*******
***** ** *** ***** of *** **** ******* Radar *****-**, ***** *** several **********:
- ***** ********* ****** *** specified *****:*** ***** ******** ******** humans *** ******** **** few ****** (********* *****) at ********* ** ** 50m, *** ********* *****.
- *** ***** ******:***** *******, *****, *******, debris, *** ***** ****** sources ** ***** ****** in ***** ********* *** not ******* *** *****. The **** ***** ****** seen ****** ******* **** due ** *** **** it *** ******* ** swaying ** **** ****, eliminated ** ********* ******* objects.
- **** *** ***********:*** ***** ***** ** an **** ****** ** all ***** ******, ********** a *** ********* **** target ********, ******** *********** required ******** ** ******, which ********* **** ****** location ******** *** ******* the *** ** ******* this *********** ** * map.
- ****** ***** *** ***********:***** ** *** ***** was ******, ********* **** a ********* *** ** be ***** *** **********, along **** ******** ******, taking **** * *** minutes ** ********.
*******, ***** ****** ****** of ***** *** ***********:
- ***** ******* ***** *********:****** ******* ** ****** metal ******* **** ** cars *** ****** ****** spotty *********, ** ** worse, ***** ****** ** human ********. ***** ****** carefully ******** ********* ** the ***** ** **** of ******** *** *** off *********.
- ******* *** ************:******* ****' ****** **** the ***** "******* ************ for *** *******", **** tracking *** ******* *** could **** ** *** to *** **** ******/**** FOVs. ********** **** ***** resulted ** ******** ***** ********* cut *** ** ***** out ** *** ******'* field ** ****.
**** **** **** ****** little ** ** ****** on ***** *********** *** to *******. *******, ** have *** *** ****** this ** ********** **** been ****. ** **** to **** ** **** and/or **** ** *********.
*******
*** **** *****-** ***** for ~$1,200-1,300 *** ******. * VMS ******* **** ********* beneeded *** **** **** for **********.
Pros ** *********
******** ** **** ***** analytics ** ************ *******, the *****-** ******** ******, completely ******** ****** ***** alarm ******* **** ** shadows, ******, **** ******* foliage ** ******, ***. These ****** ***** **** false ****** ** **** the top ********* ** **** tested.
******** ** ***** ********* on ******* *******, ***** alerts **** ********* ** much ****** *** ******* cameras *** ********* *********. One ***** **** ** thermal **** ********* ** long *****, ***** *** Axis ***** ***** ******** limit.
** *** ****** **** *** finds ****** ****** ***** analytics (****** ******* ********* or ******** **** ******** ones), **** **** ****** be **** ****-********* **** the **** *****. **** you *** ** * separate ******, *** **** of **** ***** ******, the **** ** ********** the ***** *** *** cost ** *** *** license, **** ** * significant ****** ** ***** if * '*****' ****** can ** ***** *** alerting *********** ** ***.
Physical ********
*** ***** ** * wall ***** **** ***** 12" **** ** *" tall, **** *** ****** (black) ******* *********** **** for ***** ***** *** the ***** ****** ********* in *** *****, ******* portion.
*** *****'* ******** ***** is ****, *** *** radar ****** ****** *** be ****** ** +/- 25°, ****** ** **** the ******** **** ** the **** ** * building, *** *******. *******, no ************ ****** *** available, ** *** ***** may *** ** ****** to ***** ***-****** ***** which *** *** **** covered **** *** **° mounting *****, *** ***** up ** **** ** compensate *** ******.
*** ***** ******** *** Form * ***** *** 4 ************ */** ***** may ** **** ** trigger ***** ******* ** specific ***** ****** *****. Note **** **** *** Form * ***** *** carry *******.
** ****** ***** ******** in **** *****:
Reference *** ***********
*********** *** ***** ******** only * *** *****, asking *** **** ** input ******** ****** *** pick *** ****** ** the *** (***** *****). In *** *****, ********* distances **** ******** ***** this ***** *****.
RMD ***** ******* ** ***
******* ** *** ***** found ** ** *******, the ***** ******** ************* for ***** ****** ********* zones (***). ***** *** create ** ** ** include ** ******* ***** which *** ******** **********, allowing *** **** ** cover **** * ******* lot ***** ******* ****** the ***** ******, *** example.
***** *** ** *** to ******* ** ***** sized ******* ***/** ******** and/or ***** *** ******* objects ** **** **** detection.
VMS ***********
*** *****-** **** ** VMSes ** * ******, instead ** ***** ***** integrations ** *******, *** uses * *** ****** channel *******. **** ******* the ****** ** *********** work ***** **** ** performed, ** ** **** the **** ***** ***. However, this ***** ***** **** multiple ********* **** **** them *** **********, ******* of ***** **** ** place **** *** ** a ****** *** ****. Other ********* ********* ******* (*********,*****,********* *********) ********* **** ****** and ******** ********, *** a ***** ******, *** require ********** *** *********** ** place ***** ******* ** a *** ****.
********* *** ******* **** integrate ***** **** ******, which *** ** **** to ***** ******, *********, etc. *** ******* ***** shows ******** ********* *** two ***** ***** ** Milestone:
Detection *****
** *** *****, *** radar ******** ******** ******** out ** ~***/~***', *** specified *****, **** ** both ******** *** ***** targets. *********** *** ******** better **** ******** ******* moving ****** ** **** from *** ***** ******* of ***********, *** ***** was ****** *** **** in **** *****. ** the ******* *****, *** subject *****
************, ** *** ** false ****** ****** ** blowing ******* ** ***** animals, ******* *** *****'* coverage ********* **** *** brush ***** *****.
Metal ******* ***** *********
***** ******* **** ** vehicles, ************, ***** ********** poles, ***., ******* ********* performance ** ******* ** entirely. *** *******, **** the ******* ***** ****** the vehicle ** *** **** below, *** ***** ***** to ***** *** ***** he ** **** *** other ****. ***** ****** beware ** **** ***** when ******* *** *****, as ***** ** ******** or **** ***** ************/***** may ************* ******* *********.
PTZ ************ ****
*** *****-** ******** * PTZ ************ **** ******* installed **** *** *******, used ** ********* ****** ****** ***** ******** *******. In *** *****, **** tracking *** *** ******** properly **** ******* ********, as **** **** ****** cut *** ******** ** missed **** ********. *******, autotracking ***** **** ***** zoom ****** (~**-**% ******* of **% *******), *** fine ******* *** ** unavailable.
*** ******* ***** ***** a ******* ******** ** ~125' *** ******* **** and **** *** ***** and ******, ************* ******* properly **********.
**** **** **** **** to ******* ************ ** future ******** ********.
******** ******* ******
*** **** ****** ******** available ** *** **** of ******* *** ****: 7.15.4.1
We bought and tested the D2050-VE to see how it performed, testing:
Comments (24)
Scott Sheldrake
Wow this looks very cool!
Create New Topic
Undisclosed Integrator #1
Good Article. We have been running ours for a while on test.
We found the detection range was good and it seems to integrate well with Milestone. It has only produced one false alarm that we are aware of in very heavy Sleet / Snow.
Shame about the price that kind of lets it down and pushes the product away from the small business job to the utility / military / corporate area.
Aside from that, its very impressive, well built and thought out.
Create New Topic
Undisclosed Integrator #2
Great review, thanks!
Create New Topic
Undisclosed #3
Could you put one on a third part ptz mount running a fast pan-only guard tour to get 360 degree airport style radar coverage?
Create New Topic
fox vision
i am interested in this device is there any other modules that can do the same operation , with greater distance and lower cost .
if there is other options can any one help ??
Create New Topic
Zachary Brunette
Thank you for this review, great info.
Were you able to test detection ability of a human subject moving within the wooded portions of the coverage area?
Create New Topic
Daniel Cyr
08/27/18 12:15am
Good report and similar to our observations. We are monitoring a site that the radar was installed on a fence post and the integrator had to move it as it created many false alarms when there was high winds. Otherwise we monitor it through Genetec Security Center and it's perfect since when there is a detection, we see the live video and the map overlay with also a small PIP window with a 10 second clip of the alarm. It is very efficient for our operators to rapidly identify intruders. Overall a good solution to reduce the number of false alarms and still have a good security of your perimeter.
Create New Topic
Daniel Cyr
08/27/18 06:34pm
Hey Ethan! Indeed the post was around 14 to 20 feet high as to what we could see on the camera (I didn't see the install since we only monitor this site). The post seems to be a metal fence post but the corners ones that are a little bigger then the ones used for each fence sections. It wasn't swaying that much from the view we had of the camera pointing in that direction but enough to cause hundreds of false alarms per day.
Create New Topic
Franky Lam
09/11/18 08:03am
Is anyone try on Dahua B-300 and B-100 model?
Create New Topic
Undisclosed Integrator #4
and not far behind Dahua is Hikvision
https://www.hikvision.com/en/Products/Alarm/Security-Radar/DS-PR1-60
Create New Topic
John Honovich
Axis now has released a new D2110-VE, marketing video below:
Create New Topic
Undisclosed End User #5
The install manual for this product says "If there are a lot of metal objects in the field of view there will be a lot of reflections impacting the performance." If the field of view includes a building with a prominent metal roof, will the reflections off the roof render the radar ineffective for a large area? Like using a mirror to shine sunlight into your eyes can blind you?
The above review explains that a target will go undetected *behind* a metal object (e.g. car), but my concern is whether the metal object also causes detection loss or false positives in a large area on the sides, in addition to area of the metal body itself.
Create New Topic
Robert Batten
Has anyone integrated one with exacqVision yet? If so, how daunting of a task was it?
Create New Topic