Axis 4K vs. 5MP Camera Shootout (Q3518-LVE + Q3517-LVE)

By Ethan Ace, Published Oct 04, 2018, 10:45am EDT

Axis has released the 4K counterpart to their 5MP Q3517-LVE (see our test).

Axis claims of both these cameras:

Simply put, AXIS Q3518(17)-LVE delivers the best video quality possible.

But which one is truly best?

We bought and tested the 4K Q3518-LVE to see how it compares to its lower resolution counterpart, testing in multiple real world scenes, examining:

  • <1 Lux image details with IR on
  • Low light (2-3 lux) image details in color mode
  • Outdoor full light daytime images
  • WDR performance
  • Integrated IR coverage evenness
  • Integrated IR range
  • Bandwidth performance
  • Physical features comparison
  • Installation issues
  • Advanced hardware/software features
  • Pricing comparison

Note: This is the first in a series of updated 4K camera tests, leading to a shootout in the coming months. We also plan to test new models from Dahua, Hikvision, Vivotek, and others. Let us know what we should test in our discussion: What 4K Cameras Should We Include In A Shootout?

Summary: ** ********** ******/********* **** ********

******* *** ** *****-*** producing **% ******* ***** density, ***** ******* *********** in *** ***** **** fairly *******.

*** ** ***** ******** slight ** ******** ***** in ******* ******** ** the *** *****, **** notably ** ***** ***** at IR ** *** ******* well *** ******, **** only ****** ************* ** low ***** (*-* ***) color *******.

************, *** *********** *** similar ******* ******* ** both *****, ******** ****** with *******/******* ***** ** well ** ****** ****** with **** ******** ********.

*******, *** ** ******'* bandwidth *** ************* ****** than *** *** ***** in *** ****** ******, with ********* ** (****) and ******** ****** ** the *****, **** **** standardized *** *********. ******* of ****, *******-********* ***** may **** *** *****'* slight ********** ** *** outweigh *** ********* *********.

Pricing **********: ~$*** ******* **** *** *****

*** *****-*** ***** *** $1,250 *** ******, ***** $100 **** **** *** 5MP *****-*** (~$*,*** ******).

***** ******* ** ******* to **** ** ***********, such ** *** ********* **-*********-****(~$*,***), *** ******* ****** than******'* ***-*****(~$*** ******).

Physically **** *******

*** ***** ** ******** very ******* ** *** Q3517, ***** *** **** housing *** ******, **** the **** ***, *****, power, *** */* *****, and ********* ** **** apart, ***** *****.

******* ** ***** ************, those ******** **** ***** Q35 ******* **** **** few *********** ** *** hardware ******** ** *** Q3518. ** ****** **** details ** *** ***'* construction ** *** *** of **** ******.

Both ******* ****/****** ** **** *****

** *** *****, **** the ***** *** ***** met ***** ********* ***/~***' IR *****, **** ************ visible ** **** ********. However, ************ *** ********** weak, **** **** ********* possible, *** ******* *********** due ** *** *** (~10 *** ** ***** widest ***, ~** *** at **** *********). ******* are ***** ** *********** below.

Q3518 ****** ************ ** **** ****

*******, *** *****'* ************ was ******* **** **** than *** ***** ** wide ****** ** ****, with *** ***** ** the ***** ** **** significantly ****** **** *** center.

** ******** ****** ** view, ************ *** **** in **** *******, *** noticeably ******** ** *** edge ** *** *****.

[effects output image]

Better *****/** ******* ** ***** ***** (~*.** ***)

** ***** ** * ~0.02 *** *****, *** 4K ***** ******** ******** better ****** ** *** subject **** *** *****, with ****** ****** ****** and *-* ********** ******* lines ** ****.

q3518 slightly better ir details at close range

No ********* ********** ** ***/**** ***** (*****, ~*.** ***)

** ****** ******, *** Q3518 ******** ******** ****** clarity ** *** ******* and **** *****, *** does *** ******* *** additional ****** ******* ******** to *** *****.

similar performance at mid range

*******, ** *** *******' max ** *****, ~***'/***, details *** ***** *******, with *** ** ***** slightly ****** **** *** Q3517.

similar performance at long range

4K ***** ****** ******* **** *** ** ***** ****, ~* ***

** ~* *** ** color ****, *** ***** suffers **** ****** ****** of ******* ***** *** artifacts, ********* ******** **** clarity ** *** *******'* face **** *** *** model. *******, * ********** text ***** *** ******* in *** ***** ******** to *** *****, ***** appears ***********.

4k worse details in color mode 30

** ~**' *** ******, details *** *********** ******* in *** *** *******, with ** ****** ******* of *** ******* *** no ******* ******* ****.

4k worse details in color mode 60

Slight ******** ** ******* *******

** ***** *****, ~**' distance ** * **** field ** **** (~**°), the ** ***** ******** slightly ******* ******* ** fine ******* ******** **** as **** *** ****, as **** ** *** additional **** *****.

4K Slightly Better Daytime Details At Close Range

*** **** ** **** at ****** ********, ~**', with *** ******* *** text **** *********** ** the *****, ****** **** rough ******* *********.

4K Slightly Better Daytime Details At Long Range

Similar *** ***********

** ****** *** ** two *********, ***** * man **** *******/******* **** the ******* ******** ** check *** *** ****** blur *** *** *** camera ******* ** ******* in *****. ** **** scene, **** ******* ********* very *********, **** ***** adjustment ** *** ******* door *** ***** ******* of *** ******* ********** as ** ******.

axis-q3518

******, ** ******* *********** in * ****** ********* scene **** **** ******** door, **** ******** ******* from ~**,*** *** ******* to ~** ******, **** a **** **********.

wdr test field of view

** **** *****, *********** of *** *** ******* is *******, *** ******** better ** *** *** Q3517, ***** ******** ****** images ** *** ****** area ****** *** ****.

wdr comparison

Bitrate **********

*****-*** ** ******** **** drastically ****** **** *** Q3517-LVE *** **** *** and *****, **** ********* bandwidth **** ****** **** of *** *****.

axis q35 bitrate comparison

*******, **** ********** ** bitrate *** *********, ******* bitrates *** **/* *** nearly *** **** ** both ******. *** ***** delta ******* ***** ******** remains, *******.

bitrate per megapixel

Integrated *** ******** / ***** *******

*** ***** ******** ** integrated *** ******* ***** on *** ****** ** the *******, **** **** patterns *** ****** *** double ****, ** **** as ******* *** *" square *****. **** ********** installation, ** ****/**** *********** options ******* * ******** part *** *** ********, an ********** **** *** easily ********* **** ********.

************, *** ********* ** the ***** ******* ******** two ***** ** ****** slack *******. **** ***** to ****** ***** ***** so *** ******* *** be **** ****** ******* from *** *********, ******* of * **** ***** length ** ***** ******** the ******* ********, ** pushed **** **** *** wall/ceiling ***** ** *** tangle.

backplate

Snap-In ****** ******

*******, **** *** *****, the ** ****** **** a **** ** ****** module, ***** ****** ***** into *** ******* *** two ****** *****. ***** this, *** ******* *** be **** ****** ******* and ***-****** ****** ************ without **** ** *** camera ** ****, **** installers **** ******* ** snap ** *** ****** and ****** *** **** afterwards.

Physical ********

** ****** *** ******* above, ** **** ** other ******** ******** ** this *****, ***** **** our **** ** *** Q3517:

Other ******** ********

**** *** *****, *** Q3518 **** ******** * number ** ******** ******** due ** *** **-***** gyro ******, **** ***** on ***** * ****** cameras, *********:

  • ***** *********:*** ***** ** ******* of ********* ******* ** the ******, ***** *****, with ********** ***********.** *****, *** ****** may ******* * **** overlay, **** ******, *** serial *******, ** ***** functions ********* ** ****' events ********.

  • ********** ***** *************:*** ***'* ***** ************* was ********** ** ******* video ******* **** ******* to ********** ** ******** shaking/swaying, ***** *****.

  • ******** ******:** ******* *** ******** button ** *** ****** for ** *******, *** camera ****** * *******/******* indication ** **** *** camera ** *****. **** level, *** **** ***** beeping *** ******* ******, and **** ****** ****** turn *****, ***** ** this ****:

Shock *********

*** ***** ******** ***** detection ** ******** ** other ****** ********* *********, which ******* ******* ** the ****** **** ********** sensitivity. ** *****, *** camera *** ******* * text *******, **** ******, TCP ****** *******, ** other ********* ********* ** Axis' ****** ********. **** that ***** ****** *** not ********** ** **** VMSes, *** *** ********* in ******* *** *********.

Electronic ***** *************

*** *****'* ***** ************* was ********** ** ******* video ******* **** ******* to ********** ** ******** shaking/swaying, ***** *****.

Versions ****

*** ********* ******** ******** were **** ** **** test:

  • **** *****-***: *.**.*
  • **** *****-***: *.**.*

Comments (8)

Undisclosed Manufacturer #1

10/05/18 06:05am

Great shootout once again.

There seems to be a duplicate image from Q3518 under "Uneven Illumination In Wide AOVs", I believe the other one should be from Q3517.

Avatar

Ethan Ace

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed Manufacturer #1 | 10/05/18 07:47pm

Ah, thanks for pointing that out! Somehow I got the same image in there twice.

Undisclosed End User #2

In reply to Ethan Ace | 11/04/18 03:03am

Do you have any plan to test the Hikvision DS-2CD5585G0-IZHS?

Avatar

Ethan Ace

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed End User #2 | 11/05/18 05:34pm

Yes, it's actually sitting on my desk right now. Not sure on test timing, since we are in the middle of moving, but it's on the list.

Undisclosed Integrator #3

In reply to Ethan Ace | 12/12/18 04:20pm

Any updates regarding test date of DS-2CD5585G0-IZHS?

Paresh Desai

10/05/18 10:44pm

Which one would work better to capture face at gated entrance? Day/night.  Some lighting. Camera would be installed on security booth.

Avatar

Brian Anderson, CPP®

IPVMU Certified | 10/06/18 04:06am

Love these comparisons. Thanks IPVM.

Chris Chambers

03/23/19 04:07am

In the 2 daytime details pictures, the light level is incorrectly listed as "~0.02 lux".  Perhaps a duplication from the low light night shots higher up.

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,653 reports, 896 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now
Loading Related Reports