ASIS Misrepresents Show Numbers

By: John Honovich, Published on Feb 01, 2017

With years of struggling attendance and exhibitors increasingly frustrated, ASIS is gearing up for their 2017 show.

Unfortunately, their 2017 prospectus misrepresents their show numbers.

In this note, we examine the issues, contrast it to ISC West and look at the future for the ASIS show.

Bad **********

***** *** **** ********** has *********, **** *** struggled. 

** *** ******** ****, ASIS **** ** ****** attendance ***********. *** *******, for *** **** ****,**** ********:

************ *** **** **** totaled **** **** **,***. Verified *********** ********** *** 17,484 which *** ***** ************

************ ** ****** *** signed ** ****** ***** ********** is ***** *** ******** showed ** ** ****** at *** ****.

2016 '**********'

*** ****, **** **** reported *** ************ ******, not *** *********, ** the ******* **** *** prospectus *****:

*** ******* ***** ** that ************ ****** *** only ~*%, *** **%, given ****'* **,***+ ************* cited ***** (**,***+ ** 22,146 ** ~*%).

*** ****** ***** ** that **** ** *** reporting ****** ********** ** all *** ****. *******, they ********** *** **** 22,000 ******.

Registration ** **********

*** ************ ****** *********** in *** **** ********** is ********** *** ************* inflates *** **** ******** attended. *** *******, ** 2015, *** ************ ****** was ~**% ****** **** the ********** ****** (~*** vs ~**.**). ***** **** same ********** *** ****, actual **** ********** *** likely ** *** **,*** range, ****** *,*** ***** the ******** ******.

End **** ************

**** **** ** ********** about *** **** ************, highlighting **** **% ** attendees *** *** ***** next ** *** **,*** registration ******.

*** ******* ** **** in ******** ** *** 22,146 ****** ***** ******** versus ***** *** ********, it **** ******* **********, who *** ****** ****** vendors / *************, *** end *****.

 ~**% ** ********* *** exhibitors, ** ********** **** records ******* - ******* exhibitors ****** ** ***** column ** *** *****:

*** ********** ******* ~**,*** end **** ********* *** in ******* ** ** likely **** ** **** (~6,400) **** *** ****** out *** ****** *** registered *** *** *** attend (~**%) *** *** those *** ******** *** are ********** (~**%).

ISC **** ********

*** ****, **** **** competitor, ** ********, *** ******* actual ******** ********** ******* plus ******** ********** *** 2016:

Not *********

** ********* *** ******** with **** *** ********* that:

*** ******** *** **** to ****** ********** ********** only.  

** ************** ********* **** ******* the ****** **** ******** and ******* ********* *******. However, **** *** *** that for **** **** **** ******* how **** ****** *** ***** **** numbers.

*********************

**** **********, ***** ****** *******, **** ******* ******* with ****' *********** *** them:

*************** ***** ******* ****** will *** ****.

Changing ****

*******, **** *** ***** strong ** ***** ********** that ****** *** ********. The*** *** ** ***, * *** ********** team ** **, **** has *** ***** ******, moved *** ******* **** Monday ** ******* *** say **** **** ************ are ** *** ***.

*********, *** ** ***** changes *** ** ** **** accurately ****** ***** **** numbers.

Comments (18)

They should cut membership prices along with booth prices.  To below what they were before they raised them a year or two ago would be great.  A large membership increase would also help their attendance numbers I would think? 

How much pre-show marketing are these unhappy manufacturers doing?  At the end of the day it is a company's job to drive traffic to their own booth.  There are a large number of people at these shows, if no one comes to your booth that is your fault.

There are a large number of people at these shows, if no one comes to your booth that is your fault.

Adam, it comes down to price.

You buy eggs at the grocery store, if the package has 9 eggs instead of 12, everything else equal, you pay less.

You buy access to attendees at a trade show, if the attendees are 18,000 instead of 22,000, everything else equal, you pay less.

Some cooks are better using eggs. Some manufacturers are better engaging attendees but the price is certainly impacted by the quantity provided.

Unless you are suggesting that sellers can freely misrepresent their offering and that it's all buyer beware?

I guess I diverged from the prime topic of inflating/hiding true attendance numbers which I assume we all agree is BS and needs to stop immediately.  I should have led with that.

I also agreed with Ross' comment regarding the reduction of ASIS membership fees and booth rates to increase attendance.

My point was, I always hear a lot of complaining regarding shows, and my reality over the past 16 or so years is you get out what you put in.  Just buying the booth and showing up is not enough.  You need a product might be interested in.  Then you need to spend a significant amount of time and effort reaching your potential customer base to drive them to your booth.  Without that effort the show could have 50K attendees and you will still come up empty.

Adam, I agree. Certainly individual success can greatly be impacted by how the sales team prepares meeting, how marketing generates interest and how engineering develops new products, etc.

But look at the ASIS vs ISC West manufacturer survey responses:

It can't just be that manufacturers try harder at ISC West and put no effort into ASIS. To have such a big divergence in satisfaction points to differences in what the shows bring / attract.

As a female and a long-time ASIS member, I find that I am ignored about 90% of the time.  I can literally stand in the middle of the booth and no one, and I mean no one, will even say "boo".  I typically have to approach someone.  This is from both the females and the males in the booth. 

Maybe this year I'll wear a hidden camera just to show what I'm talking about. I haven't quite decided if I want to attend or not...

I'm also looking forward to the new changes with the new administration because its long overdue. IMHO.

John, thanks for this. I was wondering about the comparision after ASIS.

ISC has, at least by perception, been targeted to integrators and industry pros not end users. Since ISC has added more education and seems to be increasing the effort to shake that perception, I wonder which show is better at attracting the end user. And does that even matter to the exhibitors? After all, for the most part integrators are their customers, right?

Also, let's not forget that at ISC and ASIS, many exhibitors are also potential customers of other exhibitors. At ASIS 2016, Stanley and Securitas (Diebold) had large booths with lots of staff and many of those folks take the first chance they can to visit the manufacturer booths.

So, what number matters most to the exhibitor I suppose depends on what you are pedaling. Certainly, if I need to make a case to spend the money at only one of these shows I want more information not less. If you can only compare the two totals then wouldn't you want the bigger bang for the buck!

From another perspective, which show do I choose to attend? I used to prefer ISC even as an end user because I wanted to get more technical with the products and found it easier to get more face time with knowledgeable people. At the last ISC I found that most of the booths were staffed with sales and marketing people and less product folks. ISC's heavy attendance makes it hard to compete for the attention of someone to answer questions. I actually got more product knowledge from ASIS than ISC in 2016 which is a first. Maybe it was just bad luck.

ISC's heavy attendance makes it hard to compete for the attention of someone to answer questions. I actually got more product knowledge from ASIS than ISC in 2016 which is a first.

I can believe that.

ISC West definitely has more senior people from manufacturers on both the tech and business side but, as you say, because of how crowded ISC West has been recently, it is harder to reach those people.

Perhaps, that is an ASIS selling point - less attendees mean more time for you ;)

The problem is that many manufacturers either have or are seriously looking at scaling back their ASIS staffing because of the lower attendance levels.

We also prefer ISC due to the tech heavy presence.  If that has changed (we haven't gone the last two years) we would probably back out of that one as well.  If we can't get issues corrected or at least addressed by the right people face to face the show will have lost its value for us.   Much like the ASIS show did years ago.

I like ASIS show better than ISC West, like to go to different places, I don't care for Vegas, long flight, time change.  I will continue to go to ASIS shows as long as they have them and hope exhibitors do too!   

"The registration number highlighted in the 2017 prospectus is misleading and significantly inflates how many actually attended. For example, in 2015, the registration number was ~17% higher than the attendance number (~21k vs ~17.5k). Using that same percentage for 2016, actual 2016 attendance was likely in the 18,400 range, nearly 4,000 below the headline number."

If the same percentage held true, then why would they not just report both as they have done previously?

Answer:  the same percentage did not hold true and that's why they don't want to report it... so actual attendance was likely significantly lower than 18.4K

Answer: the same percentage did not hold true and that's why they don't want to report it...

I don't know their reason.

Or it could be just that 22,000 sounds better than 18,000. 

2015 seems to be the exception in terms of reporting two numbers, e.g., the 2014 announcement (19,000), 2013 announcement (20,600) and 2012 announcement (19,500) just report one number, which appears to be physical attendees.

The actual site location of the shows, makes the biggest difference overall - pick a location that is lame, you get lame attendance....

 

Anaheim for example...... lame location = lame attendance

 

San Diego..... Nice location = improved attendance

 

No one manufacturer is going to pull in the attendance for the show, when the location is lame......No manufacture is that good, sorry to say...

From a vendor point of view regarding ISC's staying power: the Vegas aspect - and the convenience of "The Devil you know" cannot be underestimated. There are hotel rooms aplenty (many priced at affordable rates), lots of choice for meeting and/or entertainment venues, all located in a concentrated space. Plus, people like to go there. There, I've said it. 

ASIS is reasonably priced. By contrast, ISC is very expensive, which makes it hard for the little guy, and the exhibition hall layout is also unforgiving. The layouts at ASIS used to be a more democratic mix of large and small vendors, but they now seem to have taken a page from the ISC playbook, shunting small companies to the sidelines. 

To get a better on-floor location, one option is to share a booth but be forewarned: Reed/ISC has raised their "booth participation fee" from $1000 a few years ago to $3000 - a hefty increase! 

 

ASIS continues to misrepresent its numbers in a new webinar:

ASIS continues to misrepresents its numbers in a new marketing brochure:

This one screencapped below is the worst misrepresentation so far and a clear lie, they are claiming "22,000" "buyers". As explained above, nearly 40% of attendees are exhibitors who, by definition, are sellers, not buyers.

ASIS has removed the 22,000 'buyers' reference in a new version:

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,541 reports, 882 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Uniview H1 2020 Financials Examined on Sep 08, 2020
While Dahua and Hikvision, helped by fever camera sales, are recovering from...
Hikvision Global Revenue Falls, Hit By Coronavirus on Apr 27, 2020
Hikvision's global revenue fell in the first quarter of 2020 due to the...
Manufacturers on Virtual 'ISC West' 2020 and Potential ISC West 2021 on Jun 29, 2020
With the 2020 ISC West show now officially canceled, attention turns to...
The US Fight Over Facial Recognition Explained on Jul 08, 2020
The controversy around facial recognition has grown significantly in 2020,...
Anyvision Presents AI Facial Recognition and Mask Detection on Jun 08, 2020
AnyVision presented its AI facial recognition and mask detection at the May...
2020 Mid Year Video Surveillance Industry Guide on Jul 27, 2020
The first half of 2020 has been shocking, for the world generally, and for...
Temperature Screening Is Ineffective, Says US, UK, Canada, Israel, And Ireland Health Leaders on Aug 25, 2020
Health leaders around the world are increasingly speaking out about the...
Infinova, March Networks and Swann H1 2020 Financials Examined on Sep 02, 2020
While Dahua and Hikvision, helped by fever camera sales, are recovering from...
ADT Slides Back, Disappointing Results, Poor Commercial Performance on Aug 06, 2020
While ADT had an incredible start to the week, driven by the Google...
The Booming Multi-Billion Coronavirus Fever Camera Market on Apr 21, 2020
The market for elevated body temperature detection cameras, aka 'coronavirus...
Virtual ISC West and GSX+ Exhibiting Contrasted on Sep 17, 2020
Both ISC West and ASIS GSX are going virtual this year, just weeks apart, but...
Sunell Panda Cam Body Temperature Measurement Camera Tested on May 14, 2020
Sunell is far less well known than its gargantuan domestic competitors Dahua...
Costar Technologies / Arecont H1 2020 Financials Examined on Sep 16, 2020
Costar's financial results have been hit by the coronavirus with the company...
Terrible Convergint Coronavirus Thermal Camera Recommendation on Apr 01, 2020
A week after Convergint disclosed falling revenue, pay and job cuts,...
Fever Camera Sales From Integrators Surveyed on Jun 01, 2020
Fever cameras are the hottest trend in video surveillance currently but how...

Recent Reports

Temperature Tablet Shootout - Dahua, Hikvision, ZKTeco, TVT + 5 More on Sep 30, 2020
Temperature tablets, aka terminal or stations, have emerged as a 'low-cost...
New Products Show Fall 2020 Tomorrow Bosch, FLIR, Hanwha, Tyco, Avigilon More! on Sep 30, 2020
IPVM's sixth online show concludes tomorrow with our special temperature...
ButterflyMX Raises $35 Million on Sep 30, 2020
Startup ButterflyMX has raised $35 million for its smartphone based intercom...
Worst Access Control Manufacturers 2020 on Sep 30, 2020
200+ Integrators told IPVM "In the past year, what access control...
Access Control Levels and Schedules Tutorial on Sep 29, 2020
Configuring access levels and setting up schedules is central to maintaining...
Avigilon / Motorola VS Virtual ISC West on Sep 29, 2020
ISC West has historically been so dominant that no player would think of...
Dartmouth College Deploys K3 Temperature Screening on Sep 29, 2020
While Dartmouth College has a $6+ billion endowment, the College has bought...
Hanwha AI Object Detection Tested on Sep 28, 2020
Hanwha has added detection and classification of people, cars, clothing...
Favorite Access Control Manufacturers 2020 on Sep 28, 2020
200+ Integrators told IPVM "What is your favorite access control management...
OnTech Smart Services Partners With Google and Amazon To Compete With Integrators on Sep 25, 2020
A pain point for many homeowners to use consumer security and surveillance is...
The Future of Metalens For Video Surveillance Cameras - MIT / UMass / Immervision on Sep 25, 2020
Panoramic cameras using 'fisheye' lens have become commonplace in video...
Hikvision Sues Over Brazilian Airport Loss on Sep 24, 2020
Hikvision was excluded from a Brazilian airport project because it is owned...
China General Chamber of Commerce Calls Out US Politics on Sep 24, 2020
While US-China relations are at an all-time low, optimism about relations...
Verkada Disruptive Embedded Live Help on Sep 24, 2020
Call up your integrator? Have someone come by the next day? Verkada is...
IP Networking Course Fall 2020 - Last Chance - Register Now on Sep 23, 2020
Today is the last chance to register for the only IP networking course...