US Capital Paying for Homes and Business to Get Security Cameras

By: John Honovich, Published on Feb 09, 2016

Since 9/11, US cities have spent hundreds of millions collectively on city-wide video surveillance system. Now, the US Capital, has an interesting and quite uncommon idea that essentially pays for local homes and business to get security cameras.

In this note, we review the bill itself and examine how this could help improve coverage at incredibly low costs.

***** */**, ** ****** have ***** ******** ** millions ************ ** ****-**** video ************ ******. ***, the ** *******, *** an *********** *** ***** uncommon **** **** *********** pays *** ***** ***** and ******** ** *** security *******.

** **** ****, ** review *** **** ****** and ******* *** **** could **** ******* ******** at ********** *** *****.

[***************]

*****

*** ********** ** **** council *** ****** * bill **** **** ** to $*** *** **************, *** * ***** of $*** *** ******** or $*** *** ******** (i.e., * ** * exterior ******* *****). *** payment **** ** ** the **** ** * rebate. **** ***** **** ** ****.

*** ********* ************ *** fairly *****, ****** ********* "outdoor ************ ******* **** functioning ******* ***** ********* capability."

*** **** *********** *********** is ** ******** *** system **** *** ****. The **** **** *** have *** ****** ****** to *** ******* *** the **** ** ** know, ********* *** ********* get ****** ** **** of * ***** ********* near *** ********* ** business.

******* 

$***,*** *** **** ********* to **** *******. ******** the ******* ****** ******* 1.5 ******* *** $***, this ***** ****** ** 2,500 *******.

*********

**** ***** ******, ********* Washington ** *** ***** millions ** ***** *** internally ******** *** ******* **** video ************ *******. ***** are ******* ******** **** are ********* ** ***** and ********. ** ***** costs ********* *** $**,*** *** camera, ***** *** ***** of ************ *** ************ of ***** ********** ** urban ****.

******** ** **** *****, spending $*** *** ****** is ********* **** *********. Of ******, *** ************* is *** **** ******* (i.e., **/* **-****** ** manually ***** ** * person's ***** ** ******** and ********** **). *** we ******* **** ** a **** ********, *********** getting *,*** ******** ******* the *********** *** ***** easily **** $**+ ******* vs *** **** ******* here. *** *** ******* crimes (*******, *****, ***.), the **** ***** *** a **** *********** ** getting ******** ********.

***********

*** ** **** ******* ** the ************ ******* ******* **** pays *** ** ******* cameras. *** **** ***** ***** private / ****** **** approach ** **** **** remains ******* **** - ***+ Camera **** ****** ** 90% ***** ****.

Comments (11)

Undisclosed #1

02/10/16 08:14pm

The technical requirements are fairly broad, simply requiring "outdoor surveillance cameras with functioning digital video recording capability."

Broad enough for an Analog HD camera to make the cut? Even if it is, they are only reimbursing for cameras, or is there a different allowance for recorder? Or do you get to just average the price with the recorder?

Says it's an emergency 90 day measure, so act now!

Avatar

Jon Dillabaugh

Pro Focus LLC | 02/12/16 11:34pm

Another factor not mentioned above is the side bonus of the home/business owner gets use of the system for personal usage to boot.

Undisclosed #1

In reply to Jon Dillabaugh | 02/12/16 11:48pm

...side bonus of the owner gets use of the system to boot.

What is the other bonus of the system?

Avatar

Jon Dillabaugh

Pro Focus LLC | In reply to Undisclosed #1 | 02/12/16 11:54pm

Taxpayer savings...

Undisclosed #1

In reply to Jon Dillabaugh | 02/13/16 12:00am

Taxpayer savings...

You have an unusually noble sense of priorities. ;)

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Jon Dillabaugh | 02/13/16 12:12am

Since most home cameras are indoors, and this rebate requires outdoor cameras, it may spur additional cameras that might not otherwise be installed.

Avatar

Jon Dillabaugh

Pro Focus LLC | In reply to John Honovich | 02/13/16 12:32am

While I don't do many residential installs, I've yet to install ANY indoor cameras.

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Jon Dillabaugh | 02/13/16 12:44am

Sure, because DIYing indoor cameras is a lot simpler than outdoor ones.

Undisclosed #1

In reply to Jon Dillabaugh | 02/13/16 11:15pm

...I've yet to install ANY indoor cameras.

You must be the guy from the survey. ;)

Avatar

Jon Dillabaugh

Pro Focus LLC | In reply to Undisclosed #1 | 02/13/16 11:23pm

I don't think I was around here in 2012, but if I would have been here, that chart would have said TWO INTEGRATORS at 100%!!

Undisclosed #1

In reply to Jon Dillabaugh | 02/14/16 12:11am

I don't think I was around here in 2012...

Agree, looking at my IPVM one-liner collection, your first entry doesn't appear until late 2013. ;)

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Most Recent Industry Reports

China Dahua Replaces Their Software With US Pepper on Aug 22, 2019
What does a US government banned company do to improve its security positioning in the US? Well, Dahua is unveiling a novel solution, partnering...
Security Integrators Outlook On Remaining Integrators In 2025 on Aug 22, 2019
The industry has changed substantially in the last decade, with the rise of IP cameras and the race to the bottom. Indeed, more changes may be...
First GDPR Facial Recognition Fine For Sweden School on Aug 22, 2019
A school in Sweden has been fined $20,000 for using facial recognition to keep attendance in what is Sweden's first GDPR fine. Notably, the fine is...
Anyvision Facial Recognition Tested on Aug 21, 2019
Anyvision is aiming for $1 billion in revenue by 2022, backed by $74 million in funding. But does their performance live up to the hype they have...
Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...
ZK Teco Atlas Access Control Tested on Aug 20, 2019
Who needs access specialists? China-based ZKTeco claims its newest access panel 'makes it very easy for anyone to learn and install access control...
Uniview Beats Intel In Trademark Lawsuit on Aug 19, 2019
Uniview has won a long-running trademark lawsuit brought by Intel, with Beijing's highest court reversing an earlier Intel win, centered on...
Suprema Biometric Mass Leak Examined on Aug 19, 2019
While Suprema is rarely discussed even within the physical security market, the South Korean biometrics manufacturer made global news this past...
Verkada People And Face Analytics Tested on Aug 16, 2019
This week, Verkada released "People Analytics", including face analytics that they describe is a "game-changing feature" that "pushes the...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact