Debating Axis's IP vs Analog Cost Comparison

Author: John Honovich, Published on Dec 13, 2010

We disagree with Axis's claim that IP is lower cost than analog for 14 camera installations. We believe their 'study' is fundamentally flawed and biased. In this report, we critique the study and provide a tutorial on the relative cost of IP and analog products.

[Update 2012: The economics of IP vs Analog have changed significantly since 2010, making these claims and comparison no longer applicable.]

For background, we recommend readers review Axis's IP vs Analog Cost Comparison announcement/report. The study was prepared by Lusax (University of Lund, Sweden).

[Update: 1 Hour Webinar on IP vs Analog now included.]

A Very Green(field) Assumption

Axis's study assumes a critically false and biased assumption - that no surveillance equipment is currently being used (i.e., 'greenfield').

The clear majority of organizations buying surveillance systems today already have analog cameras and cabling deployed. A significant portion of that infrastructure can and regularly is reused. Assuming that they do not helps the hypothetical IP case significantly but ignores the practical reality.

With that noted, we will focus on the greenfield scenario to show even there, IP is more expensive.

Specs of the 14 Camera Scenario

To understand the relative costs, let's examine the other main specifications in their study:

  • 12 indoor cameras, varifocal lenses, no WDR, no day/night, no vandal; Axis requires the IP bid to use their M3203
  • 2 outdoor cameras, varifocal lenses, day/night, WDR, vandal, Axis requires the IP bid to use their P3343-VE
  • Record video for up to 7 days at H.264 with a max of 15fps; Axis requires the IP bid to use their Axis Camera Station
  • Cable runs are all fairly short - 100 feet or less

For the analog side, Axis requires bidding "quality 'brand' name cameras" and a "mid-end 'brand' name DVR."

Axis's Results

Axis provided a list of 30 security integrators; 5 of them provide hypothetical bids for both IP and analog offerings. For the 14 camera scenario, the average IP bid was 11% less than the average analog bid. The analog bids averaged about $17,000 while the IP bids averaged about $15,000.

Calculating Comparative Costs

We are going to focus on surveillance product costs as they are the main factors driving overall cost.

IP Costs

  • The 12 indoor Axis domes will cost about $4,700 online (average pricing about $390).
  • The 2 outdoor Axis domes will cost about $1,800 online (average pricing about $900).
  • 14 Axis Camera Station licenses will cost about $1,300 online
  • PC to run the software will cost about $800 (assuming a SMB tower PC)

The total costs for core surveillance products on the IP bid is about $8,600. In addition there is cabling, mounting, PoE switch, installation costs, etc.

Analog Costs

The integrator has to decide on what analog products to bid, as it is not hard spec'd like the IP side. A few points to keep in mind:

  • The Axis M3203 offers basic hardware and imaging (e.g., no WDR, no day/night, not vandal proof plus only a 1 year warranty). The analog camera can be fairly simple with a varifocal lens as the most important requirement. [Note: Axis offers a vandal proof option but it is not specified here.]
  • Since Axis requires 15fps per camera, the DVR will need to be 240fps (note: DVRs are generally sold as 120fps, 240fps or 480fps appliances).
  • Since Axis wants 7 days of recording at 4CIF, a 1TB DVR should be fine.

With those points noted, let's pick our surveillance products (again using online price):

The total costs for core surveillance products on the analog bid is $6,450.

Let's compare the costs of the core surveillance products:

  • IP products: $8,600
  • Analog products: $6,450

Most of the other costs are similar: pulling cables, mounting cameras, configuring the system, training the customer, etc. As such, structurally, there's not major cost differences. However, the IP side requires greater skill and more costly techs as a PC needs to set up for the VMS software and a laptop or a $600 field monitor to focus the cameras. By contrast, with analog, you simply boot up the DVR, plug in the cameras and focus them using a cheap hand held monitor.

Our Total Cost Estimate

With the cost comparison above, assuming the less likely case of pure greenfield, for the 14 camera scenario we estimate:

  • Analog: $11,000 - $12,000
  • IP: $13,500 - $14,000

In the more likely scenario that the site can reuse existing cabling, we expect the analog cost to be $1,000 or more lower than greenfield (the exact amount lower depends on how much cabling and cameras are reused).

In percentage terms, we expect analog to be 20% for greenfield and around 30% for replacement of existing system.

Alternative Bids / Products

Certainly, different products could be bid. For instance, rather than the proprietary Axis Camera Station, the less expensive and more open Milestone Essential can be substituted. This will reduce the IP cost around $600. You might also choose a different outdoor dome as the Axis P series is fairly expensively and likely overkill for this small site scenario.

On the analog side, you can go even cheaper as well. There are solid Taiwan and Chinese DVRs with similar specifications for under $3,000. You could save on cameras as well by following the same process.

Structural Cost Savings for Analog

The bottom line is that analog has structural cost savings vs Standard definition IP. It's simply more economical to encode cameras in a group (i.e., a DVR) then to encode them individually (i.e., in an IP camera).

For any given feature set, IP cameras always cost significantly more than analog. While a DVR costs more than PC plus VMS software, that increase in cost is less than the savings on the camera side.

Is IP Still Worth It?

Cost is not everything. IP still might be worth based on other important factors such as (1) using their own PCs/servers, (2) using the same cabling as their PCs, (3) flexibility in expansion, (4) the moderately improved resolution of the SVGA IP cameras over the VGA cameras, etc.

However, a fair bid by competent integrators in this 14 camera scenario will give the price advantage to analog.

The Importance of Megapixel

We are surprised that the 'hypothetical' bid does not include megapixel because the higher resolution of IP provides the strongest change for an IP system to beat analog.

  • The price increase is minimal: For instance, that same Axis M series has a higher resolution option (the HD 720p M3204) for only $60 more. That's a major increase in detail/image quality for a little money. Now, Axis has a major hole in its portfolio - only it's expensive premium cameras support over 720p. However, for less than $100 more, we can choose from (15) HD 1080p, 2MP or 3MP cameras.
  • With the greater resolution, we can replace some of the indoor cameras that are close together (saving camera cost, install cost, VMS software license cost, etc.)
  • With the greater resolution, we can provide far superior outdoor coverage that would be impractical or extremely expensive with analog (requiring deployment of numerous outdoor analog cameras).

Note: Pro members can review our analysis of Megapixel IP vs Analog Cameras where we breakdown and compare the costs and positioning of the two options.

** ******** **** ****'* ***** **** ** ** ***** **** than ****** *** ** ****** *************. ** ******* ***** '*****' is ************* ****** *** ******. ** **** ******, ** ******** the ***** *** ******* * ******** ** *** ******** **** of ** *** ****** ********.

[****** ****: *** ********* ** ** ** ****** **** ******* significantly ***** ****, ****** ***** ****** *** ********** ** ****** applicable.]

*** **********, ** ********* ******* **********'* ** ** ****** **** ********** ************/******. *** ***** *** ******** *******(********** ** ****, ******).

[******: * **** ******* ** ** ** ****** *** ********.]

A **** *****(*****) **********

****'* ***** ******* * ********** ***** *** ****** ********** - that ** ************ ********* ** ********* ***** **** (*.*., '**********').

*** ***** ******** ** ************* ****** ************ ******* ***** ******* have ****** ******* *** ******* ********. * *********** ******* ** that ************** *** *** ********* ** ******. ******** **** **** do *** ***** *** ************ ** **** ************* *** ******* the ********* *******.

**** **** *****, ** **** ***** ** *** ********** ******** to **** **** *****, ** ** **** *********.

Specs ** *** ** ****** ********

** ********** *** ******** *****, ***'* ******* *** ***** **** specifications ** ***** *****:

  • ** ****** *******, ********* ******, ** ***, ** ***/*****, ** vandal; **** ******** *** ** *** ** *** **********
  • * ******* *******, ********* ******, ***/*****, ***, ******, **** ******** the ** *** ** *** **********-**
  • ****** ***** *** ** ** * **** ** *.*** **** a *** ** *****; **** ******** *** ** *** ** use ********* ****** *******
  • ***** **** *** *** ****** ***** - *** **** ** less

*** *** ****** ****, **** ******** ******* "******* '*****' **** cameras" *** * "***-*** '*****' **** ***."

Axis's *******

**** ******** * **** ** ** ******** ***********; * ** them ******* ************ **** *** **** ** *** ****** *********. For *** ** ****** ********, *** ******* ** *** *** 11% **** **** *** ******* ****** ***. *** ****** **** averaged ***** $**,*** ***** *** ** **** ******** ***** $**,***.

Calculating *********** *****

** *** ***** ** ***** ** ************ ******* ***** ** they *** *** **** ******* ******* ******* ****.

** *****

  • *** ** ****** **** ***** **** **** ***** $*,*** ****** (average ******* *****$***).
  • *** * ******* **** ***** **** **** ***** $*,*** ****** (average ******* *****$***).
  • ** **** ****** ******* ******** **** **** ***** $*,*** ******
  • ** ** *** *** ******** **** **** ***** $*** (******** a *** ***** **)

*** ***** ***** *** **** ************ ******** ** *** ** bid ** ***** $*,***. ** ******** ***** ** *******, ********, PoE ******, ************ *****, ***.

****** *****

*** ********** *** ** ****** ** **** ****** ******** ** bid, ** ** ** *** **** ****'* **** *** ** side. * *** ****** ** **** ** ****:

  • *** **** ***** ****** ***** ******** *** ******* (*.*., ** WDR, ** ***/*****, *** ****** ***** **** **** * * year ********). *** ****** ****** *** ** ****** ****** **** a ********* **** ** *** **** ********* ***********. [****: **** offers * ****** ***** ****** *** ** ** *** ********* here.]
  • ***** **** ******** ***** *** ******, *** *** **** **** to ** ****** (****: **** *** ********* **** ** ******, 240fps ** ****** **********).
  • ***** **** ***** * **** ** ********* ** ****, * 1TB *** ****** ** ****.

**** ***** ****** *****, ***'* **** *** ************ ******** (***** using ****** *****):

*** ***** ***** *** **** ************ ******** ** *** ****** bid ** $*,***.

***'* ******* *** ***** ** *** **** ************ ********:

  • ** ********: $*,***
  • ****** ********: $*,***

**** ** *** ***** ***** *** *******: ******* ******, ******** cameras, *********** *** ******, ******** *** ********, ***. ** ****, structurally, *****'* *** ***** **** ***********. *******, *** ** **** requires ******* ***** *** **** ****** ***** ** * ** needs ** *** ** *** *** *** ******** *** * laptop ** * $******** ********* ***** *** *******. ** ********, **** ******, *** ****** boot ** *** ***, **** ** *** ******* *** ***** them ***** * ***** **** **** *******.

Our ***** **** ********

**** *** **** ********** *****, ******** *** **** ****** **** of **** **********, *** *** ** ****** ******** ** ********:

  • ******: $**,*** - $**,***
  • **: $**,*** - $**,***

** *** **** ****** ******** **** *** **** *** ***** existing *******, ** ****** *** ****** **** ** ** $*,*** or **** ***** **** ********** (*** ***** ****** ***** ******* on *** **** ******* *** ******* *** ******).

** ********** *****, ** ****** ****** ** ** **% *** greenfield *** ****** **% *** *********** ** ******** ******.

Alternative **** / ********

*********, ********* ******** ***** ** ***. *** ********, ****** **** the *********** **** ****** *******, *** **** ********* *** **** open ********* ********* *** ** ***********. **** **** ****** *** IP **** ****** $***. *** ***** **** ****** * ********* outdoor **** ** *** **** * ****** ** ****** *********** and ****** ******** *** **** ***** **** ********.

** *** ****** ****, *** *** ** **** ******* ** well. ***** *** ***** ****** *** ******* **** **** ******* specifications *** ***** $*,***. *** ***** **** ** ******* ** well ** ********* *** **** *******.

Structural **** ******* *** ******

*** ****** **** ** **** ****** *** ********** **** ******* vs ******** ********** **. **'* ****** **** ********** ** ****** cameras ** * ***** (*.*., * ***) **** ** ****** them ************ (*.*., ** ** ** ******).

*** *** ***** ******* ***, ** ******* ****** **** ************* more **** ******. ***** * *** ***** **** **** ** plus *** ********, **** ******** ** **** ** **** **** the ******* ** *** ****** ****.

Is ** ***** ***** **?

**** ** *** **********. ** ***** ***** ** ***** ***** on ***** ********* ******* **** ** (*) ***** ***** *** PCs/servers, (*) ***** *** **** ******* ** ***** ***, (*) flexibility ** *********, (*) *** ********** ******** ********** ** *** SVGA ** ******* **** *** *** *******, ***.

*******, * **** *** ** ********* *********** ** **** ** camera ******** **** **** *** ***** ********* ** ******.

The ********** ** *********

** *** ********* **** *** '************' *** **** *** ******* megapixel ******* *** ****** ********** ** ** ******** *** ********* change *** ** ** ****** ** **** ******.

  • *** ***** ******** ** *******: *** ********, **** **** **** M ****** *** * ****** ********** ****** (*** ** *********) *** **** $** ****. ****'* * ***** ******** ** detail/image ******* *** * ****** *****. ***, **** *** * major **** ** *** ********* - **** **'* ********* ******* cameras ******* **** ****. *******, *** **** **** $*** ****, we *** ****** ****(**) ** *****, *** ** *** *******.
  • **** *** ******* **********, ** *** ******* **** ** *** indoor ******* **** *** ***** ******** (****** ****** ****, ******* cost, *** ******** ******* ****, ***.)
  • **** *** ******* **********, ** *** ******* *** ******** ******* coverage **** ***** ** *********** ** ********* ********* **** ****** (requiring ********** ** ******** ******* ****** *******).

****: *** ******* *** ****** *********** ** ********* ** ** ****** ************ ** ********* *** ******* *** ***** *** *********** ** the *** *******.

[***************]

*** **** ** ****** ******* ** ******** *****. ******* *********:

  • *****: **** ********** ** *** ******* *** **?
  • * ****** ****: **** ****** *** *** ***** **** ** Axis?
  • * ****** ****: *** ** *******, **** ***** *** ***?
  • ** ****** ****: ********* ** ******** ** *********
  • ** ****** ****: *** ***** ********* ****** ********
  • ** ****** ****: ***** *** *** * $*,*** ***?
  • ** ****** ****: *************** *********** **** ** **** *********
  • ** ****** ****: *** *********** *******
  • ** ****** ****: *** ********* ** ****** *******, *** ****** DVR ** *** ******** + ********?
  • ** ****** ****: *********** ******* *****
Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Canon 250MP Prototype Targeted At Surveillance on Jan 17, 2017
At one point Axis declared the megapixel race was over, but now parent company Canon is showing an imager that would be a rocket ship in a...
Genetec Favorability Results on Jan 16, 2017
In the race to the bottom and flight to 'solutions', Genetec has taken a contrary path. The company remains independent, focusing up market,...
Free VMS Software Directory on Jan 13, 2017
Many Video Management Software (VMS) providers offer free versions, either open source, for a limited number of cameras or for a limited amount of...
Milestone Essential Subscription Removed on Jan 12, 2017
Subscriptions may be the future for Milestone and VMSes but not right now. Responding to negative feedback, Milestone has removed subscriptions...
IP Networking Course January 2017 on Jan 12, 2017
This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance professionals plus it includes live training, personal help and...
ONVIF Favorability Results on Jan 11, 2017
ONVIF has been one of the most debated aspects of the video surveillance industry. On the one hand, its aim to increase interoperability has been...
HD Analog Usage Rising But Barriers Growing on Jan 09, 2017
The good news for HD analog is that its usage is rising, fairly significantly since our 2015 HD analog usage statistics. The bad news for HD...
How Axis Can Beat Hikvision on Jan 09, 2017
Hikvision has rocked the industry globally, bullying former video surveillance revenue leader Axis even in the Western world. What can Axis...
Cisco Favorability Ratings - Positive In Networking, Negative In Surveillance on Jan 06, 2017
Cisco is the big name in networking, but they have not been able to leverage their brand and sizable sales channel in the security industry to the...
DeskCamera ONVIF Screen Capture on Jan 05, 2017
Recording PC screens have historically been an expensive proposition, requiring dedicated hardware or specialized, proprietary software. However,...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Jim Cramer Sucks Up To Knightscope on Jan 19, 2017
Credit must be given to Knightscope. They are raising money right now and despite their $80 million pre-money valuation against a lowly sub $1...
ADT Launches Canopy - Professional Monitoring For DIY Devices on Jan 19, 2017
The intrusion industry has criticized DIY security systems for years, claiming systems like Canary or Scout cannot match professionally installed...
Dahua (Un)Favorability Results on Jan 19, 2017
Dahua, the mega-Chinese surveillance manufacturer not primarily owned by the Chinese government has been trying to break out of the shadow of...
Paxton Hosted Access - Disruptive Low Dealer Pricing on Jan 19, 2017
Paxton is entering the hosted access game, with BLU, at a cost that is a fraction of key competitors. The different approach could be very...
Geovision Launches Direct Cloud Offering on Jan 18, 2017
Add cloud, subtract integrator. Geovision has launched myGVcloud, an offering that allows consumers to buy cameras and cloud services directly...
Anixter / Bosch Sells Direct to Amazon on Jan 18, 2017
Anixter regularly says they do not sell direct to end users or that they do not do it anymore. However, over the past year, Anixter has sold Bosch...
Smart Power Tools For Security Installs on Jan 18, 2017
Installing a smart camera? Perhaps you should use a 'smart' drill. The intelligent appliance / IoT trend has hit power tools. In this note, we...
Canon 250MP Prototype Targeted At Surveillance on Jan 17, 2017
At one point Axis declared the megapixel race was over, but now parent company Canon is showing an imager that would be a rocket ship in a...
Cut in Half, Everfocus Shifts Strategies on Jan 17, 2017
The race to the bottom impact continues. Now, Everfocus, who used to be one of the larger budget providers, is shifting strategies after years of...
Top ISC West 2017 Booth Moves on Jan 16, 2017
There are significant moves among many major manufacturers on the ISC West show floor, and very few prime spaces left unoccupied. In this report we...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact