Zwirn-Backed Lawsuit Against Carrier / UTC / GE Partially Survives

Published Jul 10, 2023 16:17 PM

Carrier, GE Security, Interlogix, and UTC will continue to battle Jeffrey Zwirn's alarm system defect claims in court after a U.S. judge refused to grant the companies' request for a full dismissal of a proposed class action that relies on his findings.

IPVM Image

In this note, we examine the 26-page ruling, the parts of the lawsuit that survived, what was thrown out, and the arguments considered.

*********:*** *****'* **-**** ****** ** *** motion ** *******.

IPVM Image

***** ****** ****** ** *** ********* will **** ** ** *** **********, including ******* ********* ** ****** ****** ******** ***** ***, ****** *** *****, *** ****** of ******* ********. **** ***** ****** were *********.

"*******" ** **** ******** ***** *** claim *** *********, ***** "******" ***** the ***** ********.

IPVM Image

Judge's ********

*** ***** ***** **** *** *********, New ****** ********* ****** ******, *******: "sufficient ***** ** ******* ** ***** claim ** *** ****** ** ******* stage."

******'* ********** **** **********' ********* ********* the ***** ********* ****** ********** ****** unlawful *******. ****** ********** ****** ************* loss *** * ****** ********** ******* the ******** ******* *** *** ************* loss ** ******** "*** ** ****** losses *** ********** ***** ** *** Alarm[s]....

************, ***** ********** ***** ******'* ***** cannot ******* ******* ********** ********** ****** the ****** **** ** *********, *** Court ** "******** ** ****** ** true *** ******* *********** ** *** complaint *** **** *** ********** **** the ***** ******* ** *** ***** most ********* ** *** [***-******] *****."

*********, *** ***** ***** **** *** common *** ***** *** ****** ** express ******** ****** **** ************ ******* because ****** ****** **** *********** ***** representations **** *** ***** ****** *** UL *** ******** **** ********** *********.

*** ****** ** *** *********'****** ** ************** ** ******* ****** *** "********* alleged." ** **** *** ******* *** merits ** *** ******, ***** ***** be ****** ***** *********.

Statute ** ***********

**************** ** **'* ************* *** **** *** *** ****** filed, *** ***** **** ***** **** it *** ****** * ***-**** ******* of ***********. ****** ********* *** ***** alarm ** ****, ******** ** ** 2006, *** ******** ** ** ****. The ******* *** ***** ** ******* 2022.

*** ***** ***** **** *** ******* of *********** ****'* ***** ***** ****** learned ** *** ******* ****** **** upgrading *** ********** ******* ** ******* Unit ** ****** ****.

*** ********* **** *** ******* *** Kaplan ****** ***** ** *** *****. In ****, ***** ******* ***** ** *** "***** ***** Recall" ******* ************** **** ** ****** * "************ failure" ** * *** ****** *** to *** **** ******* *************.

No ********** ** *****

******** ******'* **** ***** ******* ** Zwirn's ****** ** * ******, ********* his ******* **************, ********* ** ********* he ***** ** *** ******** **** Protection ******, *** ** ******** ** commissioned **** ********** ************** ******* & ***********, ******* *** ******** ****** *** his **** ** ********** ** *** judge's ******.

*******, *** ******** ******** *****'* *********** by ******* **** *** ****** *********** amount ** * ********* *****.

***** *** *** ***** ** ****'* request *** *******, *** ** *** indicated ** ** ***** ** *** decision. ** **** *, ****,** ****** * ****** ***** ***** *** ******, ****** "***** Won't ******* ******* ******** ****** ***** Claims," ** ******** ** **** *, 2023, ******* ********** *******.

IPVM Image

Dismissed ******

*** ***** ****** **** ********* ***** on ******** ** **** ********* ***** requirements, **** ** *** ********-**** ******** Act's "**********" **** **** ***** ** at ***** *** ***** **********. (****** is *** **** ********** ***** ** his *********.)

****** *** ****** ** **** *** requirements *** ** ****** ********** ***** or * ********* ** *** *****'* New ****** *****-**-******** ********, ********, *** Notice *** ******* ** ****'* ****** that ** ****** *** ****** **** any ** *** ********* *********. ** also ****'* ******* *** ******* ***** how ** ********* ****.

* ****** ** ******* ******** ***** was ********* ******* ** *** "********" by * ******** ***** ******* ********* law, *** * ********* ***************** ***** was ***** ** ** ****** ** the "******** ****" ********.

**********

***** *** ******* *** ***** **** a "************" **** ****** ** "******** of ***** *******." ** ******* **** if *** ****** ** **** *** systems ****** ** *** ******* ** an ********, *** ****** ***** "**** up" ** ********* ***********.

*** ******** ** ******** *** * power *********** **** ****** ** ********,*** ***********.** ******* **** ************* ***** ** subject ** *********** ***** ********* ******* that ***.

*******, **** ***** ********* ** *** uptake **** *************, *** **** *** complexity ** *********** ** **** ******** of ***** ******* *** * ****** obstacle, **** *****. ****, *** *** alarm ******* *** *** *************.

**** ******* ****:

Two ***** *******

****** *** ******* ********* ***** *** same *** ****,****** ********* **, ***** ******** ******** ***** ******* in **** ******* ***** ********* **** the ****** ***** *******. *** ****** homeowner ********* *********** ***** * ********* against ******* ************ *** ********* **** the ******* ******.

*********** *** ***** ********* ***** *** combination ****** ******* *** **** ***** system ******* **** ********* ** *** home "** ** ****** ****," ********* to *** *********. *** *********** **** on *** **** ********* ******** ** Zwirn **. *** ****** ****.

********* *** ******* **** **** ****** ****** ** *******, *** * ***** *** *** yet *****. ******** **** ********** ***** dire ************ ********* ** **** ***** happen ** ******** ********* ** *** event ** ** ***** ****** *******, neither ********* ******* ***** * ****** of * ****** ******* *** *** lawsuit ***** ******** ********* ** *** defect ******* ****.

Arguments **********

******* ** ** ***** *** ***** to ******* ******'* **** ******* ** had *** "********* *******" ***** ** misrepresentation. *** ****** ******* *** ********* organization ** ********* *** ****** ** issue, ** *** ********* *** ********.

** ***** ******, *** ********* ****:

**’* ************* ** **********’* ***** ******* that *** ** ***** ****** ** the ********* *** *** *** ** this ****. ********** *********** **** *** systems **** ** ******, *** *** complaint ************ **** ** ***, ** fact, ******* *** *********** ***** ****** as ********* **** ** *********

*****'* ************ **** ** ****** *** be ********** ** ****** * ****** or *****************, *** ********* ****.

******** *** ********* ****** ******** ** the ********* **** **** ** ******** Zwirn’s ******, ****** ***** **** ******** class-action ******* ** ****** ** *** persons *** *** ** **** ***** “combination ****** ****** ****-*** *********** ******* and **** ***** ****** ******* ***** that **** ************ ** **** ** Defendants ***** *** ***** ***** ** Security *** **********.”

Plaintiff's ********

****** ******* ** *** ****** ** referring ** ********* ********* ** *** case, ********* ***** ********* ******* ***** and **** ********* **** ******* ******* defects ***** ****** ** ******* *** complying **** **** ** *** *** New ****** ************ ****.

*** ****** *********:

*** ********** ******* ***** ** *** comply ******* ** *** ****-*** ******* wiring ****** ***** ******* ***** ** faulted ***/** ******* ******** *** ****-*** circuit ****** ** ********* ********** *** home ** ****, **** ** ** the ****** *****, ** *** ****, attic ** ********, *** ******* **** is ********* ******** ***-********** (*** “***** System ******”).

UL "*** * ******"

****** ***** **** *** *********' ****** about ** *************, ****** ***** **** the ************'* "*** ********** ***** ** clear **** *** ******* ****** **** not ****** ************** *** ********* ******** or ******** **** **** ** ****** with ********** ***** *********."

*** ******* ******,* ****** ********** *****-************* ** ******* ******** ** ******** globally, ******* **** *** ************ ***** liability *** ******* ** ****** **** applicable ************.

********* ** *** ******:

** **** **** *********, **** ***** product ****** **** ***** ******* ** as * ***** *********. ************* ***** be ********* ****** ****** *** ** listing ** * ****** **** ********* for ********* ********, *** ** ***** potentially ** ****** *** ** ******** by *** ********* ** ****** *********. That ** ****** *** *** **** in *** **** *****. ****, ***** where ** ** ****** ** ****** its ************* ******** *** *** *** far *******.

* ****** *** *** ********** ********* told **** ** ***** ******* ** our *********, *** ** *** *** done **. *************** *** ******* ** al *** *** ***** ** *** request *** *******.

Comments (8)
Avatar
Steve Stowe
Jul 10, 2023

** *** ** ******** ******* ***** installed ** **** ** *** *** panel ***** ******** ** ****?

********** ******** ***** ******** ********** ** the *** ** **** - ***** odd **** ******* ** ***** ********* with ***** ****** ****** *** ***** later.

(2)
(2)
CS
Christie Smythe
Jul 10, 2023

*** ********* **** ** "********" *** unit ** **** "**** * *** wireless ***** ***** ***********." ** **** not ******* **** **** ******. *********** point, ******.

U
Undisclosed #1
Jul 11, 2023

*******, *** ******** ******** *****'* *********** by ******* **** *** ****** *********** amount ** * ********* *****.

* ******** **** **** ********* ********* the *********** ** *****'* ****** ***********.

*** ****** *********** *****'* **** ****** to ** * ********* *****.

*******, ******** ***** ** **** *** ********- *** ******** **** ******* ** is *** (*** **** ** ***** hard ** **) ****** *** *** or *** ***** - ***.

*.*. ***** ** ******** **** **** he *** ***** *** ******* *** - ** **** *********** **** *** position *** ******** ***.

**** ** *** ******** ***** **** at **** ****, ***.

**** *****'* ******** ****** ****:

"******* *** ***** ****** *** ***** on ***** *********** ***********, **** ********* dismissal"

* ***'* ***** **** ******** ******** Zwirn's *********** **** ******* *** ******* of *** ***** *** *** ********* -**** *** ***** **** ****.

*******, **** *** ***** ******** ******* it ******'* ** ******** ****** *** like *** ***** ****** ****.

(1)
CS
Christie Smythe
Jul 11, 2023

** *** ****** ** ******* *****, the *** ***** ** ******* *** claims *** "*********." *** ****** ** the *****, ** ******, ***** ** argued *****.

* **** ******* **** ***** ********* allegations ** ********* ********. *** ****** or *****, ** ** ****** ******* for *** ** ***** ***** ** make ** **** *** ****** ** dismiss *****.

** ****'* **** *** ***** **** wasn't *********. ***** ** ***** ****** survived *** ****** *** *** ***** rejected *** **********' *** ********* ** arguing *** **** *********.

****** *** **** *****. * ***'* know ** **** *** *** ***** decision ** ***. *** ** ** what ** **.

(1)
U
Undisclosed #1
Jul 11, 2023

* **** ******* **** ***** ********* allegations ** ********* ********. *** ****** or *****, ** ** ****** ******* for *** ** ***** ***** ** make ** **** *** ****** ** dismiss *****.

*** **** ** ***** ********* ******* cases **** ***'** ******* ******** * product ******** ***** ***** ********* *** not ******** *** ********* *******?

* ***'* ***** ** ** ******* that * **** **** **** ******** the ****** ** ******* ***** - which ********* ***** *** **** ** dumb ****.

*** *****'* ***** ********* **** ***** with *** ******* ************* ** **** case - ** ****** - ***** no *********** ** *** ******* *****.

(1)
JH
John Honovich
Jul 11, 2023
IPVM

* ******* ******** ***** ***** ********* for *** ******** *** ********* *******?

**** ** *** *********** ****, ** Zwirn ** *** *** *********. **** found **** ********* ***, ** ** opinion, ** ****** ** * ***** for *****'* ***********, ***** *** ******* the **** ***** ** *****.

(2)
CS
Christie Smythe
Jul 11, 2023

***** **** ***** ** *** ****** who ********* ********** *** ******, *** he **** ****** ** ******* **** selling * ******* **** ********** ***** the ******, * ***** **** ******** more ********** **** ** **** ***** in *** *******.

******* *** ******* **** **** ********** are ******** ** ** ****** ** the ***** **** ********* ** *** plaintiff ** * ***, ******* ***** rulings **** ********** **** *** ****** much ******** *** **********. **** ***** scholars (******* **** **** *** ********** *** Review) ***** **** ******* ******** ********* actually **** ******* ****** *** **** leeway ** ******* ****** ** * MTD.

***** *** **** ******** ****** ** the ****** ***** *** ***** ************ that ******* ****** ******'* **** ******** standards *** ** ***** **** *** claims **** ******** ** "*******" *********. That ********* **.

JH
John Honovich
Sep 19, 2023
IPVM

*** ********* *** ******* ***** *********. ** **** *** *** ******* what *** *******.

.