WDR Tutorial

Author: IPVM Team, Published on Jan 11, 2019

Understanding wide dynamic range (WDR) is critical to capturing high quality images in demanding conditions. However, with no real standards, any manufacturer can claim WDR, and many do even if actual performance is weak, causing confusion for even experienced users.

In this tutorial, we break down these issues, explaining:

  • State of WDR
  • What is WDR?
  • Interpreting WDR Specifications
  • How Do You Measure WDR?
  • Camera WDR Challenges
  • WDR vs Resolution
  • True WDR Implementations
  • Fake WDR Concerns
  • Manufacturer Terminology Confusion

************* **** ******* ***** (***) ** ******** ** ********* **** quality ****** ** ********* **********. *******, **** ** **** *********, any ************ *** ***** ***, *** **** ** **** ** actual *********** ** ****, ******* ********* *** **** *********** *****.

** **** ********, ** ***** **** ***** ******, **********:

  • ***** ** ***
  • **** ** ***?
  • ************ *** **************
  • *** ** *** ******* ***?
  • ****** *** **********
  • *** ** **********
  • **** *** ***************
  • **** *** ********
  • ************ *********** *********

[***************]

2019 ***** ** ***

****** **** ** **** ******** ****** **** ****:

*** ** ***** *** ***** * ********* ******* ***** ** every ******, *** ** ** *** ****** **** **** ******. We ****** **** ***** ** ********.

What ** ***?

*** ****** *******************, *** ** *********** *** ******* ** ******* **** ******* image ****** * ***** ** ***** ******. *** *******, ** the ***** *****, *** ****** ** *** ***** ** **** bright *** ** *** ******** ****** *** ****** ********, ***** the ***** ** *** ******* *** **** ******, *** *** back **** (****** *** ******) ****** ***** ** ** **** not ******* *** ****** ********. ** **** ****** ******* *** to ******* ***** ***** ****** *****.

brightest

*** *** **** * *** ********** ** ****** **** ****** different ***** ******. ****'* *********** * ****** ******* ** * *******. *** ***-*** ****** shows **** ***** *******, *** *** ****** ***********, ***** *** true *** ****** ******* ***** *** *******'* ****, *********, *** more.

wdr improves effective details

Camera *** **********

****** ******* ********* ******** **** **** ****** ** ******** ******* of ***** ********** ** * ****** ********. ******* **** ***** to ******** ** *****. *******, *** **** ***** *** *** image ** ****** *** *** *** ****** ***** *** *** image ** *** ****.

** *** **** * ***** **** **** ********, ** ** no *******. *** ****** **** ****** ****** *** **** ******* size ** *** ******* ***** ** *** *** ***** ****** of *****. **** ** *** ************* ********* **** ***** ******* in **** ******** ******.

*******, ** *** ***** *** * **** ***** ** ********, the ****** *** * ***** *********. ** ** ********* *** amount ** ***** ** ***** ** ** ******** *** *** bright *****, *** ***** ***** ***** **** ** *** ****. However, ** ** ******* *** ******** ********, ********** *** *** light *****, *** ****** **** **** ** ****** ***. *** image ***** ***** **** ***** ********:

wdr bright vs dark area tradeoff

*********, *********, ***** ** ** **** ** ******** ****.

Measuring ***

** ** ******** ** **** *** **** *** ***** ** light ****** * ***** ***. *** ********* ******** **** ** measure **** ** ************ ** *** ******* (*.*., ****, *****, etc.) **** ****** ****** ********** ******** *** ***********.

*************, ***** ************ *** *** ************ *** *** ** *** discretion ** **** ************, ** ****** *** ** *******. *****, manufacturers *** ***** ********* "******" ** ***, ****** ****** **** more ********* (*** ******* *****).

******************* ***** *** ****** ******* (*.*., **** **** ** **** physically?), **** *** ******** ** * ******** **** ********. * grayscale ***** ** **** **** ******** ****** **** ***** ** black. *** **** ****** * ****** *** *******/*******, *** ****** its******** *** *** ****** *** *** *********** ****** **. ***** is ** ******* ***** *********'* *** *********** **********:

greyscale wdr

*************, **** **** *** ********* **** ** **** ***** ****** (i.e., **** *** * ****** *** ** ***** **** ******?) nor ** **** ******** ********** ** ** **** ** ******** fairly ** *** *************.

Interpreting *** **************

*** ****** ***** ***** ************ ** ************** ** **** *** self-assigned *** *** ********* *************. *******, ***** *** **** ******** to ********:

  • * *** ** ****** ** **** ** **** ****** ****** means **** *** ****** **** *** ******* **** *** ** manufacturers **** **** ****** ***** ******* **** *** **** ****** that *** ****** ** *** ** *** *** '*****'. '*******', non *** ******* ********** *** ********* ** *** ***** ** 55 - ****.
  • * *** ** ****** ** ***+ *******, *** *** ******, means **** *** ****** ******** **** *****-******** ***. *****, ******, since ************* *** **** ** ****** *** ***** **** ****, it ** *** **********. **** **** ** ****** *** **** own ***** ** ****** **** *******.
  • *******, **** ************* *** ********** ************ ** ***** *** ** ratings. *** *******, **** ***** **** ** ***** **** *** cameras ** '****' ****. **** **** *** **** **** *** worse **** * **** ******* ************ ****-********* ***** ** *****. Actual ******* ** ******** ** ******.
  • ** *** **** *** *****, ** **** **** ************* ********** the ** **** **** ************** ** ***** ** **** *****. However, ** *** *******, ******* **** ***** ** ************** (**** 90dB) *** *** ******* **** ** ****-***** *******.

An *********** ********

** *** *******, ** **** ********* ** *********** **** ***** approach ** ********* *** ***** * *** ***** **. ***** a *** *****, ** ****** *** ********* *** *** ******* spots ** **** *****. *** ***** ** *** *** ******** a ****** ********* ** *** *********** *** ***** **.

** * ******* ******* ********, **** * ***** ******* ** an ******** *****, *** ***** ** ********* ***** ****, ** shown *****:

measuring wdr light level variance

*** *** ***** ** ~*.**, **** *** **** ******* ** 1300 *** *** *** ******** ****** ***** ** ~*** ***.

*** ****** *** **** ** * *** ***** ** *, the **** ****** **** *** ********** ** ******. ********, *** lower ***** *** **** ******** *** ************* *** *****.

**** **** *** ******** *** **** **** ** ******* *** this *** ** **** ** * ***** **** **** * $100-$150 *** *****. *******, ** **** **** ** ** **** when *** *** ** ********* ** *** *** ***** **** vary ********** *** *** ** *** *** *****.

Resolution **. ***

** *******, ****** ********** ******** ***, *** ***** ******* ***** equal. **** ** *** *** **** *** *** **** ************* approach (*** **** *****). *******, ********** *** ****** ** ****** helps ******* ***** ******* **** ** *** ****** / ******** areas. *** ** ******* **** *** *****:

5mp vs SD vs HD

*** ***** ********* ** *** ** ******, **** ****** ** use **** ***. *** *** *** *** ****** ***** ** simply ******* ** ******** **** *******. *******, *** ** ****** with **** *** ******** *** ****.

**** **** *****-******** *** ** ********* ****** ********* *** ******* wide ******* ******, ** ****** ********** ********* ** *** ******* to *****'* ***. *******, *** ****** *****, * ****** ********** non-WDR ****** *** ****** ********** * ***** ********** *****.

WDR *************** - **** ** ****

***** *** **** ********* *** *** ****** ** ******* *** exposure ************* ** ******* **** **** *** ****** *****, *** most ****** ****** ******** ** ** *** ******** ********* *** then ******* **** ** ******* * ****** ******* *****. *** short ******** ******** *** ****** *****, ***** *** **** ******** captures *** **** *****. *** ************** *****:

true multi-exposure wdr example

** *** *******, **** ** *** **** ******** ** *** top ********** *** *******.

***** ** ********* ******* *** *** ******* ***** ******** *********, this ** *** **********. *** ****** ** ********* **** *** the ***** ***** ********** ********** *********** *** **** **** * difference. *******, **** ** ***** *** ********* ********.

Multiple ********* **** *** *****

* ****** ******** ** *****-******** *** *************** ** ***** *********** in *** *****. ***** ******** ********* ********* ********* *** **** a ******* *** ** ***. *******, **** ** ** ****,****** ************* ** **** *****, ********* * ******** ***** (****** ** too *** *** *** ******* ****** ****).

**** ***** *** *******, **** **** **** *** ** ******** at ***** *** ******* *** ***** ***********. **** ******* ** this *************, ****** ***** *** ****** ************* *** * *** have ** ******. **** ** ** ********* ******* ** ***** if *** ***** ** * ******** *** *** ******** ********.

Fake *** **********

*** ***** ******-*** ********** **** ***** **** ******* ** ************* as ***** ************ ** *****-******** ***. *******, *** ***** **** shown **** ***** ********** ****** ** *** ******* ** **** a *** *********** **** *** ******:

********* ************

***, ** ********* ************, ****** ******* *** (******) ******** ** a ******. **** ** ****** **** **** *** **** ** capture **** *** ****** ** **** ***** ** *** ***** but *** ****. ** ***** ***, *** **** **** *** portion ** *** ***** ****** ** *** ******* ** *** other ***** *****.

blc vs true wdr

"*******" ***

******* ***, **** ***** ** ****, ****, ** ********** *** ** *********** * ******** ********** ** multiple ******* ** *** *****, ******* ** *** ******* *****. DWDR *** ** ****** ** **** ****** **** ***** *******, but ***** ********** ***** ** *** ******* ** **** ***.

**** **** **** ************* ***** **** ******* *** ** ******** to **** ***, *** ***** *** ****** ******* *** ***, such ******' "******* *******" **. "******* ********". ****** ** ***** ***** *** ***** ** ****** ***** *****(**** *****).

Same ************ - **** *** ** *** ***

**** * ************* ****** '****' ***, **** ******* ********* ****** substantially ****** *********** ** ***** ******** ********** **** *** *** WDR *******. ***** ****** **** ************ **** **** ********* **** non-WDR ********. *******, ** ****** ***** **** *** *** ******** significantly, **** **** ************* ******** **** *** ****** ***** ****** line. **** ***** ***** ***-*** ****** ** ***** **** ****** cost *****, ***** ********* ******* ******* ***** ** *** ****** than ******** *** **** ******.

** * ****** *******,*********'* ***** *** **** ***** ******* *********** **** ***, ***** *** **** ***** ** ***** ***** low **** ***** (***** *******/***********) *** ******* *****, *** ******** much ***** ******* **** ****** ********* *** ** ****** ***** of *** ******.

************, ***** ********, **** *************' ******* ******* **** ***, *** not ** ******* **********. **** ** ***** ** **** ***** models ***** ***** ** ******** ** ******** ********** **** *** off (********* ******* ** **********), ** **** ****** *** *********** ******* * **** ** **** ** ********** (********* ******* of *********).

true wdr mode quad hd vs 4mp digital wdr

WDR ************ ***** ***** *** ****** ********

******* ************* *** ** ******* ***** *** *******, ** **** put ******** * **** ** ************* ********* ******* **** ******* ‘true’ (*****-********) ***, ‘****’ (*******/********** ***), ** ****. ** **** provide ***** ** ********* *********, ****** ***********, ***.

*** ** ************* **** ******* **** ******* ‘****’ ***, ***** about **** ** **** **** **** ******* **** ******* ******* WDR.

*** ******* ******* ********* **** **** *** ********** ************ *********, please **** ****** ************ ***** ***** *** ****** **************.

Camera ****** ********

** **** **** ******** *** ******** ***** ******* *** **** WDR *** **** ***** **** ** ********* ******(***** *******, ****** *** = ***).

**** *** ***** **** *** ****** ******:

Test **** *********

**** ***** ******** *******

[****: **** ******** *** ********** ********* ** **** *** *** revised ** **** *** **** ** ****** ******** ** *** availability.]

Comments (11)

Interesting article and can't agree more on your point about standard testing methods for documented datasheet specifications. Ideally from a manufacturer's perspective, there should be standards for measurement and reporting to level the playing field and insure customers understand the bench performance of the camera(s) they are purchasing. There is an emerging standard and test method which some companies, including mine have adopted.

Opto-Electronic Conversion Function (OECF) analysis according to IEC 62676 Part 5.

The difficulty here is when only a select few companies participate and use the testing standards to report the "true" benchmark specs, customers are often misled making comparisons based on the documented specs to camera manufacturers who use "theoretical" specs for their products. As a marketer who wants to be truthful and at the same time competitive, finding a balance can be tricky. We have found that including both specs get us to this compromise.

High Dynamic Range
(HDR) Mode - 120 dB WDR
Measured under IEC 62676 Part 5 - 108 dB WDR

Only a 12dB difference between the 2 measurements but this difference could block products from participating in large project bids. Providing an honest rating based on the standard seems to be the proper direction long term and for now we include both while we wait on the rest of our industry to adopt the standard.

Thank you for the article.

One correction regarding the table at the end.

Avigilon.

You are correct that for H3 cameras only 3MP with "W" at the model name have WDR but for the newer models H4 almost all of them have WDR (1MP,2MP,3MP). They are marked with a C(meaning COMBO for both WDR and super starlight). The 5MP supports super starlight and is only marked with an L.

Thanks, we've updated that chart with the "C" model info.

it will be good to standardize WDR rating among all the manufactures of different cameras using a Luxmeter or any other instruments.

...it will be good to standardize WDR rating...

What’s good for the user isn’t good for the vendor...

List of cameras from various manufacturer supporting True WDR Digital WDR and both - great work!!

Shouldn’t the light meter point at the scene instead of pointing at the camera?

We want to know much light is falling / hitting the subject so aiming the meter in the same direction as the subject is facing (at the camera) is appropriate.

Yes but the FOV of the lightmeter is likely far bigger than the circumference of the camera’s lens.

Therefore, IMHO, it’s an average of everything reflected by the camera and everything around the camera. Which would mean it would vary greatly depending on what the reflectivity is of what is around the camera:

vs vs

Are you referring to what is behind the camera? If so, our backgrounds are generally neutral / even when it comes to reflexivity and light emission.

Btw, if you have some other technique for measuring, happy to consider but this is the typical way that manufacturers measure lux levels as well.

I was referring to anything that is reflecting light into the meter.

But it is still not clear to me how you are taking this reading:

In this picture, you seem to be measuring lux. Yet there are two measurements, 200 and 1300. Was the light meter moved to where the red dots are (but still pointed at where the camera would be) to take each of the readings?

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Pelco GFC 4K Dome Camera Tested (IMP831-1ERS) on Mar 12, 2019
Pelco has finally released their first 4K IP camera, after years of competitors' releases. Is this move too late? Or is their new GFC Professional...
Axis IR Multi Imager Camera Tested (P3717-PLE) on Feb 18, 2019
Axis has released their first IR multi imager, the P3717-PLE, a repositionable model listing 360° IR illumination and flexible positioning,...
Ubiquiti Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 18, 2019
Ubiquiti has quietly grown into a $1+ billion annual revenue company, with offerings across wireless, wireline network and video surveillance (see...
Hanwha Smaller Multi Imager Tested (PNM-9000VQ) on Feb 14, 2019
Hanwha's first repositionable multi imager PNM-9081VQ tested well, but was huge, over 12" wide and weighing in at over 10 pounds. Now, they have...
Bandwidth vs Low Light Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Geovision, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Feb 08, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance, but do all manufacturers' cameras perform the same? Are some more consistent...
Sony Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 06, 2019
Sony Favorability amongst integrators improved moderately compared to their 2017 favorability results, with a modest net positive...
Hikvision HDTVI Power Over Coax Tested on Feb 05, 2019
After years of delay, Hikvision's Power Over Coax (PoC) HDTVI models are finally shipping, aiming to make HD analog installs as simple as PoE, with...
8MP HD Analog Tested (Dahua / Hikvision) on Jan 30, 2019
HD analog has promised higher resolution for years, but has lagged substantially behind for years. Now, both Dahua and Hikvision have started...
Verkada Cloud VMS/Cameras Tested on Jan 28, 2019
Verkada is arguably the most ambitious video surveillance startup in many years. The company is developing their own cameras, their own VMS, their...
Camera Course Winter 2019 - Last Chance on Jan 24, 2019
This is the last chance to register for the Winter 2019 Camera Course. This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Avigilon Launches 'Renewed Products Program' on Mar 19, 2019
There are lots of 'pre-owned' cars but pre-owned IP cameras? While such programs are common in other industries, in video surveillance, they are...
Hanwha Tax Evasion Probe, Camera Division Implicated on Mar 19, 2019
A Hanwha group subsidiary was raided as part of a tax evasion probe. While a Korean news media report listed the raided entity as 'Hanwha...
Genetec Security Center 5.8 Tested on Mar 19, 2019
Genetec has released Version 5.8. This comes after a wait of more than a year that caused frustrations for many Genetec partners. Our previous...
Retired Mercury President Returns As Open Options President on Mar 18, 2019
Open Options experienced major changes in 2018, including being acquired by ACRE and losing its President and General Manager, John Berman who...
Large US University End-User Video Surveillance Interview on Mar 18, 2019
Schools have become targets in modern days of active shooters and terrorist fears. The need for video and access security is high. Universities...
Hikvision Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 18, 2019
Hikvision favorability results declined significantly in IPVM's 2019 study of 200+ integrators. While in 2017 Hikvision's favorability was...
ONVIF Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 15, 2019
In the past decade, ONVIF has grown from a reaction to the outside Cisco-lead PSIA challenge, to being the de facto video surveillance standard...
Installation Course - Last Chance on Mar 14, 2019
This is the last chance to register for the March Installation course. This is a unique installation course in a market where little practical...
City Physical Security Manager Interview on Mar 14, 2019
This physical security pro is the Physical Security Manager for the City of Calgary. He is a criminologist by training with an ASIS CPP credential....
US Drafting Separate Rule for NDAA Dahua/Hikvision 'Blacklist' on Mar 14, 2019
The most debated provision of the NDAA ban of Dahua, Hikvision, Huawei, et al. is the so-called 'blacklist' provision which would ban any company...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact