WDR Tutorial

By: IPVM Team, Published on Jan 11, 2019

Understanding wide dynamic range (WDR) is critical to capturing high quality images in demanding conditions. However, with no real standards, any manufacturer can claim WDR, and many do even if actual performance is weak, causing confusion for even experienced users.

In this tutorial, we break down these issues, explaining:

  • State of WDR
  • What is WDR?
  • Interpreting WDR Specifications
  • How Do You Measure WDR?
  • Camera WDR Challenges
  • WDR vs Resolution
  • True WDR Implementations
  • Fake WDR Concerns
  • Manufacturer Terminology Confusion

************* **** ******* ***** (WDR) ** ******** ** capturing **** ******* ****** in ********* **********. *******, with ** **** *********, any ************ *** ***** WDR, *** **** ** even ** ****** *********** is ****, ******* ********* for **** *********** *****.

** **** ********, ** break **** ***** ******, explaining:

  • ***** ** ***
  • **** ** ***?
  • ************ *** **************
  • *** ** *** ******* WDR?
  • ****** *** **********
  • *** ** **********
  • **** *** ***************
  • **** *** ********
  • ************ *********** *********

[***************]

2019 ***** ** ***

****** **** ** **** continue ****** **** ****:

*** ** ***** *** quite * ********* ******* found ** ***** ******, but ** ** *** closer **** **** ******. We ****** **** ***** to ********.

What ** ***?

*** ****** *******************, *** ** *********** the ******* ** ******* high ******* ***** ****** a ***** ** ***** levels. *** *******, ** the ***** *****, *** center ** *** ***** is **** ****** *** to *** ******** ****** the ****** ********, ***** the ***** ** *** hallway *** **** ******, and *** **** **** (facing *** ******) ****** still ** ** **** not ******* *** ****** sunlight. ** **** ****** exactly *** ** ******* these ***** ****** *****.

brightest

*** *** **** * big ********** ** ****** with ****** ********* ***** levels. ****'* *********** * ****** ******* in * *******. *** non-WDR ****** ***** **** rough *******, *** *** facial ***********, ***** *** true *** ****** ******* shows *** *******'* ****, hairstyle, *** ****.

wdr improves effective details

Camera *** **********

****** ******* ********* ******** with **** ****** ** lighting ******* ** ***** dependency ** * ****** exposure. ******* **** ***** to ******** ** *****. However, *** **** ***** and *** ***** ** washed *** *** *** little ***** *** *** image ** *** ****.

** *** **** * scene **** **** ********, it ** ** *******. The ****** **** ****** adjust *** **** ******* size ** *** ******* speed ** *** *** right ****** ** *****. This ** *** ************* typically **** ***** ******* in **** ******** ******.

*******, ** *** ***** has * **** ***** of ********, *** ****** has * ***** *********. If ** ********* *** amount ** ***** ** takes ** ** ******** for *** ****** *****, the ***** ***** ***** will ** *** ****. However, ** ** ******* the ******** ********, ********** for *** ***** *****, the ****** **** **** be ****** ***. *** image ***** ***** **** tough ********:

wdr bright vs dark area tradeoff

*********, *********, ***** ** be **** ** ******** this.

Measuring ***

** ** ******** ** know *** **** *** range ** ***** ****** a ***** ***. *** generally ******** **** ** measure **** ** ************ is *** ******* (*.*., 58dB, *****, ***.) **** higher ****** ********** ******** WDR ***********.

*************, ***** ************ *** not ************ *** *** at *** ********** ** each ************, ** ****** not ** *******. *****, manufacturers *** ***** ********* "grades" ** ***, ****** things **** **** ********* (see ******* *****).

******************* ***** *** ****** cryptic (*.*., **** **** it **** **********?), **** are ******** ** * specific **** ********. * grayscale ***** ** **** with ******** ****** **** white ** *****. *** more ****** * ****** can *******/*******, *** ****** its******** *** *** ****** its *** *********** ****** be. ***** ** ** example ***** *********'* *** *********** **********:

greyscale wdr

*************, **** **** *** translate **** ** **** world ****** (*.*., **** can * ****** *** my ***** **** ******?) nor ** **** ******** guaranteed ** ** **** or ******** ****** ** all *************.

Interpreting *** **************

*** ****** ***** ***** manufacturer ** ************** ** they *** ****-******** *** not ********* *************. *******, there *** **** ******** to ********:

  • * *** ** ****** of **** ** **** almost ****** ***** **** the ****** **** *** support **** *** ** manufacturers **** **** ****** their ******* **** *** will ****** **** *** camera ** *** ** the *** '*****'. '*******', non *** ******* ********** are ********* ** *** range ** ** - 70dB.
  • * *** ** ****** of ***+ *******, *** not ******, ***** **** the ****** ******** **** multi-exposure ***. *****, ******, since ************* *** **** to ****** *** ***** they ****, ** ** not **********. **** **** to ****** *** **** own ***** ** ****** **** *******.
  • *******, **** ************* *** relatively ************ ** ***** WDR ** *******. *** example, **** ***** **** of ***** **** *** cameras ** '****' ****. This **** *** **** they *** ***** **** a **** ******* ************ self-assigning ***** ** *****. Actual ******* ** ******** to ******.
  • ** *** **** *** years, ** **** **** manufacturers ********** *** ** race **** ************** ** 130dB ** **** *****. However, ** *** *******, cameras **** ***** ** specifications (**** ****) *** out ******* **** ** real-world *******.

An *********** ********

** *** *******, ** have ********* ** *********** real ***** ******** ** measuring *** ***** * WDR ***** **. ***** a *** *****, ** record *** ********* *** the ******* ***** ** each *****. *** ***** of *** *** ******** a ****** ********* ** how *********** *** ***** is.

** * ******* ******* outdoors, **** * ***** opening ** ** ******** areas, *** ***** ** typically ***** ****, ** shown *****:

measuring wdr light level variance

*** *** ***** ** ~6.5x, **** *** **** doorway ** **** *** and *** ******** ****** sides ** ~*** ***.

*** ****** *** **** to * *** ***** of *, *** **** likely **** *** ********** is ******. ********, *** lower ***** *** **** powerful *** ************* *** needs.

**** **** *** ******** you **** **** ** measure *** **** *** be **** ** * field **** **** * $100-$150 *** *****. *******, do **** **** ** do **** **** *** sun ** ********* ** the *** ***** **** vary ********** *** *** as *** *** *****.

Resolution **. ***

** *******, ****** ********** improves ***, *** ***** factors ***** *****. **** is *** *** **** nor *** **** ************* approach (*** **** *****). However, ********** *** ****** of ****** ***** ******* finer ******* **** ** the ****** / ******** areas. *** ** ******* from *** *****:

5mp vs SD vs HD

*** ***** ********* ** the ** ******, **** though ** *** **** WDR. *** *** *** WDR ****** ***** ** simply ******* ** ******** more *******. *******, *** HD ****** **** **** WDR ******** *** ****.

**** **** *****-******** *** is ********* ****** ********* for ******* **** ******* scenes, ** ****** ********** increases ** *** ******* to *****'* ***. *******, all ****** *****, * higher ********** ***-*** ****** may ****** ********** * lower ********** *****.

WDR *************** - **** ** ****

***** *** **** ********* for *** ****** ** setting *** ******** ************* to ******* **** **** and ****** *****, *** most ****** ****** ******** is ** *** ******** exposures *** **** ******* them ** ******* * better ******* *****. *** short ******** ******** *** bright *****, ***** *** long ******** ******** *** dark *****. *** ************** below:

true multi-exposure wdr example

** *** *******, **** is *** **** ******** of *** *** ********** WDR *******.

***** ** ********* ******* for *** ******* ***** multiple *********, **** ** not **********. *** ****** of ********* **** *** the ***** ***** ********** techniques *********** *** **** make * **********. *******, none ** ***** *** typically ********.

Multiple ********* **** *** *****

* ****** ******** ** multi-exposure *** *************** ** worse *********** ** *** light. ***** ******** ********* typically ********* *** **** a ******* *** ** set. *******, **** ** is ****,****** ************* ** **** *****, producing * ******** ***** (though ** *** *** and *** ******* ****** ****).

**** ***** *** *******, make **** **** *** is ******** ** ***** for ******* *** ***** performance. **** ******* ** this *************, ****** ***** for ****** ************* *** a *** **** ** option. **** ** ** important ******* ** ***** if *** ***** ** a ******** *** *** location ********.

Fake *** **********

*** ***** ******-*** ********** have ***** **** ******* by ************* ** ***** alternatives ** *****-******** ***. However, *** ***** **** shown **** ***** ********** simply ** *** ******* to **** * *** performance **** *** ******:

********* ************

***, ** ********* ************, simply ******* *** (******) exposure ** * ******. This ** ****** **** when *** **** ** capture **** *** ****** or **** ***** ** the ***** *** *** both. ** ***** ***, you **** **** *** portion ** *** ***** better ** *** ******* of *** ***** ***** worse.

blc vs true wdr

"*******" ***

******* ***, **** ***** as ****, ****, ** ********** *** is *********** * ******** adjustment ** ******** ******* of *** *****, ******* of *** ******* *****. DWDR *** ** ****** in **** ****** **** doing *******, *** ***** techniques ***** ** *** compare ** **** ***.

**** **** **** ************* offer **** ******* *** in ******** ** **** WDR, *** ***** *** easily ******* *** ***, such ******' "******* *******" **. "Dynamic ********". ****** ** ***** terms *** ***** ** our*** ***** *****(**** *****).

Same ************ - **** *** ** *** ***

**** * ************* ****** 'true' ***, **** ******* typically ****** ************* ****** performance ** ***** ******** conditions **** *** *** WDR *******. ***** ****** were ************ **** **** expensive **** ***-*** ********. However, ** ****** ***** this *** *** ******** significantly, **** **** ************* offering **** *** ****** their ****** ****. **** still ***** ***-*** ****** in ***** **** ****** cost *****, ***** ********* perform ******* ***** ** WDR ****** **** ******** low **** ******.

** * ****** *******,*********'* ***** *** **** Value ******* *********** **** ***, ***** has **** ***** ** their ***** *** **** lines (***** *******/***********) *** several *****, *** ******** much ***** ******* **** strong ********* *** ** darker ***** ** *** scenes.

************, ***** ********, **** manufacturers' ******* ******* **** WDR, *** *** ** maximum **********. **** ** found ** **** ***** models ***** ***** ** increase ** ******** ********** with *** *** (********* instead ** **********), ** well ****** *** *********** ******* * **** to **** ** ********** (2560x1440 ******* ** *********).

true wdr mode quad hd vs 4mp digital wdr

WDR ************ ***** ***** *** ****** ********

******* ************* *** ** cryptic ***** *** *******, we **** *** ******** a **** ** ************* detailing ******* **** ******* ‘true’ (*****-********) ***, ‘****’ (digital/electronic ***), ** ****. We **** ******* ***** to ********* *********, ****** conventions, ***.

*** ** ************* **** cameras **** ******* ‘****’ WDR, ***** ***** **** of **** **** **** cameras **** ******* ******* WDR.

*** ******* ******* ********* this **** *** ********** manufacturer *********, ****** **** our*** ************ ***** ***** and ****** **************.

Camera ****** ********

** **** **** ******** and ******** ***** ******* are **** *** *** have ***** **** ** our****** ******(***** *******, ****** *** = ***).

**** *** ***** **** our ****** ******:

Test **** *********

**** ***** ******** *******

[****: **** ******** *** originally ********* ** **** but *** ******* ** 2016 *** **** ** relate ******** ** *** availability.]

Comments (11)

Interesting article and can't agree more on your point about standard testing methods for documented datasheet specifications. Ideally from a manufacturer's perspective, there should be standards for measurement and reporting to level the playing field and insure customers understand the bench performance of the camera(s) they are purchasing. There is an emerging standard and test method which some companies, including mine have adopted.

Opto-Electronic Conversion Function (OECF) analysis according to IEC 62676 Part 5.

The difficulty here is when only a select few companies participate and use the testing standards to report the "true" benchmark specs, customers are often misled making comparisons based on the documented specs to camera manufacturers who use "theoretical" specs for their products. As a marketer who wants to be truthful and at the same time competitive, finding a balance can be tricky. We have found that including both specs get us to this compromise.

High Dynamic Range
(HDR) Mode - 120 dB WDR
Measured under IEC 62676 Part 5 - 108 dB WDR

Only a 12dB difference between the 2 measurements but this difference could block products from participating in large project bids. Providing an honest rating based on the standard seems to be the proper direction long term and for now we include both while we wait on the rest of our industry to adopt the standard.

Thank you for the article.

One correction regarding the table at the end.

Avigilon.

You are correct that for H3 cameras only 3MP with "W" at the model name have WDR but for the newer models H4 almost all of them have WDR (1MP,2MP,3MP). They are marked with a C(meaning COMBO for both WDR and super starlight). The 5MP supports super starlight and is only marked with an L.

Thanks, we've updated that chart with the "C" model info.

it will be good to standardize WDR rating among all the manufactures of different cameras using a Luxmeter or any other instruments.

...it will be good to standardize WDR rating...

What’s good for the user isn’t good for the vendor...

List of cameras from various manufacturer supporting True WDR Digital WDR and both - great work!!

Shouldn’t the light meter point at the scene instead of pointing at the camera?

We want to know much light is falling / hitting the subject so aiming the meter in the same direction as the subject is facing (at the camera) is appropriate.

Yes but the FOV of the lightmeter is likely far bigger than the circumference of the camera’s lens.

Therefore, IMHO, it’s an average of everything reflected by the camera and everything around the camera. Which would mean it would vary greatly depending on what the reflectivity is of what is around the camera:

vs vs

Are you referring to what is behind the camera? If so, our backgrounds are generally neutral / even when it comes to reflexivity and light emission.

Btw, if you have some other technique for measuring, happy to consider but this is the typical way that manufacturers measure lux levels as well.

I was referring to anything that is reflecting light into the meter.

But it is still not clear to me how you are taking this reading:

In this picture, you seem to be measuring lux. Yet there are two measurements, 200 and 1300. Was the light meter moved to where the red dots are (but still pointed at where the camera would be) to take each of the readings?

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

History of Video Surveillance on Jul 19, 2019
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to emerging into an AI cloud era.  The goal of this history...
HD Analog vs IP Guide on Jul 16, 2019
For years, HD resolution and single cable signal/power were IP camera advantages, with analog cameras limited to much lower resolution and...
Axis ARTPEC-7 P1375-E Camera Tested on Jul 12, 2019
Axis claims the new P1375-E box camera with ARTPEC-7 chip delivers "clear, sharp images in any lighting condition." But how well does it do? We...
Last Chance - Camera Course Summer 2019 on Jul 11, 2019
Last day to register is Thursday, July 11, 2019. This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Hikvision ColorVu Camera Tested on Jun 24, 2019
Hikvision says their new ColorVu line captures "vivid chromatic images in darkness", with unconventional white light illuminations whereas most...
Repositionable Multi-Imager Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Vivotek on Jun 19, 2019
Repositionable multi-imager cameras are one of the fastest growing segments in video surveillance, with a slew of new offerings being recently...
False Verkada 'Unrivaled' Low Light Performance Claim Removed on Jun 12, 2019
Verkada falsely claimed that it delivered 'UNRIVALED LOW LIGHT PERFORMANCE' until IPVM questioned. In fact, Verkada's low light performance is...
Avigilon 32MP and 12MP H4 Multisensor Cameras Tested on Jun 11, 2019
Avigilon has released their H4 Multi-Sensor line of cameras claiming "broad scene coverage and high image detail" We bought and tested the...
Vivotek 20MP Multi-Imager Tested on May 30, 2019
Vivotek has released their latest repositionable multi-imager camera, the MA9321-EHTV, a 20 MP model claiming "Supreme Night Visibility", "Optimal...
Verkada Video Quality Problems Tested on May 23, 2019
Verkada suffers from numerous video quality problems, not found in commercial IP cameras, new IPVM testing of Verkada vs Axis and Hikvision...

Most Recent Industry Reports

History of Video Surveillance on Jul 19, 2019
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to emerging into an AI cloud era.  The goal of this history...
Mobile Access Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 18, 2019
The ability to use mobile phones as access credentials is one of the biggest trends in a market that historically has been slow in adopting new...
New GDPR Guidelines for Video Surveillance Examined on Jul 18, 2019
The highest-level EU data protection authority has issued a new series of provisional video surveillance guidelines. While GDPR has been in...
Wyze AI Analytics Tested - Beats Axis and Hikvision on Jul 17, 2019
$20 camera disruptor Wyze has released free person detection deep learning analytics to all of their users, claiming users will "Only get notified...
Anyvision Aims For 2022 Revenue of $1 Billion on Jul 17, 2019
Only 3 video surveillance manufacturers do a billion dollars or more in annual revenue - Hikvision, Dahua, and Axis. Now, Anyvision plans to join...
HD Analog vs IP Guide on Jul 16, 2019
For years, HD resolution and single cable signal/power were IP camera advantages, with analog cameras limited to much lower resolution and...
How To Troubleshoot Wiegand Reader Problems - Inverted Wiring on Jul 16, 2019
Wiegand is the dominant method of connecting access readers, but problems can arise for installers. In fact, one of the most difficult reader...
ZeroEyes Gun Detection Startup on Jul 16, 2019
A gun detection video analytics startup, ZeroEyes, is being led by a group of 6 former Navy SEALs, aiming to "save lives" by using AI to assist...
Motorola Acquires Watchguard, Adds to Vigilant And Avigilon on Jul 15, 2019
2 years ago, Motorola had no position nor relevancy to video surveillance. Now, they own major video surveillance, LPR and body camera providers...
Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Jul 15, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact