvy series support H.264+, ultra series donot support, so HFW81200E-Z/HDBW81200E-Z, EBW8600, EBW81200 donot support. DSS4004, EVS7048S-R, M70-4U-E, these donot support h.264+, but support h.265
潇魈撒哈辣 12:05:40 PM
BTW, we already have h.265 camera, if customer has the need, let me know
BaiginLong 12:06:05 PM
Will they get updates to support H.264+?
潇魈撒哈辣 12:06:10 PM
ok, gotta to sleep, wish u a good day, talk tommorrow
潇魈撒哈辣 12:06:27 PM
no, don't have this plan
BaiginLong 12:07:02 PM
And btw, I am interested in helping with Dahua marketing for the English sector. Is there anything we can do to make sure the English product descriptions are both appealing and accurate?
潇魈撒哈辣 12:08:23 PM
but theroretically speaking, EVS is just a storage device, just storage what the data it gets from camera, so, it should support H.264+."

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,441 reports, 866 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Video Surveillance History on May 06, 2020
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going...
Leica Launches LIDAR / Thermal / IP Camera on Mar 04, 2020
Swiss manufacturer Leica is launching what it calls a "real-time reality...
Hanwha Wisenet X Plus PTRZ Tested on Feb 14, 2020
Hanwha has released their PTRZ camera, the Wisenet X Plus XNV-6081Z, claiming...
New Axis M30 Cameras Tested on Mar 26, 2020
Axis has released a new generation of, for them, relatively low cost M30...
TVT / InVid White Light Camera Tested Vs Hikvision ColorVu on Mar 18, 2020
With mega China manufacturers Dahua and Hikvision facing both bans and human...
Surveillance Storage 101 on Mar 23, 2020
This guide teaches the fundamentals of video surveillance...
Hanwha Presents AI Analytics and First 8K Camera on May 11, 2020
Hanwha presented their AI Analytics and the "Industry's First 8K" camera at...
VSaaS 101 on Mar 25, 2020
Video Surveillance as a Service (VSaaS) is the common industry term for cloud...
Seek Scan Thermal Temperature Screening System Tested on May 28, 2020
Now that IPVM has tested Dahua, Hikvision, and Sunell, we are returning to...
Video Analytics 101 on Mar 16, 2020
This guide teaches the fundamentals of video surveillance...
Hanwha Face Mask Detection Tested on Jul 01, 2020
Face mask detection or, more specifically lack-of-face-mask detection, is an...
HLC Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Uniview, Vivotek on Mar 02, 2020
Highlight Compensation (HLC) claims to reduce the effects of strong light...
Hikvision Fever Screening Thermal Solutions Examined on Apr 13, 2020
Hikvision is marketing "safer, faster, smarter" with their Fever Screening...
BICSI For IP Video Surveillance Guide on Feb 11, 2020
Spend enough time around networks and eventually someone will mention BICSI,...
Milestone Presents XProtect On AWS on May 04, 2020
Milestone presented its XProtect on AWS offering at the April 2020 IPVM New...

Recent Reports

Dangerous Hikvision Fever Camera Showcased by Chilean City on Aug 07, 2020
Deploying a fever camera outdoors, in the rain, with no black body, is...
"Grand Slam" For Pelco's PE Firm, A Risk For Motorola on Aug 07, 2020
The word "Pelco" and "grand slam" have not been said together for many years....
FLIR Stock Falls, Admits 'Decelerating' Demand For Temperature Screening on Aug 07, 2020
Is the boom going to bust for temperature screening? FLIR disappointed...
VSaaS Will Hurt Integrators on Aug 06, 2020
VSaaS will hurt integrators, there is no question about that. How much...
Dogs For Coronavirus Screening Examined on Aug 06, 2020
While thermal temperature screening is the surveillance industry's most...
ADT Slides Back, Disappointing Results, Poor Commercial Performance on Aug 06, 2020
While ADT had an incredible start to the week, driven by the Google...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all of the...
SIA Coaches Sellers on NDAA 889B Blacklist Workarounds on Aug 05, 2020
Last month SIA demanded that NDAA 899B "must be delayed". Now that they have...
ADI Returns To Growth, Back To 'Pre-COVID Levels' on Aug 05, 2020
While ADI was hit hard in April, with revenue declining 21%, the company's...
Exposing Fever Tablet Suppliers and 40+ Relabelers on Aug 05, 2020
IPVM has found 40+ USA and EU companies relabeling fever tablets designed,...
Indian Government Restricts PRC Manufacturers From Public Projects on Aug 04, 2020
In a move that mirrors the U.S. government’s ban on Dahua and Hikvision...
Directory of 201 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Aug 04, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
Face Masks Increase Face Recognition Errors Says NIST on Aug 04, 2020
COVID-19 has led to widespread facemask use, which as IPVM testing has shown...
Dahua Loses Australian Medical Device Approval on Aug 04, 2020
Dahua has cancelled its medical device registration after "discussions" with...
Google Invests in ADT, ADT Stock Soars on Aug 03, 2020
Google has announced a $450 million investment in the Florida-based security...