This concept/TCO study is not new to Axis and I would bet this is the same study they have promoted for many years with an update to add zipstream
It was unreasonable 8 years ago and unreasonable today...
Axis is doing a full marketing push for a new TCO study, with various Axis divisions and their media partners promoting this TCO study.
This certainly is not the first Axis TCO study. For example, in 2010, Axis' dubious Analog vs IP TCO study created significant debate.
However, now Axis is taking a much different approach and segmentation, reflecting Axis changing strategy and two questionable selected.
TCO ******** - * **** / ******** *******
*** **** ***** ** ***** ****** a **** ******, **** * $*** ****** to ****** *,*** *******, **** ******* items **** *******, *******, ***, *** then *******/******** *** ****** **** * ** **** period.
**** ***** *********** *** ****, *** even ***********, *** **** *************, ******* them ** ********* *** ********** ** any ** **** **** *********** ** typical camera *******. ******** ***** **** *******, ********* use ** ***** ** ****** ******, and involvement ** * **** ******* ** personnel (**** ********** ** ******** ***** roles ** *** *****) *** * big **** ** **** ***** ** hard ** **** **** ****** ***********. Additionally, ** **** ****** ** *** study, ******* ***** ***** ** **** are ** ******, **** ***** *** not ***** **** ************* **** ***** large *********** ** ********* ************.
Axis ***** #* - ****' ****** *********** ***** *****
**** ***** * ****** ************* ** maintenance ****** ******, ***** ** ******* from * ****** ********:
*** **** ******** ****** **** **** products *** **** ** **** ***** more ******** **** ***** ********** ********. How ***** *** *** ** ******** if *** ******* ***** **** ********* by * ****** ** ****?
***** ** ****, **** **** *** cost ** ******* **** ****** ******** would **** **** $***,*** ** $*,***,***+.
******* ******* *** ***** ******, ** the ******* ** *** "***** ****", it ** ********** *** *** ****** to **** ** *** *********** **** realistic. ** ***** *** ** ********* to *** * **** ******* **** from * ***-*** ***** **** ** Longse, *** ***** ******* ****** (********, Hanwha, *********, *********, ****, ***.), **** all ***** ** ******* ******** ****** ************* ****** ** ***** ********, *** ***** ** expected ** **** ******* ***** ********** to ****.
**** **** **** ****** ******** **** to **** **** **** ******* ** unrealistic, ********** **** *********** ****** ***** **** lack ***** ********** ** ***** **** competitors, ** **** ****** ** ****** that **** *** **** *******.
**** **** *** *********** ******* **** comparison, **** **** *** **** ** iron-clad **** ****. *** ****** *** AXIS ******* ** **** *** ** roughly $*,***,***, **** ** *****-**** ******** had * ******** ****** ******* ****, they ***** ***** ** ******* *******, **** the **** ******* *** *** ******* offsetting *** **** ** ****** ******* rate.
Axis ***** #* - ********* ***** *****
*** ***** **** ***** **** **** makes ********** ********* ******* **** ******* from ******** *********:
***** ** ** *** ******* ******* **** Zipstream (** **** ***** ******* ******* in *** *******), **** ** *** the **** ******* **** * ***** CODEC. **** ***** **** *** ************* them **** *********, *********, ******, *****, etc., *** *** **** *** ********* large ********.
******* ***** **** ****' ********* ***** ** *** stated $300/camera *******, ** ** *** ********* to **** *********** ******* **** *** $300 ******* **** ********** **** ******. Thus **** ** * ****** **** not ******* **** **** ** ***** CODEC, ** ** ** $*** **** than *** **** ******, ** ***** end ** ***** **** *********, ********* to ****' *** ****.
******* *** ************ ** ***** ******, and ***** *******, ****** *** ********** product ***** ** ********** ** ** alternative ** *********.
Show ** *********
**** **** ***** ** **** ***** positioning **** ** * ************ ****** in ***** ***** ** ******* **** showing ***** ******* ** *** ****** cost ******. ********* ******** ***** **** of ***** ** *** **** ** overpay, *** **** **** ***** ***** more ** ** **** * ****** they ******* *** ****** ********** ***** requirements.
Redefining *** *****
****' ********** **** **** *** ******* badly ******, ********** ** ***-*** *******, *** they are ***** ****** ** ********* ***** ***** approach. **** ** *** **** ******* in *** ******** ** **** **** study, *** **** ** ***** *** products *** ************, *** **** ** other *******, **** ** **** ****** ******* **** ** **** their ****, ******* ***** ***** ***** ********* ********. **** ** ********** ********** ** a ********* ******* ******* ** * camera ******* *** ******* **** ********** in ***** *******.
This concept/TCO study is not new to Axis and I would bet this is the same study they have promoted for many years with an update to add zipstream
It was unreasonable 8 years ago and unreasonable today...
I would bet this is the same study they have promoted for many years with an update to add zipstream
No, completely different. The older one(s) had small camera counts that reflected average deployments while this one has shifted to mega deployments.